首页 > 最新文献

The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Gut Microbiota Richness and Diversity Track with T Cell Aging in Healthy Adults 健康成年人肠道微生物群的丰富性和多样性与 T 细胞衰老的关系
Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad276
Annelise A Madison, Christin E Burd, Rebecca Andridge, Stephanie J Wilson, Michael T Bailey, Martha Belury, Daniel J Spakowicz, William Malarkey, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Background This study examined how gut microbiota diversity and richness relate to T cell aging among 96 healthy adults of all ages. It also explored whether these links differed throughout the lifespan. Methods Peripheral blood was obtained from 96 study participants (N=96, aged 21-72) to assess mRNA markers of T cell aging (p16ink4a, p14ARF, B3gat1, Klrg1) and DNA methylation. T cell aging mRNA markers were combined into an aging index and the Horvath epigenetic clock algorithm was used to calculate epigenetic age based on DNA methylation status of over 500 loci. Participants also collected a stool sample from which the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to derive the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices, and the total count of observed operational taxonomic units (richness). Models controlled for BMI, comorbidities, sex, dietary quality, smoking status, physical activity, and sleep quality. Results Lower microbiota richness was associated with higher T cell age based on mRNA markers, but when probing the region of significance, this relationship was only significant among adults 45 years and older (p=.03). Lower Shannon diversity (p=.05) and richness (p=.07) marginally correlated with higher epigenetic age (i.e., greater T cell DNA methylation). Conclusion Gut microbiota complexity may correspond with the rate of T cell aging, especially in mid-to-late life. These results suggest an interplay between the gut microbiome and immunological aging that warrants further experimental work.
研究背景 本研究探讨了肠道微生物群的多样性和丰富度与 96 名各年龄段健康成年人的 T 细胞衰老之间的关系。研究还探讨了这些联系在整个生命周期中是否存在差异。方法 采集 96 名研究参与者(N=96,年龄 21-72 岁)的外周血,评估 T 细胞衰老的 mRNA 标记(p16ink4a、p14ARF、B3gat1、Klrg1)和 DNA 甲基化。T 细胞衰老 mRNA 标记被合并成一个衰老指数,Horvath 表观遗传时钟算法则根据 500 多个位点的 DNA 甲基化状态计算表观遗传年龄。参与者还采集了粪便样本,并对其中的 16S rRNA 基因 V4 区域进行了测序,以得出香农和辛普森多样性指数以及观察到的操作分类单位总数(丰富度)。模型对体重指数、合并症、性别、饮食质量、吸烟状况、体力活动和睡眠质量进行了控制。结果 根据 mRNA 标记,较低的微生物群丰富度与较高的 T 细胞年龄相关,但在探究显著性区域时,这种关系仅在 45 岁及以上的成年人中显著(p=.03)。较低的香农多样性(p=.05)和丰富度(p=.07)与较高的表观遗传年龄(即较高的 T 细胞 DNA 甲基化)略有关联。结论 肠道微生物群的复杂性可能与 T 细胞的衰老速度相对应,尤其是在中晚期。这些结果表明,肠道微生物群与免疫学衰老之间存在相互作用,值得进一步开展实验研究。
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Richness and Diversity Track with T Cell Aging in Healthy Adults","authors":"Annelise A Madison, Christin E Burd, Rebecca Andridge, Stephanie J Wilson, Michael T Bailey, Martha Belury, Daniel J Spakowicz, William Malarkey, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad276","url":null,"abstract":"Background This study examined how gut microbiota diversity and richness relate to T cell aging among 96 healthy adults of all ages. It also explored whether these links differed throughout the lifespan. Methods Peripheral blood was obtained from 96 study participants (N=96, aged 21-72) to assess mRNA markers of T cell aging (p16ink4a, p14ARF, B3gat1, Klrg1) and DNA methylation. T cell aging mRNA markers were combined into an aging index and the Horvath epigenetic clock algorithm was used to calculate epigenetic age based on DNA methylation status of over 500 loci. Participants also collected a stool sample from which the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to derive the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices, and the total count of observed operational taxonomic units (richness). Models controlled for BMI, comorbidities, sex, dietary quality, smoking status, physical activity, and sleep quality. Results Lower microbiota richness was associated with higher T cell age based on mRNA markers, but when probing the region of significance, this relationship was only significant among adults 45 years and older (p=.03). Lower Shannon diversity (p=.05) and richness (p=.07) marginally correlated with higher epigenetic age (i.e., greater T cell DNA methylation). Conclusion Gut microbiota complexity may correspond with the rate of T cell aging, especially in mid-to-late life. These results suggest an interplay between the gut microbiome and immunological aging that warrants further experimental work.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138822706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Incomplete Model of Disability: Discrepancies Between Performance-Based and Self-Reported Measures of Functioning 不完整的残疾模型:基于表现的功能测量与自我报告的功能测量之间的差异
Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad271
Erica Twardzik, Jennifer A Schrack, Vicki A Freedman, Nicholas S Reed, Joshua R Ehrlich, Pablo Martinez-Amezcua
Background Appropriate conceptualization and measurement of disability are critical for population-focused resource allocation and policy development. Self-reported and performance-based measures of functioning have been used to represent disability. Variation in environmental context or self-perception of ability may influence self-reports; however, performance-based measures that attempt to control environmental context may not accurately capture real-world aspects of functioning. This study examined the agreement between self-report and performance-based measures of functioning within four domains among older adults. Methods Cross-sectional data from the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study was used. Self-reported and performance-based measures of functioning were assessed for vision, hearing, mobility, and memory domains. We examined the diagnostic characteristics of performance-based vs. self-reported measures using sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics curves. Differences in the agreement of these measures across sociodemographic groups was investigated using logistic regression. Results Among 2,442 respondents 71 years and older (mean 78.5 ±5.3, 56% female), performance measures of hearing and mobility had high sensitivity (89% and 91%, respectively) and low/moderate specificity (36% and 63%, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of vision measures were 71%. Memory measures had high specificity (89%) and low sensitivity (28%). Performance-based discrimination ranged from 0.59 (memory) to 0.78 (mobility). Agreement varied across sociodemographic factors. Conclusions Performance measures diverge from self-reported functioning among older adults. Discordance may reveal opportunities for environmental intervention where participants' performance does not capture the full extent of barriers in the daily lives. Additional research is needed to investigate individual and environmental factors which could explain the observed differences.
背景 对残疾进行适当的概念化和测量,对于以人口为重点的资源分配和政策制定至关重要。人们使用自我报告和基于表现的功能测量来表示残疾。环境背景或自我认知能力的差异可能会影响自我报告;然而,试图控制环境背景的基于表现的测量方法可能无法准确捕捉功能的真实世界方面。本研究考察了老年人自我报告和基于表现的功能测量在四个领域中的一致性。方法 采用 2021 年全国健康与老龄化趋势研究的横断面数据。对视力、听力、行动能力和记忆力进行了自我报告和基于表现的功能测量评估。我们使用灵敏度、特异性和接收器操作特征曲线来检验基于表现的测量与自我报告的测量的诊断特征。我们还使用逻辑回归法研究了不同社会人口组别在这些测量结果一致性方面的差异。结果 在 2 442 名 71 岁及以上的受访者中(平均 78.5 ±5.3,56% 为女性),听力和行动能力的绩效测量具有较高的灵敏度(分别为 89% 和 91%)和较低/中等的特异性(分别为 36% 和 63%)。视力测量的灵敏度和特异性均为 71%。记忆测量的特异性较高(89%),灵敏度较低(28%)。基于表现的区分度从 0.59(记忆力)到 0.78(行动能力)不等。不同的社会人口学因素所产生的一致性也不同。结论 老年人的表现测量与自我报告的功能存在差异。这种不一致可能揭示了环境干预的机会,因为参与者的表现并不能完全反映日常生活中的障碍。还需要进行更多的研究,以调查可能解释观察到的差异的个人和环境因素。
{"title":"An Incomplete Model of Disability: Discrepancies Between Performance-Based and Self-Reported Measures of Functioning","authors":"Erica Twardzik, Jennifer A Schrack, Vicki A Freedman, Nicholas S Reed, Joshua R Ehrlich, Pablo Martinez-Amezcua","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad271","url":null,"abstract":"Background Appropriate conceptualization and measurement of disability are critical for population-focused resource allocation and policy development. Self-reported and performance-based measures of functioning have been used to represent disability. Variation in environmental context or self-perception of ability may influence self-reports; however, performance-based measures that attempt to control environmental context may not accurately capture real-world aspects of functioning. This study examined the agreement between self-report and performance-based measures of functioning within four domains among older adults. Methods Cross-sectional data from the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study was used. Self-reported and performance-based measures of functioning were assessed for vision, hearing, mobility, and memory domains. We examined the diagnostic characteristics of performance-based vs. self-reported measures using sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics curves. Differences in the agreement of these measures across sociodemographic groups was investigated using logistic regression. Results Among 2,442 respondents 71 years and older (mean 78.5 ±5.3, 56% female), performance measures of hearing and mobility had high sensitivity (89% and 91%, respectively) and low/moderate specificity (36% and 63%, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of vision measures were 71%. Memory measures had high specificity (89%) and low sensitivity (28%). Performance-based discrimination ranged from 0.59 (memory) to 0.78 (mobility). Agreement varied across sociodemographic factors. Conclusions Performance measures diverge from self-reported functioning among older adults. Discordance may reveal opportunities for environmental intervention where participants' performance does not capture the full extent of barriers in the daily lives. Additional research is needed to investigate individual and environmental factors which could explain the observed differences.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"252 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138564958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporal Patterns of Change in Physical and Cognitive Performance 身体和认知能力变化的时间模式
Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad274
Pankaja Desai, Shannon Halloway, Kristin Krueger, Kumar B Rajan, Denis Evans
Background This study examined the relation between declines in physical and cognitive performance in older people. Method A population-based cohort of 7483 adults (average age 72 years) were interviewed. Physical performance was assessed with three standardized tests and a combination of four cognitive tests was used to assess cognitive function. Rate of change in physical and cognitive performance was determined for each interval between interviews. In mixed effects linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and study time, and change in each factor was used to predict change in the other factor. We examined time associations by using change in the predictor measured one, two or three intervals before the outcome change. Results Decline in cognitive function was most strongly predicted by physical decline in the same 3-year interval. The decline in cognitive function was weaker in the one-time interval after the decline in physical function and was not significant in later intervals. When a decline in cognitive function was used to predict a decline in physical function, the results were similar. The strongest association occurred in the same time interval so that declines in cognitive and physical performance tend to occur together. Conclusion Decline in cognition and physical function seem to occur together in a short timeframe. It is important to investigate the reasons for these changes that are short-term to guide the development of interventions.
背景 本研究探讨了老年人体能和认知能力下降之间的关系。方法 对 7483 名成年人(平均年龄 72 岁)进行了人群调查。采用三种标准化测试评估体能,并结合四种认知测试评估认知功能。在每次访谈之间的间隔时间内,确定体能和认知能力的变化率。在混合效应线性回归模型中,对年龄、性别、种族和学习时间进行了调整,并用每个因素的变化来预测其他因素的变化。我们利用结果变化前一个、两个或三个时间间隔测量的预测因子的变化来研究时间关联。结果 同一个 3 年间隔期内,身体机能下降对认知功能下降的预测最强。在身体机能下降后的一个时间间隔内,认知功能下降的程度较弱,而在随后的时间间隔内,认知功能下降的程度并不显著。如果用认知功能的下降来预测身体功能的下降,结果也类似。最强的关联出现在同一时间间隔内,因此认知能力和身体机能的下降往往会同时出现。结论 认知能力和身体机能的下降似乎在短时间内同时出现。研究这些短期变化的原因对于指导干预措施的制定非常重要。
{"title":"Temporal Patterns of Change in Physical and Cognitive Performance","authors":"Pankaja Desai, Shannon Halloway, Kristin Krueger, Kumar B Rajan, Denis Evans","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad274","url":null,"abstract":"Background This study examined the relation between declines in physical and cognitive performance in older people. Method A population-based cohort of 7483 adults (average age 72 years) were interviewed. Physical performance was assessed with three standardized tests and a combination of four cognitive tests was used to assess cognitive function. Rate of change in physical and cognitive performance was determined for each interval between interviews. In mixed effects linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and study time, and change in each factor was used to predict change in the other factor. We examined time associations by using change in the predictor measured one, two or three intervals before the outcome change. Results Decline in cognitive function was most strongly predicted by physical decline in the same 3-year interval. The decline in cognitive function was weaker in the one-time interval after the decline in physical function and was not significant in later intervals. When a decline in cognitive function was used to predict a decline in physical function, the results were similar. The strongest association occurred in the same time interval so that declines in cognitive and physical performance tend to occur together. Conclusion Decline in cognition and physical function seem to occur together in a short timeframe. It is important to investigate the reasons for these changes that are short-term to guide the development of interventions.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"176 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138564983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geriatric Assessment Impairment Profiles and Mortality in Older Adults with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Latent Class Analysis of the CARE Registry 患有胃肠道癌症的老年人的老年评估损伤特征与死亡率:CARE 登记的潜类分析
Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad273
Sydney T Thai, Jennifer L Lund, Kelly M Kenzik, Charles Poole, Til Stürmer, John B Buse, Christian A Harmon, Mustafa Al-Obaidi, Grant R Williams
Background Many older adults with cancer have ≥2 impairments on geriatric assessment which impacts present and future frailty status, treatment tolerability, and outcomes. Our objective was to identify and describe distinct geriatric assessment impairment classes using latent class analysis (LCA) in older patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and assess 1-year mortality. Methods We used the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Study, a registry of older adults (≥60 years) at University of Alabama at Birmingham. The analytic cohort included patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who completed a self-administered geriatric assessment (CARE tool) before chemotherapy and had ≥1 geriatric assessment impairment. Thirteen geriatric assessment impairments were used as indicators in LCA. Resultant classes were described, mortality was estimated, and risk contrasts (differences, hazard ratios) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. For comparison, estimates were provided for frailty categories (robust, pre-frail, frail) determined from 44 items in the CARE tool. Stratified analyses included high-risk (pancreatic, hepatobiliary, esophageal) vs. low-risk gastrointestinal cancers, and stage (IV vs. I-III). Results Six geriatric assessment impairment classes were identified: Mild impairment (LC1); Social support impairment (LC2); Weight loss alone (LC3); Impaired, low anxiety/depression (LC4); Impaired with anxiety/depression (LC5); Global impairment (LC6). One-year mortality was 14%, 22%, 29%, 34%, 50% and 50% for LC1-LC6, respectively. For frailty categories, estimates ranged from 18% (robust) to 40% (frail). In stratified analyses, LC4-LC6 consistently had higher mortality estimates compared to LC1 Conclusions The 6 geriatric assessment impairment classes showed a wider spread of mortality estimates compared to frailty categories and could be used to identify vulnerable patients and to plan interventions.
背景 许多患有癌症的老年人在老年评估方面有≥2项损伤,这影响了他们现在和将来的虚弱状态、治疗耐受性和预后。我们的目的是利用潜类分析法(LCA)在老年胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者中识别和描述不同的老年评估损伤等级,并评估 1 年死亡率。方法 我们使用了阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校的老年人(≥60 岁)登记资料--癌症与amp;衰老复原力评估(CARE)研究。分析队列包括胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者,这些患者在化疗前完成了自我老年评估(CARE 工具),并且有≥1 项老年评估障碍。13 项老年评估损伤被用作 LCA 的指标。对结果等级进行了描述,对死亡率进行了估算,并计算了风险对比(差异、危险比)和 95% 的置信区间。为了进行比较,还提供了根据 CARE 工具中 44 个项目确定的虚弱类别(强壮、前期虚弱、虚弱)的估计值。分层分析包括高风险(胰腺癌、肝胆癌、食管癌)与低风险胃肠道癌症以及分期(IV期与I-III期)。结果 确定了六个老年评估损伤等级:轻度损伤(LC1);社会支持损伤(LC2);单纯体重减轻(LC3);低焦虑/抑郁损伤(LC4);焦虑/抑郁损伤(LC5);全面损伤(LC6)。LC1-LC6 的一年死亡率分别为 14%、22%、29%、34%、50% 和 50%。对于虚弱类别,估计值从 18%(强壮)到 40%(虚弱)不等。在分层分析中,与 LC1 相比,LC4-LC6 的死亡率估计值一直较高。
{"title":"Geriatric Assessment Impairment Profiles and Mortality in Older Adults with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Latent Class Analysis of the CARE Registry","authors":"Sydney T Thai, Jennifer L Lund, Kelly M Kenzik, Charles Poole, Til Stürmer, John B Buse, Christian A Harmon, Mustafa Al-Obaidi, Grant R Williams","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad273","url":null,"abstract":"Background Many older adults with cancer have ≥2 impairments on geriatric assessment which impacts present and future frailty status, treatment tolerability, and outcomes. Our objective was to identify and describe distinct geriatric assessment impairment classes using latent class analysis (LCA) in older patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and assess 1-year mortality. Methods We used the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Study, a registry of older adults (≥60 years) at University of Alabama at Birmingham. The analytic cohort included patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who completed a self-administered geriatric assessment (CARE tool) before chemotherapy and had ≥1 geriatric assessment impairment. Thirteen geriatric assessment impairments were used as indicators in LCA. Resultant classes were described, mortality was estimated, and risk contrasts (differences, hazard ratios) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. For comparison, estimates were provided for frailty categories (robust, pre-frail, frail) determined from 44 items in the CARE tool. Stratified analyses included high-risk (pancreatic, hepatobiliary, esophageal) vs. low-risk gastrointestinal cancers, and stage (IV vs. I-III). Results Six geriatric assessment impairment classes were identified: Mild impairment (LC1); Social support impairment (LC2); Weight loss alone (LC3); Impaired, low anxiety/depression (LC4); Impaired with anxiety/depression (LC5); Global impairment (LC6). One-year mortality was 14%, 22%, 29%, 34%, 50% and 50% for LC1-LC6, respectively. For frailty categories, estimates ranged from 18% (robust) to 40% (frail). In stratified analyses, LC4-LC6 consistently had higher mortality estimates compared to LC1 Conclusions The 6 geriatric assessment impairment classes showed a wider spread of mortality estimates compared to frailty categories and could be used to identify vulnerable patients and to plan interventions.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138559186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations of folate/folic acid supplementation alone and in combination with other B vitamins on dementia risk and brain structure: evidence from 466,224 UK Biobank participants 单独补充叶酸或叶酸与其他B族维生素与痴呆风险和大脑结构的关系:来自466,224名英国生物银行参与者的证据
Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad266
Yitong Ling, Shiqi Yuan, Xiaxuan Huang, Shanyuan Tan, Hongtao Cheng, Anding Xu, Jun Lyu
Previous researchers have tried to explore the association between folate/folic acid intake and dementia incidence, but the results remain controversial. We evaluated the associations of folate/folic acid supplementation alone and in combination with other B vitamins on dementia risk and brain structure. A total of 466,224 UK Biobank participants were investigated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between folate/folic acid supplementation status and the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD). Multivariable linear regression models were employed to evaluate the association between folate/folic acid supplementation status and brain structure. In the final model, folate/folic acid supplementation alone was significantly associated with a higher risk of AD (hazard ratio [HR] =1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.06 to 1.69, p=0.015) and VD (HR=1.61, 95% CI=1.21 to 2.13, p=0.001). Folate/folic acid supplementation alone was associated with a reduction in the hippocampus (β= -95.25 mm3, 95% CI= -165.31 to -25.19 mm3, p=0.014) and amygdala (β= -51.85 mm3, 95% CI= -88.02 to -15.68 mm3, p=0.012). The risk of AD and VD, as well as brain structure, in the group with combined folate/folic acid supplementation and other B vitamins did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the reference group (all p>0.05). Folate/folic acid supplementation alone is significantly associated with a higher risk of AD and VD, as well as adverse alterations in brain structure. However, when combined with other B vitamins, these detrimental effects can be counteracted.
以前的研究人员试图探索叶酸摄入与痴呆发病率之间的关系,但结果仍然存在争议。我们评估了叶酸/叶酸单独补充和与其他B族维生素联合补充与痴呆风险和大脑结构的关系。共有466,224名英国生物银行参与者接受了调查。采用Cox比例风险模型评估叶酸/叶酸补充状况与阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VD)风险之间的关系。采用多变量线性回归模型评估叶酸/叶酸补充状况与大脑结构之间的关系。在最终模型中,单独补充叶酸与AD(风险比[HR] =1.34, 95%可信区间[CI] =1.06至1.69,p=0.015)和VD (HR=1.61, 95% CI=1.21至2.13,p=0.001)的高风险显著相关。单独补充叶酸与海马(β= -95.25 mm3, 95% CI= -165.31至-25.19 mm3, p=0.014)和杏仁核(β= -51.85 mm3, 95% CI= -88.02至-15.68 mm3, p=0.012)的减少有关。与对照组相比,叶酸/叶酸和其他B族维生素联合补充组AD和VD的风险以及大脑结构没有统计学差异(均p>0.05)。单独补充叶酸与AD和VD的高风险以及大脑结构的不良改变显著相关。然而,当与其他B族维生素结合使用时,这些有害影响可以抵消。
{"title":"Associations of folate/folic acid supplementation alone and in combination with other B vitamins on dementia risk and brain structure: evidence from 466,224 UK Biobank participants","authors":"Yitong Ling, Shiqi Yuan, Xiaxuan Huang, Shanyuan Tan, Hongtao Cheng, Anding Xu, Jun Lyu","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad266","url":null,"abstract":"Previous researchers have tried to explore the association between folate/folic acid intake and dementia incidence, but the results remain controversial. We evaluated the associations of folate/folic acid supplementation alone and in combination with other B vitamins on dementia risk and brain structure. A total of 466,224 UK Biobank participants were investigated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between folate/folic acid supplementation status and the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD). Multivariable linear regression models were employed to evaluate the association between folate/folic acid supplementation status and brain structure. In the final model, folate/folic acid supplementation alone was significantly associated with a higher risk of AD (hazard ratio [HR] =1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.06 to 1.69, p=0.015) and VD (HR=1.61, 95% CI=1.21 to 2.13, p=0.001). Folate/folic acid supplementation alone was associated with a reduction in the hippocampus (β= -95.25 mm3, 95% CI= -165.31 to -25.19 mm3, p=0.014) and amygdala (β= -51.85 mm3, 95% CI= -88.02 to -15.68 mm3, p=0.012). The risk of AD and VD, as well as brain structure, in the group with combined folate/folic acid supplementation and other B vitamins did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the reference group (all p>0.05). Folate/folic acid supplementation alone is significantly associated with a higher risk of AD and VD, as well as adverse alterations in brain structure. However, when combined with other B vitamins, these detrimental effects can be counteracted.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"103 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138455372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1