Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-04-13DOI: 10.1037/ser0000760
Whitney S Livingston, Sarah P Carter, Rebecca Leitner, Andrew T Ton, Heather Gebhardt, Lori A Zoellner, Natalie Mizik, Sasha M Rojas, Jonathan R Buchholz, Mark A Reger
Caring Letters is a prevention program aimed at reducing suicide risk; however, clinical trials indicate mixed results among military and veteran samples. The present study aimed to pilot a new version of the Caring Letters intervention that was adapted to military culture in order to emphasize peer support. The supportive letters, traditionally sent from clinicians, were written by peer veterans (PVs) who volunteered from local Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs). PVs (n = 15) attended a 4-hr workshop to learn about Caring Letters and write six letters to a veteran with a recent hospitalization for suicide risk (hospitalized veterans [HVs]; n = 15 completed a baseline assessment). Letters from PVs were sent to HVs once a month for 6 months following discharge from the psychiatric inpatient unit. The study used a limited efficacy approach to examine feasibility outcomes including implementation procedures, participant recruitment and retention rates, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability measures examined HV satisfaction, perceived privacy and safety, and PV workshop satisfaction. Among HVs, results suggested that suicidal ideation improved from baseline to follow-up (g = 3.19). Results suggested resilience scores improved among HVs (g = 0.99). Results also suggested a possible reduction in stigma associated with mental health treatment among PVs at 1-month postworkshop assessment. Interpretation of the results is limited by the design and sample size, but the results provide preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of a PV approach to Caring Letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A peer veteran approach to the caring letters suicide prevention program: Preliminary data.","authors":"Whitney S Livingston, Sarah P Carter, Rebecca Leitner, Andrew T Ton, Heather Gebhardt, Lori A Zoellner, Natalie Mizik, Sasha M Rojas, Jonathan R Buchholz, Mark A Reger","doi":"10.1037/ser0000760","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caring Letters is a prevention program aimed at reducing suicide risk; however, clinical trials indicate mixed results among military and veteran samples. The present study aimed to pilot a new version of the Caring Letters intervention that was adapted to military culture in order to emphasize peer support. The supportive letters, traditionally sent from clinicians, were written by peer veterans (PVs) who volunteered from local Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs). PVs (<i>n</i> = 15) attended a 4-hr workshop to learn about Caring Letters and write six letters to a veteran with a recent hospitalization for suicide risk (hospitalized veterans [HVs]; <i>n</i> = 15 completed a baseline assessment). Letters from PVs were sent to HVs once a month for 6 months following discharge from the psychiatric inpatient unit. The study used a limited efficacy approach to examine feasibility outcomes including implementation procedures, participant recruitment and retention rates, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability measures examined HV satisfaction, perceived privacy and safety, and PV workshop satisfaction. Among HVs, results suggested that suicidal ideation improved from baseline to follow-up (<i>g</i> = 3.19). Results suggested resilience scores improved among HVs (<i>g</i> = 0.99). Results also suggested a possible reduction in stigma associated with mental health treatment among PVs at 1-month postworkshop assessment. Interpretation of the results is limited by the design and sample size, but the results provide preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of a PV approach to Caring Letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9294448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-06-22DOI: 10.1037/ser0000775
Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Winter Johnston, Annette Walder, Jan A Lindsay, Julianna B Hogan
This study examined differences in mental health characteristics of Veterans who received VA Video Connect (VVC) or audio-only care during initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort of Veterans with primary diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders (diagnosed between March 2019 and February 2020) was identified, and data were obtained for Veterans who engaged in virtual care from April to December 2020. Two groups were created: Veterans receiving audio-only care (n = 161,071) and Veterans receiving two or more VVC visits (n = 84,505). Multiple logistic regression models examined symptom severity in the year before COVID as a predictor of treatment modality during COVID. Chi-square tests examined associations between modality and the number of assessments. Symptom severity as evaluated by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 significantly predicted modality of encounters during the pandemic such that those who had moderate or severe symptoms prior to COVID-19 were more likely than those with low or no symptoms to have two or more VVC encounters during the pandemic. Of those who received VVC, 55.62% had no Patient Health Questionnaire-9 assessments compared to 68.96% of those who received audio-only. In the VVC group, 70.36% had no Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessments compared to 81.02% in the audio-only group. Taken together, these findings suggest that VVC, when compared to audio-only, was used during the pandemic to reach Veterans with more severe mental health symptomatology and to engage in administration of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The role of depression and anxiety symptom severity in remotely delivered mental health care.","authors":"Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Winter Johnston, Annette Walder, Jan A Lindsay, Julianna B Hogan","doi":"10.1037/ser0000775","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000775","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined differences in mental health characteristics of Veterans who received VA Video Connect (VVC) or audio-only care during initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort of Veterans with primary diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders (diagnosed between March 2019 and February 2020) was identified, and data were obtained for Veterans who engaged in virtual care from April to December 2020. Two groups were created: Veterans receiving audio-only care (<i>n</i> = 161,071) and Veterans receiving two or more VVC visits (<i>n</i> = 84,505). Multiple logistic regression models examined symptom severity in the year before COVID as a predictor of treatment modality during COVID. Chi-square tests examined associations between modality and the number of assessments. Symptom severity as evaluated by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 significantly predicted modality of encounters during the pandemic such that those who had moderate or severe symptoms prior to COVID-19 were more likely than those with low or no symptoms to have two or more VVC encounters during the pandemic. Of those who received VVC, 55.62% had no Patient Health Questionnaire-9 assessments compared to 68.96% of those who received audio-only. In the VVC group, 70.36% had no Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessments compared to 81.02% in the audio-only group. Taken together, these findings suggest that VVC, when compared to audio-only, was used during the pandemic to reach Veterans with more severe mental health symptomatology and to engage in administration of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10739638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9730439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-05-25DOI: 10.1037/ser0000776
Ana J Bridges, Jake C Steggerda, Linda E Guzman, Roselee J Ledesma
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a safety net for low-income individuals needing mental and/or physical health care. The COVID-19 pandemic required FQHCs (and other health organizations) to pivot rapidly to telehealth. In theory, telehealth services can expand access to needed care. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a natural opportunity to "test" this assumption. We compared sociodemographic differences in patients accessing behavioral health services pre- and peri-COVID-19 at an FQHC. We also investigated potential patient sociodemographic disparities in telebehavioral health service use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from a single FQHC (13 sites, 4 integrated primary care medical clinics) in the southern United States. Participants included 5,190 patients (69.2% female, 59.7% persons of color) attending a total of 16,474 behavioral health sessions across 2 years (one pre- and one peri-COVID-19). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, 100% of behavioral health visits were conducted in person. During the pandemic, nearly half of behavioral health visits were conducted via telehealth. Telehealth visits were most frequently attended by adults, non-Latinx Whites, women, and people making ≤ 200% of the federal poverty level. A combination of in-person and telehealth service delivery models should be used by FQHCs to maximize access to care for different demographic groups. FQHCs should consider key factors (e.g., access, ableism, technology facility, and language) to increase patients' ability to take advantage of telehealth services where available. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Telebehavioral health at a federally qualified health center pre- and peri-COVID-19.","authors":"Ana J Bridges, Jake C Steggerda, Linda E Guzman, Roselee J Ledesma","doi":"10.1037/ser0000776","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a safety net for low-income individuals needing mental and/or physical health care. The COVID-19 pandemic required FQHCs (and other health organizations) to pivot rapidly to telehealth. In theory, telehealth services can expand access to needed care. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a natural opportunity to \"test\" this assumption. We compared sociodemographic differences in patients accessing behavioral health services pre- and peri-COVID-19 at an FQHC. We also investigated potential patient sociodemographic disparities in telebehavioral health service use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from a single FQHC (13 sites, 4 integrated primary care medical clinics) in the southern United States. Participants included 5,190 patients (69.2% female, 59.7% persons of color) attending a total of 16,474 behavioral health sessions across 2 years (one pre- and one peri-COVID-19). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, 100% of behavioral health visits were conducted in person. During the pandemic, nearly half of behavioral health visits were conducted via telehealth. Telehealth visits were most frequently attended by adults, non-Latinx Whites, women, and people making ≤ 200% of the federal poverty level. A combination of in-person and telehealth service delivery models should be used by FQHCs to maximize access to care for different demographic groups. FQHCs should consider key factors (e.g., access, ableism, technology facility, and language) to increase patients' ability to take advantage of telehealth services where available. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9892838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-02-09DOI: 10.1037/ser0000745
Natalie R Holt, Elliott Botelho, Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger, Kirsty A Clark
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations face heightened risk of suicide compared to their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts, and a previous suicide attempt is among the strongest predictors of suicide mortality. Despite this increased risk, limited research has explored mental health help-seeking behavior and previous mental health care experiences of SGM individuals among the highest risk for suicide-individuals with a recent, near-fatal suicide attempt. This study presents thematic analysis results of interviews with 22 SGM individuals who reported at least one near-fatal suicide attempt in the past 18 months. Identified themes were (a) factors that affect help-seeking for SGM individuals with a recent, near-fatal suicide attempt, including previous mental health care experiences, support systems, and structural barriers and facilitators; (b) hospitalization is not a one-size fits all solution; and (c) recommendations for improving care for this population. Findings demonstrate that anti-SGM stigma may magnify existing barriers to mental health care across all socioecological levels. Notably, participants cited a fear of loss of autonomy from inpatient hospitalization and previous discriminatory experiences when seeking mental health care as hampering help-seeking. Given increased risk for suicide mortality, this patient population is a necessary stakeholder in suicide prevention and intervention development and policy discussions affecting mental health care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Previous mental health care and help-seeking experiences: Perspectives from sexual and gender minority survivors of near-fatal suicide attempts.","authors":"Natalie R Holt, Elliott Botelho, Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger, Kirsty A Clark","doi":"10.1037/ser0000745","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations face heightened risk of suicide compared to their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts, and a previous suicide attempt is among the strongest predictors of suicide mortality. Despite this increased risk, limited research has explored mental health help-seeking behavior and previous mental health care experiences of SGM individuals among the highest risk for suicide-individuals with a recent, near-fatal suicide attempt. This study presents thematic analysis results of interviews with 22 SGM individuals who reported at least one near-fatal suicide attempt in the past 18 months. Identified themes were (a) <i>factors that affect help-seeking</i> for SGM individuals with a recent, near-fatal suicide attempt, including previous mental health care experiences, support systems, and structural barriers and facilitators; (b) <i>hospitalization is not a one-size fits all solution</i>; and (c) <i>recommendations for improving care</i> for this population. Findings demonstrate that anti-SGM stigma may magnify existing barriers to mental health care across all socioecological levels. Notably, participants cited a fear of loss of autonomy from inpatient hospitalization and previous discriminatory experiences when seeking mental health care as hampering help-seeking. Given increased risk for suicide mortality, this patient population is a necessary stakeholder in suicide prevention and intervention development and policy discussions affecting mental health care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409874/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9961944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-10-12DOI: 10.1037/ser0000810
Julija Stelmokas, Lauren N Ratcliffe, Ketrin Lengu, Robert J Spencer
This study evaluated the quality of direct-to-home teleneuropsychology (teleNP) services that offered patients choice of service modality. We conducted a quality assurance project in a sample of Veterans (N = 143) referred for a variety of referral reasons from a Midwestern Veteran Affairs Hospital. Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted between February and June 2021 during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated teleNP rate of use, factors influencing acceptability and feasibility, and cost savings. Approximately 40% of our scheduled patients completed full direct-to-home teleNP, with about 80% of our sample choosing at least one telehealth encounter as part of their evaluation. Age was a significant factor in predicting full teleNP use, with older adults preferring in-person testing. Digital divide consults (i.e., loaned tablets) led to an increase in teleNP use. Those utilizing full teleNP (interview, assessment, feedback) benefited from cost and travel distance savings. Most Veterans in our Midwestern Veteran Affairs Hospital used teleNP services during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with utilization influenced by specific patient demographics (i.e., age) and access to technology. Offering Veteran choice of assessment modality (in-person or video teleNP) was associated with significant cost reduction due to mileage savings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Evaluation of teleneuropsychology services in veterans during COVID-19.","authors":"Julija Stelmokas, Lauren N Ratcliffe, Ketrin Lengu, Robert J Spencer","doi":"10.1037/ser0000810","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the quality of direct-to-home teleneuropsychology (teleNP) services that offered patients choice of service modality. We conducted a quality assurance project in a sample of Veterans (<i>N</i> = 143) referred for a variety of referral reasons from a Midwestern Veteran Affairs Hospital. Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted between February and June 2021 during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated teleNP rate of use, factors influencing acceptability and feasibility, and cost savings. Approximately 40% of our scheduled patients completed full direct-to-home teleNP, with about 80% of our sample choosing at least one telehealth encounter as part of their evaluation. Age was a significant factor in predicting full teleNP use, with older adults preferring in-person testing. Digital divide consults (i.e., loaned tablets) led to an increase in teleNP use. Those utilizing full teleNP (interview, assessment, feedback) benefited from cost and travel distance savings. Most Veterans in our Midwestern Veteran Affairs Hospital used teleNP services during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with utilization influenced by specific patient demographics (i.e., age) and access to technology. Offering Veteran choice of assessment modality (in-person or video teleNP) was associated with significant cost reduction due to mileage savings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41210625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1037/ser0000772
Jeffrey A Cully, Ellen P Fischer, Raquel Gonzalez, James S Williams, Shubhada Sansgiry, Darrell Zeno, Dinesh Mittal, Irving Kuo
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered the way in which health care is delivered, challenging providers, and systems of care to innovate to maintain access to services. This article describes the delivery of mental health services during the pandemic in two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regions that include 15 hospitals and over 100 outpatient facilities in the southern United States. Data were derived from (a) a survey of provider perspectives (n = 1,175) on delivering mental health care prior to and during the pandemic and (b) VHA administrative data on mental health service delivery. Providers reported that access, quality, and timeliness of services remained high during the pandemic; indicated increased use of telehealth services; and reported challenges in delivering evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and measurement-based care (MBC). Administrative data indicated no drop in the number of Veterans receiving mental health care during the pandemic but showed fewer total visits relative to prepandemic levels and confirmed a dramatic increase in telehealth services during the first 6 months of the pandemic (+ 459% telephone and + 202% video) and a decrease in use of EBPs (-28%) and MBC (-31%). Data at 12 months showed a continued increase in video services (+ 357%) and modest improvement in EBP and MBC use. Rapid shifts in the use of telehealth services, coupled with organizational efforts, ensured that Veterans continued to have access to mental health services during the pandemic. Although mental health services remained accessible, challenges existed in the delivery of specialized mental health services, including EBPs and MBC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
COVID-19 大流行极大地改变了医疗服务的提供方式,对医疗服务提供者和医疗系统提出了挑战,要求他们进行创新以保持服务的可及性。本文介绍了大流行期间退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)在美国南部两个地区(包括 15 家医院和 100 多家门诊机构)提供心理健康服务的情况。数据来源于:(a)对医疗服务提供者(n=1,175)在大流行之前和期间提供心理健康医疗服务的观点调查;(b)退伍军人健康管理局提供心理健康服务的行政数据。医疗服务提供者报告说,在大流行期间,服务的可及性、质量和及时性仍然很高;他们表示对远程医疗服务的使用有所增加;他们还报告了在提供循证心理治疗(EBPs)和基于测量的医疗服务(MBC)方面所面临的挑战。管理数据显示,大流行期间接受心理健康护理的退伍军人人数没有下降,但总就诊人次与大流行前相比有所减少,并证实在大流行的前 6 个月,远程医疗服务急剧增加(电话服务增加了 459%,视频服务增加了 202%),而 EBPs 和 MBC 的使用则有所减少(-28%)和(-31%)。12 个月的数据显示,视频服务继续增加(+ 357%),EBP 和 MBC 的使用略有改善。远程医疗服务使用的快速转变,加上组织的努力,确保了退伍军人在大流行期间继续获得心理健康服务。尽管心理健康服务仍然可以获得,但在提供专门的心理健康服务(包括 EBPs 和 MBC)方面仍存在挑战。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Provider perceptions and use of mental health services in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Jeffrey A Cully, Ellen P Fischer, Raquel Gonzalez, James S Williams, Shubhada Sansgiry, Darrell Zeno, Dinesh Mittal, Irving Kuo","doi":"10.1037/ser0000772","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000772","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered the way in which health care is delivered, challenging providers, and systems of care to innovate to maintain access to services. This article describes the delivery of mental health services during the pandemic in two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regions that include 15 hospitals and over 100 outpatient facilities in the southern United States. Data were derived from (a) a survey of provider perspectives (<i>n</i> = 1,175) on delivering mental health care prior to and during the pandemic and (b) VHA administrative data on mental health service delivery. Providers reported that access, quality, and timeliness of services remained high during the pandemic; indicated increased use of telehealth services; and reported challenges in delivering evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and measurement-based care (MBC). Administrative data indicated no drop in the number of Veterans receiving mental health care during the pandemic but showed fewer total visits relative to prepandemic levels and confirmed a dramatic increase in telehealth services during the first 6 months of the pandemic (+ 459% telephone and + 202% video) and a decrease in use of EBPs (-28%) and MBC (-31%). Data at 12 months showed a continued increase in video services (+ 357%) and modest improvement in EBP and MBC use. Rapid shifts in the use of telehealth services, coupled with organizational efforts, ensured that Veterans continued to have access to mental health services during the pandemic. Although mental health services remained accessible, challenges existed in the delivery of specialized mental health services, including EBPs and MBC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9552358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-10-19DOI: 10.1037/ser0000804
Alejandro L Vázquez, Melanie M Domenech Rodríguez, Germán A Cadenas, Tyson S Barrett, Cynthia M Navarro Flores
A lack of validated measures to examine barriers to youth telepsychology services among Latinx families limits research that could identify targets for reducing mental health disparities. We developed and validated the Latinx Barriers to Accessing Telepsychology Services (Latinx BATS) questionnaire, a brief multidimensional measure for caregivers of youths. Participants included 511 Latinx caregivers of youths Ages 6-18 (English n = 275, Spanish n = 236) who completed the Latinx BATS and reported on telepsychology service utilization and youth mental health problems. Caregivers whose youths had clinically elevated mental health problems were more likely to report barriers to accessing youth telepsychology services compared to nonclinical youths. Commonly endorsed barriers included concerns that the child would be distracted and not get much benefit, and that providers would be unfamiliar with the family's culture or would not pick up on nuances and emotions. Loadings from an exploratory graph analysis returned four-factors: relational, acceptability, quality, and access concerns. Network centrality measures identified provider knowledge regarding community resources and Latinx culture as important targets for reducing barriers to youth telepsychology services. Confirmatory factor analyses were then conducted and found that the four-factor structure outperformed a single-factor solution. The four-factor structure was similar for the English and Spanish versions of the Latinx BATS, but the strength of item loadings varied across languages. Implications for the use of the Latinx BATS in research and clinical practice are discussed including specific strategies for reducing these obstacles to care among Latinx families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Barriers to accessing telepsychology services questionnaire: Structure and language-based performance in a sample of Latinx caregivers.","authors":"Alejandro L Vázquez, Melanie M Domenech Rodríguez, Germán A Cadenas, Tyson S Barrett, Cynthia M Navarro Flores","doi":"10.1037/ser0000804","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A lack of validated measures to examine barriers to youth telepsychology services among Latinx families limits research that could identify targets for reducing mental health disparities. We developed and validated the Latinx Barriers to Accessing Telepsychology Services (Latinx BATS) questionnaire, a brief multidimensional measure for caregivers of youths. Participants included 511 Latinx caregivers of youths Ages 6-18 (English <i>n</i> = 275, Spanish <i>n</i> = 236) who completed the Latinx BATS and reported on telepsychology service utilization and youth mental health problems. Caregivers whose youths had clinically elevated mental health problems were more likely to report barriers to accessing youth telepsychology services compared to nonclinical youths. Commonly endorsed barriers included concerns that the child would be distracted and not get much benefit, and that providers would be unfamiliar with the family's culture or would not pick up on nuances and emotions. Loadings from an exploratory graph analysis returned four-factors: relational, acceptability, quality, and access concerns. Network centrality measures identified provider knowledge regarding community resources and Latinx culture as important targets for reducing barriers to youth telepsychology services. Confirmatory factor analyses were then conducted and found that the four-factor structure outperformed a single-factor solution. The four-factor structure was similar for the English and Spanish versions of the Latinx BATS, but the strength of item loadings varied across languages. Implications for the use of the Latinx BATS in research and clinical practice are discussed including specific strategies for reducing these obstacles to care among Latinx families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"50-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49681640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2022-08-11DOI: 10.1037/ser0000696
Robyn L Shepardson, Terri L Fletcher, Jennifer S Funderburk, Risa B Weisberg, Gregory P Beehler, Stephen A Maisto
Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Barriers to and facilitators of using evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions in integrated primary care practice.","authors":"Robyn L Shepardson, Terri L Fletcher, Jennifer S Funderburk, Risa B Weisberg, Gregory P Beehler, Stephen A Maisto","doi":"10.1037/ser0000696","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"709-722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9425731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2022-10-13DOI: 10.1037/ser0000716
Eric J Hawkins, Aline M Lott, Anissa N Danner, Carol A Malte, Patrick L Dulin, John C Fortney, George G Sayre, John S Baer
Unhealthy alcohol use is common among Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans, yet barriers discourage treatment-seeking. Mobile applications (apps) that deliver alcohol interventions have potential to address these barriers and increase treatment receipt. Few studies have qualitatively assessed users' experiences with apps to manage alcohol use. We assessed OEF/OIF veterans' experiences with Step Away, an app to reduce alcohol-related risks, to identify factors that may influence engagement. This single-arm pilot study recruited OEF/OIF veterans with positive alcohol screens nationwide using mail/telephone. Veterans aged 18-55 who exceeded drinking guidelines and owned an iPhone were eligible. Twenty-one (16 men, 5 women) of 55 participants completed interviews. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants found Step Away easy to use, although setup was time consuming. Participants reported increased awareness of alcohol use, highlighting daily assessment, weekly feedback, goal setting, and high-risk notification features as helpful and associated awareness with an intent to decrease use. Participants described Step Away as informative, with over half reporting they would use it outside of the study and most recommending it. Suggestions for improvement included greater personalization and control over features. Step Away features appear to influence engagement and increase users' awareness about alcohol consumed and factors associated with drinking, as well as intent to change. Assessment, feedback, and customization features of apps may facilitate app engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"U.S. veterans' experiences and factors associated with use of a smartphone application to self-manage unhealthy alcohol use.","authors":"Eric J Hawkins, Aline M Lott, Anissa N Danner, Carol A Malte, Patrick L Dulin, John C Fortney, George G Sayre, John S Baer","doi":"10.1037/ser0000716","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unhealthy alcohol use is common among Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans, yet barriers discourage treatment-seeking. Mobile applications (apps) that deliver alcohol interventions have potential to address these barriers and increase treatment receipt. Few studies have qualitatively assessed users' experiences with apps to manage alcohol use. We assessed OEF/OIF veterans' experiences with Step Away, an app to reduce alcohol-related risks, to identify factors that may influence engagement. This single-arm pilot study recruited OEF/OIF veterans with positive alcohol screens nationwide using mail/telephone. Veterans aged 18-55 who exceeded drinking guidelines and owned an iPhone were eligible. Twenty-one (16 men, 5 women) of 55 participants completed interviews. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants found Step Away easy to use, although setup was time consuming. Participants reported increased awareness of alcohol use, highlighting daily assessment, weekly feedback, goal setting, and high-risk notification features as helpful and associated awareness with an intent to decrease use. Participants described Step Away as informative, with over half reporting they would use it outside of the study and most recommending it. Suggestions for improvement included greater personalization and control over features. Step Away features appear to influence engagement and increase users' awareness about alcohol consumed and factors associated with drinking, as well as intent to change. Assessment, feedback, and customization features of apps may facilitate app engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"908-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9296328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2022-09-22DOI: 10.1037/ser0000713
Rebecca K Sripada, Heather M Walters
Although most posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care in the Veterans health administration (VHA) is provided on an outpatient basis, the VHA has 40 residential rehabilitation treatment programs (RRTPs) designed to treat Veterans who require more intensive and closely monitored care. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes of these programs are modest, and previous attempts to identify key drivers of outcomes have uncovered few modifiable factors. The present study, informed by the model of resources, life events and changes in psychological state, was designed to identify factors associated with treatment response among RRTP patients and providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and 12 providers at three regional RRTPs, using interview guides based on the theoretical model. Data were analyzed using rapid analysis. Results showed that patients and providers agreed on several factors critical to RRTP success. These factors included the provision of evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP), support and understanding from fellow patients, and skill and support from providers. Patients and providers also noted the importance of psychological flexibility, openness, and willingness to change. Patients who experienced less symptom improvement over the course of treatment were more likely to report poor therapeutic alliance. These findings underscore the importance of continued emphasis on EBP delivery but also suggest that RRTPs might find additional ways to capitalize on the residential milieu to encourage engagement in treatment and a focus on therapeutic change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"I wish people could come together like we have,\" patient and provider perspectives on VA residential PTSD treatment.","authors":"Rebecca K Sripada, Heather M Walters","doi":"10.1037/ser0000713","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000713","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although most posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care in the Veterans health administration (VHA) is provided on an outpatient basis, the VHA has 40 residential rehabilitation treatment programs (RRTPs) designed to treat Veterans who require more intensive and closely monitored care. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes of these programs are modest, and previous attempts to identify key drivers of outcomes have uncovered few modifiable factors. The present study, informed by the model of resources, life events and changes in psychological state, was designed to identify factors associated with treatment response among RRTP patients and providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and 12 providers at three regional RRTPs, using interview guides based on the theoretical model. Data were analyzed using rapid analysis. Results showed that patients and providers agreed on several factors critical to RRTP success. These factors included the provision of evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP), support and understanding from fellow patients, and skill and support from providers. Patients and providers also noted the importance of psychological flexibility, openness, and willingness to change. Patients who experienced less symptom improvement over the course of treatment were more likely to report poor therapeutic alliance. These findings underscore the importance of continued emphasis on EBP delivery but also suggest that RRTPs might find additional ways to capitalize on the residential milieu to encourage engagement in treatment and a focus on therapeutic change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"809-819"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249047/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10014710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}