Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-26DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00645-2
Heng Li, Wei-Chen Chen, Nelson Lu, Rong Tang, Yu Zhao
{"title":"The Elusiveness of the Win Ratio Parameter in the Presence of Missing Data.","authors":"Heng Li, Wei-Chen Chen, Nelson Lu, Rong Tang, Yu Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00645-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43441-024-00645-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-29DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00658-x
Tanya Symons, Anne Woollett, John Zalcberg, Lisa Eckstein
Implementation of decentralized approaches can improve access to clinical trials. The Australian government has focused on a teletrial model, which resources and upskills health care organisations to enable collaboration in trials to extend to rural and remote areas. This commentary describes the Australian teletrial model, its context within the established DCT model, its value, and likely challenges moving forward.
{"title":"Implementing Decentralized Clinical Trials in Australia through Teletrials: Where to From Here?","authors":"Tanya Symons, Anne Woollett, John Zalcberg, Lisa Eckstein","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00658-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00658-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation of decentralized approaches can improve access to clinical trials. The Australian government has focused on a teletrial model, which resources and upskills health care organisations to enable collaboration in trials to extend to rural and remote areas. This commentary describes the Australian teletrial model, its context within the established DCT model, its value, and likely challenges moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-24DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00657-y
H. Podhaisky
{"title":"Digital Health Technology (DHT) in European Clinical Trials, How to Improve the Status-Quo of the Regulatory Landscape?","authors":"H. Podhaisky","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00657-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00657-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140665275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0
Akio Maki, M. Narukawa
{"title":"Factors Associated with Inclusion of Japan in Phase I Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology.","authors":"Akio Maki, M. Narukawa","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140670220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00656-z
Yimei Li, Robert Nelson, Rima Izem, K. Broglio, R. Mundayat, Margaret Gamalo, Yansong Wen, Haitao Pan, Hengrui Sun, Jingjing Ye
{"title":"Unlocking the Potential: A Systematic Review of Master Protocol in Pediatrics.","authors":"Yimei Li, Robert Nelson, Rima Izem, K. Broglio, R. Mundayat, Margaret Gamalo, Yansong Wen, Haitao Pan, Hengrui Sun, Jingjing Ye","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00656-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00656-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140670280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-22DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00650-5
Martin Gebel, Cheryl Renz, Lisa Rodriguez, Arianna Simonetti, Hong Yang, Brian Edwards, James Matthew Higginson, Nicola Charpentier, Michael Colopy
{"title":"A Survey to Assess the Current Status of Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment in the Global Drug and Medical Device Industry.","authors":"Martin Gebel, Cheryl Renz, Lisa Rodriguez, Arianna Simonetti, Hong Yang, Brian Edwards, James Matthew Higginson, Nicola Charpentier, Michael Colopy","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00650-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00650-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140677254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00637-2
Hadir Aljohani, Fares S. Alrubaish, Waad M. Alghamdi, Fawaz Al-Harbi
Background
Linagliptin is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase DPP‐4 inhibitor, which is indicated for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy or add-on to therapy with other hypoglycemic drugs.
Objectives
We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety of linagliptin focusing on cardiovascular risks among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search across the following databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of linagliptin compared to placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes were included. The primary safety points were cardiovascular (CV) adverse events including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), CV death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina. While, secondary safety points included 17 reported adverse events such as infections, hypoglycemia and abdominal pain. Three reviewers independently screened and reviewed each study to extract relevant information. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We conducted a meta-analysis using the random effects model. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) of targeted adverse events with linagliptin compared to placebo were estimated using the Mantel–Haenszel test.
Results
A total of 24 studies with 19,981 adult patients were included. There was no difference in the incidence of all CV adverse events or individual CV adverse events between linagliptin and the placebo arms. The pooled estimate of the risk of upper respiratory tract infection was reported in twelve trials with a 38% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45–0.85, and I2 = 0%), while no difference was found in other infections. For gastrointestinal disorders, the risk of abdominal pain showed a 65% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16–0.77, and I2 = 0%).
Conclusion
Our study showed an overall acceptable safety profile of linagliptin in patients with T2DM. Moreover, our study showed a risk reduction of upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain when using linagliptin compared to placebo.
{"title":"Safety of Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials","authors":"Hadir Aljohani, Fares S. Alrubaish, Waad M. Alghamdi, Fawaz Al-Harbi","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00637-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00637-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Linagliptin is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase DPP‐4 inhibitor, which is indicated for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy or add-on to therapy with other hypoglycemic drugs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety of linagliptin focusing on cardiovascular risks among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic search across the following databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of linagliptin compared to placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes were included. The primary safety points were cardiovascular (CV) adverse events including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), CV death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina. While, secondary safety points included 17 reported adverse events such as infections, hypoglycemia and abdominal pain. Three reviewers independently screened and reviewed each study to extract relevant information. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We conducted a meta-analysis using the random effects model. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) of targeted adverse events with linagliptin compared to placebo were estimated using the Mantel–Haenszel test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 24 studies with 19,981 adult patients were included. There was no difference in the incidence of all CV adverse events or individual CV adverse events between linagliptin and the placebo arms<i>.</i> The pooled estimate of the risk of upper respiratory tract infection was reported in twelve trials with a 38% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45–0.85, and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while no difference was found in other infections. For gastrointestinal disorders, the risk of abdominal pain showed a 65% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16–0.77, and I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study showed an overall acceptable safety profile of linagliptin in patients with T2DM. Moreover, our study showed a risk reduction of upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain when using linagliptin compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140609623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00641-6
James Signorovitch, Jialu Zhang, David Brown, Preston Dunnmon, Liang Xiu, Nicolae Done, Kristen Hsu, Yolanda Barbachano, Isabelle Lousada
Immunoglobin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease in which a plasma cell dyscrasia leads to deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in multiple organs. To facilitate development of new therapies for this heterogenous disease, a public–private partnership was formed between the nonprofit Amyloidosis Research Consortium and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In 2020, the Amyloidosis Forum launched an initiative to identify clinical trial endpoints and analytic strategies across affected organ systems and life impacts via specialized working groups. This review summarizes the proceedings of the Statistical Group and proposes a pathway for development and validation of multi-domain endpoints (MDEs) for potential use in AL amyloidosis clinical trials. Specifically, drawing on candidate domain-specific endpoints recommended by each organ-specific working group, different approaches to constructing MDEs were considered. Future studies were identified to assess the validity, meaningfulness and performance of MDEs through use of natural history and clinical trial data. Ultimately, for drug development, the context of use in a regulatory evaluation, the specific patient population, and the investigational therapeutic mechanism should drive selection of appropriate endpoints. MDEs for AL amyloidosis, once developed and validated, will provide important options for advancing patient-focused drug development in this multi-system disease.
免疫球蛋白轻链(AL)淀粉样变性是一种罕见疾病,浆细胞发育不良会导致不溶性淀粉样纤维沉积在多个器官中。为了促进这种异质性疾病新疗法的开发,非营利性淀粉样变性研究联合会与美国食品和药物管理局药物评估和研究中心建立了公私合作伙伴关系。2020 年,淀粉样变性论坛发起了一项倡议,通过专门的工作组确定临床试验终点和分析策略,涵盖受影响的器官系统和生命影响。本综述总结了统计小组的会议记录,并提出了开发和验证多领域终点(MDEs)的途径,以便在 AL 淀粉样变性临床试验中使用。具体来说,根据各器官特异性工作组推荐的候选领域特异性终点,考虑了构建多领域终点的不同方法。通过使用自然病史和临床试验数据,确定了未来评估 MDEs 的有效性、意义和性能的研究。归根结底,在药物开发过程中,监管评估的使用环境、特定的患者群体和研究治疗机制应推动适当终点的选择。AL 淀粉样变性的 MDE 一旦开发出来并通过验证,将为推进这种多系统疾病的以患者为中心的药物开发提供重要选择。
{"title":"Pathway for Development and Validation of Multi-domain Endpoints for Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis","authors":"James Signorovitch, Jialu Zhang, David Brown, Preston Dunnmon, Liang Xiu, Nicolae Done, Kristen Hsu, Yolanda Barbachano, Isabelle Lousada","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00641-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00641-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Immunoglobin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease in which a plasma cell dyscrasia leads to deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in multiple organs. To facilitate development of new therapies for this heterogenous disease, a public–private partnership was formed between the nonprofit Amyloidosis Research Consortium and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In 2020, the Amyloidosis Forum launched an initiative to identify clinical trial endpoints and analytic strategies across affected organ systems and life impacts via specialized working groups. This review summarizes the proceedings of the Statistical Group and proposes a pathway for development and validation of multi-domain endpoints (MDEs) for potential use in AL amyloidosis clinical trials. Specifically, drawing on candidate domain-specific endpoints recommended by each organ-specific working group, different approaches to constructing MDEs were considered. Future studies were identified to assess the validity, meaningfulness and performance of MDEs through use of natural history and clinical trial data. Ultimately, for drug development, the context of use in a regulatory evaluation, the specific patient population, and the investigational therapeutic mechanism should drive selection of appropriate endpoints. MDEs for AL amyloidosis, once developed and validated, will provide important options for advancing patient-focused drug development in this multi-system disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140609622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-16DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00653-2
Mohammed Alnuhait, Abdullah Alshammari, Manar Alharbi, Lina Alotaibi, Reem Alharbi, Attiah Khobrani, Nora Alkhudair, Majed Alshamrani, Abdullah M. Alrajhi
{"title":"Correction: Comparative Assessment of Drug Lag for Approved Oncology Targeted Therapies Between Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union","authors":"Mohammed Alnuhait, Abdullah Alshammari, Manar Alharbi, Lina Alotaibi, Reem Alharbi, Attiah Khobrani, Nora Alkhudair, Majed Alshamrani, Abdullah M. Alrajhi","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00653-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00653-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140568488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}