首页 > 最新文献

Transplantation proceedings最新文献

英文 中文
Factors Associated With Intraoperative Blood Loss in Living Donor Liver Transplantation 活体肝移植术中出血量的相关因素。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.007
Kaoru Umehara , Kazuhiro Shirozu , Ken Yamaura

Background

Although several studies have assessed factors associated with intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during liver transplantation, most have been conducted on brain-dead donors, with few studies on living donors that have reported inconsistent findings. This study retrospectively investigated factors associated with IBL in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

This study included 250 patients aged ≥20 years who underwent LDLT at our institution between January 2013 and September 2018. IBL, obtained from anesthetic records, was subjected to log-transformation and analyzed using a general linear regression model. The backward method was used for variable selection and the values were exponentially transformed to describe the results.

Results

Multivariable analysis revealed that male sex (vs female, 1.37-fold, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.66), body mass index (BMI) (1.05-fold for every 1 kg/m2 increase, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08), platelet count (0.98-fold for every 10,000/µL increase, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99), white blood cell (WBC) count (1.04-fold for every 1000/µL increase, 95% CI: 1.002-1.08), serum sodium ion (Na+) levels (0.96-fold for every 1 mEq/L increase, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), serum total protein (TP) (0.88-fold for every 1 g/dL increase, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98), and use of a venous bypass (vs nonuse, 1.96-fold, 95% CI: 1.01-3.73) were significantly associated with IBL.

Conclusions

Male sex, high BMI, low platelet count, high WBC count, low Na+ levels, low TP levels, and the use of venous bypass can lead to excessive IBL during LDLT. Preoperative assessment of these factors is crucial for perioperative management.
背景:虽然有几项研究评估了肝移植术中出血量(IBL)的相关因素,但大多数研究都是针对脑死亡供体进行的,很少有针对活体供体的研究报告了不一致的结果。本研究回顾性调查了活体供肝移植(LDLT)中IBL的相关因素。方法:本研究纳入了2013年1月至2018年9月在我院接受LDLT治疗的250例年龄≥20岁的患者。从麻醉记录中获得的IBL进行对数变换,并使用一般线性回归模型进行分析。采用逆向方法进行变量选择,并将数值进行指数变换来描述结果。结果:多变量分析显示,男性(相对于女性,1.37倍,95%可信区间(CI): 1.14-1.66)、体重指数(BMI)(1.05倍,每增加1 kg/m2, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08)、血小板计数(0.98倍,每增加10,000/µL, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99)、白细胞计数(1.04倍,每增加1000/µL, 95% CI: 1.002-1.08)、血清钠离子(Na+)水平(0.96倍,每增加1 mEq/L, 95% CI: 1.96 -1.08):0.94-0.98)、血清总蛋白(TP)(每增加1 g/dL增加0.88倍,95% CI: 0.79-0.98)和静脉旁路的使用(与未使用相比,1.96倍,95% CI: 1.01-3.73)与IBL显著相关。结论:男性、高BMI、低血小板计数、高WBC计数、低Na+水平、低TP水平以及静脉旁路的使用可导致LDLT期间IBL过度。术前评估这些因素对围手术期管理至关重要。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Intraoperative Blood Loss in Living Donor Liver Transplantation","authors":"Kaoru Umehara ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Shirozu ,&nbsp;Ken Yamaura","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although several studies have assessed factors associated with intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during liver transplantation, most have been conducted on brain-dead donors, with few studies on living donors that have reported inconsistent findings. This study retrospectively investigated factors associated with IBL in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 250 patients aged ≥20 years who underwent LDLT at our institution between January 2013 and September 2018. IBL, obtained from anesthetic records, was subjected to log-transformation and analyzed using a general linear regression model. The backward method was used for variable selection and the values were exponentially transformed to describe the results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Multivariable analysis revealed that male sex (vs female, 1.37-fold, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.66), body mass index (BMI) (1.05-fold for every 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increase, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08), platelet count (0.98-fold for every 10,000/µL increase, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99), white blood cell (WBC) count (1.04-fold for every 1000/µL increase, 95% CI: 1.002-1.08), serum sodium ion (Na<sup>+</sup>) levels (0.96-fold for every 1 mEq/L increase, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), serum total protein (TP) (0.88-fold for every 1 g/dL increase, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98), and use of a venous bypass (vs nonuse, 1.96-fold, 95% CI: 1.01-3.73) were significantly associated with IBL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Male sex, high BMI, low platelet count, high WBC count, low Na<sup>+</sup> levels, low TP levels, and the use of venous bypass can lead to excessive IBL during LDLT. Preoperative assessment of these factors is crucial for perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Biliary Complications in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Is There a Role of Anastomosis Type and Epstein–Barr Virus Viremia? 小儿肝移植胆道并发症的结局:吻合类型和eb病毒血症是否有影响?
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.004
Cansu Altuntaş , Alaaddin Aydın , Ali Koçyiğit , Eryiğit Eren , Fatih Ensaroğlu , Mehmet Tokaç , Gülden Özek , Taylan Şahin , Ayhan Dinçkan

Background

Biliary complications remain a common adverse event after pediatric liver transplantation, with distinct etiologies and management approaches based on timing. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of early and late biliary complications in a high-volume living donor pediatric liver transplant center.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 98 pediatric liver transplantations performed between January 2018 and February 2024. Biliary complications were categorized as early (≤90 days) or late (>90 days) post-transplant. Risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. The impact of biliary complications on overall survival was also evaluated.

Results

Biliary complications occurred in 34.6% (n = 34) of cases. Early complications (19.4%, n = 19) were predominantly bile leaks, with duct-to-duct anastomosis identified as an independent risk factor (OR: 5.179, 95% CI: 1.511-17.756). Late complications (15.3%, n = 15) were primarily biliary strictures. Older recipient age and EBV viremia emerged as significant independent risk factors for late biliary complications (OR: 1.140 and OR: 60.793, respectively). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between patients with and without biliary complications (P = .158).

Conclusion

Duct-to-duct anastomosis remains a safe and reliable option in anatomically suitable pediatric cases when performed by experienced teams, despite a higher risk of early complications. EBV viremia and increased recipient age are significant predictors of late biliary strictures. These findings emphasize the need for vigilant surveillance, individualized transplant timing, and standardized EBV management strategies to reduce long-term biliary morbidity.
背景:胆道并发症仍然是儿童肝移植后常见的不良事件,具有不同的病因和基于时间的管理方法。本研究旨在评估大容量儿童活体肝移植中心早期和晚期胆道并发症的发生率、危险因素和结局。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2024年2月间进行的98例小儿肝移植手术。胆道并发症分为移植后早期(≤90天)和晚期(≤90天)。使用单变量和多变量logistic回归模型评估危险因素。还评估了胆道并发症对总生存的影响。结果:34例胆道并发症发生率为34.6%。早期并发症以胆漏为主(19.4%,n = 19),导管与导管吻合为独立危险因素(OR: 5.179, 95% CI: 1.511-17.756)。晚期并发症(15.3%,n = 15)主要为胆道狭窄。老年受体年龄和EBV病毒血症是晚期胆道并发症的重要独立危险因素(OR: 1.140和OR: 60.793)。有无胆道并发症患者的总生存率无显著差异(P = 0.158)。结论:尽管早期并发症的风险较高,但当由经验丰富的团队进行吻合时,导管对导管吻合仍然是一种安全可靠的选择。EBV病毒血症和受体年龄增加是晚期胆道狭窄的重要预测因素。这些发现强调了警惕监测、个体化移植时机和标准化EBV管理策略的必要性,以减少长期胆道发病率。
{"title":"Outcomes of Biliary Complications in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Is There a Role of Anastomosis Type and Epstein–Barr Virus Viremia?","authors":"Cansu Altuntaş ,&nbsp;Alaaddin Aydın ,&nbsp;Ali Koçyiğit ,&nbsp;Eryiğit Eren ,&nbsp;Fatih Ensaroğlu ,&nbsp;Mehmet Tokaç ,&nbsp;Gülden Özek ,&nbsp;Taylan Şahin ,&nbsp;Ayhan Dinçkan","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biliary complications remain a common adverse event after pediatric liver transplantation, with distinct etiologies and management approaches based on timing. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of early and late biliary complications in a high-volume living donor pediatric liver transplant center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 98 pediatric liver transplantations performed between January 2018 and February 2024. Biliary complications were categorized as early (≤90 days) or late (&gt;90 days) post-transplant. Risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. The impact of biliary complications on overall survival was also evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Biliary complications occurred in 34.6% (n = 34) of cases. Early complications (19.4%, n = 19) were predominantly bile leaks, with duct-to-duct anastomosis identified as an independent risk factor (OR: 5.179, 95% CI: 1.511-17.756). Late complications (15.3%, n = 15) were primarily biliary strictures. Older recipient age and EBV viremia emerged as significant independent risk factors for late biliary complications (OR: 1.140 and OR: 60.793, respectively). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between patients with and without biliary complications (<em>P</em> = .158).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Duct-to-duct anastomosis remains a safe and reliable option in anatomically suitable pediatric cases when performed by experienced teams, despite a higher risk of early complications. EBV viremia and increased recipient age are significant predictors of late biliary strictures. These findings emphasize the need for vigilant surveillance, individualized transplant timing, and standardized EBV management strategies to reduce long-term biliary morbidity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single Center Retrospective Comparison of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Standard Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Donor Allogeneic Transplantation 移植后环磷酰胺和标准移植抗宿主病预防在匹配供体异体移植中的单中心回顾性比较。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.008
Haein Kim , Akil Merchant , Justin Darrah , Joshua Sasine , Hannah Lee , Robert Vescio , David Oveisi , Brittany McGalliard , Yuliya Linhares , Ali Rejali , Patricia Van Strein , Ellen Klapper , Behrooz Hekimian , John Chute , Ron Paquette , Noah Merin

Background

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was developed to allow the use of haploidentical donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), then tested with matched donors. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Blood and Marrow Transplant was an early adopter of PTCy for matched alloHSCT in 2016.

Purpose of the Research

We retrospectively analyzed 15-year outcomes of patients who underwent alloHSCT with matched donor stem cells prior to 2016 (n = 252), with the outcomes of patients who were transplanted in the PTCy era, post-2016 (n = 99), to assess the impact of the switch to PTCy, while controlling for other differences between the cohorts.

Principle Results

Overall Survival (OS) was better in the PTCy group (at 1 year, 90% vs 62%, P < .0001), and the difference persisted in OS at 2 years and 3 years. There was no difference in relapse (26% non-PTCy vs 19% PTCy; P = .3560). Non-relapse mortality was lower with PTCy, 7% vs 22% without, P = .0002. Acute GVHD was lower in the PTCy group (16% PTCy vs 33% non-PTCy, P = .0013). Chronic GVHD was similar between the two groups, 35% in the PTCy group and 42% in the non-PTCy group (P = .1235), but the rate of extensive cGVHD was lower, 15% with PTCy vs 29% without; P = .0078. Post-transplant hospital stay was shorter, 23 ± 13.1 days in the non-PTCy group and 18 ± 7.0 days with PTCy, P < .0001.

Conclusions

Long-term follow up of patients transplanted using PTCy with matched donors has demonstrated superiority of PTCy compared to tacrolimus methotrexate.
背景:移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)的开发是为了允许使用单倍体相同的供体进行同种异体干细胞移植(alloHSCT),然后与匹配的供体进行测试。雪松-西奈医学中心血液和骨髓移植是2016年早期采用PTCy进行匹配同种异体造血干细胞移植的机构。研究目的:我们回顾性分析了2016年之前(n = 252)接受匹配供体干细胞移植的同种异体造血干细胞移植患者的15年预后,以及2016年之后(n = 99)在PTCy时代移植的患者的预后,以评估转向PTCy的影响,同时控制队列之间的其他差异。主要结果:PTCy组的总生存期(OS)更好(1年,90% vs 62%, P < 0.0001), 2年和3年的OS差异持续存在。复发率无差异(26%非PTCy vs 19% PTCy; P = 0.3560)。PTCy组的非复发死亡率较低,为7%,而未PTCy组为22%,P = 0.0002。PTCy组急性GVHD发生率较低(PTCy组为16%,非PTCy组为33%,P = 0.0013)。两组间慢性GVHD相似,PTCy组为35%,非PTCy组为42% (P = 0.1235),但广泛性cGVHD的发生率较低,PTCy组为15%,未PTCy组为29%;P = 0.0078。移植后住院时间较短,非PTCy组为23±13.1 d, PTCy组为18±7.0 d, P < 0.0001。结论:长期随访使用PTCy与匹配供体移植的患者显示了PTCy与他克莫司甲氨蝶呤相比的优势。
{"title":"Single Center Retrospective Comparison of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Standard Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Donor Allogeneic Transplantation","authors":"Haein Kim ,&nbsp;Akil Merchant ,&nbsp;Justin Darrah ,&nbsp;Joshua Sasine ,&nbsp;Hannah Lee ,&nbsp;Robert Vescio ,&nbsp;David Oveisi ,&nbsp;Brittany McGalliard ,&nbsp;Yuliya Linhares ,&nbsp;Ali Rejali ,&nbsp;Patricia Van Strein ,&nbsp;Ellen Klapper ,&nbsp;Behrooz Hekimian ,&nbsp;John Chute ,&nbsp;Ron Paquette ,&nbsp;Noah Merin","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was developed to allow the use of haploidentical donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), then tested with matched donors. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Blood and Marrow Transplant was an early adopter of PTCy for matched alloHSCT in 2016.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose of the Research</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 15-year outcomes of patients who underwent alloHSCT with matched donor stem cells prior to 2016 (n = 252), with the outcomes of patients who were transplanted in the PTCy era, post-2016 (n = 99), to assess the impact of the switch to PTCy, while controlling for other differences between the cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Principle Results</h3><div>Overall Survival (OS) was better in the PTCy group (at 1 year, 90% vs 62%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and the difference persisted in OS at 2 years and 3 years. There was no difference in relapse (26% non-PTCy vs 19% PTCy; <em>P</em> = .3560). Non-relapse mortality was lower with PTCy, 7% vs 22% without, <em>P</em> = .0002. Acute GVHD was lower in the PTCy group (16% PTCy vs 33% non-PTCy, <em>P</em> = .0013). Chronic GVHD was similar between the two groups, 35% in the PTCy group and 42% in the non-PTCy group (<em>P</em> = .1235), but the rate of extensive cGVHD was lower, 15% with PTCy vs 29% without; <em>P</em> = .0078. Post-transplant hospital stay was shorter, 23 ± 13.1 days in the non-PTCy group and 18 ± 7.0 days with PTCy, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Long-term follow up of patients transplanted using PTCy with matched donors has demonstrated superiority of PTCy compared to tacrolimus methotrexate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 207-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145947017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Organs Donated after Cardiac Death in China: A Real-World Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the T-DCD and Start-DCD Studies 中国心脏死亡后接受器官捐献的肾移植患者的胸腺球蛋白诱导治疗:T-DCD和Start-DCD研究的真实患者水平汇总分析
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.002
Yang Li, Wujun Xue

Background

Thymoglobulin is used in kidney transplantation as an induction therapy to prevent acute rejections; however, studies and data to support thymoglobulin induction therapy in Chinese patients undergoing kidney transplant with donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of thymoglobulin induction therapy in recipients of DCD kidney transplant in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

This pooled analysis from the T-DCD and START-DCD studies was conducted to investigate acute rejection (AR), biopsy-proven AR (BPAR), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft and patient survival at 6 months in patients undergoing DCD kidney transplantation in the pooled population, in subgroups receiving thymoglobulin doses of <4 mg/kg and ≥4 mg/kg, and in subgroups receiving thymoglobulin doses of <1.5 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg, and ≥4 mg/kg. Possible risk factors for AR, BPAR, DGF, graft survival, and patient survival were investigated as well.

Results

A total of 458 patients were included in this study. The incidence of AR within 6 months was 8% (n = 10) in patients receiving <4 mg/kg of thymoglobulin and 10.5% (n = 35) in those receiving ≥4 mg/kg. The dose-dependent incidence of BPAR was 3.1% in patients receiving a thymoglobulin dose <1.5 mg/kg, 2.3% in those receiving 1.5 to 4 mg/kg, and 1.6% in those receiving ≥4 mg/kg. In these 3 subgroups, a statistically significant reduction in DGF incidence (P = .023) was observed in 21.9%, 15.9%, and 7.2% of patients, respectively. The overall graft survival and patient survival rates at 6 months were 98% and 99.56%, respectively. The possible risk factors for AR were donor or recipient age, those for DGF were baseline creatinine and dosage, and those for graft survival were donor body mass index, warm ischemia time, thymoglobulin dosage, and donor history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Conclusion

Based on a pooled analysis of the T-DCD and START-DCD data in Chinese patients, treatment with thymoglobulin as an induction therapy has shown greater dose-dependent protection against DGF within 6 months after kidney transplantation. The higher thymoglobulin dose did not prolong the duration or reduce the incidence of AR and BPAR and showed no significant effect on graft survival or patient survival within 6 months of transplantation.
背景:胸腺球蛋白在肾移植中作为一种诱导疗法用于预防急性排斥反应;然而,支持胸腺球蛋白诱导治疗在中国心脏死亡(DCD)肾移植(肾捐赠)患者中的应用的研究和数据仍不清楚。因此,我们在现实世界的临床实践中研究了胸腺球蛋白诱导治疗在DCD肾移植受者中的临床效果。方法:从T-DCD和START-DCD研究中进行汇总分析,研究在接受胸腺球蛋白剂量的亚组中,接受DCD肾移植患者的急性排斥反应(AR)、活检证实的AR (BPAR)、移植延迟功能(DGF)以及移植和患者6个月生存率。结论:基于对中国患者T-DCD和START-DCD数据的汇总分析,胸腺球蛋白作为诱导治疗在肾移植后6个月内显示出更大的剂量依赖性DGF保护作用。较高的胸腺球蛋白剂量并未延长AR和BPAR的持续时间或降低其发生率,对移植物存活或移植后6个月内患者存活无显著影响。
{"title":"Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Organs Donated after Cardiac Death in China: A Real-World Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the T-DCD and Start-DCD Studies","authors":"Yang Li,&nbsp;Wujun Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thymoglobulin is used in kidney transplantation as an induction therapy to prevent acute rejections; however, studies and data to support thymoglobulin induction therapy in Chinese patients undergoing kidney transplant with donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of thymoglobulin induction therapy in recipients of DCD kidney transplant in real-world clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This pooled analysis from the T-DCD and START-DCD studies was conducted to investigate acute rejection (AR), biopsy-proven AR (BPAR), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft and patient survival at 6 months in patients undergoing DCD kidney transplantation in the pooled population, in subgroups receiving thymoglobulin doses of &lt;4 mg/kg and ≥4 mg/kg, and in subgroups receiving thymoglobulin doses of &lt;1.5 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg, and ≥4 mg/kg. Possible risk factors for AR, BPAR, DGF, graft survival, and patient survival were investigated as well.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 458 patients were included in this study. The incidence of AR within 6 months was 8% (n = 10) in patients receiving &lt;4 mg/kg of thymoglobulin and 10.5% (n = 35) in those receiving ≥4 mg/kg. The dose-dependent incidence of BPAR was 3.1% in patients receiving a thymoglobulin dose &lt;1.5 mg/kg, 2.3% in those receiving 1.5 to 4 mg/kg, and 1.6% in those receiving ≥4 mg/kg. In these 3 subgroups, a statistically significant reduction in DGF incidence (<em>P</em> = .023) was observed in 21.9%, 15.9%, and 7.2% of patients, respectively. The overall graft survival and patient survival rates at 6 months were 98% and 99.56%, respectively. The possible risk factors for AR were donor or recipient age, those for DGF were baseline creatinine and dosage, and those for graft survival were donor body mass index, warm ischemia time, thymoglobulin dosage, and donor history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on a pooled analysis of the T-DCD and START-DCD data in Chinese patients, treatment with thymoglobulin as an induction therapy has shown greater dose-dependent protection against DGF within 6 months after kidney transplantation. The higher thymoglobulin dose did not prolong the duration or reduce the incidence of AR and BPAR and showed no significant effect on graft survival or patient survival within 6 months of transplantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145968174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality Estimation in Renal Disease (MERD Score): A Model Predicting Waitlist Mortality in Kidney Transplant Candidates 肾脏疾病死亡率估计(MERD评分):预测肾移植候选者候补名单死亡率的模型。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.010
Aisha Albu Mustaf , Jose Ramirez , Ashley Montgomery , Gwendolyn Henry , Abbas Rana

Background

Predicting waitlist mortality is important for prioritizing organ allocation and selecting candidates for extended criteria donors. Currently, there is no widely adopted and reliable index for predicting early mortality among kidney transplant candidates. In this study, we aim to develop an index score utilizing variables from the OPTN database to predict mortality among adult kidney transplant candidates within 3 years of being on the waitlist.

Methods

This study utilized data from 147,307 adult kidney transplant candidates listed in the OPTN database from 2018 to 2023. The cohort was randomly divided into training and validation groups. Sixteen variables were analyzed using univariate logistic regression, with significant factors incorporated into a multivariable analysis to develop the MERD (Mortality Estimation in Renal Disease) score. Predictive performance was assessed through ROC analysis in both cohorts.

Results

Ten variables, age, ABO blood type, ethnicity, dialysis duration, presence of peripheral vascular disease, albumin level, functional status, Previous kidney malignancy, primary etiologies of kidney disease, and insurance type were identified as significant predictors and used to formulate the MERD score. The AUC was 0.6657 in the training cohort and 0.6580 in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The MERD score provides proof of concept for short-term mortality prediction for kidney transplant waitlist candidates. Further prospective validation and model refinement are warranted.
背景:预测等候名单死亡率对于优先分配器官和选择扩展标准供体的候选人是重要的。目前,还没有广泛采用的可靠的指标来预测肾移植候选人的早期死亡率。在这项研究中,我们的目标是利用OPTN数据库中的变量开发一个指数评分,以预测在等待名单上的3年内成人肾移植候选人的死亡率。方法:本研究使用了2018年至2023年OPTN数据库中列出的147,307名成人肾移植候选人的数据。该队列随机分为训练组和验证组。使用单变量逻辑回归分析16个变量,并将重要因素纳入多变量分析以建立MERD(肾脏疾病死亡率估计)评分。通过ROC分析评估两个队列的预测性能。结果:年龄、ABO血型、种族、透析持续时间、周围血管疾病的存在、白蛋白水平、功能状态、既往肾恶性肿瘤、肾脏疾病的原发性病因和保险类型等10个变量被确定为显著预测因素,并用于制定MERD评分。训练组的AUC为0.6657,验证组的AUC为0.6580。结论:MERD评分为肾移植候选者的短期死亡率预测提供了概念证明。进一步的前瞻性验证和模型改进是必要的。
{"title":"Mortality Estimation in Renal Disease (MERD Score): A Model Predicting Waitlist Mortality in Kidney Transplant Candidates","authors":"Aisha Albu Mustaf ,&nbsp;Jose Ramirez ,&nbsp;Ashley Montgomery ,&nbsp;Gwendolyn Henry ,&nbsp;Abbas Rana","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Predicting waitlist mortality is important for prioritizing organ allocation and selecting candidates for extended criteria donors. Currently, there is no widely adopted and reliable index for predicting early mortality among kidney transplant candidates. In this study, we aim to develop an index score utilizing variables from the OPTN database to predict mortality among adult kidney transplant candidates within 3 years of being on the waitlist.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study utilized data from 147,307 adult kidney transplant candidates listed in the OPTN database from 2018 to 2023. The cohort was randomly divided into training and validation groups. Sixteen variables were analyzed using univariate logistic regression, with significant factors incorporated into a multivariable analysis to develop the MERD (Mortality Estimation in Renal Disease) score. Predictive performance was assessed through ROC analysis in both cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><u>T</u>en variables, age, ABO blood type, ethnicity, dialysis duration, presence of peripheral vascular disease, albumin level, functional status, Previous kidney malignancy, primary etiologies of kidney disease, and insurance type were identified as significant predictors and used to formulate the MERD score. The AUC was 0.6657 in the training cohort and 0.6580 in the validation cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MERD score provides proof of concept for short-term mortality prediction for kidney transplant waitlist candidates. Further prospective validation and model refinement are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 83-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145947043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in Patient Symptoms After Kidney Transplantation 肾移植后患者症状的变化
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.005
Catherine P. King , Amelia R. Cossart , Nicole M. Isbel , Scott B. Campbell , Meng-Wong Taing , Diana Leary , Vincent Houlihan , Christine E. Staatz

Background

Immunosuppressant usage in kidney transplant recipients is commonly associated with toxicity which can manifest in a variety of adverse effects. This study aimed to compare the nature and frequency of patient-reported symptoms before and after kidney transplantation.

Methods

A single-center study was conducted involving adult kidney transplant recipients at 3 to 11 weeks post-transplantation. Patients completed a questionnaire pertaining to the prevalence of symptoms experienced a few months before and since transplantation. A paired Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to identify changes in the number and frequency of symptoms, respectively, with a p-value <.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Eighty patients completed this non-interventional study. While a similar number of symptoms (mean ± standard deviation) were experienced before and after transplantation (9.9 ± 4.8 and 9.0 ± 4.7, respectively; p = .098) there was a shift in the frequency of symptoms. Since transplantation, there was an improvement (reduced frequency) in itch (p ≤ .001), tiredness/fatigue (p = .045), nausea (p ≤ .001), headache/migraine (p ≤ .001), fidgetiness/restlessness (p = .018) and mind going blank (p = .022). However, hand tremor (p ≤.001), tremor elsewhere (p ≤.001), waking at night (p ≤.001), and dysesthesia (thermodysregulation and paresthesia) (p = .008) worsened (increased frequency), as reported by 75%, 26%, 45%, and 38% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Many patients experience tremor and dysesthesia as new symptoms or report them more frequently early after transplantation. Further research into understanding and managing these toxicities over this period is warranted.
背景:在肾移植受者中使用免疫抑制剂通常与毒性相关,可表现为各种不良反应。本研究旨在比较肾移植前后患者报告的症状的性质和频率。方法:对移植后3 - 11周的成人肾移植受者进行单中心研究。患者完成了一份关于移植前和移植后几个月症状发生率的调查问卷。配对的学生t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验分别用于确定症状数量和频率的变化,并具有p值。结果:80名患者完成了这项非介入性研究。虽然移植前后出现的症状数量(平均±标准差)相似(分别为9.9±4.8和9.0±4.7,p = 0.098),但出现症状的频率发生了变化。自移植以来,瘙痒(p≤0.001)、疲倦/疲劳(p = 0.045)、恶心(p≤0.001)、头痛/偏头痛(p≤0.001)、烦躁/不安(p = 0.018)和大脑空白(p = 0.022)的改善(频率降低)。然而,手部震颤(p≤0.001)、其他部位震颤(p≤0.001)、夜间醒来(p≤0.001)和感觉不良(体温失调和感觉异常)(p = 0.008)加重(频率增加),分别有75%、26%、45%和38%的患者报告。结论:许多患者在移植后早期出现震颤和感觉不良的新症状或更频繁地报告这些症状。有必要在这一时期进一步研究了解和管理这些毒性。
{"title":"Changes in Patient Symptoms After Kidney Transplantation","authors":"Catherine P. King ,&nbsp;Amelia R. Cossart ,&nbsp;Nicole M. Isbel ,&nbsp;Scott B. Campbell ,&nbsp;Meng-Wong Taing ,&nbsp;Diana Leary ,&nbsp;Vincent Houlihan ,&nbsp;Christine E. Staatz","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Immunosuppressant usage in kidney transplant recipients is commonly associated with toxicity which can manifest in a variety of adverse effects. This study aimed to compare the nature and frequency of patient-reported symptoms before and after kidney transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center study was conducted involving adult kidney transplant recipients at 3 to 11 weeks post-transplantation. Patients completed a questionnaire pertaining to the prevalence of symptoms experienced a few months before and since transplantation. A paired Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to identify changes in the number and frequency of symptoms, respectively, with a <em>p</em>-value &lt;.05 considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty patients completed this non-interventional study. While a similar number of symptoms (mean ± standard deviation) were experienced before and after transplantation (9.9 ± 4.8 and 9.0 ± 4.7, respectively; <em>p</em> = .098) there was a shift in the frequency of symptoms. Since transplantation, there was an improvement (reduced frequency) in itch (<em>p</em> ≤ .001), tiredness/fatigue (<em>p</em> = .045), nausea (<em>p</em> ≤ .001), headache/migraine (<em>p</em> ≤ .001), fidgetiness/restlessness (<em>p</em> = .018) and mind going blank (<em>p</em> = .022). However, hand tremor (<em>p</em> ≤.001), tremor elsewhere (<em>p</em> ≤.001), waking at night (<em>p</em> ≤.001), and dysesthesia (thermodysregulation and paresthesia) (<em>p</em> = .008) worsened (increased frequency), as reported by 75%, 26%, 45%, and 38% of patients, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Many patients experience tremor and dysesthesia as new symptoms or report them more frequently early after transplantation. Further research into understanding and managing these toxicities over this period is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145947052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fospropofol Disodium for Anesthesia Induction in Liver Transplant Recipients - A Case Series 病例报告:氟丙酚二钠用于肝移植受者麻醉诱导-一个病例系列。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.011
Rong Wang , Xiaojuan Jiang , Weiyi Zhang

Background

Fospropofol disodium for injection (FospropofolFD) is a novel water-soluble propofol prodrug metabolized by alkaline phosphatase (ALP). In contrast to propofol, it demonstrates superior hemodynamic stability and reduced lipid metabolism-related adverse effects in patients with normal hepatic function. These characteristics hold particular significance for liver transplant recipients with decompensated cirrhosis, who frequently exhibit hemodynamic instability and impaired lipid homeostasis. However, clinical evidence supporting the use of FospropofolFD in this high-risk population remains lacking. This case series aims to evaluate the potential advantages of FospropofolFD for anesthesia induction in liver transplant recipients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, three cirrhotic patients (Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores: 22-38) were administered FospropofolFD-based induction (10 mg/kg) during liver transplantation. Hemodynamics, bispectral index (BIS), and perioperative organ function were monitored.

Results

All patients achieved rapid induction (≤1 minute) with stable hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg) and BIS <60. No intraoperative hypoxemia or delayed awakening occurred. Postoperative hepatic/renal function remained stable, with extubation completed ≤10 minutes. Diverging from reports in non-cirrhotic cohorts, we found that ALP levels did not correlate with BIS trends, suggesting multifactorial influences on pharmacokinetics in end-stage liver disease.

Conclusion

Although these findings highlight FospropofolFD’s potential as a lipid-free alternative to propofol in high-risk liver transplant settings, the observational design and small sample size (n = 3) warrant further validation through randomized controlled trials to establish dosing protocols and confirm safety and efficacy.
背景:注射用磷丙酚二钠(FospropofolFD)是一种由碱性磷酸酶(ALP)代谢的新型水溶性丙泊酚前药。与异丙酚相比,它在肝功能正常的患者中表现出优越的血流动力学稳定性和减少脂质代谢相关的不良反应。这些特征对失代偿性肝硬化肝移植受者尤其重要,他们经常表现出血流动力学不稳定和脂质稳态受损。然而,支持在这一高危人群中使用fo丙泊叶酸的临床证据仍然缺乏。本病例系列旨在评估氟丙酚fd用于Child-Pugh B/C肝硬化肝移植受者麻醉诱导的潜在优势。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,3名肝硬化患者(终末期肝病模型评分:22-38)在肝移植期间给予基于磷丙叶酸的诱导(10 mg/kg)。监测血流动力学、双谱指数(BIS)及围手术期脏器功能。结果:所有患者均实现了快速诱导(≤1分钟),血流动力学稳定(平均动脉压≥60 mm Hg), BIS稳定。结论:尽管这些发现突出了fopropofolfd作为高风险肝移植环境中丙泊酚的无脂替代品的潜力,但观察性设计和小样本量(n = 3)需要通过随机对照试验进一步验证,以建立给药方案并确认安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Fospropofol Disodium for Anesthesia Induction in Liver Transplant Recipients - A Case Series","authors":"Rong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Jiang ,&nbsp;Weiyi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fospropofol disodium for injection (Fospropofol<sub>FD</sub>) is a novel water-soluble propofol prodrug metabolized by alkaline phosphatase (ALP). In contrast to propofol, it demonstrates superior hemodynamic stability and reduced lipid metabolism-related adverse effects in patients with normal hepatic function. These characteristics hold particular significance for liver transplant recipients with decompensated cirrhosis, who frequently exhibit hemodynamic instability and impaired lipid homeostasis. However, clinical evidence supporting the use of Fospropofol<sub>FD</sub> in this high-risk population remains lacking. This case series aims to evaluate the potential advantages of Fospropofol<sub>FD</sub> for anesthesia induction in liver transplant recipients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective observational study, three cirrhotic patients (Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores: 22-38) were administered Fospropofol<sub>FD</sub>-based induction (10 mg/kg) during liver transplantation. Hemodynamics, bispectral index (BIS), and perioperative organ function were monitored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients achieved rapid induction (≤1 minute) with stable hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg) and BIS &lt;60. No intraoperative hypoxemia or delayed awakening occurred. Postoperative hepatic/renal function remained stable, with extubation completed ≤10 minutes. Diverging from reports in non-cirrhotic cohorts, we found that ALP levels did not correlate with BIS trends, suggesting multifactorial influences on pharmacokinetics in end-stage liver disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although these findings highlight Fospropofol<sub>FD</sub>’s potential as a lipid-free alternative to propofol in high-risk liver transplant settings, the observational design and small sample size (n = 3) warrant further validation through randomized controlled trials to establish dosing protocols and confirm safety and efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145947058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Use of Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin After Liver Transplant 乙肝免疫球蛋白在肝移植术后应用的评价。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.001
Ella Shanahan, Trana Hussaini, Eric M. Yoshida
Current guidelines differ on the duration that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy should be offered after liver transplant for hepatitis B. Most guidelines state that selected patients who are considered at low risk of recurrence could discontinue HBIG therapy 6 to 12 months posttransplant. At Vancouver General Hospital, a cohort of patients remains on HBIG therapy long term. The aim of this audit was to evaluate whether we are following the proposed guidelines established by several organizations (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver). Our unit maintains a database of all patients currently on HBIG therapy since the inception of the program. This database was accessed, and all patients currently receiving HBIG therapy were included in the audit. The cases were manually reviewed, and data were collected for date of transplant, indication for transplant, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma in explant, hepatitis B virus DNA level at the time of transplant, presence of HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, hepatitis B serology, any episodes of relapse, and which antiviral the patient was taking. Twenty-two patients were included in the audit. Eight patients (36%) have been identified who are currently receiving HBIG therapy that could be ceased. Three patients developed a recurrence of hepatitis B surface antigen on lamivudine. These patients could be changed to tenofovir and have their HBIG ceased with monitoring as per protocol. This project demonstrates that patients receiving HBIG therapy should be more regularly reviewed for consideration of cessation, in line with the guidelines.
目前的指南对乙肝肝移植后乙肝免疫球蛋白(HBIG)治疗的持续时间存在分歧,大多数指南指出,被认为复发风险较低的患者可以在移植后6至12个月停止HBIG治疗。在温哥华总医院,一组患者长期接受HBIG治疗。这次审计的目的是评估我们是否遵循了几个组织(美国肝病研究协会、欧洲肝脏研究协会、加拿大肝脏研究协会)制定的拟议准则。我们的单位维护着一个数据库,其中包含了自项目开始以来所有正在接受HBIG治疗的患者。该数据库被访问,所有目前接受HBIG治疗的患者被纳入审计。人工审查病例,收集移植日期、移植指征、外植体中是否存在肝细胞癌、移植时乙型肝炎病毒DNA水平、是否存在HIV或D型肝炎病毒合并感染、乙型肝炎血清学、是否复发以及患者正在服用何种抗病毒药物等数据。22例患者被纳入审计。8名患者(36%)目前正在接受可停止的HBIG治疗。3例患者使用拉米夫定后乙型肝炎表面抗原复发。这些患者可以改为替诺福韦,并根据方案停止HBIG的监测。该项目表明,接受HBIG治疗的患者应根据指南更定期地进行复查,以考虑停止治疗。
{"title":"Evaluating the Use of Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin After Liver Transplant","authors":"Ella Shanahan,&nbsp;Trana Hussaini,&nbsp;Eric M. Yoshida","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current guidelines differ on the duration that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy should be offered after liver transplant for hepatitis B. Most guidelines state that selected patients who are considered at low risk of recurrence could discontinue HBIG therapy 6 to 12 months posttransplant. At Vancouver General Hospital, a cohort of patients remains on HBIG therapy long term. The aim of this audit was to evaluate whether we are following the proposed guidelines established by several organizations (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver). Our unit maintains a database of all patients currently on HBIG therapy since the inception of the program. This database was accessed, and all patients currently receiving HBIG therapy were included in the audit. The cases were manually reviewed, and data were collected for date of transplant, indication for transplant, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma in explant, hepatitis B virus DNA level at the time of transplant, presence of HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, hepatitis B serology, any episodes of relapse, and which antiviral the patient was taking. Twenty-two patients were included in the audit. Eight patients (36%) have been identified who are currently receiving HBIG therapy that could be ceased. Three patients developed a recurrence of hepatitis B surface antigen on lamivudine. These patients could be changed to tenofovir and have their HBIG ceased with monitoring as per protocol. This project demonstrates that patients receiving HBIG therapy should be more regularly reviewed for consideration of cessation, in line with the guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 126-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145902063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping the Geographic Distribution of Lung Transplant Centers and Smoking-Associated Diseases Across the United States 绘制美国肺移植中心和吸烟相关疾病的地理分布图。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.009
Luke M. Tomasovic , Jeremy R. Ellis , Jessica M. Ruck , Anmol Warman , Alexandra A. Rizaldi , Errol L. Bush

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are progressive lung diseases strongly associated with cigarette smoking, together accounting for nearly 50% of lung transplants annually. Given this widespread disease burden, we aimed to assess whether the uneven distribution of transplant centers contributes to regional disparities in lung transplant access for patients with COPD and IPF.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from multiple, publicly available databases. We analyzed state-level data on cigarette users, COPD or IPF deaths, lung transplant centers, and recipients of lung transplants for COPD or IPF. To identify regions where transplant services may be inadequate relative to the burden of smoking-associated diseases, we also created 2 novel metrics: the cigarette users-to-transplant recipients (CUT) ratio and the smoking-associated disease deaths-to-transplant recipients (SADT) ratio.

Results

Across states, there were significant negative correlations between transplant center density and both the CUT and SADT ratios. Moreover, states without a transplant center had significantly higher CUT and SADT ratios and fewer lung transplant recipients per capita than states with more than 3 centers per 100,000 square miles. Choropleth maps further illustrated that CUT and SADT ratios are higher in regions with a lower density of transplant centers.

Conclusions

These findings reveal geographic disparities in access to lung transplants for COPD or IPF, highlighting the need to provide additional support to candidates in states without lung transplant centers. Future studies should focus on identifying specific patient populations who encounter social or geographic barriers to transplant care.
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是与吸烟密切相关的进行性肺部疾病,每年共占肺移植的近50%。鉴于这种广泛的疾病负担,我们旨在评估移植中心分布不均是否导致COPD和IPF患者肺移植可及性的地区差异。方法:我们使用来自多个公开数据库的数据进行了横断面分析。我们分析了州一级的烟草使用者、COPD或IPF死亡人数、肺移植中心和COPD或IPF肺移植受者的数据。为了确定移植服务相对于吸烟相关疾病负担可能不足的地区,我们还创建了两个新的指标:吸烟者与移植受者(CUT)之比和吸烟相关疾病死亡与移植受者(SADT)之比。结果:在各州,移植中心密度与CUT和SADT比率之间存在显著的负相关。此外,与每10万平方英里有3个以上移植中心的州相比,没有移植中心的州的CUT和SADT比例明显更高,人均肺移植受者也更少。Choropleth图进一步表明,在移植中心密度较低的地区,CUT和SADT比率较高。结论:这些发现揭示了COPD或IPF患者获得肺移植的地理差异,强调了在没有肺移植中心的州为候选人提供额外支持的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于确定在移植护理中遇到社会或地理障碍的特定患者群体。
{"title":"Mapping the Geographic Distribution of Lung Transplant Centers and Smoking-Associated Diseases Across the United States","authors":"Luke M. Tomasovic ,&nbsp;Jeremy R. Ellis ,&nbsp;Jessica M. Ruck ,&nbsp;Anmol Warman ,&nbsp;Alexandra A. Rizaldi ,&nbsp;Errol L. Bush","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are progressive lung diseases strongly associated with cigarette smoking, together accounting for nearly 50% of lung transplants annually. Given this widespread disease burden, we aimed to assess whether the uneven distribution of transplant centers contributes to regional disparities in lung transplant access for patients with COPD and IPF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from multiple, publicly available databases. We analyzed state-level data on cigarette users, COPD or IPF deaths, lung transplant centers, and recipients of lung transplants for COPD or IPF. To identify regions where transplant services may be inadequate relative to the burden of smoking-associated diseases, we also created 2 novel metrics: the cigarette users-to-transplant recipients (CUT) ratio and the smoking-associated disease deaths-to-transplant recipients (SADT) ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across states, there were significant negative correlations between transplant center density and both the CUT and SADT ratios. Moreover, states without a transplant center had significantly higher CUT and SADT ratios and fewer lung transplant recipients per capita than states with more than 3 centers per 100,000 square miles. Choropleth maps further illustrated that CUT and SADT ratios are higher in regions with a lower density of transplant centers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings reveal geographic disparities in access to lung transplants for COPD or IPF, highlighting the need to provide additional support to candidates in states without lung transplant centers. Future studies should focus on identifying specific patient populations who encounter social or geographic barriers to transplant care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145949512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Donor Exclusions for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a Tertiary Center 三级中心活体肝移植供者排除评估。
IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.006
Tufan Gumus , Veysel Umman , Berk Sertoz , Ezgi Guler , Alper Uguz , Ozen Onen Sertoz , Elvan Isik , Fulya Gunsar , Murat Zeytunlu , Sukru Emre

Introduction

The success of living donor liver transplantation is closely related to donor selection. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays a crucial role in saving lives, especially where cadaveric donations are limited. Donor selection is pivotal for the success of LDLT, emphasizing donor rights, minimizing complications, and ensuring donor survival. The main purpose for donor evaluation is to provide a suitable graft for the recipient while assuring a safe operation for the donor. This study aims to identify our center's donor exclusion reasons, assess limitations in donor pool utilization, and enhance its effectiveness.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 680 healthy individuals who applied as liver donor candidates to our center between November 2016 and November 2021. Of these, 170 underwent donor hepatectomy, while 510 candidates deemed unsuitable were investigated.

Results

A total of 170 (25%) candidates became liver donors (group A), and 510 (75%) candidates were found unsuitable (group B). Recipient-related reasons (179, 35.09%) made up the leading exclusion cause. Psychiatric problems (105, 20%) ranked second among the reasons for rejection of donor candidates, and hepatosteatosis was the third most common reason.

Conclusion

The critical factor determining the success of living donor liver transplantation is the precise selection of the donor. Achieving optimal donor selection is feasible through a comprehensive multidisciplinary liver transplant team and clearly defined criteria. By employing appropriate selection standards and a skilled transplant team, it is feasible to enhance the pool of liver donors and conduct more living donor liver transplants with reduced morbidity and mortality rates.
活体肝移植的成功与否与供体的选择密切相关。活体肝移植(LDLT)在挽救生命方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在尸体捐赠有限的情况下。供体选择是LDLT成功的关键,强调供体权利,减少并发症,并确保供体生存。供体评估的主要目的是为受者提供合适的移植物,同时确保供体手术的安全。本研究旨在找出本中心供体排斥的原因,评估供体池利用的局限性,并提高其有效性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年11月至2021年11月期间680名健康个体申请肝候选供体的数据。其中,170人接受了供体肝切除术,510人被认为不适合接受调查。结果:A组有170例(25%)候选肝脏供体,B组有510例(75%)不适合肝脏供体。受赠人相关原因179个,占35.09%。精神问题排在第二位(105.20%),肝细胞附着症排在第三位。结论:准确的供体选择是决定活体肝移植成功的关键因素。通过全面的多学科肝移植团队和明确定义的标准,实现最佳供体选择是可行的。通过采用合适的选择标准和一支熟练的移植团队,可以增加肝脏供体库,进行更多的活体肝脏移植,降低发病率和死亡率。
{"title":"Evaluation of Donor Exclusions for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a Tertiary Center","authors":"Tufan Gumus ,&nbsp;Veysel Umman ,&nbsp;Berk Sertoz ,&nbsp;Ezgi Guler ,&nbsp;Alper Uguz ,&nbsp;Ozen Onen Sertoz ,&nbsp;Elvan Isik ,&nbsp;Fulya Gunsar ,&nbsp;Murat Zeytunlu ,&nbsp;Sukru Emre","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.11.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The success of living donor liver transplantation is closely related to donor selection. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays a crucial role in saving lives, especially where cadaveric donations are limited. Donor selection is pivotal for the success of LDLT, emphasizing donor rights, minimizing complications, and ensuring donor survival. The main purpose for donor evaluation is to provide a suitable graft for the recipient while assuring a safe operation for the donor. This study aims to identify our center's donor exclusion reasons, assess limitations in donor pool utilization, and enhance its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed data from 680 healthy individuals who applied as liver donor candidates to our center between November 2016 and November 2021. Of these, 170 underwent donor hepatectomy, while 510 candidates deemed unsuitable were investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 170 (25%) candidates became liver donors (group A), and 510 (75%) candidates were found unsuitable (group B). Recipient-related reasons (179, 35.09%) made up the leading exclusion cause. Psychiatric problems (105, 20%) ranked second among the reasons for rejection of donor candidates, and hepatosteatosis was the third most common reason.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The critical factor determining the success of living donor liver transplantation is the precise selection of the donor. Achieving optimal donor selection is feasible through a comprehensive multidisciplinary liver transplant team and clearly defined criteria. By employing appropriate selection standards and a skilled transplant team, it is feasible to enhance the pool of liver donors and conduct more living donor liver transplants with reduced morbidity and mortality rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 130-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Transplantation proceedings
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1