首页 > 最新文献

Vascular最新文献

英文 中文
Axillary artery aneurysms in pediatric patients: A narrative review. 儿科患者腋窝动脉瘤:一个叙述性的回顾。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-12 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231215595
Francesca Palma, Giuseppe Asciutto, Marco Virgilio Usai

Objectives: Axillary artery aneurysms in children are rare and multifactorial. The presenting clinical picture can range from an incidental discovery to threatening symptoms, including loss of extremity function. With the present study we aim to give a comprehensive review of the existing literature focusing on the etiology and management of this rare but threatening pathology.

Method: A comprehensive review was made in a multi-staged manner. All identified studies have been categorized based on the type of lesions (true or false aneurysm) and their etiologies.

Results: The treatments differ from the extension of the lesions and from the etiology.

Conclusions: Open surgery repair with great saphenous vein is still the best long-term approach, but even endovascular, embolization, or conservative management can be considered.

目的:儿童腋窝动脉瘤是一种罕见且多因素的疾病。目前的临床表现可以从偶然发现到威胁性症状,包括四肢功能丧失。在目前的研究中,我们的目的是对现有的文献进行全面的回顾,重点是这种罕见但具有威胁性的病理的病因和治疗。方法:分多阶段进行综合评价。所有确定的研究都是根据病变类型(真或假动脉瘤)及其病因进行分类的。结果:根据病变范围及病因不同,治疗方法不同。结论:大隐静脉开放性手术修复仍是最佳的长期治疗方法,但也可考虑血管内栓塞或保守治疗。
{"title":"Axillary artery aneurysms in pediatric patients: A narrative review.","authors":"Francesca Palma, Giuseppe Asciutto, Marco Virgilio Usai","doi":"10.1177/17085381231215595","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231215595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Axillary artery aneurysms in children are rare and multifactorial. The presenting clinical picture can range from an incidental discovery to threatening symptoms, including loss of extremity function. With the present study we aim to give a comprehensive review of the existing literature focusing on the etiology and management of this rare but threatening pathology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive review was made in a multi-staged manner. All identified studies have been categorized based on the type of lesions (true or false aneurysm) and their etiologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatments differ from the extension of the lesions and from the etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open surgery repair with great saphenous vein is still the best long-term approach, but even endovascular, embolization, or conservative management can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1285-1290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89719728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigation of the effect of visceral adiposity index on venous clinical severity score in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. 内脏脂肪指数对慢性静脉功能不全患者静脉临床严重程度评分影响的研究。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231214818
Haci Eskici, Mesut Engin, Cüneyt Eris, Ufuk Aydın, Yusuf Ata, Şenol Yavuz

Introduction: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common disease affecting millions worldwide. Age, obesity, female gender, sedentary life, and long-standing at work causing orthostasis have been identified as predisposing factors.

Objective: The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is an important indicator of abdominal obesity. Various studies in the cardiovascular field have shown that it may be more predictive than body mass index (BMI).

Methods: A total of 171 consecutive patients diagnosed with low-grade (C0-C3) superficial primary CVI in our clinic, between November 2021 and December 2022, were included in this prospective study. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) values were calculated. The patients were divided into two groups according to their VCSS values (Group 1: VCSS ≤6 and Group 2: VCSS >6).

Results: There were 110 patients in Group 1 with a median age of 42 (18-50) years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, smoking, hypertension frequency, height, weight, body mass index, hemoglobin values, lymphocyte, neutrophil, mean platelet volume, urea, creatinine, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride, and total cholesterol values (p > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to reveal the predictive factors of high VCSS values in patients. As a result of the analysis, VAI (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.775; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.389-2.269; p < .001) and CRP (OR: 2.641; 95% CI: 1.431-4.875; p = .002) values were identified as independent predictors in predicting high VCSS values.

Conclusion: This current study showed that high VAI values affect clinical complaints in patients with low-grade CVI. In line with our results, clinical recommendations can be made to reduce VAI values in low-stage CVI patients.

引言:慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)是一种常见疾病,影响着全球数百万人。年龄、肥胖、女性、久坐不动的生活和长期工作导致的直立性已被确定为易感因素。目的:内脏脂肪指数(VAI)是腹部肥胖的重要指标。心血管领域的各种研究表明,它可能比身体质量指数(BMI)更具预测性。方法:在2021年11月至2022年12月期间,我们诊所共有171名连续诊断为低级别(C0-C3)浅表原发性CVI的患者被纳入这项前瞻性研究。计算静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)值。根据VCSS值将患者分为两组(第1组:VCSS≤6,第2组:VCSS>6)。结果:第1组有110名患者,中位年龄为42(18-50)岁。两组在性别、吸烟、高血压频率、身高、体重、体重指数、血红蛋白值、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞、平均血小板体积、尿素、肌酸酐、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白和甘油三酯方面无差异,和总胆固醇值(p>0.05)。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以揭示患者高VCSS值的预测因素。作为分析的结果,VAI(比值比(OR):1.775;95%置信区间(CI):1.389-2.269;p<.001)和CRP(OR:2.641;95%CI:1.431-4.875;p=0.002)值被确定为预测高VCSS值的独立预测因子。结论:本研究表明,高VAI值会影响低级别CVI患者的临床主诉。根据我们的研究结果,可以提出临床建议来降低低阶段CVI患者的VAI值。
{"title":"Investigation of the effect of visceral adiposity index on venous clinical severity score in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.","authors":"Haci Eskici, Mesut Engin, Cüneyt Eris, Ufuk Aydın, Yusuf Ata, Şenol Yavuz","doi":"10.1177/17085381231214818","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231214818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common disease affecting millions worldwide. Age, obesity, female gender, sedentary life, and long-standing at work causing orthostasis have been identified as predisposing factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is an important indicator of abdominal obesity. Various studies in the cardiovascular field have shown that it may be more predictive than body mass index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 171 consecutive patients diagnosed with low-grade (C0-C3) superficial primary CVI in our clinic, between November 2021 and December 2022, were included in this prospective study. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) values were calculated. The patients were divided into two groups according to their VCSS values (Group 1: VCSS ≤6 and Group 2: VCSS >6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 110 patients in Group 1 with a median age of 42 (18-50) years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, smoking, hypertension frequency, height, weight, body mass index, hemoglobin values, lymphocyte, neutrophil, mean platelet volume, urea, creatinine, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride, and total cholesterol values (<i>p</i> > .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to reveal the predictive factors of high VCSS values in patients. As a result of the analysis, VAI (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.775; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.389-2.269; <i>p</i> < .001) and CRP (OR: 2.641; 95% CI: 1.431-4.875; <i>p</i> = .002) values were identified as independent predictors in predicting high VCSS values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This current study showed that high VAI values affect clinical complaints in patients with low-grade CVI. In line with our results, clinical recommendations can be made to reduce VAI values in low-stage CVI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1340-1345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71486632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous aortoiliac kissing Endovascular stenting for management of isolated monolateral common iliac artery aneurysm with no proximal landing zone. 同时进行主动脉髂吻血管内支架植入术治疗孤立的单侧髂总动脉瘤,且无近端着床区。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231193793
Roberto Gabrielli, Andrea Siani, Gianluca Smedile, Anna Rita Rizzo, Roberto Antonelli, Gennaro De Vivo, Federico Accrocca, Stefano Bartoli

Background: Isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IIAA) is an uncommon finding. It, accounts for 0.03% of all patients and 2% of all abdominal aneurysm. Endovascular approach represents the treatment of choice for most patients with IIAA. We reported our experience on iliac aneurysm with no proximal landing zone by simultaneous aortoiliac kissing endovascular (S.A.K.E.) covered stenting.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of nine consecutive patients with IIAA with no proximal landing zone, who underwent endovascular kissing covered stenting (Gore®Viabahn®VBX) The median aneurysm diameter was 4.1 cm, with a median 3-mm proximal neck length. In 3/9 aneurysms involving the internal iliac arteries the origin of the internal iliac artery was covered after its embolization and a stent graft extending to the external iliac artery (EIA) was placed. All stents were flared with semi-compliant balloon.

Results: Iliac aneurysm exclusion was obtained in all cases (100%), no graft migration or endo-leak were recorded. The median operative time was 28 min; the median fluoroscopy time was 9 min and a median 70 mL of contrast was used. At a median 24-month follow-up, all patients are alive, and no endo-leak or migration, infection, distal embolization, limb loss were observed. Moderate buttock claudication was experienced in 1/9 patients with internal iliac artery embolization. In 6/9 patients a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac was recorded after 1 year.

Discussion: Endovascular management of IIAAs cases has been reported in literature and it was confirmed to be safe and successful. The IAA usually progresses into expansion which eventually leads into rupture. Adequate long proximal and distal landing zones were the most important feature related to better outcomes. Short proximal neck (˂10 mm) represents a real challenge for iliac aneurysm treatment and, nowadays, a classical bifurcated aortoiliac endograft deployment represents the treatment of choice. Endovascular repair of isolated CIA aneurysms with no proximal neck is safe and successful using the SAKE stenting technique with VBX adequately flared and it represents effective and minimally invasive alternative to aortobiliac endograft implantation in the treatment of these aneurysms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report which describes this approach in the treatment of IIAA with no adequate proximal landing zone. Our approach overcomes the need to aortic bifurcation graft implantation and reduces procedure time, contrast dose and radiation exposure. It also preserves relevant collaterals vessels thanks to inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries sparing. A proximal aortic bifurcation endograft allows proximal sealing to be regained. Large population study with longer follow-up are needed to establish this approach as a new standard.

背景:孤立性髂动脉瘤(IIAA)并不常见。它占所有患者的 0.03%,占所有腹部动脉瘤的 2%。血管内方法是大多数 IIAA 患者的首选治疗方法。我们报告了对无近端着床区的髂动脉瘤进行同步髂主动脉吻合血管内支架(S.A.K.E.)覆盖式治疗的经验:这是一项回顾性分析,研究对象是 9 名连续接受血管内吻合覆盖支架(Gore®Viabahn®VBX)手术的无近端着床区 IIAA 患者。动脉瘤中位直径为 4.1 厘米,近端颈部中位长度为 3 毫米。在 3/9 个涉及髂内动脉的动脉瘤中,髂内动脉的起源在栓塞后被覆盖,并放置了延伸至髂外动脉(EIA)的支架移植。所有支架均用半顺应性球囊扩张:结果:所有病例都排除了髂动脉瘤(100%),没有支架移位或内漏的记录。手术时间中位数为 28 分钟,透视时间中位数为 9 分钟,造影剂用量中位数为 70 毫升。在中位 24 个月的随访中,所有患者均健在,未发现内漏或移位、感染、远端栓塞和肢体缺失。1/9的髂内动脉栓塞患者出现中度臀部跛行。6/9例患者的动脉瘤囊在1年后缩小:讨论:血管内治疗髂内动脉瘤的案例在文献中已有报道,并被证实是安全和成功的。IAA通常会逐渐扩张,最终导致破裂。足够长的近端和远端着床区是取得较好疗效的最重要特征。短近端颈部(˂10 毫米)是髂动脉瘤治疗的真正挑战,如今,经典的分叉髂主动脉内移植物部署是治疗的首选。使用 SAKE 支架技术,在 VBX 充分扩张的情况下,对没有近端颈部的孤立 CIA 动脉瘤进行血管内修复是安全和成功的,它是治疗这些动脉瘤的主动脉髂内移植物植入术的有效和微创替代方法。据我们所知,这是第一份描述这种方法用于治疗没有适当近端着床区的 IIAA 的报告。我们的方法克服了植入主动脉分叉移植物的需要,减少了手术时间、造影剂剂量和辐射暴露。由于疏通了肠系膜下动脉和腰动脉,它还保留了相关的旁支血管。近端主动脉分叉内植物可恢复近端密封。要将这种方法确立为新的标准,还需要进行大规模的人群研究和更长时间的随访。
{"title":"Simultaneous aortoiliac kissing Endovascular stenting for management of isolated monolateral common iliac artery aneurysm with no proximal landing zone.","authors":"Roberto Gabrielli, Andrea Siani, Gianluca Smedile, Anna Rita Rizzo, Roberto Antonelli, Gennaro De Vivo, Federico Accrocca, Stefano Bartoli","doi":"10.1177/17085381231193793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231193793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IIAA) is an uncommon finding. It, accounts for 0.03% of all patients and 2% of all abdominal aneurysm. Endovascular approach represents the treatment of choice for most patients with IIAA. We reported our experience on iliac aneurysm with no proximal landing zone by simultaneous aortoiliac kissing endovascular (S.A.K.E.) covered stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of nine consecutive patients with IIAA with no proximal landing zone, who underwent endovascular kissing covered stenting (Gore<sup>®</sup>Viabahn<sup>®</sup>VBX) The median aneurysm diameter was 4.1 cm, with a median 3-mm proximal neck length. In 3/9 aneurysms involving the internal iliac arteries the origin of the internal iliac artery was covered after its embolization and a stent graft extending to the external iliac artery (EIA) was placed. All stents were flared with semi-compliant balloon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Iliac aneurysm exclusion was obtained in all cases (100%), no graft migration or endo-leak were recorded. The median operative time was 28 min; the median fluoroscopy time was 9 min and a median 70 mL of contrast was used. At a median 24-month follow-up, all patients are alive, and no endo-leak or migration, infection, distal embolization, limb loss were observed. Moderate buttock claudication was experienced in 1/9 patients with internal iliac artery embolization. In 6/9 patients a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac was recorded after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Endovascular management of IIAAs cases has been reported in literature and it was confirmed to be safe and successful. The IAA usually progresses into expansion which eventually leads into rupture. Adequate long proximal and distal landing zones were the most important feature related to better outcomes. Short proximal neck (˂10 mm) represents a real challenge for iliac aneurysm treatment and, nowadays, a classical bifurcated aortoiliac endograft deployment represents the treatment of choice. Endovascular repair of isolated CIA aneurysms with no proximal neck is safe and successful using the SAKE stenting technique with VBX adequately flared and it represents effective and minimally invasive alternative to aortobiliac endograft implantation in the treatment of these aneurysms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report which describes this approach in the treatment of IIAA with no adequate proximal landing zone. Our approach overcomes the need to aortic bifurcation graft implantation and reduces procedure time, contrast dose and radiation exposure. It also preserves relevant collaterals vessels thanks to inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries sparing. A proximal aortic bifurcation endograft allows proximal sealing to be regained. Large population study with longer follow-up are needed to establish this approach as a new standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1364-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9940378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FGF21 promotes angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. FGF21通过PI3K/AKT/mTOR途径促进血管紧张素II诱发的腹主动脉瘤。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231192688
Xuefeng Gu, Qi Li, Tianwei Qian, Qi Hu, Jianfeng Gu, Wei Ding, Ming Li, Ming Wang, Huan Lu, Ke Tao

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal vascular disorder with a high mortality rate. It was previously reported that fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) was highly expressed in AAA patients. Nonetheless, its underlying mechanism in AAA progression is unclarified.

Methods: Angiotensin II (Ang-II) was used to induce AAA in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) and mouse models. Western blotting and RT-qPCR were utilized for measuring protein and RNA levels. Immunofluorescence staining was utilized for detecting LC3B expression in HASMCs. Elastica van Gieson staining was conducted for histological analysis of the abdominal aortas of mice.

Results: FGF21 displayed a high level in Ang-II-stimulated HASMCs and AAA mice. FGF21 depletion ameliorated abdominal aorta dilation and Ang-II-triggered pathological changes in mice. FGF21 silencing hindered autophagy and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Conclusions: FGF21 contributes to AAA progression by enhancing autophagy and activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是一种潜在的致命性血管疾病,死亡率很高。此前有报道称,成纤维细胞生长因子 21(FGF21)在 AAA 患者中高表达。然而,FGF21在AAA进展中的潜在机制尚未明确:方法:使用血管紧张素 II(Ang-II)诱导人主动脉血管平滑肌细胞(HASMCs)和小鼠模型中的 AAA。方法:利用血管紧张素 II(Ang-II)诱导人主动脉血管平滑肌细胞(HASMCs)和小鼠模型中的 AAA。免疫荧光染色用于检测 HASMCs 中 LC3B 的表达。用 Elastica van Gieson 染色法对小鼠腹主动脉进行组织学分析:结果:FGF21在Ang-II刺激的HASMCs和AAA小鼠中显示出较高水平。结果:FGF21 在 Ang-II 刺激的 HASMCs 和 AAA 小鼠中显示出较高的水平。FGF21沉默阻碍了自噬和PI3K/AKT/mTOR通路:结论:FGF21通过增强自噬和激活PI3K/AKT/mTOR通路促进AAA的进展。
{"title":"FGF21 promotes angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.","authors":"Xuefeng Gu, Qi Li, Tianwei Qian, Qi Hu, Jianfeng Gu, Wei Ding, Ming Li, Ming Wang, Huan Lu, Ke Tao","doi":"10.1177/17085381231192688","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231192688","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal vascular disorder with a high mortality rate. It was previously reported that fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) was highly expressed in AAA patients. Nonetheless, its underlying mechanism in AAA progression is unclarified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Angiotensin II (Ang-II) was used to induce AAA in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) and mouse models. Western blotting and RT-qPCR were utilized for measuring protein and RNA levels. Immunofluorescence staining was utilized for detecting LC3B expression in HASMCs. Elastica van Gieson staining was conducted for histological analysis of the abdominal aortas of mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FGF21 displayed a high level in Ang-II-stimulated HASMCs and AAA mice. FGF21 depletion ameliorated abdominal aorta dilation and Ang-II-triggered pathological changes in mice. FGF21 silencing hindered autophagy and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FGF21 contributes to AAA progression by enhancing autophagy and activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1369-1377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10274201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A sex-based analysis of 5-year outcomes following stenting for the treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease. 基于性别的髂主动脉闭塞症支架术后 5 年疗效分析。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231194152
Bibombe Patrice Mwipatayi, Ian Patrick Barry, Joseph Hanna, Reane Macarulay, Jackie Wong, Shannon Thomas, Vikram Vijayan, Vikram Puttaswamy, Natalie C Ward

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex on mid-term outcomes following stenting for aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

Methods: The Covered versus Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) compared the safety and efficacy of the covered stent (CS) with those of the bare metal stent (BMS) in the treatment of hemodynamically significant AIOD. It was identified that CS provided a significant benefit. The primary endpoint of our analysis was the rate of primary patency 5 years following stenting for AIOD (inclusive of both CS and BMS) in both sexes.

Results: Of the 168 lesions treated, 103 (61%) were present in men and 65 (39%) were present in women. Of the concomitant comorbidities, diabetes mellitus was significantly more common in women (17.5% vs 41.5%, p = .006). Although chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) at the time of intervention was more common in women, the difference was not significant (16.5% vs 24.6%, p = .395). Sex was not associated with the primary patency rate (male; 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-2.19, p = .543). When considering both male sex and the utilization of BMS, no significant impact was found on the primary patency rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.43, 95% CI: 0.69-17.10, p = .133). All-cause mortality at 60 months was 22.6% in men compared to 19.4% in women (p = .695).

Conclusions: No significant difference was identified in the primary patency rate between the sexes. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain whether sex-specific interventional guidelines are required in this regard.

研究目的本研究旨在评估性别对髂主动脉闭塞症(AIOD)支架置入术后中期疗效的影响:覆盖型与球囊扩张型支架试验(COBEST)比较了覆盖型支架(CS)与裸金属支架(BMS)在治疗血流动力学显著性髂主动脉闭塞症方面的安全性和有效性。结果表明,CS 具有显著疗效。我们分析的主要终点是支架治疗AIOD(包括CS和BMS)后5年的一次通畅率,男女均包括在内:在接受治疗的 168 个病变中,男性 103 例(61%),女性 65 例(39%)。在并发症中,女性患糖尿病的比例明显更高(17.5% vs 41.5%,P = .006)。虽然女性在接受介入治疗时更常见慢性肢体缺血(CLTI),但差异并不显著(16.5% vs 24.6%,p = .395)。性别与初次通畅率无关(男性;0.70,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.23-2.19,P = .543)。如果同时考虑男性性别和使用 BMS 的情况,则发现对初次通畅率没有显著影响(危险比 [HR]:3.43,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.69-17.10,P = .133)。60个月的全因死亡率男性为22.6%,女性为19.4%(P = .695):结论:在初次通畅率方面,男女之间没有明显差异。在这方面,是否需要制定针对不同性别的介入治疗指南,还需要进一步研究。
{"title":"A sex-based analysis of 5-year outcomes following stenting for the treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease.","authors":"Bibombe Patrice Mwipatayi, Ian Patrick Barry, Joseph Hanna, Reane Macarulay, Jackie Wong, Shannon Thomas, Vikram Vijayan, Vikram Puttaswamy, Natalie C Ward","doi":"10.1177/17085381231194152","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231194152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex on mid-term outcomes following stenting for aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Covered versus Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) compared the safety and efficacy of the covered stent (CS) with those of the bare metal stent (BMS) in the treatment of hemodynamically significant AIOD. It was identified that CS provided a significant benefit. The primary endpoint of our analysis was the rate of primary patency 5 years following stenting for AIOD (inclusive of both CS and BMS) in both sexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 168 lesions treated, 103 (61%) were present in men and 65 (39%) were present in women. Of the concomitant comorbidities, diabetes mellitus was significantly more common in women (17.5% vs 41.5%, <i>p</i> = .006). Although chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) at the time of intervention was more common in women, the difference was not significant (16.5% vs 24.6%, <i>p</i> = .395). Sex was not associated with the primary patency rate (male; 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-2.19, <i>p</i> = .543). When considering both male sex and the utilization of BMS, no significant impact was found on the primary patency rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.43, 95% CI: 0.69-17.10, <i>p</i> = .133). All-cause mortality at 60 months was 22.6% in men compared to 19.4% in women (<i>p</i> = .695).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was identified in the primary patency rate between the sexes. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain whether sex-specific interventional guidelines are required in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1403-1409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10001130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thoracic aortic aneurysms, a single center's 10-years experience and analysis of outcomes. 胸主动脉瘤,一个中心的 10 年经验和疗效分析。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI: 10.1177/17085381241236575
Leonor Baldaia, Mariana Duque, Miguel Silva, Eduardo Silva, Celso Nunes, Vânia Constâncio, Luís Orelhas, Manuel Fonseca, Luís F Antunes

Introduction: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results: We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, p = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; p = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (p = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (p = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.

Conclusions: TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.

导言:胸主动脉瘤(TAAs)是一种日益普遍的病理现象,其相关发病率和死亡率都很高。胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)是主要的治疗方法。本研究的目的是分析一个中心在治疗 TAAs 方面的经验,并找出导致治疗效果变差的可能风险因素:我们对本机构的数据库进行了回顾性审查,以确定从2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日这10年间接受TAAs治疗的所有患者。数据提取自患者的医疗记录。主要结果是全因死亡率,次要结果是手术相关的发病率(血管通路并发症、髓腔缺血、中风、内漏、移位、动脉瘤囊增大 >5 mm),以及随访 1、6 和 12 个月时是否需要再次手术。对数据进行了描述性和推论性分析。统计分析采用 IBM 社会科学统计软件包 (SPSS) 软件进行:在此期间,我们共发现了 34 名接受 TAAs 治疗的患者。平均年龄为 68 岁 [47-87],79.4% 的患者为男性。动脉瘤的平均直径为 63 毫米 [35-100],55.9% 为纺锤形,44.1% 为囊状。大多数动脉瘤(91.2%)位于降胸主动脉,其中 3 个(8.8%)延伸至主动脉弓。最常见的病因是退行性病变,有 22 名患者(64.7%),其次是主动脉夹层,有 8 名患者(23.5%)。19名患者(61.3%)进行了选择性手术,12名患者(38.7%)进行了紧急修复。24名患者(77.4%)选择了TEVAR治疗,其余7名患者(22.6%)接受了混合手术治疗。平均住院时间为 10 天 [2-80] (选择性修复为 6 天,紧急修复为 16 天,P = .016)。随访时间从1个月到10年不等。随访一年后,全因死亡率为 15%,发病率为 30%(其中 6 名患者(22%)出现 Ia 型内漏),需要再次手术的比例为 22%。动脉瘤直径是导致手术相关发病率的重要风险因素(中位直径为 73.5 毫米,而无发病率患者的中位直径为 56.0 毫米;P = 0.027)。Ia 型内漏与较高的再介入率显著相关(p = .001),但与较高的死亡率无关(p = .515)。年龄、女性性别、病因和紧急修复与结果的显著差异无关:结论:TEVAR被证明是治疗TAAs的有效方法,短期和中期随访结果良好。TAAs应及早诊断,并在符合标准时及时治疗,以防止恶化的结果。
{"title":"Thoracic aortic aneurysms, a single center's 10-years experience and analysis of outcomes.","authors":"Leonor Baldaia, Mariana Duque, Miguel Silva, Eduardo Silva, Celso Nunes, Vânia Constâncio, Luís Orelhas, Manuel Fonseca, Luís F Antunes","doi":"10.1177/17085381241236575","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381241236575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, <i>p</i> = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; <i>p</i> = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (<i>p</i> = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (<i>p</i> = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1398-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accurate Embolization for Endoleak after F-TEVAR of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Detachable Coils. 用可拆卸线圈为胸主动脉夹层 F-TEVAR 术后的内漏进行精确栓塞
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231154354
Tianze Xu, Yi Jin, Tao Tang, Yuanhao Tong, Chen Liu, Tong Qiao, Min Zhou, Tong Yu, Wei Wang, Ming Zhang, Feng Ran, Changjian Liu, Chao Wang, Yinhuan Shi, Wendong Li, Xiaoqiang Li, Zhao Liu

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of accurate embolization of endoleaks after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F-TEVAR) for thoracic aortic dissections.

Methods: Twenty patients with endoleaks (17 type I and 3 type II) after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F-TEVAR) were embolized using detachable and ordinary coils. We assessed the success rate and complications of the operation, and its effects, through clinical and CT follow-up.

Results: The mean clinical follow-up duration was 25.68 ± 11.07 months (3-44 months). During follow-up, all endoleaks were completely embolized and aortic remodeling was improved. Secondary endoleaks occurred in four patients who were embolized twice. No other complications or death were reported.

Conclusion: Embolization using detachable and ordinary coils is effective and safe for the treatment of endoleaks after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

目的评估对胸主动脉夹层进行开窗胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(F-TEVAR)后内漏进行精确栓塞的疗效和临床结果:我们使用可拆卸线圈和普通线圈对20例进行了栓塞治疗(17例I型,3例II型)。我们通过临床和 CT 随访评估了手术的成功率、并发症及其影响:平均临床随访时间为(25.68 ± 11.07)个月(3-44 个月)。随访期间,所有内漏均被完全栓塞,主动脉重塑得到改善。有四名患者发生了二次内膜栓塞,他们被栓塞了两次。没有其他并发症或死亡报告:结论:使用可拆卸线圈和普通线圈栓塞治疗胸腔主动脉瓣修复术后的内漏既有效又安全。
{"title":"Accurate Embolization for Endoleak after F-TEVAR of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Detachable Coils.","authors":"Tianze Xu, Yi Jin, Tao Tang, Yuanhao Tong, Chen Liu, Tong Qiao, Min Zhou, Tong Yu, Wei Wang, Ming Zhang, Feng Ran, Changjian Liu, Chao Wang, Yinhuan Shi, Wendong Li, Xiaoqiang Li, Zhao Liu","doi":"10.1177/17085381231154354","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231154354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of accurate embolization of endoleaks after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F-TEVAR) for thoracic aortic dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with endoleaks (17 type I and 3 type II) after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F-TEVAR) were embolized using detachable and ordinary coils. We assessed the success rate and complications of the operation, and its effects, through clinical and CT follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean clinical follow-up duration was 25.68 ± 11.07 months (3-44 months). During follow-up, all endoleaks were completely embolized and aortic remodeling was improved. Secondary endoleaks occurred in four patients who were embolized twice. No other complications or death were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Embolization using detachable and ordinary coils is effective and safe for the treatment of endoleaks after fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1378-1384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10302467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores. 在伤口和足部感染评分较低的患者中,抗血栓治疗的增加与肢体重大不良事件的减少有关。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-06 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231193506
Chien Yi Maximilian Png, Jenna G Beardsley, Mitri K Khoury, Sujin Lee, Katherine L Morrow, Tiffany R Bellomo, Sunita D Srivastava, Anahita Dua

Introduction: The optimal anti-thrombotic management of patients after lower extremity bypass has yet to be fully elucidated, in part due to significant heterogeneity in patient presentation and practice patterns. The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score is a validated scoring system to assist in the management of patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that performing a restriction analysis based on WIFI scores would assist in the postoperative anti-thrombotic management of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of infrainguinal bypass procedures completed at a single hospital system between January 2018 and January 2021 was selected, and preoperative WIfI scores were extracted for each patient. Patients with either Wound scores of 2 and 3, or Ischemia Scores of 0 and 1, or Foot Infection Scores of 3 were excluded. Based on the type of anti-thrombotic regimen on discharge, demographics, comorbidities, type of bypass, 30-day rates of graft occlusion, major amputation, mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi square tests, and time-to-event survival analysis.

Results: 230 procedures were included in the study. 69 (30.0%) patients were discharged on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), compared to 161 (70.0%) who were discharged on either dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation (DAPT/AC). There was a higher prevalence of bypasses using prosthetic conduit in the DAPT/AC group (45.9 vs 31.8%, p = .047); no other demographic or procedural variable analyzed had any significant differences. At 30-days postoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative reintervention rates, however, the DAPT/AC group had significantly lower rates of mortality (1.2 vs 7.2%, p = .01), major amputation (1.2% vs 5.8%, p = .04), and MALE (3.7 vs 13.0%, p < .01). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications. Survival analysis demonstrated that MALE-free survival was higher in the DAPT/AC group compared to the SAPT group (p < .01). On Cox regression analysis, DAPT/AC was associated with significantly decreased rates of MALE + mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.20 [0.06 - 0.66]).

Conclusion: Lower extremity bypasses patients with low Wound and low foot Infection scores who are discharged on DAPT/AC postoperatively have a significantly higher 30-day MALE-free survival rate compared to patients discharged on SAPT; consideration could be made to preferentially discharge such post-bypass patients on DAPT/AC.

导言:下肢搭桥术后患者的最佳抗血栓治疗方法尚未完全阐明,部分原因是患者的表现和实践模式存在显著差异。伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)评分是一个经过验证的评分系统,用于协助管理慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者。我们假设,根据 WIFI 评分进行限制分析将有助于对接受腹股沟下搭桥术的患者进行术后抗血栓治疗:选取了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在一家医院系统完成的腹股沟下搭桥术的回顾性队列,并提取了每位患者的术前 WIfI 评分。排除了伤口评分为 2 分和 3 分,或缺血评分为 0 分和 1 分,或足部感染评分为 3 分的患者。根据出院时抗血栓治疗方案的类型、人口统计学特征、合并症、搭桥类型、30 天移植物闭塞率、主要截肢率、死亡率和主要肢体不良事件(MALE)进行分析。统计分析包括 t 检验、卡方检验和时间-事件生存分析。69例(30.0%)患者出院时接受了单一抗血小板疗法(SAPT),而161例(70.0%)患者出院时接受了双重抗血小板疗法或抗凝疗法(DAPT/AC)。DAPT/AC组使用人工导管搭桥的比例更高(45.9% vs 31.8%,p = .047);其他人口统计学或手术变量分析均无显著差异。术后 30 天,DAPT/AC 组的术后再介入率没有显著差异,但死亡率(1.2% vs 7.2%,p = .01)、大截肢率(1.2% vs 5.8%,p = .04)和男性死亡率(3.7% vs 13.0%,p < .01)显著低于 DAPT/AC 组。出血并发症方面没有明显差异。生存分析表明,与 SAPT 组相比,DAPT/AC 组的男性无病生存率更高(p < .01)。根据 Cox 回归分析,DAPT/AC 与 MALE + 死亡率显著降低相关(危险比 (HR) 0.20 [0.06 - 0.66]):结论:与使用 SAPT 出院的患者相比,伤口评分和足部感染评分较低的下肢搭桥术患者术后使用 DAPT/AC 出院,其 30 天无并发症生存率明显更高;可考虑优先让此类下肢搭桥术后患者使用 DAPT/AC。
{"title":"Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores.","authors":"Chien Yi Maximilian Png, Jenna G Beardsley, Mitri K Khoury, Sujin Lee, Katherine L Morrow, Tiffany R Bellomo, Sunita D Srivastava, Anahita Dua","doi":"10.1177/17085381231193506","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231193506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal anti-thrombotic management of patients after lower extremity bypass has yet to be fully elucidated, in part due to significant heterogeneity in patient presentation and practice patterns. The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score is a validated scoring system to assist in the management of patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that performing a restriction analysis based on WIFI scores would assist in the postoperative anti-thrombotic management of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of infrainguinal bypass procedures completed at a single hospital system between January 2018 and January 2021 was selected, and preoperative WIfI scores were extracted for each patient. Patients with either Wound scores of 2 and 3, or Ischemia Scores of 0 and 1, or Foot Infection Scores of 3 were excluded. Based on the type of anti-thrombotic regimen on discharge, demographics, comorbidities, type of bypass, 30-day rates of graft occlusion, major amputation, mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi square tests, and time-to-event survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>230 procedures were included in the study. 69 (30.0%) patients were discharged on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), compared to 161 (70.0%) who were discharged on either dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation (DAPT/AC). There was a higher prevalence of bypasses using prosthetic conduit in the DAPT/AC group (45.9 vs 31.8%, <i>p</i> = .047); no other demographic or procedural variable analyzed had any significant differences. At 30-days postoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative reintervention rates, however, the DAPT/AC group had significantly lower rates of mortality (1.2 vs 7.2%, <i>p</i> = .01), major amputation (1.2% vs 5.8%, <i>p</i> = .04), and MALE (3.7 vs 13.0%, <i>p</i> < .01). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications. Survival analysis demonstrated that MALE-free survival was higher in the DAPT/AC group compared to the SAPT group (<i>p</i> < .01). On Cox regression analysis, DAPT/AC was associated with significantly decreased rates of MALE + mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.20 [0.06 - 0.66]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower extremity bypasses patients with low Wound and low foot Infection scores who are discharged on DAPT/AC postoperatively have a significantly higher 30-day MALE-free survival rate compared to patients discharged on SAPT; consideration could be made to preferentially discharge such post-bypass patients on DAPT/AC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1226-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9943427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation. 接受血管重建或截肢手术的外周动脉疾病患者的主要死因。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1177/17085381241236562
Stacey Telianidis, Sarah Joy Aitken

Objective: Preventing untimely death in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requires a detailed understanding of the predominant causes of death (COD). This literature review aims to describe how short- and long-term COD are reported in patients who had surgery for PAD.

Methods: A literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for articles reporting specific causes of mortality in patients who had surgery for all stages of PAD. Articles were included if they reported COD after open surgical or endovascular revascularisation, or major or minor amputation for PAD. Critical appraisals were conducted according to included study types, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools.

Results: Cause of death was reported in 21 publications. Twenty were observational and one was a randomised control trial. Study size ranged from 25 to 10,505 patients. Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent COD in perioperative periods (42.5% from 13 studies). Long-term follow-up ranged from 1 month and 7 years with 15 studies reporting cardiac related mortality as the most frequent cause of death. However, mortality from neoplasia, respiratory disease (including pneumonia and pulmonary emboli), stroke and sepsis were prevalent. Many studies were low-average quality, with few population-based observational studies.

Conclusion: Whilst cardiovascular COD are the most prevalent reasons for mortality in patients with PAD, the proportion of patients dying from neoplasia and respiratory disease is high. Improved reporting standards for COD in studies examining PAD are needed.

目的:防止外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者过早死亡需要详细了解主要死亡原因(COD)。本文献综述旨在描述如何报告因 PAD 而接受手术的患者的短期和长期死因:方法:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对报告PAD各期手术患者特定死因的文章进行文献综述。如果文章报告了开放性手术或血管内再通术后的死亡率,或因 PAD 而进行大截肢或小截肢后的死亡率,则将其纳入研究范围。根据纳入的研究类型,采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的工具进行严格评估:结果:21 篇文献报告了死亡原因。其中 20 篇为观察性研究,1 篇为随机对照试验。研究规模从 25 到 10,505 名患者不等。心血管疾病是围手术期最常见的慢性疾病(13 项研究中占 42.5%)。长期随访时间从 1 个月到 7 年不等,其中 15 项研究报告称与心脏相关的死亡是最常见的死因。然而,肿瘤、呼吸系统疾病(包括肺炎和肺栓塞)、中风和败血症也是常见的死亡原因。许多研究的质量不高,很少有基于人群的观察性研究:结论:虽然心血管 COD 是 PAD 患者最常见的死亡原因,但死于肿瘤和呼吸系统疾病的患者比例也很高。在研究 PAD 的过程中,需要改进 COD 的报告标准。
{"title":"The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation.","authors":"Stacey Telianidis, Sarah Joy Aitken","doi":"10.1177/17085381241236562","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381241236562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preventing untimely death in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requires a detailed understanding of the predominant causes of death (COD). This literature review aims to describe how short- and long-term COD are reported in patients who had surgery for PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for articles reporting specific causes of mortality in patients who had surgery for all stages of PAD. Articles were included if they reported COD after open surgical or endovascular revascularisation, or major or minor amputation for PAD. Critical appraisals were conducted according to included study types, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cause of death was reported in 21 publications. Twenty were observational and one was a randomised control trial. Study size ranged from 25 to 10,505 patients. Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent COD in perioperative periods (42.5% from 13 studies). Long-term follow-up ranged from 1 month and 7 years with 15 studies reporting cardiac related mortality as the most frequent cause of death. However, mortality from neoplasia, respiratory disease (including pneumonia and pulmonary emboli), stroke and sepsis were prevalent. Many studies were low-average quality, with few population-based observational studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst cardiovascular COD are the most prevalent reasons for mortality in patients with PAD, the proportion of patients dying from neoplasia and respiratory disease is high. Improved reporting standards for COD in studies examining PAD are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1276-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139973730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review. 外周动脉疾病治疗时血小板反应性高:一项系统综述。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-11 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231214324
Lauren N Goncalves, Veerle van Velze, Frederikus A Klok, Pim Gal, Rimke C Vos, Jaap F Hamming, Koen E A van der Bogt

Objectives: To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.

Methods: A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.

Results: A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.

Conclusion: No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

目的:强调目前有关PAD患者高治疗期血小板反应性(HTPR)的测量方法和患病率的证据,并评估HTPR与PAD患者复发性不良心血管和肢体事件之间的关系。方法:系统回顾有关PAD患者HTPR的英文文献。于2021年5月对PubMed和Medline进行了电子文献检索。结果:共纳入29项研究,共纳入11,201例PAD患者。氯吡格雷治疗期间PAD患者的HTPR为9.8 - 77%,阿司匹林治疗期间为4.1 - 50%。HTPR与不良临床结果相关。在使用氯吡格雷期间,HTPR患者对肢体血运重建的需求更高。同样,PAD人群使用阿司匹林期间的HTPR可预测心血管不良事件(HR 3.73;95% ci, 1.43-9.81;P = .007)。广泛的技术应用于测量血小板阻力,没有共识的临界值。此外,不同的患者群体、各种抗血小板方案和不同的临床终点突出了本综述中纳入的研究的高度异质性。结论:对HTPR检测的技术和临界值尚未达成共识。与抗血小板治疗敏感的患者相比,HTPR患者发生肢体相关不良事件和心血管事件的潜在风险更大,这说明临床实施HTPR检测的必要性。未来的研究必须以一致的方法论为目标。基于HTPR结果的抗血小板治疗适应性需要进一步探索。
{"title":"High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review.","authors":"Lauren N Goncalves, Veerle van Velze, Frederikus A Klok, Pim Gal, Rimke C Vos, Jaap F Hamming, Koen E A van der Bogt","doi":"10.1177/17085381231214324","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17085381231214324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; <i>p</i> = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89719729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vascular
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1