Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1037/ser0000943
Lucinda B Leung, Sona Hovsepian, Karen E Dyer, Catherine E Brayton, Alexander S Young, Stacey Pollack, Jodie Trafton, Alison B Hamilton
Depression can be effectively treated with internet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT). The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provided cCBT free to all veterans nationally as of 2013; however, its uptake has been limited. This study aimed to examine VHA primary care clinicians' and patients' perspectives regarding cCBT treatment for depression. We conducted semistructured interviews with 12 primary care clinicians (September-November 2020) and four focus groups involving 15 patients with depression (March-May 2021). Interview guides were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; questions addressed depression treatment barriers and facilitators, cCBT awareness and acceptability, target patient population for cCBT, and integration into depression management pathways. Data were analyzed for overarching themes using matrix analysis techniques. Few primary care clinicians and patients were aware of cCBT and its availability for veterans. Clinicians stressed the importance of identifying appropriate patients for cCBT use, specifically veterans with mild-to-moderate severity depression. Clinicians believed cCBT could potentially engage patients in depression treatment who may not otherwise engage and envisioned cCBT use to be guided by integrated VHA mental health personnel. Patients spoke of multiple treatment barriers (e.g., long wait times) and, correspondingly, viewed cCBT as facilitating access to mental health treatment. While patients raised some technical questions, they expressed interest in cCBT. Though relatively unknown to participants, cCBT was widely perceived to be acceptable and with the potential to increase access to depression treatment within VHA primary care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
基于互联网的计算机认知行为疗法(cCBT)可以有效地治疗抑郁症。自2013年起,退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)向全国所有退伍军人免费提供cCBT;然而,它的吸收是有限的。本研究旨在探讨VHA初级保健医生和患者对cCBT治疗抑郁症的看法。我们对12名初级保健临床医生(2020年9月至11月)和4个涉及15名抑郁症患者的焦点小组(2021年3月至5月)进行了半结构化访谈。利用执行研究综合框架编制了访谈指南;问题涉及抑郁症治疗的障碍和促进因素,cCBT的认识和可接受性,cCBT的目标患者人群,以及抑郁症管理途径的整合。使用矩阵分析技术对数据进行总体主题分析。很少有初级保健临床医生和患者意识到cCBT及其对退伍军人的可用性。临床医生强调了确定合适的患者使用cCBT的重要性,特别是患有轻度至中度严重抑郁症的退伍军人。临床医生认为,cCBT可以潜在地使患者参与抑郁症治疗,否则他们可能不会参与,并设想cCBT的使用由综合VHA心理健康人员指导。患者谈到了多重治疗障碍(例如,漫长的等待时间),相应地,他们认为cCBT有助于获得精神健康治疗。虽然患者提出了一些技术问题,但他们表达了对cCBT的兴趣。尽管参与者相对不了解cCBT,但cCBT被广泛认为是可接受的,并且有可能增加VHA初级保健机构对抑郁症治疗的可及性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"What do primary care clinicians and patients think about internet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for depression? A qualitative study from the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Lucinda B Leung, Sona Hovsepian, Karen E Dyer, Catherine E Brayton, Alexander S Young, Stacey Pollack, Jodie Trafton, Alison B Hamilton","doi":"10.1037/ser0000943","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000943","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression can be effectively treated with internet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT). The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provided cCBT free to all veterans nationally as of 2013; however, its uptake has been limited. This study aimed to examine VHA primary care clinicians' and patients' perspectives regarding cCBT treatment for depression. We conducted semistructured interviews with 12 primary care clinicians (September-November 2020) and four focus groups involving 15 patients with depression (March-May 2021). Interview guides were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; questions addressed depression treatment barriers and facilitators, cCBT awareness and acceptability, target patient population for cCBT, and integration into depression management pathways. Data were analyzed for overarching themes using matrix analysis techniques. Few primary care clinicians and patients were aware of cCBT and its availability for veterans. Clinicians stressed the importance of identifying appropriate patients for cCBT use, specifically veterans with mild-to-moderate severity depression. Clinicians believed cCBT could potentially engage patients in depression treatment who may not otherwise engage and envisioned cCBT use to be guided by integrated VHA mental health personnel. Patients spoke of multiple treatment barriers (e.g., long wait times) and, correspondingly, viewed cCBT as facilitating access to mental health treatment. While patients raised some technical questions, they expressed interest in cCBT. Though relatively unknown to participants, cCBT was widely perceived to be acceptable and with the potential to increase access to depression treatment within VHA primary care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"440-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143492795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.1037/ser0000957
Sara A Choate, Brian P Schaefer, Alyssa Kearney, Hannah Kay
In recent years, the emergence of alternative response models (ARMs) in the United States has shifted greater responsibility to behavioral health (BH) professionals instead of police officers when responding to BH crises. Louisville (Kentucky) Metro launched the ARM Crisis Call Diversion Program in March 2022, which provides an alternative response to certain 911 calls involving a BH crisis. Overarching goals are to deflect BH-related calls from police and reduce unnecessary institutionalizations. Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and June 2023 with 47 ARM responders (i.e., 35 first responders; 12 alternative responders). Interviews emphasized negative experiences related to program rollout, compassion fatigue, and burnout, which may impact responders' ability to fulfill their duties. Positive coping mechanisms of responders were also ascertained. First and alternative responders expressed similar sources of stressors when responding to individuals in crisis due to insufficient social support systems. All responder groups expressed a range of symptoms of compassion fatigue and burnout, but alternative responders demonstrated more awareness of the signs and a greater range of positive coping methods to address symptoms. As BH ARMs evolve, decision making related to planning, implementation, and expansion must consider responder burnout and compassion fatigue. Understanding responder burnout and compassion fatigue increases responder buy-in and can be used to improve implementation and decrease turnover. Ignoring these needs may lead to persistent barriers to implementation and negatively impact the quality of BH care individuals in crisis receive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
近年来,美国出现了替代反应模型(ARMs),在应对行为健康危机时,将更大的责任转移给了行为健康专业人员,而不是警察。路易斯维尔(肯塔基州)地铁公司于2022年3月启动了ARM危机呼叫转移计划,该计划为涉及BH危机的某些911呼叫提供替代响应。总体目标是转移警方与bh相关的电话,减少不必要的机构。利用实施研究统一框架,在2022年12月至2023年6月期间对47名ARM响应者(即35名第一响应者;12个备选应答者)。访谈强调了与项目启动、同情疲劳和倦怠相关的负面经历,这些经历可能会影响响应者履行职责的能力。反应者的积极应对机制也被确定。第一反应者和备选反应者在应对由于社会支持系统不足而处于危机中的个人时表达了类似的压力源。所有回应者都表现出一系列同情疲劳和倦怠的症状,但其他回应者表现出对这些迹象的更多认识,并表现出更广泛的积极应对方法来解决这些症状。随着BH ARMs的发展,与计划、实施和扩展相关的决策制定必须考虑响应者倦怠和同情疲劳。了解响应者的倦怠和同情疲劳会增加响应者的支持,并可用于改进实施和减少人员流动。忽视这些需求可能会导致实施方面的持续障碍,并对危机中的BH个人接受的护理质量产生负面影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Exploring perceptions of burnout, compassion fatigue, and coping: An implementation science approach to responder stress.","authors":"Sara A Choate, Brian P Schaefer, Alyssa Kearney, Hannah Kay","doi":"10.1037/ser0000957","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the emergence of alternative response models (ARMs) in the United States has shifted greater responsibility to behavioral health (BH) professionals instead of police officers when responding to BH crises. Louisville (Kentucky) Metro launched the ARM Crisis Call Diversion Program in March 2022, which provides an alternative response to certain 911 calls involving a BH crisis. Overarching goals are to deflect BH-related calls from police and reduce unnecessary institutionalizations. Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and June 2023 with 47 ARM responders (i.e., 35 first responders; 12 alternative responders). Interviews emphasized negative experiences related to program rollout, compassion fatigue, and burnout, which may impact responders' ability to fulfill their duties. Positive coping mechanisms of responders were also ascertained. First and alternative responders expressed similar sources of stressors when responding to individuals in crisis due to insufficient social support systems. All responder groups expressed a range of symptoms of compassion fatigue and burnout, but alternative responders demonstrated more awareness of the signs and a greater range of positive coping methods to address symptoms. As BH ARMs evolve, decision making related to planning, implementation, and expansion must consider responder burnout and compassion fatigue. Understanding responder burnout and compassion fatigue increases responder buy-in and can be used to improve implementation and decrease turnover. Ignoring these needs may lead to persistent barriers to implementation and negatively impact the quality of BH care individuals in crisis receive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"512-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143670456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-27DOI: 10.1037/ser0000941
Nuha Alshabani, Laura Godfrey, Cara Fuchs, Richy Villa, Daisy Perez, Sarah E Valentine
Though the implementation of science frameworks has recently been expanded to understand determinants of health equity (Woodward et al., 2021), the application of these frameworks in safety net hospital settings is new. We applied the health equity implementation framework to (a) understand the determinants of implementation and equity and (b) develop an institution-wide implementation facilitation plan for three evidence-based practices (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder. We utilized researcher field notes from clinical case consultation gathered during posttraumatic stress disorder treatment implementation initiatives (cognitive processing therapy, written exposure therapy, brief skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation) at the same safety net hospital (N = 94 meetings total, from 2020 to 2023) to assess determinants of implementation and equity. We developed a qualitative codebook based on the health equity implementation framework to specify determinants and then built an implementation facilitation toolkit for multi-EBP implementation. Similar determinants were found across clinics and EBPs (e.g., provider training gaps and misperceptions about manualized treatments; inefficiencies in identification, triage, and referral pathways; patient engagement barriers related to stigma, literacy, and mistrust) with additional nuance per clinic and EBP. Institution-wide facilitation strategies were then utilized to enhance implementation and equity and focused on enhancing both access and quality of services (e.g., training and consultation, refining referral pathways) and patient engagement (e.g., culturally responsive training, consultation, and treatment delivery). Implementation science has an important role to play in enhancing health equity. Our findings illustrate how pooling determinants across clinics and treatments can help implementation scientists engage with hospital leadership and advocate for system-level implementation facilitation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然科学框架的实施最近已扩大到了解卫生公平的决定因素(Woodward等人,2021年),但这些框架在安全网医院环境中的应用是新的。我们将健康公平实施框架应用于(a)了解实施和公平的决定因素,以及(b)为三种创伤后应激障碍循证实践(ebp)制定全机构实施促进计划。我们利用同一家安全网医院(N = 94次会议,从2020年到2023年)在创伤后应激障碍治疗实施计划(认知加工疗法、书面暴露疗法、情感和人际调节的简短技能培训)期间收集的临床病例咨询的研究人员现场记录来评估实施和公平的决定因素。我们开发了一个基于卫生公平实施框架的定性代码本,以指定决定因素,然后为多个ebp的实施建立了一个实施促进工具包。在诊所和ebp之间发现了类似的决定因素(例如,提供者培训差距和对手动治疗的误解;识别、分诊和转诊途径效率低下;患者参与障碍与耻辱感、文化素养和不信任有关),每个诊所和EBP都有额外的细微差别。然后利用全机构促进战略来加强实施和公平,并侧重于提高服务的可及性和质量(例如,培训和咨询,完善转诊途径)和患者参与(例如,符合文化的培训、咨询和治疗提供)。实施科学在促进卫生公平方面可发挥重要作用。我们的研究结果说明了如何在诊所和治疗中汇集决定因素可以帮助实施科学家与医院领导接触并倡导系统级实施促进策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Assessing implementation and health equity determinants to develop a facilitation plan for varied intensity posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments in minority-serving institutions.","authors":"Nuha Alshabani, Laura Godfrey, Cara Fuchs, Richy Villa, Daisy Perez, Sarah E Valentine","doi":"10.1037/ser0000941","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though the implementation of science frameworks has recently been expanded to understand determinants of health equity (Woodward et al., 2021), the application of these frameworks in safety net hospital settings is new. We applied the health equity implementation framework to (a) understand the determinants of implementation and equity and (b) develop an institution-wide implementation facilitation plan for three evidence-based practices (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder. We utilized researcher field notes from clinical case consultation gathered during posttraumatic stress disorder treatment implementation initiatives (cognitive processing therapy, written exposure therapy, brief skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation) at the same safety net hospital (<i>N</i> = 94 meetings total, from 2020 to 2023) to assess determinants of implementation and equity. We developed a qualitative codebook based on the health equity implementation framework to specify determinants and then built an implementation facilitation toolkit for multi-EBP implementation. Similar determinants were found across clinics and EBPs (e.g., provider training gaps and misperceptions about manualized treatments; inefficiencies in identification, triage, and referral pathways; patient engagement barriers related to stigma, literacy, and mistrust) with additional nuance per clinic and EBP. Institution-wide facilitation strategies were then utilized to enhance implementation and equity and focused on enhancing both access and quality of services (e.g., training and consultation, refining referral pathways) and patient engagement (e.g., culturally responsive training, consultation, and treatment delivery). Implementation science has an important role to play in enhancing health equity. Our findings illustrate how pooling determinants across clinics and treatments can help implementation scientists engage with hospital leadership and advocate for system-level implementation facilitation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"546-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324972/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1037/ser0000888
Ayisha Miller, Lauren L Saling
Reintegration into civilian society following military separation is a challenging process. There is a dearth of research into the impact of these factors on Australian veteran reintegration. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the lived experience of Australian veterans during reintegration, through the lens of acculturative stress and identity. Ten interviews were conducted with ex-serving members of the Australian Defence Force. Post-1990 veterans of all genders, who were at least 18 years of age, from all service branches were eligible for the study. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes each with three main themes; acculturative stress (assimilation, societal issues, social isolation), and integrated identity (acceptance, integrated communities, and adapting to the civilian world). Each main theme contained two subthemes illustrating their significance. Difficulty integrating civilian and veteran identities was a key barrier to successful reintegration and negative separation experiences undermined integration of civilian and veteran identities. Acculturative stressors identified were poor understanding by family, community, and clinicians of the incompatibility between military and civilian cultures. Education is needed for clinicians, the community, and families about military culture and difficulties for veterans when reintegrating into civilian society. Support for reintegration should be tailored to the needs of veterans encompassing personally meaningful activities, use of military skills in civilian contexts, ongoing membership of the military community and engagement with other veterans. This will ultimately foster integration of veteran and civilian identities, enabling veterans to retain their veteran identity in a manner that is adaptive for the civilian context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
退伍后重新融入平民社会是一个具有挑战性的过程。有关这些因素对澳大利亚退伍军人重返社会的影响的研究还很缺乏。本现象学研究旨在从文化适应压力和身份认同的角度,探讨澳大利亚退伍军人在重返社会过程中的生活经历。研究人员对澳大利亚国防军的退役成员进行了十次访谈。年满 18 周岁的 1990 年后退伍军人,不分性别,来自所有兵种,均有资格参与研究。主题分析揭示了两个总体主题,每个主题有三个主要内容:文化适应压力(同化、社会问题、社会隔离)和综合身份(接受、综合社区和适应平民世界)。每个主题都包含两个次主题,以说明其重要性。难以融合平民身份和退伍军人身份是成功重返社会的主要障碍,而消极的离职经历破坏了平民身份和退伍军人身份的融合。文化适应压力因素包括家庭、社区和临床医生对军民文化不相容的理解不足。需要对临床医生、社区和家庭进行有关军事文化和退伍军人重新融入平民社会的困难的教育。应根据退伍军人的需求为其提供重返社会的支持,包括有个人意义的活动、在民事环境中使用军事技能、继续加入军事社区以及与其他退伍军人接触。这将最终促进退伍军人身份与平民身份的融合,使退伍军人能够以适应平民环境的方式保留其退伍军人身份。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Acculturative stress and identity challenges undermine the successful reintegration of Australian veterans.","authors":"Ayisha Miller, Lauren L Saling","doi":"10.1037/ser0000888","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reintegration into civilian society following military separation is a challenging process. There is a dearth of research into the impact of these factors on Australian veteran reintegration. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the lived experience of Australian veterans during reintegration, through the lens of acculturative stress and identity. Ten interviews were conducted with ex-serving members of the Australian Defence Force. Post-1990 veterans of all genders, who were at least 18 years of age, from all service branches were eligible for the study. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes each with three main themes; acculturative stress (assimilation, societal issues, social isolation), and integrated identity (acceptance, integrated communities, and adapting to the civilian world). Each main theme contained two subthemes illustrating their significance. Difficulty integrating civilian and veteran identities was a key barrier to successful reintegration and negative separation experiences undermined integration of civilian and veteran identities. Acculturative stressors identified were poor understanding by family, community, and clinicians of the incompatibility between military and civilian cultures. Education is needed for clinicians, the community, and families about military culture and difficulties for veterans when reintegrating into civilian society. Support for reintegration should be tailored to the needs of veterans encompassing personally meaningful activities, use of military skills in civilian contexts, ongoing membership of the military community and engagement with other veterans. This will ultimately foster integration of veteran and civilian identities, enabling veterans to retain their veteran identity in a manner that is adaptive for the civilian context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"596-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142018392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1037/ser0000924
Adam D Bramoweth, Caroline E Hough, Erin M O'Brien, Elizabeth A Klingaman, Cara J Deininger, Christi S Ulmer, Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Jennifer L McCoy, Ada O Youk
Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among veterans and can significantly impact health, function, and quality of life. Brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI), an adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), was developed to help increase access to care outside of specialty settings. However, training providers alone is rarely sufficient, and implementation strategies are needed for successful uptake, adoption, and sustainable delivery of care. The current analysis compares the impact of providing BBTI training alone (BBTI) versus training plus implementation strategies (BBTI + IS) on veteran engagement in BBTI (i.e., reach) in Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics. Providers from four Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers completed BBTI training and then were given access to and support for implementation strategies. Core strategies implemented across all sites included developing an implementation blueprint, organizing implementation and educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, developing tools for quality monitoring, and facilitation. Veteran engagement in BBTI, CBT-I, insomnia diagnoses, and prescription sleep medication was measured using retrospective data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear models. Overall, sites significantly increased veteran engagement in BBTI (reach) from training alone and achieved further engagement with implementation strategies. At the site level, there was variability by phase, with three sites increasing BBTI only with training and one site increasing BBTI with training plus implementation support. These results are promising-increasing access to evidence-based behavioral insomnia care can be accomplished via BBTI training and easily implementable strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
慢性失眠是退伍军人中最常见的健康问题之一,会严重影响健康、功能和生活质量。失眠短期行为治疗(BBTI)是失眠认知行为治疗(CBT-I)的一种改编,旨在帮助增加专业环境外的护理机会。然而,仅靠培训提供者是不够的,需要实施战略来成功地吸收、采用和可持续地提供护理。目前的分析比较了单独提供BBTI培训(BBTI)与培训加实施策略(BBTI + IS)对初级保健心理健康综合诊所退伍军人参与BBTI(即覆盖范围)的影响。来自四个退伍军人事务医疗中心的提供者完成了BBTI培训,然后获得了执行战略的机会和支持。在所有站点实施的核心战略包括制定实施蓝图、组织实施和教育会议、编写和分发教育材料、开发质量监测工具和促进。退伍军人在BBTI、CBT-I、失眠诊断和处方睡眠药物方面的参与使用来自VA公司数据仓库的回顾性数据进行测量。采用广义线性模型进行分析。总体而言,各网站显著提高了退伍军人对BBTI的参与度,不仅限于培训,还进一步提高了实施策略的参与度。在站点层面,不同阶段存在差异,三个站点仅通过培训增加BBTI,一个站点通过培训加实施支持增加BBTI。这些结果是有希望的——通过BBTI培训和易于实施的策略,可以增加对基于证据的行为性失眠护理的获取。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Implementing brief behavioral treatment for insomnia in Department of Veterans Affairs Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics: Reach outcomes from a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial.","authors":"Adam D Bramoweth, Caroline E Hough, Erin M O'Brien, Elizabeth A Klingaman, Cara J Deininger, Christi S Ulmer, Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Jennifer L McCoy, Ada O Youk","doi":"10.1037/ser0000924","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among veterans and can significantly impact health, function, and quality of life. Brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI), an adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), was developed to help increase access to care outside of specialty settings. However, training providers alone is rarely sufficient, and implementation strategies are needed for successful uptake, adoption, and sustainable delivery of care. The current analysis compares the impact of providing BBTI training alone (BBTI) versus training plus implementation strategies (BBTI + IS) on veteran engagement in BBTI (i.e., reach) in Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics. Providers from four Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers completed BBTI training and then were given access to and support for implementation strategies. Core strategies implemented across all sites included developing an implementation blueprint, organizing implementation and educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, developing tools for quality monitoring, and facilitation. Veteran engagement in BBTI, CBT-I, insomnia diagnoses, and prescription sleep medication was measured using retrospective data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear models. Overall, sites significantly increased veteran engagement in BBTI (reach) from training alone and achieved further engagement with implementation strategies. At the site level, there was variability by phase, with three sites increasing BBTI only with training and one site increasing BBTI with training plus implementation support. These results are promising-increasing access to evidence-based behavioral insomnia care can be accomplished via BBTI training and easily implementable strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"409-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra L Morena, Larissa M Gaias, Celine Larkin, Yan Wang, Catarina Kiefe, Edwin D Boudreaux
Many who die by suicide seek care in general health care settings within a year before death, but only recently has suicide prevention become a core responsibility in these settings. Implementing suicide prevention practices is challenging, and common barriers to adoption include clinician attitudes and self-efficacy. Identifying clinician profiles can further illuminate patterns of suicide prevention practice attitudes and self-efficacy within clinician subgroups to inform implementation strategy selection and development. This study identified distinct clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and examines their associations with suicide prevention practice delivery to patients. This study also investigated variables that help explain an individual's likelihood of belonging to latent profiles. Clinicians (N = 1,570) from one health care system completed a survey assessing attitudes, confidence in using suicide prevention practices, and current practice use. Latent profile analysis was conducted, followed by outcome and predictor analyses. Four unique profiles characterized by varying levels of attitudes and self-efficacy were identified. The profile characterized by poor attitudes toward the universal screening practice but high self-efficacy to utilize suicide prevention practices reported higher practice use with patients. Clinician characteristics (e.g., role) and contextual factors (e.g., leadership support) predicted profile membership. Results highlight meaningful variations in clinicians' suicide prevention attitudes and self-efficacy, identifying four distinct profiles. These findings highlight the need for further tailoring suicide prevention training and implementation strategy selection. Profiles characterized by neutral or low self-efficacy may benefit from implementation strategies that provide interactive assistance, while high confidence profiles may benefit from strategies targeting sustainment. Specific approaches to leverage these profiles for improved practice adoption are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
许多死于自杀的人在死前一年内到一般卫生保健机构寻求治疗,但直到最近,预防自杀才成为这些机构的核心责任。实施自杀预防措施是具有挑战性的,常见的障碍包括临床医生的态度和自我效能。确定临床医生的个人资料可以进一步阐明临床医生亚组中自杀预防实践态度和自我效能的模式,从而为实施策略的选择和发展提供信息。本研究确定了不同的临床医生对自杀预防态度和信心的概况,并检查了他们与向患者提供自杀预防实践的联系。这项研究还调查了有助于解释个人属于潜在概况的可能性的变量。来自一个医疗保健系统的临床医生(N = 1570)完成了一项调查,评估了使用自杀预防措施的态度、信心和目前的做法使用情况。进行潜在剖面分析,然后进行结果分析和预测因子分析。确定了四种独特的概况,其特征是不同程度的态度和自我效能。对普遍筛查的态度较差,但对自杀预防措施的自我效能感较高的患者报告了较高的自杀预防措施使用率。临床医生特征(例如,角色)和情境因素(例如,领导支持)预测档案成员。结果突出了临床医生自杀预防态度和自我效能感的有意义的变化,确定了四种不同的概况。这些发现强调了进一步定制自杀预防培训和实施策略选择的必要性。自我效能中性或低的档案可能受益于提供互动协助的实施策略,而高自信档案可能受益于以维持为目标的策略。讨论了利用这些概要文件来改进实践采用的具体方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and their association with reported suicide prevention practices.","authors":"Alexandra L Morena, Larissa M Gaias, Celine Larkin, Yan Wang, Catarina Kiefe, Edwin D Boudreaux","doi":"10.1037/ser0000981","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000981","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many who die by suicide seek care in general health care settings within a year before death, but only recently has suicide prevention become a core responsibility in these settings. Implementing suicide prevention practices is challenging, and common barriers to adoption include clinician attitudes and self-efficacy. Identifying clinician profiles can further illuminate patterns of suicide prevention practice attitudes and self-efficacy within clinician subgroups to inform implementation strategy selection and development. This study identified distinct clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and examines their associations with suicide prevention practice delivery to patients. This study also investigated variables that help explain an individual's likelihood of belonging to latent profiles. Clinicians (<i>N</i> = 1,570) from one health care system completed a survey assessing attitudes, confidence in using suicide prevention practices, and current practice use. Latent profile analysis was conducted, followed by outcome and predictor analyses. Four unique profiles characterized by varying levels of attitudes and self-efficacy were identified. The profile characterized by poor attitudes toward the universal screening practice but high self-efficacy to utilize suicide prevention practices reported higher practice use with patients. Clinician characteristics (e.g., role) and contextual factors (e.g., leadership support) predicted profile membership. Results highlight meaningful variations in clinicians' suicide prevention attitudes and self-efficacy, identifying four distinct profiles. These findings highlight the need for further tailoring suicide prevention training and implementation strategy selection. Profiles characterized by neutral or low self-efficacy may benefit from implementation strategies that provide interactive assistance, while high confidence profiles may benefit from strategies targeting sustainment. Specific approaches to leverage these profiles for improved practice adoption are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144732921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robyn L Shepardson, Nicola F De Paul, Kelly A Caver, David J Giard, Jennifer S Funderburk
There is a pressing need to scale up access to evidence-based mental health treatment. Offering transdiagnostic treatments that accommodate a variety of presenting concerns and comorbidities in integrated primary care settings via group format and telehealth modalities can help to efficiently increase access to care. To meet this need, we refined a brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, called managing stress and emotions (MSE), which was modified for feasibility in integrated primary care settings and telehealth delivery. MSE comprises five 60-min classes emphasizing experiential skills-based learning. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MSE while preliminarily evaluating effectiveness. We conducted an open trial with 18 patients (33% female, 89% White, Mage = 47 years) experiencing anxiety, depression, or adjustment difficulties who were recruited from Veterans Health Administration primary care. Using mixed methods, we assessed mental health symptoms and functioning from pre- to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up as well as treatment feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. MSE was feasible (89% engaged), and patients reported high treatment satisfaction. Pre- to posttreatment changes were promising, with medium-to-large effect sizes, and treatment gains generally remained stable at 3-months. Mixed methods data showed increased awareness of emotions and more use of adaptive coping strategies after MSE. Findings suggest further research evaluating effectiveness and implementation is warranted, as this is the briefest version of group Unified Protocol that has been tested thus far and can help to efficiently increase access to mental health treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
迫切需要扩大获得循证精神卫生治疗的机会。在综合初级保健机构中,通过小组形式和远程保健方式提供适应各种表现问题和合并症的跨诊断治疗,有助于有效地增加获得护理的机会。为了满足这一需求,我们对情绪障碍的跨诊断治疗统一协议进行了简短的小组调整,称为管理压力和情绪(MSE),并对其进行了修改,以适应综合初级保健环境和远程医疗服务的可行性。MSE包括五个60分钟的课程,强调以体验技能为基础的学习。本试点研究评估了MSE的可行性和可接受性,并初步评估了有效性。我们对从退伍军人健康管理局初级保健中心招募的18名患有焦虑、抑郁或适应困难的患者(33%女性,89%白人,47岁)进行了一项公开试验。采用混合方法,从治疗前后和3个月的随访中评估心理健康症状和功能,以及治疗的可行性、可接受性和满意度。MSE是可行的(89%参与),患者报告了很高的治疗满意度。治疗前到治疗后的变化是有希望的,具有中到大的效应量,治疗收益通常在3个月时保持稳定。混合方法数据显示,MSE后情绪意识增强,更多地使用适应性应对策略。研究结果表明,评估有效性和实施的进一步研究是有必要的,因为这是迄今为止测试过的最简短的群体统一协议版本,可以帮助有效地增加获得精神卫生治疗的机会。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for integrated primary care: Open trial of a transdiagnostic intervention delivered via telehealth.","authors":"Robyn L Shepardson, Nicola F De Paul, Kelly A Caver, David J Giard, Jennifer S Funderburk","doi":"10.1037/ser0000983","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a pressing need to scale up access to evidence-based mental health treatment. Offering transdiagnostic treatments that accommodate a variety of presenting concerns and comorbidities in integrated primary care settings via group format and telehealth modalities can help to efficiently increase access to care. To meet this need, we refined a brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, called managing stress and emotions (MSE), which was modified for feasibility in integrated primary care settings and telehealth delivery. MSE comprises five 60-min classes emphasizing experiential skills-based learning. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MSE while preliminarily evaluating effectiveness. We conducted an open trial with 18 patients (33% female, 89% White, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47 years) experiencing anxiety, depression, or adjustment difficulties who were recruited from Veterans Health Administration primary care. Using mixed methods, we assessed mental health symptoms and functioning from pre- to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up as well as treatment feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. MSE was feasible (89% engaged), and patients reported high treatment satisfaction. Pre- to posttreatment changes were promising, with medium-to-large effect sizes, and treatment gains generally remained stable at 3-months. Mixed methods data showed increased awareness of emotions and more use of adaptive coping strategies after MSE. Findings suggest further research evaluating effectiveness and implementation is warranted, as this is the briefest version of group Unified Protocol that has been tested thus far and can help to efficiently increase access to mental health treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320930/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caitlin Rancher, Owen Winters, Emily Tilstra-Ferell, Austen McGuire, Megan M Wallace, Alyssa A Rheingold, Daniel W Smith
Exposure to trauma is a pervasive stressor that globally impacts millions of children and adults and can lead to severe adjustment problems. Although receiving evidence-based trauma-focused mental health treatment can effectively reduce distress associated with exposure to trauma, over half of those who schedule an intake session fail to attend, known as preintake attrition. Understanding factors that predict preintake attrition is essential for improving clinical care and triaging the allocation of clinic resources. This study examined clinic archival data sourced from an outpatient training clinic that focuses on delivering evidence-based trauma treatment. Data included records from 249 clients (n = 96 children; n = 153 adults) who completed a phone screen at the clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. Of the 249 total clients placed on the clinic waitlist, 52% (n = 129) attended their intake appointment. Results indicated that certain factors assessed during the initial phone screen (demographic characteristics, index trauma, and referral source) predicted preintake attrition. Notably, waitlist duration also emerged as a predictor of attrition; children who did not attend their intake spent nearly twice as many days on the waitlist compared with children who attended their intake. These findings provide insight into predictors of preintake attrition and suggest potential targets for developing strategies to increase engagement in trauma-focused treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Preintake attrition among children and adults waiting for trauma-focused treatment.","authors":"Caitlin Rancher, Owen Winters, Emily Tilstra-Ferell, Austen McGuire, Megan M Wallace, Alyssa A Rheingold, Daniel W Smith","doi":"10.1037/ser0000973","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to trauma is a pervasive stressor that globally impacts millions of children and adults and can lead to severe adjustment problems. Although receiving evidence-based trauma-focused mental health treatment can effectively reduce distress associated with exposure to trauma, over half of those who schedule an intake session fail to attend, known as preintake attrition. Understanding factors that predict preintake attrition is essential for improving clinical care and triaging the allocation of clinic resources. This study examined clinic archival data sourced from an outpatient training clinic that focuses on delivering evidence-based trauma treatment. Data included records from 249 clients (<i>n</i> = 96 children; <i>n</i> = 153 adults) who completed a phone screen at the clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. Of the 249 total clients placed on the clinic waitlist, 52% (<i>n</i> = 129) attended their intake appointment. Results indicated that certain factors assessed during the initial phone screen (demographic characteristics, index trauma, and referral source) predicted preintake attrition. Notably, waitlist duration also emerged as a predictor of attrition; children who did not attend their intake spent nearly twice as many days on the waitlist compared with children who attended their intake. These findings provide insight into predictors of preintake attrition and suggest potential targets for developing strategies to increase engagement in trauma-focused treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12252188/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144609212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel M Ranney, Haein Jun, Danielle Cottonham, Asale Hubbard, Joy Huggins, Natalie Purcell, Kristine Burkman, Shira Maguen
Previous research has found that Black veterans (vs. White veterans) evidence less symptom improvement following trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Black veterans' experiences of racism and discrimination, as well as how providers respond to these experiences during PTSD EBPs, may help to explain these racial disparities in outcomes. However, there is a lack of qualitative research exploring providers' experiences delivering PTSD EBPs to Black veterans. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature by interviewing 15 mental health providers with experience delivering PTSD EBPs working at a West Coast Veterans Affairs Medical Center about (a) their comfort in discussing racism and discrimination with veterans, (b) the role of their identity in these discussions, (c) the extent to which racism and discrimination are presenting problems in PTSD EBPs, (d) Black veterans' response to PTSD EBPs, and (e) ways PTSD EBPs may be improved for Black veterans. Rapid analysis procedures were used to identify prominent and relevant themes, which are summarized and discussed with a focus on informing clinical recommendations and the development of provider training that may improve experiences and outcomes for Black veterans engaging in PTSD EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究发现,黑人退伍军人(与白人退伍军人相比)在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的创伤为重点的循证心理治疗(EBP)后,症状改善较少。黑人退伍军人的种族主义和歧视的经历,以及在创伤后应激障碍ebp期间提供者如何应对这些经历,可能有助于解释这些结果的种族差异。然而,缺乏定性研究来探索提供者为黑人退伍军人提供创伤后应激障碍ebp的经验。本研究旨在通过访谈15位在西海岸退伍军人事务医疗中心提供创伤后应激障碍ebp的心理健康提供者来填补这一文献空白,内容涉及(a)他们在与退伍军人讨论种族主义和歧视时的舒适度,(b)他们在这些讨论中的身份角色,(c)种族主义和歧视在创伤后应激障碍ebp中呈现问题的程度,(d)黑人退伍军人对创伤后应激障碍ebp的反应。(e)改善黑人退伍军人PTSD ebp的方法。采用快速分析程序来识别突出和相关的主题,总结和讨论这些主题,重点介绍临床建议和提供者培训的发展,这些培训可能会改善黑人退伍军人从事创伤后应激障碍ebp的经验和结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Experiences of providers delivering evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD to Black veterans: A qualitative study.","authors":"Rachel M Ranney, Haein Jun, Danielle Cottonham, Asale Hubbard, Joy Huggins, Natalie Purcell, Kristine Burkman, Shira Maguen","doi":"10.1037/ser0000982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has found that Black veterans (vs. White veterans) evidence less symptom improvement following trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Black veterans' experiences of racism and discrimination, as well as how providers respond to these experiences during PTSD EBPs, may help to explain these racial disparities in outcomes. However, there is a lack of qualitative research exploring providers' experiences delivering PTSD EBPs to Black veterans. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature by interviewing 15 mental health providers with experience delivering PTSD EBPs working at a West Coast Veterans Affairs Medical Center about (a) their comfort in discussing racism and discrimination with veterans, (b) the role of their identity in these discussions, (c) the extent to which racism and discrimination are presenting problems in PTSD EBPs, (d) Black veterans' response to PTSD EBPs, and (e) ways PTSD EBPs may be improved for Black veterans. Rapid analysis procedures were used to identify prominent and relevant themes, which are summarized and discussed with a focus on informing clinical recommendations and the development of provider training that may improve experiences and outcomes for Black veterans engaging in PTSD EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144609211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel L Dyer, Katherine M Zimmerman, Xinxuyang Zhao, Qiang Xie, Cortland J Dahl, Andrew Quanbeck, Simon B Goldberg
In recent decades, depression and anxiety have worsened among American adults. Meditation apps may provide an accessible route for reducing these symptoms. However, many users experience barriers to persisting in their use of these apps. Prior research has identified psychosocial and practical barriers and facilitators to the use of meditation apps, as well as barriers and facilitators related to the apps themselves. Yet few prior studies have drawn on frameworks from the highly relevant field of implementation science, such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A lack of unifying implementation science frameworks has limited shared language to describe barriers and facilitators and has made it challenging to identify and account for multilevel factors impacting the implementation of meditation apps. As such, this study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore the implementation of the Healthy Minds Program meditation app among users experiencing elevated depressive and/or anxiety symptoms. Participants (n = 20) were drawn from a meditation dosage clinical trial and interviewed about their experiences establishing a meditation practice using the Healthy Minds Program app. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and deductive qualitative content analysis, four categories were generated: practical facilitators to developing a meditation practice, motivations for developing and maintaining a meditation practice, barriers to developing a meditation practice, and recommendations for improving the app. Overall, participants reported positive outcomes from their practice, which, for some, motivated their continued use of the Healthy Minds Program app. Future research should consider how barriers and facilitators may change over time with increased engagement and experience with meditation apps and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
近几十年来,美国成年人的抑郁和焦虑加剧。冥想应用程序可能为减轻这些症状提供了一条可行的途径。然而,许多用户在坚持使用这些应用程序时遇到了障碍。先前的研究已经确定了使用冥想应用程序的心理和实际障碍和促进因素,以及与应用程序本身相关的障碍和促进因素。然而,很少有先前的研究借鉴了实施科学高度相关领域的框架,例如《实施研究综合框架》。缺乏统一的实施科学框架限制了描述障碍和促进因素的共享语言,并使识别和解释影响冥想应用实施的多层次因素变得具有挑战性。因此,本研究使用实施研究的统一框架来探索在经历抑郁和/或焦虑症状加剧的用户中实施健康心灵计划冥想应用程序。参与者(n = 20)从冥想剂量临床试验中抽取,并采访了他们使用健康心灵计划应用程序建立冥想练习的经验。使用实施研究统一框架和推导定性内容分析,产生了四个类别:发展冥想练习的实际促进者,发展和保持冥想练习的动机,发展冥想练习的障碍,以及改进应用程序的建议。总体而言,参与者报告了他们的练习取得的积极成果,对一些人来说,未来的研究应该考虑,随着时间的推移,冥想应用程序和练习的参与度和经验的增加,障碍和促进因素可能会发生怎样的变化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Developing meditation practice in individuals with elevated psychological distress via a meditation app intervention: An implementation science-informed qualitative investigation of barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Rachel L Dyer, Katherine M Zimmerman, Xinxuyang Zhao, Qiang Xie, Cortland J Dahl, Andrew Quanbeck, Simon B Goldberg","doi":"10.1037/ser0000980","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, depression and anxiety have worsened among American adults. Meditation apps may provide an accessible route for reducing these symptoms. However, many users experience barriers to persisting in their use of these apps. Prior research has identified psychosocial and practical barriers and facilitators to the use of meditation apps, as well as barriers and facilitators related to the apps themselves. Yet few prior studies have drawn on frameworks from the highly relevant field of implementation science, such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A lack of unifying implementation science frameworks has limited shared language to describe barriers and facilitators and has made it challenging to identify and account for multilevel factors impacting the implementation of meditation apps. As such, this study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore the implementation of the Healthy Minds Program meditation app among users experiencing elevated depressive and/or anxiety symptoms. Participants (<i>n</i> = 20) were drawn from a meditation dosage clinical trial and interviewed about their experiences establishing a meditation practice using the Healthy Minds Program app. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and deductive qualitative content analysis, four categories were generated: practical facilitators to developing a meditation practice, motivations for developing and maintaining a meditation practice, barriers to developing a meditation practice, and recommendations for improving the app. Overall, participants reported positive outcomes from their practice, which, for some, motivated their continued use of the Healthy Minds Program app. Future research should consider how barriers and facilitators may change over time with increased engagement and experience with meditation apps and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12252178/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144609210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}