Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-07-06DOI: 10.1037/ser0000787
Jack Tsai, Amanda McCleery, Jonathan K Wynn, Michael F Green
The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted the physical health of some vulnerable groups, but further study is needed to investigate the pandemic's impact on financial health and mental well-being. We analyzed data from 158 participants, consisting of 59 veterans with a psychotic disorder (PSY), 49 recently housed veterans (RHV), and a control group of 50 veterans (CTL) who were assessed five times from May 2020-July 2021. This study compared the financial health of these three groups and examined the relation between financial health and psychiatric symptoms. Although the CTL group reported significantly higher income and savings than the PSY and RHV groups, the CTL group reported greater negative financial shocks than the PSY group. The RHV group reported greater material hardship but greater propensity to plan for finances and less financial shocks than the PSY group. Across all three groups, there was a reduction in financial shocks over time and no group showed more change than another. Across time, material hardship, financial shocks, and propensity to plan for finances were each significantly associated with symptoms of major depression. Together, these findings suggest the COVID-19 pandemic did not greatly impact the financial health of PSY and RHV groups possibly because of their limited income and resilience to adversity. Financial health was related to mental health supporting the U.S. government's strategic plan to include financial empowerment services in efforts to improve mental health and reduce veteran suicide. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Financial health and psychiatric symptoms among veterans with psychosis or recent homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Jack Tsai, Amanda McCleery, Jonathan K Wynn, Michael F Green","doi":"10.1037/ser0000787","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000787","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted the physical health of some vulnerable groups, but further study is needed to investigate the pandemic's impact on financial health and mental well-being. We analyzed data from 158 participants, consisting of 59 veterans with a psychotic disorder (PSY), 49 recently housed veterans (RHV), and a control group of 50 veterans (CTL) who were assessed five times from May 2020-July 2021. This study compared the financial health of these three groups and examined the relation between financial health and psychiatric symptoms. Although the CTL group reported significantly higher income and savings than the PSY and RHV groups, the CTL group reported greater negative financial shocks than the PSY group. The RHV group reported greater material hardship but greater propensity to plan for finances and less financial shocks than the PSY group. Across all three groups, there was a reduction in financial shocks over time and no group showed more change than another. Across time, material hardship, financial shocks, and propensity to plan for finances were each significantly associated with symptoms of major depression. Together, these findings suggest the COVID-19 pandemic did not greatly impact the financial health of PSY and RHV groups possibly because of their limited income and resilience to adversity. Financial health was related to mental health supporting the U.S. government's strategic plan to include financial empowerment services in efforts to improve mental health and reduce veteran suicide. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"362-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9759492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-10-12DOI: 10.1037/ser0000807
Gage M Chu, Erin Almklov, Clarice Wang, Caitlin L McLean, James O E Pittman, Ariel J Lang
Racial, ethnic, and gender health care disparities in the United States are well-documented and stretch across the lifespan. Even in large integrated health care systems such as Veteran Health Administration, which are designed to provide equality in care, social and economic disparities persist, and limit patients' achievement of health goals across multiple domains. We explore Veterans' Whole Health priorities among Veteran demographic groups. Participants who were enrolling in Veteran Health Administration provided demographics and Whole Health priorities using eScreening, a web-based self-assessment tool. Veterans had similar health care goals regardless of demographic characteristics but differences were noted in current health appraisals. Non-White and women Veterans reported worse health-relevant functioning. Black Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating for their personal development/relationships. Multiracial Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating of their surroundings. Asian Veterans were less likely to provide a high rating of their surroundings. Women Veterans reported lower appraisals for body and personal development but higher appraisals of professional care. Results indicated that demographic factors such as race and gender, and to a lesser extent ethnicity, were associated with health disparities. The Whole Health model provides a holistic framework for addressing these disparities. These findings may inform more culturally sensitive care and enhance Veteran Health Administration equal access initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Relationships among race, ethnicity, and gender and whole health among U.S. veterans.","authors":"Gage M Chu, Erin Almklov, Clarice Wang, Caitlin L McLean, James O E Pittman, Ariel J Lang","doi":"10.1037/ser0000807","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial, ethnic, and gender health care disparities in the United States are well-documented and stretch across the lifespan. Even in large integrated health care systems such as Veteran Health Administration, which are designed to provide equality in care, social and economic disparities persist, and limit patients' achievement of health goals across multiple domains. We explore Veterans' Whole Health priorities among Veteran demographic groups. Participants who were enrolling in Veteran Health Administration provided demographics and Whole Health priorities using eScreening, a web-based self-assessment tool. Veterans had similar health care goals regardless of demographic characteristics but differences were noted in current health appraisals. Non-White and women Veterans reported worse health-relevant functioning. Black Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating for their personal development/relationships. Multiracial Veterans were more likely to endorse a low rating of their surroundings. Asian Veterans were less likely to provide a high rating of their surroundings. Women Veterans reported lower appraisals for body and personal development but higher appraisals of professional care. Results indicated that demographic factors such as race and gender, and to a lesser extent ethnicity, were associated with health disparities. The Whole Health model provides a holistic framework for addressing these disparities. These findings may inform more culturally sensitive care and enhance Veteran Health Administration equal access initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"294-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11009376/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41210628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-04-06DOI: 10.1037/ser0000765
Laura López-Aybar, Lauren Gonzales, Anxhela Kanani
Lived experiences of mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric diagnoses are common throughout the world. Research demonstrates that clinical psychologists are not exempt from having lived experiences of mental illness, nor experiencing, witnessing and perpetuating stigma. However, no research has examined prosumers' (providers and consumers of mental health services) experiences of witnessing discrimination within the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of this study was to explore prosumer's experiences of stigma within clinical psychology. A total of 175 doctoral level prosumers (graduated N = 39 and N = 136 in-training) completed a mixed-method online survey regarding their stigma experiences within the field. Emergent qualitative themes from grounded theory analyses included: witnessed discrimination (invalidation, over pathologizing, clinical psychologists as experts and training as a breeding ground for stigma, psychological distress, negative feelings related to field), anticipated stigma (agency and identity rejected, degree of acceptance), internalized stigma (perceived competence and social desirability), and stigma resistance (academia in action, engaging communities, comes with a risk, worthwhile). Our findings have implications for the role of clinical psychology in perpetuating stigmatizing views and attitudes toward individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, specifically in-training and academic settings. Further research should strive to evaluate how clinical psychologists, including prosumers, engage in stigma, and the associations between discrimination and other stigma dimensions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
心理疾病的亲身经历和对精神病诊断的轻蔑态度在全世界都很普遍。研究表明,临床心理学家也不例外,他们也有精神疾病的生活经历,也经历、目睹并延续着污名化。然而,在临床心理学领域,还没有研究考察过消费者(心理健康服务的提供者和消费者)目睹歧视的经历。本研究的目的是探究临床心理学领域的消费者的成见经历。共有 175 名博士水平的临床心理学从业者(已毕业人数=39,在读人数=136)完成了一项混合方法在线调查,内容涉及他们在临床心理学领域的污名化经历。基础理论分析得出的新定性主题包括:目睹的歧视(无效、过度病理化、临床心理学家作为专家和培训是成见的温床、心理困扰、与该领域相关的负面情绪)、预期的成见(机构和身份被拒绝、接受程度)、内化的成见(感知能力和社会期望值)以及成见抵制(学术界在行动、参与社区、有风险、有价值)。我们的研究结果对临床心理学在延续对有精神疾病生活经历的人的污名化观点和态度方面所扮演的角色有一定的影响,特别是在培训和学术环境中。进一步的研究应致力于评估临床心理学家(包括专业心理学家)如何参与污名化,以及歧视与其他污名化维度之间的关联。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Prosumers' experiences of stigma dimensions within the clinical psychology field.","authors":"Laura López-Aybar, Lauren Gonzales, Anxhela Kanani","doi":"10.1037/ser0000765","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lived experiences of mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric diagnoses are common throughout the world. Research demonstrates that clinical psychologists are not exempt from having lived experiences of mental illness, nor experiencing, witnessing and perpetuating stigma. However, no research has examined prosumers' (providers and consumers of mental health services) experiences of witnessing discrimination within the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of this study was to explore prosumer's experiences of stigma within clinical psychology. A total of 175 doctoral level prosumers (graduated <i>N</i> = 39 and <i>N</i> = 136 in-training) completed a mixed-method online survey regarding their stigma experiences within the field. Emergent qualitative themes from grounded theory analyses included: witnessed discrimination (invalidation, over pathologizing, clinical psychologists as experts and training as a breeding ground for stigma, psychological distress, negative feelings related to field), anticipated stigma (agency and identity rejected, degree of acceptance), internalized stigma (perceived competence and social desirability), and stigma resistance (academia in action, engaging communities, comes with a risk, worthwhile). Our findings have implications for the role of clinical psychology in perpetuating stigmatizing views and attitudes toward individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, specifically in-training and academic settings. Further research should strive to evaluate how clinical psychologists, including prosumers, engage in stigma, and the associations between discrimination and other stigma dimensions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9263705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-06-29DOI: 10.1037/ser0000781
Ellen F Finch, Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Emily E Bernstein
Brief, transdiagnostic interventions are an efficient form of mental health care for resource-limited settings like universities. Little research, however, has examined for whom these treatments are most effective. One important factor may be psychotherapy treatment history. Here, we evaluate if treatment history influences the effects of a single-session cognitive behavioral group intervention with optional digital follow-up support across two independent, university-based studies. Undergraduate (N = 143) and graduate (N = 51) students reported their psychotherapy treatment history and completed self-report measures of emotional health before and approximately 1-month following the intervention. Across both samples, psychotherapy treatment history did not moderate changes in depression, anxiety, or emotional avoidance following the intervention. However, participants who were currently receiving psychotherapy began the workshop with lower coping self-efficacy than peers with no prior psychotherapy and saw larger gains in coping self-efficacy at follow-up. Results suggest that regardless of whether a student has previously received psychotherapy, they may benefit from brief, group transdiagnostic interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Helpful for all? Examining the effects of psychotherapy treatment history on outcomes of single session, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral interventions for university students.","authors":"Ellen F Finch, Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Emily E Bernstein","doi":"10.1037/ser0000781","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brief, transdiagnostic interventions are an efficient form of mental health care for resource-limited settings like universities. Little research, however, has examined for whom these treatments are most effective. One important factor may be psychotherapy treatment history. Here, we evaluate if treatment history influences the effects of a single-session cognitive behavioral group intervention with optional digital follow-up support across two independent, university-based studies. Undergraduate (<i>N</i> = 143) and graduate (<i>N</i> = 51) students reported their psychotherapy treatment history and completed self-report measures of emotional health before and approximately 1-month following the intervention. Across both samples, psychotherapy treatment history did not moderate changes in depression, anxiety, or emotional avoidance following the intervention. However, participants who were currently receiving psychotherapy began the workshop with lower coping self-efficacy than peers with no prior psychotherapy and saw larger gains in coping self-efficacy at follow-up. Results suggest that regardless of whether a student has previously received psychotherapy, they may benefit from brief, group transdiagnostic interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9701683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-06-26DOI: 10.1037/ser0000782
Courtland S Hyatt, Chelsea E Sleep, Octaviana Hemmy Asamsama, Mark A Reger
We surveyed N = 84 mental health care providers (i.e., psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers) working across two Veterans Affairs health care sites about their experiences working with Veteran patients with antagonism-based clinical presentations (e.g., callous, aggressive, grandiose features), as well as negative affect-based clinical presentations (e.g., depressive, anxious, self-conscious features). Providers reported on aspects of these clinical interactions, including assessments and interventions used, treatment outcomes, interpersonal experiences, and training and preparedness to treat this type of presentation in the future. Compared to treatment experiences with patients with predominant negative affect, providers reported that treatment experiences with antagonistic (ANT) patients tended to be shorter (d = -.60), less effective at improving psychological functioning (d = -.61), more emotionally draining (d = 1.03), and more often marked by relationship ruptures (instance of ≥1 rupture = 72.6% vs. 15.5%). Providers also reported less professional training to treat antagonism (d = -1.56) and less preparedness to treat ANT patients in the future (d = -1.81). These results highlight the important role of patient characteristics in providers' experiences and underscore the need for more training and resources to support mental health providers working with ANT patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们调查了 N = 84 名在两个退伍军人事务医疗机构工作的心理健康医疗服务提供者(即精神科医生、心理学家、社会工作者),了解他们与具有对抗性临床表现(如冷酷无情、攻击性、好大喜功等特征)以及负性情感临床表现(如抑郁、焦虑、自我意识等特征)的退伍军人患者打交道的经历。医疗服务提供者报告了这些临床互动的各个方面,包括所使用的评估和干预措施、治疗结果、人际交往经验以及培训和为将来治疗这类表现做好准备。与消极情绪占主导地位的患者的治疗经历相比,医疗服务提供者报告说,对抗性(ANT)患者的治疗经历往往较短(d = -.60),在改善心理功能方面效果较差(d = -.61),更耗费情感(d = 1.03),而且更经常出现关系破裂(关系破裂≥1 次的比例 = 72.6% vs. 15.5%)。医疗服务提供者还报告说,他们接受的治疗对立情绪的专业培训较少(d =-1.56),将来治疗 ANT 患者的准备程度也较低(d =-1.81)。这些结果凸显了患者特征在提供者经验中的重要作用,并强调需要更多的培训和资源来支持心理健康提供者与 ANT 患者打交道。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Surveying veterans affairs mental health care providers on experiences working with veteran patients with antagonistic clinical presentations.","authors":"Courtland S Hyatt, Chelsea E Sleep, Octaviana Hemmy Asamsama, Mark A Reger","doi":"10.1037/ser0000782","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We surveyed <i>N</i> = 84 mental health care providers (i.e., psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers) working across two Veterans Affairs health care sites about their experiences working with Veteran patients with antagonism-based clinical presentations (e.g., callous, aggressive, grandiose features), as well as negative affect-based clinical presentations (e.g., depressive, anxious, self-conscious features). Providers reported on aspects of these clinical interactions, including assessments and interventions used, treatment outcomes, interpersonal experiences, and training and preparedness to treat this type of presentation in the future. Compared to treatment experiences with patients with predominant negative affect, providers reported that treatment experiences with antagonistic (ANT) patients tended to be shorter (<i>d</i> = -.60), less effective at improving psychological functioning (<i>d</i> = -.61), more emotionally draining (<i>d</i> = 1.03), and more often marked by relationship ruptures (instance of ≥1 rupture = 72.6% vs. 15.5%). Providers also reported less professional training to treat antagonism (<i>d</i> = -1.56) and less preparedness to treat ANT patients in the future (<i>d</i> = -1.81). These results highlight the important role of patient characteristics in providers' experiences and underscore the need for more training and resources to support mental health providers working with ANT patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10749978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10042785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-01-23DOI: 10.1037/ser0000738
Alexandra Hernandez-Vallant, Victoria R Votaw, Jalene L Herron, Elena R Stein, Julia E Swan, Devin M Ulrich, Meredith A Blackwell, Barbara S McCrady
A standard component of service delivery in alcohol treatment clinics is evidence-based assessment (EBA). Although EBA is essential for selecting appropriate treatment modalities for alcohol use and associated problems, there are limitations in existing EBAs concerning evidence of cultural equivalence and utility among individuals seeking alcohol treatment. However, training in EBA, addictions, and clinical applications with diverse populations all are gaps in clinical training in doctoral programs in clinical psychology. The present work used the clinical science model to review the psychometric properties, cross-cultural utility, and measurement invariance of measures in an assessment battery used in an alcohol treatment training clinic. This article describes the results of that review, recommendations for retaining or replacing common assessment measures used in alcohol treatment clinics, and recommendations for alcohol treatment clinics interested in engaging in similar processes. Findings suggested that more research is needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of EBAs utilized in an alcohol treatment assessment battery, particularly among American Indian and Alaska Native people, and to test measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and other identity groups in alcohol treatment-seeking populations. Overall, routine reviews of cultural relevance are needed in clinical settings to stay current with the emerging literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
酒精治疗诊所提供服务的一个标准组成部分是循证评估(EBA)。虽然循证评估对于选择适当的酒精使用及相关问题的治疗方式至关重要,但现有的循证评估在寻求酒精治疗的个人中的文化等同性和实用性方面存在局限性。然而,在临床心理学博士课程的临床培训中,EBA、成瘾和不同人群临床应用方面的培训都是空白。目前的工作采用临床科学模式,对酒精治疗培训诊所使用的评估组合的心理测量特性、跨文化实用性和测量不变性进行了审查。本文介绍了审查结果、保留或替换酒精治疗诊所常用评估方法的建议,以及对有意参与类似过程的酒精治疗诊所的建议。研究结果表明,需要开展更多的研究来评估酒精治疗评估组合中使用的 EBA 的心理测量特性,特别是在美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民中,并测试酒精治疗人群中不同种族/民族和其他身份群体的测量不变性。总之,临床环境中需要对文化相关性进行例行审查,以便与新兴文献保持同步。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A clinical science guide for reviewing the cross-cultural rigor of assessments in an alcohol training clinic.","authors":"Alexandra Hernandez-Vallant, Victoria R Votaw, Jalene L Herron, Elena R Stein, Julia E Swan, Devin M Ulrich, Meredith A Blackwell, Barbara S McCrady","doi":"10.1037/ser0000738","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A standard component of service delivery in alcohol treatment clinics is evidence-based assessment (EBA). Although EBA is essential for selecting appropriate treatment modalities for alcohol use and associated problems, there are limitations in existing EBAs concerning evidence of cultural equivalence and utility among individuals seeking alcohol treatment. However, training in EBA, addictions, and clinical applications with diverse populations all are gaps in clinical training in doctoral programs in clinical psychology. The present work used the clinical science model to review the psychometric properties, cross-cultural utility, and measurement invariance of measures in an assessment battery used in an alcohol treatment training clinic. This article describes the results of that review, recommendations for retaining or replacing common assessment measures used in alcohol treatment clinics, and recommendations for alcohol treatment clinics interested in engaging in similar processes. Findings suggested that more research is needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of EBAs utilized in an alcohol treatment assessment battery, particularly among American Indian and Alaska Native people, and to test measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and other identity groups in alcohol treatment-seeking populations. Overall, routine reviews of cultural relevance are needed in clinical settings to stay current with the emerging literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"305-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9862606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-07-20DOI: 10.1037/ser0000790
Shoba Sreenivasan, Allen Azizian, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Jack Tsai, Joseph Lockhart, Melinda DiCiro, James Rokop
Military veterans with sexual offenses committed after discharge are often eligible for Veterans Affairs (VA) services including health care. There are few, if any, studies of sexual recidivism among military veterans with sexual offense histories to guide clinical management. This study examined diagnostic and postrelease sexual and nonsexual recidivism among military sexual offenders released from California sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment. The sample consisted of 363 males; 131 were identified as military veterans and 232 as civilians. The rates of recidivism were assessed for two follow-up periods: a fixed 5-year and a total 21-year follow-up. Recidivism was operationalized as any new sexual, violent, or general criminal arrest or conviction occurring after discharge to the community in California. We found a low risk for sexual reoffense for both groups. Specific to veterans, the rates for sexual and nonsexual violent recidivism were under 7% for both follow-up periods. Diagnostically, veterans had a significantly higher rate of pedophilic disorder and lower rate of antisocial personality disorder than civilians; neither were predictive of sexual recidivism or any other recidivism. On average, veterans were 61 years old at discharge; and older age at discharge was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of recidivism of any type. A relatively high proportion of veterans had a history of childhood sexual abuse and head trauma. Trauma-informed care may be a particularly valuable treatment approach for veterans with sexual offenses. These data may aid the VA and other providers in forming evidence-based decisions regarding the management of veterans with sexual offenses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Pathways for VA and community stakeholder management of military veterans with sexual offenses: Sexual and nonsexual recidivism rates and risk factors in military veterans released from California sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment.","authors":"Shoba Sreenivasan, Allen Azizian, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Jack Tsai, Joseph Lockhart, Melinda DiCiro, James Rokop","doi":"10.1037/ser0000790","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Military veterans with sexual offenses committed after discharge are often eligible for Veterans Affairs (VA) services including health care. There are few, if any, studies of sexual recidivism among military veterans with sexual offense histories to guide clinical management. This study examined diagnostic and postrelease sexual and nonsexual recidivism among military sexual offenders released from California sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment. The sample consisted of 363 males; 131 were identified as military veterans and 232 as civilians. The rates of recidivism were assessed for two follow-up periods: a fixed 5-year and a total 21-year follow-up. Recidivism was operationalized as any new sexual, violent, or general criminal arrest or conviction occurring after discharge to the community in California. We found a low risk for sexual reoffense for both groups. Specific to veterans, the rates for sexual and nonsexual violent recidivism were under 7% for both follow-up periods. Diagnostically, veterans had a significantly higher rate of pedophilic disorder and lower rate of antisocial personality disorder than civilians; neither were predictive of sexual recidivism or any other recidivism. On average, veterans were 61 years old at discharge; and older age at discharge was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of recidivism of any type. A relatively high proportion of veterans had a history of childhood sexual abuse and head trauma. Trauma-informed care may be a particularly valuable treatment approach for veterans with sexual offenses. These data may aid the VA and other providers in forming evidence-based decisions regarding the management of veterans with sexual offenses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"317-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10196311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1037/ser0000777
Sadie E Larsen, Jonathan D Hessinger, Eric Larson, Stephen E Melka, Heather M Smith
Although psychologists are trained to conduct research as well as clinical work, it can be challenging for psychologists outside of traditional academia to find the time or capacity to engage in research. Providing opportunities for practicing psychologists to conduct research may enhance the generalizability of psychological research, as well as provide benefits to psychologists in terms of collaboration, promotion, and engagement. Yet, several barriers exist, including competing demands on time, lack of institutional support, and limited research confidence. This article describes "Paper in a Day" (PiaD), a novel approach to research engagement that is well-suited for busy practitioners. PiaD considers many of the aforementioned factors and provides a method to navigate the often-daunting prospect of research involvement for the practicing clinician. Through PiaD, two Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers engaged clinicians and trainees in collaborating in a time-limited way to write and publish peer-reviewed articles. The current article outlines the process by which clinicians at these two sites structured research engagement utilizing PiaD, and it was also written utilizing the PiaD model. The authors have now led or participated in the PiaD process five times, with 13 teams of clinicians producing nine peer-reviewed articles and five conference presentations. A brief survey indicated that participants felt engaged in the process and would participate again if given the opportunity. This article outlines barriers and facilitators of the PiaD process, with the hope of encouraging other settings to consider using such a method to enhance research productivity and engagement for psychologists. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"Paper in a day\": A model to encourage psychology collaboration and participation in research/program evaluation.","authors":"Sadie E Larsen, Jonathan D Hessinger, Eric Larson, Stephen E Melka, Heather M Smith","doi":"10.1037/ser0000777","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although psychologists are trained to conduct research as well as clinical work, it can be challenging for psychologists outside of traditional academia to find the time or capacity to engage in research. Providing opportunities for practicing psychologists to conduct research may enhance the generalizability of psychological research, as well as provide benefits to psychologists in terms of collaboration, promotion, and engagement. Yet, several barriers exist, including competing demands on time, lack of institutional support, and limited research confidence. This article describes \"Paper in a Day\" (PiaD), a novel approach to research engagement that is well-suited for busy practitioners. PiaD considers many of the aforementioned factors and provides a method to navigate the often-daunting prospect of research involvement for the practicing clinician. Through PiaD, two Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers engaged clinicians and trainees in collaborating in a time-limited way to write and publish peer-reviewed articles. The current article outlines the process by which clinicians at these two sites structured research engagement utilizing PiaD, and it was also written utilizing the PiaD model. The authors have now led or participated in the PiaD process five times, with 13 teams of clinicians producing nine peer-reviewed articles and five conference presentations. A brief survey indicated that participants felt engaged in the process and would participate again if given the opportunity. This article outlines barriers and facilitators of the PiaD process, with the hope of encouraging other settings to consider using such a method to enhance research productivity and engagement for psychologists. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"287-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9545775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2022-09-05DOI: 10.1037/ser0000706
Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin, Joshua Bullock, Joanna Fiszdon, Meaghan Stacy, Steve Martino, Alison V James, Courtney Wiesepape, Paul H Lysaker
Metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT) is an one-on-one intervention that targets insight with the aim to help people with serious mental illness develop more integrated ideas about themselves and others in order to respond to their psychological and social challenges more adaptively. There is a growing body of evidence on MERIT's effectiveness. Considering the clinical demand for more cost-effective group psychotherapies, we modified the original individual MERIT format to a group-based intervention (MERITg) for application in inpatient and outpatient psychiatric settings. Thirty-one participants (inpatient = 10; outpatient = 21) with serious mental illness were surveyed on their experience of MERITg, which was offered adjunctively to their routine clinical care. Program evaluation measures were used to assess the feasibility and acceptance of the group. Across locations, more than half of all participants attended more than one group. Participants reported attending the group initially because they thought writing would be helpful, and further reported that they liked the group because they enjoyed writing and the discussion, and that they found it interesting to hear the perspectives and writings of others. Findings further support the need for future research on the efficacy and effectiveness of the group and its relationship to changes in metacognitive capacity and recovery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Translating an integrative metacognitive model of psychotherapy for serious mental illness into a group format: A pilot investigation on feasibility.","authors":"Ashley M Schnakenberg Martin, Joshua Bullock, Joanna Fiszdon, Meaghan Stacy, Steve Martino, Alison V James, Courtney Wiesepape, Paul H Lysaker","doi":"10.1037/ser0000706","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT) is an one-on-one intervention that targets insight with the aim to help people with serious mental illness develop more integrated ideas about themselves and others in order to respond to their psychological and social challenges more adaptively. There is a growing body of evidence on MERIT's effectiveness. Considering the clinical demand for more cost-effective group psychotherapies, we modified the original individual MERIT format to a group-based intervention (MERITg) for application in inpatient and outpatient psychiatric settings. Thirty-one participants (inpatient = 10; outpatient = 21) with serious mental illness were surveyed on their experience of MERITg, which was offered adjunctively to their routine clinical care. Program evaluation measures were used to assess the feasibility and acceptance of the group. Across locations, more than half of all participants attended more than one group. Participants reported attending the group initially because they thought writing would be helpful, and further reported that they liked the group because they enjoyed writing and the discussion, and that they found it interesting to hear the perspectives and writings of others. Findings further support the need for future research on the efficacy and effectiveness of the group and its relationship to changes in metacognitive capacity and recovery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"130-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484016/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10528203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-06-22DOI: 10.1037/ser0000774
Cindy A McGeary, Leslie A Morland, Patricia A Resick, Casey L Straud, John C Moring, Min Ji Sohn, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Ron Acierno, Sheila A M Rauch, Jim Mintz, Donald D McGeary, Stephanie Y Wells, Kathleen Grubbs, Paul S Nabity, Chelsea J McMahon, Brett T Litz, Dawn I Velligan, Alexandra Macdonald, Emma Mata-Galan, Stephen L Holliday, Kirsten H Dillon, John D Roache, Alan L Peterson
The intent of this study is to examine treatment impact and efficiency observed when cognitive behavioral treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are delivered in-person or using telehealth. This study pooled data from 268 veterans enrolled in two PTSD clinical trials. In both trials, treatment was delivered using in-home telehealth (telehealth arm), in-home in-person (in-home arm), and in-office care, where patients traveled to the Department of Veterans Affairs for either office-based telehealth or office-based in-person care (office arm). Average age was 44 (SD = 12.57); 80.9% were males. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) was used to assess symptom severity. Treatment impact was measured by (a) the proportion of participants who completed at least eight treatment sessions and (b) the proportion with a reliable change of ≥ 10 points on the PCL-5. Treatment efficiency was measured by the number of days required to reach the end point. The proportion of participants who attended at least eight sessions and achieved reliable change on the PCL-5 differed across treatment formats (ps < .05). Participants in the in-home (75.4%) format were most likely to attend at least eight treatment sessions, followed by those in the telehealth (58.3%) and office (44.0%) formats, the latter of which required patients to travel. Participants in the in-home (68.3%, p < .001) format were also more likely to achieve reliable change, followed by those in the telehealth (50.9%) and office (44.2%) formats. There were no significant differences in the amount of time to complete at least eight sessions. Delivery of therapy in-home results in a significantly greater likelihood of achieving both an adequate dose of therapy and a reliable decrease in PTSD symptoms compared to telehealth and office formats. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Impact and efficiency of treatment across two PTSD clinical trials comparing in-person and telehealth service delivery formats.","authors":"Cindy A McGeary, Leslie A Morland, Patricia A Resick, Casey L Straud, John C Moring, Min Ji Sohn, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Ron Acierno, Sheila A M Rauch, Jim Mintz, Donald D McGeary, Stephanie Y Wells, Kathleen Grubbs, Paul S Nabity, Chelsea J McMahon, Brett T Litz, Dawn I Velligan, Alexandra Macdonald, Emma Mata-Galan, Stephen L Holliday, Kirsten H Dillon, John D Roache, Alan L Peterson","doi":"10.1037/ser0000774","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000774","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intent of this study is to examine treatment impact and efficiency observed when cognitive behavioral treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are delivered in-person or using telehealth. This study pooled data from 268 veterans enrolled in two PTSD clinical trials. In both trials, treatment was delivered using in-home telehealth (<i>telehealth</i> arm), in-home in-person (<i>in-home</i> arm), and in-office care, where patients traveled to the Department of Veterans Affairs for either office-based telehealth or office-based in-person care (<i>office</i> arm). Average age was 44 (<i>SD</i> = 12.57); 80.9% were males. The PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> (PCL-5) was used to assess symptom severity. Treatment impact was measured by (a) the proportion of participants who completed at least eight treatment sessions and (b) the proportion with a reliable change of ≥ 10 points on the PCL-5. Treatment efficiency was measured by the number of days required to reach the end point. The proportion of participants who attended at least eight sessions and achieved reliable change on the PCL-5 differed across treatment formats (<i>p</i>s < .05). Participants in the in-home (75.4%) format were most likely to attend at least eight treatment sessions, followed by those in the telehealth (58.3%) and office (44.0%) formats, the latter of which required patients to travel. Participants in the in-home (68.3%, <i>p</i> < .001) format were also more likely to achieve reliable change, followed by those in the telehealth (50.9%) and office (44.2%) formats. There were no significant differences in the amount of time to complete at least eight sessions. Delivery of therapy in-home results in a significantly greater likelihood of achieving both an adequate dose of therapy and a reliable decrease in PTSD symptoms compared to telehealth and office formats. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9730434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}