首页 > 最新文献

Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review. 骨髓干细胞与组织工程支架治疗大骨节段缺损:系统综述。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213
Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi

Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on in vivo large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) in vivo large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.

临界大小骨缺损(CSBD)是一项重大的临床挑战,刺激研究人员寻求成功的骨重建新方法。本系统综述的目的是评估骨髓干细胞(BMSC)与组织工程支架相结合是否在大型临床前动物模型中改善了CSBD的骨再生。根据以下纳入标准,对电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)进行了集中于体内大型动物研究的搜索,确定了10篇文章:(1)具有节段性骨缺损的体内大型动物模型;(2) 组织工程支架与骨髓基质干细胞联合治疗;(3) 对照组的存在;以及(4)组织学分析结果的最小值。动物研究:使用体内实验指南的报告进行质量评估,并使用实验室动物实验系统审查中心的偏倚风险工具来定义内部有效性。结果表明,组织工程支架,无论是来自自体移植物还是同种异体移植物,当与骨髓基质干细胞结合时,都能改善骨矿化和骨形成,包括在骨愈合的重塑阶段发挥关键作用。与未处理组和单独支架组相比,接种BMSC的支架显示出再生骨的生物力学特性和微结构特性有所改善。这篇综述强调了组织工程策略在临床前大型动物模型中修复广泛骨缺损的疗效。特别是,与无细胞支架相比,使用间充质干细胞与生物支架相结合似乎是一种成功的方法。
{"title":"Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nicolò Rossi,&nbsp;Henrique Hadad,&nbsp;Maria Bejar-Chapa,&nbsp;Giuseppe M Peretti,&nbsp;Mark A Randolph,&nbsp;Robert W Redmond,&nbsp;Fernando P S Guastaldi","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on <i>in vivo</i> large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) <i>in vivo</i> large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"457-472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9335503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Current Status of Tissue Regenerative Engineering for the Treatment of Uterine Infertility. 组织再生工程治疗子宫不孕的现状。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226
Di Huang, Junhui Liang, Jie Yang, Chunrun Yang, Xin Wang, Tianyu Dai, Thorsten Steinberg, Changzhong Li, Fei Wang

With the recent developments in tissue engineering, scientists have attempted to establish seed cells from different sources, create cell sheets through various technologies, implant them on scaffolds with various spatial structures, or load scaffolds with cytokines. These research results are very optimistic, bringing hope to the treatment of patients with uterine infertility. In this article, we reviewed articles related to the treatment of uterine infertility from the aspects of experimental treatment strategy, seed cells, scaffold application, and repair criteria so as to provide a basis for future research.

随着组织工程的最新发展,科学家们试图从不同来源建立种子细胞,通过各种技术制造细胞片,将其植入具有各种空间结构的支架上,或在支架上装载细胞因子。这些研究结果非常乐观,为子宫不孕患者的治疗带来了希望。本文从实验治疗策略、种子细胞、支架应用和修复标准等方面综述了与子宫不孕治疗相关的文献,为今后的研究提供依据。
{"title":"Current Status of Tissue Regenerative Engineering for the Treatment of Uterine Infertility.","authors":"Di Huang,&nbsp;Junhui Liang,&nbsp;Jie Yang,&nbsp;Chunrun Yang,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Tianyu Dai,&nbsp;Thorsten Steinberg,&nbsp;Changzhong Li,&nbsp;Fei Wang","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the recent developments in tissue engineering, scientists have attempted to establish seed cells from different sources, create cell sheets through various technologies, implant them on scaffolds with various spatial structures, or load scaffolds with cytokines. These research results are very optimistic, bringing hope to the treatment of patients with uterine infertility. In this article, we reviewed articles related to the treatment of uterine infertility from the aspects of experimental treatment strategy, seed cells, scaffold application, and repair criteria so as to provide a basis for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"558-573"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9661547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Periodontal Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes: Limitations and Possible Solutions for the Bottleneck Analysis. 牙周引导组织再生膜:瓶颈分析的局限性和可能的解决方案。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040
YiFei Ma, Xiangzhen Yan

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is an important surgical method for periodontal regeneration. By placing barrier membrane on the root surface of the tooth to guide the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells, periodontal tissue regeneration can be achieved. This review intends to analyze the current limitations of GTR membranes and to propose possible solutions for developing new ones. Limitations of current GTR membranes include nonabsorbable membranes and absorbable synthetic polymer membranes exhibit weak biocompatibility; when applying to a large defect wound, the natural collagen membrane with fast degradation rate have limited mechanical strength, and the barrier function may not be maintained well. Although the degradation time can be prolonged after cross-linking, it may cause foreign body reaction and affect tissue integration; The clinical operation of current barrier membranes is inconvenient. In addition, most of the barrier membranes lack bioactivity and will not actively promote periodontal tissue regeneration. Possible solutions include using electrospinning (ELS) techniques, nanofiber scaffolds, or developing functional gradient membranes to improve their biocompatibility; adding Mg, Zn, and/or other metal alloys, or using 3D printing technology to improve their mechanical strength; increasing the concentration of nanoparticles or using directional arrangement of membrane fibers to control the fiber diameter and porosity of the membrane, which can improve their barrier function; mixing natural and synthetic polymers as well as other biomaterials with different degradation rates in proportion to change the degradation rate and maintain barrier function; to improve the convenience of clinical operation, barrier membranes that meets personalized adhesion to the wound defect can be manufactured; developing local controlled release drug delivery systems to improve their bioactivity. Impact statement This review provides an up-to-date summary of commonly commercial periodontal guided tissue regeneration membranes, and analyze their limitations in clinical use. Using studies published recently to explore possible solutions from several perspectives and to raise possible strategies in the future. Several strategies have tested in vivo/in vitro, which will guide the way to propel clinical translation, meeting clinical needs.

引导组织再生(GTR)是一种重要的牙周再生手术方法。通过在牙齿的根表面放置屏障膜来引导牙周膜细胞的粘附和增殖,可以实现牙周组织的再生。这篇综述旨在分析GTR膜目前的局限性,并提出开发新膜的可能解决方案。目前GTR膜的局限性包括不可吸收膜和可吸收合成聚合物膜表现出弱的生物相容性;当应用于大面积缺损伤口时,降解速度快的天然胶原膜的机械强度有限,屏障功能可能无法很好地保持。虽然交联后降解时间可以延长,但可能会引起异物反应,影响组织整合;电流屏障膜的临床操作不便。此外,大多数屏障膜缺乏生物活性,不会积极促进牙周组织再生。可能的解决方案包括使用静电纺丝(ELS)技术、纳米纤维支架或开发功能梯度膜来提高其生物相容性;添加Mg、Zn和/或其他金属合金,或使用3D打印技术来提高其机械强度;提高纳米颗粒的浓度或利用膜纤维的定向排列来控制膜的纤维直径和孔隙率,可以提高其屏障功能;将天然和合成聚合物以及具有不同降解速率的其他生物材料按比例混合,以改变降解速率并保持屏障功能;为了提高临床操作的便利性,可以制造满足伤口缺损个性化粘附的屏障膜;开发局部控制释放药物递送系统以提高其生物活性。影响声明本综述提供了常见商业牙周引导组织再生膜的最新总结,并分析了其在临床应用中的局限性。利用最近发表的研究,从多个角度探讨可能的解决方案,并提出未来可能的策略。几种策略已经在体内/体外进行了测试,这些策略将指导推进临床翻译,满足临床需求。
{"title":"Periodontal Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes: Limitations and Possible Solutions for the Bottleneck Analysis.","authors":"YiFei Ma,&nbsp;Xiangzhen Yan","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is an important surgical method for periodontal regeneration. By placing barrier membrane on the root surface of the tooth to guide the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells, periodontal tissue regeneration can be achieved. This review intends to analyze the current limitations of GTR membranes and to propose possible solutions for developing new ones. Limitations of current GTR membranes include nonabsorbable membranes and absorbable synthetic polymer membranes exhibit weak biocompatibility; when applying to a large defect wound, the natural collagen membrane with fast degradation rate have limited mechanical strength, and the barrier function may not be maintained well. Although the degradation time can be prolonged after cross-linking, it may cause foreign body reaction and affect tissue integration; The clinical operation of current barrier membranes is inconvenient. In addition, most of the barrier membranes lack bioactivity and will not actively promote periodontal tissue regeneration. Possible solutions include using electrospinning (ELS) techniques, nanofiber scaffolds, or developing functional gradient membranes to improve their biocompatibility; adding Mg, Zn, and/or other metal alloys, or using 3D printing technology to improve their mechanical strength; increasing the concentration of nanoparticles or using directional arrangement of membrane fibers to control the fiber diameter and porosity of the membrane, which can improve their barrier function; mixing natural and synthetic polymers as well as other biomaterials with different degradation rates in proportion to change the degradation rate and maintain barrier function; to improve the convenience of clinical operation, barrier membranes that meets personalized adhesion to the wound defect can be manufactured; developing local controlled release drug delivery systems to improve their bioactivity. Impact statement This review provides an up-to-date summary of commonly commercial periodontal guided tissue regeneration membranes, and analyze their limitations in clinical use. Using studies published recently to explore possible solutions from several perspectives and to raise possible strategies in the future. Several strategies have tested <i>in vivo</i>/<i>in vitro</i>, which will guide the way to propel clinical translation, meeting clinical needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"532-544"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9831852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Organoid Culture Development for Skeletal Systems. 骨骼系统的类器官培养发展。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-23 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0022
Jia Qing, Qian Guo, Longwei Lv, Xiao Zhang, Yunsong Liu, Boon Chin Heng, Zheng Li, Ping Zhang, Yongsheng Zhou

Organoids are widely considered to be ideal in vitro models that have been widely applied in many fields, including regenerative medicine, disease research and drug screening. It is distinguished from other three-dimensional in vitro culture model systems by self-organization and sustainability in long-term culture. The three core components of organoid culture are cells, exogenous factors, and culture matrix. Due to the complexity of bone tissue, and heterogeneity of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells, it is challenging to construct organoids for modeling skeletal systems. In this study, we examine current progress in the development of skeletal system organoid culture systems and analyze the current research status of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and various potential organoid culture matrix candidates to provide cues for future research trajectory in this field. Impact Statement The emergence of organoids has brought new opportunities for the development of many biomedical fields. The bone organoid field still has much room for exploration. This review discusses the characteristics distinguishing organoids from other three-dimensional model systems and examines current progress in the organoid production of skeletal systems. In addition, based on core elements of organoid cultures, three main problems that need to be solved in bone organoid generation are further analyzed. These include the heterogeneity of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and potential organoid culture matrix candidates. This information provides direction for the future research of bone organoids.

类器官被广泛认为是理想的体外模型,在许多领域得到了广泛应用,包括再生医学、疾病研究和药物筛选。它与其他三维体外培养模型系统的区别在于长期培养中的自组织性和可持续性。类器官培养的三个核心组成部分是细胞、外源因子和培养基质。由于骨组织的复杂性和成骨干/祖细胞的异质性,构建用于骨骼系统建模的类器官是一项挑战。在本研究中,我们考察了骨骼系统类器官培养系统的发展现状,并分析了骨骼干细胞、其微环境因素和各种潜在的类器官培养基质候选者的研究现状,为该领域未来的研究轨迹提供线索。影响声明类器官的出现为许多生物医学领域的发展带来了新的机遇。骨类器官领域仍有很大的探索空间。这篇综述讨论了类器官与其他三维模型系统的区别特征,并考察了骨骼系统类器官生产的最新进展。此外,基于类器官培养的核心元素,进一步分析了骨类器官生成中需要解决的三个主要问题。其中包括骨骼干细胞的异质性、其微环境因素和潜在的类器官培养基质候选者。这些信息为骨类器官的未来研究提供了方向。
{"title":"Organoid Culture Development for Skeletal Systems.","authors":"Jia Qing,&nbsp;Qian Guo,&nbsp;Longwei Lv,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Yunsong Liu,&nbsp;Boon Chin Heng,&nbsp;Zheng Li,&nbsp;Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Yongsheng Zhou","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0022","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organoids are widely considered to be ideal <i>in vitro</i> models that have been widely applied in many fields, including regenerative medicine, disease research and drug screening. It is distinguished from other three-dimensional <i>in vitro</i> culture model systems by self-organization and sustainability in long-term culture. The three core components of organoid culture are cells, exogenous factors, and culture matrix. Due to the complexity of bone tissue, and heterogeneity of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells, it is challenging to construct organoids for modeling skeletal systems. In this study, we examine current progress in the development of skeletal system organoid culture systems and analyze the current research status of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and various potential organoid culture matrix candidates to provide cues for future research trajectory in this field. Impact Statement The emergence of organoids has brought new opportunities for the development of many biomedical fields. The bone organoid field still has much room for exploration. This review discusses the characteristics distinguishing organoids from other three-dimensional model systems and examines current progress in the organoid production of skeletal systems. In addition, based on core elements of organoid cultures, three main problems that need to be solved in bone organoid generation are further analyzed. These include the heterogeneity of skeletal stem cells, their microenvironmental factors, and potential organoid culture matrix candidates. This information provides direction for the future research of bone organoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"545-557"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10052426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Practice: Preclinical Trials, Clinical Applications, and Prospects. 软骨组织工程实践:临床前试验、临床应用和前景。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190
Zhen Zhang, Yulei Mu, Huiqun Zhou, Hang Yao, Dong-An Wang

Articular cartilage defects significantly compromise the quality of life in the global population. Although many strategies are needed to repair articular cartilage, including microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, and osteochondral allograft, the therapeutic effects remain suboptimal. In recent years, with the development of cartilage tissue engineering, scientists have continuously improved the formulations of therapeutic cells, biomaterial-based scaffolds, and biological factors, which have opened new avenues for better therapeutics of cartilage lesions. This review focuses on advances in cartilage tissue engineering, particularly in preclinical trials and clinical applications, prospects, and challenges.

关节软骨缺陷严重影响全球人群的生活质量。尽管需要许多策略来修复关节软骨,包括微骨折、自体骨软骨移植和骨软骨同种异体移植物,但治疗效果仍然不理想。近年来,随着软骨组织工程的发展,科学家们不断改进治疗细胞的配方、基于生物材料的支架和生物因子,为更好地治疗软骨损伤开辟了新的途径。本文综述了软骨组织工程的进展,特别是临床前试验和临床应用、前景和挑战。
{"title":"Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Practice: Preclinical Trials, Clinical Applications, and Prospects.","authors":"Zhen Zhang,&nbsp;Yulei Mu,&nbsp;Huiqun Zhou,&nbsp;Hang Yao,&nbsp;Dong-An Wang","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Articular cartilage defects significantly compromise the quality of life in the global population. Although many strategies are needed to repair articular cartilage, including microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, and osteochondral allograft, the therapeutic effects remain suboptimal. In recent years, with the development of cartilage tissue engineering, scientists have continuously improved the formulations of therapeutic cells, biomaterial-based scaffolds, and biological factors, which have opened new avenues for better therapeutics of cartilage lesions. This review focuses on advances in cartilage tissue engineering, particularly in preclinical trials and clinical applications, prospects, and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"473-490"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9367155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Pilot Study on Result Reporting Rates from Clinical Trials of Regenerative Medicine. 再生医学临床试验结果报告率的初步研究。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0126
Takaharu Negoro, Hanayuki Okura, Shigekazu Hayashi, Tsutomu Arai, Akifumi Matsuyama

Sharing the methods and results of clinical trials with full transparency is an ethical obligation for those involved in clinical research. In this regard, ClinicalTrials.gov requires reporting of results to the registry within 1 year of completion of the trial. However, a poor result reporting rate has been pointed out, with approximately half the trial results not been reported. It has been suggested that one of the reasons behind this could be the influence of sponsors who conduct the clinical trials. In the course of our previous trend analysis on regenerative medicine for stroke (STR) using ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal site as data sources, we suspected whether the results of gene and/or cell therapy trials are poorly reported. For this reason, a multivariate analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify the factors suppressing the result reporting rate, expanding our study to four different kinds of neurological diseases and regenerative medicine as a treatment modality when small-molecule compounds and biologics were set up as controls, in addition to the sponsor type factor. As a result, we found gene and/or cell therapy (therapeutic modality) in addition to STR (disease area), trials completed in 2005-2007, and clinical phases II and IV as independent factors that suppressed the rate of reporting results to ClinicalTrials.gov. On the other hand, big pharmaceutical companies were identified as a factor that increased the reporting result rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. When we applied result reporting publications through PubMed as an index, our study data revealed that the following factors were not identified as the cause for a decrease in the reporting result rate: STR (as disease area), trials completed between 2005 and 2007, and gene/cell therapy (as treatment modality). In this context, our findings indicate that gene/cell therapy has led to the suppression of the result reporting rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. This confirmed our initial suspicion of the low result reporting rate of gene/cell therapy trials. We believe that further studies are required to elucidate the factors affecting the result reporting rate from the perspective of disease area and treatment modality. Impact Statement Several studies have addressed the poor result reporting rate of clinical trials, which still remains an issue. Regenerative medicine holds great promise for the future and the process of its practical application is expected to be challenging. Although having a limited disease area and small sample size, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to point out insufficient result reporting of clinical trials of regenerative medicine from the perspective of treatment modality. This report highlights an issue for discussing the path toward its translation through an overview of various factors in comparison with conventional treatment modalities.

完全透明地分享临床试验的方法和结果是参与临床研究的人员的道德义务。在这方面,ClinicalTrials.gov要求在试验完成后1年内向注册中心报告结果。然而,结果报告率较低,约有一半的试验结果未被报告。有人认为,这背后的原因之一可能是进行临床试验的赞助者的影响。在我们之前使用ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)门户网站作为数据来源的卒中再生医学(STR)趋势分析过程中,我们怀疑基因和/或细胞治疗试验的结果是否报告不足。因此,我们使用ClinicalTrials.gov的数据进行了多变量分析,以确定抑制结果报告率的因素,将我们的研究扩展到四种不同类型的神经疾病和再生医学作为治疗方式,当小分子化合物和生物制剂作为对照时,除了申办者类型因素。因此,我们发现除了STR(疾病领域)之外,基因和/或细胞疗法(治疗方式)、2005-2007年完成的试验以及临床II期和IV期是抑制向ClinicalTrials.gov报告结果率的独立因素。另一方面,大型制药公司被认为是提高ClinicalTrials.gov报告结果率的一个因素。当我们通过PubMed应用结果报告出版物作为索引时,我们的研究数据显示以下因素未被确定为报告结果率下降的原因:STR(作为疾病区域),2005年至2007年之间完成的试验,以及基因/细胞治疗(作为治疗方式)。在这种情况下,我们的研究结果表明,基因/细胞治疗导致ClinicalTrials.gov上的结果报告率受到抑制。这证实了我们最初对基因/细胞治疗试验结果报告率低的怀疑。我们认为,从疾病领域和治疗方式的角度来阐明影响结果报告率的因素,还需要进一步的研究。一些研究已经解决了临床试验结果报告率低的问题,这仍然是一个问题。再生医学具有广阔的发展前景,但其实际应用过程将充满挑战。虽然该研究的疾病区域有限,样本量也较小,但据我们所知,这是第一个从治疗方式的角度指出再生医学临床试验结果报告不足的研究。本报告强调了通过与传统治疗方式进行比较的各种因素的概述来讨论其翻译路径的问题。
{"title":"A Pilot Study on Result Reporting Rates from Clinical Trials of Regenerative Medicine.","authors":"Takaharu Negoro,&nbsp;Hanayuki Okura,&nbsp;Shigekazu Hayashi,&nbsp;Tsutomu Arai,&nbsp;Akifumi Matsuyama","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sharing the methods and results of clinical trials with full transparency is an ethical obligation for those involved in clinical research. In this regard, ClinicalTrials.gov requires reporting of results to the registry within 1 year of completion of the trial. However, a poor result reporting rate has been pointed out, with approximately half the trial results not been reported. It has been suggested that one of the reasons behind this could be the influence of sponsors who conduct the clinical trials. In the course of our previous trend analysis on regenerative medicine for stroke (STR) using ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal site as data sources, we suspected whether the results of gene and/or cell therapy trials are poorly reported. For this reason, a multivariate analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify the factors suppressing the result reporting rate, expanding our study to four different kinds of neurological diseases and regenerative medicine as a treatment modality when small-molecule compounds and biologics were set up as controls, in addition to the sponsor type factor. As a result, we found gene and/or cell therapy (therapeutic modality) in addition to STR (disease area), trials completed in 2005-2007, and clinical phases II and IV as independent factors that suppressed the rate of reporting results to ClinicalTrials.gov. On the other hand, big pharmaceutical companies were identified as a factor that increased the reporting result rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. When we applied result reporting publications through PubMed as an index, our study data revealed that the following factors were not identified as the cause for a decrease in the reporting result rate: STR (as disease area), trials completed between 2005 and 2007, and gene/cell therapy (as treatment modality). In this context, our findings indicate that gene/cell therapy has led to the suppression of the result reporting rate to ClinicalTrials.gov. This confirmed our initial suspicion of the low result reporting rate of gene/cell therapy trials. We believe that further studies are required to elucidate the factors affecting the result reporting rate from the perspective of disease area and treatment modality. Impact Statement Several studies have addressed the poor result reporting rate of clinical trials, which still remains an issue. Regenerative medicine holds great promise for the future and the process of its practical application is expected to be challenging. Although having a limited disease area and small sample size, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to point out insufficient result reporting of clinical trials of regenerative medicine from the perspective of treatment modality. This report highlights an issue for discussing the path toward its translation through an overview of various factors in comparison with conventional treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"358-368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10322412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Progress of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injury. 低强度脉冲超声在周围神经损伤修复中的研究进展。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194
Xuling Liu, Derong Zou, Yinghan Hu, Yushi He, Jiayu Lu

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common disease that has profound impact on the health of patients, but has poor prognosis. The gold standard for the treatment of peripheral nerve defects is autologous nerve grafting; notwithstanding, due to the extremely high requirement for surgeons and medical facilities, there is great interest in developing better treatment strategies for PNI. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a noninterventional stimulation method characterized by low-intensity pulsed waves. It has good therapeutic effect on fractures, inflammation, soft tissue regeneration, and nerve regulation, and can participate in PNI repair from multiple perspectives. This review concentrates on the effects and mechanisms of LIPUS in the repair of PNI from the perspective of LIPUS stimulation of neural cells and stem cells, modulation of neurotrophic factors, signaling pathways, proinflammatory cytokines, and nerve-related molecules. In addition, the effects of LIPUS on nerve conduits are reviewed, as nerve conduits are expected to be a successful alternative treatment for PNI with the development of tissue engineering. Overall, the application advantages and prospects of LIPUS in the repair of PNI are highlighted by summarizing the effects of LIPUS on seed cells, neurotrophic factors, and nerve conduits for neural tissue engineering.

周围神经损伤(PNI)是一种严重影响患者健康的常见病,但预后较差。自体神经移植是治疗周围神经缺损的金标准;尽管如此,由于对外科医生和医疗设施的要求极高,人们对制定更好的PNI治疗战略非常感兴趣。低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)是一种以低强度脉冲波为特征的非介入性刺激方法。对骨折、炎症、软组织再生、神经调节均有良好的治疗效果,可多角度参与PNI修复。本文主要从LIPUS刺激神经细胞和干细胞、调节神经营养因子、信号通路、促炎细胞因子和神经相关分子等方面综述LIPUS在PNI修复中的作用和机制。此外,本文还综述了LIPUS对神经导管的影响,随着组织工程的发展,神经导管有望成为PNI的成功替代治疗方法。总之,通过综述LIPUS在神经组织工程中对种子细胞、神经营养因子、神经导管的作用,强调了LIPUS在PNI修复中的应用优势和前景。
{"title":"Research Progress of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injury.","authors":"Xuling Liu,&nbsp;Derong Zou,&nbsp;Yinghan Hu,&nbsp;Yushi He,&nbsp;Jiayu Lu","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common disease that has profound impact on the health of patients, but has poor prognosis. The gold standard for the treatment of peripheral nerve defects is autologous nerve grafting; notwithstanding, due to the extremely high requirement for surgeons and medical facilities, there is great interest in developing better treatment strategies for PNI. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a noninterventional stimulation method characterized by low-intensity pulsed waves. It has good therapeutic effect on fractures, inflammation, soft tissue regeneration, and nerve regulation, and can participate in PNI repair from multiple perspectives. This review concentrates on the effects and mechanisms of LIPUS in the repair of PNI from the perspective of LIPUS stimulation of neural cells and stem cells, modulation of neurotrophic factors, signaling pathways, proinflammatory cytokines, and nerve-related molecules. In addition, the effects of LIPUS on nerve conduits are reviewed, as nerve conduits are expected to be a successful alternative treatment for PNI with the development of tissue engineering. Overall, the application advantages and prospects of LIPUS in the repair of PNI are highlighted by summarizing the effects of LIPUS on seed cells, neurotrophic factors, and nerve conduits for neural tissue engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"414-428"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9959935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Call for Special Issue Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Tissue Engineering and Biology. 征稿:组织工程和生物学中的人工智能。
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp
Jason L Guo, Michael Januszyk, Michael T Longaker
{"title":"<i>Call for Special Issue Papers:</i> Artificial Intelligence in Tissue Engineering and Biology.","authors":"Jason L Guo,&nbsp;Michael Januszyk,&nbsp;Michael T Longaker","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2023.29019.cfp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"332-333"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9971473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Case for Material Stiffness as a Design Parameter in Encapsulated Islet Transplantation. 将材料刚度作为包裹式胰岛移植设计参数的案例
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157
Courtney D Johnson, Helim Aranda-Espinoza, John P Fisher

Diabetes is a disease that plagues over 463 million people globally. Approximately 40 million of these patients have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and the global incidence is increasing by up to 5% per year. T1DM is where the body's immune system attacks the pancreas, specifically the pancreatic beta cells, with antibodies to prevent insulin production. Although current treatments such as exogenous insulin injections have been successful, exorbitant insulin costs and meticulous administration present the need for alternative long-term solutions to glucose dysregulation caused by diabetes. Encapsulated islet transplantation (EIT) is a tissue-engineered solution to diabetes. Donor islets are encapsulated in a semipermeable hydrogel, allowing the diffusion of oxygen, glucose, and insulin but preventing leukocyte infiltration and antibody access to the transplanted cells. Although successful in small animal models, EIT is still far from commercial use owing to necessary long-term systemic immunosuppressants and consistent immune rejection. Most published research has focused on tailoring the characteristics of the capsule material to promote clinical viability. However, most studies have been limited in scope to biochemical changes. Current mechanobiology studies on the effect of substrate stiffness on the function of leukocytes, especially macrophages-primary foreign body response (FBR) orchestrators, show promise in tailoring a favorable response to tissue-engineered therapies such as EIT. In this review, we explore strategies to improve the clinical viability of EIT. A brief overview of the immune system, the FBR, and current biochemical approaches will be elucidated throughout this exploration. Furthermore, an argument for using substrate stiffness as a capsule design parameter to increase EIT efficacy and clinical viability will be posed.

糖尿病是一种困扰全球超过 4.63 亿人的疾病。其中约有 4000 万患者患有 1 型糖尿病(T1DM),全球发病率正以每年高达 5%的速度递增。T1DM 是指人体免疫系统用抗体攻击胰腺,特别是胰腺 beta 细胞,阻止胰岛素分泌。尽管外源性胰岛素注射等现有治疗方法取得了成功,但高昂的胰岛素费用和精细的用药使人们需要寻找其他长期解决方案来解决糖尿病引起的血糖失调问题。包裹胰岛移植(EIT)是一种组织工程糖尿病解决方案。捐献的胰岛被包裹在半透性水凝胶中,允许氧气、葡萄糖和胰岛素扩散,但阻止白细胞浸润和抗体进入移植细胞。虽然 EIT 在小型动物模型中取得了成功,但由于需要长期使用全身性免疫抑制剂和持续的免疫排斥反应,因此距离商业化应用还很遥远。大多数已发表的研究都集中于调整胶囊材料的特性,以提高临床可行性。然而,大多数研究的范围仅限于生化变化。目前关于基质硬度对白细胞功能影响的机械生物学研究,尤其是巨噬细胞--异物反应(FBR)的主要协调者--显示了对组织工程疗法(如 EIT)定制有利反应的前景。在这篇综述中,我们将探讨提高 EIT 临床可行性的策略。在整个探讨过程中将简要概述免疫系统、FBR 和当前的生化方法。此外,我们还将提出将基质硬度作为胶囊设计参数以提高 EIT 疗效和临床可行性的论点。
{"title":"A Case for Material Stiffness as a Design Parameter in Encapsulated Islet Transplantation.","authors":"Courtney D Johnson, Helim Aranda-Espinoza, John P Fisher","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes is a disease that plagues over 463 million people globally. Approximately 40 million of these patients have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and the global incidence is increasing by up to 5% per year. T1DM is where the body's immune system attacks the pancreas, specifically the pancreatic beta cells, with antibodies to prevent insulin production. Although current treatments such as exogenous insulin injections have been successful, exorbitant insulin costs and meticulous administration present the need for alternative long-term solutions to glucose dysregulation caused by diabetes. Encapsulated islet transplantation (EIT) is a tissue-engineered solution to diabetes. Donor islets are encapsulated in a semipermeable hydrogel, allowing the diffusion of oxygen, glucose, and insulin but preventing leukocyte infiltration and antibody access to the transplanted cells. Although successful in small animal models, EIT is still far from commercial use owing to necessary long-term systemic immunosuppressants and consistent immune rejection. Most published research has focused on tailoring the characteristics of the capsule material to promote clinical viability. However, most studies have been limited in scope to biochemical changes. Current mechanobiology studies on the effect of substrate stiffness on the function of leukocytes, especially macrophages-primary foreign body response (FBR) orchestrators, show promise in tailoring a favorable response to tissue-engineered therapies such as EIT. In this review, we explore strategies to improve the clinical viability of EIT. A brief overview of the immune system, the FBR, and current biochemical approaches will be elucidated throughout this exploration. Furthermore, an argument for using substrate stiffness as a capsule design parameter to increase EIT efficacy and clinical viability will be posed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"334-346"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10056947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug Delivery Approaches to Improve Tendon Healing. 改善肌腱愈合的给药方法
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-08 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188
Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, Danielle S W Benoit, Alayna E Loiselle

Tendon injuries disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to chronic pain, disability, and a large socioeconomic burden. Tendon injuries are prevalent; there are over 300,000 tendon repair procedures a year in the United States to address acute trauma or chronic tendinopathy. Successful restoration of function after tendon injury remains challenging clinically. Despite improvements in surgical and physical therapy techniques, the high complication rate of tendon repair procedures motivates the use of therapeutic interventions to augment healing. While many biological and tissue engineering approaches have attempted to promote scarless tendon healing, there is currently no standard clinical treatment to improve tendon healing. Moreover, the limited efficacy of systemic delivery of several promising therapeutic candidates highlights the need for tendon-specific drug delivery approaches to facilitate translation. This review article will synthesize the current state-of-the-art methods that have been used for tendon-targeted delivery through both systemic and local treatments, highlight emerging technologies used for tissue-specific drug delivery in other tissue systems, and outline future challenges and opportunities to enhance tendon healing through targeted drug delivery.

肌腱损伤破坏了从肌肉到骨骼的力量传递,导致慢性疼痛、残疾和巨大的社会经济负担。肌腱损伤非常普遍,美国每年有 30 多万例肌腱修复手术,用于治疗急性创伤或慢性肌腱病。肌腱损伤后成功恢复功能在临床上仍具有挑战性。尽管手术和理疗技术有所改进,但肌腱修复术的高并发症率促使人们使用治疗干预措施来促进愈合。虽然许多生物和组织工程方法都试图促进无疤痕肌腱愈合,但目前还没有一种标准的临床疗法能改善肌腱愈合。此外,几种有前景的候选疗法的全身给药疗效有限,这凸显了对肌腱特异性给药方法的需求,以促进转化。这篇综述文章将综述目前通过全身和局部治疗进行肌腱靶向给药的最先进方法,重点介绍在其他组织系统中用于组织特异性给药的新兴技术,并概述通过靶向给药促进肌腱愈合的未来挑战和机遇。
{"title":"Drug Delivery Approaches to Improve Tendon Healing.","authors":"Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, Danielle S W Benoit, Alayna E Loiselle","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188","DOIUrl":"10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tendon injuries disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to chronic pain, disability, and a large socioeconomic burden. Tendon injuries are prevalent; there are over 300,000 tendon repair procedures a year in the United States to address acute trauma or chronic tendinopathy. Successful restoration of function after tendon injury remains challenging clinically. Despite improvements in surgical and physical therapy techniques, the high complication rate of tendon repair procedures motivates the use of therapeutic interventions to augment healing. While many biological and tissue engineering approaches have attempted to promote scarless tendon healing, there is currently no standard clinical treatment to improve tendon healing. Moreover, the limited efficacy of systemic delivery of several promising therapeutic candidates highlights the need for tendon-specific drug delivery approaches to facilitate translation. This review article will synthesize the current state-of-the-art methods that have been used for tendon-targeted delivery through both systemic and local treatments, highlight emerging technologies used for tissue-specific drug delivery in other tissue systems, and outline future challenges and opportunities to enhance tendon healing through targeted drug delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":"29 4","pages":"369-386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442691/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10410960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1