首页 > 最新文献

Wildlife Monographs最新文献

英文 中文
Issue Information – Editorial Board 发行信息-编辑委员会
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1038
{"title":"Issue Information – Editorial Board","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5827322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Issue Information – Cover 发行资料-封面
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1036
{"title":"Issue Information – Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5770260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dedication page/photo 奉献页面/照片
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2017-06-26 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1027
{"title":"Dedication page/photo","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2017-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5819826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of control on the dynamics of an adjacent protected wolf population in interior Alaska 控制对阿拉斯加内陆邻近受保护狼种群动态的影响
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2017-06-26 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1026
Joshua H. Schmidt, John W. Burch, Margaret C. MacCluskie

Long-term wolf (Canis lupus) research programs have provided many insights into wolf population dynamics. Understanding the mechanisms controlling responses of wolf populations to changes in density, environmental conditions, and human-caused mortality are important as wolf management becomes increasingly intensive. Competition with humans for ungulate prey has led to large-scale wolf control programs, particularly in Alaska, and although wolf populations may sustain relatively high (e.g., 22–29%) rates of conventional harvest, control programs are specifically designed to have lasting population-level effects.

Understanding the broader impacts of wolf control efforts on the surrounding area is of particular concern for conservation agencies such as the United States National Park Service, whose mandates generally preclude the artificial reduction of populations of native predators, particularly for the primary purpose of increasing available prey biomass for human harvest. Detailed assessments of the factors influencing population vital rates (i.e., survival, natality, dispersal) and population trajectory in the context of control efforts are critical for understanding complex ecological relationships between wolves and their prey and informing management of each. Using a long-term dataset and a powerful new integrated modeling approach, we assessed the effects of wolf control on the dynamics of a monitored wolf population residing primarily within an adjacent protected area where wolf control activities were prohibited.

We monitored wolf population dynamics in Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve (YUCH) in interior Alaska, USA for 22 years (1993–2014). During our study, 2 large-scale wolf control programs were implemented in the surrounding area with the primary goal of increasing the size of the Fortymile caribou herd. We used known-fate data based on relocations of marked wolves and repeated counts of associated pack mates to estimate survival, dispersal, and natality rates. We jointly analyzed these data using an integrated modeling approach, thereby providing inference to the entire resident, pack-dwelling population of wolves using YUCH. Apparent survival (i.e., including mortalities and dispersals) was lower in the study area during the lethal control period, indicating a direct additive effect of control despite the prohibition of control efforts inside YUCH boundaries. Apparent survival was higher in years following winters with above-average snowfall, corresponding with a predicted increase in ungulate prey vulnerability the following year. Extraterritorial forays were associated with lower apparent survival rates, particularly after the initiation of lethal wolf control in the surrounding area. In general, mortalities tended to occur evenly throughout the year, whe

长期的狼(Canis lupus)研究项目提供了许多关于狼种群动态的见解。随着狼的管理变得越来越密集,了解控制狼种群对密度、环境条件和人为死亡率变化的反应机制非常重要。与人类争夺有蹄类猎物的竞争导致了大规模的狼控制计划,特别是在阿拉斯加,尽管狼的种群数量可能维持相对较高的常规收获率(例如22-29%),但控制计划的设计是为了在种群水平上产生持久的影响。了解狼控制工作对周边地区的更广泛影响是美国国家公园管理局等保护机构特别关心的问题,它们的任务通常排除人为减少本地捕食者的数量,特别是为了增加可供人类收获的猎物生物量。在控制努力的背景下,对影响种群活力率(即生存、出生、扩散)和种群轨迹的因素进行详细评估,对于理解狼与其猎物之间复杂的生态关系并为各自的管理提供信息至关重要。利用长期数据集和强大的新型综合建模方法,我们评估了狼控制对主要居住在禁止狼控制活动的邻近保护区内的监测狼种群动态的影响。本文对美国阿拉斯加州育空-查理河国家自然保护区(YUCH)狼种群动态进行了22年(1993-2014)的监测。在我们的研究中,在周边地区实施了2个大规模的狼控制计划,主要目标是增加40英里驯鹿群的规模。我们使用了已知命运的数据,这些数据是基于有标记的狼的迁移和相关狼群同伴的重复计数来估计生存、分散和死亡率。我们使用综合建模方法对这些数据进行了联合分析,从而使用YUCH对整个居住的狼群种群进行了推断。在致命控制期间,研究区域的表观存活率(即包括死亡率和分散)较低,表明尽管禁止在育成区内进行控制,但控制的直接加性效应仍然存在。在降雪量高于平均水平的冬季之后的几年里,表观存活率更高,这与次年有蹄动物猎物脆弱性的预测增加相对应。域外攻击与较低的表观存活率相关,特别是在周围地区开始致命狼控制之后。总的来说,全年的死亡率趋于均匀,而在冬末和早春期间,分散率增加。在我们所有年龄段(不包括已知的繁殖者)的有圈样本中,分散约占观察到的损失的一半,尽管一岁的幼崽最有可能分散。在这两个狼群控制项目中,狼密度持续下降也使我们能够直接评估密度降低对生命率的影响。在每个控制项目的过程中,狼的出生率(5 - 8月间每个狼群增加的估计个体数量)急剧增加,表明对周围地区狼密度的大规模减少有强烈的繁殖反应。两个控制项目之间的出生率迅速下降,进一步支持了这一结论。在接下来的一年里,较小的族群规模和已知繁殖者的减少与较低的族群出生率有关,这表明人类造成的死亡可能会通过减少族群规模和移除繁殖者而对生产力产生直接的短期影响。然而,尽管控制可以在短期内降低单个狼群的繁殖力,邻近种群通过提高出生率迅速对狼密度的减少做出反应。基于狼群中有标记个体迁移的狼密度估计依赖于样本量,不能可靠地估计种群增长率(λ)。作为替代方案,我们开发了一个新的度量,λ*,在假设狼种群的最小功能单位是一对繁殖对的情况下,评估出生是否足以抵消每年的种群损失。当λ*由于个体的丧失和群体的解散而降低到1.0以下时,目标种群有效地成为依赖周边地区移民维持的种群下沉。 根据λ*的估计,我们确定在实施致命狼控制之前的大多数年份,YUCH研究种群是周边地区狼的来源,但在实施致命狼控制之后,尽管禁止在YUCH内进行控制活动,但仍成为主要依赖周边地区移民的种群汇。这一发现对保护区的管理具有重要意义,特别是在阿拉斯加等地区,狼的控制通常在大的空间尺度上实施。我们期望λ*也能成为了解狼生态和管理其他地区种群的有用工具。总体而言,狼的生命率是动态的,对变化的条件反应迅速。在种群密度下降的情况下,狼的出生率迅速上升,这表明密度依赖性在调节狼的种群数量中起着重要作用。在分散和死亡率上的灵活性可能使狼种群对猎物资源、狼密度和死亡率的变化做出反应。这些发现还表明,可持续收获率取决于种群活力率的年度变化。管理方案在尤大附近地区的明显影响表明,有效保护保护区可能需要比通常采用的更积极的管理决策,特别是如果维持不变的系统动态是一个主要目标。©2017年出版。这篇文章是美国政府的作品,在美国属于公有领域。Wiley期刊公司代表野生动物协会出版的野生动物专著。
{"title":"Effects of control on the dynamics of an adjacent protected wolf population in interior Alaska","authors":"Joshua H. Schmidt,&nbsp;John W. Burch,&nbsp;Margaret C. MacCluskie","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1026","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Long-term wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) research programs have provided many insights into wolf population dynamics. Understanding the mechanisms controlling responses of wolf populations to changes in density, environmental conditions, and human-caused mortality are important as wolf management becomes increasingly intensive. Competition with humans for ungulate prey has led to large-scale wolf control programs, particularly in Alaska, and although wolf populations may sustain relatively high (e.g., 22–29%) rates of conventional harvest, control programs are specifically designed to have lasting population-level effects.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Understanding the broader impacts of wolf control efforts on the surrounding area is of particular concern for conservation agencies such as the United States National Park Service, whose mandates generally preclude the artificial reduction of populations of native predators, particularly for the primary purpose of increasing available prey biomass for human harvest. Detailed assessments of the factors influencing population vital rates (i.e., survival, natality, dispersal) and population trajectory in the context of control efforts are critical for understanding complex ecological relationships between wolves and their prey and informing management of each. Using a long-term dataset and a powerful new integrated modeling approach, we assessed the effects of wolf control on the dynamics of a monitored wolf population residing primarily within an adjacent protected area where wolf control activities were prohibited.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We monitored wolf population dynamics in Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve (YUCH) in interior Alaska, USA for 22 years (1993–2014). During our study, 2 large-scale wolf control programs were implemented in the surrounding area with the primary goal of increasing the size of the Fortymile caribou herd. We used known-fate data based on relocations of marked wolves and repeated counts of associated pack mates to estimate survival, dispersal, and natality rates. We jointly analyzed these data using an integrated modeling approach, thereby providing inference to the entire resident, pack-dwelling population of wolves using YUCH. Apparent survival (i.e., including mortalities and dispersals) was lower in the study area during the lethal control period, indicating a direct additive effect of control despite the prohibition of control efforts inside YUCH boundaries. Apparent survival was higher in years following winters with above-average snowfall, corresponding with a predicted increase in ungulate prey vulnerability the following year. Extraterritorial forays were associated with lower apparent survival rates, particularly after the initiation of lethal wolf control in the surrounding area. In general, mortalities tended to occur evenly throughout the year, whe","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2017-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5834588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Long-term demography of the Northern Goshawk in a variable environment 变化环境下北苍鹰的长期人口统计
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2017-04-26 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1023
Richard T. Reynolds, Jeffrey S. Lambert, Curtis H. Flather, Gary C. White, Benjamin J. Bird, L. Scott Baggett, Carrie Lambert, Shelley Bayard De Volo

The Nearctic northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillis) is a resident of conifer, broadleaf, and mixed forests from the boreal to the southwestern montane regions of North America. We report on a 20-year mark-recapture investigation (1991–2010) of the distribution and density of breeders, temporal and spatial variability in breeding, nestling sex ratios, local versus immigrant recruitment of breeders, breeding age structure, age-specific survival rates, and rate of population change (λ) of this species on the Kaibab Plateau, a forested sky island in northern Arizona, USA. We used an information-theoretic approach to rank models representing alternative hypotheses about the influence of annual fluctuations in precipitation on the annual frequency of goshawk breeding and fledgling production. We studied 125 goshawk breeding territories, representing approximately 87% of an estimated 144 total territories based on a mean distance of 3.8 km between territory centers in a 1,728-km2 study area. The salient demographic feature of the population was extensive annual variation in breeding, which manifested as large inter-annual variation in proportions of pairs laying eggs, brood sizes, nest failure rates, and fledgling production. The percent of territories known in a prior year in which eggs were laid in a current year ranged from 8% to 86% ( = 37%, SE = 4.51), annual mean nest failure rate (active nests that failed) ranged from 12% to 48% (overall  = 23%, SE = 2.48), and mean annual brood size of successful nests (fledged ≥1 fledgling) ranged from 1.5 young to 2.5 young (overall  = 2.0 young, SE = 0.03). Inter-annual variation in reproduction closely tracked inter-annual variation in precipitation, which we hypothesize influenced primary forest productivity and bird and mammal prey abundance. The best breeding years (1992–1993, 77–87% of pairs laid eggs) were coincident with a record-long El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) wet period and the worst breeding year (2003; 8% of pairs laid eggs) was the last of a 3-year record drought. Overall breeding success was 83% with most failures occurring during incubation; once eggs hatched, goshawks tended to fledge young. The pooled 20-year nestling sex ratio did not differ from unity (53% M; n = 410 M, 366 F) but was significantly male-biased in 2 years and female-biased in 1 year. Nonetheless, the overall greater production of male fledglings followed a strong trend of greater male production in other goshawk populations, suggesting that breeders might have been adaptively adjusting their offspring sex ratio, perhaps to produce more of the rarer (male) sex. Annual recruitment of new individuals into the breeding population averaged 43% during the study. Study area recruitment rate of hawks locally born (in situ) and banded was 0.12. Both sexes had equal tendencies to return to the Kaibab Plateau to

新北极北部苍鹰(学名:Accipiter gentilis atricapillis)栖息在北美北部到西南山区的针叶林、阔叶林和混交林中。作者报告了在美国亚利桑那州北部的凯巴布高原(Kaibab Plateau)进行的一项为期20年的捕鸟调查(1991-2010),对该物种的繁殖者分布和密度、繁殖的时空变异性、雏鸟性别比、本地与外来繁殖者的招募、繁殖年龄结构、年龄特异性存活率和种群变化率(λ)进行了调查。我们使用信息论方法对模型进行排序,这些模型代表了降水年波动对苍鹰繁殖和羽翼产量的年频率影响的不同假设。我们研究了125个苍鹰繁殖地,在一个1728平方公里的研究区域中,根据区域中心之间的平均距离3.8公里,估计了144个区域,约占总数的87%。种群的显著人口统计学特征是繁殖的年际变化较大,表现为产卵对比例、雏鸟大小、筑巢失败率和雏鸟产量的年际变化较大。上一年已知的当年产卵区域的比例为8% ~ 86% (= 37%,SE = 4.51),年平均筑巢失败率(活动巢失败)为12% ~ 48%(总体= 23%,SE = 2.48),年平均成功巢(羽翼≥1只羽翼)的孵化量为1.5 ~ 2.5只(总体= 2.0只,SE = 0.03)。繁殖的年际变化与降水的年际变化密切相关,我们假设降水影响了原始森林生产力和鸟类和哺乳动物的猎物丰度。最好的繁殖年份(1992-1993年,产卵对的77-87%)与创纪录的El Niño-Southern涛动(ENSO)湿期一致;最差的繁殖年份(2003年);这是连续3年创纪录干旱的最后一次。总体育种成功率为83%,大多数失败发生在孵化期间;一旦蛋孵出,苍鹰往往会孵出雏鸟。合并20年的雏鸟性别比与统一组没有差异(53% M;n = 410 M, 366 F),但在2年内有显著的男性偏倚,在1年内有显著的女性偏倚。尽管如此,在其他苍鹰种群中,雄性雏鸟的总体产量较高,而雄性雏鸟的产量也较高,这表明繁殖者可能已经适应性地调整了它们后代的性别比例,也许是为了产生更多罕见的(雄性)性别。在研究期间,每年新个体进入繁殖种群的平均比例为43%。研究区本地出生(原位)和带状的鹰的招募率为0.12。两性返回凯巴布高原繁殖的倾向相同(在哲学上没有差异),两性之间的出生分散距离(出生到第一繁殖地)没有差异。在研究的最后几年(1999-2010年),估计46%的繁殖新兵是本地出生的,54%是来自遥远森林的移民。首次繁殖的最小年龄为2岁,已知年龄的雄鹰(雏鹰时被绑扎或首次繁殖时在羽毛上长大)首次繁殖的平均年龄为3.7岁,雌性为3.5岁。已知年龄的苍鹰的平均寿命(从雏鸟第一次佩戴到最后一次佩戴)男女均为6.9年。年龄≥4岁的种鸡,以首次捕获时的羽毛为基础,平均最小表观寿命为6.5年。首次被发现的苍鹰的平均年龄为3.9岁,当时雌雄苍鹰的表观存活率估计为0.77,略低于年龄函数的峰值存活率0.78。年龄特异性生存率估计显示,9岁后稳步下降,20岁时接近0。繁殖成虫λ估计值(M, 0.94, SE = 0.037;F, 0.98, SE = 0.038)仅提供了研究期间种群下降的微弱证据。尽管性别不在最高生存模型中,但包括年龄+性别在内的模型是竞争性的,表明雄性比雌性存活率低,这一发现在最高λ模型中得到了性别效应的证实。在漫长的繁殖季节,雄性是主要的觅食者,在植被茂密的环境中捕猎敏捷的猎物,这可能导致雄性存活率较低,死亡率较高。较低的存活率可以通过雄性雏鸟的频繁繁殖(53%)来弥补。严重程度高的冠火对人口构成了生存威胁。 在1991年之前的30年里,除了4次严重的大火烧毁了大约3770公顷(相当于3个苍鹰领地),在我们的研究期间,6次严重的大火烧毁了另外30945公顷,并杀死了8个已知领地的大部分森林(64%),可能还有2次在我们完成调查之前被烧毁。基于在年龄结构上缺乏任何近期的人口结构扰动,相对较高且时间恒定的年成鸟存活率,在成鸟λ估计附近的置信区间重叠1.0,以及研究区域饱和,我们推测在20年的研究中,凯巴布高原的苍鹰种群是稳定的。尽管如此,由于种群的繁殖频率呈下降趋势,非繁殖成虫的状态(死亡、存活、迁移)不确定,育种存在广泛的时空差异,以及凯巴布高原繁殖种群的高迁移频率,种群的未来状况仍然存在不确定性。如果长达一个世纪的降水下降持续下去,特别是以1980年以来的增加速度持续下去,并表现为更严重的干旱、更少的湿润期和更弱的森林生产力脉冲,那么凯巴布高原的苍鹰数量将显示出明确的下降证据。证据包括当地和区域苍鹰的繁殖和生存减少,迁徙频率减少,灾难性火灾导致栖息地进一步丧失。©2017野生动物协会。
{"title":"Long-term demography of the Northern Goshawk in a variable environment","authors":"Richard T. Reynolds,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Lambert,&nbsp;Curtis H. Flather,&nbsp;Gary C. White,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Bird,&nbsp;L. Scott Baggett,&nbsp;Carrie Lambert,&nbsp;Shelley Bayard De Volo","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1023","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Nearctic northern goshawk (<i>Accipiter gentilis atricapillis</i>) is a resident of conifer, broadleaf, and mixed forests from the boreal to the southwestern montane regions of North America. We report on a 20-year mark-recapture investigation (1991–2010) of the distribution and density of breeders, temporal and spatial variability in breeding, nestling sex ratios, local versus immigrant recruitment of breeders, breeding age structure, age-specific survival rates, and rate of population change (λ) of this species on the Kaibab Plateau, a forested sky island in northern Arizona, USA. We used an information-theoretic approach to rank models representing alternative hypotheses about the influence of annual fluctuations in precipitation on the annual frequency of goshawk breeding and fledgling production. We studied 125 goshawk breeding territories, representing approximately 87% of an estimated 144 total territories based on a mean distance of 3.8 km between territory centers in a 1,728-km<sup>2</sup> study area. The salient demographic feature of the population was extensive annual variation in breeding, which manifested as large inter-annual variation in proportions of pairs laying eggs, brood sizes, nest failure rates, and fledgling production. The percent of territories known in a prior year in which eggs were laid in a current year ranged from 8% to 86% ( = 37%, SE = 4.51), annual mean nest failure rate (active nests that failed) ranged from 12% to 48% (overall  = 23%, SE = 2.48), and mean annual brood size of successful nests (fledged ≥1 fledgling) ranged from 1.5 young to 2.5 young (overall  = 2.0 young, SE = 0.03). Inter-annual variation in reproduction closely tracked inter-annual variation in precipitation, which we hypothesize influenced primary forest productivity and bird and mammal prey abundance. The best breeding years (1992–1993, 77–87% of pairs laid eggs) were coincident with a record-long El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) wet period and the worst breeding year (2003; 8% of pairs laid eggs) was the last of a 3-year record drought. Overall breeding success was 83% with most failures occurring during incubation; once eggs hatched, goshawks tended to fledge young. The pooled 20-year nestling sex ratio did not differ from unity (53% M; <i>n</i> = 410 M, 366 F) but was significantly male-biased in 2 years and female-biased in 1 year. Nonetheless, the overall greater production of male fledglings followed a strong trend of greater male production in other goshawk populations, suggesting that breeders might have been adaptively adjusting their offspring sex ratio, perhaps to produce more of the rarer (male) sex. Annual recruitment of new individuals into the breeding population averaged 43% during the study. Study area recruitment rate of hawks locally born (<i>in situ</i>) and banded was 0.12. Both sexes had equal tendencies to return to the Kaibab Plateau to ","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5829005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Biological and social outcomes of antler point restriction harvest regulations for white-tailed deer 白尾鹿鹿角限制采收制度的生物学和社会效益
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2017-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1022
Bret D. Wallingford, Duane R. Diefenbach, Eric S. Long, Christopher S. Rosenberry, Gary L. Alt

Selective harvest criteria, such as antler point restrictions (APRs), have been used to regulate harvest of male ungulates; however, comprehensive evaluation of the biological and social responses to this management strategy is lacking. In 2002, Pennsylvania adopted new APRs for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) that required, depending on wildlife management unit, ≥3 or ≥4 points on 1 antler for legal harvest. Historically, harvest rates of subadult (1.5 yr old) and adult (≥2.5 yr old) antlered males averaged 0.80. Antler point restrictions were designed to protect ≥50% of subadult males from harvest. Most adult males remained legal for harvest. We estimated harvest rates, survival rates, and cause-specific mortality of radio-collared male deer (453 subadults, 103 adults) in 2 wildlife management units (Armstrong and Centre counties) to evaluate biological efficacy of APRs to increase recruitment of adult males during 2002–2005. We administered statewide deer hunter surveys before and after each hunting season over the same 3 years to evaluate hunter attitudes toward APRs. We conducted 2 types of surveys: a simple random sample of all license buyers for each survey and a longitudinal panel of hunters who completed all 6 surveys. At the same time APRs were implemented, the Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) increased antlerless harvests to reduce deer density to meet deer management goals.

Survival rates varied by month and age but not between study areas or among years after implementation of APRs. Monthly survival rates for subadults ranged from 0.64 to 0.97 during hunting seasons and 0.95 to 0.99 during the non-hunting period. Annual survival of subadults was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.41–0.52). Adult monthly survival rates ranged from 0.36 to 0.95 during hunting seasons and we had no mortalities during the non-hunting period. Annual survival of adults was 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22–0.35). Antler point restrictions successfully reduced harvest rate for subadults to 0.31 (95% CI = 0.23–0.38), and approximately 92% of these deer survived to the following hunting season. Vehicle collisions were the greatest source of mortality outside the hunting season for subadults and adults. Also, we observed decreased harvest rates for adults (0.59, 95% CI = 0.40–0.72), although nearly all were legal for harvest. Of radio-collared subadults, 6–11% were harvested with sub-legal antlers, indicating hunters generally complied with APRs. Overall, antlered harvest declined statewide and in our study areas, in part because of APRs but also because of increased antlerless harvests that reduced the statewide population from 1.49 million deer in 2000 to 1.14 million deer in 2005. However, between 2000 and 2005, harvest of adult males increased by 976 (112%) in Armstrong County, decreased by 29 (−3%) in Centre County, and increased by 14,285 (29%) statewide because

选择性采收标准,如鹿角限制(APRs),已被用于调节雄性有蹄类动物的采收;然而,缺乏对这一管理战略的生物和社会反应的综合评价。2002年,宾夕法尼亚州通过了新的白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)的APRs,根据野生动物管理单位的不同,要求合法收获的鹿角≥3或≥4分。历史上,亚成年(1.5岁)和成年(≥2.5岁)鹿角雄鹿的平均采收率为0.80。设计鹿角点限制是为了保护≥50%的亚成年雄鹿不被捕杀。大多数成年雄性仍然是合法的。在2002-2005年期间,我们估计了2个野生动物管理单位(Armstrong县和Centre县)无线电项圈公鹿(453只亚成年鹿,103只成年鹿)的收获率、存活率和原因特异性死亡率,以评估APRs增加成年公鹿招募的生物学效果。在相同的3年中,我们在每个狩猎季节前后进行了全州范围内的猎鹿人调查,以评估猎人对APRs的态度。我们进行了两种类型的调查:每次调查的所有许可证购买者的简单随机样本和完成所有6项调查的猎人纵向小组。在实施禁猎区的同时,宾夕法尼亚州狩猎委员会(PGC)增加了无角鹿的收成,以减少鹿的密度,以实现鹿的管理目标。生存率随月份和年龄的不同而不同,但在研究区域之间或实施APRs后的年份之间没有差异。亚成虫月存活率在狩猎季节为0.64 ~ 0.97,非狩猎期为0.95 ~ 0.99。亚成虫的年生存率为0.46 (95% CI = 0.41-0.52)。狩猎季节成虫月存活率为0.36 ~ 0.95,非狩猎期无死亡。成人年生存率为0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.35)。鹿角点限制成功地将亚成年鹿的采伐率降低到0.31 (95% CI = 0.23-0.38),约92%的这些鹿存活到下一个狩猎季节。除狩猎季节外,车辆碰撞是亚成虫和成虫死亡的最大原因。此外,我们观察到成年人的采伐率下降(0.59,95% CI = 0.40-0.72),尽管几乎所有的成年人都是合法采伐的。在带无线电项圈的亚成体中,6-11%的捕获鹿角是非法的,这表明猎人通常遵守了APRs。总体而言,在全州和我们的研究区域,鹿角的收获量下降,部分原因是由于保护区,但也因为无鹿角的收获量增加,使全州鹿群从2000年的149万头减少到2005年的114万头。然而,在2000年至2005年期间,阿姆斯特朗县成年雄性的收获量增加了976只(112%),中心县减少了29只(- 3%),而在全州范围内增加了14285只(29%),因为更多的雄性存活到3岁和4岁年龄段。来自随机抽样调查的猎人支持全州apr的比例在0.61 (95% CI = 0.59-0.64)和0.70 (95% CI = 0.66-0.73)之间变化。纵向专家组中支持保护区的猎人比例没有随着猎人在新条例下获得经验而增加;0.23人更支持,0.29人不支持,0.48人在3年后的同意水平不变。尽管在整个研究过程中有50%的猎人支持APRs,但对PGC鹿管理计划的支持有所下降;三年后,41%的纵向猎人对鹿管理计划的评价降低了,21%的人评价更高。我们认为APRs在生物学上是成功的,因为降低了亚成虫的采收率,增加了鹿角较大的成年雄鹿的采收。同样,由于大多数猎人在整个研究过程中都支持APRs,我们认为APRs在社会上是成功的。然而,我们预测在猎人经历了APRs的生物学结果后,APRs将越来越受欢迎,但支持的变化不大。我们认为猎人对apr的影响形成了初步印象,额外的经验和信息未能改变他们的看法。此外,为了适应种群中更多的雄性和满足机构的鹿种群目标,同时减少了鹿的总体密度,这可能进一步减少了对保护区的支持。我们发现,在宾夕法尼亚州实施的APRs是可执行的,猎人遵守,并成功地招募了更多的鹿角雄鹿到老年班级。为了促进社会对这些法规变化的接受,我们发现在这些变化实施之前获得支持可能很重要,因为大多数猎人在新法规实施3年后并没有改变他们对apr的看法。©2017野生动物协会。
{"title":"Biological and social outcomes of antler point restriction harvest regulations for white-tailed deer","authors":"Bret D. Wallingford,&nbsp;Duane R. Diefenbach,&nbsp;Eric S. Long,&nbsp;Christopher S. Rosenberry,&nbsp;Gary L. Alt","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1022","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Selective harvest criteria, such as antler point restrictions (APRs), have been used to regulate harvest of male ungulates; however, comprehensive evaluation of the biological and social responses to this management strategy is lacking. In 2002, Pennsylvania adopted new APRs for white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) that required, depending on wildlife management unit, ≥3 or ≥4 points on 1 antler for legal harvest. Historically, harvest rates of subadult (1.5 yr old) and adult (≥2.5 yr old) antlered males averaged 0.80. Antler point restrictions were designed to protect ≥50% of subadult males from harvest. Most adult males remained legal for harvest. We estimated harvest rates, survival rates, and cause-specific mortality of radio-collared male deer (453 subadults, 103 adults) in 2 wildlife management units (Armstrong and Centre counties) to evaluate biological efficacy of APRs to increase recruitment of adult males during 2002–2005. We administered statewide deer hunter surveys before and after each hunting season over the same 3 years to evaluate hunter attitudes toward APRs. We conducted 2 types of surveys: a simple random sample of all license buyers for each survey and a longitudinal panel of hunters who completed all 6 surveys. At the same time APRs were implemented, the Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) increased antlerless harvests to reduce deer density to meet deer management goals.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Survival rates varied by month and age but not between study areas or among years after implementation of APRs. Monthly survival rates for subadults ranged from 0.64 to 0.97 during hunting seasons and 0.95 to 0.99 during the non-hunting period. Annual survival of subadults was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.41–0.52). Adult monthly survival rates ranged from 0.36 to 0.95 during hunting seasons and we had no mortalities during the non-hunting period. Annual survival of adults was 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22–0.35). Antler point restrictions successfully reduced harvest rate for subadults to 0.31 (95% CI = 0.23–0.38), and approximately 92% of these deer survived to the following hunting season. Vehicle collisions were the greatest source of mortality outside the hunting season for subadults and adults. Also, we observed decreased harvest rates for adults (0.59, 95% CI = 0.40–0.72), although nearly all were legal for harvest. Of radio-collared subadults, 6–11% were harvested with sub-legal antlers, indicating hunters generally complied with APRs. Overall, antlered harvest declined statewide and in our study areas, in part because of APRs but also because of increased antlerless harvests that reduced the statewide population from 1.49 million deer in 2000 to 1.14 million deer in 2005. However, between 2000 and 2005, harvest of adult males increased by 976 (112%) in Armstrong County, decreased by 29 (−3%) in Centre County, and increased by 14,285 (29%) statewide because ","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5788586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Dedication 奉献
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2016-10-20 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1021
{"title":"Dedication","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2016-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5956065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nutritional ecology of elk during summer and autumn in the Pacific Northwest 西北太平洋地区夏季和秋季麋鹿的营养生态
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2016-10-20 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1020
John G. Cook, Rachel C. Cook, Ronald W. Davis, Larry L. Irwin

Elk (Cervus elaphus) in the western United States are an economically and socially valuable wildlife species. They have featured species status for federal land management planning; hence, considerable modeling focused on habitat evaluation and land management planning has been undertaken for elk. The extent to which these and other habitat models for large ungulates account for influences of nutritional resources varies greatly, probably because of varying recognition of the importance of nutrition and uncertainty about how to measure and model nutrition. Our primary goals were to 1) develop greater understanding of how habitat conditions influence foraging dynamics and nutrition of elk in summer and autumn; and 2) illustrate an ecological framework for evaluating and predicting nutritional resources so that nutritional needs of elk can be integrated within landscape-scale plans, population models, and habitat evaluation models. We evaluated foraging responses of elk to clearcut logging and commercial thinning, forest succession, and season across ecological site potentials. We also identified the extent to which plant communities satisfied nutritional requirements of lactating female elk and their calves. Our study was conducted in the temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest on industrial and public timberlands.

We evaluated relations between habitat conditions and elk nutrition in plant communities representing a range in stand age and ecological conditions at 3 study areas, 1 near the Canadian border in the north Cascades Mountains (Nooksack), 1 in the Coast range southwest of Olympia, Washington (Willapa Hills), and the third in the central Cascades near Springfield, Oregon (Springfield), from late June to November, 2000–2002. In 98–143 macroplots per study area, we measured forage abundance by plant species, digestible energy content by plant life-form group, and forest overstory. In a subset of these macroplots (∼30 per study area), we held 4 tame lactating elk with calves in electrified pens (n = 15–25 adult elk per year), and sampled activity budgets, dietary composition, forage selection, and other measures of foraging behavior; dietary digestible energy (DE; kcal/g) and protein (DP; %) levels; and intake rates of these nutrients. In 15 of these pens, we held elk for extended periods (13–21 days) to monitor changes in body fat of adults and growth of calves. We developed equations to predict dietary DE and DP and per-minute intake rates of each in a nutrition prediction model that reflected vegetation attributes and ecological site influences.

Total abundance of forage in the western hemlock series after clearcut logging in low to moderate elevations (≤1,000 m) ranged from a peak of 3,000–4,500 kg/ha in 5- to 10-year-old stands to 100–300 kg/ha in 20- to 50-year-old stands with onl

美国西部的麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)是一种具有经济和社会价值的野生动物。它们在联邦土地管理规划中具有重要的物种地位;因此,对麋鹿的生境评价和土地管理规划进行了大量的建模。这些和其他大型有蹄类动物栖息地模型在多大程度上考虑到营养资源的影响差异很大,可能是因为对营养重要性的认识不同,以及对如何测量和模拟营养的不确定性。我们的主要目标是:(1)进一步了解栖息地条件如何影响麋鹿夏秋季节的觅食动态和营养;2)建立了麋鹿营养资源评价与预测的生态框架,使麋鹿的营养需求能够与景观尺度规划、种群模型和生境评价模型相结合。我们评估了驼鹿对砍伐和商业间伐、森林演替和季节的觅食反应。我们还确定了植物群落满足哺乳期母麋鹿及其幼鹿营养需求的程度。我们的研究是在太平洋西北部的温带雨林的工业和公共林地进行的。本研究于2000-2002年6月下旬至11月在3个研究区(靠近加拿大边境的北卡斯卡德山脉(Nooksack)、华盛顿州奥林匹亚西南海岸山脉(Willapa Hills)和俄勒冈州斯普林菲尔德附近的中部卡斯卡德山脉(Springfield))对代表不同林龄和生态条件的植物群落中生境条件与麋鹿营养的关系进行了评估。在每个研究区98 ~ 143个大样地中,测定了不同植物种类的牧草丰度、不同植物生活型群的可消化能含量和森林盖度。在这些大样地的一个子集中(每个研究区约30只),我们将4只驯服的哺乳麋鹿和小牛饲养在电气化的围栏中(每年n = 15-25只成年麋鹿),并对活动预算、饮食组成、饲料选择和其他觅食行为进行采样;日粮消化能(DE;kcal/g)和蛋白质(DP;%)水平;以及这些营养素的摄取率。在其中的15个围栏中,我们延长了麋鹿的饲养时间(13-21天),以监测成年麋鹿的体脂变化和小牛的生长情况。我们建立了一个营养预测模型,用于预测饲粮DE和DP以及每分钟的摄取率,该模型反映了植被属性和生态地点的影响。中低海拔(≤1000 m)西部铁杉林系在采伐后的牧草总丰度在5- 10年林分的峰值为3000 - 4500 kg/ha,在20- 50年林分的峰值为100-300 kg/ha,在演替后期只有适度的增加。在海拔较高的森林(1000 ~ 1800 m),尽管牧草丰度的波峰和波谷发展较慢,但模式相似。在林分干扰后的前几个阶段,落叶灌木、草本植物和禾草类植物丰富,但在低海拔林带和高海拔林带,随着针叶林层在15-20年后关闭,这些植物迅速被耐阴常绿灌木和蕨类植物所取代。植物类群内的消化能随季节和演替的推进而降低,随海拔的升高而增加,以草本和落叶灌木最高,常绿灌木和耐阴蕨类最低。麋鹿日粮中DE水平与食用比例等于或大于可利用度(即可接受物种)的植物物种丰度(kg/ha)呈强渐近关系。饲料DE的显著下降发生在含有400 kg/ha至500 kg/ha可接受物种的林分,主要是因为麋鹿开始增加对可避免物种的消耗,而这些物种通常含有低水平的DE。在季节、研究区域和栖息地类型(潜在的自然植被类别)之间,渐进线模式总体上是一致的,尽管高海拔森林的渐进线平均比低海拔森林高10-12%。林分早期可接受物种的丰度平均是林分中后期的7 ~ 10倍,日粮DE水平也有相应的变化。在20 ~ 60年龄林分中,间伐对日粮DE影响不大。相比之下,饲粮DP水平与饲料组成和接受或避免的物种丰度无关,在低海拔和高海拔森林之间变化不大。日粮DP随冠层盖度的增加而增加,在夏末土壤饱和的阔叶林林分中较高,随季节变化而下降,在最干燥的森林群落中最低。 总体而言,土壤水分状况和季节是饲粮DP变化的主要原因。营养摄取率与植被条件的关系因研究区和生境类型而异。然而,在早期几个阶段,麋鹿的DE摄取率保持在封闭林冠的两倍左右。尽管在早期阶段饲粮中DP较低,但早期森林与封闭林冠森林之间DP的摄取率相似。稀薄和硬木河岸林分的蛋白质摄取率更高。在早期几个阶段,低海拔林区的饲粮DE一般满足2.7 kcal/g采食饲料的要求(维持夏季泌乳麋鹿体脂水平的必要条件),而高海拔林区则超过2.7 kcal/g。在闭冠林中,日粮DE平均低于需要量,低海拔林区显著低于需要量(2.25 ~ 2.5 kcal/g),高海拔林区中等低于需要量(2.4 ~ 2.65 kcal/g)。基于DE摄取率的缺乏证据更大,平均约为需要量的50%(28千卡/分钟;21,000千卡/天),满足早期几个阶段所需的80%。相比之下,膳食DP和DP摄取率通常接近或超过估计需要量(6.8% DP;380克/天),在我们取样的许多生境类型中,相对干燥、低海拔的森林中DP摄取率最可能不足。体脂动态和犊牛生长证实了我们的DE摄入数据所提示的营养缺乏。在所有试验中,成年麋鹿体脂的减脂率通常与它们摄入的膳食DE水平的预期一致,体脂变化率与可接受物种的丰度呈负相关。如果夏季营养充足,小牛的生长速度约为其能力的一半(1公斤/天)。犊牛日生长与母鼠日粮DE和蛋白质摄入水平呈正相关。麋鹿通过几种行为策略来弥补许多植物群落中有限的觅食选择。对于DE水平较高的植物,选择通常是强烈的,被选择的物种占饲料的比例是麋鹿避免的物种的近5倍,而被避免的物种的丰度是麋鹿的10倍。当可接受物种的丰度低于约400公斤/公顷时,麋鹿增加了对不可接受物种的摄入量。该策略延缓了每分钟饲料和消化能摄取率的下降,只要可接受物种的丰度保持在大约200 kg/ha以上,尽管可接受物种的日粮消化能水平在400 kg/ha至500 kg/ha时明显下降。驼鹿在觅食时更快地移动,以补偿总饲料丰度非常低的植物群落,随着咬质量的降低,咬伤率增加,在总饲料丰度低或饲粮DE水平相对较低的围栏中,夜间饲养时间增加,反刍时间增加,特别是随着膳食纤维水平的增加。因此,饲粮DE、DP和这些营养物质的摄取率对整体饲料质量和数量的变化具有显著影响。然而,这些策略不足以弥补低丰度的优质饲料通常存在于封闭的森林冠层。我们的营养模型包括非线性和多元回归方程,主要基于可接受物种的丰度(r2 = 0.49-0.62)来预测1)饲粮DE(摄入饲料的千卡/克);2)饲粮DP(采食饲料的百分比),主要基于可接受物种的丰度、林冠盖度和用于指示土壤湿度的立地特征(r2 = 0.60)。预测每分钟摄入率的附加方程包括相同的协变量,但解释的方差略低(DE摄入量:r2 = 0.43;DP摄入量:r2 = 0.45-0.54)。利用这些方程,我们创建了营养演替曲线,以说明每种栖息地类型和研究区域的日粮DE和DP摄入量在演替序列中的动态变化。这些剖面可以作为麋鹿营养资源空间明确地图的输入。由于它们是根据麋鹿觅食的营养数据开发的,因此它们应该有助于减轻通常用作营养资源指数的代理变量所产生的许多不确定性。我们的数据表明,俄勒冈州西部和华盛顿州的森林在夏季和初秋普遍缺乏哺乳麋鹿的营养资源。他们提供的证据表明,营养资源不足是造成秋季体脂低和太平洋西北地区许多麋鹿群怀孕率降低的主要原因。我们的数据还表明,栖息地的营养价值是高度可变的,取决于生态环境,干扰和演替。 因此,如何、是否以及在哪里管理森林麋鹿栖息地会极大地影响一个地区的营养适宜性。最后,我们的数据表明,在景观规划过程中整合营养评估是相当必要的,因为保持丰富和多产的麋鹿种群是太平洋西北地
{"title":"Nutritional ecology of elk during summer and autumn in the Pacific Northwest","authors":"John G. Cook,&nbsp;Rachel C. Cook,&nbsp;Ronald W. Davis,&nbsp;Larry L. Irwin","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1020","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Elk (<i>Cervus elaphus</i>) in the western United States are an economically and socially valuable wildlife species. They have featured species status for federal land management planning; hence, considerable modeling focused on habitat evaluation and land management planning has been undertaken for elk. The extent to which these and other habitat models for large ungulates account for influences of nutritional resources varies greatly, probably because of varying recognition of the importance of nutrition and uncertainty about how to measure and model nutrition. Our primary goals were to 1) develop greater understanding of how habitat conditions influence foraging dynamics and nutrition of elk in summer and autumn; and 2) illustrate an ecological framework for evaluating and predicting nutritional resources so that nutritional needs of elk can be integrated within landscape-scale plans, population models, and habitat evaluation models. We evaluated foraging responses of elk to clearcut logging and commercial thinning, forest succession, and season across ecological site potentials. We also identified the extent to which plant communities satisfied nutritional requirements of lactating female elk and their calves. Our study was conducted in the temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest on industrial and public timberlands.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We evaluated relations between habitat conditions and elk nutrition in plant communities representing a range in stand age and ecological conditions at 3 study areas, 1 near the Canadian border in the north Cascades Mountains (Nooksack), 1 in the Coast range southwest of Olympia, Washington (Willapa Hills), and the third in the central Cascades near Springfield, Oregon (Springfield), from late June to November, 2000–2002. In 98–143 macroplots per study area, we measured forage abundance by plant species, digestible energy content by plant life-form group, and forest overstory. In a subset of these macroplots (∼30 per study area), we held 4 tame lactating elk with calves in electrified pens (<i>n</i> = 15–25 adult elk per year), and sampled activity budgets, dietary composition, forage selection, and other measures of foraging behavior; dietary digestible energy (DE; kcal/g) and protein (DP; %) levels; and intake rates of these nutrients. In 15 of these pens, we held elk for extended periods (13–21 days) to monitor changes in body fat of adults and growth of calves. We developed equations to predict dietary DE and DP and per-minute intake rates of each in a nutrition prediction model that reflected vegetation attributes and ecological site influences.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Total abundance of forage in the western hemlock series after clearcut logging in low to moderate elevations (≤1,000 m) ranged from a peak of 3,000–4,500 kg/ha in 5- to 10-year-old stands to 100–300 kg/ha in 20- to 50-year-old stands with onl","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2016-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5748291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68
Demographic rates and population viability of black bears in Louisiana 路易斯安那州黑熊的人口比率和种群生存能力
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2016-06-15 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1018
Jared S. Laufenberg, Joseph D. Clark, Michael J. Hooker, Carrie L. Lowe, Kaitlin C. O'Connell-Goode, Jesse C. Troxler, Maria M. Davidson, Michael J. Chamberlain, Richard B. Chandler

The Louisiana black bear (Ursus americanus luteolus) was reduced to a few small, fragmented, and isolated subpopulations in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley by the mid-twentieth century resulting from loss and fragmentation of habitat. In 1992, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) granted the Louisiana black bear threatened status under the United States Endangered Species Act of 1973. Since that time, a recovery plan was developed, a reintroduced population was established, and habitat recovery has occurred. The Recovery Plan states that a minimum of 2 populations must be viable (i.e., persistence probabilities over 100 years >0.95), 1 in the Tensas River Basin and 1 in the Atchafalaya River Basin. Consequently, our objectives were to 1) estimate demographic rates of Louisiana black bear subpopulations, 2) develop data-driven stochastic population projection models, and 3) determine how different projection model assumptions affect population trajectories and predictions about long-term persistence. Our overall goal was to assess long-term persistence of the bear subpopulations in Louisiana, individually and as a whole. We collected data using varying combinations of non-invasive DNA sampling, live capture, winter den visits, and radio monitoring from 2002 to 2012 in the 4 areas currently supporting breeding subpopulations in Louisiana: Tensas River Basin (TRB), Upper Atchafalaya River Basin (UARB), Lower Atchafalaya River Basin (LARB), and a recently reintroduced population at the Three Rivers Complex (TRC). From 2002 to 2012, we radio monitored fates of 86 adult females within the TRB and 43 in the TRC. Mean estimates of annual adult survival for the TRB and TRC were 0.997 and 0.990, respectively, when unknown fates were assumed alive and 0.970 and 0.926 when unknown fates were assumed dead. From 2003 to 2013, we observed 130 cub litters from 74 females in the TRB, and 74 cub litters from 45 females in the TRC. During the same period, we observed 43 yearling litters for 33 females in the TRB and 21 yearling litters for 19 females in the TRC. The estimated number of cubs and number of yearlings produced per breeding adult female was 0.47 and 0.20, respectively, in the TRB and 0.32 and 0.18 in the TRC. On the basis of matrix projection models, asymptotic growth rates ranged from 1.053 to 1.078 for the TRB and from 1.005 to 1.062 for the TRC, depending on how we treated unresolved fates of adult females. Persistence probabilities estimated from stochastic population models based on telemetry data ranged from 0.997 to 0.998 for the TRC subpopulation depending on model assumptions and were >0.999 for the TRB regardless of model assumptions. We extracted DNA from hair collected at baited, barbed-wire enclosures in the TRB, UARB, and LARB to determine individual identities for capture-mark-recapture (CMR) analysis. We used those detection histori

路易斯安那黑熊(Ursus americanus luteolus)由于栖息地的丧失和破碎,到20世纪中叶,在密西西比冲积河谷下游减少到几个小的、分散的和孤立的亚种群。1992年,美国鱼类和野生动物管理局(USFWS)根据1973年的美国濒危物种法案,将路易斯安那黑熊列为受威胁物种。从那时起,制定了一项恢复计划,重新引入了种群,栖息地也得到了恢复。恢复计划指出,至少有两个种群必须是可行的(即,持续概率超过100年&gt;0.95),一个在Tensas河流域,一个在Atchafalaya河流域。因此,我们的目标是1)估计路易斯安那州黑熊亚种群的人口比率,2)开发数据驱动的随机种群预测模型,以及3)确定不同的预测模型假设如何影响种群轨迹和对长期持久性的预测。我们的总体目标是评估路易斯安那州熊亚群的长期持久性,无论是个体还是整体。从2002年到2012年,我们采用非侵入性DNA取样、现场捕获、冬季巢穴巡查和无线电监测等不同组合的方法收集了路易斯安那州目前支持繁殖亚种群的4个地区的数据:田纳西河流域(TRB)、上阿查法拉亚河流域(UARB)、下阿查法拉亚河流域(LARB),以及最近在三河复群(TRC)重新引入的种群。从2002年到2012年,我们无线电监测了TRB内86只成年雌性和TRC内43只成年雌性的命运。假设未知命运为活着时,TRB和TRC的年平均成人生存率分别为0.997和0.990;假设未知命运为死亡时,TRB和TRC的年平均成人生存率分别为0.970和0.926。从2003年到2013年,我们在藏区观察到74只母熊产下130窝幼崽,在藏区观察到45只母熊产下74窝幼崽。在同一时期,我们在TRB和TRC分别观察了33只母鼠和19只母鼠的43窝幼崽。在TRB和TRC中,每只繁殖成年母熊的幼崽和幼崽数量分别为0.47和0.20,而在TRC中分别为0.32和0.18。在矩阵投影模型的基础上,根据我们如何处理成年女性未解决的命运,TRB的渐近增长率在1.053至1.078之间,TRC的渐近增长率在1.05至1.062之间。基于遥测数据的随机种群模型估计的TRC亚种群的持续概率在0.997 ~ 0.998之间,与模型假设无关,TRB的持续概率为&gt;0.999。我们从TRB, UARB和LARB的诱饵,铁丝网围栏收集的头发中提取DNA,以确定捕获-标记-再捕获(CMR)分析的个体身份。我们使用这些检测历史来估计表观生存(φ)、人均招募(f)、丰度(N)、实现增长率(λ)和长期生存能力,基于贝叶斯分层建模方法,可以估计时间过程方差和参数不确定性。基于23,312份头发样本,2006-2012年期间TRB女性的年N值在133到164之间,这取决于年份和检测异质性的建模方式。λ的几何平均值为0.996 ~ 1.002。在UARB中,我们从2007年到2012年收集了11,643份头发样本,根据检测异质性模型,研究期间女性N的估计值在23到43之间。λ的几何平均值为1.038 ~ 1.059。根据2010-2012年收集的3,698份头发样本,LARB中女性的估计N在69 ~ 96之间,λ的年值在0.80 ~ 1.11之间,这也取决于年份和异质性模型。基于随机矩阵投影模型的TRC和TRB在所有情景下持续100年的概率为0.95。该模型使用遥测数据估算的生命速率。基于基于CMR分析的生命率估算的预测模型,TRB和UARB的持续概率分别在0.928 ~ 0.954和0.906 ~ 0.959之间,取决于模型假设。LARB的数据不足以进行生存能力评估。因此,在某些模型假设下,TRB和UARB的个体持久性概率不符合生存力的严格定义(即&gt;0.95)。然而,假设个体种群动态独立,熊在TRB或UARB中生存的联合概率为&gt;0.993;假设动态完全相关,熊在TRB或UARB中生存的联合概率为&gt;0.958。此外,根据最悲观的个体持久性估计,包括TRC将熊在TRB, UARB或TRC中的某个地方持续存在的联合概率提高到&gt;0.999。 因此,如果指定2个亚种群应该是可行的目的是确保路易斯安那黑熊在其历史范围内的某个地方持续存在,那么生存能力阈值就满足了。©2016野生动物协会。
{"title":"Demographic rates and population viability of black bears in Louisiana","authors":"Jared S. Laufenberg,&nbsp;Joseph D. Clark,&nbsp;Michael J. Hooker,&nbsp;Carrie L. Lowe,&nbsp;Kaitlin C. O'Connell-Goode,&nbsp;Jesse C. Troxler,&nbsp;Maria M. Davidson,&nbsp;Michael J. Chamberlain,&nbsp;Richard B. Chandler","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1018","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Louisiana black bear (<i>Ursus americanus luteolus</i>) was reduced to a few small, fragmented, and isolated subpopulations in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley by the mid-twentieth century resulting from loss and fragmentation of habitat. In 1992, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) granted the Louisiana black bear threatened status under the United States Endangered Species Act of 1973. Since that time, a recovery plan was developed, a reintroduced population was established, and habitat recovery has occurred. The Recovery Plan states that a minimum of 2 populations must be viable (i.e., persistence probabilities over 100 years &gt;0.95), 1 in the Tensas River Basin and 1 in the Atchafalaya River Basin. Consequently, our objectives were to 1) estimate demographic rates of Louisiana black bear subpopulations, 2) develop data-driven stochastic population projection models, and 3) determine how different projection model assumptions affect population trajectories and predictions about long-term persistence. Our overall goal was to assess long-term persistence of the bear subpopulations in Louisiana, individually and as a whole. We collected data using varying combinations of non-invasive DNA sampling, live capture, winter den visits, and radio monitoring from 2002 to 2012 in the 4 areas currently supporting breeding subpopulations in Louisiana: Tensas River Basin (TRB), Upper Atchafalaya River Basin (UARB), Lower Atchafalaya River Basin (LARB), and a recently reintroduced population at the Three Rivers Complex (TRC). From 2002 to 2012, we radio monitored fates of 86 adult females within the TRB and 43 in the TRC. Mean estimates of annual adult survival for the TRB and TRC were 0.997 and 0.990, respectively, when unknown fates were assumed alive and 0.970 and 0.926 when unknown fates were assumed dead. From 2003 to 2013, we observed 130 cub litters from 74 females in the TRB, and 74 cub litters from 45 females in the TRC. During the same period, we observed 43 yearling litters for 33 females in the TRB and 21 yearling litters for 19 females in the TRC. The estimated number of cubs and number of yearlings produced per breeding adult female was 0.47 and 0.20, respectively, in the TRB and 0.32 and 0.18 in the TRC. On the basis of matrix projection models, asymptotic growth rates ranged from 1.053 to 1.078 for the TRB and from 1.005 to 1.062 for the TRC, depending on how we treated unresolved fates of adult females. Persistence probabilities estimated from stochastic population models based on telemetry data ranged from 0.997 to 0.998 for the TRC subpopulation depending on model assumptions and were &gt;0.999 for the TRB regardless of model assumptions. We extracted DNA from hair collected at baited, barbed-wire enclosures in the TRB, UARB, and LARB to determine individual identities for capture-mark-recapture (CMR) analysis. We used those detection histori","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2016-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6249395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73
Phylogeography of the bobwhite (Colinus) quails 山齿鹑(Colinus)的系统地理学
IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2015-12-24 DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1017
Damon Williford, Randy W. Deyoung, Rodney L. Honeycutt, Leonard A. Brennan, Fidel Hernández

The bobwhites (Colinus) consist of 3 grassland-associated, allopatric species of New World quails (family Odontophoridae): the northern bobwhite (C. virginianus), distributed from the eastern United States to Guatemala; the black-throated bobwhite (C. nigrogularis), which occurs in scattered localities in the Yucatán Peninsula, Nicaragua, and Honduras; and the crested bobwhite (C. cristatus), whose range stretches from Guatemala to northern Brazil. We used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from both the control region and the ND2 gene to study the phylogenetic relationships and phylogeography of the 3 bobwhite species. We developed ecological niche models to evaluate conclusions inferred from genetic data. Colinus was composed of 2 deeply divergent lineages, 1 represented by the crested bobwhite and the other by northern and black-throated bobwhites, both of which were genetically distinct from each other. Although the northern bobwhite had high haplotype diversity, this species exhibited evidence of past demographic and geographic expansion, no phylogeographic structure, and no congruence between genetic variation and subspecies taxonomy. Ecological niche modeling was congruent with a recent range expansion for the northern bobwhite from Late Pleistocene refugia in México and the southern United States. The black-throated bobwhites from the Yucatán Peninsula were distinct from those in Nicaragua, and as a whole this species displayed little evidence of recent expansion. Ecological niche modeling suggested that the current, fragmented distribution of the black-throated bobwhite has existed for the past 130,000 years. Although the crested bobwhite displayed little evidence of population expansion, the mtDNA data revealed 3–4 geographically and genetically distinct lineages. Results of niche modeling suggest that the crested bobwhite had a much wider distribution in Central and South America during the Last Glacial Maximum. Given the sensitivity of all 3 bobwhite species to climatic cycles, managers should consider impacts of climate change in addition to the loss of habitat when crafting conservation plans. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.

山齿鹑(Colinus)由3种与草原相关的新大陆鹌鹑(山齿鹑科)组成:北部山齿鹑(C. virginianus),分布于美国东部至危地马拉;黑喉山齿鹑(C. nigrogularis),分布在Yucatán半岛、尼加拉瓜和洪都拉斯的一些地方;以及冠状山齿鹑(C. cristatus),其活动范围从危地马拉延伸到巴西北部。利用对照区和ND2基因的线粒体DNA (mtDNA)序列对3种山齿鹑的系统发育关系和系统地理进行了研究。我们开发了生态位模型来评估从遗传数据推断出的结论。Colinus由两个非常不同的谱系组成,一个以冠状山齿鹑为代表,另一个以北方和黑喉山齿鹑为代表,两者在遗传上彼此不同。尽管北方山齿鹑具有较高的单倍型多样性,但该物种表现出过去人口统计学和地理扩张的证据,没有系统地理结构,遗传变异与亚种分类之间不一致。生态位模型与最近在墨西哥和美国南部晚更新世避难所北部山齿鹑的活动范围扩展相一致。来自Yucatán半岛的黑喉山齿鹑与尼加拉瓜的不同,作为一个整体,这个物种几乎没有显示出最近扩张的迹象。生态位模型表明,黑喉山齿鹑目前的分散分布已经存在了13万年。虽然冠状山齿鹑没有显示出种群扩张的证据,但mtDNA数据显示了3-4个地理和遗传上不同的谱系。生态位模拟结果表明,在末次盛冰期,冠状山齿鹑在中南美洲的分布范围要广得多。考虑到这三种山齿鹑对气候周期的敏感性,管理者在制定保护计划时除了考虑栖息地的丧失外,还应该考虑气候变化的影响。©2015野生动物协会。
{"title":"Phylogeography of the bobwhite (Colinus) quails","authors":"Damon Williford,&nbsp;Randy W. Deyoung,&nbsp;Rodney L. Honeycutt,&nbsp;Leonard A. Brennan,&nbsp;Fidel Hernández","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1017","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The bobwhites (<i>Colinus</i>) consist of 3 grassland-associated, allopatric species of New World quails (family Odontophoridae): the northern bobwhite (<i>C. virginianus</i>), distributed from the eastern United States to Guatemala; the black-throated bobwhite (<i>C. nigrogularis</i>), which occurs in scattered localities in the Yucatán Peninsula, Nicaragua, and Honduras; and the crested bobwhite (<i>C. cristatus</i>), whose range stretches from Guatemala to northern Brazil. We used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from both the control region and the ND2 gene to study the phylogenetic relationships and phylogeography of the 3 bobwhite species. We developed ecological niche models to evaluate conclusions inferred from genetic data. <i>Colinus</i> was composed of 2 deeply divergent lineages, 1 represented by the crested bobwhite and the other by northern and black-throated bobwhites, both of which were genetically distinct from each other. Although the northern bobwhite had high haplotype diversity, this species exhibited evidence of past demographic and geographic expansion, no phylogeographic structure, and no congruence between genetic variation and subspecies taxonomy. Ecological niche modeling was congruent with a recent range expansion for the northern bobwhite from Late Pleistocene refugia in México and the southern United States. The black-throated bobwhites from the Yucatán Peninsula were distinct from those in Nicaragua, and as a whole this species displayed little evidence of recent expansion. Ecological niche modeling suggested that the current, fragmented distribution of the black-throated bobwhite has existed for the past 130,000 years. Although the crested bobwhite displayed little evidence of population expansion, the mtDNA data revealed 3–4 geographically and genetically distinct lineages. Results of niche modeling suggest that the crested bobwhite had a much wider distribution in Central and South America during the Last Glacial Maximum. Given the sensitivity of all 3 bobwhite species to climatic cycles, managers should consider impacts of climate change in addition to the loss of habitat when crafting conservation plans. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2015-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5694426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
期刊
Wildlife Monographs
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1