首页 > 最新文献

Studies in Family Planning最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluating Contraceptive Empowerment Among Women and Girls in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Validation of the Women's and Girls’ Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health (WGE‐SRH) Index Contraceptive Empowerment Subscale 评估撒哈拉以南非洲妇女和女孩的避孕赋权:妇女和女孩在性健康和生殖健康方面的赋权(WGE - SRH)指数避孕赋权子量表的验证
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70011
Celia Karp, Shannon N. Wood, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Funmilola M. OlaOlorun, Pierre Z. Akilimali, Simon Peter Sebina Kibira, Fredrick Makumbi, Georges Guiella, Peter Gichangi, Caroline Moreau
This study evaluates the contraceptive empowerment subscale of the Women's and Girls’ Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health (WGE‐SRH) index across seven sub‐Saharan African countries. Using structural equation modeling and logistic regression among population‐based samples of women aged 15–49, we find evidence that the abbreviated eight‐item subscale is a reliable measure of contraceptive empowerment (Cronbach's alpha range: 0.67–0.78), significantly associated with women's involvement in the decision to use contraception. Results show geographic variability, with the highest overall contraceptive empowerment in Kenya (mean = 4.26, range: 1–5) and lowest in Uganda (mean = 3.67), reflecting diverse fertility trends, contraceptive norms, and gendered power dynamics. The subscale's two‐dimensional structure—distinguishing existence and exercise of choice—proves effective, with existence of choice being a stronger correlate of involvement in contraceptive use decisions than exercise in most settings. Despite some challenges, such as variable factor loadings, the subscale shows acceptable internal consistency and construct validity. This research underscores the need for multidimensional measures of reproductive empowerment to capture this nuanced process.
本研究评估了七个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的妇女和女童性健康和生殖健康赋权(WGE - SRH)指数的避孕赋权子量表。使用结构方程模型和逻辑回归对15-49岁的女性群体样本进行分析,我们发现证据表明,缩短的8项子量表是避孕授权的可靠衡量标准(Cronbach's alpha范围:0.67-0.78),与女性参与使用避孕措施的决定显著相关。结果显示出地域差异,肯尼亚的总体避孕赋权最高(平均值= 4.26,范围:1-5),乌干达最低(平均值= 3.67),反映了不同的生育趋势、避孕规范和性别权力动态。子量表的二维结构——区分选择的存在和行使——被证明是有效的,在大多数情况下,选择的存在与参与避孕使用决策的相关性比行使更强。尽管存在一些挑战,如可变因子负载,子量表显示出可接受的内部一致性和结构效度。这项研究强调了需要多维的生殖赋权措施来捕捉这一微妙的过程。
{"title":"Evaluating Contraceptive Empowerment Among Women and Girls in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Validation of the Women's and Girls’ Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health (WGE‐SRH) Index Contraceptive Empowerment Subscale","authors":"Celia Karp, Shannon N. Wood, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Funmilola M. OlaOlorun, Pierre Z. Akilimali, Simon Peter Sebina Kibira, Fredrick Makumbi, Georges Guiella, Peter Gichangi, Caroline Moreau","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70011","url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the contraceptive empowerment subscale of the Women's and Girls’ Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health (WGE‐SRH) index across seven sub‐Saharan African countries. Using structural equation modeling and logistic regression among population‐based samples of women aged 15–49, we find evidence that the abbreviated eight‐item subscale is a reliable measure of contraceptive empowerment (Cronbach's alpha range: 0.67–0.78), significantly associated with women's involvement in the decision to use contraception. Results show geographic variability, with the highest overall contraceptive empowerment in Kenya (mean = 4.26, range: 1–5) and lowest in Uganda (mean = 3.67), reflecting diverse fertility trends, contraceptive norms, and gendered power dynamics. The subscale's two‐dimensional structure—distinguishing existence and exercise of choice—proves effective, with existence of choice being a stronger correlate of involvement in contraceptive use decisions than exercise in most settings. Despite some challenges, such as variable factor loadings, the subscale shows acceptable internal consistency and construct validity. This research underscores the need for multidimensional measures of reproductive empowerment to capture this nuanced process.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144236838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
People, Rights, and Choices: Keeping the Promise of the ICPD Programme of Action Alive 人、权利和选择:履行人发会议行动纲领的承诺
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70017
Saumya RamaRao, Priscilla Idele, Dakshitha Wickremarathene
{"title":"People, Rights, and Choices: Keeping the Promise of the ICPD Programme of Action Alive","authors":"Saumya RamaRao, Priscilla Idele, Dakshitha Wickremarathene","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144193172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Undesired Births, Contraception, and Abortion Before and After the Cairo Consensus: Trends in Conditional Undesired Birth Rates and the Impact of Contraception and Abortion. 《开罗共识前后的意外生育、避孕和堕胎:有条件意外出生率的趋势以及避孕和堕胎的影响》。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70014
Jonathan Marc Bearak, Ellie Leong, Jewel Gausman, Jessica Rosenberg, Mariah Menanno, Samira Sackietey, Octavia Mulhern, Vladimíra Kantorová, Joseph Molitoris

The Programme of Action adopted after the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), and later the Beijing Declaration, affirmed commitments to the human right to decide on the number and spacing of one's children and have the information and means to do so. In this study, we estimate trends related to this component of reproductive agency-undesired births per thousand women who want to avoid pregnancy, the conditional undesired birth rate-with annual rates for five-year periods from 1975 to 2024. Worldwide, 36 million undesired births occurred annually in 2020-2024 compared to 45 million annually in 1990-1994, corresponding to a decrease in rate from 61 to 32. Had it not been for increases in contraceptive use since 1990-1994, the global average rate in 2020-2024 would have been 36 percent higher than it actually was. Had it not been for increasing proportions of pregnancies aborted, the rate would have been 58 percent higher. Comparing regional averages, excepting Sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania, the pace of decline in conditional undesired birth rates slowed by the 2000s; hence, the global average rate decreased by 22 percent in the latter half of the post-ICPD period after declining by 31 percent and 33 percent during the 15-year periods immediately before and after ICPD.

在国际人口与发展会议(人发会议)之后通过的《行动纲领》以及后来的《北京宣言》申明了对决定子女数目和生育间隔以及拥有这样做的信息和手段的人权的承诺。在这项研究中,我们估计了与生殖机构这一组成部分相关的趋势——每千名想要避免怀孕的妇女的意外生育,有条件的意外出生率——从1975年到2024年的五年期间的年增长率。在世界范围内,2020-2024年每年发生3600万例意外生育,而1990-1994年每年发生4500万例,相当于比率从61降至32。如果没有1990-1994年以来避孕药具使用的增加,2020-2024年的全球平均使用率将比实际水平高出36%。如果不是因为流产的比例越来越高,这一比例可能会高出58%。比较区域平均值,除撒哈拉以南非洲和大洋洲外,有条件非预期生育率的下降速度在2000年代有所放缓;因此,在人发会议前后的15年期间分别下降了31%和33%之后,全球平均增长率在人发会议后的后半期下降了22%。
{"title":"Undesired Births, Contraception, and Abortion Before and After the Cairo Consensus: Trends in Conditional Undesired Birth Rates and the Impact of Contraception and Abortion.","authors":"Jonathan Marc Bearak, Ellie Leong, Jewel Gausman, Jessica Rosenberg, Mariah Menanno, Samira Sackietey, Octavia Mulhern, Vladimíra Kantorová, Joseph Molitoris","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/sifp.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Programme of Action adopted after the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), and later the Beijing Declaration, affirmed commitments to the human right to decide on the number and spacing of one's children and have the information and means to do so. In this study, we estimate trends related to this component of reproductive agency-undesired births per thousand women who want to avoid pregnancy, the conditional undesired birth rate-with annual rates for five-year periods from 1975 to 2024. Worldwide, 36 million undesired births occurred annually in 2020-2024 compared to 45 million annually in 1990-1994, corresponding to a decrease in rate from 61 to 32. Had it not been for increases in contraceptive use since 1990-1994, the global average rate in 2020-2024 would have been 36 percent higher than it actually was. Had it not been for increasing proportions of pregnancies aborted, the rate would have been 58 percent higher. Comparing regional averages, excepting Sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania, the pace of decline in conditional undesired birth rates slowed by the 2000s; hence, the global average rate decreased by 22 percent in the latter half of the post-ICPD period after declining by 31 percent and 33 percent during the 15-year periods immediately before and after ICPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":"274-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144111900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights and Global Development. 性健康和生殖健康及权利与全球发展。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70016
Gilda Sedgh, Susheela Singh, Irum Taqi, Jonathan Wittenberg

The ICPD Programme of Action and the Sustainable Development Goals both underscore the essential role of sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in development. Despite significant progress on many aspects of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), challenges remain, and they are exacerbated by rising anti-rights movements in many countries. At a time when SRHR is under threat, it is important to surface evidence that speaks to its critical role in development and its inextricable connections to multiple global goals. In this commentary, we argue that investing in SRHR is strategic because it yields substantial benefits to individuals, economies, societies, the environment, and peace and security, and thus contributes to progress on related goals. We encourage SRHR advocates to leverage the broad array of arguments to bolster decision-makers' and other stakeholders' support of SRHR, alongside the well-established arguments grounded in cost-effectiveness, and returns on health and human rights. With the world falling short of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and conservative forces threatening to undo the progress that has been made, urgent and collective action on multiple fronts is needed. By recognizing that many development priorities are interconnected, we can accelerate progress through cross-movement advocacy and mobilization.

《人发会议行动纲领》和可持续发展目标都强调了性健康和生殖健康以及生殖权利在发展中的重要作用。尽管在性健康和生殖健康及权利的许多方面取得了重大进展,但挑战依然存在,许多国家反权利运动的兴起加剧了这些挑战。在SRHR受到威胁的时候,重要的是提供证据,说明其在发展中的关键作用及其与多个全球目标的不可分割的联系。在本评论中,我们认为,投资于SRHR具有战略意义,因为它为个人、经济、社会、环境以及和平与安全带来了巨大利益,从而有助于实现相关目标。我们鼓励性健康和人力资源倡导者利用广泛的论据,加强决策者和其他利益攸关方对性健康和人力资源的支持,以及基于成本效益和健康与人权回报的既定论据。由于世界距离实现可持续发展目标还很遥远,保守势力有可能使已经取得的进展毁于一旦,因此需要在多个方面采取紧急集体行动。认识到许多发展优先事项是相互关联的,我们可以通过跨运动的宣传和动员加速进展。
{"title":"Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights and Global Development.","authors":"Gilda Sedgh, Susheela Singh, Irum Taqi, Jonathan Wittenberg","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1111/sifp.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ICPD Programme of Action and the Sustainable Development Goals both underscore the essential role of sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in development. Despite significant progress on many aspects of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), challenges remain, and they are exacerbated by rising anti-rights movements in many countries. At a time when SRHR is under threat, it is important to surface evidence that speaks to its critical role in development and its inextricable connections to multiple global goals. In this commentary, we argue that investing in SRHR is strategic because it yields substantial benefits to individuals, economies, societies, the environment, and peace and security, and thus contributes to progress on related goals. We encourage SRHR advocates to leverage the broad array of arguments to bolster decision-makers' and other stakeholders' support of SRHR, alongside the well-established arguments grounded in cost-effectiveness, and returns on health and human rights. With the world falling short of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and conservative forces threatening to undo the progress that has been made, urgent and collective action on multiple fronts is needed. By recognizing that many development priorities are interconnected, we can accelerate progress through cross-movement advocacy and mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":"232-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144128759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Capitalizing on Population Dynamics 30 Years on from the International Conference on Population and Development. 利用国际人口与发展会议30年来的人口动态。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70004
Stuart Gietel-Basten,Rachel Snow
The world is grappling with a huge array of demographic challenges-ranging from rapid population growth in sub-Saharan Africa to rapid aging and decline elsewhere-with profound implications for social systems, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. We examine the complex interplay of demographic diversity and other global megatrends, emphasizing the urgent need for policies that prioritize human rights and sustainable development. The legacy of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) is re-evaluated, highlighting the principles that advocate for individual reproductive rights over numerical targets. Rather than solely focusing on population numbers, we underscore the necessity of addressing root causes of apparent demographic challenges and inequalities, especially relating to gender equality, access to quality health care (including sexual and reproductive health services), and education. By integrating insights on aging populations, migration, and climate change, we call for a shift toward inclusive, rights-based policies that harness the potential of all individuals, in which sexual and reproductive health and rights are central. Ultimately, we suggest that progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals and implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action can only be achieved through tailored demographic policies that reflect the unique contexts of each country, fostering resilience and well-being in a demographically diverse world.
世界正在努力应对一系列巨大的人口挑战——从撒哈拉以南非洲的人口快速增长到其他地区的快速老龄化和人口下降——这些挑战对社会制度、经济稳定和环境可持续性产生了深远的影响。我们研究了人口多样性与其他全球大趋势之间复杂的相互作用,强调迫切需要制定优先考虑人权和可持续发展的政策。重新评价了1994年国际人口与发展会议(人发会议)的遗产,强调了主张个人生殖权利高于数字指标的原则。我们不只是关注人口数量,而是强调必须解决明显的人口挑战和不平等现象的根源,特别是在性别平等、获得优质保健(包括性健康和生殖健康服务)和教育方面。通过综合对人口老龄化、移徙和气候变化的见解,我们呼吁转向包容性的、基于权利的政策,发挥所有人的潜力,其中性健康和生殖健康及权利是核心。最后,我们建议,在实现可持续发展目标和执行《人发会议行动纲领》方面取得进展,只能通过有针对性的人口政策来实现,这些政策应反映每个国家的独特情况,在人口多样化的世界中培养复原力和福祉。
{"title":"Capitalizing on Population Dynamics 30 Years on from the International Conference on Population and Development.","authors":"Stuart Gietel-Basten,Rachel Snow","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70004","url":null,"abstract":"The world is grappling with a huge array of demographic challenges-ranging from rapid population growth in sub-Saharan Africa to rapid aging and decline elsewhere-with profound implications for social systems, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. We examine the complex interplay of demographic diversity and other global megatrends, emphasizing the urgent need for policies that prioritize human rights and sustainable development. The legacy of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) is re-evaluated, highlighting the principles that advocate for individual reproductive rights over numerical targets. Rather than solely focusing on population numbers, we underscore the necessity of addressing root causes of apparent demographic challenges and inequalities, especially relating to gender equality, access to quality health care (including sexual and reproductive health services), and education. By integrating insights on aging populations, migration, and climate change, we call for a shift toward inclusive, rights-based policies that harness the potential of all individuals, in which sexual and reproductive health and rights are central. Ultimately, we suggest that progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals and implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action can only be achieved through tailored demographic policies that reflect the unique contexts of each country, fostering resilience and well-being in a demographically diverse world.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144065746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I Was Confident From the Bottom of My Heart That I Will be Fine With These Medicines": Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making Around Self-Managed Abortion Trajectories in India. “我发自内心地相信这些药物对我很好”:对印度自我管理堕胎轨迹决策的定性分析。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70015
Caila Brander,Caitlin McKenna,Caitlin Gerdts,Balasubramanian Palanisamy,Anoop Jain,Laura Jacobson,Katherine Key,Sruthi Chandrasekaran,Ruvani Jayaweera
While the incidence of self-managed abortion (SMA) in India is well-documented, why the majority of abortions in India are self-managed remains largely unanswered. This qualitative study explores factors that contribute to decision-making about SMA in India. Between January and August 2022, we conducted 43 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed abortions across six Indian states, recruiting via accredited social health activists, clinic sampling frames, and social media posts. Underpinned by the Coast et al. framework, we coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis and then organized factors that contributed to people's decision-making around SMA versus facility-based care. Contributing factors to people's decisions not to seek facility-based abortion care included concerns about poor treatment by providers, the unaffordability of private facility care, and fear of procedural abortion methods. Factors contributing to people's decision to seek SMA included having prior SMA experience, access to information about SMA, affordability, privacy, accessibility, and convenience. SMA is a valued option for abortion seekers in India due to perceived benefits and a desire to avoid facility-based care. Our findings highlight the need for improved person-centered abortion care at facilities and offer potential avenues for developing supportive resources for people who self-manage abortion in India.
虽然印度的自我管理堕胎(SMA)发生率有充分的记录,但为什么印度的大多数堕胎都是自我管理的,这在很大程度上仍然没有答案。本定性研究探讨了影响印度SMA决策的因素。在2022年1月至8月期间,我们通过认可的社会健康活动家、诊所抽样框架和社交媒体帖子,对印度6个邦的自我管理堕胎的人进行了43次深度访谈。在Coast等人框架的基础上,我们使用主题分析对转录本进行编码和分析,然后组织影响人们围绕SMA和基于设施的护理做出决策的因素。导致人们决定不去医院堕胎的因素包括:对医疗服务提供者治疗不良的担忧、私人医院护理的负担不起以及对手术流产方法的恐惧。影响人们决定寻求SMA的因素包括是否有SMA的经验、是否能获得SMA的信息、可负担性、隐私性、可及性和便利性。SMA是印度寻求堕胎者的一个有价值的选择,因为它有明显的好处,并且希望避免以设施为基础的护理。我们的研究结果强调了在设施中改进以人为中心的堕胎护理的必要性,并为印度自我管理堕胎的人提供了开发支持性资源的潜在途径。
{"title":"\"I Was Confident From the Bottom of My Heart That I Will be Fine With These Medicines\": Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making Around Self-Managed Abortion Trajectories in India.","authors":"Caila Brander,Caitlin McKenna,Caitlin Gerdts,Balasubramanian Palanisamy,Anoop Jain,Laura Jacobson,Katherine Key,Sruthi Chandrasekaran,Ruvani Jayaweera","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70015","url":null,"abstract":"While the incidence of self-managed abortion (SMA) in India is well-documented, why the majority of abortions in India are self-managed remains largely unanswered. This qualitative study explores factors that contribute to decision-making about SMA in India. Between January and August 2022, we conducted 43 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed abortions across six Indian states, recruiting via accredited social health activists, clinic sampling frames, and social media posts. Underpinned by the Coast et al. framework, we coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis and then organized factors that contributed to people's decision-making around SMA versus facility-based care. Contributing factors to people's decisions not to seek facility-based abortion care included concerns about poor treatment by providers, the unaffordability of private facility care, and fear of procedural abortion methods. Factors contributing to people's decision to seek SMA included having prior SMA experience, access to information about SMA, affordability, privacy, accessibility, and convenience. SMA is a valued option for abortion seekers in India due to perceived benefits and a desire to avoid facility-based care. Our findings highlight the need for improved person-centered abortion care at facilities and offer potential avenues for developing supportive resources for people who self-manage abortion in India.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143982427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures 在性健康和生殖健康、权利和正义中定位男性:过去、现在和未来
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-09 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70003
Joe Strong, Ernestina Coast, Malvern Chiweshe
Since the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, global policies, and agenda‐setting milestones have emphasized that universal sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are unattainable without the meaningful engagement and inclusion of men. Despite this, the field of SRHR continues to struggle with how and in what ways men can and should be included in research, programs, and policies. In this commentary, we argue that the programmatic focus of SRHR limits the capacity to produce the data and evidence needed to inform gender transformational change. For men to be meaningfully engaged with by SRHR, researchers need an analytic lens that can capture the manifestations and outcomes of gender and power. We consider the conceptual complementarities between two theoretical frameworks: hegemonic masculinities and Reproductive Justice. We contend that bringing together these conceptual approaches to men and SRHR offers an analytic framework to iterate and innovate approaches to research. Such changes will allow for a greater interrogation of gender and power and the production of data and evidence necessary to grapple with the ongoing injustices that curtail people's sexual and reproductive freedoms.
自1994年国际人口与发展会议以来,全球政策和议程设定里程碑都强调,如果没有男性的有意义参与和包容,就无法实现普遍的性健康和生殖健康及权利。尽管如此,SRHR领域仍在努力解决男性如何以及以何种方式可以和应该被纳入研究、项目和政策的问题。在这篇评注中,我们认为,性别和社会事务高级专员的规划重点限制了为性别转型变革提供信息所需的数据和证据的能力。为了让男性有意义地参与到SRHR中,研究人员需要一个能够捕捉性别和权力的表现和结果的分析镜头。我们考虑了两个理论框架之间概念上的互补性:霸权男性主义和生殖正义。我们认为,将这些概念性方法结合在一起,为男性和SRHR提供了一个分析框架,以迭代和创新研究方法。这些变化将允许对性别和权力进行更大的讯问,并提供必要的数据和证据,以应对持续存在的限制人们性和生殖自由的不公正现象。
{"title":"Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures","authors":"Joe Strong, Ernestina Coast, Malvern Chiweshe","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70003","url":null,"abstract":"Since the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, global policies, and agenda‐setting milestones have emphasized that universal sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are unattainable without the meaningful engagement and inclusion of men. Despite this, the field of SRHR continues to struggle with how and in what ways men can and should be included in research, programs, and policies. In this commentary, we argue that the programmatic focus of SRHR limits the capacity to produce the data and evidence needed to inform gender transformational change. For men to be meaningfully engaged with by SRHR, researchers need an analytic lens that can capture the manifestations and outcomes of gender and power. We consider the conceptual complementarities between two theoretical frameworks: hegemonic masculinities and Reproductive Justice. We contend that bringing together these conceptual approaches to men and SRHR offers an analytic framework to iterate and innovate approaches to research. Such changes will allow for a greater interrogation of gender and power and the production of data and evidence necessary to grapple with the ongoing injustices that curtail people's sexual and reproductive freedoms.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143930879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Big Data and AI in Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Comment 性与生殖健康中的大数据与人工智能:评论
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70005
Mahesh Karra, Saumya RamaRao
Big data and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to transform sexual and reproductive health (SRH), offering new avenues to enhance access, efficiency, and personalization in healthcare. AI‐driven tools can provide opportunities to improve service delivery and optimize resource allocation. Through data‐driven insights, healthcare providers can better understand population trends, predict health risks, and tailor interventions for diverse communities, ultimately advancing gender equality and empowerment. However, the integration of AI into SRH also presents significant challenges. Ethical concerns such as informed consent, data privacy, and transparency are critical to ensuring that AI applications do not violate individual autonomy and rights. The digital divide—disparities in technology access between different regions and populations—further risks exacerbating inequalities in SRH services and the provision of care. Moreover, there is a need for robust governance frameworks and global data protection laws to regulate the use of AI in SRH, and in healthcare more broadly. Programs and policies must focus on bridging these gaps, emphasizing equity and ethical considerations while leveraging AI's potential to enhance SRH services and support the vision of SRH and rights for all.
大数据和人工智能(AI)有可能改变性健康和生殖健康(SRH),为提高医疗保健的可及性、效率和个性化提供新的途径。人工智能驱动的工具可以为改善服务提供和优化资源分配提供机会。通过数据驱动的洞察,医疗保健提供者可以更好地了解人口趋势,预测健康风险,并为不同社区量身定制干预措施,最终促进性别平等和赋权。然而,将人工智能集成到SRH中也面临着重大挑战。知情同意、数据隐私和透明度等伦理问题对于确保人工智能应用不会侵犯个人自主权和权利至关重要。数字鸿沟——不同地区和人群在获取技术方面的差距——进一步加剧了性健康和生殖健康服务和提供护理方面的不平等。此外,需要建立健全的治理框架和全球数据保护法,以规范人工智能在性健康和生殖健康以及更广泛的医疗保健领域的使用。计划和政策必须侧重于弥合这些差距,强调公平和道德考虑,同时利用人工智能的潜力来加强性健康和生殖健康服务,并支持性健康和生殖健康愿景和所有人的权利。
{"title":"Big Data and AI in Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Comment","authors":"Mahesh Karra, Saumya RamaRao","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70005","url":null,"abstract":"Big data and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to transform sexual and reproductive health (SRH), offering new avenues to enhance access, efficiency, and personalization in healthcare. AI‐driven tools can provide opportunities to improve service delivery and optimize resource allocation. Through data‐driven insights, healthcare providers can better understand population trends, predict health risks, and tailor interventions for diverse communities, ultimately advancing gender equality and empowerment. However, the integration of AI into SRH also presents significant challenges. Ethical concerns such as informed consent, data privacy, and transparency are critical to ensuring that AI applications do not violate individual autonomy and rights. The digital divide—disparities in technology access between different regions and populations—further risks exacerbating inequalities in SRH services and the provision of care. Moreover, there is a need for robust governance frameworks and global data protection laws to regulate the use of AI in SRH, and in healthcare more broadly. Programs and policies must focus on bridging these gaps, emphasizing equity and ethical considerations while leveraging AI's potential to enhance SRH services and support the vision of SRH and rights for all.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143905700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproductive Autonomy in Fertility Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review. 撒哈拉以南非洲生育研究中的生殖自主:范围审查。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70012
Billie de Haas,Allen Kabagenyi,Syifasari Diennabila
Fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa regularly indicates the need to increase women's reproductive autonomy. However, individual, female-focused conceptualizations of reproductive autonomy tend to neglect the power dynamics both internal and external to couples and other intimate relationships that shape a woman's reproductive autonomy. Furthermore, they disregard the reproductive autonomy of men and other subpopulations and partners in intimate relationships. To identify gaps and evaluate the applicability of the concept, this scoping review clarifies how reproductive autonomy has been assessed and applied in fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible for inclusion were empirical peer-reviewed publications, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, published since 1994. Out of 1568 articles screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were quantitative in nature and focused mainly on the reproductive autonomy of women. Our key finding is that the reproductive autonomy of partners in intimate relationships, and of women in particular, is restricted at the community level in order to preserve the status quo of social power structures in society. In line with a reproductive justice approach, more research should focus on the reproductive autonomy of vulnerable and understudied populations as well as on the interpersonal and contextual dynamics that suppress reproductive autonomy in communal settings.
撒哈拉以南非洲的生育研究经常表明需要提高妇女的生育自主权。然而,个体的、以女性为中心的生殖自主概念往往忽视了塑造女性生殖自主的夫妻和其他亲密关系的内部和外部权力动态。此外,它们无视男性和其他亚群以及亲密关系中的伴侣的生殖自主权。为了确定差距并评估这一概念的适用性,本范围审查澄清了如何在撒哈拉以南非洲的生育研究中评估和应用生殖自主。符合纳入条件的是1994年以来发表的经验性同行评审出版物,包括定量、定性和混合方法研究。在筛选的1568篇文章中,有18篇符合纳入标准。大多数出版物都是数量性质的,主要集中于妇女的生育自主权。我们的主要发现是,亲密关系中的伴侣,特别是妇女的生殖自主权在社区一级受到限制,以维持社会权力结构的现状。根据生殖正义的方法,更多的研究应该集中在脆弱和研究不足的人口的生殖自主,以及在公共环境中抑制生殖自主的人际和环境动态。
{"title":"Reproductive Autonomy in Fertility Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Billie de Haas,Allen Kabagenyi,Syifasari Diennabila","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70012","url":null,"abstract":"Fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa regularly indicates the need to increase women's reproductive autonomy. However, individual, female-focused conceptualizations of reproductive autonomy tend to neglect the power dynamics both internal and external to couples and other intimate relationships that shape a woman's reproductive autonomy. Furthermore, they disregard the reproductive autonomy of men and other subpopulations and partners in intimate relationships. To identify gaps and evaluate the applicability of the concept, this scoping review clarifies how reproductive autonomy has been assessed and applied in fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible for inclusion were empirical peer-reviewed publications, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, published since 1994. Out of 1568 articles screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were quantitative in nature and focused mainly on the reproductive autonomy of women. Our key finding is that the reproductive autonomy of partners in intimate relationships, and of women in particular, is restricted at the community level in order to preserve the status quo of social power structures in society. In line with a reproductive justice approach, more research should focus on the reproductive autonomy of vulnerable and understudied populations as well as on the interpersonal and contextual dynamics that suppress reproductive autonomy in communal settings.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Women, Girls, and the Climate Crisis: Advancing Reproductive Health and Rights and Gender Equality in Climate Policies at ICPD+30 妇女、女童与气候危机:在人发会议+30上推进生殖健康和权利以及气候政策中的性别平等
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.70006
Angela Baschieri, Chiagozie Udeh, Zainab Yunusa, Rachel Snow
The climate crisis will have an impact on everyone, everywhere, affecting both present and future generations, but there are unique ways in which the crisis is impacting the lives of women and girls. This commentary reviews growing evidence on the effects of climate change on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and gender‐based violence (GBV), illustrating how the crisis is augmenting preexisting gender inequalities. Far greater attention to SRHR and GBV is needed within climate actions to ensure the fulfillment of the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and a sustainable future for women and girls.
气候危机将对每一个人、每一个地方产生影响,影响今世后代,但这场危机正以独特的方式影响妇女和女童的生活。本评论回顾了关于气候变化对性健康和生殖健康及权利(SRHR)以及基于性别的暴力(GBV)的影响的越来越多的证据,说明了这场危机如何加剧了先前存在的性别不平等。在气候行动中需要更多地关注性别暴力和性别暴力,以确保实现《国际人口与发展会议行动纲领》和妇女和女孩的可持续未来。
{"title":"Women, Girls, and the Climate Crisis: Advancing Reproductive Health and Rights and Gender Equality in Climate Policies at ICPD+30","authors":"Angela Baschieri, Chiagozie Udeh, Zainab Yunusa, Rachel Snow","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70006","url":null,"abstract":"The climate crisis will have an impact on everyone, everywhere, affecting both present and future generations, but there are unique ways in which the crisis is impacting the lives of women and girls. This commentary reviews growing evidence on the effects of climate change on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and gender‐based violence (GBV), illustrating how the crisis is augmenting preexisting gender inequalities. Far greater attention to SRHR and GBV is needed within climate actions to ensure the fulfillment of the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and a sustainable future for women and girls.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143905814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Studies in Family Planning
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1