Pub Date : 2011-04-11DOI: 10.7146/fof.v50i2.132879
Thomas Holme
Dette er et online særnummer. Knud Jeppesen (1892-1974) blev i sin lange karriere regnet blandt det 20. århundredes mest anerkendte og respekterede musikvidenskabsmænd, og han fik som sådan en varig international betydning som hidtil ingen anden dansk musikforsker. Disputatsen, Palestrinastil med særlig Henblik paa Dissonansbehandlingen (1923), var banebrydende og gjorde – sammen med en lang række derpå følgende studier – ham til en af sin tids førende autoriteter inden for renæssanceperiodens musik. Hans lærebog, Kontrapunkt (Vokalpolyfoni) (1930), er oversat til ni sprog og må formodentlig anses som det 20. århundredes mest udbredte lærebog i denne periodes vokale satsteknik. Ud over en stor videnskabelig produktion og betydelig editionsvirksomhed fungerede Jeppesen i næsten et kvart århundrede (1931-53) også som hovedredaktør af verdens på det tidspunkt førende musikvidenskabelige tidsskrift, Acta Musicologica. Professionelt virkede Jeppesen som organist ved Skt. Stefans Kirke (1917-32) og Holmens Kirke (1932-46) i København, som lærer ved Det Kgl. Danske Musikkonservatorium (1920-1947) og endelig i perioden 1946-1957 som den første professor i musikvidenskab ved Aarhus Universitet. Jeppesen, som var elev af blandt andre Thomas Laub og Carl Nielsen, udfoldede tillige igennem det meste af sit liv en omfattende kompositorisk virksomhed, blev tildelt Det Anckerske Legat (1946), vandt adskillige komponistkonkurrencer og fik både opførtog publiceret en stor del af sin produktion. Den arkivalske arv efter Knud Jeppesen er omfattende. I store træk er hans kompositionsmanuskripter bevaret i Knud Jeppesens Arkiv (Det Kongelige Bibliotek, København),1 hans videnskabelige papirer og mikrofilm i Knud Jeppesens Samling (Statsbiblioteket,Århus),2 mens hans videnskabelige korrespondance findes på såvel danske biblioteker – især Det Kongelige Bibliotek og Statsbiblioteket – som i udenlandske samlinger.Desuden eksisterer en del arkivmateriale fortsat i privateje.Nærværende Knud Jeppesen Katalog, som er en del af et større projekt om Knud Jeppesen, registrerer i bred forstand – og med forskellige be-/afgrænsninger – Jeppesens ‘samlede værker’ inden for følgende kategorier:3B. Skriftlige arbejderC. KompositionerD. DiskografiE. EditionerI Introduktionen (s. 9-21) redegøres detaljeret for hver enkelt fortegnelses indhold, omfang, ordning, referencesystem, mm.En stor del af det for kataloget tilgrundliggende arbejde er blevet udført på basis af en generøs bevilling fra Lundbeckfonden, som hermed takkes hjerteligt. En uforbeholden tak rettes tilsvarende til de mange personer, som igennem årene har været til stor og helt uvurderlig hjælp, heriblandt navnlig Anne Ørbæk Jensen og Claus Røllum-Larsen, Det Kongelige Bibliotek, Jette Bohn, Æstetikbiblioteket (Aarhus Universitet), personalet i Musiksektionen på Statsbiblioteket, samt Hans Mathiasen. En særlig tak rettes til Lotte og Kristian Jeppesen, som beredvilligt har stillet værdifuldt, privat arkivmateriale til rådi
{"title":"Knud Jeppesen Katalog","authors":"Thomas Holme","doi":"10.7146/fof.v50i2.132879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v50i2.132879","url":null,"abstract":"Dette er et online særnummer. Knud Jeppesen (1892-1974) blev i sin lange karriere regnet blandt det 20. århundredes mest anerkendte og respekterede musikvidenskabsmænd, og han fik som sådan en varig international betydning som hidtil ingen anden dansk musikforsker. Disputatsen, Palestrinastil med særlig Henblik paa Dissonansbehandlingen (1923), var banebrydende og gjorde – sammen med en lang række derpå følgende studier – ham til en af sin tids førende autoriteter inden for renæssanceperiodens musik. Hans lærebog, Kontrapunkt (Vokalpolyfoni) (1930), er oversat til ni sprog og må formodentlig anses som det 20. århundredes mest udbredte lærebog i denne periodes vokale satsteknik. Ud over en stor videnskabelig produktion og betydelig editionsvirksomhed fungerede Jeppesen i næsten et kvart århundrede (1931-53) også som hovedredaktør af verdens på det tidspunkt førende musikvidenskabelige tidsskrift, Acta Musicologica.\u0000Professionelt virkede Jeppesen som organist ved Skt. Stefans Kirke (1917-32) og Holmens Kirke (1932-46) i København, som lærer ved Det Kgl. Danske Musikkonservatorium (1920-1947) og endelig i perioden 1946-1957 som den første professor i musikvidenskab ved Aarhus Universitet.\u0000Jeppesen, som var elev af blandt andre Thomas Laub og Carl Nielsen, udfoldede tillige igennem det meste af sit liv en omfattende kompositorisk virksomhed, blev tildelt Det Anckerske Legat (1946), vandt adskillige komponistkonkurrencer og fik både opførtog publiceret en stor del af sin produktion.\u0000Den arkivalske arv efter Knud Jeppesen er omfattende. I store træk er hans kompositionsmanuskripter bevaret i Knud Jeppesens Arkiv (Det Kongelige Bibliotek, København),1 hans videnskabelige papirer og mikrofilm i Knud Jeppesens Samling (Statsbiblioteket,Århus),2 mens hans videnskabelige korrespondance findes på såvel danske biblioteker – især Det Kongelige Bibliotek og Statsbiblioteket – som i udenlandske samlinger.Desuden eksisterer en del arkivmateriale fortsat i privateje.Nærværende Knud Jeppesen Katalog, som er en del af et større projekt om Knud Jeppesen, registrerer i bred forstand – og med forskellige be-/afgrænsninger – Jeppesens ‘samlede værker’ inden for følgende kategorier:3B. Skriftlige arbejderC. KompositionerD. DiskografiE. EditionerI Introduktionen (s. 9-21) redegøres detaljeret for hver enkelt fortegnelses indhold, omfang, ordning, referencesystem, mm.En stor del af det for kataloget tilgrundliggende arbejde er blevet udført på basis af en generøs bevilling fra Lundbeckfonden, som hermed takkes hjerteligt. En uforbeholden tak rettes tilsvarende til de mange personer, som igennem årene har været til stor og helt uvurderlig hjælp, heriblandt navnlig Anne Ørbæk Jensen og Claus Røllum-Larsen, Det Kongelige Bibliotek, Jette Bohn, Æstetikbiblioteket (Aarhus Universitet), personalet i Musiksektionen på Statsbiblioteket, samt Hans Mathiasen. En særlig tak rettes til Lotte og Kristian Jeppesen, som beredvilligt har stillet værdifuldt, privat arkivmateriale til rådi","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131179307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-04-27DOI: 10.7146/fof.v49i2.132976
Knud Arne Jürgensen
Dette er et online særnummer. Værkfortegnelsen er ordnet alfabetisk efter første ord i titlen. Værker med tal som første ord i titlen er ordnet numerisk efter den alfabetiske del. Uidentificerede værker er anført alfabetisk til slut i katalogen.
{"title":"Hans Christian Lumbyes kompositioner","authors":"Knud Arne Jürgensen","doi":"10.7146/fof.v49i2.132976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v49i2.132976","url":null,"abstract":"Dette er et online særnummer. Værkfortegnelsen er ordnet alfabetisk efter første ord i titlen. Værker med tal som første ord i titlen er ordnet numerisk efter den alfabetiske del. Uidentificerede værker er anført alfabetisk til slut i katalogen.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129993311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-10-29DOI: 10.7146/fof.v46i2.132978
Knud Arne Jürgensen
Dette er et online særnummer. Fortegnelsen er kronologisk efter udgivelsesåret/udgivelsesmåne-den/årgangsbindet og medtager Herman Bangs både udgivne og utrykte skribentvirksomhed i Danmark, Norge, Sverige og Tyskland, der omhandler emnet scenisk kunst i bredeste betydning: drama (herunder Bangs egne sceniske arbejder og hans utrykte oversættelser af fremmede dramatikeres værker), opera, operette, ballet, musik, visesang, koncerter, cirkus, varieté, tryllekunst etc.1 Posthume førsteudgaver (1914-2004) er placeret samlet og til slut i kronologien. Denne udgave er en ændret udgave fra 2009.
{"title":"Herman Bangs teaterkritik, -journalistik, -essayistik, -poesier, -aforismer og sceniske arbejder (1878-1912)","authors":"Knud Arne Jürgensen","doi":"10.7146/fof.v46i2.132978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v46i2.132978","url":null,"abstract":"Dette er et online særnummer. Fortegnelsen er kronologisk efter udgivelsesåret/udgivelsesmåne-den/årgangsbindet og medtager Herman Bangs både udgivne og utrykte skribentvirksomhed i Danmark, Norge, Sverige og Tyskland, der omhandler emnet scenisk kunst i bredeste betydning: drama (herunder Bangs egne sceniske arbejder og hans utrykte oversættelser af fremmede dramatikeres værker), opera, operette, ballet, musik, visesang, koncerter, cirkus, varieté, tryllekunst etc.1 Posthume førsteudgaver (1914-2004) er placeret samlet og til slut i kronologien. Denne udgave er en ændret udgave fra 2009.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125351185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-09-03DOI: 10.7146/fof.v48i2.132977
Knud Arne Jürgensen
Dette er et online særnummer. Netbibliografien er ordnet kronologisk efter udgivelsesåret/ dagen/måneden/årgangsbindet og medtager Frederik Schybergs (4.12.1905-10.8.1950) udgivne såvel som utrykte skribent-virksomhed i Danmark, Norge, Sverige og Tyskland, der omhandler emnet scenisk kunst i bredeste betydning (forestillingsanmeldelser, dramatiske værker, teaterhistoriske og dramaturgiske arbejder, skuespilbearbejdelser og -oversættelser). Posthume førsteudgaver er placeret samlet og til sidst i kronologien. Ligeledes er alle udaterede trykte og utrykte arbejder og artikler placeret samlet i en fælles gruppe til slut i netbibliografien og så vidt muligt i kronologisk orden.
{"title":"Frederik Schybergs teaterkritik (1924-1950)","authors":"Knud Arne Jürgensen","doi":"10.7146/fof.v48i2.132977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v48i2.132977","url":null,"abstract":"Dette er et online særnummer. Netbibliografien er ordnet kronologisk efter udgivelsesåret/ dagen/måneden/årgangsbindet og medtager Frederik Schybergs (4.12.1905-10.8.1950) udgivne såvel som utrykte skribent-virksomhed i Danmark, Norge, Sverige og Tyskland, der omhandler emnet scenisk kunst i bredeste betydning (forestillingsanmeldelser, dramatiske værker, teaterhistoriske og dramaturgiske arbejder, skuespilbearbejdelser og -oversættelser). Posthume førsteudgaver er placeret samlet og til sidst i kronologien. Ligeledes er alle udaterede trykte og utrykte arbejder og artikler placeret samlet i en fælles gruppe til slut i netbibliografien og så vidt muligt i kronologisk orden.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122259068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.133000
Jurgita Kunsmanaitė
As may be seen from the legal sources of the time, the institution of guardianship of children was fully formed in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania by the beginning of the 16th century. Both the First Lithuanian Statute of 15292 and the court cases of the Books of Court Records of the Lithuanian Metrica – that is, the collection of documents of the chancery of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania – provide various examples of guardianship, covering such questions as the choice and change of guardians, and their rights and obligations.
{"title":"The Legal Status of Female Guardians in 1530s Lithuania","authors":"Jurgita Kunsmanaitė","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.133000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.133000","url":null,"abstract":"As may be seen from the legal sources of the time, the institution of guardianship of children was fully formed in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania by the beginning of the 16th century. Both the First Lithuanian Statute of 15292 and the court cases of the Books of Court Records of the Lithuanian Metrica – that is, the collection of documents of the chancery of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania – provide various examples of guardianship, covering such questions as the choice and change of guardians, and their rights and obligations.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134087753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.132999
Ann Ighe
Fatherlessness seems to be a social problem of long historical continuance. In con-temporary social research we find numerous references to studies of the social effects of the absence of fathers. Divorces and new ways to structure sexual relations are, at least in Europe of today, more common reasons for this than loss through death. However, in the long histori-cal period addressed by this publication, 1100 – 1900, there are some specific social, demo-graphic, economic and even biological features that clearly distinguish these past societies from Europe of the present day. The immense importance connected to a person’s belonging to and position within a household is one of them. A much higher mortality rate is another. Young children constituted an age group among whom the death rate was especially high. But young children were also much more often exposed to the loss of one or both parents com-pared with today. Due to this restructured families through remarriage were very common. So was single parent families headed by widows. However, the breaking up of families through the death of a father was often balanced by a partial, formal restructuring of the family, putting someone else in the father’s place even when remarriage did not occur. To make an overview of this particular kind of guardianship, when and how someone in the legal sense replaces the father to represent the child, is the focus of this article. Regulating the succession of guardianship over children was an important task for families, kinship networks and more public institutions, especially the legal sphere, throughout this long period. Nevertheless, it is not easy to even try to tell a story covering all of Europe for so many centuries. A few notes are the most that can be achieved here, with the ambition to initiate a comparative and overriding discussion of these matters.
{"title":"Replacing the Father - Representing the Child. A Few Notes on the European History of Guardianship","authors":"Ann Ighe","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.132999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132999","url":null,"abstract":"Fatherlessness seems to be a social problem of long historical continuance. In con-temporary social research we find numerous references to studies of the social effects of the absence of fathers. Divorces and new ways to structure sexual relations are, at least in Europe of today, more common reasons for this than loss through death. However, in the long histori-cal period addressed by this publication, 1100 – 1900, there are some specific social, demo-graphic, economic and even biological features that clearly distinguish these past societies from Europe of the present day. The immense importance connected to a person’s belonging to and position within a household is one of them. A much higher mortality rate is another. Young children constituted an age group among whom the death rate was especially high. But young children were also much more often exposed to the loss of one or both parents com-pared with today. Due to this restructured families through remarriage were very common. So was single parent families headed by widows. However, the breaking up of families through the death of a father was often balanced by a partial, formal restructuring of the family, putting someone else in the father’s place even when remarriage did not occur. To make an overview of this particular kind of guardianship, when and how someone in the legal sense replaces the father to represent the child, is the focus of this article. Regulating the succession of guardianship over children was an important task for families, kinship networks and more public institutions, especially the legal sphere, throughout this long period. Nevertheless, it is not easy to even try to tell a story covering all of Europe for so many centuries. A few notes are the most that can be achieved here, with the ambition to initiate a comparative and overriding discussion of these matters.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131972217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.133001
M. Korpiola
Curate Samuel Josephi Lithovius of Limingå (Liminka) in Ostrobothnia was one of the six representatives of the clergy of the diocese of Åbo (Turku) at the diet of Stockholm in 1647. At the diet, however, he was accused by his fellow clergymen of having performed an irregular solemnization (på oordentligit wijs - - hadhe sammanwigdt) at the manor of Åhrsta outside the city of Stockholm. By doing this, he had usurped the authority of another priest and ‘confirmed the madness (galenskap) and disorder with which the parties had commenced their marriage’ for a sum of money. By his actions, he had compromised the whole estate (uppålagdt heela ministerio - - een elack notam).
在1647年的斯德哥尔摩会议上,奥斯博滕尼亚的liming (limlimka)的副牧师塞缪尔·约瑟夫·里斯特维乌斯(Samuel Josephi Lithovius)是Åbo (Turku)教区神职人员的六个代表之一。然而,在议会上,他被他的牧师同伴指控在斯德哥尔摩城外Åhrsta的庄园里举行了一场不定期的仪式(poorddentlighit wijs ? - hadhe sammanwigdt)。通过这样做,他篡夺了另一位牧师的权威,并为了一笔钱“证实了双方在结婚时的疯狂和混乱”。由于他的行为,他已经损害了整个庄园(uppp lagdt heela ministerio - een black notam)。
{"title":"Marrying Off Sons and Daughters: Attitudes towards the Consent of Parents and Guardians in Early Modern Sweden","authors":"M. Korpiola","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.133001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.133001","url":null,"abstract":"Curate Samuel Josephi Lithovius of Limingå (Liminka) in Ostrobothnia was one of the six representatives of the clergy of the diocese of Åbo (Turku) at the diet of Stockholm in 1647. At the diet, however, he was accused by his fellow clergymen of having performed an irregular solemnization (på oordentligit wijs - - hadhe sammanwigdt) at the manor of Åhrsta outside the city of Stockholm. By doing this, he had usurped the authority of another priest and ‘confirmed the madness (galenskap) and disorder with which the parties had commenced their marriage’ for a sum of money. By his actions, he had compromised the whole estate (uppålagdt heela ministerio - - een elack notam).","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"35 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113993222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.132993
E. Forster
When the ABGB was published in 1811 it contained the provision that women were not allowed to take over guardianship of children except mothers or grandmothers.1 If the father had not appointed a guardian in his last will, first the paternal grandfather, then the mother and after the paternal grandmother all other male relatives were considered as guar-dians.2 In contrast to male guardians the mother and grandmother had the possibility to refuse. This can be seen as a reflection of old female “protective” measures to pretend them from acting against their advantage. It fits into the picture that whenever mothers or grandmothers took over guardianship they needed a so-called Mitvormund (co-guardian).3The argumentation for prohibiting women other than mothers and grandmothers to take over guardianship was that they were thought not to have enough knowledge of business affairs. Franz von Zeiller, the person mainly responsible for the final formulation of the civil code, wrote in his law commentary: „Der Grund der Vorschrift ist offenbar, weil es diesen Personen gewöhnlich … an den nothwendigen Kenntnissen … mangelt.“4 He saw the care of their own children as the mothers’ and grandmothers’ primary duty, but a co-guardian was needed, „um das vorzüglich in Rechtsgeschäften minder erfahrene Geschlecht in Führung derselben zu unterstützen.“5 Both the father and the mother had the right to propose a co-guardian, but the court was not bound by this proposal.Before I interpret these assumptions I want to take a look on the process leading up to this provision because looking at the history of the work on the codification, another outcome was also possible. After that I trace the development throughout the 19th century, take a look at the efforts of the women’s movement at the turn of the century and finally sketch the change of law right before the outbreak of World War I in 1914. At the center of my considerations are always the arguments used for explaining the different prohibitions or demands because they throw a light on the representations of gender roles among different social groups and during different periods.
1811年公布的ABGB载有规定,除母亲或祖母外,妇女不得接管儿童的监护权如果父亲在最后遗嘱中没有指定监护人,则首先是祖父,然后是母亲,然后是祖母,所有其他男性亲属都被视为监护人与男性监护人相比,母亲和祖母有可能拒绝。这可以看作是老年女性“保护”措施的反映,假装她们的行为不利于她们的优势。每当母亲或祖母接管监护权时,她们就需要一个所谓的Mitvormund(共同监护人)。禁止母亲和祖母以外的女性接管监护权的理由是,她们被认为没有足够的商业知识。主要负责最终制定民法典的弗朗茨·冯·泽勒(Franz von Zeiller)在他的法律评论中写道:“Der Grund Der Vorschrift ist offenbar, weil es diesen Personen gewöhnlich……and den nothwendigen Kenntnissen……mangelt。”“他认为照顾自己的孩子是母亲和祖母的首要职责,但需要一个共同监护人,”他说,“我们需要一个共同监护人。”父亲和母亲都有权提议共同监护人,但法院不受这一提议的约束。在我解释这些假设之前,我想看看导致这一规定的过程,因为看看编纂工作的历史,另一种结果也是可能的。之后,我追溯了整个19世纪的发展,看看世纪之交妇女运动的努力,最后概述了1914年第一次世界大战爆发前法律的变化。我考虑的中心总是用来解释不同禁令或要求的论据,因为它们揭示了不同社会群体和不同时期性别角色的表现。
{"title":"The Construction of „Male Capability“ and „Female Inability” to assume Guardianship of Children in the Austrian “Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetz-buch” (ABGB) in the 19th Century”","authors":"E. Forster","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.132993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132993","url":null,"abstract":"When the ABGB was published in 1811 it contained the provision that women were not allowed to take over guardianship of children except mothers or grandmothers.1 If the father had not appointed a guardian in his last will, first the paternal grandfather, then the mother and after the paternal grandmother all other male relatives were considered as guar-dians.2 In contrast to male guardians the mother and grandmother had the possibility to refuse. This can be seen as a reflection of old female “protective” measures to pretend them from acting against their advantage. It fits into the picture that whenever mothers or grandmothers took over guardianship they needed a so-called Mitvormund (co-guardian).3The argumentation for prohibiting women other than mothers and grandmothers to take over guardianship was that they were thought not to have enough knowledge of business affairs. Franz von Zeiller, the person mainly responsible for the final formulation of the civil code, wrote in his law commentary: „Der Grund der Vorschrift ist offenbar, weil es diesen Personen gewöhnlich … an den nothwendigen Kenntnissen … mangelt.“4 He saw the care of their own children as the mothers’ and grandmothers’ primary duty, but a co-guardian was needed, „um das vorzüglich in Rechtsgeschäften minder erfahrene Geschlecht in Führung derselben zu unterstützen.“5 Both the father and the mother had the right to propose a co-guardian, but the court was not bound by this proposal.Before I interpret these assumptions I want to take a look on the process leading up to this provision because looking at the history of the work on the codification, another outcome was also possible. After that I trace the development throughout the 19th century, take a look at the efforts of the women’s movement at the turn of the century and finally sketch the change of law right before the outbreak of World War I in 1914. At the center of my considerations are always the arguments used for explaining the different prohibitions or demands because they throw a light on the representations of gender roles among different social groups and during different periods.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123229999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.133025
Agnes S. Arnórsdóttir
The marriage legislation of medieval Iceland are to be found in the provincial law collection of Grágás, from the late 12th and early 13th century, the New Christian Law of 1275, the royal lawbook of Jónsbók from 1281, as well as the correction of the royal law in the 14th century, and many Church statutes of the same century. These regulation, as well as the change in the legislation after the Reformation in the 16th century, can give valuable indi-cation of change in gender relation. All these regulation where highly influenced directly or indirectly by the international Church law, called canon law. In this paper I shall not primarily discuss this legal regulations rather give some ideas of how the law was used (and shaped on a textual level) at the local courts. Examples will be taken from several court case narrations.
{"title":"Changing Gender Relation in Medieval and Early Modern Iceland: The Role of Canon Law According to Court Case Narratives","authors":"Agnes S. Arnórsdóttir","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.133025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.133025","url":null,"abstract":"The marriage legislation of medieval Iceland are to be found in the provincial law collection of Grágás, from the late 12th and early 13th century, the New Christian Law of 1275, the royal lawbook of Jónsbók from 1281, as well as the correction of the royal law in the 14th century, and many Church statutes of the same century. These regulation, as well as the change in the legislation after the Reformation in the 16th century, can give valuable indi-cation of change in gender relation. All these regulation where highly influenced directly or indirectly by the international Church law, called canon law. In this paper I shall not primarily discuss this legal regulations rather give some ideas of how the law was used (and shaped on a textual level) at the local courts. Examples will be taken from several court case narrations.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121968491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-10-14DOI: 10.7146/fof.v44i3.132983
I. Dübeck, G. Jacobsen, H. Vogt
{"title":"Preface / Vorwort","authors":"I. Dübeck, G. Jacobsen, H. Vogt","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.132983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132983","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122408124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}