Surgery最新文献

Background: Unfavorable intraoperative findings or incidents during minimally invasive liver surgery may necessitate conversion to open surgery. This study aimed to identify predictors for conversion in minimally invasive liver surgery and gain insight into outcomes following conversions.

Methods: This nationwide, retrospective cohort study compared converted and non-converted minimally invasive liver surgery procedures using data from 20 centers in the Dutch Hepatobiliary Audit (2014-2022). Propensity score matching was applied. Subgroup analyses of converted robotic liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection and emergency versus non-emergency conversions were performed. Predictors for conversions were identified using backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Of 3,530 patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (792 robotic liver resection, 2,738 laparoscopic liver resection), 408 (11.6%) were converted (4.9% robotic liver resection, 13.5% laparoscopic liver resection). Conversion was associated with increased blood loss (580 mL [interquartile range 250-1,200] vs 200 mL [interquartile range 50-500], P < .001), major blood loss (≥500 mL, 58.8% vs 26.7%, P < .001), intensive care admission (19.0% vs 8.4%, P = .005), overall morbidity (38.9% vs 21.0%, P < .001), severe morbidity (17.9% vs 9.6%, P = .002), and a longer hospital stay (6 days [interquartile range 5-8] vs 4 days [interquartile range 2-5], P < .001) but not mortality (2.2% vs 1.2%, P = .387). Emergency conversions had increased intraoperative blood loss (1,500 mL [interquartile range 700-2,800] vs 525 mL [interquartile range 208-1,000], P < .001), major blood loss (87.5% vs 59.3%, P = .005), and intensive care admission (27.9% vs 10.6%, P = .029), compared with non-emergency conversions. Robotic liver resection was linked to lower conversion risk, whereas American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥3, larger lesion size, concurrent ablation, technically major, and anatomically major resections were risk factors.

Conclusion: Both emergency and non-emergency conversions negatively impact perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive liver surgery. Robotic liver resection reduces conversion risk compared to laparoscopic liver resection.

Background: Postoperative acute kidney injury is associated with an increase in hospital length of stay and mortality. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fluid management may contribute to acute kidney injury. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between intraoperative duration of hypotension with adverse events after laparoscopic liver resection.

Methods: A prospective cohort including adult patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection between January 2010 and June 2022. Cumulative time below mean arterial blood pressure thresholds and association with major adverse events composing of postoperative acute kidney injury (≤2 days) and complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3a) ≤30 days were assessed.

Results: In 360 patients, the median age was 61 years, 206 (57%) were male, median body mass index was 26.3, and 129 (36%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute kidney injury was recorded in 3 (0.8%) patients as stage 1, 6 (1.7%) patients as stage 2, and 7 (1.9%) patients as stage 3. Major adverse events occurred in 31 (8.6%) patients, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 mL. On continuous analysis, a threshold <60 mmHg at ≥15 minutes was found for major adverse events. The mean arterial blood pressure <55 mmHg for ≥20 minutes was associated with an increased risk of major adverse events (odds ratio 7.72; P < .001). In patients with >15 minutes of mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg, higher intravenous volume was associated with increase in major adverse events (P = .045), whereas adjusted intravenous volume was not associated with major adverse events (P = .657), acute kidney injury (P = .681), or blood loss (P = .875).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe procedure with a low risk of acute kidney injury. After ≥15 minutes at mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg, the risk of major adverse events increases. Greater intravenous fluid infusion volume was associated with an observed risk for major adverse events, suggesting that mean arterial blood pressure should be managed by vasoactive agents.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of intraoperative nerve monitoring at decreasing vocal fold movement impairment in children undergoing at-risk procedures.

Background: Children undergoing aerodigestive or cardiovascular procedures are at risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, leading to vocal fold movement impairment. Although intraoperative nerve monitoring has been shown to decrease recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults, there is paucity of data in children.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study of children who underwent airway, esophageal, or great vessel surgery between 2018 and 2023. Vocal fold movement impairment was evaluated with pre- and postoperative awake flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Vocal fold movement impairment rates and associated characteristics were compared between those with and without intraoperative nerve monitoring.

Results: Among 387 children undergoing 426 at-risk procedures, intraoperative nerve monitoring was used in 72.1% (n = 307) of procedures. Intraoperative nerve monitoring significantly reduced postoperative vocal fold movement impairment compared with those without (11.4% vs 20.2%, P = .019, 43.6% relative risk reduction, number needed to treat: 12). In children with a pre-existing vocal fold movement impairment (n = 79, 18.5%), intraoperative nerve monitoring provided enhanced protection (vocal fold movement impairment 7.8% with intraoperative nerve monitoring compared with 25% without, P = .046, 68.6% relative risk reduction, number needed to treat: 3). Bilateral vocal fold movement impairment was 14 times more likely without intraoperative nerve monitoring (1.8% overall, 0.3% with intraoperative nerve monitoring, 5.6% without; 95% confidence interval 1.6-123.2; P = .006). Increasing intraoperative nerve monitoring use correlated with decreasing vocal fold movement impairment rates year over year (P = .046). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated intraoperative nerve monitoring to remain significantly associated with reduced risk of vocal fold movement impairment (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.85; P = .013).

Conclusion: Intraoperative nerve monitoring in children seems effective at decreasing recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and consequently vocal fold movement impairment. Intraoperative nerve monitoring should be considered in children undergoing cervicothoracic or cardiothoracic procedures, especially in those with preoperative vocal fold movement impairment.

Objective: For patients with non-small cell lung cancer, microscopic residual disease (R1) is sometimes inevitable after sleeve lobectomy. However, the necessity for extensive pneumonectomy after sleeve lobectomy with R1 status remains unclear, especially when the patient cannot tolerate surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 366 patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy for microscopic residual disease (SLobR1) or pneumonectomy between 2015 and 2019 at Shanghai Chest Hospital, China. We used propensity score matching to balance the baseline characteristics between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups and then analyzed the survival outcomes (overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results: Propensity score matching balanced the baseline characteristics, resulting in 93 patients per group. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups. However, the subgroup analysis indicated that residual disease negatively affected early stage I disease in the SLobR1 group compared with the pneumonectomy group. In addition, the causes of death did not differ between the groups. Moreover, radiotherapy improved overall survival (P = .021) and considerably decreased the incidence of distant recurrence, similar to other studies. However, it increased the risk of extrathoracic lymph node metastasis.

Conclusion: Palliative SLobR1 is acceptable, especially for patients who cannot tolerate extensive pneumonectomy. Furthermore, radiotherapy is necessary to reduce the recurrence risk.

Aims: Whether rotation of a diverting loop ileostomy during rectal cancer surgery, for reducing the catastrophic effect of an anastomotic leakage, affects the incidence of small-bowel obstruction has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study is to explore whether technical maneuvers in diverting loop ileostomy creation, including its rotation, are associated with increased incidence of small-bowel obstruction in rectal tumor surgery.

Methods: This multicenter prospective study was conducted by the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, which comprises 24 major institutions. Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma scheduled for laparoscopic/robotic low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with a diverting loop ileostomy were included. A total of 451 patients were prospectively enrolled between July 2015 and April 2021. The primary endpoint was the relevance of loop ileostomy rotation to the incidence of small-bowel obstruction; the secondary endpoints included the origin of the small-bowel obstruction and length of hospital stay.

Results: Small-bowel obstruction was observed in 10.8% in the nonrotated group and 12.3% in the rotated group, with no significant difference (P > .99). The only risk factor identified for small-bowel obstruction was distance from the ileocecal valve, with a significant difference in 16 patients (7.3%) with a distance of ≤30 cm and 16 patients (15.4%) in a distance of >30 cm (P = .028).

Conclusion: Rotation of the diverting loop ileostomy had no significant effect on the incidence of small-bowel obstruction.

Background: The long-term survival rate of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has improved alongside the development of multidisciplinary treatment, and there is now demand for less invasive surgery that maintains postoperative pancreatic function. We evaluated the efficacy of pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy in terms of oncologic parameters and postoperative pancreatic function.

Methods: The data of 98 consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2022 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, and postoperative pancreatic function were compared between pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy, in which the pancreatic stump was distal to the left margin of the portal vein on postoperative computed tomography, and conventional distal pancreatectomy.

Results: Sixteen patients (16%) underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Fewer lymph nodes were dissected in the pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy group than the conventional distal pancreatectomy group (19 vs 31, respectively; P < .01); however, the R0 resection rate (94% vs 93%, respectively; P = 1.00), recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were similar. Similar results were obtained in an analysis limited to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic tail. Patients who underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy were less likely to develop worsening of their diabetes than those who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy (19% vs 39%, respectively; P = .16). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease newly developed in 22% of the patients who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy but in none of those who underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy (P = .04).

Conclusion: The pancreatic transection site should be distally located to preserve postoperative pancreatic function when R0 resection can be achieved.

Background: This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed with occult para-aortic lymph node metastasis using intraoperative para-aortic lymph node sampling.

Methods: Between January 2005 and May 2021, a total of 606 patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with intraoperative para-aortic lymph node sampling were retrospectively investigated and divided into the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative (n = 543), resected para-aortic lymph node-positive (n = 44), and unresected para-aortic lymph node-positive (n = 19) groups. Overall survival, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results: The overall survival in the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group was significantly worse than that in the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative group (3-year overall survival, 29.8% vs 48.4%, P < .001) and significantly better than that in the unresected para-aortic lymph node-positive group (3-year overall survival, 29.8% vs 0.0%, P = .008). In the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group, adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 2.689, P = .033). The overall survival of patients in the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group who received adjuvant chemotherapy was comparable to that of patients in the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative group who had 4 or more regional lymph node metastases and received adjuvant chemotherapy (3-year overall survival, 33.9% vs 34.1%, P = .343). A logistic regression analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy, age <65 years, creatinine clearance >60 mL/min, pancreatic body or tail tumor, and serum albumin level >3.5 g/dL were significant predictive factors for induction of adjuvant chemotherapy in 587 resected patients.

Conclusions: Resection may be acceptable for patients with para-aortic lymph node-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who are likely to tolerate adjuvant chemotherapy.