Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-01-25DOI: 10.1037/ser0000830
Kelly L Harper, Daniel J Lee, Samantha Moshier, Ilana Zweig, Terence M Keane, Brian P Marx
Prior studies on individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) defined an adequate dose of psychotherapy as receiving at least nine sessions within a 15-week period. Yet, few studies have examined whether this definition of adequate dose is associated with meaningful change in PTSD symptoms over an extended period. To examine whether an adequate dose of individual or group psychotherapy was associated with PTSD symptom improvement, we identified mental health outpatient visits in the electronic medical record for a cohort of veterans enrolled in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services (N = 1,649) across 5 years. Using latent growth curve modeling, we estimated the effect of receiving an adequate dose of psychotherapy on the PTSD symptom course. Among the sample, 992 participants (60.16%) received at least one individual therapy session and 506 participants (30.7%) received at least one group therapy session; of those, 226 (22.78%) received an adequate dose of individual therapy and 212 (41.9%) received an adequate dose of group therapy, respectively. An adequate individual therapy dose, but not group therapy dose, was associated with a decrease in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) scores over time. This improvement was extremely gradual (average of 1.57 PCL-5 point decrease per year). Adequate dose of psychotherapy, defined as nine sessions of routine psychotherapy over 15 weeks, is associated with minimal symptom change. This suggests that commonly used definitions of adequate dose have minimal clinical utility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Is adequate dose adequate? An examination of the impact of psychotherapy on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms utilizing Veterans Health Administration medical records.","authors":"Kelly L Harper, Daniel J Lee, Samantha Moshier, Ilana Zweig, Terence M Keane, Brian P Marx","doi":"10.1037/ser0000830","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000830","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior studies on individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) defined an adequate dose of psychotherapy as receiving at least nine sessions within a 15-week period. Yet, few studies have examined whether this definition of adequate dose is associated with meaningful change in PTSD symptoms over an extended period. To examine whether an adequate dose of individual or group psychotherapy was associated with PTSD symptom improvement, we identified mental health outpatient visits in the electronic medical record for a cohort of veterans enrolled in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services (<i>N</i> = 1,649) across 5 years. Using latent growth curve modeling, we estimated the effect of receiving an adequate dose of psychotherapy on the PTSD symptom course. Among the sample, 992 participants (60.16%) received at least one individual therapy session and 506 participants (30.7%) received at least one group therapy session; of those, 226 (22.78%) received an adequate dose of individual therapy and 212 (41.9%) received an adequate dose of group therapy, respectively. An adequate individual therapy dose, but not group therapy dose, was associated with a decrease in PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> (PCL-5) scores over time. This improvement was extremely gradual (average of 1.57 PCL-5 point decrease per year). Adequate dose of psychotherapy, defined as nine sessions of routine psychotherapy over 15 weeks, is associated with minimal symptom change. This suggests that commonly used definitions of adequate dose have minimal clinical utility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139564726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1037/ser0000900
Imani T S Gibbs, Michael L Bourke, Vincent B Van Hasselt, Ryan A Black
Professional firefighters are routinely exposed to occupational stressors that place them at a higher risk of developing mental health symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. This article discusses findings of the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel, specifically the stressors that professional firefighters are exposed to on the job and their impact. Results indicated high levels of both occupational and individual stressors in this group. Common occupational and personal stressors and mental health symptomology endorsed by professional firefighters are discussed. Findings also revealed that about 40% of professional firefighters are facing clinically substantial levels of anxiety and depression, and more than 10% are experiencing clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress disorder in numbers surpassing the general population. Most professional firefighters indicated being adversely impacted by their duties but did not want to utilize services, which is in line with prior research. Suggestions for assisting professional firefighters in mitigating occupational and personal stress are presented, and proposals for future research are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
职业消防员经常面临职业压力,这些压力使他们出现心理健康症状(包括焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激反应)的风险更高。本文讨论了全国公共安全人员健康调查的结果,特别是职业消防员在工作中面临的压力及其影响。结果表明,该群体的职业和个人压力都很大。本文讨论了职业消防员常见的职业和个人压力以及他们认可的心理健康症状。研究结果还显示,约 40% 的职业消防员在临床上面临严重的焦虑和抑郁,10% 以上的职业消防员在临床上患有严重的创伤后应激障碍,其人数超过了普通人群。大多数职业消防员表示,他们的职责对他们产生了不利影响,但他们并不想利用相关服务,这与之前的研究结果一致。本文提出了帮助职业消防员减轻职业和个人压力的建议,并对未来的研究提出了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Professional firefighters: Findings from the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel.","authors":"Imani T S Gibbs, Michael L Bourke, Vincent B Van Hasselt, Ryan A Black","doi":"10.1037/ser0000900","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional firefighters are routinely exposed to occupational stressors that place them at a higher risk of developing mental health symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. This article discusses findings of the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel, specifically the stressors that professional firefighters are exposed to on the job and their impact. Results indicated high levels of both occupational and individual stressors in this group. Common occupational and personal stressors and mental health symptomology endorsed by professional firefighters are discussed. Findings also revealed that about 40% of professional firefighters are facing clinically substantial levels of anxiety and depression, and more than 10% are experiencing clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress disorder in numbers surpassing the general population. Most professional firefighters indicated being adversely impacted by their duties but did not want to utilize services, which is in line with prior research. Suggestions for assisting professional firefighters in mitigating occupational and personal stress are presented, and proposals for future research are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142111350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-03-14DOI: 10.1037/ser0000853
Katrina S Rbeiz, Jessica C Badawi, Chyna J Parker, Emily Blanco, Calvary Fielden, Alex Curland, Halle Ross-Young, Morgan Hill, Madeline Ward, Allison Mafarjeh, Michael Vitro, Erica Lee, Charlie A Davidson, Samantha J Reznik
Although there have been momentous and critical advancements in serious mental illness (SMI) psychology doctoral training models and competencies, there is still much systemic change needed to increase access to evidence-based SMI training for psychologists. In the last decade, there has been little to no growth or expansion of SMI training opportunities in clinical psychology doctoral programs in the United States, and psychologists are underrepresented in serving clients with SMI. As trainees and trainers committed to careers in SMI, the contributors aimed to identify barriers and facilitators throughout each stage of the SMI doctoral training pathway, including pregraduate school, graduate school, and internship to reflect critically on systemic issues that have impeded trainees from accessing the appropriate tools for SMI training. This conceptual article reviews the existing literature on barriers and facilitators to accessing SMI training. In centering trainee perspectives, the contributors also reflect on their own experiences through brief narratives illustrating the barriers and facilitators they have faced across training stages with existing empirical research. Recommendations made by the contributors include increasing access to financial support and mechanisms, diversifying departments and practicum sites to include SMI-focused training, and people in positions of power advocating for and centering trainee voices in departmental training decisions and development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Exploring trainee perspectives on barriers and facilitators in serious mental illness doctoral training.","authors":"Katrina S Rbeiz, Jessica C Badawi, Chyna J Parker, Emily Blanco, Calvary Fielden, Alex Curland, Halle Ross-Young, Morgan Hill, Madeline Ward, Allison Mafarjeh, Michael Vitro, Erica Lee, Charlie A Davidson, Samantha J Reznik","doi":"10.1037/ser0000853","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000853","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there have been momentous and critical advancements in serious mental illness (SMI) psychology doctoral training models and competencies, there is still much systemic change needed to increase access to evidence-based SMI training for psychologists. In the last decade, there has been little to no growth or expansion of SMI training opportunities in clinical psychology doctoral programs in the United States, and psychologists are underrepresented in serving clients with SMI. As trainees and trainers committed to careers in SMI, the contributors aimed to identify barriers and facilitators throughout each stage of the SMI doctoral training pathway, including pregraduate school, graduate school, and internship to reflect critically on systemic issues that have impeded trainees from accessing the appropriate tools for SMI training. This conceptual article reviews the existing literature on barriers and facilitators to accessing SMI training. In centering trainee perspectives, the contributors also reflect on their own experiences through brief narratives illustrating the barriers and facilitators they have faced across training stages with existing empirical research. Recommendations made by the contributors include increasing access to financial support and mechanisms, diversifying departments and practicum sites to include SMI-focused training, and people in positions of power advocating for and centering trainee voices in departmental training decisions and development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"20-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140120436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1037/ser0000879
Amanda Burgess-Proctor, Erin B Comartin, Megan Hicks, Sheryl Kubiak, Brandon Del Pozo
Research shows that jailed women have disproportionately elevated rates of behavioral health conditions, including serious mental illness and substance use disorders; however, jails have not been able to effectively address these needs. There is a research gap in our understanding of mental health screening tools, linkages to care, and behavioral health service utilization for jailed women, specifically across multiple jails situated in urban and rural contexts. This two-part study compares the behavioral health needs and service utilization of women and men in eight Michigan jails. Results show significant differences in women's and men's behavioral health needs, including proportions of severe mental illness, alcohol and drug misuse, opioid preference, concerns for withdrawal, and length of jail stays. Mental health outcomes show significant gendered differences in advocacy for early release and jail- and post-jail treatment engagement. These findings highlight the need for jails to better assess behavioral health needs among women and may inform interventions aimed at improving women's (and men's) experiences while jailed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
研究表明,被监禁女性的行为健康状况(包括严重精神疾病和药物使用失调)发生率过高;然而,监狱一直未能有效满足这些需求。我们对被监禁女性的心理健康筛查工具、护理链接和行为健康服务利用率的了解存在研究空白,特别是在城市和农村地区的多个监狱中。本研究由两部分组成,比较了密歇根州八所监狱中女性和男性的行为健康需求和服务利用情况。结果显示,女性和男性在行为健康需求方面存在明显差异,包括严重精神疾病的比例、酒精和药物滥用、阿片类药物偏好、对戒断的担忧以及监狱停留时间。心理健康结果显示,在主张提前释放、入狱和出狱后参与治疗方面存在明显的性别差异。这些发现突出表明,监狱需要更好地评估女性的行为健康需求,并为旨在改善女性(和男性)在狱中经历的干预措施提供信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"An exploratory two-part study of behavioral health service needs of women in jails.","authors":"Amanda Burgess-Proctor, Erin B Comartin, Megan Hicks, Sheryl Kubiak, Brandon Del Pozo","doi":"10.1037/ser0000879","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research shows that jailed women have disproportionately elevated rates of behavioral health conditions, including serious mental illness and substance use disorders; however, jails have not been able to effectively address these needs. There is a research gap in our understanding of mental health screening tools, linkages to care, and behavioral health service utilization for jailed women, specifically across multiple jails situated in urban and rural contexts. This two-part study compares the behavioral health needs and service utilization of women and men in eight Michigan jails. Results show significant differences in women's and men's behavioral health needs, including proportions of severe mental illness, alcohol and drug misuse, opioid preference, concerns for withdrawal, and length of jail stays. Mental health outcomes show significant gendered differences in advocacy for early release and jail- and post-jail treatment engagement. These findings highlight the need for jails to better assess behavioral health needs among women and may inform interventions aimed at improving women's (and men's) experiences while jailed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-02-08DOI: 10.1037/ser0000843
Shaynna N Herrera, Cansu Sarac, Shreya A Vaidya, Sophia Shuster, Romi Lyallpuri, Matthew F Dobbs, Jane Gorman, Antigone Phili, Alessia Mcgowan, Storm Portner, Maxwell Mikelic, Rachel Jespersen, Joseph S Deluca, Kayla Y Lim, Lawrence H Yang, Katarzyna Wyka, Yulia Landa, Cheryl M Corcoran
Individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) report a strong desire for psychoeducation, and clinical guidelines recommend psychoeducation in early psychosis care. Although several CHR psychoeducation models have been developed, additional research is needed to establish the effectiveness of these models. The goal of this study was to conduct a pilot trial of the Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need (BEGIN). BEGIN is a brief structured psychoeducation intervention designed to educate CHR individuals on symptoms and treatment options. We conducted a feasibility and pilot study of 25 CHR individuals (60% female, Mage = 20.6, 64% non-White, 52% Hispanic/Latino) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes. Qualitative interviews were administered to learn about their experience and analyzed using iterative thematic analysis. Participants (n = 12) completed pre- and post-BEGIN self-report measures to assess factors that influence treatment engagement, including CHR knowledge and motivation for therapy. Data were analyzed using Hedges' g effect sizes and paired samples t tests. The intervention completion rate (83%) and therapeutic alliance were high. Qualitative themes and quantitative measures converged on similar results showing how CHR individuals were impacted by receiving psychoeducation via BEGIN, including increased CHR knowledge (g = 1.37), competence to monitor symptoms (g = 0.53), hope (g = 0.87), and motivation for therapy (g = 0.46). This study demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefits of the BEGIN CHR psychoeducation model, including enhancing motivation for treatment. The flexible but standardized format can facilitate BEGIN's implementation and dissemination.This pilot study found that the Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need (BEGIN), a standardized five-session psychoeducation intervention for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR), was feasible, acceptable, and enhanced mental health literacy and motivation for subsequent treatment. Clinicians can utilize the BEGIN intervention to ensure the empathic provision of psychoeducation when disclosing patients' CHR status. Future research with a larger sample will establish efficacy and the development of a clinician training to facilitate implementation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
精神病临床高危人群(CHR)表示强烈希望接受心理教育,临床指南也建议在早期精神病护理中开展心理教育。虽然已经开发了几种 CHR 心理教育模式,但还需要更多的研究来确定这些模式的有效性。本研究的目的是对《有需要的个人简明教育指南》(BEGIN)进行试点。BEGIN 是一种简短的结构化心理教育干预措施,旨在向 CHR 患者讲解症状和治疗方案。我们对通过 "精神病风险综合征结构化访谈 "确定的 25 名 CHR 患者(女性占 60%,男性占 20.6%,非白人占 64%,西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔占 52%)进行了可行性试点研究。通过定性访谈了解他们的经历,并采用迭代主题分析法对其进行分析。参与者(n = 12)完成了 BEGIN 前和 BEGIN 后的自我报告测量,以评估影响治疗参与度的因素,包括 CHR 知识和治疗动机。数据采用赫奇斯 g效应大小和配对样本 t 检验进行分析。干预完成率(83%)和治疗联盟率都很高。定性主题和定量测量结果趋于一致,显示了通过 BEGIN 接受心理教育对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响,包括慢性阻塞性肺病知识的增加(g = 1.37)、监测症状的能力(g = 0.53)、希望(g = 0.87)和治疗动机(g = 0.46)。这项研究证明了 BEGIN CHR 心理教育模式的可行性、可接受性和潜在益处,包括增强治疗动机。这项试点研究发现,针对精神病临床高危人群(CHR)的标准化五节课心理教育干预--"贫困人群简明教育指南"(BEGIN)是可行的、可接受的,并能提高心理健康素养和后续治疗的积极性。临床医生可以利用 BEGIN 干预来确保在披露患者的 CHR 状态时,能以移情的方式提供心理教育。未来对更大样本的研究将确定其有效性,并开发临床医生培训以促进实施(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A feasibility and pilot trial of the Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need (BEGIN): Psychoeducation for individuals at risk for psychosis.","authors":"Shaynna N Herrera, Cansu Sarac, Shreya A Vaidya, Sophia Shuster, Romi Lyallpuri, Matthew F Dobbs, Jane Gorman, Antigone Phili, Alessia Mcgowan, Storm Portner, Maxwell Mikelic, Rachel Jespersen, Joseph S Deluca, Kayla Y Lim, Lawrence H Yang, Katarzyna Wyka, Yulia Landa, Cheryl M Corcoran","doi":"10.1037/ser0000843","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000843","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) report a strong desire for psychoeducation, and clinical guidelines recommend psychoeducation in early psychosis care. Although several CHR psychoeducation models have been developed, additional research is needed to establish the effectiveness of these models. The goal of this study was to conduct a pilot trial of the Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need (BEGIN). BEGIN is a brief structured psychoeducation intervention designed to educate CHR individuals on symptoms and treatment options. We conducted a feasibility and pilot study of 25 CHR individuals (60% female, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.6, 64% non-White, 52% Hispanic/Latino) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes. Qualitative interviews were administered to learn about their experience and analyzed using iterative thematic analysis. Participants (<i>n</i> = 12) completed pre- and post-BEGIN self-report measures to assess factors that influence treatment engagement, including CHR knowledge and motivation for therapy. Data were analyzed using Hedges' g effect sizes and paired samples t tests. The intervention completion rate (83%) and therapeutic alliance were high. Qualitative themes and quantitative measures converged on similar results showing how CHR individuals were impacted by receiving psychoeducation via BEGIN, including increased CHR knowledge (<i>g</i> = 1.37), competence to monitor symptoms (<i>g</i> = 0.53), hope (<i>g</i> = 0.87), and motivation for therapy (<i>g</i> = 0.46). This study demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefits of the BEGIN CHR psychoeducation model, including enhancing motivation for treatment. The flexible but standardized format can facilitate BEGIN's implementation and dissemination.This pilot study found that the Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need (BEGIN), a standardized five-session psychoeducation intervention for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR), was feasible, acceptable, and enhanced mental health literacy and motivation for subsequent treatment. Clinicians can utilize the BEGIN intervention to ensure the empathic provision of psychoeducation when disclosing patients' CHR status. Future research with a larger sample will establish efficacy and the development of a clinician training to facilitate implementation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"187-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139707681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth Casline, Lauren Henry, Katharine Reynolds, Kathleen I Díaz, Jessica Hawks, Laura Anthony, Sarah Kennedy
Partial hospitalization programs (PHPs) are increasingly relied upon to provide intensive mental health treatment for youth with acute and severely impairing mental health symptoms, yet very few interventions have been adapted to fit this unique delivery context. Transdiagnostic treatments hold promise for addressing the complex clinical presentations and workflow needs of PHP programs, but more work is needed to understand factors that influence successful implementation. We conducted a formative implementation process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing an evidence-based transdiagnostic intervention in a PHP setting and further targets for intervention and implementation adaptation. Seventeen PHP clinical providers completed a survey about the implementation of the Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP-C/A). Providers completed measures on the UP-C/A's characteristics, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, leadership implementation support, and open-ended questions about the UP-C/A implementation. A mixed methods approach was used to analyze and integrate data. Ratings of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were high. The most influential implementation facilitators were positive views of the innovation characteristics, while the most influential barriers were insufficient access to knowledge and information as well as limited processes for reflecting on implementation. Aspects of intervention design (e.g., low complexity, observability, adaptability) contributed to high levels of acceptability. Barriers to appropriateness and feasibility included perceived deficiencies in leadership and training supports and perceived needs of some intervention recipients not matching the intervention. Key adaptations included translating the UP-C/A, increasing interactive group components, providing additional supervision, and a process for receiving implementation feedback. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Provider perception of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a transdiagnostic intervention in a youth partial hospitalization setting: A mixed methods implementation process evaluation.","authors":"Elizabeth Casline, Lauren Henry, Katharine Reynolds, Kathleen I Díaz, Jessica Hawks, Laura Anthony, Sarah Kennedy","doi":"10.1037/ser0000933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partial hospitalization programs (PHPs) are increasingly relied upon to provide intensive mental health treatment for youth with acute and severely impairing mental health symptoms, yet very few interventions have been adapted to fit this unique delivery context. Transdiagnostic treatments hold promise for addressing the complex clinical presentations and workflow needs of PHP programs, but more work is needed to understand factors that influence successful implementation. We conducted a formative implementation process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing an evidence-based transdiagnostic intervention in a PHP setting and further targets for intervention and implementation adaptation. Seventeen PHP clinical providers completed a survey about the implementation of the Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP-C/A). Providers completed measures on the UP-C/A's characteristics, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, leadership implementation support, and open-ended questions about the UP-C/A implementation. A mixed methods approach was used to analyze and integrate data. Ratings of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were high. The most influential implementation facilitators were positive views of the innovation characteristics, while the most influential barriers were insufficient access to knowledge and information as well as limited processes for reflecting on implementation. Aspects of intervention design (e.g., low complexity, observability, adaptability) contributed to high levels of acceptability. Barriers to appropriateness and feasibility included perceived deficiencies in leadership and training supports and perceived needs of some intervention recipients not matching the intervention. Key adaptations included translating the UP-C/A, increasing interactive group components, providing additional supervision, and a process for receiving implementation feedback. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shilpa R Hampole, Colleen M Becket-Davenport, Shannon E McCaslin-Rodrigo, Jeane O Bosch, Andrea L Jamison, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Timothy J Avery, Katherine M Juhasz, Catherine G Tang, Pearl McGee-Vincent
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) developed evidence-informed mental health mobile applications (MH apps) to supplement treatment and serve as self-care resources for veterans. However, lack of awareness and understanding of how to integrate MH apps into care pose barriers to uptake. The VA Mobile Mental Health Apps Project was conducted from 2019 to 2021 to train and support VA health care staff in integrating VA MH apps into practice using implementation facilitation. Interdisciplinary staff (N = 1,110) from 19 VA sites, led by local site champions, and supported by project Facilitators, participated. The training phase successfully equipped staff with key knowledge and skills for MH app integration (McGee-Vincent et al., 2023), but training is not sufficient for practice change (Schueller & Torous, 2020). The current article summarizes results from a mixed methods evaluation of the preimplementation planning and active implementation phases of the project. Survey data from 3-month posttraining (n = 362) and qualitative interview data (n = 27) assessed within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al., 2022b) were analyzed to highlight facilitators and barriers to implementation. Results showed positive perceptions, meaningful adoption, and expanded reach of MH apps for veterans by staff across VA. Given that the project was well-received and perceived to be sustainable, the adaptability of the innovation and implementation model, and the relatively limited number of perceived barriers, this project may serve as a model for other practice changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
美国退伍军人事务部(VA)开发了基于证据的心理健康移动应用程序(MH应用程序),以补充治疗,并作为退伍军人的自我保健资源。然而,缺乏对如何将健康护理应用程序整合到护理中的认识和理解构成了吸收的障碍。VA移动心理健康应用程序项目于2019年至2021年开展,旨在培训和支持VA卫生保健人员通过促进实施将VA MH应用程序融入实践。来自19个VA站点的跨学科工作人员(N = 1110),由当地站点倡导者领导,并由项目促进者支持。培训阶段成功地为员工提供了MH应用程序集成的关键知识和技能(McGee-Vincent et al., 2023),但培训不足以改变实践(Schueller & Torous, 2020)。本文总结了对项目实施前计划和积极实施阶段的混合方法评价的结果。对培训后3个月的调查数据(n = 362)和在实施研究统一框架(Damschroder等人,2022b)内评估的定性访谈数据(n = 27)进行分析,以突出实施的促进因素和障碍。结果显示,VA员工对退伍军人MH应用程序有积极的看法,有意义的采用,并扩大了其覆盖范围。鉴于该项目受到好评,并被认为是可持续的,创新和实施模式的适应性,以及感知到的障碍数量相对有限,该项目可以作为其他实践变革的典范。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to implementing mental health apps among interdisciplinary staff in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Shilpa R Hampole, Colleen M Becket-Davenport, Shannon E McCaslin-Rodrigo, Jeane O Bosch, Andrea L Jamison, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Timothy J Avery, Katherine M Juhasz, Catherine G Tang, Pearl McGee-Vincent","doi":"10.1037/ser0000934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) developed evidence-informed mental health mobile applications (MH apps) to supplement treatment and serve as self-care resources for veterans. However, lack of awareness and understanding of how to integrate MH apps into care pose barriers to uptake. The VA Mobile Mental Health Apps Project was conducted from 2019 to 2021 to train and support VA health care staff in integrating VA MH apps into practice using implementation facilitation. Interdisciplinary staff (<i>N</i> = 1,110) from 19 VA sites, led by local site champions, and supported by project Facilitators, participated. The training phase successfully equipped staff with key knowledge and skills for MH app integration (McGee-Vincent et al., 2023), but training is not sufficient for practice change (Schueller & Torous, 2020). The current article summarizes results from a mixed methods evaluation of the preimplementation planning and active implementation phases of the project. Survey data from 3-month posttraining (<i>n</i> = 362) and qualitative interview data (<i>n</i> = 27) assessed within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al., 2022b) were analyzed to highlight facilitators and barriers to implementation. Results showed positive perceptions, meaningful adoption, and expanded reach of MH apps for veterans by staff across VA. Given that the project was well-received and perceived to be sustainable, the adaptability of the innovation and implementation model, and the relatively limited number of perceived barriers, this project may serve as a model for other practice changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Today's workplace continually requires organizations to empower employees to go beyond their job description to help maintain a competitive edge in the market. Developing transformational leadership in an organization is one means in which a company can attempt to empower and inspire their employees. However, thus far there are a limited number of tools to assist in the development of transformational leadership. The following exploratory review sought to examine the potential use of an assessment center as a means to develop transformational leadership. The topic was examined by analyzing both the assessment center and transformational leadership literatures. The literatures were obtained via a search on Ebscohost and Google scholar databases. The intersection of the literatures was used to develop a proposed framework for the transformational leadership development center that includes suggested dimensions, exercises, and future approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
今天的工作场所不断要求组织授权员工超越他们的工作职责,以帮助他们在市场上保持竞争优势。在组织中发展变革型领导力是公司可以尝试授权和激励员工的一种手段。然而,到目前为止,有有限的工具,以协助变革型领导的发展。下面的探索性审查试图检查评估中心作为发展变革型领导的一种手段的潜在用途。通过分析评估中心和变革型领导的文献来检验这一主题。通过检索Ebscohost和谷歌学者数据库获得文献。本文利用文献的交叉点,为变革型领导力发展中心制定了一个建议的框架,包括建议的维度、练习和未来的方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The use of assessment centers as a means to develop transformational leadership.","authors":"Antonio Trey Gonzalez","doi":"10.1037/ser0000877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today's workplace continually requires organizations to empower employees to go beyond their job description to help maintain a competitive edge in the market. Developing transformational leadership in an organization is one means in which a company can attempt to empower and inspire their employees. However, thus far there are a limited number of tools to assist in the development of transformational leadership. The following exploratory review sought to examine the potential use of an assessment center as a means to develop transformational leadership. The topic was examined by analyzing both the assessment center and transformational leadership literatures. The literatures were obtained via a search on Ebscohost and Google scholar databases. The intersection of the literatures was used to develop a proposed framework for the transformational leadership development center that includes suggested dimensions, exercises, and future approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam D Bramoweth, Caroline E Hough, Erin M O'Brien, Elizabeth A Klingaman, Cara J Deininger, Christi S Ulmer, Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Jennifer L McCoy, Ada O Youk
Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among veterans and can significantly impact health, function, and quality of life. Brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI), an adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), was developed to help increase access to care outside of specialty settings. However, training providers alone is rarely sufficient, and implementation strategies are needed for successful uptake, adoption, and sustainable delivery of care. The current analysis compares the impact of providing BBTI training alone (BBTI) versus training plus implementation strategies (BBTI + IS) on veteran engagement in BBTI (i.e., reach) in Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics. Providers from four Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers completed BBTI training and then were given access to and support for implementation strategies. Core strategies implemented across all sites included developing an implementation blueprint, organizing implementation and educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, developing tools for quality monitoring, and facilitation. Veteran engagement in BBTI, CBT-I, insomnia diagnoses, and prescription sleep medication was measured using retrospective data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear models. Overall, sites significantly increased veteran engagement in BBTI (reach) from training alone and achieved further engagement with implementation strategies. At the site level, there was variability by phase, with three sites increasing BBTI only with training and one site increasing BBTI with training plus implementation support. These results are promising-increasing access to evidence-based behavioral insomnia care can be accomplished via BBTI training and easily implementable strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
慢性失眠是退伍军人中最常见的健康问题之一,会严重影响健康、功能和生活质量。失眠短期行为治疗(BBTI)是失眠认知行为治疗(CBT-I)的一种改编,旨在帮助增加专业环境外的护理机会。然而,仅靠培训提供者是不够的,需要实施战略来成功地吸收、采用和可持续地提供护理。目前的分析比较了单独提供BBTI培训(BBTI)与培训加实施策略(BBTI + IS)对初级保健心理健康综合诊所退伍军人参与BBTI(即覆盖范围)的影响。来自四个退伍军人事务医疗中心的提供者完成了BBTI培训,然后获得了执行战略的机会和支持。在所有站点实施的核心战略包括制定实施蓝图、组织实施和教育会议、编写和分发教育材料、开发质量监测工具和促进。退伍军人在BBTI、CBT-I、失眠诊断和处方睡眠药物方面的参与使用来自VA公司数据仓库的回顾性数据进行测量。采用广义线性模型进行分析。总体而言,各网站显著提高了退伍军人对BBTI的参与度,不仅限于培训,还进一步提高了实施策略的参与度。在站点层面,不同阶段存在差异,三个站点仅通过培训增加BBTI,一个站点通过培训加实施支持增加BBTI。这些结果是有希望的——通过BBTI培训和易于实施的策略,可以增加对基于证据的行为性失眠护理的获取。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Implementing brief behavioral treatment for insomnia in Department of Veterans Affairs Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics: Reach outcomes from a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial.","authors":"Adam D Bramoweth, Caroline E Hough, Erin M O'Brien, Elizabeth A Klingaman, Cara J Deininger, Christi S Ulmer, Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Jennifer L McCoy, Ada O Youk","doi":"10.1037/ser0000924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among veterans and can significantly impact health, function, and quality of life. Brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI), an adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), was developed to help increase access to care outside of specialty settings. However, training providers alone is rarely sufficient, and implementation strategies are needed for successful uptake, adoption, and sustainable delivery of care. The current analysis compares the impact of providing BBTI training alone (BBTI) versus training plus implementation strategies (BBTI + IS) on veteran engagement in BBTI (i.e., reach) in Primary Care Mental Health Integration clinics. Providers from four Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers completed BBTI training and then were given access to and support for implementation strategies. Core strategies implemented across all sites included developing an implementation blueprint, organizing implementation and educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, developing tools for quality monitoring, and facilitation. Veteran engagement in BBTI, CBT-I, insomnia diagnoses, and prescription sleep medication was measured using retrospective data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear models. Overall, sites significantly increased veteran engagement in BBTI (reach) from training alone and achieved further engagement with implementation strategies. At the site level, there was variability by phase, with three sites increasing BBTI only with training and one site increasing BBTI with training plus implementation support. These results are promising-increasing access to evidence-based behavioral insomnia care can be accomplished via BBTI training and easily implementable strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn A Thomas, William T Hoyt, Simon Goldberg, Maleeha Abbas, Megan Schultz, Michele Hiserodt, Mary Wyman
Suicide occurs at high rates in both military and veteran populations. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide is a widely applied framework incorporating the requisite construct of acquired capability for suicide, which is the ability to engage in suicidal behaviors developed through painful and provocative life experiences. The Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) was developed to assess this construct. Despite substantial literature examining Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in military samples, many versions of ACSS have been used without adequate validation. The goal of this study was to examine the factor structure of the ACSS and derive a version of the ACSS with initial validity for use in military populations. We also examined the stability of acquired capability over time. Data were collected among Wisconsin Army National Guard service members, who were deployed to the Middle East from 2008 to 2010, at three assessment points: before deployment (n = 714), immediately after return from deployment (n = 2,553), and 6-9 months postdeployment (n = 646). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of postdeployment data suggest adoption of a novel, abbreviated 15-item, four-factor version of the ACSS. Analyses provided preliminary support for discriminant and predictive validity. Results also revealed that acquired capability for suicide increases after deployment and remains stable for at least 6-9 months after return from the combat. The four-factor version of the ACSS shows promise as a theory-relevant and empirically supported instrument for research and clinical applications in the military population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Examining the factor structure of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) in a military population: Initial development and validation of a four-factor version of the ACSS.","authors":"Kathryn A Thomas, William T Hoyt, Simon Goldberg, Maleeha Abbas, Megan Schultz, Michele Hiserodt, Mary Wyman","doi":"10.1037/ser0000917","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide occurs at high rates in both military and veteran populations. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide is a widely applied framework incorporating the requisite construct of acquired capability for suicide, which is the ability to engage in suicidal behaviors developed through painful and provocative life experiences. The Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) was developed to assess this construct. Despite substantial literature examining Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in military samples, many versions of ACSS have been used without adequate validation. The goal of this study was to examine the factor structure of the ACSS and derive a version of the ACSS with initial validity for use in military populations. We also examined the stability of acquired capability over time. Data were collected among Wisconsin Army National Guard service members, who were deployed to the Middle East from 2008 to 2010, at three assessment points: before deployment (<i>n</i> = 714), immediately after return from deployment (<i>n</i> = 2,553), and 6-9 months postdeployment (<i>n</i> = 646). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of postdeployment data suggest adoption of a novel, abbreviated 15-item, four-factor version of the ACSS. Analyses provided preliminary support for discriminant and predictive validity. Results also revealed that acquired capability for suicide increases after deployment and remains stable for at least 6-9 months after return from the combat. The four-factor version of the ACSS shows promise as a theory-relevant and empirically supported instrument for research and clinical applications in the military population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}