Psychiatric services最新文献

Objective: Patients' experiences of inpatient psychiatry have received limited empirical scrutiny. The authors examined patients' likelihood of experiencing institutional betrayal (harmful actions or inactions toward patients) at facilities with for-profit, nonprofit, or government ownership; patient-level characteristics associated with experiencing institutional betrayal; associations between betrayal and patients' trust in mental health providers; and associations between betrayal and patients' willingness to engage in care postdischarge.

Methods: Former psychiatric inpatients (N=814 adults) responded to an online survey. Data were collected on patients' demographic characteristics; experiences of institutional betrayal; and the impact of psychiatric hospitalization on patients' trust in providers, willingness to engage in care, and attendance at 30-day follow-up visits. Participants' responses were linked to secondary data on facility ownership type.

Results: Experiencing institutional betrayal was associated with less trust in mental health providers (25-percentage-point increase in reporting less trust, 95% CI=17-32), reduced willingness (by 45 percentage points, 95% CI=39-52) voluntarily undergo hospitalization, reduced willingness (by 30 percentage points, 95% CI=23-37) to report distressing thoughts to mental health providers, and lower probability of reporting attendance at a 30-day follow-up visit (11-percentage-point decrease, 95% CI=5-18). Participants treated at a for-profit facility were significantly more likely (by 14 percentage points) to report experiencing institutional betrayal than were those treated at a nonprofit facility (p=0.01).

Conclusions: Institutional betrayal is one mechanism through which inpatient psychiatric facilities may cause iatrogenic harm, and the potential for betrayal was larger at for-profit facilities. Further research is needed to identify the determinants of institutional betrayal and strategies to support improvement in care quality.

Climate change poses substantial challenges to mental health, with increased frequency of extreme weather events and environmental degradation exacerbating stress, anxiety, trauma, and existential concerns. Digital innovations, particularly artificial intelligence and digital phenotyping, offer promising avenues to mitigate climate-related mental health burdens. The integration of digital tools into climate-related mental health care necessitates careful consideration of issues of access to and adoption of solutions. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness and scalability of digital interventions to address the mental health impacts of climate change through collaborative efforts involving clinicians, environmental health specialists, bioethicists, policy makers, and technology developers.

Objective: Expanded funding to support care across the crisis continuum is intended to improve behavioral health outcomes. A greater understanding of how to effectively implement and integrate local crisis care systems has been identified as a research and policy priority. The aim of this study was to explore provider perceptions of the barriers and facilitators associated with implementing effective behavioral health crisis services.

Methods: The authors conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with personnel from 15 behavioral health crisis care programs across California. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of peer specialists, clinicians, mental health workers, and program leaders. Interview transcripts were analyzed via an inductive approach to thematic analysis. On the basis of patterns identified in the data, initial codes were developed, reviewed, and combined into overarching preliminary themes and subthemes.

Results: Twenty-nine crisis care personnel participated. Facilitators of effective crisis care included an optimal crisis service structure, a client-centered approach, engagement with clients' support systems, and collaboration with community partners to link clients to services and enable safe delivery of crisis care. Barriers at the client, program, and system levels were identified, with solutions proposed for each.

Conclusions: The participants identified features of crisis care that could improve program implementation and effectiveness or could help mitigate identified barriers. As states and local municipalities work to implement an integrated system of care across the crisis care continuum, input from frontline providers can be used to support the development of new programs, refine existing services, and inform future directions for research.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the demand for, supply of, and clinic processes associated with behavioral health care delivery in the Military Health System and to examine the clinic-level factors associated with receipt of a minimally adequate dosage of psychotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective study used administrative behavioral health data from eight military treatment facilities (N=25,433 patients; N=241,028 encounters) that were participating in a larger implementation study of evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Minimally adequate dosage of psychotherapy was defined in two ways: at least three sessions within a 90-day period and at least six sessions within a 90-day period. The authors then used a path model to examine clinic-level factors hypothesized to predict psychotherapy dosage, including care demand, supply, and processes.

Results: Patients had an average of 2.5 psychotherapy appointments per quarter. Wait times for intake, between intake and the first psychotherapy session, and between follow-up sessions all averaged 17 days or longer. Path modeling showed that a higher patient-to-encounter ratio was associated with a longer wait time between follow-up psychotherapy appointments. In turn, a longer wait time between appointments was associated with a lower probability of receiving an adequate dosage of psychotherapy. However, a greater proportion of care delivered in groups was associated with a greater probability of receiving at least six sessions of psychotherapy.

Conclusions: Receipt of a minimally adequate dosage of psychotherapy in the Military Health System is hindered by clinic staffing and workflows that increase wait times between follow-up psychotherapy appointments.

Objective: Wellness has been associated with various general medical and mental health outcomes; however, few empirically supported measures capture the breadth of the wellness construct. The first author had previously developed the Wellness Inventory through an iterative process with key stakeholders to establish face and content validity and examined the psychometric properties of the Wellness Inventory as a tool for assessing wellness across eight dimensions.

Methods: The authors assessed the Wellness Inventory by using data from self-report online surveys in three samples of data collected from two groups of respondents: students and faculty members in a public university and behavioral health providers (N=3,446; 50% White and 43% female). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and data from samples 1 and 2 were used to examine the factor structure and fit of the inventory. Data from sample 3 were used to assess test-retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validity.

Results: Factor analyses yielded a one-factor model comprising 54 items. A revised instrument based on this model revealed good fit to the data, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability and reasonable construct validity.

Conclusions: The Wellness Inventory is a comprehensive and psychometrically valid tool for assessing wellness. The findings support a single dimension of wellness, suggesting wellness as a holistic, general construct. This inventory has implications for research on health promotion and prevention and clinical outcomes in both research and treatment.

Objective: The authors sought to investigate whether utilization of inpatient occupational therapy (OT) was associated with reduced risk for 30-day psychiatric readmission in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of VHA medical record data for veterans who received inpatient psychiatric care from 2015 to 2020 (N=176,889). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to model psychiatric readmission within 30 days of discharge (yes or no) as a function of inpatient psychiatric OT utilization (none, one, two, three, or four or more encounters) and other care utilization (e.g., previous psychiatric hospitalization), as well as clinical (e.g., primary diagnosis), sociodemographic (e.g., race-ethnicity), and facility (e.g., complexity) characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of findings (e.g., stratification by discharge disposition).

Results: Relatively few veterans received inpatient psychiatric OT (26.2%), and 8.4% were readmitted within 30 days. Compared with veterans who did not receive inpatient psychiatric OT, those with one (OR=0.76), two (OR=0.64), three (OR=0.67), or four or more encounters (OR=0.64) were significantly (p<0.001) less likely to be readmitted within 30 days. These findings were consistent across all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Veterans who received inpatient OT services were less likely to experience psychiatric readmission. A clear dose-response relationship between inpatient psychiatric OT and readmission risk was not identified. These findings suggest that OT services may facilitate high-value inpatient psychiatric care in the VHA by preventing readmissions that stymie recovery and incur high costs. Future research may establish the causality of this relationship, informing policy regarding increased access to inpatient psychiatric OT.

Research shows that guests experience peer-run respites as empowering and safe places where they feel more seen, heard, and respected than they do in conventional settings. This column describes the successful and unique processes of peer-run respites that support guests in emotional crisis and facilitate healing. In a discussion informed by their experiences and the literature, the authors examine how peer-run respites differ from conventional psychiatric crisis response services in their basic philosophy: how emotional crisis is understood, the goal of crisis response, how trauma is viewed, the importance of self-determination, power dynamics, and relationality.

Objective: Discriminatory practices in mental health care undermine the right to health of marginalized service users. Intersectional approaches enable consideration of multiple forms of discrimination that occur simultaneously and remain invisible in single-axis analyses. The authors reviewed intersectionality-informed qualitative literature on discriminatory practices in mental health care to better understand the experiences of marginalized service users and their evaluation and navigation of mental health care.

Methods: The authors searched EBSCO, PubMed, MEDLINE, and JSTOR for studies published January 1, 1989-December 14, 2022. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies were eligible if they used an intersectional approach to examine discrimination (experiences, mechanisms, and coping strategies) in mental health care settings from the perspective of service users and providers. A qualitative evidence synthesis with thematic analysis was performed.

Results: Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. These studies represented the experiences of 383 service users and 114 providers. Most studies considered the intersections of mental illness with race, sexual and gender diversity, or both and were performed in the United States or Canada. Four themes were identified: the relevance of social identity in mental health care settings, knowledge-related concerns in mental health care, microaggressions in clinical practice, and service users' responses to discriminatory practices.

Conclusions: Discriminatory practices in mental health care lead to specific barriers to care for multiply marginalized service users. Universities and hospitals may improve care by building competencies in recognizing and preventing discrimination through institutionalized training.

Objective: Counselor assessment of suicide risk is one key component of crisis counseling, and standards require risk assessment in every crisis counseling conversation. Efforts to increase risk assessment frequency are limited by quality improvement tools that rely on human evaluation of conversations, which is labor intensive, slow, and impossible to scale. Advances in machine learning (ML) have made possible the development of tools that can automatically and immediately detect the presence of risk assessment in crisis counseling conversations.

Methods: To train models, a coding team labeled every statement in 476 crisis counseling calls (193,257 statements) for a core element of risk assessment. The authors then fine-tuned a transformer-based ML model with the labeled data, utilizing separate training, validation, and test data sets.

Results: Generally, the evaluated ML model was highly consistent with human raters. For detecting any risk assessment, ML model agreement with human ratings was 98% of human interrater agreement. Across specific labels, average F1 (the harmonic mean of precision and recall) was 0.86 at the call level and 0.66 at the statement level and often varied as a result of a low base rate for some risk labels.

Conclusions: ML models can reliably detect the presence of suicide risk assessment in crisis counseling conversations, presenting an opportunity to scale quality improvement efforts.