In the context of key population HIV testing programmes, identifying new HIV acquisitions, tracking incidence, and responding with prevention and treatment interventions will be critical for achieving HIV epidemic control. Laboratory tests for recently acquired HIV used as part of a “recent infection testing algorithm” (RITA), offer a potential tool to support this work. We implemented a RITA for female sex workers (FSWs) in Zimbabwe to explore opportunities and programmatic benefits.
Between October 2021 and January 2023, recency testing was offered to FSWs attending the Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) Zimbabwe's key populations programme. Dried blood spot (DBS) samples were taken at 86 clinic sites across 10 provinces and Laboratory LAg Avidity and viral load testing conducted. RITA results were analysed and linked to programme data to explore geographical differences and calculate HIV incidence. We describe concurrent efforts in HIV testing for social (social network testing [SNT]) and sexual (index case testing [ICT]) contacts of those testing HIV positive.
Among 24,976 FSWs tested at programme sites, 9.5% (2363/24,976) were confirmed HIV positive. We enrolled 55.5% (1311/2363) of eligible HIV-positive FSWs to our study, of whom 11.7% (153/1311) were identified as having recently acquired HIV. It took a median of 37 days (IQR 20–67) for samples to be processed. Enrolment rates varied between provinces but the proportion of recently acquired HIV was similar (range: 18.4% to 4.0%). Overall HIV incidence was 3.4 (95% CI 2.7−4.0) per 100py. Where results could be linked to routinely collected data, we found no evidence of a difference in test-positivity between the ICT and SNT contacts of those with recently acquired compared to those with long-term HIV.
Implementation of a RITA was possible within a nationally scaled sex worker programme, and while challenging to implement, can provide an understanding of transmission dynamics and HIV incidence in this context. Sub-optimal recruitment and data linkage limited the interpretation of our findings and opportunities for strategic gains though focusing on HIV prevention efforts.
Tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT) is recommended for people living with HIV (PLHIV) in high TB burden settings. While 6 months of daily isoniazid remains widely used, shorter regimens are now available. However, little is known about preferences of PLHIV for key features of TPT regimens.
From July to November 2022, we conducted a discrete choice experiment among adult PLHIV engaged in care at an urban HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda. Participants chose between two hypothetical TPT regimens with five different features (pills per dose, frequency, duration, need for adjusted antiretroviral therapy [ART] dosage and side effects), organized across nine random choice tasks. We analysed preferences using hierarchical Bayesian estimation, latent class analysis and willingness-to-trade simulations.
Of 400 PLHIV, 392 (median age 44, 72% female, 91% TPT-experienced) had high-quality choice task responses. Pills per dose was the most important attribute (relative importance 32.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31.6–33.2), followed by frequency (20.5% [95% CI 19.7–21.3]), duration (19.5% [95% CI 18.6–20.5]) and need for ART dosage adjustment (18.2% [95% CI 17.2–19.2]). Latent class analysis identified three preference groups: one prioritized less frequent, weekly dosing (N = 222; 57%); another was averse to ART dosage adjustment (N = 107; 27%); and the last prioritized short regimens with fewer side effects (N = 63; 16%). All groups highly valued fewer pills per dose. Overall, participants were willing to accept a regimen of 2.8 months’ additional duration [95% CI: 2.4–3.2] to reduce pills per dose from five to one, 3.6 [95% CI 2.4–4.8] months for weekly rather than daily dosing and 2.2 [95% CI 1.3–3.0] months to avoid ART dosage adjustment.
To align with preferences of PLHIV in Uganda, decision-makers should prioritize the development and implementation of TPT regimens with fewer pills, less frequent dosing and no need for ART dosage adjustment, rather than focus primarily on duration of treatment.
HIV transmission is ongoing in both high- and low-resource settings. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) remains an important tool in preventing HIV; however, PEP is significantly underutilized. The multitude of barriers to PEP implementation include low patient and provider awareness and acceptability, limited access to treatment and prevention services, and high rates of stigma. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently released updated guidance on the delivery of HIV PEP. This commentary aims to highlight the salient changes, evaluate how such recommendations can overcome the existing barriers to PEP implementation and discuss strategies needed to put the updated guidance into practice.
The 2024 WHO PEP guidelines continue a trend towards increasing access to PEP. Most notably, the WHO now provides strong recommendations that: (1) PEP be delivered in community settings (e.g. pharmacies, police stations and online platforms), and (2) PEP delivery and monitoring be done via task sharing involving non-specialist health workers (e.g. pharmacists or community health workers). The guidelines also emphasize that the PEP encounter is an important educable moment whereby a transition to pre-exposure prophylaxis among individuals at continued risk for HIV infection should be discussed. The decentralization of PEP delivery has the potential to overcome numerous barriers to PEP implementation, reduce time to initiation and support adherence with the 28-day course. To translate the recommendations into delivery programmes, however, much more work is needed. Detailed templates can help overcome the heterogeneity of both the community settings in which PEP can now be provided and the populations (e.g. survivors of sexual assault, healthcare workers, sex workers, etc.) among whom PEP may be indicated. Training of the workforce will be essential, which should include, as emphasized by the WHO, training in trauma-based care. Novel formulations of and delivery mechanisms for PEP are also emerging, and how such iterations can synergize with decentralized PEP delivery programmes remains to be seen.
The updated WHO PEP guidelines make major strides towards increasing access to PEP. Realization of such aims will require ongoing evaluation and support given the heterogeneity in who benefits most from PEP.
Key populations (KPs) including female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men (MSM) in sub-Saharan Africa are disproportionately impacted by HIV. Despite the increasing availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), data on retention remain limited. This study assessed PrEP retention at 1 and 12 months among Rwandan FSWs and MSM.
We analysed routine clinical data on adult FSWs and MSM receiving PrEP care from 11 health facilities in Kigali, Rwanda between 2019 and 2022. Retention was defined as attendance at regularly scheduled appointments for a PrEP refill. We used logistic regression to assess associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and retention at 1 and 12 months.
Among 2043 PrEP initiators, 1343 (66%) were FSWs and 700 (34%) were MSM. FSWs reported a median number of eight sexual partners in the prior 7 days, 70% reported condomless sex and 94% considered themselves at high HIV risk. About 1239 (92%) and 1032 (77%) were retained at 1 and 12 months, respectively. One-month retention was lower among FSWs living with others (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35−0.99; ref: living alone) or with low HIV risk perception (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04−0.29). At 12 months, low HIV risk perception remained statistically significant (aOR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12−0.32). At PrEP initiation, MSM reported a median of four sexual partners in the prior 12 months, 88% reported condomless sex and 72% considered themselves at high HIV risk. Retention rates were 96% at 1 month and 82% at 12 months. At 1 month, retention was higher among MSM with some education (OR 12.74, 95% CI: 2.74−70.93; ref: no education). At 12 months, retention was lower among MSM with part-time employment (aOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.76), students (aOR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.37) and unemployed (aOR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.28); ref: full-employed) and those unaware of PrEP at baseline (aOR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.23).
We observed very high rates of PrEP retention among Rwandan FSWs and MSM. Predictors of retention included living situation, employment status, HIV risk perception and low PrEP awareness, but differed between FSWs and MSM. These findings suggest that targeted awareness campaigns tailored to different KPs could improve PrEP retention in care.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a common drug of choice for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or as a combination HIV treatment for pregnant women. In-utero exposure to TDF was found to be associated with lower bone mineral content (BMC) in HIV-exposed uninfected neonates. Data for infants born to women taking TDF-PrEP are lacking. The CAP016 randomized control trial was conducted in South Africa between September 2017 and August 2021 and pregnant women either initiated TDF/FTC PrEP in pregnancy (Immediate PrEP arm-IP) or at cessation of breastfeeding (Deferred PrEP arm-DP). In a secondary data analysis, we evaluated BMC in HIV-unexposed infants in the CAP016 trial in the first 18 months of life in association with maternal TDF-PrEP use during pregnancy.
Infants born to women randomized to the IP arm or DP arm in the CAP016 clinical trial had BMC measurements of the whole body with head (WBH) and lumbar spine (LS) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks.
Of 481 infants born to women enrolled in the CAP016 clinical trial, 335 (69.6%) infants had a minimum of one DXA scan of the WBH and LS between 6 and 74 weeks of age (168 IP and 167 DP). Women in the IP arm received TDF-FTC PreP for a median of 19 weeks between initiation in pregnancy and delivery. Using a mixed linear regression model and adjusted for gestational age, sex and ever-breastfed, the mean difference (95% CI) for BMC of the WBH between IP and DP arms were −0.74 (−8.69 to 7.20), −1.26 (−10.75 to 8.23), −9.17 (−20.02 to 1.69) and 5.02 (−6.74 to 16.78) g at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks (p = 0.283). Mean differences in BMC of the LS were 0.07 (−0.10 to 0.23), 0.02 (−0.18 to 0.22), −0.14 (−0.36 to 0.09) and 0.14 (−0.11 to 0.38) g at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks, respectively (p = 0.329).
In a randomized controlled trial, there were no differences in BMC of the WBH and LS between infants exposed to in-utero TDF-FTC PrEP and unexposed infants in the first 18 months of life.