Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08995-1
Amanda E Janitz, Amber S Anderson-Buettner, Stefani D Madison, Mark P Doescher, Ryan Nipp, Sheryl Buckner, Dorothy A Rhoades
Purpose: Native American (NA) patients with cancer are at increased risk of financial hardship due to lack of private health insurance coverage, medical comorbidities, and higher poverty rates. We aimed to implement and evaluate a pilot financial hardship screening (FHS) program among NA patients with cancer.
Methods: In 2022, we piloted the implementation of FHS among adult NA patients with cancer referred by NA-specific health facilities to an NCI-designated cancer center using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. We dichotomized COST-FACIT scores as mild/no hardship (26-44) and moderate/severe hardship (≤ 25). To evaluate the implementation, we conducted interviews with patients and clinical staff who participated in the screening process. We thematically analyzed interview transcriptions using inductive and deductive coding to identify themes.
Results: Of 42 patients completing FHS, 76.2% reported moderate/severe hardship. Ten patients and four clinical staff (1 physician, 3 NA navigation staff) completed interviews. We identified three themes: (1) FHS perceptions and intervention experiences, (2) FHS efficacy and opportunities for expansion, and (3) nuances for NA patients and patient-related factors. Patients expressed positive experiences with FHS, including identifying financial challenges, but preferences regarding timing varied. Staff reported logistic and sustainability challenges in implementing FHS. However, clinic staff reported positive experiences with the tool, interactions with patients, and the resulting supportive care referrals.
Conclusion: Implementation of FHS for NA patients with cancer was well received by patients and staff and was perceived by both groups as facilitating efforts to address financial hardship. Measures to improve staffing and sustainability are needed to enable broader implementation.
目的:由于缺乏私人医疗保险、合并症和较高的贫困率,美国原住民癌症患者面临经济困难的风险增加。我们的目标是在美国原住民癌症患者中实施并评估一项经济困难筛查(FHS)试点计划:2022年,我们使用经济毒性综合评分--慢性病治疗功能评估(COST-FACIT)工具,在由NA特定医疗机构转诊至NCI指定癌症中心的成年NA癌症患者中试行经济困难筛查。我们将 COST-FACIT 分数分为轻度/无困难(26-44 分)和中度/严重困难(≤ 25 分)。为了评估实施情况,我们对参与筛查过程的患者和临床工作人员进行了访谈。我们采用归纳和演绎编码法对访谈记录进行了专题分析,以确定主题:在完成家庭健康调查的 42 名患者中,76.2% 的患者表示有中度/重度困难。10 名患者和 4 名临床工作人员(1 名医生、3 名 NA 导航人员)完成了访谈。我们确定了三个主题:(1) 家庭健康服务的认知和干预经验;(2) 家庭健康服务的功效和扩展机会;(3) NA 患者的细微差别和患者相关因素。患者对家庭健康服务表示了积极的体验,包括发现了财务方面的挑战,但对时间的偏好各不相同。工作人员报告了实施家庭健康服务在后勤和可持续性方面的挑战。不过,诊所工作人员在使用该工具、与患者互动以及由此产生的支持性护理转介方面都有积极的体验:结论:为新来乍到的癌症患者实施家庭健康服务受到了患者和医务人员的欢迎,他们都认为该服务有助于解决经济困难问题。需要采取措施改善人员配备和可持续性,以便更广泛地实施。
{"title":"Pilot implementation and qualitative evaluation of a financial hardship screening among Native American patients with cancer.","authors":"Amanda E Janitz, Amber S Anderson-Buettner, Stefani D Madison, Mark P Doescher, Ryan Nipp, Sheryl Buckner, Dorothy A Rhoades","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08995-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-08995-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Native American (NA) patients with cancer are at increased risk of financial hardship due to lack of private health insurance coverage, medical comorbidities, and higher poverty rates. We aimed to implement and evaluate a pilot financial hardship screening (FHS) program among NA patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, we piloted the implementation of FHS among adult NA patients with cancer referred by NA-specific health facilities to an NCI-designated cancer center using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. We dichotomized COST-FACIT scores as mild/no hardship (26-44) and moderate/severe hardship (≤ 25). To evaluate the implementation, we conducted interviews with patients and clinical staff who participated in the screening process. We thematically analyzed interview transcriptions using inductive and deductive coding to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 42 patients completing FHS, 76.2% reported moderate/severe hardship. Ten patients and four clinical staff (1 physician, 3 NA navigation staff) completed interviews. We identified three themes: (1) FHS perceptions and intervention experiences, (2) FHS efficacy and opportunities for expansion, and (3) nuances for NA patients and patient-related factors. Patients expressed positive experiences with FHS, including identifying financial challenges, but preferences regarding timing varied. Staff reported logistic and sustainability challenges in implementing FHS. However, clinic staff reported positive experiences with the tool, interactions with patients, and the resulting supportive care referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of FHS for NA patients with cancer was well received by patients and staff and was perceived by both groups as facilitating efforts to address financial hardship. Measures to improve staffing and sustainability are needed to enable broader implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause multi-organ adverse events, namely immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological information on irAEs in patients with cancer referred to the palliative care team (PCT).
Methods: The medical records of cancer patients with a history of ICI therapy referred to the PCT at a tertiary care center between January 2017 and July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed in this single-center, observational study.
Results: The median age of the 140 patients was 68 years, and lung (39.3%) being the most common primary site. We observed irAEs in 46 patients (32.9%), and hypothyroidism was the most common irAE. For irAEs graded ≥ 3 in 21 patients, pneumonitis was the most common adverse event. As for strategies for management with irAEs, seventeen patients were treated with systemic steroids. irAEs ( +) had a significantly lower Performance Status at the start of ICI, a higher total number of ICI doses, and longer duration from start of ICI to date of death than irAEs (-).
Conclusions: Among 140 cancer patients with a history of ICIs therapy consulted to the PCT, the prevalence of irAEs was 32.9%, and 21 patients (15.0%) developed irAEs with grade ≥ 3. As the use of ICI is expected to increase in the future, it is important for palliative care physicians to increase their awareness of the management of irAEs and collaborate with oncologists from an early stage.
{"title":"Immune-related adverse events in cancer patients referred to the palliative care team of a tertiary care center: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Ryota Yanaizumi, Yusuke Nagamine, Shinsuke Harada, Takahisa Goto","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09012-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-09012-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause multi-organ adverse events, namely immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological information on irAEs in patients with cancer referred to the palliative care team (PCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of cancer patients with a history of ICI therapy referred to the PCT at a tertiary care center between January 2017 and July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed in this single-center, observational study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the 140 patients was 68 years, and lung (39.3%) being the most common primary site. We observed irAEs in 46 patients (32.9%), and hypothyroidism was the most common irAE. For irAEs graded ≥ 3 in 21 patients, pneumonitis was the most common adverse event. As for strategies for management with irAEs, seventeen patients were treated with systemic steroids. irAEs ( +) had a significantly lower Performance Status at the start of ICI, a higher total number of ICI doses, and longer duration from start of ICI to date of death than irAEs (-).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among 140 cancer patients with a history of ICIs therapy consulted to the PCT, the prevalence of irAEs was 32.9%, and 21 patients (15.0%) developed irAEs with grade ≥ 3. As the use of ICI is expected to increase in the future, it is important for palliative care physicians to increase their awareness of the management of irAEs and collaborate with oncologists from an early stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08978-2
Anna S Wagner, L Wehlen, Marlena Milzer, Martina E Schmidt, Senta Kiermeier, Imad Maatouk, Karen Steindorf
Purpose: Contrary to guidelines, many cancer patients are not screened for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and do not receive information or adequate treatment. As physicians play a key role in cancer therapy, their knowledge of this common sequela and perspectives on its management are of major interest.
Methods: For an online survey, physicians working in oncology in Germany were systematically drawn from registers and invited by using institutional newsletters or colleagues. Descriptive analyses, logistic regression analysis of physicians' knowledge, and Mann‒Whitney U tests were performed.
Results: Two-thirds of the 148 surveyed physicians felt (rather) well informed about CRF and capable of counseling patients. Only 32% of the sample were aware of CRF-specific guidelines. Despite of this, participants rated the scientific evidence for recommending physical activity, exercise programs, and psychotherapeutic interventions in accordance with guidelines as being mostly (very) strong. However, despite 82.4% of the physicians being (rather) aware of its evidence, only 56.1% often to almost always recommended psychotherapeutic interventions. CRF was rarely covered in medical studies and medical specialist training. The completion of advanced training for palliative care increased the likelihood of knowing guidelines (OR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.1-6.0], p < 0.05). Suggestions for improving training included the mandatory coverage of CRF in medical training or its consideration in interprofessional supportive care workshops.
Conclusion: Although awareness and recommendation rates were adequate for some interventions in CRF treatment (such as physical activity), there were lower recommendation rates for others, including psychotherapy. Studies are required assessing for the reasons of this knowledge-to-practice gap. Moreover, training is needed among physicians in order to enhance knowledge of CRF guidelines.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT04921644. Registered in June 2021.
{"title":"Physicians' perspectives on cancer-related fatigue management and their suggestions for improvements in medical training: a cross-sectional survey study in Germany.","authors":"Anna S Wagner, L Wehlen, Marlena Milzer, Martina E Schmidt, Senta Kiermeier, Imad Maatouk, Karen Steindorf","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08978-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-08978-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Contrary to guidelines, many cancer patients are not screened for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and do not receive information or adequate treatment. As physicians play a key role in cancer therapy, their knowledge of this common sequela and perspectives on its management are of major interest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For an online survey, physicians working in oncology in Germany were systematically drawn from registers and invited by using institutional newsletters or colleagues. Descriptive analyses, logistic regression analysis of physicians' knowledge, and Mann‒Whitney U tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-thirds of the 148 surveyed physicians felt (rather) well informed about CRF and capable of counseling patients. Only 32% of the sample were aware of CRF-specific guidelines. Despite of this, participants rated the scientific evidence for recommending physical activity, exercise programs, and psychotherapeutic interventions in accordance with guidelines as being mostly (very) strong. However, despite 82.4% of the physicians being (rather) aware of its evidence, only 56.1% often to almost always recommended psychotherapeutic interventions. CRF was rarely covered in medical studies and medical specialist training. The completion of advanced training for palliative care increased the likelihood of knowing guidelines (OR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.1-6.0], p < 0.05). Suggestions for improving training included the mandatory coverage of CRF in medical training or its consideration in interprofessional supportive care workshops.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although awareness and recommendation rates were adequate for some interventions in CRF treatment (such as physical activity), there were lower recommendation rates for others, including psychotherapy. Studies are required assessing for the reasons of this knowledge-to-practice gap. Moreover, training is needed among physicians in order to enhance knowledge of CRF guidelines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT04921644. Registered in June 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560979/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in cancer patients is high. During the medication review process, clinical pharmacists could detect and manage drug-related problems (DRP) to optimize pharmacotherapy but there is a need to standardize pharmacists' interventions (PI) especially for T2DM-related DRP. The present study aims to describe DRP in cancer patients with T2DM undergoing anticancer treatment (AT) and to propose related preliminary guidelines to manage T2DM-related DRP.
Methods: The study was conducted in one oncology outpatient hospital where a clinical pharmacy team performs medication reviews to detect and manage DRP by performing PI in cancer patients undergoing AT. All the data from November 23rd, 2015 to November 23rd, 2019 were extracted and demographic, clinical, oncological, and biological data were collected and analyzed. Based on these results and a literature review, a working group (2 pharmacists and one diabetologist) was constituted to propose a first set of preliminary guidelines clinical pharmacists that were then reviewed using the Delphi method by an expert panel of oncologists and pharmacists.
Results: A total of 161 T2DM cancer patients were included in the study (19.7% of all cancer patients screened). Overall, 152 DRP (mean 1.67/patient) were detected (49.3% drug interaction) and 152 PI were performed by clinical pharmacists, mainly drug monitoring (48.0) and drug discontinuation (25.7%). Specifically, there was 24 T2DM-related DRP (including 29.2% drug interactions). Twenty-four DRPs were directly related to T2DM status. The five proposed guidelines reached a consensus after revisions and a sixth has been added.
Conclusion: DRPs were frequent among cancer patients with T2DM and we hypothesize that the preliminary guidelines should improve the detection of DRPs directly related to T2DM. The implementation of the preliminary guidelines should now be assessed in clinical practice.
{"title":"Preliminary guidelines for the detection and management of drug-related problems in cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a practical resource for oncology pharmacists.","authors":"Chloé Gossery, Justine Clarenne, Sara Barraud, Mathias Brugel, Mathieu Boulin, Claire Carlier, Marine Perrier, Damien Botsen, Dominique Hettler, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Céline Mongaret, Olivier Bouché, Florian Slimano","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09014-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-09014-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in cancer patients is high. During the medication review process, clinical pharmacists could detect and manage drug-related problems (DRP) to optimize pharmacotherapy but there is a need to standardize pharmacists' interventions (PI) especially for T2DM-related DRP. The present study aims to describe DRP in cancer patients with T2DM undergoing anticancer treatment (AT) and to propose related preliminary guidelines to manage T2DM-related DRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in one oncology outpatient hospital where a clinical pharmacy team performs medication reviews to detect and manage DRP by performing PI in cancer patients undergoing AT. All the data from November 23rd, 2015 to November 23rd, 2019 were extracted and demographic, clinical, oncological, and biological data were collected and analyzed. Based on these results and a literature review, a working group (2 pharmacists and one diabetologist) was constituted to propose a first set of preliminary guidelines clinical pharmacists that were then reviewed using the Delphi method by an expert panel of oncologists and pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 T2DM cancer patients were included in the study (19.7% of all cancer patients screened). Overall, 152 DRP (mean 1.67/patient) were detected (49.3% drug interaction) and 152 PI were performed by clinical pharmacists, mainly drug monitoring (48.0) and drug discontinuation (25.7%). Specifically, there was 24 T2DM-related DRP (including 29.2% drug interactions). Twenty-four DRPs were directly related to T2DM status. The five proposed guidelines reached a consensus after revisions and a sixth has been added.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRPs were frequent among cancer patients with T2DM and we hypothesize that the preliminary guidelines should improve the detection of DRPs directly related to T2DM. The implementation of the preliminary guidelines should now be assessed in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09002-3
Maiko Shimosato, Naoki Sakane
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Exploring the integration of dentistry within a multidisciplinary palliative care team: does bedside dental care improve quality of life and symptom burden in inpatient palliative care patients?","authors":"Maiko Shimosato, Naoki Sakane","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09002-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09002-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08981-7
Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Katharina Pal-Handl, Verena Wasinger-Brandweiner, Kristina Herzog, Kirsten Neumann, Tobias Schellenberg, Dorothee Schönenberger-Loppacher, Christiane Faist-Schweika, Barbara Schönthaler, Mihaela Budich, Nicole Stember, Karin Wiegele, Maike Reddig, Anne Paduch, Iris Lein-Köhler, Sonja Görgen, Heike Wienands, Hiltrud Gauf, Rahel Hoffmann, Alina Kollmann, Ulrike Just, Nicole Salzmann, Petra Neunsinger, Marina Gerhardt, Stefanie Essl, Janina Borbely, Manuel Köpper, Sarah Rinner, Lisa Schubert, Ulrike Leiss
Purpose: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are essential to improve the well-being and neurocognitive outcomes of pediatric cancer patients; however, considerable barriers hamper the implementation of these tools. The present study assessed health care professionals' (HCP) perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a specific EBI for pediatric oncology in a standardized manner to define effective solutions and practical recommendations.
Methods: An adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) questionnaire was applied to inquire n = 31 HCPs in pediatric oncology about the five domains of implementation.
Results: While most 'intervention characteristics' were considered beneficial for implementation, various aspects of the 'inner' and 'outer setting' were considered problematic. The most prevalent barriers included a shortage in resources, poor integration of EBIs into policies and lacking incentives such as user benefits. Concrete proposed and realized steps to facilitate effective implementation include a patient-focused design and continuous evaluation and adaption of the tool, a detailed EBI user manual and application workshops, as well as regular interdisciplinary meetings to improve communication. Regarding the internal and external settings, involving policy makers, establishing psychosocial care in the insurance system and increasing awareness by sharing evidence are essential steps for improved implementation.
Conclusion: Based on standardized implementation evaluation, various targeted actions could be defined and implemented to facilitate successful implementation of EBIs in pediatric oncology. The results emphasize that psychosocial care must become an integral part of treatment standards and public health policies to ensure that effective psychosocial interventions for improved wellbeing and neurocognitive skills successfully reach pediatric cancer patients.
{"title":"Benefits of applying standardized frameworks to implement psychosocial tools such as the 'My Logbook'.","authors":"Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Katharina Pal-Handl, Verena Wasinger-Brandweiner, Kristina Herzog, Kirsten Neumann, Tobias Schellenberg, Dorothee Schönenberger-Loppacher, Christiane Faist-Schweika, Barbara Schönthaler, Mihaela Budich, Nicole Stember, Karin Wiegele, Maike Reddig, Anne Paduch, Iris Lein-Köhler, Sonja Görgen, Heike Wienands, Hiltrud Gauf, Rahel Hoffmann, Alina Kollmann, Ulrike Just, Nicole Salzmann, Petra Neunsinger, Marina Gerhardt, Stefanie Essl, Janina Borbely, Manuel Köpper, Sarah Rinner, Lisa Schubert, Ulrike Leiss","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08981-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-08981-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are essential to improve the well-being and neurocognitive outcomes of pediatric cancer patients; however, considerable barriers hamper the implementation of these tools. The present study assessed health care professionals' (HCP) perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a specific EBI for pediatric oncology in a standardized manner to define effective solutions and practical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) questionnaire was applied to inquire n = 31 HCPs in pediatric oncology about the five domains of implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most 'intervention characteristics' were considered beneficial for implementation, various aspects of the 'inner' and 'outer setting' were considered problematic. The most prevalent barriers included a shortage in resources, poor integration of EBIs into policies and lacking incentives such as user benefits. Concrete proposed and realized steps to facilitate effective implementation include a patient-focused design and continuous evaluation and adaption of the tool, a detailed EBI user manual and application workshops, as well as regular interdisciplinary meetings to improve communication. Regarding the internal and external settings, involving policy makers, establishing psychosocial care in the insurance system and increasing awareness by sharing evidence are essential steps for improved implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on standardized implementation evaluation, various targeted actions could be defined and implemented to facilitate successful implementation of EBIs in pediatric oncology. The results emphasize that psychosocial care must become an integral part of treatment standards and public health policies to ensure that effective psychosocial interventions for improved wellbeing and neurocognitive skills successfully reach pediatric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04474678 (July 17th 2020).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561021/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y
Irene Liang, Djin L Tay, Anne C Kirchhoff, Garrett Schwanke, Lee Ellington, Maria Pisu, Kathi Mooney
Purpose: Financial toxicity, cancer-treatment-related financial harm, is associated with expensive treatments like immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore financial toxicity among advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers and, secondarily, to study how recent inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these experiences.
Methods: Advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews about supportive care needs from 2022 to 2023. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity was collected. Guided by Jones et al.'s cancer financial toxicity model, the content analysis was conducted by two trained coders using NVIVO R1.
Results: Sixteen patients and 10 caregivers (including 7 dyads) across 5 states participated in interviews in 2022-2023. Participants averaged 63.43 years (SD = 12.75), and patients received an average of 14.6 months of immunotherapy (SD = 9.415). The majority lived in non-metropolitan areas (67%) and were white (95%). Three theory-driven themes were developed: (1) Sources of Financial Toxicity, (2) Buffers of Financial Toxicity, and (3) Consequences of Financial Toxicity. Inflation was added to financial toxicity for non-metropolitan dwelling participants due to increased prices of gas and accommodation. Social support systems buffered the impact of financial toxicity. Material and psychological impacts of financial toxicity disproportionately affected younger and privately insured participants.
Conclusion: While immunotherapy patients face high medical costs of treatment, the burdens of accessing treatment for people living at a distance from the cancer center can exacerbate financial toxicity. Clinicians and researchers should also consider external financial pressures such as national economic impacts that compound the financial toxicity of treatment.
{"title":"Financial toxicity of total cancer care immunotherapy patients and caregivers: impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and inflation.","authors":"Irene Liang, Djin L Tay, Anne C Kirchhoff, Garrett Schwanke, Lee Ellington, Maria Pisu, Kathi Mooney","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity, cancer-treatment-related financial harm, is associated with expensive treatments like immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore financial toxicity among advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers and, secondarily, to study how recent inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews about supportive care needs from 2022 to 2023. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity was collected. Guided by Jones et al.'s cancer financial toxicity model, the content analysis was conducted by two trained coders using NVIVO R1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients and 10 caregivers (including 7 dyads) across 5 states participated in interviews in 2022-2023. Participants averaged 63.43 years (SD = 12.75), and patients received an average of 14.6 months of immunotherapy (SD = 9.415). The majority lived in non-metropolitan areas (67%) and were white (95%). Three theory-driven themes were developed: (1) Sources of Financial Toxicity, (2) Buffers of Financial Toxicity, and (3) Consequences of Financial Toxicity. Inflation was added to financial toxicity for non-metropolitan dwelling participants due to increased prices of gas and accommodation. Social support systems buffered the impact of financial toxicity. Material and psychological impacts of financial toxicity disproportionately affected younger and privately insured participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While immunotherapy patients face high medical costs of treatment, the burdens of accessing treatment for people living at a distance from the cancer center can exacerbate financial toxicity. Clinicians and researchers should also consider external financial pressures such as national economic impacts that compound the financial toxicity of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08977-3
E Marconi, S Bracci, L Dinapoli, L Sani, B Di Capua, A Bellieni, I Costamagna, L Tagliaferri, M A Gambacorta, V Valentini, D P R Chieffo, G F Colloca
Purpose: This study investigated the prevalence and determinants of psychosocial distress among hospitalized patients undergoing radiotherapy to identify opportunities for interventions to enhance patient well-being.
Methods: Between January 2021 and May 2023, 137 hospitalized patients received radiotherapy treatment at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Fondazione A. Gemelli IRCCS were recruited. Participants completed a questionnaire comprising the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Results: The study revealed a significant correlation among anxiety, depression, total HADS scores, and Distress Thermometer scores (p < 0.001). Female patients exhibited higher total HADS scores and anxiety levels compared to males (p < 0.004, p < 0.010, respectively). Sleep disturbances were associated with increased anxiety, depression, and overall distress (p < 0.05). Younger patients (< 65 years old) demonstrated elevated anxiety and depression levels, while no significant depressive tendency was observed among older participants (> 65 years old).
Conclusion: These findings underscore the intricate interplay between demographic variables, psychological distress, and treatment-related symptoms among patients during radiotherapy treatments. The study highlights the critical necessity of promptly identifying and addressing psychosocial distress in this population. It suggests that implementing a psychological therapeutic approach, particularly one focused on support, could effectively deter the onset of depression, especially among younger patients. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to explore distress trajectories and interventions' effectiveness in mitigating distress, with collaborative efforts to translate research findings into evidence-based clinical practice for improved patient care.
{"title":"The assessment of psychosocial distress in hospitalized cancer patients during radio-oncological treatment: a monocentric experience study.","authors":"E Marconi, S Bracci, L Dinapoli, L Sani, B Di Capua, A Bellieni, I Costamagna, L Tagliaferri, M A Gambacorta, V Valentini, D P R Chieffo, G F Colloca","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08977-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08977-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the prevalence and determinants of psychosocial distress among hospitalized patients undergoing radiotherapy to identify opportunities for interventions to enhance patient well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021 and May 2023, 137 hospitalized patients received radiotherapy treatment at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Fondazione A. Gemelli IRCCS were recruited. Participants completed a questionnaire comprising the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a significant correlation among anxiety, depression, total HADS scores, and Distress Thermometer scores (p < 0.001). Female patients exhibited higher total HADS scores and anxiety levels compared to males (p < 0.004, p < 0.010, respectively). Sleep disturbances were associated with increased anxiety, depression, and overall distress (p < 0.05). Younger patients (< 65 years old) demonstrated elevated anxiety and depression levels, while no significant depressive tendency was observed among older participants (> 65 years old).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the intricate interplay between demographic variables, psychological distress, and treatment-related symptoms among patients during radiotherapy treatments. The study highlights the critical necessity of promptly identifying and addressing psychosocial distress in this population. It suggests that implementing a psychological therapeutic approach, particularly one focused on support, could effectively deter the onset of depression, especially among younger patients. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to explore distress trajectories and interventions' effectiveness in mitigating distress, with collaborative efforts to translate research findings into evidence-based clinical practice for improved patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09004-1
Alicia Del-Rosal-Jurado, Manuel González-Sánchez, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas
Introduction: Cancer is amongst the leading causes of death worldwide. A total of 19.3 million new cases were diagnosed in 2020. Cardiovascular impairment is the second leading cause of death in patients undergoing cancer treatment. By measuring the maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2max) in cancer patients, it is possible to estimate their cardiorespiratory health. This study aims to show how participants' VO2max increases with a therapeutic physical exercise programme.
Methods: Four databases were used for the literature search. Twenty-eight studies were analysed using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of these studies was analysed with the PEDRO scale. The structural characteristics of the articles and the study variable (VO2max) were studied.
Results: The VO2max of the 2558 patients studied presents some variations by gender, intervention and moment of measurement. For male-associated cancer, the increased VO2max ranged between 1.5 and 4.2% after the intervention. The increase in the maximum VO2max in female-associated cancer was between 0.3 and 53%. Different types of cancer for both genders presented an oscillation between 0.5 and 3.47%.
Conclusions: Therapeutic physical exercise is an efficient intervention to improve the VO2max in oncology patients. The results show that a therapeutic physical exercise intervention lasting 12 weeks, 3 days per week with a moderate-vigorous intensity, increases the VO2max in oncology patients.
{"title":"Effect of therapeutic exercise on peak oxygen consumption in oncological population: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Alicia Del-Rosal-Jurado, Manuel González-Sánchez, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09004-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-024-09004-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer is amongst the leading causes of death worldwide. A total of 19.3 million new cases were diagnosed in 2020. Cardiovascular impairment is the second leading cause of death in patients undergoing cancer treatment. By measuring the maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>max) in cancer patients, it is possible to estimate their cardiorespiratory health. This study aims to show how participants' VO<sub>2</sub>max increases with a therapeutic physical exercise programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were used for the literature search. Twenty-eight studies were analysed using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of these studies was analysed with the PEDRO scale. The structural characteristics of the articles and the study variable (VO<sub>2</sub>max) were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VO<sub>2</sub>max of the 2558 patients studied presents some variations by gender, intervention and moment of measurement. For male-associated cancer, the increased VO<sub>2</sub>max ranged between 1.5 and 4.2% after the intervention. The increase in the maximum VO<sub>2</sub>max in female-associated cancer was between 0.3 and 53%. Different types of cancer for both genders presented an oscillation between 0.5 and 3.47%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic physical exercise is an efficient intervention to improve the VO<sub>2</sub>max in oncology patients. The results show that a therapeutic physical exercise intervention lasting 12 weeks, 3 days per week with a moderate-vigorous intensity, increases the VO<sub>2</sub>max in oncology patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561107/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08993-3
Jesús Baltasar González-Rubino, Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil, Rocío Martín-Valero
{"title":"Correction to: Effectiveness of physical therapy in axillary web syndrome after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.","authors":"Jesús Baltasar González-Rubino, Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil, Rocío Martín-Valero","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08993-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08993-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554756/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}