Organoid engineering is a rapidly expanding field that involves developing miniaturized, three-dimensional (3D) structures to mimic the architecture and function of real organs. It provides a powerful platform to investigate organ development, disease modeling, and personalized medicine. Recent advances in cell printing technology, also known as bioprinting, feature high-throughput potential, precise control, and enhanced reproducibility, enabling the deposition of living cells to generate complex, 3D biological structures. Cell printing with bioinks composed of cells and supportive biomaterials has been utilized to generate in vitro tissues and organs with intricate architectures and functionalities to investigate normal tissue morphogenesis and disease progression. The integration of cell printing technology and organoid engineering holds tremendous potential in biomedical research. Here, we summarize recent advances in cell printing technology in developing different organoid models, creating patient-specific tissue grafts, and utilizing these models and grafts in drug testing, as well as studying disease progression. Some of these bioprinted organoids have been utilized in clinical trials, highlighting the potential of cell printing technology in future applications in tissue and organ transplantation, as well as precision medicine.Impact StatementThis article summarizes recent advances in integrating cell printing technology with three-dimensional tissue culture to develop organoid models. It discusses the advantages and limitations of three bioprinting technologies used in cell and organoid printing. The review also highlights the significant potential of cell printing technology in organoid model development and its applications in biomedical research and drug screening.
{"title":"Advances of Cell Printing Technology in Organoid Engineering.","authors":"Yu-Han Ho, Yuanhong Liao, Lingni Liao, Tianjiao Mao, Yimin Guan, Ren Xu","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0048","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organoid engineering is a rapidly expanding field that involves developing miniaturized, three-dimensional (3D) structures to mimic the architecture and function of real organs. It provides a powerful platform to investigate organ development, disease modeling, and personalized medicine. Recent advances in cell printing technology, also known as bioprinting, feature high-throughput potential, precise control, and enhanced reproducibility, enabling the deposition of living cells to generate complex, 3D biological structures. Cell printing with bioinks composed of cells and supportive biomaterials has been utilized to generate <i>in vitro</i> tissues and organs with intricate architectures and functionalities to investigate normal tissue morphogenesis and disease progression. The integration of cell printing technology and organoid engineering holds tremendous potential in biomedical research. Here, we summarize recent advances in cell printing technology in developing different organoid models, creating patient-specific tissue grafts, and utilizing these models and grafts in drug testing, as well as studying disease progression. Some of these bioprinted organoids have been utilized in clinical trials, highlighting the potential of cell printing technology in future applications in tissue and organ transplantation, as well as precision medicine.Impact StatementThis article summarizes recent advances in integrating cell printing technology with three-dimensional tissue culture to develop organoid models. It discusses the advantages and limitations of three bioprinting technologies used in cell and organoid printing. The review also highlights the significant potential of cell printing technology in organoid model development and its applications in biomedical research and drug screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"tenteb20250048"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144275952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Effective wound healing hinges on a precisely orchestrated tissue remodeling process that restores both structural integrity and functionality. This review delineates the molecular mechanisms by which chitosan-based hydrogels revolutionize wound repair. Derived from natural chitin, chitosan uniquely combines robust antimicrobial, hemostatic, and biodegradable properties with the capacity to modulate critical intracellular signaling cascades-including transforming growth factor-β, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and PI3K/AKT. These dynamic interactions drive fibroblast proliferation, stimulate the strategic transition from type III to type I collagen deposition, and finely tune extracellular matrix reorganization, thereby mitigating excessive fibrosis and minimizing scar formation. Notwithstanding its considerable therapeutic promise, clinical translation of chitosan-based hydrogels is tempered by challenges in mechanical stability and controlled degradation. We propose that advanced material engineering-encompassing precision cross-linking, nanoparticle integration, and synergistic stem cell-based strategies-could surmount these limitations. This comprehensive synthesis of current molecular insights sets the stage for next-generation regenerative biomaterials, positioning chitosan-based hydrogels as a paradigm-shifting platform for achieving superior healing outcomes in complex clinical scenarios.
{"title":"Molecular Regulation of Tissue Remodeling Through Chitosan-Based Hydrogels in Wound Healing Dynamics.","authors":"Reyhaneh Molaei, Atefe Hosseinkhani, Mostafa Saberian","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0078","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective wound healing hinges on a precisely orchestrated tissue remodeling process that restores both structural integrity and functionality. This review delineates the molecular mechanisms by which chitosan-based hydrogels revolutionize wound repair. Derived from natural chitin, chitosan uniquely combines robust antimicrobial, hemostatic, and biodegradable properties with the capacity to modulate critical intracellular signaling cascades-including transforming growth factor-β, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and PI3K/AKT. These dynamic interactions drive fibroblast proliferation, stimulate the strategic transition from type III to type I collagen deposition, and finely tune extracellular matrix reorganization, thereby mitigating excessive fibrosis and minimizing scar formation. Notwithstanding its considerable therapeutic promise, clinical translation of chitosan-based hydrogels is tempered by challenges in mechanical stability and controlled degradation. We propose that advanced material engineering-encompassing precision cross-linking, nanoparticle integration, and synergistic stem cell-based strategies-could surmount these limitations. This comprehensive synthesis of current molecular insights sets the stage for next-generation regenerative biomaterials, positioning chitosan-based hydrogels as a paradigm-shifting platform for achieving superior healing outcomes in complex clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"tenteb20250078"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation is a leading cause of lower back pain, with symptoms ranging from tingling to disability. Discectomy, as the most common treatment, relieves pain and reduces inflammation, but the unrevealed defect in annulus fibrosus (AF) inevitably increases the risk of herniation as high as 21%. Repair and regeneration of AF are crucial to prevent herniation and recreate healthy IVD. Mechanical repair strategies, including suture, annulus closure device, and AF patch, often fall short in material-tissue integration and tissue regeneration. Recent developments in tissue engineering integrate biological science and material engineering, mainly through hybrid hydrogels and synthetic polymer scaffolds, showing promising effects on AF repair and regeneration. This review outlines various repair strategies and their limitations. It emphasizes the need for a holistic approach considering material selection, scaffold design, and incorporating cytokines or stem cells to improve AF repair outcomes. First, advancements in electrospinning, 3D printing, and porosity engineering will be discussed to enhance the integration of scaffolds with surrounding tissue to mimic a natural AF environment. Second, the benefits of adding cells or biofactors will be reviewed to strengthen cellular interactions, migration, and differentiation of stem cells. Finally, future research will be proposed to develop innovative, multifunctional scaffolds that complement personalized medicine while also considering the impact of mechanical stimulation and scaffold porosity on cell behavior and drug delivery for more efficient repair effects.
{"title":"Advances in Annulus Fibrosus Repair: Hybrid Scaffolds and Fabrication Techniques for Regeneration.","authors":"Mi-Li-Wu-Ye-Ti ADaLi, Mao-Dan Nie, Qiang Zhang, Yuan-Dong Li, Qing-Qing Yang, Fei Fang, Cheng-Kung Cheng","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0051","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation is a leading cause of lower back pain, with symptoms ranging from tingling to disability. Discectomy, as the most common treatment, relieves pain and reduces inflammation, but the unrevealed defect in annulus fibrosus (AF) inevitably increases the risk of herniation as high as 21%. Repair and regeneration of AF are crucial to prevent herniation and recreate healthy IVD. Mechanical repair strategies, including suture, annulus closure device, and AF patch, often fall short in material-tissue integration and tissue regeneration. Recent developments in tissue engineering integrate biological science and material engineering, mainly through hybrid hydrogels and synthetic polymer scaffolds, showing promising effects on AF repair and regeneration. This review outlines various repair strategies and their limitations. It emphasizes the need for a holistic approach considering material selection, scaffold design, and incorporating cytokines or stem cells to improve AF repair outcomes. First, advancements in electrospinning, 3D printing, and porosity engineering will be discussed to enhance the integration of scaffolds with surrounding tissue to mimic a natural AF environment. Second, the benefits of adding cells or biofactors will be reviewed to strengthen cellular interactions, migration, and differentiation of stem cells. Finally, future research will be proposed to develop innovative, multifunctional scaffolds that complement personalized medicine while also considering the impact of mechanical stimulation and scaffold porosity on cell behavior and drug delivery for more efficient repair effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"tenteb20250051"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144235324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0088
Ilva de Fátima Souza, João Paulo de Jesus Vieira, Elton Diêgo Bonifácio, Bethânia Alves de Avelar Freitas, Libardo Andres Gonzalez Torres
Solid tumors represent the most common type of cancer in humans and are classified into sarcomas, lymphomas, and carcinomas based on the originating cells. Among these, carcinomas, which arise from epithelial and glandular cells lining the body's tissues, are the most prevalent. Around the world, a significant increase in the incidence of solid tumors is observed during recent years. In this context, efforts to discover more effective cancer treatments have led to a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its components. Currently, the interactions between cancer cells and elements of the TME are being intensely investigated. Remarkable progress in research is noted, largely owing to the development of advanced in vitro models, such as tumor-on-a-chip models that assist in understanding and ultimately discovering new effective treatments for a specific type of cancer. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the TME and cancer cell components, along with the advances on tumor-on-a-chip models designed to mimic tumors, offering a perspective on the current state of the art. Recent studies using this kind of microdevices that reproduce the TME have allowed a better understanding of the cancer and its treatments. Nevertheless, current applications of this technology present some limitations that must be overcome to achieve a broad application by researchers looking for a deeper knowledge of cancer and new strategies to improve current therapies.
{"title":"The Microenvironment of Solid Tumors: Components and Current Challenges of Tumor-on-a-Chip Models.","authors":"Ilva de Fátima Souza, João Paulo de Jesus Vieira, Elton Diêgo Bonifácio, Bethânia Alves de Avelar Freitas, Libardo Andres Gonzalez Torres","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0088","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid tumors represent the most common type of cancer in humans and are classified into sarcomas, lymphomas, and carcinomas based on the originating cells. Among these, carcinomas, which arise from epithelial and glandular cells lining the body's tissues, are the most prevalent. Around the world, a significant increase in the incidence of solid tumors is observed during recent years. In this context, efforts to discover more effective cancer treatments have led to a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its components. Currently, the interactions between cancer cells and elements of the TME are being intensely investigated. Remarkable progress in research is noted, largely owing to the development of advanced <i>in vitro</i> models, such as tumor-on-a-chip models that assist in understanding and ultimately discovering new effective treatments for a specific type of cancer. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the TME and cancer cell components, along with the advances on tumor-on-a-chip models designed to mimic tumors, offering a perspective on the current state of the art. Recent studies using this kind of microdevices that reproduce the TME have allowed a better understanding of the cancer and its treatments. Nevertheless, current applications of this technology present some limitations that must be overcome to achieve a broad application by researchers looking for a deeper knowledge of cancer and new strategies to improve current therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"266-283"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meniscal damage is one of the prevalent causes of knee pain, swelling, instability, and functional compromise, frequently culminating in osteoarthritis (OA). Timely and appropriate interventions are crucial to relieve symptoms and prevent or delay the onset of OA. Contemporary surgical treatments include total or partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair, allograft meniscal transplantation, and synthetic meniscal implants, but each presents its specific limitations. Recently, regenerative medicine and tissue engineering have emerged as promising fields, offering innovative prospects for meniscal regeneration and repair. This review delineates current surgical methods, elucidating their specific indications, advantages, and disadvantages. Concurrently, it delves into state-of-the-art tissue engineering techniques aimed at the functional regenerative repair of meniscus. Recommendations for future research and clinical practice are also provided.
半月板损伤是导致膝关节疼痛、肿胀、不稳定和功能受损的主要原因之一,常常最终导致骨关节炎(OA)。及时采取适当的干预措施对于缓解症状、预防或延缓 OA 的发生至关重要。当代外科治疗方法包括半月板全部或部分切除术、半月板修复术、同种异体半月板移植术和合成半月板植入物,但每种方法都有其特定的局限性。最近,再生医学和组织工程成为前景广阔的领域,为半月板再生和修复提供了创新前景。本综述介绍了目前的手术方法,阐明了这些方法的具体适应症、优点和缺点。同时,它还深入探讨了旨在实现半月板功能性再生修复的最新组织工程技术。此外,还对未来的研究和临床实践提出了建议。
{"title":"Surgical Therapy and Tissue Engineering for Meniscal Repair.","authors":"Hao Wang, Jie Wu, Liupu Yang, Shuyun Liu, Xiang Sui, Quanyi Guo, Mingxue Chen","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0060","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meniscal damage is one of the prevalent causes of knee pain, swelling, instability, and functional compromise, frequently culminating in osteoarthritis (OA). Timely and appropriate interventions are crucial to relieve symptoms and prevent or delay the onset of OA. Contemporary surgical treatments include total or partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair, allograft meniscal transplantation, and synthetic meniscal implants, but each presents its specific limitations. Recently, regenerative medicine and tissue engineering have emerged as promising fields, offering innovative prospects for meniscal regeneration and repair. This review delineates current surgical methods, elucidating their specific indications, advantages, and disadvantages. Concurrently, it delves into state-of-the-art tissue engineering techniques aimed at the functional regenerative repair of meniscus. Recommendations for future research and clinical practice are also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"284-296"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0126
Eoin J Devoy, Erfan Jabari, George Kotsanos, Robert H Choe, John P Fisher
Bone defects because of age, trauma, and surgery, which are exacerbated by medication side effects and common diseases such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis, are a problem of epidemic scale. The present clinical standard for treating these defects includes autografts and allografts. Although both treatments can promote robust regenerative outcomes, they fail to strike a desirable balance of availability, side effect profile, consistent regenerative efficacy, and affordability. This difficulty has contributed to the rise of bone tissue engineering (BTE) as a potential avenue through which enhanced bone regeneration could be delivered. BTE is founded upon a paradigm of using biomaterials, bioactive factors, osteoblast lineage cells (ObLCs), and vascularization to cue deficient bone tissue into a state of regeneration. Despite promising preclinical results, BTE has had modest success in being translated into the clinical setting. One barrier has been the simplicity of its paradigm relative to the complexity of biological bone. Therefore, this paradigm must be critically examined and expanded to better account for this complexity. One potential avenue for this is a more detailed consideration of osteoclast lineage cells (OcLCs). Although these cells ostensibly oppose ObLCs and bone regeneration through their resorptive functions, a myriad of investigations have shed light on their potential to influence bone equilibrium in more complex ways through their interactions with both ObLCs and bone matrix. Most BTE research has not systematically evaluated their influence. Yet contrary to expectations associated with the paradigm, a selection of BTE investigations has demonstrated that this influence can enhance bone regeneration in certain contexts. In addition, much work has elucidated the role of many controllable scaffold parameters in both inhibiting and stimulating the activity of OcLCs in parallel to bone regeneration. Therefore, this review aims to detail and explore the implications of OcLCs in BTE and how they can be leveraged to improve upon the existing BTE paradigm.
{"title":"An Exploration of the Role of Osteoclast Lineage Cells in Bone Tissue Engineering.","authors":"Eoin J Devoy, Erfan Jabari, George Kotsanos, Robert H Choe, John P Fisher","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0126","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone defects because of age, trauma, and surgery, which are exacerbated by medication side effects and common diseases such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis, are a problem of epidemic scale. The present clinical standard for treating these defects includes autografts and allografts. Although both treatments can promote robust regenerative outcomes, they fail to strike a desirable balance of availability, side effect profile, consistent regenerative efficacy, and affordability. This difficulty has contributed to the rise of bone tissue engineering (BTE) as a potential avenue through which enhanced bone regeneration could be delivered. BTE is founded upon a paradigm of using biomaterials, bioactive factors, osteoblast lineage cells (ObLCs), and vascularization to cue deficient bone tissue into a state of regeneration. Despite promising preclinical results, BTE has had modest success in being translated into the clinical setting. One barrier has been the simplicity of its paradigm relative to the complexity of biological bone. Therefore, this paradigm must be critically examined and expanded to better account for this complexity. One potential avenue for this is a more detailed consideration of osteoclast lineage cells (OcLCs). Although these cells ostensibly oppose ObLCs and bone regeneration through their resorptive functions, a myriad of investigations have shed light on their potential to influence bone equilibrium in more complex ways through their interactions with both ObLCs and bone matrix. Most BTE research has not systematically evaluated their influence. Yet contrary to expectations associated with the paradigm, a selection of BTE investigations has demonstrated that this influence can enhance bone regeneration in certain contexts. In addition, much work has elucidated the role of many controllable scaffold parameters in both inhibiting and stimulating the activity of OcLCs in parallel to bone regeneration. Therefore, this review aims to detail and explore the implications of OcLCs in BTE and how they can be leveraged to improve upon the existing BTE paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"248-265"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0124
Mina Habibizadeh, Parvin Mohammadi, Roshanak Amirian, Mohammadmehdi Moradi, Mahmoudreza Moradi
The urethral reconstruction using tissue engineering is a promising approach in clinical and preclinical studies in recent years. Generally, regenerative medicine comprises cells, bioactive agents, and biomaterial scaffolds to reconstruct tissue. For the restoration of extended urethral injury are incorporated autologous grafts or flaps from the skin of the genital area, and buccal mucosa are also utilized. However, biomaterial grafts with cells or growth factors are investigated to enhance these grafts. Natural and synthetic biomaterials were investigated for preclinical studies in the form of decellularization tissues, nanofiber/microfiber, film, and foam grafts that determined safety and efficiency. In this regard, skin grafts, bladder epithelium, buccal mucosa, small intestinal submucosa, tissue-engineered buccal mucosa, and polymeric nanofibers in clinical trials were examined, and promising and diverse outcomes were acquired. Even though one of the challenges of the reconstruction of the urethra is resistance to urine pressure and its ability to be sutured, it could be solved by the proper adjustment of the physicochemical characteristics of the graft. Urethral engineering faces challenges due to necrosis caused by a lack of angiogenesis and fibrosis, which require further investigation in future studies.
{"title":"Engineered Tissues: A Bright Perspective in Urethral Obstruction Regeneration.","authors":"Mina Habibizadeh, Parvin Mohammadi, Roshanak Amirian, Mohammadmehdi Moradi, Mahmoudreza Moradi","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0124","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urethral reconstruction using tissue engineering is a promising approach in clinical and preclinical studies in recent years. Generally, regenerative medicine comprises cells, bioactive agents, and biomaterial scaffolds to reconstruct tissue. For the restoration of extended urethral injury are incorporated autologous grafts or flaps from the skin of the genital area, and buccal mucosa are also utilized. However, biomaterial grafts with cells or growth factors are investigated to enhance these grafts. Natural and synthetic biomaterials were investigated for preclinical studies in the form of decellularization tissues, nanofiber/microfiber, film, and foam grafts that determined safety and efficiency. In this regard, skin grafts, bladder epithelium, buccal mucosa, small intestinal submucosa, tissue-engineered buccal mucosa, and polymeric nanofibers in clinical trials were examined, and promising and diverse outcomes were acquired. Even though one of the challenges of the reconstruction of the urethra is resistance to urine pressure and its ability to be sutured, it could be solved by the proper adjustment of the physicochemical characteristics of the graft. Urethral engineering faces challenges due to necrosis caused by a lack of angiogenesis and fibrosis, which require further investigation in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"209-220"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141470934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0140
Zhan Su, Tan Yang, Xinze Wu, Peiran Liu, Yisimayili Nuermaimaiti, Yuxuan Ran, Peng Wang, Pinyin Cao
Cartilage tissue, encompassing hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage, and elastic cartilage, plays a pivotal role in the human body because of its unique composition, structure, and biomechanical properties. However, the inherent avascularity and limited regenerative capacity of cartilage present significant challenges to its healing following injury. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of cartilage tissue engineering, focusing on the critical components of cell sources, scaffolds, and growth factors tailored to the regeneration of each cartilage type. We explore the similarities and differences in the composition, structure, and biomechanical properties of the three cartilage types and their implications for tissue engineering. A significant emphasis is placed on innovative strategies for cartilage regeneration, including the potential for in situ transformation of cartilage types through microenvironmental manipulation, which may offer novel avenues for repair and rehabilitation. The review underscores the necessity of a nuanced approach to cartilage tissue engineering, recognizing the distinct requirements of each cartilage type while exploring the potential of transforming one cartilage type into another as a flexible and adaptive repair strategy. Through this detailed examination, we aim to broaden the understanding of cartilage tissue engineering and inspire further research and development in this promising field.
{"title":"Comparative Analysis and Regeneration Strategies for Three Types of Cartilage.","authors":"Zhan Su, Tan Yang, Xinze Wu, Peiran Liu, Yisimayili Nuermaimaiti, Yuxuan Ran, Peng Wang, Pinyin Cao","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0140","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cartilage tissue, encompassing hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage, and elastic cartilage, plays a pivotal role in the human body because of its unique composition, structure, and biomechanical properties. However, the inherent avascularity and limited regenerative capacity of cartilage present significant challenges to its healing following injury. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of cartilage tissue engineering, focusing on the critical components of cell sources, scaffolds, and growth factors tailored to the regeneration of each cartilage type. We explore the similarities and differences in the composition, structure, and biomechanical properties of the three cartilage types and their implications for tissue engineering. A significant emphasis is placed on innovative strategies for cartilage regeneration, including the potential for <i>in situ</i> transformation of cartilage types through microenvironmental manipulation, which may offer novel avenues for repair and rehabilitation. The review underscores the necessity of a nuanced approach to cartilage tissue engineering, recognizing the distinct requirements of each cartilage type while exploring the potential of transforming one cartilage type into another as a flexible and adaptive repair strategy. Through this detailed examination, we aim to broaden the understanding of cartilage tissue engineering and inspire further research and development in this promising field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"221-233"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141545303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0103
Akankshya Shradhanjali, Jayne T Wolfe, Brandon J Tefft
There is a critical need for novel approaches to translate cell therapy and regenerative medicine to clinical practice. Magnetic cell targeting with site specificity has started to open avenues in these fields as a potential therapeutic platform. Magnetic targeting is gaining popularity in the field of biomedicine due to its ability to concentrate and retain at a target site while minimizing deleterious effects at off-target sites. It is regarded as a relatively straightforward and safe approach for a wide range of therapeutic applications. This review discusses the latest advancements and approaches in magnetic cell targeting using endocytosed and surface-bound magnetic nanoparticles as well as in vivo tracking using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The most common form of magnetic nanoparticles is superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION). The biodegradable and biocompatible properties of these magnetically responsive particles and capacity for rapid endocytosis into cells make them a breakthrough in targeted therapy. This review further discusses specific applications of magnetic targeting approaches in cardiovascular tissue engineering including myocardial regeneration, therapeutic angiogenesis, and endothelialization of implantable cardiovascular devices.
{"title":"Magnetic Cell Targeting for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering.","authors":"Akankshya Shradhanjali, Jayne T Wolfe, Brandon J Tefft","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0103","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2024.0103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a critical need for novel approaches to translate cell therapy and regenerative medicine to clinical practice. Magnetic cell targeting with site specificity has started to open avenues in these fields as a potential therapeutic platform. Magnetic targeting is gaining popularity in the field of biomedicine due to its ability to concentrate and retain at a target site while minimizing deleterious effects at off-target sites. It is regarded as a relatively straightforward and safe approach for a wide range of therapeutic applications. This review discusses the latest advancements and approaches in magnetic cell targeting using endocytosed and surface-bound magnetic nanoparticles as well as <i>in vivo</i> tracking using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The most common form of magnetic nanoparticles is superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION). The biodegradable and biocompatible properties of these magnetically responsive particles and capacity for rapid endocytosis into cells make them a breakthrough in targeted therapy. This review further discusses specific applications of magnetic targeting approaches in cardiovascular tissue engineering including myocardial regeneration, therapeutic angiogenesis, and endothelialization of implantable cardiovascular devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"234-247"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223378/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141793583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-30DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0016
Tayana Takeshova, Madina Kurmanalina, Aruzhan Aitmukhanbetova, Nadiar M Mussin, Nader Tanideh, Amin Tamadon
This bibliometric analysis examined research on bioactive glass in dentistry from 2015 to 2024, identifying key trends, its impact on dental applications, and future research directions. Data were collected from Web of Science and Scopus in April 2025, focusing on studies published between 2015 and 2024 using the keywords "Dentistry" AND "Bioactive Glass." A total of 2114 studies from 706 sources were analyzed, involving 7471 authors with an average of 5.78 coauthors per article. The analysis used Web of Science and Scopus, which provide comprehensive access to peer-reviewed literature in dentistry and materials science. Prominent journals included Dental Materials, Ceramics International, Materials, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, and Journal of Dentistry. There was a notable increase in publications, with 52 articles in 2024. The average number of citations per document was 15.61, and the average document age was 4.72 years. Collaborative research, especially among Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China, the United States, and Brazil, was a significant trend. Leading institutions included the Egyptian Knowledge Bank, University of London, and King Abdulaziz University, reflecting substantial contributions from the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. Core research topics focused on bioactive glass, mechanical properties, nanoparticles, bioactivity, and hydroxyapatite. The study highlights a growing global interest in bioactive glass, particularly in relation to dentin hypersensitivity, remineralization, and tissue regeneration. The continued rise in publication volume and expansion of international collaborations underscore the vitality of this field. Emerging directions such as bone regeneration, antibacterial applications, and advancements in the mechanical performance of bioactive materials are likely to shape the trajectory of future research.Impact StatementThis bibliometric analysis highlights the growing significance of bioactive glass in dentistry, particularly in the context of remineralization, tissue regeneration, and antimicrobial protection. The increasing volume of research, highlighted by a surge in publications and international collaborations, reflects the expanding interest in bioactive glass. Prominent research areas include remineralization, hydroxyapatite applications, and mechanical properties of bioactive materials, with implications for bone regeneration and innovative dental treatments. By identifying trends and leading contributors, this study provides a foundation for future research aimed at enhancing the clinical applications and material science of bioactive glass in dentistry.
本文献计量分析研究了2015年至2024年牙科生物活性玻璃的研究,确定了主要趋势,其对牙科应用的影响以及未来的研究方向。数据于2025年4月从Web of Science和Scopus收集,重点关注2015年至2024年间发表的使用关键词“牙科”和“生物活性玻璃”的研究。共分析了来自706个来源的2114项研究,涉及7471位作者,平均每篇文章有5.78位合著者。该分析使用了Web of Science和Scopus,它们提供了全面的牙科和材料科学同行评议文献。著名期刊包括《牙科材料》、《国际陶瓷》、《材料》、《生物医学材料力学行为杂志》和《牙科杂志》。发表的文章显著增加,2024年有52篇。平均被引次数为15.61次,平均文献年龄为4.72年。合作研究,特别是沙特阿拉伯、埃及、中国、美国和巴西之间的合作研究,是一个显著的趋势。主要机构包括埃及知识银行、伦敦大学和阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学,反映了中东、欧洲和亚洲的重大贡献。核心研究课题集中在生物活性玻璃、机械性能、纳米粒子、生物活性和羟基磷灰石。该研究强调了全球对生物活性玻璃的兴趣日益增长,特别是与牙本质过敏,再矿化和组织再生有关。出版物数量的持续增长和国际合作的扩大凸显了这一领域的活力。诸如骨再生、抗菌应用和生物活性材料机械性能的进步等新兴方向可能会塑造未来研究的轨迹。该文献计量学分析强调了生物活性玻璃在牙科领域日益增长的重要性,特别是在再矿化、组织再生和抗菌保护方面。不断增加的研究数量,突出的出版物和国际合作的激增,反映了对生物活性玻璃不断扩大的兴趣。突出的研究领域包括再矿化,羟基磷灰石的应用,以及生物活性材料的机械性能,对骨再生和创新牙科治疗的影响。通过研究生物活性玻璃的发展趋势和主要贡献者,为进一步研究生物活性玻璃在牙科领域的临床应用和材料科学奠定了基础。
{"title":"Bioactive Glass in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends, Impact, and Future Directions.","authors":"Tayana Takeshova, Madina Kurmanalina, Aruzhan Aitmukhanbetova, Nadiar M Mussin, Nader Tanideh, Amin Tamadon","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0016","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2025.0016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This bibliometric analysis examined research on bioactive glass in dentistry from 2015 to 2024, identifying key trends, its impact on dental applications, and future research directions. Data were collected from Web of Science and Scopus in April 2025, focusing on studies published between 2015 and 2024 using the keywords \"Dentistry\" AND \"Bioactive Glass.\" A total of 2114 studies from 706 sources were analyzed, involving 7471 authors with an average of 5.78 coauthors per article. The analysis used Web of Science and Scopus, which provide comprehensive access to peer-reviewed literature in dentistry and materials science. Prominent journals included <i>Dental Materials</i>, <i>Ceramics International</i>, <i>Materials</i>, <i>Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials</i>, and <i>Journal of Dentistry</i>. There was a notable increase in publications, with 52 articles in 2024. The average number of citations per document was 15.61, and the average document age was 4.72 years. Collaborative research, especially among Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China, the United States, and Brazil, was a significant trend. Leading institutions included the Egyptian Knowledge Bank, University of London, and King Abdulaziz University, reflecting substantial contributions from the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. Core research topics focused on bioactive glass, mechanical properties, nanoparticles, bioactivity, and hydroxyapatite. The study highlights a growing global interest in bioactive glass, particularly in relation to dentin hypersensitivity, remineralization, and tissue regeneration. The continued rise in publication volume and expansion of international collaborations underscore the vitality of this field. Emerging directions such as bone regeneration, antibacterial applications, and advancements in the mechanical performance of bioactive materials are likely to shape the trajectory of future research.Impact StatementThis bibliometric analysis highlights the growing significance of bioactive glass in dentistry, particularly in the context of remineralization, tissue regeneration, and antimicrobial protection. The increasing volume of research, highlighted by a surge in publications and international collaborations, reflects the expanding interest in bioactive glass. Prominent research areas include remineralization, hydroxyapatite applications, and mechanical properties of bioactive materials, with implications for bone regeneration and innovative dental treatments. By identifying trends and leading contributors, this study provides a foundation for future research aimed at enhancing the clinical applications and material science of bioactive glass in dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"tenteb20250016"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144183035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}