Trends in cancer最新文献

Recent advances in spatial multi-omics technologies and analytical methods are transforming our understanding of how cancer cells and their microenvironments interact to drive critical processes such as lineage plasticity, immune evasion, and therapeutic resistance. By linking cancer cell states, lineage plasticity, clonal dynamics, oncogenic pathways, and cellular interactions to their spatial context, these innovations provide deep biological insights and reveal clinically relevant molecular programs and spatial biomarkers. This review highlights key breakthroughs in spatial profiling and computational approaches, including integration with computational pathology, multimodal data, and machine learning to uncover important biological insights. We discuss challenges in spatial multimodal data integration and emerging clinical applications, and we propose a roadmap to accelerate clinical translation and advance precision oncology through spatially resolved, actionable, molecular insights.

Multi-omics integration is reshaping cancer research by combining histopathology, transcriptomics, and proteomics with spatial and temporal context. Schweizer et al. revealed compartment-specific biology, RNA-protein decoupling, and emergent molecular patterns underpinning malignant transformation in low-grade serous carcinoma, highlighting the potential of integrated multi-omics to uncover novel mechanisms and guide precision oncology.

Cancer cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to sustain their energy demands, and favor glycolysis despite the presence of functional mitochondria. This metabolic shift leads to the rapid production of lactate and protons. If not managed, this accumulation of acidic byproducts would lower the intracellular pH (pH_i). To counteract this, cancer cells employ diverse mechanisms to extrude excess protons through membrane transporters, and also sequester them within acidic organelles. Consequently, an alkaline pH_i provides cancer cells with a survival advantage by promoting their proliferation, migration, and resistance to cell death. Given the role of organellar acidification in sustaining this altered pH balance, targeting this process represents a potential therapeutic vulnerability in cancer. We explore the mechanisms by which cancer cells maintain pH homeostasis, with a particular focus on organellar pH and its impact on tumor progression. In addition, we assess inhibitors of the key transporters involved in organellar acidification and discuss their therapeutic potential in cancer.

Stem-like CD8⁺ T cells - characterized by high-level expression of the transcription factor TCF-1, and known as progenitor exhausted T (T_pex) cells - have emerged as crucial mediators of durable antitumor immunity. These cells demonstrate unique self-renewal capacity, multipotency, and enhanced responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. This review synthesizes current understanding of T_pex cell biology, including their defining characteristics, tissue distribution, and functional importance in antitumor immunity. We focus particularly on innovative approaches to preserve and enhance T cell stemness through combination therapies, cytokine signal modulation, epigenetic regulation, tumor microenvironment modification, and microbiota-based interventions. The development of these next-generation immunotherapies targeting T cell stemness represents a transformative frontier in oncology, holding significant promise for improving therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) govern RNA-based post-transcriptional processes that generate the abundance and diversity of the proteome. RBPs have recently emerged as crucial cancer regulators that can influence multiple cancer hallmarks. However, many RBPs display remarkable variations across different tumor types and can exert both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressive effects. These opposing roles are often attributed to context-dependency, but there is a distinct lack of clarity regarding what aspects of cellular context define the differences in the roles of RBPs. Given the recent development of RBP-targeted interventions, resolving this significant gap in the field could improve the selectivity and specificity of RBP biomarkers and therapies in cancer. This review analyzes recent findings and explores the mechanisms by which the functional plasticity of RBPs in tumorigenesis may arise.

Stem cell-like blasts have been associated with hierarchical tumor-initiating potential and poor outcomes in myeloid leukemias. Previous studies using primary samples of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have identified blasts that immunophenotypically and transcriptomically resemble hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), but failed to consistently demonstrate hierarchical tumor-initiating potential in xenograft models. Recent multi-omic profiling of lymphoblastic and mixed-phenotype leukemias has improved our understanding of the phenotypes of HSPC-like blasts and their association with treatment failure, relapse, and lineage switch during therapy. In this review, we highlight the opportunities and challenges of using HSPC-like blasts to risk-stratify patients with ALL and direct patients with relapsed/refractory disease toward targeted therapies.

CX3CL1 (fractalkine) is a unique chemokine with dual roles in cancer biology, capable of exerting both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressive effects. Acting through its receptor CX3CR1, CX3CL1 facilitates immune evasion, angiogenesis, metastasis, and tumor cell survival and proliferation by recruiting immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Conversely, it can enhance antitumor immunity by attracting cytotoxic T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells into the tumor microenvironment. CX3CL1 has also been implicated in promoting immunogenic cell death-induced anticancer immune responses. However, excessive expression of CX3CL1 may paradoxically suppress immune activation, highlighting the importance of dose and context in its application. CX3CL1-based gene or mRNA therapies, particularly in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, show promising potential for cancer treatment.

RAS genes encode molecular switches that control cell growth and survival, and their oncogenic mutations drive many cancers. Once deemed 'undruggable', RAS is now being challenged by innovative inhibitors. Recent advances, reported by Stanland and Huggins et al. and Feng et al., include EFTX-G12V, an EGFR-directed allele-specific RNAi therapeutic, and MCB-36, a dual-state pan-KRAS degrader, exemplifying precision RAS-targeted strategies.

It is widely recognized that cancer develops through a series of changes that modify the genomes of normal cells, enabling them to acquire new malignant properties. Epigenetic disruptions, which do not directly change the genetic sequence but rather influence how the genome is interpreted, have garnered significant attention as contributors to malignant transformation and progression. With the advent of new technologies to profile both the genome and epigenome of cancer cells simultaneously, the interplay between structural variation (SV) and epigenetic changes in malignancy is now an expanding field. In this review, we describe the key technological advances and highlight recent research exploring the relationship between SV and the epigenome in cancer.

Viral mimicry is a cellular state in which the reactivation of silenced transposable elements (TEs) leads to the accumulation of immunogenic nucleic acids, triggering innate immune pathways that resemble responses mounted against viral pathogens. Although they were first characterized in the context of epigenetic therapies, growing evidence indicates that other cancer treatment modalities - including radiotherapy, chemotherapies, and targeted therapies - can also induce TE reactivation and viral mimicry responses in cancer cells. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on treatment-induced TE-mediated immune responses in cancer, highlighting therapeutic strategies, shared and distinct molecular mechanisms, and their broader implications for tumor-immune interactions and treatment outcomes.