Pediatric emergency care最新文献

Objectives: Clinical event debriefing (CED) improves healthcare team performance and patient outcomes. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians do not receive formal training in leading CED. Our objectives were to develop a CED curriculum and evaluate its effect on performance, knowledge, comfort, and clinical practice.

Methods: This was a single group pre-post-retention study. We developed a hybrid curriculum with simulation, an interactive module, and individual feedback. We invited faculty and fellows from the PEM division of our hospital to participate. During an in-person training day, participants led standardized clinical simulation scenarios followed by simulated CED with immediate feedback on their leadership performance. They watched an interactive module between scenarios. Participants returned for a retention assessment 2-6 months later with a third simulation and debrief. Participants completed surveys measuring attitudes, experiences, and knowledge. Participants also evaluated the curriculum.The primary outcome was CED leadership performance using a novel 21-item tool that we developed, the Debrief Leadership Tool for Assessment (DELTA). A blinded, trained rater measured performance with DELTA. Secondary outcomes included changes in knowledge and comfort and changes in clinical practice.

Results: Twenty-seven participants enrolled and completed all parts of the curriculum and assessments. Debrief leadership performance improved by a mean of 3.7 points on DELTA pre-training to post-training (95% confidence interval = 2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01) and by 1.4 points from pre-training to retention (95% confidence interval = 0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03). Knowledge and comfort also significantly improved from pre-training to post-training and were sustained at retention. Most (67%) participants changed their clinical practice of CED after completing the curriculum. All participants would recommend the training to other PEM physicians.

Conclusions: A hybrid simulation-based curriculum in leading CED for PEM physicians was associated with improvement in CED leadership performance, knowledge, and comfort. PEM physicians incorporated training into their clinical practice.

Objectives: Each year, 5.3 million children under 5 years of age die in low-resource settings, often due to delayed recognition of disease severity, inadequate treatment, or a lack of supplies. We describe the use of a comprehensive digital facility-readiness survey tool, recently developed by the Pediatric Sepsis Data CoLaboratory, which aims to identify target areas for quality improvement related to pediatric emergency and critical care.

Methods: Facility-readiness surveys were conducted at six sub-Saharan African hospitals providing pediatric emergency and critical care in Uganda (n = 4) and Cameroon (n = 2). The tool is a 2-phase survey to assess readiness to provide pediatric essential emergency and critical care: (1) an "environmental scan," focusing on infrastructure, availability, and functionality of resources, and (2) an "observational scan" assessing the quality and safety of care through direct observation of patients receiving treatment for common diseases. Data were captured in a mobile application and the findings analyzed descriptively.

Results: Varying levels of facility readiness to provide pediatric emergency care were observed. Only 1 of 6 facilities had a qualified staff member to assess children for danger signs upon arrival, and only 2 of 6 had staff with skills to manage emergency conditions. Only 21% of essential medicines required for pediatric emergency and critical care were available at all six facilities. Most facilities had clean running water and soap or disinfectants, but most also experienced interruptions to their electricity supply. Less than half of patients received an appropriate discharge note and fewer received counseling on postdischarge care; follow-up was arranged in less than a quarter of cases.

Conclusions: These pilot findings indicate that facilities are partially equipped and ready to provide pediatric emergency and critical care. This facility-readiness tool can be utilized in low-resource settings to assist hospital administrators and policymakers to determine priority areas to improve quality of care for the critically ill child.

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine the epidemiology, cost, and factors associated with hospital admission, deterioration if hospitalized, and mortality for children with a history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) presenting to pediatric emergency departments (EDs).

Study design: Using the Pediatric Health Information System, we performed a retrospective analysis of ED encounters of children ≤17 years old with clinically significant CVD between 2016 and 2021. Patients were included if they had a cardiovascular complex chronic condition, defined by ICD diagnosis, and procedure codes. We assessed the primary diagnosis, admission rate, ICU transfer rate (as a marker of disease progression), mortality, resource utilization, and costs. We conducted multivariable analyses to identify risk factors for admission, ICU transfer, and mortality.

Results: There were 201,551 ED visits (mean 33,592 ± 3354 per year) among 129,938 children with clinically significant CVD. Most ED encounters had a primary diagnosis of a circulatory (21.1%) or respiratory (19.7%) illness. Seventy-six percent of visits had at least one blood test or imaging study conducted. The overall admission rate was 59.7%, with 28.7% admitted to the ICU, and 6.2% transferred to the ICU after the first 24 hours. The median costs for encounters resulting in admission were $13,605 in US 2023 dollars. In multivariable analyses, younger age, a greater number of noncardiac complex chronic conditions, and CVD type were associated with increased odds of admission, ICU transfer after 24 hours, and mortality (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: ED visits for children with clinically significant CVD lead to substantial resource utilization, including frequent hospitalization, ICU level of care, and costs. This baseline data aids in the development of prospective studies to inform the appropriate ED management for children with clinically significant CVD.

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the current status of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), perceptions, education, training, and barriers to using POCUS in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Turkey.

Methods: A descriptive, multicenter, cross-sectional study through an online survey was developed using the REDCap online platform. The survey was distributed through the Turkish Society of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care e-mail group. Each survey was answered only once by each PED/PICU and by the clinical chief of the department.

Results: A total of 19 PEDs and 26 PICUs responded to the survey. Among them, 84.2% of PEDs and 100% of PICUs reported the clinical use of POCUS. For diagnostic applications, the most common areas for PEDs and PICUs were thoracic (93.7%/100%) and cardiovascular (62.5%/65.4%) assessment, and in the procedural use of POCUS, the most frequent applications were those for vascular access (75.0%/92.3%) and thoracentesis (31.2%/65.4%). The most commonly reported clinical benefits were rapid diagnosis, rapid treatment, and decreased complications during procedural applications for PEDs and PICUs. Evaluating the barriers to POCUS use in PEDs and PICUs, the most common reasons for insufficient use were the lack of ultrasound machines and/or equipment, a shortage of manpower, lack of awareness, and lack of training. For PEDs (68.4%) and for PICUs (84.6%), participants agreed that POCUS training should be mandatory during fellowship programs.

Conclusions: Most participants were aware of the need for POCUS. However, lack of education, equipment, manpower, and infrastructure still emerged as barriers to the use of POCUS. To further promote POCUS use, it would be helpful to improve accessibility by ensuring sufficient numbers of ultrasound devices together with sufficient numbers of appointed physicians and by expanding POCUS education in PEDs and PICUs.

Purpose/objectives: The U.S. health care system is experiencing a critical workforce shortage of nurse case managers exacerbated by an older workforce and looming retirements and the growth of this specialty. This quality improvement project aimed to develop an online case manager preceptor training program and examine its impact on the nurse case manager preceptors' self-efficacy.

Practice setting: This project was implemented at a 395-bed acute care, community-based hospital in the northeast.

Methodology and sample: The target population for the intervention included a convenience sample of 13 nurse case managers who were assigned a preceptor role. The intervention was an abbreviated version of an online preceptorship program by Lippincott. The Preceptor Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96, measured nurse preceptors' confidence in various skills including fostering critical thinking and providing feedback. Data from pre- and post-intervention PSEQ surveys were analyzed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test in SPSS version 28.

Results: The Wilcoxon rank sum test revealed a statistically significant improvement in preceptor confidence scores ( p = .043) between pre- and post-intervention PSEQ results.

Implications for case management practice: This project demonstrated feasibility of an online nurse case manager preceptor training program while also identifying improved preceptors' self-efficacy. Future research can include investigating the impact of a preceptor training program on the nurse case manager learners receiving role training from the trained case manager preceptor.

Objective: Our objective was to identify the hospital- and community-related factors associated with the hospital-level rate of potentially unnecessary interfacility transfers (IFTs) for pediatric patients with asthma exacerbations.

Methods: We analyzed California Emergency Department (ED) data from 2016 to 2019 to capture ED visits where a pediatric patient (age, 2-17 years) presented with an asthma exacerbation and was transferred to another ED or acute care hospital. The primary outcome was hospital-level rate of potentially unnecessary IFTs, defined as a visit where length of stay after transfer was <24 hours and no advanced services (eg, critical care) were used. Hospital- and community-related characteristics included urbanicity, teaching hospital status, availability of pediatric resources in the sending facility and patient's community, pediatric patient volume, and Social Vulnerability Index. We described and compared hospitals in the top quartile of potentially unnecessary IFT rate versus all others and used a multivariable modified Poisson model to identify factors associated with potentially unnecessary IFT.

Results: A total of 325 sending hospitals were included, with a median 573 pediatric asthma visits (interquartile range, 183-1309) per hospital annually. Nearly half of the hospitals (145/325, 45%) sent a potentially unnecessary IFT. Most (90%) hospitals were urban, 9% were teaching hospitals, 5% had >500 beds, and 22% had a pediatric ED on-site. Factors associated with higher adjusted prevalence of potentially unnecessary IFT included availability of pediatric telehealth (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.0), increased pediatric volume (eg, <1800 vs ≥10,000 visits: PR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.7), and higher community Social Vulnerability Index (PR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9).

Conclusions: Several hospital- and community-related factors were associated with potentially unnecessary IFTs among pediatric patients presenting to the ED with asthma exacerbations. These findings provide insight into disparities in potentially unnecessary IFT across communities and can guide the development of future interventions.

Introduction: Amphetamine poisoning in children is a significant public health concern due to its potential for severe adverse effects on physical and mental health. In this article, we describe a case series of 29 children under the age of 14 presenting with sympathomimetic toxidrome due to confirmed amphetamine poisoning.

Material and method: In this cross-sectional study, children (1 month to 14 years old) who were hospitalized in the emergency and pediatric departments of Imam Reza and Akbar Hospital in Mashhad from the beginning of April 2021 to September 2022 were identified with the diagnosis of amphetamine poisoning. Their demographic, clinical, and paraclinical (laboratory and electrocardiogram) information, which was included in the relevant checklists, were analyzed and reported.

Findings: Out of 29 children included in the study, 18 (62%) were male and the rest were female. The average age of children was 44.75 ±43.9 months; most of them were less than 4 years old. In all patients, glasgow coma scale (GCS) was 15. In 25.92% of cases (8 patients) blood pressure was above the 90% percentile for age and sex, 82.60% (24 cases) were tachycardia, 72.41% crying (21 cases), 86.20% were restless (25 cases), 10.34% tremor (3 cases), 10.34% had body pain (3 cases), and 6.89% (2 cases) had delusions. None of the subjects had a seizure. The serum level of creatine phosphokinase was on average 771.99 ± 966 units/L. All children had an increase in creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and 25.9% of children had an increase in CPK to more than 1000 units/L.

Conclusion: Based on the results, in children with symptoms such as restlessness, crying, and tachycardia, poisoning with amphetamine group substances should be included in the differential diagnosis list, and also measuring CPK and investigating the possible occurrence of rhabdomyolysis in cases of poisoning of children with amphetamine seems necessary.

Objectives: Over the past decade, there has been a significant effort to decrease radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients. The objective of this study was to determine if trauma centers (TCs) and nontrauma centers (non-TCs) are practicing in line with this effort. We hypothesized that TCs would demonstrate a significant decrease in the use of chest computed tomography (CT) during the study period, whereas non-TC would show no change in chest CT use.

Methods: We queried a state-wide database from 2010 to 2020 for pediatric trauma encounters at TCs and non-TCs within a single large health system. All transfer encounters were excluded. Chest CTs and chest radiographs (CXRs) were performed, and injury diagnosis codes were extracted for each encounter. Chest CT use and incidence of thoracic injuries were compared between TCs and non-TCs.

Results: A total of 13,014 encounters were included, of which 85.8% occurred at TCs and 14.2% occurred at non-TCs. There were significant differences between TC and non-TC encounter demographics. During the study period, the percentage of trauma encounters in which chest CT was obtained increased yearly at both TCs and non-TCs. Among encounters where both modalities were performed in the first 24 hours, chest CT was performed before CXR in 0.4% of TC and 0.1% of non-TC encounters ( P = 0.086). Among encounters without thoracic injury, chest CT was performed in 5.2% of cases at non-TCs and 4.5% of cases at TCs ( P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In the trauma encounters studied, chest CT was performed prior to CXR more frequently at TCs compared to non-TCs. These data may reflect regional trauma triage protocols, availability of chest CT, or differences in education between institutions. Whereas TCs may see more severely injured patients more frequently, education regarding conservative CT imaging principles should be reinforced through multidisciplinary efforts.

Objectives: At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were performed.

Results: One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after ( P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients.

Conclusions: Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.