Osteoporosis International最新文献

Long-term glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment is associated with osteoporosis and fractures. We investigated whether low-dose GC treatment also increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and the results showed that even low-dose GC treatment increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, especially spine fractures.

Purpose: The effect of low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy on the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass was investigated.

Methods: 119,790 66-year-old postmenopausal women with low bone mass based on bone mineral density (BMD) results were included. GC group consisted of patients who had been prescribed oral GCs within 6 months of BMD testing. In GC group, GCs dosage was calculated by a defined daily dose (DDD), and divided into five groups according to GC usage (Group 1[G1]; < 11.25 DDDs, G2; ≥ 11.25, < 22.5 DDDs, G3; ≥ 22.5, < 45 DDDs, G4; ≥ 45, < 90 DDDs, G5; ≥ 90 DDDs). The risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and non-MOF was analyzed and compared with that of the control group during the 1-year follow-up.

Results: The risk of total fracture was higher in G3-G5 than in the control group (G3, hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.46; G4, 1.37 [1.13-1.66]; G5 1.45 [1.08-1.94]). The risk of MOF was higher in all groups except G2 than in the control group (G1, 1.23 [1.05-1.45]; G3, 1.37 [1.11-1.68]; G4, 1.41 [1.09-1.83]; G5, 1.66 [1.14-2.42]). The risk of spine fracture was significantly higher in all GC groups except G2 than in the control group. The risk of non-MOF was higher only in G4 than in the control group (G4, 1.48 [1.13-1.94]).

Conclusion: Low-dose GC therapy can increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures, particularly spine fractures, in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

A fracture liaison service is a systems-level multidisciplinary approach designed to reduce subsequent fracture risk in patients who recently sustained fragility fractures. It is estimated that one in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 years old have osteoporosis. Nonetheless, only 9 to 20% of patients who sustain an initial fragility fracture eventually receive any osteoporosis treatment. With the aim of preventing subsequent fractures, a fracture liaison service (FLS) works through identifying patients presenting with fragility fractures to the hospital and providing them with easier access to osteoporosis care through referrals for bone health and fracture risk assessment and recommendation or initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Currently, there are four major types of FLS models ranging from services that only identify at-risk patients and inform and educate the patient but take no further part in communicating their findings to other stakeholders in patients' care, to services that identify, investigate, and initiate treatment at the other end of the spectrum. In this article, we review the benefits, challenges, and outcomes of FLS in the American healthcare system with further exploration of the roles each member of the multidisciplinary team can play in improving patients' bone health.

The clinical data analysis found that, compared with the traditional obesity index, the waist-weight ratio (WWR) has more advantages in predicting abnormal bone mineral density in subjects with type 2 diabetes. WWR may serve as a new predictive indicator for osteoporosis in T2DM patients.

Purpose: This study was designed to explore the correlation between obesity-related indices and bone mineral density (BMD) and its influencing factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

Methods: A total of 528 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited. Glucose tolerance, insulin stimulation, and blood biochemical tests were conducted on all participants. All subjects underwent dual-energy X-ray bone density testing and were grouped based on the bone density results.

Results: Compared with those in the normal BMD group, the waist-to-body weight ratio (WWR) and weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) in the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups were significantly greater, while body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The logistic regression results showed that the WWR, WWI, and BMI were independently correlated with abnormal BMD in T2DM patients (P < 0.05). WWR and the WWI were negatively correlated with the T-value of bone density in various parts of the body, while BMI was positively correlated with the T-value of bone density (P < 0.05). The area under the working characteristic curve (AUC) for T2DM patients with abnormal bone mass predicted by the WWR [0.806, 95% CI = (0.770-0.843), P < 0.001] was greater than that for patients with other obesity indicators, such as the WWI and BMI.

Conclusion: We found a positive correlation between the WWR and bone density in T2DM patients. Compared with other obesity indicators, such as BMI and WWI, the WWR has a stronger discriminative ability for T2DM patients with abnormal bone density. Therefore, more attention should be given to the WWR in T2DM patients.

Summary

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) increases long-term fracture risk in prostate cancer. Our study showed a higher fracture risk within six months of ADT use, and current use was associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures. Attention is needed for the prevention of fragility fractures at the start of ADT.

Purpose

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is known to increase long-term fracture risk in men with prostate cancer (PCa), although the risk of fragility fractures remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the risk of fragility and malignancy-related fractures in men with PCa treated with ADT.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men with PCa. Follow-up time was divided into 30-day intervals and exposure (current, past, or no-ADT use). Current ADT use was stratified by duration of ADT use (≤ 182 days, 183–730 days, and > 730 days). Cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of fractures.

Results

We included 471 patients (mean age 70.5 (± 8.3) years). The mean follow-up time was 5.0 (± 1.7) years in patients who never started ADT, 3.4 (± 2.3) years and 4.1 (± 2.0) years in patients who started ADT at baseline and during follow-up, respectively. In total, 60 patients had a fracture, 48 (80%) fragility, and 12 (20%) malignancy-related fractures. Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of all fractures (HR 5.10, 95% CI 2.34–11.13) and fragility fractures (HR 3.61, 95% CI 1.57–8.30). The association with malignancy-related fractures could not be studied due to no events during no-ADT use. There was an increased risk of all fractures with longer duration of ADT use.

Conclusions

Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures than no-ADT use. A higher fracture risk was observed within the first six months of ADT use and persisted for longer durations.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder for which treatment options include antiresorptive therapies (e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab); anabolics (e.g., teriparatide, abaloparatide); and dual mechanisms (e.g., romosozumab). Management of osteoporosis with concurrent antiresorptive and anabolic agents may be superior to monotherapy, as demonstrated in the DATA trial with the combination of denosumab and teriparatide. However, there is limited experience with the combination of denosumab and romosozumab, which may be an alternative antiresorptive/anabolic regimen for individuals who are not candidates for PTH receptor agonists. In this case, we present a young man with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who could not tolerate a daily injectable anabolic and who experienced improvement in bone mineral density with concurrent denosumab and off-label romosozumab administration.

Background

Early-life exposure to famine has been hypothesized to influence long-term bone health, potentially increasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in later life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between early-life famine exposure and the risk of osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) loss, and fractures.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, supplemented by manual searches on Google Scholar. Observational studies examining the impact of early-life famine exposure on osteoporosis, BMD, and fracture risk were included. Data were extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, and meta-analyses were performed using the Mantel–Haenszel method for odds ratios (OR) and Hedges’ g for standardized mean differences (SMD). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results

From 6147 initial studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria, with 8 included in the meta-analysis. The early-life famine-exposed group showed a significantly higher incidence of osteoporosis (OR = 2.12, 95%CI [1.35, 3.34], I² = 88%) and fractures (OR = 1.58, 95%CI [1.07, 2.33], I² = 92%) compared to non-exposed individuals. Meta-regression indicated that higher female prevalence in studies made the association with osteoporosis stronger, while higher ages strengthened the association with fractures. Exposure during fetal and childhood stages was particularly associated with increased risks of osteoporosis and fractures. Additionally, famine exposure correlated with lower BMD, particularly in the heels, femoral neck, and total hip regions.

Conclusion

Early-life famine exposure is significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, fractures, and lower BMD in later life. These results emphasize the lasting effects on bones from early lack of nutrition and stress the importance of specific interventions for bone health in groups with past famine experiences. Future studies should investigate the reasons behind these connections and assess preventative approaches to reduce the negative effects on bone health in those impacted.

Summary

Insulin resistance, defined as an impaired biological response to insulin stimulation in target tissues, arises most frequently in the presence of central obesity. Although obesity is generally associated with increased bone mass, recent data challenge this view and, if complicated by T2DM, obese patients are at high risk for fragility fractures. IR may play a key role in this increased fracture risk through effects on bone quality rather than bone quantity. Further understanding of the mechanisms and approaches to prevent osteoporotic fractures in IR-related diseases is needed.

Clinical relevance

The dramatic increase in obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) over the last half-century has led to a worldwide epidemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as in the incidence of insulin resistance (IR). IR is defined as an impaired biological response to insulin stimulation in target tissues and is primarily related to the liver, muscle, and adipose tissue. The most frequent underlying cause is central obesity, and it is known that excess abdominal adipose tissue secretes increased amounts of free fatty acids, which directly affects insulin signalling, reduces glucose uptake in muscle, and triggers excessive triglyceride synthesis and gluconeogenesis in the liver. When pancreatic β cells are unable to secrete the higher levels of insulin needed, T2DM, the main complication of IR, occurs.

Observations

Although obesity is generally associated with increased bone mass, recent data challenge this view and highlight the multifaceted nature of the obesity-bone relationship. Patients with T2DM are at significant risk for well-known complications of diabetes, including retinopathy, nephropathy, macrovascular disease, and neuropathy, but it is clear that they are also at high risk for fragility fractures. Moreover, recent data provide strong evidence that IR may key role in the increased fracture risk observed in both obesity and T2DM.

Conclusions

In this concise review article, the role of IR in increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in MetS, obesity, and T2DM is discussed and summarised, including consideration of the need for fracture risk assessment as a ‘preventive measure’, especially in patients with T2DM and chronic MetS with abdominal obesity. Personalised and targeted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prevent osteoporotic fractures in IR-related diseases are needed and could make significant contributions to health outcomes.