Duane D Booysen, Sheila A M Rauch, Princess Shabangu, Lerato Leboho
Implementation science (IS) has received increased attention as it provides a means to bridge the know-do gap to implement evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Against this backdrop, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a global mental health concern (Koenen et al., 2017), especially in low- and middle-income countries characterized by limited trained health professionals, infrastructure, and limited access to evidence-based mental health care (Chen et al., 2017). Over the last 3 decades, effective trauma-focused psychotherapies (TFPs) for PTSD have been developed (Hamblen et al., 2019). Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is a first-line TFP for PTSD (Hamblen et al., 2019), yet the dissemination and implementation of PE have been limited to specialty care settings in developed or industrialized countries (Booysen & Kagee, 2020). Implementation science provides an opportunity for disseminating and implementing TFPs like PE in low- and middle-income countries. This article describes mixed-method data from a pilot implementation study of an abbreviated version of PE, known as prolonged exposure for primary care (S. A. M. Rauch, Kim, et al., 2023), in a semirural city in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. Importantly, prolonged exposure for primary care shows a significant reduction in PTSD when provided by lay counselors and good feasibility and acceptability. In addition, we reflect on the barriers and facilitators related to implementation research within a low-resourced community, namely, (a) training lay counselors, (b) cultural diversity, and (c) mental health literacy. Mental health literacy is proposed as an essential component to consider in implementation science, especially in low-resourced communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
实施科学(IS)为弥合 "知与行 "之间的差距,在现实环境中实施循证干预措施提供了一种手段,因此受到越来越多的关注。在此背景下,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)成为全球关注的心理健康问题(Koenen et al.在过去的 30 年中,针对创伤后应激障碍的有效创伤心理疗法(TFPs)得到了发展(Hamblen 等人,2019 年)。延长暴露疗法(PE)是治疗创伤后应激障碍的一线心理疗法(Hamblen 等人,2019 年),但该疗法的推广和实施仅限于发达国家或工业化国家的专科护理机构(Booysen & Kagee,2020 年)。实施科学为在中低收入国家推广和实施 PE 等全要素生产率提供了机会。本文介绍了在南非东开普省的一个半农村城市开展的一项试点实施研究的混合方法数据,该研究是 PE 的缩略版,被称为 "基层医疗的长期暴露"(S. A. M. Rauch, Kim 等人,2023 年)。重要的是,在由非专业咨询师提供基础护理的情况下,长期暴露可显著减少创伤后应激障碍的发生,而且具有良好的可行性和可接受性。此外,我们还反思了在资源匮乏的社区开展实施研究的障碍和促进因素,即:(a)培训非专业咨询师;(b)文化多样性;以及(c)心理健康素养。建议将心理健康素养作为实施科学的一个重要组成部分,尤其是在资源匮乏的社区。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Task-shifting of prolonged exposure for primary care (PE-PC) for PTSD in a semirural setting in South Africa: A pilot implementation study.","authors":"Duane D Booysen, Sheila A M Rauch, Princess Shabangu, Lerato Leboho","doi":"10.1037/ser0000896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000896","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation science (IS) has received increased attention as it provides a means to bridge the know-do gap to implement evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Against this backdrop, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a global mental health concern (Koenen et al., 2017), especially in low- and middle-income countries characterized by limited trained health professionals, infrastructure, and limited access to evidence-based mental health care (Chen et al., 2017). Over the last 3 decades, effective trauma-focused psychotherapies (TFPs) for PTSD have been developed (Hamblen et al., 2019). Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is a first-line TFP for PTSD (Hamblen et al., 2019), yet the dissemination and implementation of PE have been limited to specialty care settings in developed or industrialized countries (Booysen & Kagee, 2020). Implementation science provides an opportunity for disseminating and implementing TFPs like PE in low- and middle-income countries. This article describes mixed-method data from a pilot implementation study of an abbreviated version of PE, known as prolonged exposure for primary care (S. A. M. Rauch, Kim, et al., 2023), in a semirural city in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. Importantly, prolonged exposure for primary care shows a significant reduction in PTSD when provided by lay counselors and good feasibility and acceptability. In addition, we reflect on the barriers and facilitators related to implementation research within a low-resourced community, namely, (a) training lay counselors, (b) cultural diversity, and (c) mental health literacy. Mental health literacy is proposed as an essential component to consider in implementation science, especially in low-resourced communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142018398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reintegration into civilian society following military separation is a challenging process. There is a dearth of research into the impact of these factors on Australian veteran reintegration. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the lived experience of Australian veterans during reintegration, through the lens of acculturative stress and identity. Ten interviews were conducted with ex-serving members of the Australian Defence Force. Post-1990 veterans of all genders, who were at least 18 years of age, from all service branches were eligible for the study. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes each with three main themes; acculturative stress (assimilation, societal issues, social isolation), and integrated identity (acceptance, integrated communities, and adapting to the civilian world). Each main theme contained two subthemes illustrating their significance. Difficulty integrating civilian and veteran identities was a key barrier to successful reintegration and negative separation experiences undermined integration of civilian and veteran identities. Acculturative stressors identified were poor understanding by family, community, and clinicians of the incompatibility between military and civilian cultures. Education is needed for clinicians, the community, and families about military culture and difficulties for veterans when reintegrating into civilian society. Support for reintegration should be tailored to the needs of veterans encompassing personally meaningful activities, use of military skills in civilian contexts, ongoing membership of the military community and engagement with other veterans. This will ultimately foster integration of veteran and civilian identities, enabling veterans to retain their veteran identity in a manner that is adaptive for the civilian context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
退伍后重新融入平民社会是一个具有挑战性的过程。有关这些因素对澳大利亚退伍军人重返社会的影响的研究还很缺乏。本现象学研究旨在从文化适应压力和身份认同的角度,探讨澳大利亚退伍军人在重返社会过程中的生活经历。研究人员对澳大利亚国防军的退役成员进行了十次访谈。年满 18 周岁的 1990 年后退伍军人,不分性别,来自所有兵种,均有资格参与研究。主题分析揭示了两个总体主题,每个主题有三个主要内容:文化适应压力(同化、社会问题、社会隔离)和综合身份(接受、综合社区和适应平民世界)。每个主题都包含两个次主题,以说明其重要性。难以融合平民身份和退伍军人身份是成功重返社会的主要障碍,而消极的离职经历破坏了平民身份和退伍军人身份的融合。文化适应压力因素包括家庭、社区和临床医生对军民文化不相容的理解不足。需要对临床医生、社区和家庭进行有关军事文化和退伍军人重新融入平民社会的困难的教育。应根据退伍军人的需求为其提供重返社会的支持,包括有个人意义的活动、在民事环境中使用军事技能、继续加入军事社区以及与其他退伍军人接触。这将最终促进退伍军人身份与平民身份的融合,使退伍军人能够以适应平民环境的方式保留其退伍军人身份。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Acculturative stress and identity challenges undermine the successful reintegration of Australian veterans.","authors":"Ayisha Miller, Lauren L Saling","doi":"10.1037/ser0000888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reintegration into civilian society following military separation is a challenging process. There is a dearth of research into the impact of these factors on Australian veteran reintegration. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the lived experience of Australian veterans during reintegration, through the lens of acculturative stress and identity. Ten interviews were conducted with ex-serving members of the Australian Defence Force. Post-1990 veterans of all genders, who were at least 18 years of age, from all service branches were eligible for the study. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes each with three main themes; acculturative stress (assimilation, societal issues, social isolation), and integrated identity (acceptance, integrated communities, and adapting to the civilian world). Each main theme contained two subthemes illustrating their significance. Difficulty integrating civilian and veteran identities was a key barrier to successful reintegration and negative separation experiences undermined integration of civilian and veteran identities. Acculturative stressors identified were poor understanding by family, community, and clinicians of the incompatibility between military and civilian cultures. Education is needed for clinicians, the community, and families about military culture and difficulties for veterans when reintegrating into civilian society. Support for reintegration should be tailored to the needs of veterans encompassing personally meaningful activities, use of military skills in civilian contexts, ongoing membership of the military community and engagement with other veterans. This will ultimately foster integration of veteran and civilian identities, enabling veterans to retain their veteran identity in a manner that is adaptive for the civilian context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142018392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wilson T Trusty, Brett E Scofield, Rebecca A Janis, Alaina L Cummins, Tyler D White
Academic withdrawal from colleges and universities is a common occurrence, particularly among students with mental health concerns. Receiving a successful course of psychotherapy may reduce students' risk of academic withdrawal, but outcomes in university counseling centers (UCCs) could be hindered by strategies used to meet high service demands with limited resources, such as offering a low number or frequency of sessions. The present study examined associations among psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal among students (N = 16,197) in short-term individual psychotherapy at 85 UCCs in the United States. Structural equation modeling results indicated that after controlling for baseline psychological distress, the number of psychotherapy sessions attended positively predicted, and the average number of days between sessions negatively predicted, clients' self-reported reductions in psychological distress. In turn, after controlling for pretreatment characteristics associated with academic withdrawal (prior psychiatric hospitalization, gender, academic distress) reductions in psychological distress negatively predicted therapists' report of clients voluntarily withdrawing from their academic institution during psychotherapy. This indicates that students who receive higher psychotherapy doses within a short-term context (i.e., 10 or fewer sessions) are less distressed by the end of treatment, which then predicts a lower likelihood of academic withdrawal during psychotherapy. UCC leadership and clinicians might enhance clinical and academic outcomes by providing flexibility in the number and frequency of psychotherapy sessions available to students. However, centers may need additional resources from their academic institutions to provide this flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
从高校退学是一种常见现象,尤其是在有心理健康问题的学生中。接受成功的心理治疗可能会降低学生退学的风险,但大学心理咨询中心(UCCs)为满足有限资源下的高服务需求而采取的策略(如提供较少的治疗次数或频率)可能会影响治疗效果。本研究考察了在美国85所大学心理咨询中心接受短期个体心理治疗的学生(人数=16197人)中心理治疗剂量、临床结果和退学之间的关系。结构方程建模结果表明,在控制了基线心理压力后,心理治疗的疗程次数对患者自我报告的心理压力减轻情况有正向预测作用,而疗程之间的平均间隔天数对患者自我报告的心理压力减轻情况有负向预测作用。反过来,在控制了与学业退学相关的治疗前特征(之前的精神病院治疗、性别、学业困扰)后,心理困扰的减轻对治疗师报告的客户在心理治疗期间自愿从学业机构退学的情况有负向预测作用。这表明,在短期内(即 10 次或更少疗程)接受较高剂量心理治疗的学生,在治疗结束时的心理压力较小,从而预示着在心理治疗期间退学的可能性较低。心理治疗中心的领导和临床医生可以通过灵活调整学生接受心理治疗的次数和频率来提高临床和学业成绩。不过,中心可能需要从其学术机构获得额外资源,以提供这种灵活性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal at university counseling centers.","authors":"Wilson T Trusty, Brett E Scofield, Rebecca A Janis, Alaina L Cummins, Tyler D White","doi":"10.1037/ser0000895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Academic withdrawal from colleges and universities is a common occurrence, particularly among students with mental health concerns. Receiving a successful course of psychotherapy may reduce students' risk of academic withdrawal, but outcomes in university counseling centers (UCCs) could be hindered by strategies used to meet high service demands with limited resources, such as offering a low number or frequency of sessions. The present study examined associations among psychotherapy dose, clinical outcome, and academic withdrawal among students (<i>N</i> = 16,197) in short-term individual psychotherapy at 85 UCCs in the United States. Structural equation modeling results indicated that after controlling for baseline psychological distress, the number of psychotherapy sessions attended positively predicted, and the average number of days between sessions negatively predicted, clients' self-reported reductions in psychological distress. In turn, after controlling for pretreatment characteristics associated with academic withdrawal (prior psychiatric hospitalization, gender, academic distress) reductions in psychological distress negatively predicted therapists' report of clients voluntarily withdrawing from their academic institution during psychotherapy. This indicates that students who receive higher psychotherapy doses within a short-term context (i.e., 10 or fewer sessions) are less distressed by the end of treatment, which then predicts a lower likelihood of academic withdrawal during psychotherapy. UCC leadership and clinicians might enhance clinical and academic outcomes by providing flexibility in the number and frequency of psychotherapy sessions available to students. However, centers may need additional resources from their academic institutions to provide this flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marley F Fradley, Justin Stanley, Xiaotong Han, Cassandra L McLaughlan, Nickolas Zaller, Lisa Evans, Melissa J Zielinski
Crisis Stabilization Units (CSUs) are short-term residential facilities that provide care to people experiencing mental health crises, seeking to reduce reliance on local emergency departments and avoid unnecessary jail detention. Despite these intentions, there is little foundational literature to support research on CSU efficacy and a dearth of research on the sociodemographic characteristics and specific needs of CSU patients. Here, we recruited and surveyed 208 participants admitted to one of two focal Arkansas CSUs on their sociodemographic characteristics, justice-involvement, mental health, substance use, and health care utilization. Results revealed that participants were mostly unemployed (68.16%), low-income (72.34%), and experiencing insecure housing (33.33%). They reported extensive justice-involvement (85.57%), high rates of clinically significant mental illness symptom severity (77.00% for anxious symptoms; 78.33% for depressive symptoms; 79.40% for traumatic stress symptoms), and recent substance use (73.34%). Recent engagement with other medical services was common, though more participants reported visiting an emergency department (42.23%) than did receiving outpatient medical care (26.73%). While research on CSU patient outcomes is needed, our results indicate that CSUs have the potential to be an essential part of the health care continuum by serving a population with multiple, intersecting needs and addressing a deficit in community-based crisis care. Continued investigation of community-based crisis intervention services is critical to bridging the gap between vital behavioral health resources and the populations in need of them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Arkansas crisis stabilization unit guests: Baseline characteristics from a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Marley F Fradley, Justin Stanley, Xiaotong Han, Cassandra L McLaughlan, Nickolas Zaller, Lisa Evans, Melissa J Zielinski","doi":"10.1037/ser0000893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crisis Stabilization Units (CSUs) are short-term residential facilities that provide care to people experiencing mental health crises, seeking to reduce reliance on local emergency departments and avoid unnecessary jail detention. Despite these intentions, there is little foundational literature to support research on CSU efficacy and a dearth of research on the sociodemographic characteristics and specific needs of CSU patients. Here, we recruited and surveyed 208 participants admitted to one of two focal Arkansas CSUs on their sociodemographic characteristics, justice-involvement, mental health, substance use, and health care utilization. Results revealed that participants were mostly unemployed (68.16%), low-income (72.34%), and experiencing insecure housing (33.33%). They reported extensive justice-involvement (85.57%), high rates of clinically significant mental illness symptom severity (77.00% for anxious symptoms; 78.33% for depressive symptoms; 79.40% for traumatic stress symptoms), and recent substance use (73.34%). Recent engagement with other medical services was common, though more participants reported visiting an emergency department (42.23%) than did receiving outpatient medical care (26.73%). While research on CSU patient outcomes is needed, our results indicate that CSUs have the potential to be an essential part of the health care continuum by serving a population with multiple, intersecting needs and addressing a deficit in community-based crisis care. Continued investigation of community-based crisis intervention services is critical to bridging the gap between vital behavioral health resources and the populations in need of them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2023-12-07DOI: 10.1037/ser0000827
Giselle Day, Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Darius B Dawson, Annette Walder, Julianna B Hogan, Jan A Lindsay
Black veterans experience disparities in mental health (MH) care access and are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Video telehealth to home (VTH) may reduce disparities by addressing barriers, particularly with pandemic-related shifts to remotely delivered care. Considering potential needs for tailored implementation across racial/ethnic groups, we examined differences in VTH use by non-Hispanic Black veterans versus all other races/ethnicities and among Black (Hispanic and non-Hispanic) veterans by age, rurality, and gender during the pandemic. We extracted a cohort of Veterans Health Administration-enrolled veterans receiving at least one MH encounter between October 2019 and September 2020 (n = 1,627,791) from electronic health records. Multilevel linear growth curve models examined the percentage of VTH use for non-Hispanic Black versus other races/ethnicities before and after pandemic onset. Black veteran-only subgroup analyses examined differences by ethnicity in percentage of VTH MH encounters since pandemic onset by age, rurality, and gender, using regression and analysis of covariance models. Despite significant increases in VTH during the pandemic, on average, VTH use was consistently lower for non-Hispanic Black veterans across both periods. During the pandemic, differences in VTH use between non-Hispanic Black and non-Black veterans accelerated over time. VTH use was greater during the pandemic for Black veterans who were Hispanic, younger, urban, and female. Adoption of VTH for MH was low for non-Hispanic Black veterans before COVID-19 and during COVID-19 compared to non-Black groups. Future VTH research and implementation efforts should question why adoption remains low, work to meet cultural needs, and promote equitable adoption for Black veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Black veteran use of video telehealth for mental health care.","authors":"Giselle Day, Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Darius B Dawson, Annette Walder, Julianna B Hogan, Jan A Lindsay","doi":"10.1037/ser0000827","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black veterans experience disparities in mental health (MH) care access and are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Video telehealth to home (VTH) may reduce disparities by addressing barriers, particularly with pandemic-related shifts to remotely delivered care. Considering potential needs for tailored implementation across racial/ethnic groups, we examined differences in VTH use by non-Hispanic Black veterans versus all other races/ethnicities and among Black (Hispanic and non-Hispanic) veterans by age, rurality, and gender during the pandemic. We extracted a cohort of Veterans Health Administration-enrolled veterans receiving at least one MH encounter between October 2019 and September 2020 (<i>n</i> = 1,627,791) from electronic health records. Multilevel linear growth curve models examined the percentage of VTH use for non-Hispanic Black versus other races/ethnicities before and after pandemic onset. Black veteran-only subgroup analyses examined differences by ethnicity in percentage of VTH MH encounters since pandemic onset by age, rurality, and gender, using regression and analysis of covariance models. Despite significant increases in VTH during the pandemic, on average, VTH use was consistently lower for non-Hispanic Black veterans across both periods. During the pandemic, differences in VTH use between non-Hispanic Black and non-Black veterans accelerated over time. VTH use was greater during the pandemic for Black veterans who were Hispanic, younger, urban, and female. Adoption of VTH for MH was low for non-Hispanic Black veterans before COVID-19 and during COVID-19 compared to non-Black groups. Future VTH research and implementation efforts should question why adoption remains low, work to meet cultural needs, and promote equitable adoption for Black veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"478-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138499215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1037/ser0000882
Ivy Tran, Jasmine Mote
With the rise of anti-Asian racism and discrimination that followed the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to improve Asian Americans' (AA) connection to and experiences with clinical care is critical. AA at risk for or experiencing psychosis represent a particularly vulnerable subset of a population that already exhibits low service utilization and a multitude of barriers to mental health care treatment. Considering that victimization and discrimination were well-documented factors that exacerbate psychotic symptoms prepandemic, preparing clinicians to adequately support this already hard-to-reach population warrants special attention. In this article, we argue for the importance of addressing the unique needs of this population in an acute time of need. We outline three main considerations for working with AA across the psychosis spectrum, including actionable steps clinicians can implement related to (a) the variability in AA identities, (b) the relationship between victimization and psychosis, and (c) improving access to culturally sensitive mental health care treatment. By considering the diverse needs of AA at risk for or living with psychosis, clinicians across professional levels and contexts can better serve this vulnerable population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
随着 COVID-19 大流行之后反亚裔种族主义和歧视的抬头,改善亚裔美国人(AA)与临床护理的联系和体验就显得至关重要。有精神病风险或经历过精神病的亚裔美国人是一个特别脆弱的群体,他们的服务利用率本来就很低,而且在接受心理保健治疗时还面临着重重障碍。考虑到受害和歧视是有据可查的加重流行前精神病症状的因素,临床医生为充分支持这一本已难以接触到的人群做好准备值得特别关注。在本文中,我们将论证在急需时满足这一人群独特需求的重要性。我们概述了与整个精神病谱系中的戒酒者合作的三个主要考虑因素,包括临床医生可以实施的与以下方面相关的可行步骤:(a)戒酒者身份的多变性;(b)受害与精神病之间的关系;以及(c)改善对文化敏感的心理保健治疗的获取途径。通过考虑有精神病风险或患有精神病的戒酒者的不同需求,不同专业水平和背景的临床医生可以更好地为这一弱势群体服务。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Considerations for working with Asian Americans across the psychosis spectrum following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Ivy Tran, Jasmine Mote","doi":"10.1037/ser0000882","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rise of anti-Asian racism and discrimination that followed the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to improve Asian Americans' (AA) connection to and experiences with clinical care is critical. AA at risk for or experiencing psychosis represent a particularly vulnerable subset of a population that already exhibits low service utilization and a multitude of barriers to mental health care treatment. Considering that victimization and discrimination were well-documented factors that exacerbate psychotic symptoms prepandemic, preparing clinicians to adequately support this already hard-to-reach population warrants special attention. In this article, we argue for the importance of addressing the unique needs of this population in an acute time of need. We outline three main considerations for working with AA across the psychosis spectrum, including actionable steps clinicians can implement related to (a) the variability in AA identities, (b) the relationship between victimization and psychosis, and (c) improving access to culturally sensitive mental health care treatment. By considering the diverse needs of AA at risk for or living with psychosis, clinicians across professional levels and contexts can better serve this vulnerable population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"406-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2023-10-12DOI: 10.1037/ser0000771
Tracey A Brickell, Megan M Wright, Jamie K Sullivan, Nicole V Varbedian, Anice M Byrd, Louis M French, Rael T Lange
To explore health outcomes in caregivers of service members and veterans (SMV) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) enrolled in two programs within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program (CSP) (General and Comprehensive Programs) and those not enrolled. Participants were 290 caregivers classified into three groups: (a) General Program (n = 34); (b) Comprehensive Program (n = 104); and (c) Not Enrolled (n = 152). Main outcome measures assessed caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQOL), SMV functional ability, and caregiver needs. Compared to the Not Enrolled group, the General, and Comprehensive Program groups reported worse scores on five of 25 caregiver HRQOL measures and had a higher proportion of elevated scores on two measures. The Comprehensive Program group reported worse scores on an additional seven HRQOL measures and a higher proportion of elevated scores on three measures compared to the Not Enrolled group. Over 20% of caregivers in each group reported clinically elevated scores on eight HRQOL measures. Few differences between caregiver groups were identified for unmet needs. In the total sample, eight HRQOL measures consistently emerged that were more strongly associated with caregiver needs. Caregivers enrolled in the VA CSP tended to report worse HRQOL and caring for a SMV with worse functional ability compared to those not enrolled. A better understanding of health care utilization for those not enrolled in the CSP and in need of help is required. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Health outcomes in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury enrolled in the U.S. Veterans Affairs Caregiver Support Program.","authors":"Tracey A Brickell, Megan M Wright, Jamie K Sullivan, Nicole V Varbedian, Anice M Byrd, Louis M French, Rael T Lange","doi":"10.1037/ser0000771","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore health outcomes in caregivers of service members and veterans (SMV) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) enrolled in two programs within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Caregiver Support Program (CSP) (General and Comprehensive Programs) and those not enrolled. Participants were 290 caregivers classified into three groups: (a) General Program (<i>n</i> = 34); (b) Comprehensive Program (<i>n</i> = 104); and (c) Not Enrolled (<i>n</i> = 152). Main outcome measures assessed caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQOL), SMV functional ability, and caregiver needs. Compared to the Not Enrolled group, the General, and Comprehensive Program groups reported worse scores on five of 25 caregiver HRQOL measures and had a higher proportion of elevated scores on two measures. The Comprehensive Program group reported worse scores on an additional seven HRQOL measures and a higher proportion of elevated scores on three measures compared to the Not Enrolled group. Over 20% of caregivers in each group reported clinically elevated scores on eight HRQOL measures. Few differences between caregiver groups were identified for unmet needs. In the total sample, eight HRQOL measures consistently emerged that were more strongly associated with caregiver needs. Caregivers enrolled in the VA CSP tended to report worse HRQOL and caring for a SMV with worse functional ability compared to those not enrolled. A better understanding of health care utilization for those not enrolled in the CSP and in need of help is required. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"635-648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41210626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2023-11-30DOI: 10.1037/ser0000824
Leslie S Taylor, Steve G Caloudas, Laura C Haney, Ellen Teng
The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013) is a well-validated self-report instrument intended to assess provisional diagnostic status and symptom severity of PTSD. With the recent release of the Department of Veterans Affairs measurement-based care initiative, the PCL-5 is now required to be used by VA-based PTSD Specialty Clinics to track and monitor patient progress in treatment. With the rise of telehealth modalities in response to the COVID pandemic, clinicians have turned to remote, asynchronous assessment (i.e., assessments completed without the provider present through remote platforms) as a means to provide best care to virtual patients and reduce time burden on providers. We review the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 along with relevant criticisms of the measure to provide recommendations for its optimal use through remote, asynchronous means. We also explore considerations for using remote, asynchronous assessment to assist with measurement-based care more broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
《精神障碍诊断与统计手册-5》创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表;Weathers et al., 2013)是一种经过良好验证的自我报告工具,旨在评估PTSD的临时诊断状态和症状严重程度。随着退伍军人事务部最近发布的基于测量的护理计划,PCL-5现在被要求由弗吉尼亚州的创伤后应激障碍专科诊所使用,以跟踪和监测患者的治疗进展。随着应对COVID大流行的远程医疗模式的兴起,临床医生已转向远程异步评估(即通过远程平台在提供者不在场的情况下完成评估),作为向虚拟患者提供最佳护理并减少提供者时间负担的一种手段。我们回顾了PCL-5的心理测量特性以及对该措施的相关批评,以通过远程、异步手段为其最佳使用提供建议。我们还探讨了使用远程、异步评估来更广泛地协助基于测量的护理的考虑。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Asynchronous assessment with the PCL-5: Practice considerations and recommendations.","authors":"Leslie S Taylor, Steve G Caloudas, Laura C Haney, Ellen Teng","doi":"10.1037/ser0000824","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5</i> (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013) is a well-validated self-report instrument intended to assess provisional diagnostic status and symptom severity of PTSD. With the recent release of the Department of Veterans Affairs measurement-based care initiative, the PCL-5 is now required to be used by VA-based PTSD Specialty Clinics to track and monitor patient progress in treatment. With the rise of telehealth modalities in response to the COVID pandemic, clinicians have turned to remote, asynchronous assessment (i.e., assessments completed without the provider present through remote platforms) as a means to provide best care to virtual patients and reduce time burden on providers. We review the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 along with relevant criticisms of the measure to provide recommendations for its optimal use through remote, asynchronous means. We also explore considerations for using remote, asynchronous assessment to assist with measurement-based care more broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"552-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138462245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-03-14DOI: 10.1037/ser0000852
Lillian A Hammer, Ava K Fergerson, Kelsey A Bonfils
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups experience exposure to minority stress, including discrimination, prejudice, microaggressions, and internalized stigma. Despite the sizable portion of the United States' population that identifies as SGM, relatively little research has been done to comprehensively understand the mental health consequences of SGM stress-particularly as they relate to serious mental illnesses (SMIs)-and SGM status is rarely reported in published studies. This article provides an overview of SGM research among people with SMIs as well as other relevant disorders. Findings show that sizable gaps remain in our knowledge of whether SGM groups experience higher rates or greater severity of SMIs, including schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders, though findings related to depressive and trauma-related disorders may be able to inform research and treatment for those with SMIs. To increase our understanding of potential mental health disparities for those with SMIs, researchers are encouraged to include measures to assess SGM identity, report upon this demographic information within their manuscripts, and examine differences in rates and severity of SMIs between these groups. Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate demographic questions into their standard intake batteries and initiate discussion of SGM status and minority stressors early on in treatment to promote more positive outcomes for this group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Recommendations for the assessment of sexual and gender minority status in serious mental illness research and clinical care.","authors":"Lillian A Hammer, Ava K Fergerson, Kelsey A Bonfils","doi":"10.1037/ser0000852","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups experience exposure to minority stress, including discrimination, prejudice, microaggressions, and internalized stigma. Despite the sizable portion of the United States' population that identifies as SGM, relatively little research has been done to comprehensively understand the mental health consequences of SGM stress-particularly as they relate to serious mental illnesses (SMIs)-and SGM status is rarely reported in published studies. This article provides an overview of SGM research among people with SMIs as well as other relevant disorders. Findings show that sizable gaps remain in our knowledge of whether SGM groups experience higher rates or greater severity of SMIs, including schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders, though findings related to depressive and trauma-related disorders may be able to inform research and treatment for those with SMIs. To increase our understanding of potential mental health disparities for those with SMIs, researchers are encouraged to include measures to assess SGM identity, report upon this demographic information within their manuscripts, and examine differences in rates and severity of SMIs between these groups. Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate demographic questions into their standard intake batteries and initiate discussion of SGM status and minority stressors early on in treatment to promote more positive outcomes for this group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"417-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140120438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1037/ser0000789
Tanya Garg, Cecilia M Votta, Neema Prakash, Patricia J Deldin
A large proportion of adults experiencing mental health problems do not receive care due to structural and attitudinal barriers. Mood Lifters (ML) is an evidence-based mental wellness program designed to reduce depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. This study aims to extend the literature by examining whether ML reduces posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and if childhood trauma (CT) affects treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that ML will be effective for all symptoms. However, we predicted that those who endorse higher levels of CT would experience a diminished impact of ML on their symptoms. Graduate students and young professionals (N = 221), a demographic that is known to have greater mental health concerns, were randomly assigned to either the waitlist condition (n = 78) or the intervention condition (n = 143). Before and after ML participation, participants completed a series of questionnaires about their symptoms. ML reduced symptoms of PTSD for participants who received the intervention relative to the waitlist. Further, we also observed that while the overall regression models with CT predict posttreatment scores for all the clinical symptoms, the CT variable itself was predictive of only posttreatment anxiety. Unexpectedly, given that CT is often associated with less improvement, we found that those at all levels of CT experienced similar reductions in depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms. Taken together, ML is a viable option to help people reduce depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD regardless of the level of CT exposure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
由于结构和态度上的障碍,很大一部分有心理健康问题的成年人得不到治疗。Mood Lifters(ML)是一项以证据为基础的心理健康计划,旨在减轻抑郁、焦虑和压力症状。本研究旨在通过考察 ML 是否会减轻创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状,以及童年创伤(CT)是否会影响治疗效果,来扩展相关文献。我们假设 ML 对所有症状都有效。但是,我们预测那些认可较高 CT 水平的人将会感受到 ML 对其症状的影响减弱。我们将研究生和年轻专业人士(人数=221)随机分配到候补名单条件(人数=78)或干预条件(人数=143)中,众所周知,这些人群对心理健康的关注度更高。在参与 ML 之前和之后,参与者填写了一系列有关其症状的问卷。与等待者相比,接受干预的参与者的创伤后应激障碍症状有所减轻。此外,我们还观察到,虽然带有 CT 的整体回归模型可以预测治疗后所有临床症状的得分,但 CT 变量本身只能预测治疗后的焦虑。令人意想不到的是,考虑到 CT 通常与改善程度较低有关,我们发现所有 CT 水平的患者在抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状方面的减轻程度相似。综上所述,无论接触 CT 的程度如何,ML 都是帮助人们减轻抑郁、焦虑、压力和创伤后应激障碍的可行选择。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"An investigation into the effectiveness of Mood Lifters in the context of trauma exposure.","authors":"Tanya Garg, Cecilia M Votta, Neema Prakash, Patricia J Deldin","doi":"10.1037/ser0000789","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large proportion of adults experiencing mental health problems do not receive care due to structural and attitudinal barriers. Mood Lifters (ML) is an evidence-based mental wellness program designed to reduce depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. This study aims to extend the literature by examining whether ML reduces posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and if childhood trauma (CT) affects treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that ML will be effective for all symptoms. However, we predicted that those who endorse higher levels of CT would experience a diminished impact of ML on their symptoms. Graduate students and young professionals (<i>N</i> = 221), a demographic that is known to have greater mental health concerns, were randomly assigned to either the waitlist condition (<i>n</i> = 78) or the intervention condition (<i>n</i> = 143). Before and after ML participation, participants completed a series of questionnaires about their symptoms. ML reduced symptoms of PTSD for participants who received the intervention relative to the waitlist. Further, we also observed that while the overall regression models with CT predict posttreatment scores for all the clinical symptoms, the CT variable itself was predictive of only posttreatment anxiety. Unexpectedly, given that CT is often associated with less improvement, we found that those at all levels of CT experienced similar reductions in depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms. Taken together, ML is a viable option to help people reduce depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD regardless of the level of CT exposure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"518-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10532272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}