Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-12-18DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04535-w
Sarah Interligator, Antoine Le Bozec, Guillaume Cluzel, Matthieu Devilder, Jessica Ghaouche, Daphne Guenoun, Albane Fleury, Florian Petit Lemaire, Robert-Yves Carlier, Catarina Valente, Maud Creze
Objective: To describe the frequency of MR and CT features of infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) and assess its extent and complications MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ISI who were evaluated between 2008 and 2021 in a single center. Two radiologists reviewed MRI and CT images to determine the anatomical distribution (unilateral/bilateral, iliac/sacral bone, proximal/middle/distal), severity (bone marrow edema [BME]/periostitis/erosions), concurrent infection (vertebral/nonvertebral), and complications (abscess/probable adjacent osteomyelitis/cavitation/devitalized areas/sequestrum/pelvic venous thrombosis) of ISI. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed. Correlation analysis evaluated the effect of the causative microorganism on severity. Two human bodies were dissected to outline possible ways that ISI can spread.
Results: Forty patients with ISI (40 years ± 22; 26 women) were evaluated. Ten patients had bilateral ISI. Concurrent vertebral infection was associated in 15% of cases. Reproducibility of sacral BME, periostitis, and reactive locoregional abnormalities was perfect (κ = 1). Reproducibility was low for erosion count (κ = 0.52[0.52-0.82]) and periarticular osteopenia (κ = 0.50[0.18-0.82]). Inflammatory changes were BME (42/42 joints), muscle edema (38/42), and severe periostitis along the ilium (33/37). Destructive structural changes occurred with confluent erosions (iliac, 20/48; sacral, 13/48), sequestrum (20/48), and cavitation (12/48). Complications occurred in 75% of cases, including periarticular abscesses (n = 30/47), probable adjacent osteomyelitis (n = 16/37), and pelvic thrombophlebitis (n = 3). Tuberculous ISI (6/40) correlated with sclerosis (rs = 0.45[0.16; 0.67]; p < 10-2) and bone devitalization (rs = 0.38[0.16; 0.67]; p = .02). The anatomical study highlighted the shared venous vascularization of sacroiliac joints, pelvic organs, and mobile spine.
Conclusion: Complications of ISI are frequent, including abscesses, adjacent osteomyelitis, and periostitis. ISI had bilateral involvement nonrarely and is commonly associated with another spinal infection.
{"title":"Infectious sacroiliitis: MRI- and CT-based assessment of disease extent, complications, and anatomic correlation.","authors":"Sarah Interligator, Antoine Le Bozec, Guillaume Cluzel, Matthieu Devilder, Jessica Ghaouche, Daphne Guenoun, Albane Fleury, Florian Petit Lemaire, Robert-Yves Carlier, Catarina Valente, Maud Creze","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04535-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04535-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the frequency of MR and CT features of infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) and assess its extent and complications MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ISI who were evaluated between 2008 and 2021 in a single center. Two radiologists reviewed MRI and CT images to determine the anatomical distribution (unilateral/bilateral, iliac/sacral bone, proximal/middle/distal), severity (bone marrow edema [BME]/periostitis/erosions), concurrent infection (vertebral/nonvertebral), and complications (abscess/probable adjacent osteomyelitis/cavitation/devitalized areas/sequestrum/pelvic venous thrombosis) of ISI. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed. Correlation analysis evaluated the effect of the causative microorganism on severity. Two human bodies were dissected to outline possible ways that ISI can spread.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients with ISI (40 years ± 22; 26 women) were evaluated. Ten patients had bilateral ISI. Concurrent vertebral infection was associated in 15% of cases. Reproducibility of sacral BME, periostitis, and reactive locoregional abnormalities was perfect (κ = 1). Reproducibility was low for erosion count (κ = 0.52[0.52-0.82]) and periarticular osteopenia (κ = 0.50[0.18-0.82]). Inflammatory changes were BME (42/42 joints), muscle edema (38/42), and severe periostitis along the ilium (33/37). Destructive structural changes occurred with confluent erosions (iliac, 20/48; sacral, 13/48), sequestrum (20/48), and cavitation (12/48). Complications occurred in 75% of cases, including periarticular abscesses (n = 30/47), probable adjacent osteomyelitis (n = 16/37), and pelvic thrombophlebitis (n = 3). Tuberculous ISI (6/40) correlated with sclerosis (rs = 0.45[0.16; 0.67]; p < 10<sup>-2</sup>) and bone devitalization (rs = 0.38[0.16; 0.67]; p = .02). The anatomical study highlighted the shared venous vascularization of sacroiliac joints, pelvic organs, and mobile spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complications of ISI are frequent, including abscesses, adjacent osteomyelitis, and periostitis. ISI had bilateral involvement nonrarely and is commonly associated with another spinal infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2247-2262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138809412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-01-16DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04558-3
Olga Laur, Alison Schonberger, Drew Gunio, Shlomo Minkowitz, Gayle Salama, Christopher J Burke, Roger J Bartolotta
This article comprehensively reviews current imaging concepts in spinal infection with primary focus on infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) as well as the less common entity of facet joint septic arthritis (FSA). This review encompasses the multimodality imaging appearances (radiographs, CT, MRI, and nuclear imaging) of spinal infection-both at initial presentation and during treatment-to aid the radiologist in guiding diagnosis and successful management. We discuss the pathophysiology of spinal infection in various patient populations (including the non-instrumented and postoperative spine) as well as the role of imaging-guided biopsy. We also highlight several non-infectious entities that can mimic IS (both clinically and radiologically) that should be considered during image interpretation to avoid misdiagnosis. These potential mimics include the following: Modic type 1 degenerative changes, acute Schmorl's node, neuropathic spondyloarthropathy, radiation osteitis, and inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (SAPHO syndrome).
本文全面回顾了当前脊柱感染的影像学概念,主要关注感染性脊盘炎(IS)以及较少见的面关节化脓性关节炎(FSA)。这篇综述涵盖了脊柱感染的多模态影像学表现(X 光片、CT、MRI 和核素成像),包括最初出现时和治疗过程中的表现,以帮助放射科医生指导诊断和成功治疗。我们将讨论脊柱感染在不同患者群体中的病理生理学(包括无器械和术后脊柱)以及影像引导活检的作用。我们还强调了几种可模拟 IS 的非感染性实体(在临床和放射学上),在图像解读时应加以考虑,以避免误诊。这些潜在的假象包括莫迪奇 1 型退行性病变、急性施莫尔结节、神经病理性脊柱关节病、放射性骨炎和炎性脊柱关节病(SAPHO 综合征)。
{"title":"Imaging assessment of spine infection.","authors":"Olga Laur, Alison Schonberger, Drew Gunio, Shlomo Minkowitz, Gayle Salama, Christopher J Burke, Roger J Bartolotta","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04558-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04558-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article comprehensively reviews current imaging concepts in spinal infection with primary focus on infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) as well as the less common entity of facet joint septic arthritis (FSA). This review encompasses the multimodality imaging appearances (radiographs, CT, MRI, and nuclear imaging) of spinal infection-both at initial presentation and during treatment-to aid the radiologist in guiding diagnosis and successful management. We discuss the pathophysiology of spinal infection in various patient populations (including the non-instrumented and postoperative spine) as well as the role of imaging-guided biopsy. We also highlight several non-infectious entities that can mimic IS (both clinically and radiologically) that should be considered during image interpretation to avoid misdiagnosis. These potential mimics include the following: Modic type 1 degenerative changes, acute Schmorl's node, neuropathic spondyloarthropathy, radiation osteitis, and inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (SAPHO syndrome).</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2067-2079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Musculoskeletal hydatid disease is rare and can be located anywhere but most commonly the bone and muscles of the spine, pelvis, then the lower limbs. Imaging is essential for its diagnosis, performing the pre-therapeutic assessment, guiding possible percutaneous treatments, and providing post-therapeutic follow-up. Musculoskeletal hydatidosis can take several forms that may suggest other infections and tumors or pseudotumors. MRI and CT are superior for its diagnosis but ultrasound and radiography remain the most accessible examinations in developing countries where this parasitosis is endemic. In this review, we provide an overview of this disease and describe its different imaging patterns in soft tissue and bone involvement that should be sought to support the diagnosis.
{"title":"The multifaceted musculoskeletal hydatid disease.","authors":"Amine Ammar, Hend Riahi, Mohamed Chaabouni, Nadia Venturelli, Valentin Renault, Benjamen Dray, Dominique Safa, Leila Abid, Mouna Chelli Bouaziz, Robert-Yves Carlier","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04644-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-024-04644-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Musculoskeletal hydatid disease is rare and can be located anywhere but most commonly the bone and muscles of the spine, pelvis, then the lower limbs. Imaging is essential for its diagnosis, performing the pre-therapeutic assessment, guiding possible percutaneous treatments, and providing post-therapeutic follow-up. Musculoskeletal hydatidosis can take several forms that may suggest other infections and tumors or pseudotumors. MRI and CT are superior for its diagnosis but ultrasound and radiography remain the most accessible examinations in developing countries where this parasitosis is endemic. In this review, we provide an overview of this disease and describe its different imaging patterns in soft tissue and bone involvement that should be sought to support the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2181-2194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140132470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-11-25DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04518-x
Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Carolina Díaz-Angulo, Cristina Vilanova, Ariadna Barceló, Joaquim Barceló, Antonio Luna, Joan C Vilanova
MRI evaluation of the diabetic foot is still a challenge not only from an interpretative but also from a technical point of view. The incorporation of advanced sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI into standard protocols for diabetic foot assessment could aid radiologists in differentiating between neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot's foot) and osteomyelitis. This distinction is crucial as both conditions can coexist in diabetic patients, and they require markedly different clinical management and have distinct prognoses. Over the past decade, several studies have explored the effectiveness of DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in distinguishing between septic and reactive bone marrow, as well as soft tissue involvement in diabetic patients, yielding promising results. DWI, without the need for exogenous contrast, can provide insights into the cellularity of bone marrow and soft tissues. DCE-MRI allows for a more precise evaluation of soft tissue and bone marrow perfusion compared to conventional post-gadolinium imaging. The data obtained from these sequences will complement the traditional MRI approach in assessing the diabetic foot. The objective of this review is to familiarize readers with the fundamental concepts of DWI and DCE-MRI, including technical adjustments and practical tips for image interpretation in diabetic foot cases.
{"title":"How to do and evaluate DWI and DCE-MRI sequences for diabetic foot assessment.","authors":"Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Carolina Díaz-Angulo, Cristina Vilanova, Ariadna Barceló, Joaquim Barceló, Antonio Luna, Joan C Vilanova","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04518-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04518-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MRI evaluation of the diabetic foot is still a challenge not only from an interpretative but also from a technical point of view. The incorporation of advanced sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI into standard protocols for diabetic foot assessment could aid radiologists in differentiating between neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot's foot) and osteomyelitis. This distinction is crucial as both conditions can coexist in diabetic patients, and they require markedly different clinical management and have distinct prognoses. Over the past decade, several studies have explored the effectiveness of DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in distinguishing between septic and reactive bone marrow, as well as soft tissue involvement in diabetic patients, yielding promising results. DWI, without the need for exogenous contrast, can provide insights into the cellularity of bone marrow and soft tissues. DCE-MRI allows for a more precise evaluation of soft tissue and bone marrow perfusion compared to conventional post-gadolinium imaging. The data obtained from these sequences will complement the traditional MRI approach in assessing the diabetic foot. The objective of this review is to familiarize readers with the fundamental concepts of DWI and DCE-MRI, including technical adjustments and practical tips for image interpretation in diabetic foot cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1979-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138435053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-03DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04694-4
Devpriyo Pal, Shambo Guha Roy, Rajshree Singh, Mohammad Reza Hayeri
Skin and soft tissues are among the most common sites of infections. Infections can involve the superficial epidermis to deep muscles and bones. Most infections spread through contiguous structures, although hematogenous spread can occur in the setting of an immunocompromised state and with atypical infections. While clinical diagnosis of infections is possible, it often lacks specificity, necessitating the use of imaging for confirmation. Cross-sectional imaging with US, CT, and MRI is frequently performed not just for diagnosis, but to delineate the extent of infection and to aid in management. Nonetheless, the imaging features have considerable overlap, and as such, it is essential to integrate imaging features with clinical features for managing soft tissue infections. Radiologists must be aware of the imaging features of different infections and their mimics, as well as the pros and cons of each imaging technique to properly use them for appropriate clinical situations. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence-based features of key soft tissue infections.
{"title":"Imaging features of soft-tissue infections.","authors":"Devpriyo Pal, Shambo Guha Roy, Rajshree Singh, Mohammad Reza Hayeri","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04694-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-024-04694-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin and soft tissues are among the most common sites of infections. Infections can involve the superficial epidermis to deep muscles and bones. Most infections spread through contiguous structures, although hematogenous spread can occur in the setting of an immunocompromised state and with atypical infections. While clinical diagnosis of infections is possible, it often lacks specificity, necessitating the use of imaging for confirmation. Cross-sectional imaging with US, CT, and MRI is frequently performed not just for diagnosis, but to delineate the extent of infection and to aid in management. Nonetheless, the imaging features have considerable overlap, and as such, it is essential to integrate imaging features with clinical features for managing soft tissue infections. Radiologists must be aware of the imaging features of different infections and their mimics, as well as the pros and cons of each imaging technique to properly use them for appropriate clinical situations. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence-based features of key soft tissue infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2211-2226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-09-25DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04442-0
Caleb M Yeung, Nicola Fabbri
A 76-year-old male diagnosed with sarcoidosis presented with atraumatic left anterior knee pain. Initial imaging of the left lower extremity revealed an eccentrically-based lytic lesion in the mid-distal femur with cortical erosion and an additional lytic lesion in the proximal tibia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an aggressive lesion in the proximal tibia with surrounding marrow edema, cortical breach, and erosion into the distal patellar tendon. Given concern for metastatic bone lesions, a18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan (FDG PET/CT) was performed which demonstrated concordant hypermetabolic lytic lesions at the left mid-distal femur and the left proximal tibia, as well as hypermetabolic diffuse lymphadenopathy. The patient was presumed to have metastatic lung cancer based on the presence of lung nodules. Due to concern for impending pathologic fracture, the patient underwent open biopsy with a plan for prophylactic fixation of both lesions. Intra-operatively, however, both lesions were found to contain pus, from which cultures ultimately grew Cryptococcus neoformans. This is a case of disseminated skeletal cryptococcosis masquerading as metastatic cancer in a patient without classic risk factors for disseminated cryptococcosis (defined as extrapulmonary evidence of infection). Classically, disseminated cryptococcosis is thought to occur in severely immunocompromised patients, such as those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or organ transplant recipients. This case highlights the need to maintain a high index of suspicion in patients with underlying immunocompromising conditions, including less common conditions such as sarcoid, who present with bony lesions. This case report then discusses the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of disseminated skeletal cryptococcosis.
{"title":"Disseminated Cryptococcus infection presenting as lytic skeletal lesions suggesting bony metastatic disease.","authors":"Caleb M Yeung, Nicola Fabbri","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04442-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04442-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 76-year-old male diagnosed with sarcoidosis presented with atraumatic left anterior knee pain. Initial imaging of the left lower extremity revealed an eccentrically-based lytic lesion in the mid-distal femur with cortical erosion and an additional lytic lesion in the proximal tibia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an aggressive lesion in the proximal tibia with surrounding marrow edema, cortical breach, and erosion into the distal patellar tendon. Given concern for metastatic bone lesions, a18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan (FDG PET/CT) was performed which demonstrated concordant hypermetabolic lytic lesions at the left mid-distal femur and the left proximal tibia, as well as hypermetabolic diffuse lymphadenopathy. The patient was presumed to have metastatic lung cancer based on the presence of lung nodules. Due to concern for impending pathologic fracture, the patient underwent open biopsy with a plan for prophylactic fixation of both lesions. Intra-operatively, however, both lesions were found to contain pus, from which cultures ultimately grew Cryptococcus neoformans. This is a case of disseminated skeletal cryptococcosis masquerading as metastatic cancer in a patient without classic risk factors for disseminated cryptococcosis (defined as extrapulmonary evidence of infection). Classically, disseminated cryptococcosis is thought to occur in severely immunocompromised patients, such as those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or organ transplant recipients. This case highlights the need to maintain a high index of suspicion in patients with underlying immunocompromising conditions, including less common conditions such as sarcoid, who present with bony lesions. This case report then discusses the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of disseminated skeletal cryptococcosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2297-2305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-10-24DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04483-5
Sara E Sacher, Matthew F Koff, Ek T Tan, Alissa Burge, Hollis G Potter
Identification and diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are challenging, requiring a multi-disciplinary approach involving clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. MRI is advantageous to alternative imaging techniques due to superior soft tissue contrast and absence of ionizing radiation. However, the presence of metallic implants can cause signal loss and artifacts. Metal artifact suppression (MARS) MRI techniques have been developed that mitigate metal artifacts and improve periprosthetic soft tissue visualization. This paper provides a review of the various MARS MRI techniques, their clinical applicability and accuracy in PJI diagnosis and evaluation, and current challenges and future perspectives.
{"title":"The role of advanced metal artifact reduction MRI in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.","authors":"Sara E Sacher, Matthew F Koff, Ek T Tan, Alissa Burge, Hollis G Potter","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04483-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04483-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification and diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are challenging, requiring a multi-disciplinary approach involving clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. MRI is advantageous to alternative imaging techniques due to superior soft tissue contrast and absence of ionizing radiation. However, the presence of metallic implants can cause signal loss and artifacts. Metal artifact suppression (MARS) MRI techniques have been developed that mitigate metal artifacts and improve periprosthetic soft tissue visualization. This paper provides a review of the various MARS MRI techniques, their clinical applicability and accuracy in PJI diagnosis and evaluation, and current challenges and future perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1969-1978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11039568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50158735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-01-19DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04596-5
John S Symanski, Joshua Arnold, Mary E Buchanan, Ritika Punathil, Michael J Tuite, Andrew B Ross
Objective: Evaluate the microbial yield and factors predicting culture positivity for image-guided arthrocentesis of suspected septic sternoclavicular (SC) arthritis.
Materials and methods: An electronic health record search identified image-guided SC joint aspirations for suspected septic arthritis. Data was extracted by retrospective chart review including patient demographics, procedure characteristics, pre-procedure lab testing, joint culture results, final SC joint diagnoses and any effect of positive synovial cultures on subsequent antibiotic therapy. Factors associated with positive joint fluid cultures were assessed using a Chi-squared test for categorical predictors and logistic regression for continuous predictors.
Results: A total of 31 SC arthrocenteses met inclusion criteria with most (81%) performed using ultrasound guidance. Synovial fluid was successfully aspirated in 19/31 (61%) of cases, and in all other cases lavage fluid was successfully obtained. Synovial cultures were positive in 9/31 (29%) of cases. A final diagnosis of septic arthritis was assigned to 20/31 cases (65%) in which 9/20 (45%) had positive synovial cultures. There was no statistically significant association between synovial culture positivity and risk factors for septic arthritis, positive blood cultures, pre-aspiration antibiotics and whether synovial fluid or lavage fluid was cultured. Serum white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) demonstrated statistically significant positive correlation with positive synovial cultures.
Conclusion: Arthrocentesis is effective for microbial speciation in SC septic arthritis, and diagnostic yield may be increased with lavage when encountering a dry tap. Normal serum WBC and ESR values indicate an extremely low likelihood of positive synovial cultures.
{"title":"Arthrocentesis of suspected septic sternoclavicular arthritis: microbial yield and predictors of culture positivity.","authors":"John S Symanski, Joshua Arnold, Mary E Buchanan, Ritika Punathil, Michael J Tuite, Andrew B Ross","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04596-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-024-04596-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the microbial yield and factors predicting culture positivity for image-guided arthrocentesis of suspected septic sternoclavicular (SC) arthritis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic health record search identified image-guided SC joint aspirations for suspected septic arthritis. Data was extracted by retrospective chart review including patient demographics, procedure characteristics, pre-procedure lab testing, joint culture results, final SC joint diagnoses and any effect of positive synovial cultures on subsequent antibiotic therapy. Factors associated with positive joint fluid cultures were assessed using a Chi-squared test for categorical predictors and logistic regression for continuous predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 SC arthrocenteses met inclusion criteria with most (81%) performed using ultrasound guidance. Synovial fluid was successfully aspirated in 19/31 (61%) of cases, and in all other cases lavage fluid was successfully obtained. Synovial cultures were positive in 9/31 (29%) of cases. A final diagnosis of septic arthritis was assigned to 20/31 cases (65%) in which 9/20 (45%) had positive synovial cultures. There was no statistically significant association between synovial culture positivity and risk factors for septic arthritis, positive blood cultures, pre-aspiration antibiotics and whether synovial fluid or lavage fluid was cultured. Serum white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) demonstrated statistically significant positive correlation with positive synovial cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthrocentesis is effective for microbial speciation in SC septic arthritis, and diagnostic yield may be increased with lavage when encountering a dry tap. Normal serum WBC and ESR values indicate an extremely low likelihood of positive synovial cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2263-2269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139492003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-22DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04657-9
Bashiar Thejeel, Zachary Coles, Qian Li, Joesph T Nguyen, Alberto V Carli, Theodore T Miller
Objective: To determine if knee arthroplasty without sonographically visible effusion needs to undergo lavage to rule out infection.
Methods: Patients were accrued by a retrospective search of a longitudinally maintained radiology database looking for patients referred for ultrasound guided aspiration of suspected TKA infection. Clinical presentations, laboratory tests, intraoperative findings, and follow-up were reviewed.
Results: Four hundred sixty-nine patients were included (mean age of 67 years (range, 36-91)) including 251 females. Four hundred three patients had effusions, of which 57 were infected based on ultrasound-guided and surgical aspirates. Sixty-four patients lacked effusions, of which 47 underwent lavage at the clinicians' request, with 6/47 infected. Nineteen patients without effusion were not lavaged at the clinicians' request due to low suspicion, and none were infected. Patients with positive lavage cultures all had clinical risk factors. Infection rates were significantly higher in patients with joint effusion and clinical suspicion for infection compared to absent joint effusion and absent clinical suspicion. A significantly higher proportion of patients with hyperemia or moderate-severe synovial thickening on ultrasound were symptomatic and had joint effusion and positive joint cultures. Aspiration of native fluid had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity while lavage had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 100%. Negative predictive value for native aspirates was 94% compared to 86% for lavage.
Conclusion: A TKA with low clinical suspicion of infection does not need to undergo lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible effusion.
{"title":"When to lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible joint effusion in painful total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective longitudinal study.","authors":"Bashiar Thejeel, Zachary Coles, Qian Li, Joesph T Nguyen, Alberto V Carli, Theodore T Miller","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04657-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-024-04657-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if knee arthroplasty without sonographically visible effusion needs to undergo lavage to rule out infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were accrued by a retrospective search of a longitudinally maintained radiology database looking for patients referred for ultrasound guided aspiration of suspected TKA infection. Clinical presentations, laboratory tests, intraoperative findings, and follow-up were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred sixty-nine patients were included (mean age of 67 years (range, 36-91)) including 251 females. Four hundred three patients had effusions, of which 57 were infected based on ultrasound-guided and surgical aspirates. Sixty-four patients lacked effusions, of which 47 underwent lavage at the clinicians' request, with 6/47 infected. Nineteen patients without effusion were not lavaged at the clinicians' request due to low suspicion, and none were infected. Patients with positive lavage cultures all had clinical risk factors. Infection rates were significantly higher in patients with joint effusion and clinical suspicion for infection compared to absent joint effusion and absent clinical suspicion. A significantly higher proportion of patients with hyperemia or moderate-severe synovial thickening on ultrasound were symptomatic and had joint effusion and positive joint cultures. Aspiration of native fluid had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity while lavage had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 100%. Negative predictive value for native aspirates was 94% compared to 86% for lavage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A TKA with low clinical suspicion of infection does not need to undergo lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible effusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2279-2284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140185516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-12-20DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04549-4
Lucas N M da Silva, Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho, Júlio Brandão Guimarães
During the COVID-19 pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected millions of people worldwide, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) being the most common severe condition of pulmonary involvement. Despite its involvement in the lungs, SARS-CoV-2 causes multiple extrapulmonary manifestations, including manifestations in the musculoskeletal system. Several cases involving bone, joint, muscle, neurovascular and soft tissues were reported shortly after pandemic onset. Even after the acute infection has resolved, many patients experience persistent symptoms and a decrease in quality of life, a condition known as post-COVID syndrome or long COVID. COVID-19 vaccines have been widely available since December 2020, preventing millions of deaths during the pandemic. However, adverse reactions, including those involving the musculoskeletal system, have been reported in the literature. Therefore, the primary goal of this article is to review the main imaging findings of SARS-CoV-2 involvement in the musculoskeletal system, including acute, subacute, chronic and postvaccination manifestations.
{"title":"Musculoskeletal manifestations of COVID-19.","authors":"Lucas N M da Silva, Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho, Júlio Brandão Guimarães","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04549-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00256-023-04549-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected millions of people worldwide, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) being the most common severe condition of pulmonary involvement. Despite its involvement in the lungs, SARS-CoV-2 causes multiple extrapulmonary manifestations, including manifestations in the musculoskeletal system. Several cases involving bone, joint, muscle, neurovascular and soft tissues were reported shortly after pandemic onset. Even after the acute infection has resolved, many patients experience persistent symptoms and a decrease in quality of life, a condition known as post-COVID syndrome or long COVID. COVID-19 vaccines have been widely available since December 2020, preventing millions of deaths during the pandemic. However, adverse reactions, including those involving the musculoskeletal system, have been reported in the literature. Therefore, the primary goal of this article is to review the main imaging findings of SARS-CoV-2 involvement in the musculoskeletal system, including acute, subacute, chronic and postvaccination manifestations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2009-2022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138809321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}