首页 > 最新文献

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
National Survey on Infection Prevention and Control in United States Emergency Departments. 美国急诊科感染预防和控制全国调查。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.46582
Laya Dasari, Molly L Paras, Samantha L Pellicane, Eileen F Searle, Amy Courtney, Julio Ma Shum, Krislyn M Boggs, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Carlos A Camargo, Jeremiah D Schuur, Erica S Shenoy, Paul D Biddinger
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the emergency care setting, implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices can be challenging due to numerous factors including emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding of patients, high staff-turnover rates, and acuity of patient needs. Understanding how the unique nature of the ED environment impacts IPC implementation is essential to reducing healthcare-associated infections and to improving patient safety. In this study we aimed to assess ED leaders' perceptions of IPC practices to identify areas for potential intervention and inform targeted process improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January-July 2023, ED leaders across the United States were queried about their IPC practices using the National Emergency Department Inventories (NEDI)-USA survey, which is administered annually to all EDs in the US. An expanded survey was administered in a subset of EDs to assess healthcare personnel training for IPC, reported adherence to recommended practices and policies related to disinfection of reusable medical equipment and environment, use of personal protective equipment, hand hygiene practices, patient care space cleaning and disinfection, use of transmission-based precautions signage, risk perceptions of how healthcare personnel practice contributes to healthcare-associated infections and barriers to appropriate room cleaning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 289 facilities surveyed, 159 (55%) responded, and among responding EDs, 67 (42%) reported seeing ≥ 40,000 patients in the prior year. Regarding healthcare personnel training, 84% (131/156) of ED leaders reported that ≥80% of their ED healthcare personnel were correctly trained in IPC procedures according to their hospital's policies. Perception of healthcare personnel compliance with IPC practices, however, was lower. Although 75% (118/157) of EDs reported > 80% compliance with correct N95 respirator use, compliance with transmission-based precaution signage was identified as a significant gap, with 30% (47/159) of EDs reporting that they never, rarely, or only sometimes posted signs for patients who required them. Further, 69% (61/89) of EDs reported that they never, rarely, or only sometimes posted transmission-based precaution signs for patients in hallways or overflow treatment spaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This national survey found that ED leaders perceive that their healthcare personnel have a high level of knowledge of IPC policies and compliance with some, but not all, IPC policies in the ED. The overall high perceptions of compliance stand in contrast to prior published observations of poor IPC practice in ED settings, suggesting complex relationships between perception and practice that may impact patient safety outcomes. These findings can guide future targeted interventions to improve IPC compliance, reduce healthcare-associated infections, and improve patient safety in
导言:在急诊护理环境中,感染预防和控制(IPC)实践的实施可能具有挑战性,原因包括急诊科(ED)拥挤和患者登机,人员流动率高,以及患者需求的紧迫性。了解急诊科环境的独特性如何影响IPC的实施,对于减少医疗保健相关感染和提高患者安全至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估ED领导对IPC实践的看法,以确定潜在干预的领域,并告知有针对性的流程改进计划。方法:在2023年1月至7月期间,使用美国国家急诊科清单(NEDI)调查向美国各地的急诊科领导询问他们的IPC实践,该调查每年对美国所有急诊科进行管理。在部分急诊室开展了一项扩大调查,以评估卫生保健人员在感染预防和预防方面的培训,报告遵守与可重复使用医疗设备和环境消毒、使用个人防护装备、手部卫生习惯、患者护理空间清洁和消毒、使用基于传播的预防措施标志有关的建议做法和政策。对卫生保健人员的做法如何导致卫生保健相关感染和妨碍适当的房间清洁的风险认知。结果:在接受调查的289家机构中,159家(55%)做出了回应,在回应的急诊室中,67家(42%)报告去年接待了超过40,000名患者。在医护人员培训方面,84%(131/156)的急诊科领导报告称,≥80%的急诊科医护人员根据医院政策接受了IPC程序的正确培训。然而,卫生保健人员遵守IPC做法的看法较低。尽管75%(118/157)的急诊科报告说正确使用了N95呼吸器,但对基于传播的预防标志的依从性被认为是一个重大差距,30%(47/159)的急诊科报告说他们从未、很少或只是有时为需要这些标志的患者张贴标志。此外,69%(61/89)的急诊室报告说,他们从未、很少或只是有时在走廊或溢出的治疗空间为患者张贴基于传播的预防标志。结论:这项全国调查发现,急诊科领导认为他们的医护人员对IPC政策有很高的了解,并遵守了急诊科的一些(但不是全部)IPC政策。总体上,对合规性的高认知与之前发表的急诊科IPC实践较差的观察结果形成了对比,这表明认知和实践之间的复杂关系可能会影响患者的安全结果。这些发现可以指导未来有针对性的干预措施,以改善IPC合规性,减少医疗保健相关感染,并改善急诊环境中的患者安全。
{"title":"National Survey on Infection Prevention and Control in United States Emergency Departments.","authors":"Laya Dasari, Molly L Paras, Samantha L Pellicane, Eileen F Searle, Amy Courtney, Julio Ma Shum, Krislyn M Boggs, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Carlos A Camargo, Jeremiah D Schuur, Erica S Shenoy, Paul D Biddinger","doi":"10.5811/westjem.46582","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.46582","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;In the emergency care setting, implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices can be challenging due to numerous factors including emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding of patients, high staff-turnover rates, and acuity of patient needs. Understanding how the unique nature of the ED environment impacts IPC implementation is essential to reducing healthcare-associated infections and to improving patient safety. In this study we aimed to assess ED leaders' perceptions of IPC practices to identify areas for potential intervention and inform targeted process improvement initiatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Between January-July 2023, ED leaders across the United States were queried about their IPC practices using the National Emergency Department Inventories (NEDI)-USA survey, which is administered annually to all EDs in the US. An expanded survey was administered in a subset of EDs to assess healthcare personnel training for IPC, reported adherence to recommended practices and policies related to disinfection of reusable medical equipment and environment, use of personal protective equipment, hand hygiene practices, patient care space cleaning and disinfection, use of transmission-based precautions signage, risk perceptions of how healthcare personnel practice contributes to healthcare-associated infections and barriers to appropriate room cleaning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of the 289 facilities surveyed, 159 (55%) responded, and among responding EDs, 67 (42%) reported seeing ≥ 40,000 patients in the prior year. Regarding healthcare personnel training, 84% (131/156) of ED leaders reported that ≥80% of their ED healthcare personnel were correctly trained in IPC procedures according to their hospital's policies. Perception of healthcare personnel compliance with IPC practices, however, was lower. Although 75% (118/157) of EDs reported &gt; 80% compliance with correct N95 respirator use, compliance with transmission-based precaution signage was identified as a significant gap, with 30% (47/159) of EDs reporting that they never, rarely, or only sometimes posted signs for patients who required them. Further, 69% (61/89) of EDs reported that they never, rarely, or only sometimes posted transmission-based precaution signs for patients in hallways or overflow treatment spaces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;This national survey found that ED leaders perceive that their healthcare personnel have a high level of knowledge of IPC policies and compliance with some, but not all, IPC policies in the ED. The overall high perceptions of compliance stand in contrast to prior published observations of poor IPC practice in ED settings, suggesting complex relationships between perception and practice that may impact patient safety outcomes. These findings can guide future targeted interventions to improve IPC compliance, reduce healthcare-associated infections, and improve patient safety in ","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1781-1789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Predictive Factors and Nomogram for 30-Day Mortality in Heatstroke Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study". 中暑患者30天死亡率的预测因素和Nomogram:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.48882
Jeffrey R Stowell, Geoff Comp, Paul Pugsley, Megan McElhinny, Murtaza Akhter
{"title":"\"Predictive Factors and Nomogram for 30-Day Mortality in Heatstroke Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study\".","authors":"Jeffrey R Stowell, Geoff Comp, Paul Pugsley, Megan McElhinny, Murtaza Akhter","doi":"10.5811/westjem.48882","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.48882","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1804-1805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698161/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A 30-year History of the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation. 急诊医学标准化评估信的30年历史
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.47110
Jenna S Hegarty, Cullen B Hegarty, Jeffrey N Love, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Sharon Bord, Michael C Bond, Samuel M Keim, Kevin Hamilton, Eric F Shappell

Thirty years ago, education leaders in emergency medicine (EM) developed a standardized letter of recommendation to address limitations of narrative letters of recommendation in the residency selection process. Since then, multiple iterations and improvements with specialty-wide adoption have led to this letter being cited as one of the most essential pieces of a residency application. Based on the experience and success in EM, many other specialties have also now adopted standardized letters of their own. In this paper, we detail the 30-year history of the EM standardized letter including form changes and technological innovations, research and validity evidence, and discussion of research and administrative priorities for the future.

30年前,急诊医学(EM)的教育领导者开发了一种标准化的推荐信,以解决在住院医师选择过程中叙述性推荐信的局限性。从那时起,随着专业范围内的采用,多次迭代和改进使得这封信被引用为住院医师申请中最重要的部分之一。基于EM的经验和成功,许多其他专业现在也采用了自己的标准化字母。在本文中,我们详细介绍了EM标准化信函的30年历史,包括形式变化和技术创新,研究和有效性证据,以及对未来研究和管理优先事项的讨论。
{"title":"A 30-year History of the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.","authors":"Jenna S Hegarty, Cullen B Hegarty, Jeffrey N Love, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Sharon Bord, Michael C Bond, Samuel M Keim, Kevin Hamilton, Eric F Shappell","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47110","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty years ago, education leaders in emergency medicine (EM) developed a standardized letter of recommendation to address limitations of narrative letters of recommendation in the residency selection process. Since then, multiple iterations and improvements with specialty-wide adoption have led to this letter being cited as one of the most essential pieces of a residency application. Based on the experience and success in EM, many other specialties have also now adopted standardized letters of their own. In this paper, we detail the 30-year history of the EM standardized letter including form changes and technological innovations, research and validity evidence, and discussion of research and administrative priorities for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1544-1548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Grouping of Emergency Department-based Cardiac Arrest Patients According to Clinical Features to Assess Patient Outcomes. 根据临床特征对急诊科心脏骤停患者进行分组以评估患者预后。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.46556
Joshua Leow, Po-Chun Shih, Jun-Wan Gao, Chih-Hung Wang, Tsung-Chien Lu, Chien-Hua Huang, Chu-Lin Tsai

Introduction: While research has begun to understand emergency department-based cardiac arrest (EDCA), consensus on what exactly constitutes EDCA remains unknown. In this study we aimed to explore the grouping of EDCA by using an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm and to investigate how these underlying clusters related to patient outcomes.

Methods: We retrieved electronic health record data from an ED in a tertiary medical center. The EDCAs were identified via the cardiopulmonary resuscitation log. We used k-means cluster analysis to group EDCAs and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) for visualization. Primary outcomes were ED mortality and ED length of stay (LOS). The analyses were repeated using an independent ED data set, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Emergency Department (MIMIC-IV-ED) dataset.

Results: From 2019 to 2022, there were 366 EDCA events. Cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters (Cluster 1 or immediate risk, n=54 [15%]; Cluster 2 or early risk, n=274 [75%]; Cluster 3 or late risk, n=38 [10%]). Cluster 1 patients had the shortest median time to EDCA (< 1 hour), followed by Cluster 2 (3 hours) and Cluster 3 (81 hours). Near cardiac arrest at triage was the most common cause of EDCA in Cluster 1, while respiratory illnesses and sepsis were more common in Cluster 3. The causes of EDCA in Cluster 2 were diverse, with predominantly cardiovascular and neurologic emergencies. The t-SNE revealed farther distances from Cluster 1 to the other two clusters, suggesting its most critical nature. Cluster 3 had the highest mortality (58%), followed by Clusters 1 (48%) and 2 (35%) (P = .01). Cluster 1 had the shortest median LOS (median, 4 hours), while Cluster 3 had the longest LOS (81 hours) (P < .001). In the independent data set, Cluster 1 remained, but Clusters 2 and 3 appeared to merge due to a shorter ED LOS overall.

Conclusion: We identified three novel clusters (immediate, early, and late risk) with distinct patterns in clinical presentation, putative causes of ED-based cardiac arrest, and ED outcomes. Understanding these clinical phenotypes may help develop cluster-specific interventions to prevent EDCA or intervene most appropriately. Cluster 1 patients may benefit from resuscitation efforts, and Clusters 2 or 3 patients can benefit from timely interventions for cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic emergencies. In addition, for patients with prolonged ED boarding, periodic monitoring with an early warning system may prevent a cardiac arrest event.

导读:虽然研究已经开始了解急诊科心脏骤停(EDCA),但对EDCA的确切构成仍未达成共识。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过使用无监督机器学习算法来探索EDCA的分组,并调查这些潜在的聚类与患者预后的关系。方法:我们从一家三级医疗中心的急诊科检索电子健康记录数据。通过心肺复苏记录确定edca。我们使用k-means聚类分析对edca进行分组,并使用t分布随机邻居嵌入(t-SNE)进行可视化。主要结局是急症死亡率和急症住院时间(LOS)。使用独立的急诊科数据集(重症急诊科医学信息集市(MIMIC-IV-ED)数据集)重复分析。结果:2019 - 2022年共发生EDCA事件366起。聚类分析确定了三个不同的聚类(聚类1或立即风险,n=54[15%];聚类2或早期风险,n=274[75%];聚类3或晚期风险,n=38[10%])。第1组患者发生EDCA的中位时间最短(< 1小时),其次是第2组(3小时)和第3组(81小时)。分诊时心脏骤停是第1类中EDCA最常见的原因,而呼吸系统疾病和败血症在第3类中更为常见。第二组EDCA的病因多种多样,主要是心血管和神经系统急症。t-SNE显示从星系团1到其他两个星系团的距离更远,这表明它最关键的性质。聚类3死亡率最高(58%),其次是聚类1(48%)和聚类2 (35%)(P = 0.01)。集群1的LOS中位数最短(中位数为4小时),而集群3的LOS中位数最长(81小时)(P < 0.001)。在独立的数据集中,集群1仍然存在,但集群2和集群3由于总体ED LOS较短而合并。结论:我们确定了三种新的聚类(即时、早期和晚期风险),它们在临床表现、基于ED的假定心脏骤停原因和ED结局方面具有不同的模式。了解这些临床表型可能有助于开发集群特异性干预措施来预防EDCA或进行最适当的干预。第一类患者可能受益于复苏努力,第二类或第三类患者可能受益于心脏、呼吸和神经紧急情况的及时干预。此外,对于长时间ED入住的患者,使用早期预警系统进行定期监测可能会预防心脏骤停事件。
{"title":"Grouping of Emergency Department-based Cardiac Arrest Patients According to Clinical Features to Assess Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Joshua Leow, Po-Chun Shih, Jun-Wan Gao, Chih-Hung Wang, Tsung-Chien Lu, Chien-Hua Huang, Chu-Lin Tsai","doi":"10.5811/westjem.46556","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.46556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While research has begun to understand emergency department-based cardiac arrest (EDCA), consensus on what exactly constitutes EDCA remains unknown. In this study we aimed to explore the grouping of EDCA by using an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm and to investigate how these underlying clusters related to patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved electronic health record data from an ED in a tertiary medical center. The EDCAs were identified via the cardiopulmonary resuscitation log. We used k-means cluster analysis to group EDCAs and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) for visualization. Primary outcomes were ED mortality and ED length of stay (LOS). The analyses were repeated using an independent ED data set, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Emergency Department (MIMIC-IV-ED) dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2019 to 2022, there were 366 EDCA events. Cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters (Cluster 1 or immediate risk, n=54 [15%]; Cluster 2 or early risk, n=274 [75%]; Cluster 3 or late risk, n=38 [10%]). Cluster 1 patients had the shortest median time to EDCA (< 1 hour), followed by Cluster 2 (3 hours) and Cluster 3 (81 hours). Near cardiac arrest at triage was the most common cause of EDCA in Cluster 1, while respiratory illnesses and sepsis were more common in Cluster 3. The causes of EDCA in Cluster 2 were diverse, with predominantly cardiovascular and neurologic emergencies. The t-SNE revealed farther distances from Cluster 1 to the other two clusters, suggesting its most critical nature. Cluster 3 had the highest mortality (58%), followed by Clusters 1 (48%) and 2 (35%) (P = .01). Cluster 1 had the shortest median LOS (median, 4 hours), while Cluster 3 had the longest LOS (81 hours) (P < .001). In the independent data set, Cluster 1 remained, but Clusters 2 and 3 appeared to merge due to a shorter ED LOS overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified three novel clusters (immediate, early, and late risk) with distinct patterns in clinical presentation, putative causes of ED-based cardiac arrest, and ED outcomes. Understanding these clinical phenotypes may help develop cluster-specific interventions to prevent EDCA or intervene most appropriately. Cluster 1 patients may benefit from resuscitation efforts, and Clusters 2 or 3 patients can benefit from timely interventions for cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic emergencies. In addition, for patients with prolonged ED boarding, periodic monitoring with an early warning system may prevent a cardiac arrest event.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1656-1666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698154/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns in Duration of Emergency Department Boarding and Variation by Sociodemographic Factors. 急诊科住院时间模式及社会人口因素的变化。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.42477
Christiana K Prucnal, Melissa A Meeker, Martin Copenhaver, Paul S Jansson, Rebecca E Cash, William Hillmann, Steven Knuesel, Wendy Macias-Konstantopoulos, Jonathan D Sonis

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) boarding negatively affects patient outcomes, increasing length of stay, hallway care, and mortality. Prior research found disparities in capacity metrics like hallway care based on patient race and ethnicity. However, whether boarding differs by demographics is not well characterized. We examined boarding variation by sociodemographic factors in a hospital with a standardized bed-prioritization process. We hypothesized that a structured inpatient assignment method may be associated with reduced boarding inequity.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included adult patients boarding in the ED after admission to the non-intensive care inpatient medicine service between February 2020-February 2023 at an urban, academic, tertiary-care hospital with > 110,000 annual ED visits. Primary outcome was time from admission order to inpatient bed transport. Patient demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, insurance, and housing status), visit characteristics (Emergency Severity Index, time, and day), and bed request features (telemetry, sitter need, and isolation precaution) were obtained via the medical record. We assessed for bivariate relationships between boarding time and demographics with descriptive statistics and analysis of variance using adjusted and unadjusted regression analyses with generalized estimating equations to account for patient-level correlation.

Results: In total, 22,291 encounters were included. Average age was 64 (SD ±19) years, and 47% were female. Approximately 12% identified as Hispanic, 70% as non-Hispanic White, and 10% as non-Hispanic Black. Most (97%) boarded ≥ 120 minutes. In adjusted analyses, patients with Medicaid waited an additional 85 minutes (95% CI 49-121), and patients with Medicare waited an additional 67 minutes (95% CI 32-103) compared to those with commercial coverage (both P < .001, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black patients boarded 14 minutes longer (95% CI 22-51), and non-English primary language speakers boarded 15 minutes longer (95% CI 17-47) than non-Hispanic White patients and English primary language speakers, respectively, although these two findings were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Among adult patients admitted to the inpatient medicine service, non-commercial insurance such as Medicaid and Medicare was significantly associated with longer ED boarding, whereas race/ethnicity and primary language were not. Further study should determine whether these findings are replicated elsewhere, how this impacts patients, and whether targeted intervention can reduce inequities.

简介:急诊科(ED)登机会对患者的预后产生负面影响,增加住院时间、走廊护理和死亡率。先前的研究发现,根据病人的种族和民族,走廊护理等能力指标存在差异。然而,登机是否因人口统计而不同并没有很好的特征。我们通过社会人口学因素考察了在一个标准化床位优先排序过程的医院中寄宿的变化。我们假设结构化的住院分配方法可能与减少住院不公平有关。方法:这项单中心、回顾性、队列研究纳入了2020年2月至2023年2月期间在一家城市三级专科医院非重症监护住院医学服务部门住院的成年患者,该医院每年急诊科就诊人数为1011万人次。主要观察指标为从入院到转床的时间。通过病历获得患者人口统计数据(年龄、性别、种族/民族、语言、保险和住房状况)、就诊特征(紧急程度指数、时间和日期)和床位要求特征(遥测、保姆需求和隔离预防)。我们通过描述性统计评估登机时间和人口统计学之间的双变量关系,并使用调整和未调整的回归分析进行方差分析,并使用广义估计方程来解释患者水平的相关性。结果:共纳入22291次就诊。平均年龄64 (SD±19)岁,女性占47%。大约12%为西班牙裔,70%为非西班牙裔白人,10%为非西班牙裔黑人。大多数(97%)上车时间≥120分钟。在调整分析中,与商业保险患者相比,医疗补助患者多等待85分钟(95% CI 49-121),医疗保险患者多等待67分钟(95% CI 32-103) (P均< 0.001)。非西班牙裔黑人患者比非西班牙裔白人患者和以英语为主要语言的患者登机时间分别长14分钟(95% CI 22-51)和15分钟(95% CI 17-47),尽管这两项发现没有统计学意义。结论:在住院医疗服务的成年患者中,医疗补助和医疗保险等非商业保险与急诊科住院时间显著相关,而种族/民族和主要语言无关。进一步的研究应该确定这些发现是否在其他地方被复制,这如何影响患者,以及有针对性的干预是否可以减少不平等。
{"title":"Patterns in Duration of Emergency Department Boarding and Variation by Sociodemographic Factors.","authors":"Christiana K Prucnal, Melissa A Meeker, Martin Copenhaver, Paul S Jansson, Rebecca E Cash, William Hillmann, Steven Knuesel, Wendy Macias-Konstantopoulos, Jonathan D Sonis","doi":"10.5811/westjem.42477","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.42477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department (ED) boarding negatively affects patient outcomes, increasing length of stay, hallway care, and mortality. Prior research found disparities in capacity metrics like hallway care based on patient race and ethnicity. However, whether boarding differs by demographics is not well characterized. We examined boarding variation by sociodemographic factors in a hospital with a standardized bed-prioritization process. We hypothesized that a structured inpatient assignment method may be associated with reduced boarding inequity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included adult patients boarding in the ED after admission to the non-intensive care inpatient medicine service between February 2020-February 2023 at an urban, academic, tertiary-care hospital with > 110,000 annual ED visits. Primary outcome was time from admission order to inpatient bed transport. Patient demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, insurance, and housing status), visit characteristics (Emergency Severity Index, time, and day), and bed request features (telemetry, sitter need, and isolation precaution) were obtained via the medical record. We assessed for bivariate relationships between boarding time and demographics with descriptive statistics and analysis of variance using adjusted and unadjusted regression analyses with generalized estimating equations to account for patient-level correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22,291 encounters were included. Average age was 64 (SD ±19) years, and 47% were female. Approximately 12% identified as Hispanic, 70% as non-Hispanic White, and 10% as non-Hispanic Black. Most (97%) boarded ≥ 120 minutes. In adjusted analyses, patients with Medicaid waited an additional 85 minutes (95% CI 49-121), and patients with Medicare waited an additional 67 minutes (95% CI 32-103) compared to those with commercial coverage (both P < .001, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black patients boarded 14 minutes longer (95% CI 22-51), and non-English primary language speakers boarded 15 minutes longer (95% CI 17-47) than non-Hispanic White patients and English primary language speakers, respectively, although these two findings were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among adult patients admitted to the inpatient medicine service, non-commercial insurance such as Medicaid and Medicare was significantly associated with longer ED boarding, whereas race/ethnicity and primary language were not. Further study should determine whether these findings are replicated elsewhere, how this impacts patients, and whether targeted intervention can reduce inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1640-1647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intersectional Analysis of Suicide-related Emergency Department Visits in Youth in California, 2018-2021. 2018-2021年加州青少年自杀相关急诊就诊的交叉分析
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.47097
Laura M Prichett, Annie Na, Hanae Fujii-Rios, Emily E Haroz

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and related anti-Asian political rhetoric had a detrimental impact on the mental health of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) youth in the United States. Our objective was to quantify trends in suicide-related emergency department (ED) encounters among AAPI youth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, using an intersectional lens of race and sex and to contextualize these trends on a timeline of political and social events (such as anti-Asian hate crimes) occurring during the same period in California.

Methods: Using data from the California State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) from 2018-2021, we evaluated changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED encounters by age, race, and sex subgroups by comparing mean percentage change in proportions before and during the pandemic among patients 8-21 years of age. We evaluated changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED encounters by age, race, and sex subgroups by comparing mean percentage changes as they related to events around the pandemic and spikes in anti-Asian hate crimes. To compare relative disparities during the periods, we used stratified adjusted mixed multilevel logistic regression, with White males as the reference group.

Results: The overall increase in suicide-related ED visits for all youth during this period was 49.5% (95% CI 46.7-52.2%), representing 2,637 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018. The graphical observational analysis of changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED visits showed some temporal correlation between spikes in rates among AAPI and American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) females and specific events, such as anti-Asian hate crimes and school closings. The largest percentage increase was seen among females of all races, and in particular, AI/AN females (+58.1%, representing 471 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018) and AAPI females (+57.5%, representing 1,545 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018). During the pandemic, the adjusted odds of a suicide-related ED visit among AAPI females 13-17 years of age compared to White males was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.91-2.13). A total of 131 in-ED deaths occurred during the study period, with no significant year-to-year variation in the number of deaths.

Conclusion: Suicide-related ED visits increased for all youth during COVID-19, with the sharpest rise among AAPI and AI/AN females. Asian American and Pacific Islander females 8-12 and 13-17 years of age showed especially large increases. While causality cannot be inferred, patterns aligned with pandemic disruptions and anti-Asian hate crimes. Findings highlight the value of intersectional analysis to identify disproportionately impacted subgroups and inform future, culturally responsive suicide prevention efforts.

新冠肺炎大流行及其相关的反亚洲政治言论对美国亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民(AAPI)青年的心理健康产生了不利影响。我们的目标是利用种族和性别的交叉视角,量化在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,亚太裔青年中与自杀相关的急诊科(ED)遭遇的趋势,并将这些趋势与加州同一时期发生的政治和社会事件(如反亚裔仇恨犯罪)的时间轴联系起来。方法:使用来自加利福尼亚州急诊科数据库(SEDD) 2018-2021年的数据,通过比较8-21岁患者在大流行前和期间的平均百分比变化,我们评估了年龄、种族和性别亚组中与自杀相关的ED遭遇的季度比例变化。我们通过比较与大流行事件和反亚洲仇恨犯罪高峰相关的平均百分比变化,评估了年龄、种族和性别亚组中与自杀相关的ED遭遇的季度比例变化。为了比较不同时期的相对差异,我们采用分层调整混合多水平逻辑回归,以白人男性为参照组。结果:在此期间,所有青少年与自杀相关的急诊就诊总体增加了49.5% (95% CI 46.7-52.2%),与2018年相比,2021年与自杀相关的急诊就诊增加了2637次。对与自杀有关的ED就诊季度比例变化的图形观察分析显示,在亚太裔、美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)女性中,自杀率的飙升与特定事件(如反亚裔仇恨犯罪和学校关闭)之间存在一定的时间相关性。增幅最大的是所有种族的女性,尤其是AI/AN女性(+58.1%,2021年与自杀相关的急诊科就诊次数比2018年增加471次)和AAPI女性(+57.5%,2021年与自杀相关的急诊科就诊次数比2018年增加1545次)。在大流行期间,与白人男性相比,13-17岁的AAPI女性与自杀相关的ED就诊的调整几率为2.01 (95% CI, 1.91-2.13)。研究期间共发生131例急诊科死亡,死亡人数逐年无显著变化。结论:在2019冠状病毒病期间,所有青少年的自杀相关急诊科就诊都有所增加,其中亚太裔和AI/AN女性的上升幅度最大。8-12岁和13-17岁的亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民女性的增幅尤其大。虽然无法推断因果关系,但这种模式与大流行造成的破坏和反亚洲仇恨犯罪相一致。研究结果强调了交叉分析的价值,以确定不成比例的受影响的亚群体,并为未来的文化响应性自杀预防工作提供信息。
{"title":"Intersectional Analysis of Suicide-related Emergency Department Visits in Youth in California, 2018-2021.","authors":"Laura M Prichett, Annie Na, Hanae Fujii-Rios, Emily E Haroz","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47097","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and related anti-Asian political rhetoric had a detrimental impact on the mental health of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) youth in the United States. Our objective was to quantify trends in suicide-related emergency department (ED) encounters among AAPI youth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, using an intersectional lens of race and sex and to contextualize these trends on a timeline of political and social events (such as anti-Asian hate crimes) occurring during the same period in California.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the California State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) from 2018-2021, we evaluated changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED encounters by age, race, and sex subgroups by comparing mean percentage change in proportions before and during the pandemic among patients 8-21 years of age. We evaluated changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED encounters by age, race, and sex subgroups by comparing mean percentage changes as they related to events around the pandemic and spikes in anti-Asian hate crimes. To compare relative disparities during the periods, we used stratified adjusted mixed multilevel logistic regression, with White males as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall increase in suicide-related ED visits for all youth during this period was 49.5% (95% CI 46.7-52.2%), representing 2,637 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018. The graphical observational analysis of changes in quarterly proportions of suicide-related ED visits showed some temporal correlation between spikes in rates among AAPI and American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) females and specific events, such as anti-Asian hate crimes and school closings. The largest percentage increase was seen among females of all races, and in particular, AI/AN females (+58.1%, representing 471 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018) and AAPI females (+57.5%, representing 1,545 more suicide-related ED visits in 2021 than 2018). During the pandemic, the adjusted odds of a suicide-related ED visit among AAPI females 13-17 years of age compared to White males was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.91-2.13). A total of 131 in-ED deaths occurred during the study period, with no significant year-to-year variation in the number of deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suicide-related ED visits increased for all youth during COVID-19, with the sharpest rise among AAPI and AI/AN females. Asian American and Pacific Islander females 8-12 and 13-17 years of age showed especially large increases. While causality cannot be inferred, patterns aligned with pandemic disruptions and anti-Asian hate crimes. Findings highlight the value of intersectional analysis to identify disproportionately impacted subgroups and inform future, culturally responsive suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1611-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in Admission Rates of Children with Pneumonia Between Pediatric and Community Emergency Departments. 儿科与社区急诊科肺炎患儿住院率的差异
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.47221
Grace VanGorder, Samuel Lee, Zachary Jensen, Susan Boehmer, Robert P Olympia
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pneumonia is the most common cause of pediatric death worldwide. We sought to determine whether the rate of hospital admission of pediatric patients diagnosed with pneumonia at a dedicated pediatric-emergency department (PED) is different than the rate at a community emergency department (CED). This comparison may provide insight into decision-making and factors associated with admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study we reviewed patient records from January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019 for pediatric patients diagnosed with pneumonia. We excluded patients who were not prescribed antibiotics, those who did not receive a chest radiograph or had no radiologic signs of pneumonia. In addition, we excluded patients with comorbid conditions such as tracheostomy, supplemental oxygen requirement at baseline, chronic lung disease other than asthma or reactive airway disease, any cancer diagnosis, cystic fibrosis, or congenital heart disease. The primary outcome was the proportion of pneumonia diagnoses that resulted in admission from the PED vs CED. We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate which clinical factors were associated with hospital admission. Significance levels were determined by chi-square test or the Fisher exact test and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 400 pediatric patients with pneumonia, 182 from the PED and 218 from the CED. There was a significant difference in admission rates between the two hospitals: 53 of 182 patients in the PED were admitted (29.1%) vs 27 of 218 patients in the CED (12.4%, P < .001). Patients in the PED were, therefore, 2.35 times more likely to be admitted than those at the CED (odds ratio 5.1, 95% CI, 2.5-10.4). Patients presenting to the PED were more likely to arrive via ambulance (10.7% vs 3.1%, P = .04) and to be hypoxic upon arrival (13.2% vs 3.2%, P < .001). The median age of patients in the PED was significantly higher than the CED (6.0 years vs 2.0 years, P < .001). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the CED identified as Hispanic or Latino (68.6% vs 20.3%, P < .001). Patients in the CED were more likely to be insured (11.0% vs 19.9%, P = .01). There was no significant difference in immunization status between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients presenting to a dedicated pediatric ED had a higher admission rate than did those at a community ED. Patients in the PED were more likely to arrive by ambulance and less likely to have active health insurance coverage. Patients at the PED were more likely to be hypoxic than patients at the CED. These findings highlight important practice differences between PEDs and CEDs that may inform strategies to improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, and promote more effective, evidence-based care. Future studies should further investigate the drivers of these variations and evaluate targeted interventions to optim
肺炎是全世界儿童死亡的最常见原因。我们试图确定在专门的儿科急诊科(PED)诊断为肺炎的儿科患者的住院率是否与社区急诊科(CED)的住院率不同。这种比较可以提供对决策和录取相关因素的深入了解。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们回顾了2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日诊断为肺炎的儿科患者的患者记录。我们排除了未开抗生素处方、未接受胸片检查或无肺炎影像学征象的患者。此外,我们排除了伴有合并症的患者,如气管切开术、基线补充氧气需求、哮喘或反应性气道疾病以外的慢性肺部疾病、任何癌症诊断、囊性纤维化或先天性心脏病。主要终点是肺炎诊断导致PED与CED住院的比例。我们使用逻辑回归分析来评估哪些临床因素与住院有关。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验和Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel统计量确定显著性水平。结果:我们确定了400例儿科肺炎患者,182例来自PED, 218例来自CED。两家医院的住院率有显著差异:182例PED患者中有53例(29.1%)住院,而218例CED患者中有27例(12.4%,P < 0.001)。因此,PED患者入院的可能性是CED患者的2.35倍(优势比5.1,95% CI, 2.5-10.4)。到PED就诊的患者更有可能通过救护车到达(10.7% vs 3.1%, P = 0.04),到达时缺氧(13.2% vs 3.2%, P < 0.001)。PED患者的中位年龄明显高于CED患者(6.0岁vs 2.0岁,P < 0.001)。在CED中,西班牙裔或拉丁裔患者的比例明显更高(68.6% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001)。在CED的患者更有可能参加保险(11.0% vs 19.9%, P = 0.01)。两组免疫状况无显著差异。结论:在专门的儿科急诊科就诊的患者比在社区急诊科就诊的患者有更高的入院率。在儿科急诊科就诊的患者更有可能是乘坐救护车来的,而且更不可能有积极的医疗保险。PED的患者比CED的患者更容易出现缺氧。这些发现强调了儿科医生和儿科医生之间的重要实践差异,这些差异可能为改善患者预后、降低成本和促进更有效的循证护理提供策略。未来的研究应进一步调查这些变化的驱动因素,并评估有针对性的干预措施,以优化不同环境下的护理。
{"title":"Differences in Admission Rates of Children with Pneumonia Between Pediatric and Community Emergency Departments.","authors":"Grace VanGorder, Samuel Lee, Zachary Jensen, Susan Boehmer, Robert P Olympia","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47221","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47221","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Pneumonia is the most common cause of pediatric death worldwide. We sought to determine whether the rate of hospital admission of pediatric patients diagnosed with pneumonia at a dedicated pediatric-emergency department (PED) is different than the rate at a community emergency department (CED). This comparison may provide insight into decision-making and factors associated with admission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this retrospective cohort study we reviewed patient records from January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019 for pediatric patients diagnosed with pneumonia. We excluded patients who were not prescribed antibiotics, those who did not receive a chest radiograph or had no radiologic signs of pneumonia. In addition, we excluded patients with comorbid conditions such as tracheostomy, supplemental oxygen requirement at baseline, chronic lung disease other than asthma or reactive airway disease, any cancer diagnosis, cystic fibrosis, or congenital heart disease. The primary outcome was the proportion of pneumonia diagnoses that resulted in admission from the PED vs CED. We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate which clinical factors were associated with hospital admission. Significance levels were determined by chi-square test or the Fisher exact test and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We identified 400 pediatric patients with pneumonia, 182 from the PED and 218 from the CED. There was a significant difference in admission rates between the two hospitals: 53 of 182 patients in the PED were admitted (29.1%) vs 27 of 218 patients in the CED (12.4%, P &lt; .001). Patients in the PED were, therefore, 2.35 times more likely to be admitted than those at the CED (odds ratio 5.1, 95% CI, 2.5-10.4). Patients presenting to the PED were more likely to arrive via ambulance (10.7% vs 3.1%, P = .04) and to be hypoxic upon arrival (13.2% vs 3.2%, P &lt; .001). The median age of patients in the PED was significantly higher than the CED (6.0 years vs 2.0 years, P &lt; .001). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the CED identified as Hispanic or Latino (68.6% vs 20.3%, P &lt; .001). Patients in the CED were more likely to be insured (11.0% vs 19.9%, P = .01). There was no significant difference in immunization status between the two groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients presenting to a dedicated pediatric ED had a higher admission rate than did those at a community ED. Patients in the PED were more likely to arrive by ambulance and less likely to have active health insurance coverage. Patients at the PED were more likely to be hypoxic than patients at the CED. These findings highlight important practice differences between PEDs and CEDs that may inform strategies to improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, and promote more effective, evidence-based care. Future studies should further investigate the drivers of these variations and evaluate targeted interventions to optim","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1729-1737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anticoagulation Treatment in Patients with Septic Thrombophlebitis of the Internal Jugular Vein. 颈内静脉脓毒性血栓性静脉炎的抗凝治疗。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.47130
Atsushi Senda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koji Morishita

Introduction: Septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein (STIJV), or Lemierre syndrome, is a rare, life-threatening condition. Anticoagulant use for managing STIJV remains unclear due to ambiguous diagnostic criteria and a lack of robust evidence. We evaluated the clinical benefits and risks of anticoagulants in patients with STIJV.

Methods: In this retrospective study we used data from over 1,700 hospitals, retrieved from a nationwide Japanese database. We used multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, level of consciousness, use of mechanical ventilation, use of disseminated intravascular coagulation, admission to intensive care unit, history of diabetes, use of noradrenaline, diagnosis of acute renal failure, and diagnosis of cerebral infarction). We also conducted instrumental variable estimation to account for the impact of unmeasured covariates. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, major bleeding events, and length of stay (LOS) in hospital.

Results: Among the 523 patients diagnosed with STIJV between April 1, 2014-March 31, 2022, 343 (65.6%) were excluded due to lack of appropriate treatment initiation for STIJV. Overall, 180 patients (34.4%) met the inclusion criteria; the data of 156 patients (31.1%) were ultimately analysed. Of these, 86 (55.1%) received anticoagulants, which neither significantly improved nor worsened survival outcomes. The in-hospital mortality was 3.39% and 1.69% and 90-day mortality was 2.54% and 1.69%, respectively, in patients who did and did not receive therapy, (P = .56 and .99, respectively). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for in-hospital and 90-day mortality was 0.858 (95% CI, 0.126-5.826, P = .88) and .991 (95% CI, .932-1.055, P = .79), respectively. The LOS was longer in those receiving anticoagulants (mean, 29.2 vs 21.8 days, AOR 11.7 days longer, 95% CI, 4.11-19.20, P < .01), potentially due to dose adjustment or clinical decision-making. Subgroup analysis comparing unfractionated heparin and direct Xa inhibitors showed similar in-hospital mortality outcomes: 4.54% in the unfractionated heparin group (AOR 2.361, 95% CI, 0.32-17.40; P = .40) and 3.03% in the direct Xa inhibitor group (AOR 0.444, 95% CI, 0.032-6.23; P = .55), respectively.

Conclusion: In the largest study of septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein to date, we found that early initiation of anticoagulation treatment was not statistically associated with survival. Therefore, anticoagulant use should be determined based on individual patient characteristics. Further research is warranted to improve the quality of evidence for this rare disease.

颈内静脉化脓性血栓性静脉炎(STIJV)或Lemierre综合征是一种罕见的危及生命的疾病。由于诊断标准不明确和缺乏有力证据,抗凝剂用于治疗STIJV仍不清楚。我们评估了STIJV患者使用抗凝剂的临床获益和风险。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们使用了从日本全国数据库中检索的1,700多家医院的数据。我们使用多变量logistic回归和倾向评分匹配来调整混杂变量(年龄、性别、Charlson合并症指数、意识水平、机械通气的使用、弥散性血管内凝血的使用、入住重症监护病房、糖尿病史、去甲肾上腺素的使用、急性肾功能衰竭的诊断和脑梗死的诊断)。我们还进行了工具变量估计,以解释未测量协变量的影响。主要结局是住院死亡率;次要结局为90天死亡率、大出血事件和住院时间(LOS)。结果:2014年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间诊断为STIJV的523例患者中,343例(65.6%)因缺乏适当的STIJV治疗而被排除在外。总体而言,180例患者(34.4%)符合纳入标准;156例患者(31.1%)的数据最终被分析。其中86例(55.1%)接受了抗凝治疗,但既没有显著改善也没有恶化生存结果。接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者住院死亡率分别为3.39%和1.69%,90天死亡率分别为2.54%和1.69%,P = 0.56和0.56。99年,分别)。住院死亡率和90天死亡率的调整优势比(AOR)为0.858 (95% CI, 0.126 ~ 5.826, P = 0.88)。991 (95% CI, 0.932 -1.055, P = 0.79)。接受抗凝剂治疗的患者LOS较长(平均29.2天vs 21.8天,AOR较长11.7天,95% CI, 4.11-19.20, P < 0.01),可能是剂量调整或临床决策所致。亚组分析比较未分离肝素和直接Xa抑制剂显示相似的住院死亡率结果:未分离肝素组为4.54% (AOR为2.361,95% CI为0.32-17.40;P = 0.40),直接Xa抑制剂组为3.03% (AOR为0.444,95% CI为0.032-6.23;P = 0.55)。结论:在迄今为止最大规模的颈内静脉化脓性血栓性静脉炎研究中,我们发现早期抗凝治疗与生存率无统计学相关性。因此,抗凝剂的使用应根据患者的个体特征来确定。有必要进一步研究以提高这种罕见疾病的证据质量。
{"title":"Anticoagulation Treatment in Patients with Septic Thrombophlebitis of the Internal Jugular Vein.","authors":"Atsushi Senda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koji Morishita","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47130","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein (STIJV), or Lemierre syndrome, is a rare, life-threatening condition. Anticoagulant use for managing STIJV remains unclear due to ambiguous diagnostic criteria and a lack of robust evidence. We evaluated the clinical benefits and risks of anticoagulants in patients with STIJV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study we used data from over 1,700 hospitals, retrieved from a nationwide Japanese database. We used multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, level of consciousness, use of mechanical ventilation, use of disseminated intravascular coagulation, admission to intensive care unit, history of diabetes, use of noradrenaline, diagnosis of acute renal failure, and diagnosis of cerebral infarction). We also conducted instrumental variable estimation to account for the impact of unmeasured covariates. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, major bleeding events, and length of stay (LOS) in hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 523 patients diagnosed with STIJV between April 1, 2014-March 31, 2022, 343 (65.6%) were excluded due to lack of appropriate treatment initiation for STIJV. Overall, 180 patients (34.4%) met the inclusion criteria; the data of 156 patients (31.1%) were ultimately analysed. Of these, 86 (55.1%) received anticoagulants, which neither significantly improved nor worsened survival outcomes. The in-hospital mortality was 3.39% and 1.69% and 90-day mortality was 2.54% and 1.69%, respectively, in patients who did and did not receive therapy, (P = .56 and .99, respectively). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for in-hospital and 90-day mortality was 0.858 (95% CI, 0.126-5.826, P = .88) and .991 (95% CI, .932-1.055, P = .79), respectively. The LOS was longer in those receiving anticoagulants (mean, 29.2 vs 21.8 days, AOR 11.7 days longer, 95% CI, 4.11-19.20, P < .01), potentially due to dose adjustment or clinical decision-making. Subgroup analysis comparing unfractionated heparin and direct Xa inhibitors showed similar in-hospital mortality outcomes: 4.54% in the unfractionated heparin group (AOR 2.361, 95% CI, 0.32-17.40; P = .40) and 3.03% in the direct Xa inhibitor group (AOR 0.444, 95% CI, 0.032-6.23; P = .55), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the largest study of septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein to date, we found that early initiation of anticoagulation treatment was not statistically associated with survival. Therefore, anticoagulant use should be determined based on individual patient characteristics. Further research is warranted to improve the quality of evidence for this rare disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1590-1597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Program Director Perspectives on the Impact of the Proposed 48-Month Emergency Medicine Residency Requirement: A National Survey. 项目主管对提议的48个月急诊医学住院医师要求的影响的观点:一项全国调查。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.48359
Richard Austin, Chinmay Patel, Kristin Delfino, Sharon Kim

Introduction: In early 2025, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) announced proposed revisions to emergency medicine (EM) residency training to include substantial changes to the length of training programs, required rotations, and structured experiences. To date, no published national survey has sought to determine how these changes would impact individual programs.

Methods: Over a three-week period in April 2025, we anonymously surveyed program directors or their designees online through the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine listserv. Survey respondents were asked about the impact the changes would have on their programs and their overall opinions of the proposed 48-month minimum requirement.

Results: A total of 86 program directors responded to the survey (response rate of 29.9%) with representative samples from current three-year (83.7%, 72/86) and four-year (16.3%, 14/86) programs. Most program directors reported that they would have to make significant revisions in either structured experiences, required rotations, or both. Most survey respondents from three-year programs (52/72) do not support the proposed changes, whereas all respondents from four-year programs (14/14) do support the changes (P<.001).

Conclusion: Proposed program requirements may require modifications in both three- and four-year programs; 33 of the 86 program directors surveyed reported that would need more than one year to meet the requirements, if adopted. This raises the concern that programs may not be prepared to implement the revisions within the proposed timeline, potentially impacting resident education and the future EM workforce. The ACGME should consider a staged rollout of requirements to allow them to be thoughtfully implemented in a meaningful way.

简介:在2025年初,研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)宣布了对急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训的修订建议,包括对培训计划长度、所需轮岗和结构化经验的实质性改变。到目前为止,还没有公布的全国性调查试图确定这些变化将如何影响个别项目。方法:在2025年4月为期三周的时间里,我们通过急诊医学住院医师主任委员会的名单服务在线匿名调查了项目主任或其指定的人员。调查对象被问及这些变化将对他们的课程产生的影响,以及他们对拟议的48个月最低要求的总体看法。结果:共有86名项目主任对调查进行了回应(回复率为29.9%),其中有代表性的样本来自当前的三年制项目(83.7%,72/86)和四年制项目(16.3%,14/86)。大多数项目主管报告说,他们将不得不在结构化的经验、所需的轮岗或两者中做出重大修改。大多数来自三年制课程的受访者(52/72)不支持拟议的变化,而来自四年制课程的受访者(14/14)都支持这些变化(PConclusion:拟议的课程要求可能需要在三年制和四年制课程中进行修改;接受调查的86名项目主管中有33人表示,如果采用,将需要一年以上的时间才能满足要求。这引起了人们的担忧,即计划可能没有准备好在拟议的时间表内实施修订,这可能会影响居民教育和未来的新兴市场劳动力。ACGME应该考虑分阶段推出需求,以允许它们以有意义的方式得到深思熟虑的实现。
{"title":"Program Director Perspectives on the Impact of the Proposed 48-Month Emergency Medicine Residency Requirement: A National Survey.","authors":"Richard Austin, Chinmay Patel, Kristin Delfino, Sharon Kim","doi":"10.5811/westjem.48359","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.48359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In early 2025, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) announced proposed revisions to emergency medicine (EM) residency training to include substantial changes to the length of training programs, required rotations, and structured experiences. To date, no published national survey has sought to determine how these changes would impact individual programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a three-week period in April 2025, we anonymously surveyed program directors or their designees online through the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine listserv. Survey respondents were asked about the impact the changes would have on their programs and their overall opinions of the proposed 48-month minimum requirement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 program directors responded to the survey (response rate of 29.9%) with representative samples from current three-year (83.7%, 72/86) and four-year (16.3%, 14/86) programs. Most program directors reported that they would have to make significant revisions in either structured experiences, required rotations, or both. Most survey respondents from three-year programs (52/72) do not support the proposed changes, whereas all respondents from four-year programs (14/14) do support the changes (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proposed program requirements may require modifications in both three- and four-year programs; 33 of the 86 program directors surveyed reported that would need more than one year to meet the requirements, if adopted. This raises the concern that programs may not be prepared to implement the revisions within the proposed timeline, potentially impacting resident education and the future EM workforce. The ACGME should consider a staged rollout of requirements to allow them to be thoughtfully implemented in a meaningful way.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1504-1509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing Fluid Resuscitation Strategies: A Network Meta-analysis of Effectiveness and Safety for Hemorrhagic Shock Patients in Emergency Settings. 优化液体复苏策略:急诊失血性休克患者有效性和安全性的网络荟萃分析。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.47198
Fan Maitri Aldian, Visuddho Visuddho, Michelle Vanessa Anggarkusuma, Jesphine Arbi Wijaya, Anthony Camilo Lim, Galen Chandrawira, Yan Efrata Sembiring, Bambang Pujo Semedi, Jeffrey Jeswant Dillon

Introduction: Hemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening condition and remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Current European guidelines lack recommendations for one fluid type over another in the management of hemorrhagic shock. This study explores the effectiveness and safety of colloids and crystalloids in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane Cenral Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) up to January 3, 2024. We performed data analyses using Rstudio v.4.4.1 in Frequentist network meta-analysis with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Subgroup and network meta-regression analyses was also performed in Bayesian methods. We analyzed safety aspects using meta-proportions with generalized linear mixed models models.

Results: A total of 3,693 patients from 23 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. Synthetic colloid demonstrated the lowest mortality rate (odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI, 0.15-0.93; P-score = .94) with the lowest fluid input requirement (mean difference -1.02; 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.41; P-score = .75). Subgroup and network meta-regression analysis revealed none of the covariates significantly influenced these two outcomes. Regarding safety aspects, isotonic crystalloid caused the most diverse adverse events, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (prop = 0.067) and overload syndrome (prop = 0.063) being the most common adverse events.

Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence favoring the initial use of synthetic colloid in the management of patients with hemorrhagic shock.

失血性休克是一种危及生命的疾病,在世界范围内仍然是导致死亡的主要原因。目前的欧洲指南在失血性休克的治疗中缺乏一种液体类型的推荐。本研究探讨胶体和晶体在失血性休克患者复苏中的有效性和安全性。方法:我们在PubMed、Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)、Scopus、Web of Science、ProQuest和护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)中进行了截至2024年1月3日的系统检索。我们使用Rstudio v.4.4.1在Frequentist网络元分析中使用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型进行数据分析。采用贝叶斯方法进行亚组和网络元回归分析。我们使用广义线性混合模型的元比例模型分析了安全方面。结果:23项随机对照试验共纳入3693例患者。合成胶体显示出最低的死亡率(优势比0.37,95% CI, 0.15-0.93; p评分= 0.94)和最低的液体输入需求(平均差为-1.02;95% CI, -1.62至-0.41;p评分= 0.75)。亚组和网络元回归分析显示,协变量均未显著影响这两个结果。在安全性方面,等渗晶体引起的不良事件最为多样,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(prop = 0.067)和过载综合征(prop = 0.063)是最常见的不良事件。结论:本研究为初次使用合成胶体治疗失血性休克患者提供了强有力的证据。
{"title":"Optimizing Fluid Resuscitation Strategies: A Network Meta-analysis of Effectiveness and Safety for Hemorrhagic Shock Patients in Emergency Settings.","authors":"Fan Maitri Aldian, Visuddho Visuddho, Michelle Vanessa Anggarkusuma, Jesphine Arbi Wijaya, Anthony Camilo Lim, Galen Chandrawira, Yan Efrata Sembiring, Bambang Pujo Semedi, Jeffrey Jeswant Dillon","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47198","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening condition and remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Current European guidelines lack recommendations for one fluid type over another in the management of hemorrhagic shock. This study explores the effectiveness and safety of colloids and crystalloids in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane Cenral Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) up to January 3, 2024. We performed data analyses using Rstudio v.4.4.1 in Frequentist network meta-analysis with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Subgroup and network meta-regression analyses was also performed in Bayesian methods. We analyzed safety aspects using meta-proportions with generalized linear mixed models models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,693 patients from 23 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. Synthetic colloid demonstrated the lowest mortality rate (odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI, 0.15-0.93; P-score = .94) with the lowest fluid input requirement (mean difference -1.02; 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.41; P-score = .75). Subgroup and network meta-regression analysis revealed none of the covariates significantly influenced these two outcomes. Regarding safety aspects, isotonic crystalloid caused the most diverse adverse events, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (prop = 0.067) and overload syndrome (prop = 0.063) being the most common adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides robust evidence favoring the initial use of synthetic colloid in the management of patients with hemorrhagic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1795-1803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698173/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1