Objectives: Chest tube thoracostomy site selection is typically chosen through landmark identification of the fifth intercostal space (ICS). Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), studies have shown this site to be potentially unsafe in many adults; however, no study has evaluated this in children. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the fifth ICS for pediatric chest tube placement, with the secondary aim to identify patient factors that correlate with an unsafe fifth ICS.
Methods: This was an observational study using POCUS to evaluate the safety of the fifth ICS for chest tube thoracostomy placement using a convenience sample of pediatric emergency department patients. Safety was defined as the absence of the diaphragm appearing within or above the fifth ICS during either tidal or maximal respiration. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify patient factors that correlated with an unsafe fifth ICS.
Results: Among all patients, 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.45-16.1) of diaphragm measurements crossed into or above the fifth ICS during tidal respiration and 27.2% (95% CI 19.0-37.3) during maximal respiration. The diaphragm crossed the fifth ICS more frequently on the right when compared with the left, with an overall rate of 45.0% (95% CI 36.1-54.3) of right diaphragms crossing during maximal respiration. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, a 1-kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was associated with an increase of 10% or more in the odds of crossing during both tidal and maximal respiration ( P = 0.003 or less).
Conclusions: A significant number of pediatric patients have diaphragms that cross into or above the fifth ICS, suggesting that placement of a chest tube thoracostomy at this site would pose a significant complication risk. POCUS can quickly and accurately identify these unsafe sites, and we recommend it be used before pediatric chest tube thoracostomy.
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the association between prolonged time in the COVID-19 pandemic and rates of positive routine suicide screens among youth accessing healthcare in the pediatric emergency department.
Methods: Participants were English- and Spanish-speaking youth aged 10-18 years presenting without an acute mental/behavioral health concern to the emergency department or urgent care of a large hospital system, serving a 7-state region, who completed routine screening for suicide risk. Visits between March 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021 were included. We conducted a quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis and categorized visits into the prepandemic year, COVID-19 year 1 (Y1), and COVID-19 year 2 (Y2). The primary outcome measure was rate of positive suicide screen.
Results: A total of 33,504 children completed routine suicide screening; 2689 children had a positive screen. The overall rate of positive suicide screens increased throughout the pandemic compared with baseline (7.5% prepandemic, 8.4% Y1, 9.3% Y2; P < 0.01). Rates of positive suicide screens in Y1 increased 0.04% per week and surpassed prepandemic rates, then decreased 0.1% per week throughout Y2 ( P < 0.01), during a time when social distancing mitigation efforts decreased.
Conclusions: Cumulative time in the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased positive suicide screens in children. School reopening and normalization of social routines preceded an observed negative trend in rates of positive suicide screens in Y2 of the pandemic. This study demonstrates fluctuating trends in suicide screen positivity, potentially influenced by social distancing and public health measures. Our study may support that maintaining social connectedness and access to school-based or community resources may be a protective factor for youth suicide risk during a pandemic or other natural occurrence.
Objectives: This study aims to assess the current state of advanced pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training in North America, including trends in dedicated PEM POCUS fellowships and alternative advanced POCUS training pathways, to better guide future educational efforts within the field.
Methods: We identified and surveyed 22 PEM POCUS fellowship directors across the United States and Canada regarding PEM POCUS fellowship application trends, potential barriers to pursuing additional POCUS training, and novel training models that meet the needs of the PEM POCUS workforce.
Results: The past 5 years have seen a growth in both PEM POCUS fellowship program number and trainee positions available, with a general impression by fellowship directors of a high demand for faculty who have these training credentials. However, there was a discordant drop in fellowship applicants and corresponding match rate in 2022, the cause of which is not clear. A number of programs are offering alternative advanced training options including combined PEM/POCUS fellowships and POCUS tracks within PEM fellowship.
Conclusion: As POCUS use within PEM evolves, a growing number of advanced training options are being developed. Understanding the motivations and barriers for pursuing advanced POCUS training can help to shape these options going forward, to ensure the experience incorporated within each model meets the needs of trainees, the needs of PEM divisions, and the future needs of our field.
Objectives: Pediatric head trauma is a frequent reason for presentation to the emergency department. Despite this, there are few reports on specific characteristics and injury patterns in head injured children. The goal of this study was to evaluate head injury patterns in children with blunt head injury and their prevalence by age group.
Methods: This is a planned secondary analysis of the NEXUS II Head CT validation study. Consecutive patients with blunt head trauma were enrolled between 2006 and 2015. Demographics and criteria from 2 clinical decision instruments (NEXUS and Canadian Head CT rules) were gathered at the time of enrollment. We abstracted and cataloged injuries for pediatric patients based on radiologist report. Frequencies of injuries and severity were analyzed by developmental age group.
Results: A total of 1018 pediatric patients were enrolled, 128 (12.6%) of whom had an injury on computed tomography scan. Median age was 11.9 (Interquartile range 4.5-15.5) for all patients and 12 (4.8-15.5) for injured patients. Of injured patients, 49 (38.3%) had a significant injury, and 27 (21.1%) received an intervention. Teenagers had the highest rate of significant injury (50%) and intervention (30%). Injuries were most frequently noted in the temporal (46.1%), frontal (45.3%), and parietal (45.3%) regions. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (29.7%) and subdural hematoma (28.9%) were the most common injuries observed.Intraparenchymal hemorrhage and cerebral edema were more prevalent in older age groups. The most common injury mechanism overall was fall from height (24.7%). Motor vehicle accidents and nonmotorized wheeled vehicle accidents were more common in older patients.
Conclusions: Serious injuries requiring intervention were rarely encountered in pediatric patients experiencing blunt head trauma. Mechanisms of injury, type of injury, and rates of intervention varied between developmental age groups.
Background: Although the reporting rate of child abuse is increasing every year, the child abuse detection rate is 3.81% as of 2019 in Korea, which is significantly lower than that of developed countries for child rights.
Objective: We investigated the associated factors with barriers that emergency physicians face in recognizing and reporting cases of child abuse.
Methods: From May to July 2022, 240 emergency physicians working in the 15 emergency department were asked to participate in the survey via email. The questionnaire included the respondent's basic information, treatment experience for child abuse, reasons for reporting or not reporting, and opinions on measures to increase the reporting rate. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to discern the factors contributing to underreporting.
Results: Seventy-one individuals were included in the analysis, after excluding those who had never encountered suspected cases of child abuse. A multivariable logistic regression was performed with the above variables, and although it was not statistically significant, there was a tendency for workers to report well when working at a pediatric emergency department (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.97 [0.98-16.09]). The primary reason for reporting suspected abuse was the pattern of damage suspected of abuse. The first reason for not reporting suspected abuse was because they were not sure it was child abuse. Respondents answered that to report better, a quick and appropriate response from the police and confidentiality of the reporter were needed.
Conclusions: Physicians in pediatric emergency departments demonstrated a tendency for more proactive reporting suspected cases of child abuse.
Objectives: Many children who require hospitalization are ideal candidates for care in pediatric observation units (POUs) rather than inpatient pediatric units. Differences in outcomes between children cared for in these 2 practice settings have not been thoroughly evaluated.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, children aged 0 to 18 years admitted to a POU at a community hospital or inpatient unit at a children's hospital were enrolled if they met specific clinical criteria. Information regarding the current illness, medical history, and hospital course was collected. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was analyzed as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included conversion to inpatient care for the POU group and return to pediatric emergency department within 7 days. Subgroup analysis was conducted on children presenting with respiratory illnesses. Propensity scores were used as a predictor in the final model.
Results: One hundred eighty-one admissions, 92 to POU and 89 to an inpatient unit, were analyzed. Mean LOS was 24.4 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.7-27.1) for observation and 43.2 hours (95% CI, 37.8-48.6) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Among the 126 children admitted for respiratory illnesses, the mean LOS was 32.3 hours (95% CI, 26.0-38.6) for observation and 48.1 hours (95% CI, 42.2-54.0) for inpatient ( P < 0.01). Survival analysis demonstrated a 1.61 (95% CI, 1.07-2.42) fold shorter time to discharge among children admitted to observation compared with inpatient ( P = 0.02) and a 1.70 (95% CI, 1.07-2.71) fold shorter time to discharge from observation compared with inpatient for respiratory illnesses ( P = 0.03). Within 7 days of discharge, 2 (2%) patients from the observation group and 1 (1%) from the inpatient group returned to the pediatric emergency department.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that POU may provide the means toward efficient care for children in community settings with illnesses requiring brief hospitalizations. Future work including prospective investigations is needed to ascertain the generalizability of these findings.
Objectives: Youth suicide is a pressing global concern. Prior research has developed evidence-driven clinical pathways to screen and identify suicide risk among pediatric patients in outpatient clinics, emergency departments (ED) and inpatient hospital units. However, the feasibility of implementing these pathways remains to be established. Here, we share the results of a hospital-wide "youth suicide risk screening pathway" implementation trial at an urban academic pediatric hospital to address this gap.
Methods: A 3-tier "youth suicide risk screening pathway" using The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was implemented for patients aged 10 to 26 years who received care at an urban academic pediatric hospital's emergency department or inpatient units. We retrospectively reviewed implementation outcomes of this pathway from January 1 to August 31, 2019. The feasibility of this implementation was measured by assessing the pathway's degree of execution, fidelity, resource utilization, and acceptability.
Results: Of 4108 eligible patient encounters, 3424 (83%) completed the screen. Forty-eight (1%) screened acute positive, 263 (8%) screened nonacute positive and 3113 (91%) screened negative. Patients reporting positive suicide risk were more likely to be older and female, although more males required specialty mental health evaluations. Pathway fidelity was 83% among all positive screens and 94% among acute positive screens. The clinical pathway implementation required 16 hours of provider training time and was associated with slightly longer length of stay for inpatients that screened positive (4 vs 3 days). Sixty-five percent of nurses and 78% of social work providers surveyed supported participation in this effort.
Conclusions: It is feasible to implement a youth suicide risk screening pathway without overburdening the system at an urban academic pediatric hospital.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of adverse events of ketamine administration in the pediatric emergency department in patients aged 90 days or younger in order to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of administration in this patient population.
Methods: An 8-year retrospective chart review of patients aged 90 days or younger who received ketamine in the pediatric emergency department was conducted. All patients who met the age criteria were included in this study. Identified routes of ketamine administration included oral, intramuscular, and intravenous.
Results: Fourteen patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The median age was 45 days old. Indications for ketamine administration included 7 cases for procedural sedation, 5 cases for RSI, and 2 cases for postintubation sedation. The average dose amount (mg/kg) of ketamine administered was 10, 4.43, and 1.59 for oral, intramuscular, and intravenous routes, respectively. Of the 14 patients, 1 patient was identified to have an adverse event to ketamine administration. A transient desaturation and bradycardic event due to laryngospasm was observed during laryngoscopy performed for RSI that was resolved with administration of anticholinergics and paralytics as well as successful intubation and ventilation.
Conclusions: In this study, 1 patient suffered an adverse event due to laryngospasm during intubation. In the pediatric population, the incidence of adverse events of ketamine administration has been found to be variable in the current literature, ranging from 0.71% to 7.26%. In our study, an adverse event occurred in 1 out of 14 administrations (7.1%). The incidence of adverse events associated with ketamine administration in our patients aged 90 days or less appeared to be similar to that reported in the general pediatric population.