Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-04-20DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213
Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi
Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on in vivo large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) in vivo large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.
临界大小骨缺损(CSBD)是一项重大的临床挑战,刺激研究人员寻求成功的骨重建新方法。本系统综述的目的是评估骨髓干细胞(BMSC)与组织工程支架相结合是否在大型临床前动物模型中改善了CSBD的骨再生。根据以下纳入标准,对电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)进行了集中于体内大型动物研究的搜索,确定了10篇文章:(1)具有节段性骨缺损的体内大型动物模型;(2) 组织工程支架与骨髓基质干细胞联合治疗;(3) 对照组的存在;以及(4)组织学分析结果的最小值。动物研究:使用体内实验指南的报告进行质量评估,并使用实验室动物实验系统审查中心的偏倚风险工具来定义内部有效性。结果表明,组织工程支架,无论是来自自体移植物还是同种异体移植物,当与骨髓基质干细胞结合时,都能改善骨矿化和骨形成,包括在骨愈合的重塑阶段发挥关键作用。与未处理组和单独支架组相比,接种BMSC的支架显示出再生骨的生物力学特性和微结构特性有所改善。这篇综述强调了组织工程策略在临床前大型动物模型中修复广泛骨缺损的疗效。特别是,与无细胞支架相比,使用间充质干细胞与生物支架相结合似乎是一种成功的方法。
{"title":"Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on <i>in vivo</i> large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) <i>in vivo</i> large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"457-472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9335503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226
Di Huang, Junhui Liang, Jie Yang, Chunrun Yang, Xin Wang, Tianyu Dai, Thorsten Steinberg, Changzhong Li, Fei Wang
With the recent developments in tissue engineering, scientists have attempted to establish seed cells from different sources, create cell sheets through various technologies, implant them on scaffolds with various spatial structures, or load scaffolds with cytokines. These research results are very optimistic, bringing hope to the treatment of patients with uterine infertility. In this article, we reviewed articles related to the treatment of uterine infertility from the aspects of experimental treatment strategy, seed cells, scaffold application, and repair criteria so as to provide a basis for future research.
{"title":"Current Status of Tissue Regenerative Engineering for the Treatment of Uterine Infertility.","authors":"Di Huang, Junhui Liang, Jie Yang, Chunrun Yang, Xin Wang, Tianyu Dai, Thorsten Steinberg, Changzhong Li, Fei Wang","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the recent developments in tissue engineering, scientists have attempted to establish seed cells from different sources, create cell sheets through various technologies, implant them on scaffolds with various spatial structures, or load scaffolds with cytokines. These research results are very optimistic, bringing hope to the treatment of patients with uterine infertility. In this article, we reviewed articles related to the treatment of uterine infertility from the aspects of experimental treatment strategy, seed cells, scaffold application, and repair criteria so as to provide a basis for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"558-573"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9661547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-05-02DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040
YiFei Ma, Xiangzhen Yan
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is an important surgical method for periodontal regeneration. By placing barrier membrane on the root surface of the tooth to guide the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells, periodontal tissue regeneration can be achieved. This review intends to analyze the current limitations of GTR membranes and to propose possible solutions for developing new ones. Limitations of current GTR membranes include nonabsorbable membranes and absorbable synthetic polymer membranes exhibit weak biocompatibility; when applying to a large defect wound, the natural collagen membrane with fast degradation rate have limited mechanical strength, and the barrier function may not be maintained well. Although the degradation time can be prolonged after cross-linking, it may cause foreign body reaction and affect tissue integration; The clinical operation of current barrier membranes is inconvenient. In addition, most of the barrier membranes lack bioactivity and will not actively promote periodontal tissue regeneration. Possible solutions include using electrospinning (ELS) techniques, nanofiber scaffolds, or developing functional gradient membranes to improve their biocompatibility; adding Mg, Zn, and/or other metal alloys, or using 3D printing technology to improve their mechanical strength; increasing the concentration of nanoparticles or using directional arrangement of membrane fibers to control the fiber diameter and porosity of the membrane, which can improve their barrier function; mixing natural and synthetic polymers as well as other biomaterials with different degradation rates in proportion to change the degradation rate and maintain barrier function; to improve the convenience of clinical operation, barrier membranes that meets personalized adhesion to the wound defect can be manufactured; developing local controlled release drug delivery systems to improve their bioactivity. Impact statement This review provides an up-to-date summary of commonly commercial periodontal guided tissue regeneration membranes, and analyze their limitations in clinical use. Using studies published recently to explore possible solutions from several perspectives and to raise possible strategies in the future. Several strategies have tested in vivo/in vitro, which will guide the way to propel clinical translation, meeting clinical needs.
{"title":"Periodontal Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes: Limitations and Possible Solutions for the Bottleneck Analysis.","authors":"YiFei Ma, Xiangzhen Yan","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is an important surgical method for periodontal regeneration. By placing barrier membrane on the root surface of the tooth to guide the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells, periodontal tissue regeneration can be achieved. This review intends to analyze the current limitations of GTR membranes and to propose possible solutions for developing new ones. Limitations of current GTR membranes include nonabsorbable membranes and absorbable synthetic polymer membranes exhibit weak biocompatibility; when applying to a large defect wound, the natural collagen membrane with fast degradation rate have limited mechanical strength, and the barrier function may not be maintained well. Although the degradation time can be prolonged after cross-linking, it may cause foreign body reaction and affect tissue integration; The clinical operation of current barrier membranes is inconvenient. In addition, most of the barrier membranes lack bioactivity and will not actively promote periodontal tissue regeneration. Possible solutions include using electrospinning (ELS) techniques, nanofiber scaffolds, or developing functional gradient membranes to improve their biocompatibility; adding Mg, Zn, and/or other metal alloys, or using 3D printing technology to improve their mechanical strength; increasing the concentration of nanoparticles or using directional arrangement of membrane fibers to control the fiber diameter and porosity of the membrane, which can improve their barrier function; mixing natural and synthetic polymers as well as other biomaterials with different degradation rates in proportion to change the degradation rate and maintain barrier function; to improve the convenience of clinical operation, barrier membranes that meets personalized adhesion to the wound defect can be manufactured; developing local controlled release drug delivery systems to improve their bioactivity. Impact statement This review provides an up-to-date summary of commonly commercial periodontal guided tissue regeneration membranes, and analyze their limitations in clinical use. Using studies published recently to explore possible solutions from several perspectives and to raise possible strategies in the future. Several strategies have tested <i>in vivo</i>/<i>in vitro</i>, which will guide the way to propel clinical translation, meeting clinical needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"532-544"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9831852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Organoids are widely considered to be ideal in vitro models that have been widely applied in many fields, including regenerative medicine, disease research and drug screening. It is distinguished from other three-dimensional in vitro culture model systems by self-organization and sustainability in long-term culture. The three core components of organoid culture are cells, exogenous factors, and culture matrix. Due to the complexity of bone tissue, and heterogeneity of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells, it is challenging to construct organoids for modeling skeletal systems. In this study, we examine current progress in the development of skeletal system organoid culture systems and analyze the current research status of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and various potential organoid culture matrix candidates to provide cues for future research trajectory in this field. Impact Statement The emergence of organoids has brought new opportunities for the development of many biomedical fields. The bone organoid field still has much room for exploration. This review discusses the characteristics distinguishing organoids from other three-dimensional model systems and examines current progress in the organoid production of skeletal systems. In addition, based on core elements of organoid cultures, three main problems that need to be solved in bone organoid generation are further analyzed. These include the heterogeneity of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and potential organoid culture matrix candidates. This information provides direction for the future research of bone organoids.
{"title":"Organoid Culture Development for Skeletal Systems.","authors":"Jia Qing, Qian Guo, Longwei Lv, Xiao Zhang, Yunsong Liu, Boon Chin Heng, Zheng Li, Ping Zhang, Yongsheng Zhou","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0022","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organoids are widely considered to be ideal <i>in vitro</i> models that have been widely applied in many fields, including regenerative medicine, disease research and drug screening. It is distinguished from other three-dimensional <i>in vitro</i> culture model systems by self-organization and sustainability in long-term culture. The three core components of organoid culture are cells, exogenous factors, and culture matrix. Due to the complexity of bone tissue, and heterogeneity of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells, it is challenging to construct organoids for modeling skeletal systems. In this study, we examine current progress in the development of skeletal system organoid culture systems and analyze the current research status of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and various potential organoid culture matrix candidates to provide cues for future research trajectory in this field. Impact Statement The emergence of organoids has brought new opportunities for the development of many biomedical fields. The bone organoid field still has much room for exploration. This review discusses the characteristics distinguishing organoids from other three-dimensional model systems and examines current progress in the organoid production of skeletal systems. In addition, based on core elements of organoid cultures, three main problems that need to be solved in bone organoid generation are further analyzed. These include the heterogeneity of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and potential organoid culture matrix candidates. This information provides direction for the future research of bone organoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"545-557"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10052426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-05-02DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190
Zhen Zhang, Yulei Mu, Huiqun Zhou, Hang Yao, Dong-An Wang
Articular cartilage defects significantly compromise the quality of life in the global population. Although many strategies are needed to repair articular cartilage, including microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, and osteochondral allograft, the therapeutic effects remain suboptimal. In recent years, with the development of cartilage tissue engineering, scientists have continuously improved the formulations of therapeutic cells, biomaterial-based scaffolds, and biological factors, which have opened new avenues for better therapeutics of cartilage lesions. This review focuses on advances in cartilage tissue engineering, particularly in preclinical trials and clinical applications, prospects, and challenges.
{"title":"Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Practice: Preclinical Trials, Clinical Applications, and Prospects.","authors":"Zhen Zhang, Yulei Mu, Huiqun Zhou, Hang Yao, Dong-An Wang","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Articular cartilage defects significantly compromise the quality of life in the global population. Although many strategies are needed to repair articular cartilage, including microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, and osteochondral allograft, the therapeutic effects remain suboptimal. In recent years, with the development of cartilage tissue engineering, scientists have continuously improved the formulations of therapeutic cells, biomaterial-based scaffolds, and biological factors, which have opened new avenues for better therapeutics of cartilage lesions. This review focuses on advances in cartilage tissue engineering, particularly in preclinical trials and clinical applications, prospects, and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"473-490"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9367155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sharing the methods and results of clinical trials with full transparency is an ethical obligation for those involved in clinical research. In this regard, ClinicalTrials.gov requires reporting of results to the registry within 1 year of completion of the trial. However, a poor result reporting rate has been pointed out, with approximately half the trial results not been reported. It has been suggested that one of the reasons behind this could be the influence of sponsors who conduct the clinical trials. In the course of our previous trend analysis on regenerative medicine for stroke (STR) using ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal site as data sources, we suspected whether the results of gene and/or cell therapy trials are poorly reported. For this reason, a multivariate analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify the factors suppressing the result reporting rate, expanding our study to four different kinds of neurological diseases and regenerative medicine as a treatment modality when small-molecule compounds and biologics were set up as controls, in addition to the sponsor type factor. As a result, we found gene and/or cell therapy (therapeutic modality) in addition to STR (disease area), trials completed in 2005-2007, and clinical phases II and IV as independent factors that suppressed the rate of reporting results to ClinicalTrials.gov. On the other hand, big pharmaceutical companies were identified as a factor that increased the reporting result rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. When we applied result reporting publications through PubMed as an index, our study data revealed that the following factors were not identified as the cause for a decrease in the reporting result rate: STR (as disease area), trials completed between 2005 and 2007, and gene/cell therapy (as treatment modality). In this context, our findings indicate that gene/cell therapy has led to the suppression of the result reporting rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. This confirmed our initial suspicion of the low result reporting rate of gene/cell therapy trials. We believe that further studies are required to elucidate the factors affecting the result reporting rate from the perspective of disease area and treatment modality. Impact Statement Several studies have addressed the poor result reporting rate of clinical trials, which still remains an issue. Regenerative medicine holds great promise for the future and the process of its practical application is expected to be challenging. Although having a limited disease area and small sample size, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to point out insufficient result reporting of clinical trials of regenerative medicine from the perspective of treatment modality. This report highlights an issue for discussing the path toward its translation through an overview of various factors in comparison with conventional treatment modalities.
{"title":"A Pilot Study on Result Reporting Rates from Clinical Trials of Regenerative Medicine.","authors":"Takaharu Negoro, Hanayuki Okura, Shigekazu Hayashi, Tsutomu Arai, Akifumi Matsuyama","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sharing the methods and results of clinical trials with full transparency is an ethical obligation for those involved in clinical research. In this regard, ClinicalTrials.gov requires reporting of results to the registry within 1 year of completion of the trial. However, a poor result reporting rate has been pointed out, with approximately half the trial results not been reported. It has been suggested that one of the reasons behind this could be the influence of sponsors who conduct the clinical trials. In the course of our previous trend analysis on regenerative medicine for stroke (STR) using ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal site as data sources, we suspected whether the results of gene and/or cell therapy trials are poorly reported. For this reason, a multivariate analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify the factors suppressing the result reporting rate, expanding our study to four different kinds of neurological diseases and regenerative medicine as a treatment modality when small-molecule compounds and biologics were set up as controls, in addition to the sponsor type factor. As a result, we found gene and/or cell therapy (therapeutic modality) in addition to STR (disease area), trials completed in 2005-2007, and clinical phases II and IV as independent factors that suppressed the rate of reporting results to ClinicalTrials.gov. On the other hand, big pharmaceutical companies were identified as a factor that increased the reporting result rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. When we applied result reporting publications through PubMed as an index, our study data revealed that the following factors were not identified as the cause for a decrease in the reporting result rate: STR (as disease area), trials completed between 2005 and 2007, and gene/cell therapy (as treatment modality). In this context, our findings indicate that gene/cell therapy has led to the suppression of the result reporting rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. This confirmed our initial suspicion of the low result reporting rate of gene/cell therapy trials. We believe that further studies are required to elucidate the factors affecting the result reporting rate from the perspective of disease area and treatment modality. Impact Statement Several studies have addressed the poor result reporting rate of clinical trials, which still remains an issue. Regenerative medicine holds great promise for the future and the process of its practical application is expected to be challenging. Although having a limited disease area and small sample size, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to point out insufficient result reporting of clinical trials of regenerative medicine from the perspective of treatment modality. This report highlights an issue for discussing the path toward its translation through an overview of various factors in comparison with conventional treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"358-368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10322412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194
Xuling Liu, Derong Zou, Yinghan Hu, Yushi He, Jiayu Lu
Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common disease that has profound impact on the health of patients, but has poor prognosis. The gold standard for the treatment of peripheral nerve defects is autologous nerve grafting; notwithstanding, due to the extremely high requirement for surgeons and medical facilities, there is great interest in developing better treatment strategies for PNI. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a noninterventional stimulation method characterized by low-intensity pulsed waves. It has good therapeutic effect on fractures, inflammation, soft tissue regeneration, and nerve regulation, and can participate in PNI repair from multiple perspectives. This review concentrates on the effects and mechanisms of LIPUS in the repair of PNI from the perspective of LIPUS stimulation of neural cells and stem cells, modulation of neurotrophic factors, signaling pathways, proinflammatory cytokines, and nerve-related molecules. In addition, the effects of LIPUS on nerve conduits are reviewed, as nerve conduits are expected to be a successful alternative treatment for PNI with the development of tissue engineering. Overall, the application advantages and prospects of LIPUS in the repair of PNI are highlighted by summarizing the effects of LIPUS on seed cells, neurotrophic factors, and nerve conduits for neural tissue engineering.
{"title":"Research Progress of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injury.","authors":"Xuling Liu, Derong Zou, Yinghan Hu, Yushi He, Jiayu Lu","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common disease that has profound impact on the health of patients, but has poor prognosis. The gold standard for the treatment of peripheral nerve defects is autologous nerve grafting; notwithstanding, due to the extremely high requirement for surgeons and medical facilities, there is great interest in developing better treatment strategies for PNI. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a noninterventional stimulation method characterized by low-intensity pulsed waves. It has good therapeutic effect on fractures, inflammation, soft tissue regeneration, and nerve regulation, and can participate in PNI repair from multiple perspectives. This review concentrates on the effects and mechanisms of LIPUS in the repair of PNI from the perspective of LIPUS stimulation of neural cells and stem cells, modulation of neurotrophic factors, signaling pathways, proinflammatory cytokines, and nerve-related molecules. In addition, the effects of LIPUS on nerve conduits are reviewed, as nerve conduits are expected to be a successful alternative treatment for PNI with the development of tissue engineering. Overall, the application advantages and prospects of LIPUS in the repair of PNI are highlighted by summarizing the effects of LIPUS on seed cells, neurotrophic factors, and nerve conduits for neural tissue engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"414-428"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9959935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp
Jason L Guo, Michael Januszyk, Michael T Longaker
{"title":"<i>Call for Special Issue Papers:</i> Artificial Intelligence in Tissue Engineering and Biology.","authors":"Jason L Guo, Michael Januszyk, Michael T Longaker","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"332-333"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9971473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157
Courtney D Johnson, Helim Aranda-Espinoza, John P Fisher
Diabetes is a disease that plagues over 463 million people globally. Approximately 40 million of these patients have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and the global incidence is increasing by up to 5% per year. T1DM is where the body's immune system attacks the pancreas, specifically the pancreatic beta cells, with antibodies to prevent insulin production. Although current treatments such as exogenous insulin injections have been successful, exorbitant insulin costs and meticulous administration present the need for alternative long-term solutions to glucose dysregulation caused by diabetes. Encapsulated islet transplantation (EIT) is a tissue-engineered solution to diabetes. Donor islets are encapsulated in a semipermeable hydrogel, allowing the diffusion of oxygen, glucose, and insulin but preventing leukocyte infiltration and antibody access to the transplanted cells. Although successful in small animal models, EIT is still far from commercial use owing to necessary long-term systemic immunosuppressants and consistent immune rejection. Most published research has focused on tailoring the characteristics of the capsule material to promote clinical viability. However, most studies have been limited in scope to biochemical changes. Current mechanobiology studies on the effect of substrate stiffness on the function of leukocytes, especially macrophages-primary foreign body response (FBR) orchestrators, show promise in tailoring a favorable response to tissue-engineered therapies such as EIT. In this review, we explore strategies to improve the clinical viability of EIT. A brief overview of the immune system, the FBR, and current biochemical approaches will be elucidated throughout this exploration. Furthermore, an argument for using substrate stiffness as a capsule design parameter to increase EIT efficacy and clinical viability will be posed.
糖尿病是一种困扰全球超过 4.63 亿人的疾病。其中约有 4000 万患者患有 1 型糖尿病(T1DM),全球发病率正以每年高达 5%的速度递增。T1DM 是指人体免疫系统用抗体攻击胰腺,特别是胰腺 beta 细胞,阻止胰岛素分泌。尽管外源性胰岛素注射等现有治疗方法取得了成功,但高昂的胰岛素费用和精细的用药使人们需要寻找其他长期解决方案来解决糖尿病引起的血糖失调问题。包裹胰岛移植(EIT)是一种组织工程糖尿病解决方案。捐献的胰岛被包裹在半透性水凝胶中,允许氧气、葡萄糖和胰岛素扩散,但阻止白细胞浸润和抗体进入移植细胞。虽然 EIT 在小型动物模型中取得了成功,但由于需要长期使用全身性免疫抑制剂和持续的免疫排斥反应,因此距离商业化应用还很遥远。大多数已发表的研究都集中于调整胶囊材料的特性,以提高临床可行性。然而,大多数研究的范围仅限于生化变化。目前关于基质硬度对白细胞功能影响的机械生物学研究,尤其是巨噬细胞--异物反应(FBR)的主要协调者--显示了对组织工程疗法(如 EIT)定制有利反应的前景。在这篇综述中,我们将探讨提高 EIT 临床可行性的策略。在整个探讨过程中将简要概述免疫系统、FBR 和当前的生化方法。此外,我们还将提出将基质硬度作为胶囊设计参数以提高 EIT 疗效和临床可行性的论点。
{"title":"A Case for Material Stiffness as a Design Parameter in Encapsulated Islet Transplantation.","authors":"Courtney D Johnson, Helim Aranda-Espinoza, John P Fisher","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes is a disease that plagues over 463 million people globally. Approximately 40 million of these patients have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and the global incidence is increasing by up to 5% per year. T1DM is where the body's immune system attacks the pancreas, specifically the pancreatic beta cells, with antibodies to prevent insulin production. Although current treatments such as exogenous insulin injections have been successful, exorbitant insulin costs and meticulous administration present the need for alternative long-term solutions to glucose dysregulation caused by diabetes. Encapsulated islet transplantation (EIT) is a tissue-engineered solution to diabetes. Donor islets are encapsulated in a semipermeable hydrogel, allowing the diffusion of oxygen, glucose, and insulin but preventing leukocyte infiltration and antibody access to the transplanted cells. Although successful in small animal models, EIT is still far from commercial use owing to necessary long-term systemic immunosuppressants and consistent immune rejection. Most published research has focused on tailoring the characteristics of the capsule material to promote clinical viability. However, most studies have been limited in scope to biochemical changes. Current mechanobiology studies on the effect of substrate stiffness on the function of leukocytes, especially macrophages-primary foreign body response (FBR) orchestrators, show promise in tailoring a favorable response to tissue-engineered therapies such as EIT. In this review, we explore strategies to improve the clinical viability of EIT. A brief overview of the immune system, the FBR, and current biochemical approaches will be elucidated throughout this exploration. Furthermore, an argument for using substrate stiffness as a capsule design parameter to increase EIT efficacy and clinical viability will be posed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"334-346"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10056947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-03-08DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188
Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, Danielle S W Benoit, Alayna E Loiselle
Tendon injuries disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to chronic pain, disability, and a large socioeconomic burden. Tendon injuries are prevalent; there are over 300,000 tendon repair procedures a year in the United States to address acute trauma or chronic tendinopathy. Successful restoration of function after tendon injury remains challenging clinically. Despite improvements in surgical and physical therapy techniques, the high complication rate of tendon repair procedures motivates the use of therapeutic interventions to augment healing. While many biological and tissue engineering approaches have attempted to promote scarless tendon healing, there is currently no standard clinical treatment to improve tendon healing. Moreover, the limited efficacy of systemic delivery of several promising therapeutic candidates highlights the need for tendon-specific drug delivery approaches to facilitate translation. This review article will synthesize the current state-of-the-art methods that have been used for tendon-targeted delivery through both systemic and local treatments, highlight emerging technologies used for tissue-specific drug delivery in other tissue systems, and outline future challenges and opportunities to enhance tendon healing through targeted drug delivery.
{"title":"Drug Delivery Approaches to Improve Tendon Healing.","authors":"Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, Danielle S W Benoit, Alayna E Loiselle","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tendon injuries disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to chronic pain, disability, and a large socioeconomic burden. Tendon injuries are prevalent; there are over 300,000 tendon repair procedures a year in the United States to address acute trauma or chronic tendinopathy. Successful restoration of function after tendon injury remains challenging clinically. Despite improvements in surgical and physical therapy techniques, the high complication rate of tendon repair procedures motivates the use of therapeutic interventions to augment healing. While many biological and tissue engineering approaches have attempted to promote scarless tendon healing, there is currently no standard clinical treatment to improve tendon healing. Moreover, the limited efficacy of systemic delivery of several promising therapeutic candidates highlights the need for tendon-specific drug delivery approaches to facilitate translation. This review article will synthesize the current state-of-the-art methods that have been used for tendon-targeted delivery through both systemic and local treatments, highlight emerging technologies used for tissue-specific drug delivery in other tissue systems, and outline future challenges and opportunities to enhance tendon healing through targeted drug delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"369-386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442691/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10410960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}