Pediatric emergency care最新文献

Objective: Screening for blunt intra-abdominal injury in children often includes directed laboratory evaluation that guides need for computed tomography. We sought to evaluate the use of urinalysis in identifying patients with clinically important intraabdominal injury ( ci -IAI).

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients less than 18 years who presented with blunt mechanisms at a level I trauma center between 2016 and 2019. Exclusion criteria included transfer from an outside facility, physical abuse, and death within thirty minutes of arrival. Demographics, physical exam findings, serum chemistries, urinalysis, and imaging were reviewed. Clinically important intraabdominal injury was defined as injury requiring ≥2 nights admission, blood transfusion, angiography with embolization, or therapeutic surgery.

Results: Two hundred forty patients were identified. One hundred sixty-five had a completed urinalysis. For all patients an abnormal chemistry panel and abnormal physical exam had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. Nine patients had a ci -IAI. Patients with a ci -IAI were more likely to have abdominal pain, tenderness on exam, and elevated hepatic enzymes. When patients were stratified by the presence of an abnormal chemistry or physical exam with or without microscopic hematuria, urinalysis did not improve the ability to identify patients with a ci -IAI. In fact, presence of microscopic hematuria increased the rate of false positives by 12%.

Conclusions: Microscopic hematuria was not a useful marker for ci -IAI and may lead to falsely assuming a more serious injury.

Objectives: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is a partner treatment strategy for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including gonorrhea and chlamydia as well as trichomoniasis in some states. The process allows healthcare providers to write prescriptions for STI treatment among partners of infected patients without a previous medical evaluation. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has recommended EPT as a useful option to facilitate partner treatment, particularly male partners of women with chlamydia or gonorrhea infections. Our institution implemented EPT in 2016 after Ohio legislation was passed to authorize its use. We aim to describe the implementation process and descriptive outcomes of EPT adoption in a pediatric emergency department.

Methods: This study describes use of the electronic health record for implementation of EPT in our institution. We conducted a retrospective review of EPT utilization from implementation. Electronic records from the implementation date of January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021, were reviewed. We describe basic demographics and overall uptake of the intervention. Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables and two-sample t-tests for continuous variables.

Results: There was a total of 3275 positive test results and 739 EPT prescriptions written. Adolescent patients who received prescriptions for EPT were more likely to be female (78.7% of all EPT prescriptions, P = 0.007) and older than other patients (average age 17.7 vs 17.4 years, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in race, insurance, or ethnicity among adolescent patients receiving and not receiving EPT. The percentage of positive STI tests associated with an EPT prescription ranged between 11.4% and 18.2%. Metronidazole was the most prescribed EPT medication.

Conclusions: The use of the electronic health record provides a platform for implementation of EPT. Our study highlights a potential strategy for increasing treatments of STIs through EPT prescribing in the emergency department setting.

Objectives: The Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN) is a validated overcrowding score shown to correlate well with staff assessment of adult emergency department (ED) overcrowding and the potential need for diversion. It derives from the number of staffed ED beds, attending physicians on duty, patients within each triage category, and admitted patients. To date, no study has validated EDWIN in a pediatric community ED setting. We aim to determine if EDWIN correlates with established overcrowding measures and provider perception of overcrowding within a freestanding, community-based pediatric ED.

Methods: In this prospective observational study at a freestanding, community-based pediatric ED, EDWIN was calculated hourly over 8 weeks throughout the year. EDWIN was compared with other objective and previously established ED metrics of overcrowding, including rates of patients who left without being seen (LWBS), average time from arrival to ED room, average length of stay (LOS), ED occupancy rates, and number of patients in the waiting room. Furthermore, EDWIN was compared with provider perception of overcrowding by surveying providers 6 times a day during the study period using novel, real-time, longitudinal, electronic health record-based survey distribution methodology. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to characterize the associations between EDWIN vs provider perception and EDWIN vs ED metrics. ANOVA and Tukey HSD were used to compare means of ED metrics of overcrowding across EDWIN severity categories.

Results: Five hundred eleven provider perception survey responses were collected from July 2022 through January 2023. EDWIN directly correlated with all measures of overcrowding, including provider perception of crowdedness (rho = 0.67), LWBS rates (rho = 0.44), average time from arrival to ED room (rho = 0.74), average LOS (rho = 0.70), ED occupancy rates (rho = 0.68), and number of patients in the waiting room (rho = 0.65). All findings were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EDWIN is an accurate tool to measure overcrowding in a freestanding, community-based pediatric ED.

Objectives: Simulating a realistic "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" (CICO) situation to train an "emergency front of neck airway" is difficult. It further remains unclear if provision of regular technical refreshers improves performance in the setting of a real CICO situation. The purpose of this prospective study on an established surgical rabbit cadaver tracheostomy model was to evaluate the benefit of viewing training material shortly before performing "emergency front of neck airway."

Methods: Previously trained participants were randomized into 2 groups. The control group (video) was allowed to watch an instructional video before performing a tracheotomy on the training model, while the study group (nonvideo) was not. Queried outcomes included success rate, performance time, and severe secondary airway injuries between the 2 groups.

Results: In 29 tracheotomies performed by 29 participants, the overall success rate was 86% (92% video; 81% nonvideo, P = 0.4). Performance time was not different between the 2 groups (video: 80 s [IQR25-75: 53-86], nonvideo 64 s [IQR25-75: 47-102]; P = 0.93). Only in the nonvideo group, the performance time and the time between the workshops correlated positively (P = 0.048). Severe secondary injuries were noted in 4 of 29 rabbit cadavers, 2 in each group. Watching a refresher video before performing an emergency surgical tracheostomy in an infant training model did not influence the success rate and the performance time in previously trained anesthetists.

Conclusions: These results highlight the ease of learning, memorization, and recall of this emergency surgical tracheostomy technique and may demonstrate its applicability in a real infant CICO situation.

Objectives: General emergency medicine (EM) physicians provide most pediatric emergency care in the United States, yet EM physicians feel underprepared to manage pediatric emergencies. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education during EM residency is variable, and learner preferences regarding educational experiences have not been widely explored through a qualitative lens. We aimed to better describe EM physicians' PEM educational needs and preferred teaching methods.

Methods: In 2021, as part of a survey querying senior EM residents and recent graduates from 8 diverse EM programs regarding perceived preparedness for PEM emergencies, educational needs and content delivery methods were assessed using 2 free-text questions. Qualitative analysis included deidentification and iterative coding of the data with double coding of 100% of the comments. We performed conventional content analysis of responses to identify emerging themes.

Results: The overall response rate for the survey was 53% (N = 129 out of 242 eligible participants) with 84 distinct free-text responses. Major themes included: 1) desire for education regarding neonates, infants, and critically ill children, especially airway management and 2) need for help translating lessons from PEM rotations to community EM practice. Respondents desired more autonomy during training. Their preferred PEM educational modality was simulation, and they appreciated online clinical pathways for just-in-time decision support.

Conclusions: This qualitative study of EM physicians proximal to training adds to a prior needs assessment by describing in detail desired pediatric content and preferred delivery. The findings can be used to better inform the development of PEM curricula for this group of EM physicians.

Objectives: In the United States, studies are inconclusive regarding the indications for polyvalent antivenom administration for crotaline envenomation. We compared polyvalent antivenom administration versus observation used at 2 separate institutions. We hypothesized that deferring antivenom leads to increased hospital length of stay and surgical interventions.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of children who presented to Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (LBCH) in Memphis, Tennessee, and Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) in Nashville, Tennessee, from 2009 to 2021. Patient demographics, treatment utilization, bite location, and outcomes from both sites were statistically examined.

Results: A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria (123 at LBCH, 60 at MCJCHV). At LBCH, mean age was 9.2 years, 54% were male, and 79% of known snakes identified as copperheads. At MCJCHV, mean age was 8.9 years, 65% were male, and 88% of known snakes identified as copperheads. The most commonly envenomated areas for both sites were the foot (42%), hand (27%), and ankle (26%). Patients at LBCH were managed with antivenom only 25% of the time, whereas 75% were observed; 82% of MCJCHV patients were managed with antivenom (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay (mean, 1.5 days at LBCH and 1.8 days at MCJCHV; P = 0.136) or surgical intervention (3.3% of LBCH encounters, 5.0% of MCJCHV encounters; P = 0.685). Secondary outcomes aside from coagulopathy and admission location (intensive care unit vs floor) were also not significant.

Conclusions: The use of antivenom did not impact hospital length of stay or surgical interventions. Our results should be interpreted cautiously as our study reflects regional experiences with snake species in the Southeast United States and not North America as a whole. Other institutional differences in management and smaller n at MCJCHV may have contributed to different outcomes. Further study is needed to determine intermediate and long-term effects of deferring antivenom use.

Abstract: Pediatric cardiac arrest is a rare but time-critical event that poses significant challenges to health care providers. Initiation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) early in resuscitation can help optimize the location of chest compressions, identify inadequate compressions, evaluate for sonographic pulse, and help direct management. Although several algorithms currently exist to incorporate POCUS into adult cardiac arrest, none, to our knowledge, currently exist for the pediatric population. We propose a novel protocol for POCUS use as an adjunct to existing standard-of-care measures in pediatric cardiac arrest, which we call the Pediatric Ultrasound for Life-Supporting Efforts protocol.

Background: While COVID-19 vaccine (CV) acceptance is improving, little is known about parental acceptance of CV in the pediatric emergency department (PED).

Objectives: The aims of the study are to assess rates of CV uptake among eligible children presenting to the PED, describe caregiver willingness to accept CV in the PED, and assess potential ED-based interventions to increase CV acceptance.

Methods: We surveyed caregivers of 384 children aged ≥6 months presenting to the PED for minor illness/injury. Demographics, COVID-19/other vaccine history, and intent/willingness to receive CV were recorded. Participants were recontacted by phone 6-12 months after vaccine eligibility to assess CV status, barriers to CV, willingness to receive CV in the ED, and preferences for ED-based vaccine-related interventions. Data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics.

Results: In initial surveys, 31.6% of caregivers planned to vaccinate their child; 32.2% would likely accept CV in the PED. Follow-up data was available for 302 (78.6%) previously unvaccinated participants; only 59 (19.5%) had received CV at follow-up. Of those unvaccinated at follow-up, 27 (28.7%) intended to vaccinate, nearly all of whom would accept CV in the PED. Factors associated with increased likelihood of vaccination included initial intent to vaccinate (P = 0.004), definite/probable acceptance of CV in the PED (P = 0.035), and child age 5+ (P = 0.005). Nearly one-fourth of unvaccinated families reported barriers to CV access. Interventions most likely to persuade families to vaccinate included: discussing CV with a provider (25.5%), receiving an information sheet (23.4%), and offering CV without an ED visit (22.3%).

Conclusions: CV acceptance was low in this cohort. A gap population of unvaccinated children whose caregivers intend to vaccinate exists, and many of these would accept CV in the ED. This data supports the presence of CV programs in the ED to close this gap.

Background: The pediatric emergency department (PED) is experiencing a rising volume of patients with mental health concerns, leading to prolonged boarding times and delays in initiating active therapeutic plans. A paucity of research exists for the self-reported pediatric patient experience during such boarding.

Objectives: To inform more individualized and patient-centered PED care for patients boarding for mental health admission, by learning the prior trauma experiences and patient perspective on prolonged PED mental health stays.

Methods: A convenience sample was collected at an urban hospital's PED among those boarding for mental health emergency greater than 24 hours. Demographic information, exposures to past trauma, and perceptions on and understanding of their care experience, were discussed. Descriptive and thematic content analysis were used for data analysis.

Results: A total of 99 youths were included in the study and the majority reported worsening mental health symptoms during PED boarding, notably increasing anxiety (72 [72.7%]). Patients were equivocal on efficacy of PED mental health intake on symptoms (41 [41.4%]). Personal suggestions were offered by these patients to guide the care of future children that would better mitigate their symptoms while boarding in the PED, such as group activities, electronics, and physical activity.

Discussion: Patients in mental health crisis boarding in the PED have already experienced stressful life events. By listening to the personal stories of this vulnerable population, the PED can improve care delivery and design a more therapeutic environment, especially as the need for acute mental health management continues to increase.

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in the emergency department (ED) may facilitate the diagnosis of nonsurgical sources of abdominal pain after surgical causes are excluded. Identifying mesenteric adenitis is a feasible PoCUS application due to its ease of use and speed. However, there are scant data regarding the diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis by PoCUS. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and interobserver agreement of mesenteric adenitis identified on PoCUS in pediatric patients with nonsurgical abdominal pain.

Methods: This was a retrospective review at a tertiary-care, urban pediatric ED. All cases of mesenteric adenitis diagnosed on PoCUS from January 2018 to August 2022 were reviewed. Demographics and clinical data, including relevant outcomes, were recorded. All PoCUS videos were reviewed by a senior sonologist-physician for determination of mesenteric adenitis in children 21 years and younger with nonsurgical abdominal pain. Interobserver agreement by Cohen κ was calculated between experienced and novice physician sonologists blinded to diagnosis, who reviewed 77 six-second video clips for presence or absence of mesenteric adenitis.

Results: Thirty-three subjects were identified by PoCUS to have mesenteric adenitis in the setting of nonsurgical abdominal pain presenting to our ED. Most common indications for PoCUS were for suspected appendicitis, suspected intussusception, or undifferentiated abdominal pain. Forty-six percent of patients were male; median age was 9 years (interquartile range, 4-14 years). On 4-week clinical follow-up, 1 patient returned to our ED with a surgical abdomen. Cohen κ values were 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.97) between experienced sonologist-physicians and 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-.90) between novice and experienced sonologist-physicians.

Conclusions: PoCUS can identify mesenteric adenitis, typically a diagnosis of exclusion, in pediatric patients with nonsurgical abdominal pain, both by novice and experienced physician-sonologists. Use of PoCUS may help ED clinicians identify a common cause of nonsurgical abdominal pain in children.