Psychological Services最新文献

Often in implementation science efforts, an intervention originated by research funding does not continue in clinical practice after funding ends, or if it does, the process by which it was sustained remains known only to the implementation research or clinical teams. From 2018 to 2020, we implemented a complex telehealth interdisciplinary behavioral health program supported by research funding. The intervention was Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) delivered via televideo from a large parent medical facility to rural satellite clinics (tele-PCMHI) within the Veterans Health Administration. Two implementation facilitators worked closely with clinical leaders and staff to plan, launch, and sustain tele-PCMHI across four sites. The intervention is still maintained by the clinical service and has spread to eight sites. Based on ethnographic and qualitative data collected weekly over 2 years, we categorized sustainment strategies across distinct time periods for this complex program, theoretically grounded in the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, emphasizing changes to adapt intervention fit to rapidly changing context. To contextualize, we identified barriers and strengths, such as difficulty training staff to use new equipment, restructuring clinic workflow, and determining suicide risk management remotely. New barriers arose, and, thus, new strategies were needed to continue implementing at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Different strategies at different stages of implementation allowed sustainment to be a dynamic and evolving process. Plus, proactive and persistent planning for sustainment early in the effort, along with alignment with performance metrics and national policy, supported continued delivery in real-world organized care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

This study examined mental health treatment nonutilization among sexual minority versus heterosexual Veterans with demonstrated psychiatric need. Data were analyzed from 820 Veterans with psychiatric need who participated in the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study, which surveyed a nationally representative sample of U.S. military Veterans. Results revealed that current mental health service nonutilization did not differ between sexual minority versus heterosexual Veterans (70.5% vs. 74.0%). Significant interactions between sexual orientation and sex assigned at birth, primary source of health care (Veteran Affairs [VA] vs. non-VA), and beliefs that peers would blame them for their mental health problems were observed in analyses predicting current mental health treatment utilization. Among Veterans primarily utilizing VA health care, sexual minority Veterans were less likely than heterosexual Veterans to engage in mental treatment; among those primarily using non-VA, this pattern was reversed. Sexual minority Veterans were significantly more likely than heterosexual Veterans to report not knowing where to get help, not having adequate transportation, and having difficulty scheduling an appointment. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that rates of mental health nonutilization are high for both sexual minority and heterosexual Veterans, and that factors that influence utilization may differ by sexual orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Across the United States, polarizing politics have contributed to the increased stigmatization of transgender (trans) and gender expansive (TGE) youth, reinforcing health inequities for this population. Although lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and/or questioning (LGBTQ+) youth centers have often served as places of refuge for young people across the gender spectrum, literature has yet to show how practices and strategies used in these settings promote TGE affirmation. This qualitative study explores youth and staff experiences within these settings; identifies the services, policies, and environments needed to support TGE community members; and ultimately calls for the expansion of the limited research on TGE experience and affirmation across such spaces. Using data collected in a larger study on affirming practices for LGBTQ+ youth, this article presents findings from in-depth, semistructured focus groups and interviews with TGE (n = 12) youth and staff (n = 12) across four LGBTQ+ community-based organizations in two large urban centers. Study findings show these organizations provide TGE affirmation through language, programming, and atmospheres of openness to identity exploration. Essential to these offerings are organizational policy mandates, such as correct pronoun usage and TGE-specific programming. Youth often juxtapose their experiences of affirmation within LGBTQ+ spaces with experiences of invalidation from the cisheteronormative cultures within their school or home environments. Implications for future practice and research include administering ongoing training on TGE-affirming language and developing comprehensive accountability measures (e.g., TGE-inclusive community guidelines). Institutions with these systems in place are well-equipped to contribute to the fight for trans liberation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Criticisms of police use of force policies and the over policing of communities of color have generated calls to reallocate part of the funding that routinely goes to police departments to fund more social welfare programs. In particular, analysts and policy makers have supported the implementation of alternative crisis response programs, such as the use of unarmed behavioral health workers, to reduce police contact and improve mental health service provision to citizens. The present study examined the extent to which one such civilian-based 911 diversion program in St. Petersburg, Florida, called the Community Assistance and Life Liaison program, provides equitable access to communities in need. Through analysis of contact data (N = 6,653 contacts with residents) and zip code-level Census data of community characteristics, we found that the program diverted 37% of the noncrime crisis calls coming through the emergency communication line. The program additionally engaged in a substantial number of proactive and follow-up contacts, responded to a diverse group of individuals, and disproportionately served communities showing higher drivers of inequity. At the same time, notable disparities were found in that fewer follow-up services and nonlive referrals (e.g., officer or proactive contacts) were provided by Community Assistance and Life Liaison program to communities with higher poverty rates, Black youth were less likely to be diverted from police contact, and communities with more Black and non-U.S. citizen residents were less likely to receive live dispatch contacts from the program. Implications and recommendations for reducing over policing and health disparities are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) training has been adopted across the United States to teach adults how to identify and respond to youth mental health challenges and crises. Evaluations of YMHFA have yet to be undertaken with law enforcement populations, although agencies and officers are participating in the training. The present study implemented and evaluated YMHFA with law enforcement officers (N = 446) across a southeastern state. A longitudinal survey design (pretest, posttest, 90-day follow-up) was employed to measure training participants' satisfaction with the training and changes to seven constructs: mental health knowledge; confidence to engage in help-seeking behaviors; intentions to intervene; positive attitudes toward youth with mental health needs; negative attitudes toward community responsibility for youth with mental health needs; positive attitudes toward youth with mental health needs living in the community; and preparedness. Results of analyses demonstrated statistically significant improvements among all constructs immediately following training completion, and participants generally reported being satisfied with the training. However, most of the improvements observed immediately following the training disappeared at the 90-day follow-up, with only participants' reported confidence and preparedness continuing to show improvement over pretest scores. The implications of these findings for law enforcement officers, their agencies, and researchers are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) are typically delivered face-to-face or remotely via telehealth. In recent years, there has been a rapid rise in the number of SUD services delivered using telehealth. However, the literature on which mode of service delivery SUD patients and providers prefer is still emerging, particularly with respect to family-based interventions in Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs). This study sought to identify/explain preferences for delivering family-based programs among OTP patients and providers. Data collection from a total of 40 participants (20 patients and 20 providers) was conducted from August 2022 to October 2022 at two OTPs in Florida. An online survey was used to collect demographic data, while individual qualitative interviews were conducted to explore preferences for delivering family-based programs. Audiotapes of interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. Analyses revealed that patients and providers had similar preferences, with the most salient being (a) concerns about keeping children engaged during telehealth sessions, (b) concerns about communication barriers when using telehealth, (c) preference for telehealth using live video (as opposed to prerecorded content), and (d) preference for telehealth over face-to-face due to greater convenience for patients. These findings show that preferences for delivering family-based services are varied and may differ somewhat from preferences for delivering traditional individual therapy services. The data presented here can be used to develop and further refine protocols for adapting and delivering family-based interventions in OTP settings, and are especially timely as legislative discussions are currently occurring about expanding telehealth services in these facilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

FLOW (not an acronym) is a program that aims to improve mental health (MH) access using an algorithm that extracts electronic medical record data to identify recovered or stabilized MH patients who may be eligible to transition to primary care. The purpose of this case study was to describe and understand the factors that contributed to success or struggles in implementing FLOW. We conducted a posthoc evaluation of four health care sites implementing FLOW, using a mixed-method formal case study analysis. Qualitative data included written process notes, teleconference minutes, and interviews with internal facilitators (IF), MH providers, and patients who were transitioned. The external facilitation team also examined the degree to which IF characteristics matched suggested criteria. Quantitative data included discharge percentages and the percentage of providers who transitioned ≥ three patients during implementation. Sites were considered successful if they: (a) discharged ≥ 3% of their unique MH patients and (b) had a preponderance of patients who were satisfied with their MH to primary care transition. This article discusses two successful and two struggling FLOW sites based on these and other criteria and the factors that contributed to these outcomes. These case study findings increased understanding of how to successfully implement FLOW. The importance of shared decision making, selection of the IF, role definition, as well as leadership and organizational support are key elements in fostering appropriate transitions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

African American veterans who use tobacco use evidence-based tobacco-cessation treatment less than other racial/ethnic groups, contributing to higher tobacco-related treatment burden for them. This study aimed to assess barriers and facilitators African American patients face before engaging in Veterans Health Administration behavioral tobacco-cessation treatment services, as an initial step to identify new implementation strategies. African American veterans (N = 30) who use tobacco at a large Veterans Affairs Medical Center completed interviews about perceived barriers and facilitators to behavioral treatment, views on telehealth, and suggested care improvements. We used a combination of deductive and inductive analytic approaches and identified four themes: (1) Ambivalence towards Quitting Tobacco: Patients described how low motivation to quit and intense withdrawal symptoms impede treatment engagement, despite known health risks; (2) Limited Interaction with Health Care System: Patients described how histories of mistrust and stigma toward treatment impact engagement with the health care system, resulting in lack of awareness of treatment options and preference for self-reliance in quitting; (3) Individualized Factors for Engagement: Patients described how persistent providers, access to telehealth modalities, personal health complications exacerbated by tobacco use, and benefits of positive lifestyle change increase motivation for treatment; and (4) Suggestions for Culturally Tailored Treatment Engagement: Patients expressed a desire for more African American group-specific outreach, including targeted advertisement and culturally aware providers to combat mistrust of the health care system. Findings indicate that generating patient-driven implementation strategies such as tailored education and proactive outreach are necessary to increase engagement of African American patients in tobacco-cessation treatment programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Measurement-based care (MBC) comprises collecting patient-reported outcomes data using validated assessments and using that information to support treatment. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed technology platforms to support MBC, including the Mental Health Checkup (MHC) mobile health application (app). Our objective was to examine VHA mental health provider perspectives on the MHC app. We completed a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory evaluation of MHC. We surveyed 284 VHA mental health providers who used MHC, then conducted semistructured telephone interviews with a purposefully selected subset of survey respondents (n = 20). Approximately half of survey respondents agreed that MHC allowed them to collect assessment data from veterans more frequently than before (51%) and that they more frequently discussed assessment results with veterans because of MHC (50%) and used those results to inform goal-setting discussions (50%) and treatment decision making (51%). Bivariate analyses indicated a positive relationship between frequency of MHC use and the aforementioned impacts on care. Interview data conveyed both advantages (e.g., increased treatment efficiency, improved treatment decision making) and challenges (e.g., limited assessment availability, difficulties engaging veterans in completing assessments through the app) to using MHC. This evaluation demonstrated how MHC supported providers working to implement MBC. The app enhanced their ability to reach and engage veterans and incorporate assessment data into clinical encounters. Still, many did not perceive that MHC was impactful on mental health care delivery; given that providers who used MHC more frequently reported more positive impressions of MHC, this may be related to how frequently they used the app. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Within mental health services, persons in recovery from their own experiences of mental health challenges (peers) are increasingly being trained to provide peer support. This study describes individual and organizational outcomes related to engaging peers in a multisite demonstration project in California that sought to integrate them as cocreators throughout planning and implementation of digital mental health interventions. We collected data from key informants across 11 sites. Quarterly online surveys invited key informants to report perceived outcomes of the peer component. Biannual interviews elicited details regarding survey-reported outcomes. Quantitative data provided indications of outcome prevalence and consistency, and quotes from the interviews illustrated the complex realities underlying survey responses. One hundred three quarterly surveys and 39 biannual interviews were completed between Summer 2020 and Fall 2022. Key informants reported diverse outcomes, including integration of peer input into local decision making, mental health benefits to peers and community members, reduced workplace mental health stigma, and new cross-site collaborations. Five sites reported outcomes with greater consistency compared to the other six sites. Reports of increased peer visibility in the workplace coincided with reports of reduced stigma and increased value of peer input by mental health professionals. This study offers encouragement for the potential positive impact of engaging peers as cocreators of mental health interventions. Data suggest integrating peers does not increase mental health stigma and may instead result in various positive outcomes. The degree to which these outcomes manifest in a specific setting, however, may vary. Future research should seek to identify contextual factors that support actualization of positive outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).