Dietrich Jehle, Krishna K Paul, Stanley Troung, Jackson M Rogers, Blake Mireles, John J Straub, Georgiy Golovko, Matthew M Talbott, Ronald W Lindsey, Charles P Mouton
Introduction: Patients with long bone fractures often present to the emergency department (ED) with severe pain and are typically treated with opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Historical data reveals racial disparities in analgesic administration, with White patients more likely to receive analgesics. With the diversifying US population, health equity is increasingly crucial. In this study we aimed to evaluate the early administration of opioid and non-opioid analgesia among Black and White patients with long bone and femur fractures in EDs over different time frames using a substantial database.
Methods: We retrospectively extracted Information from 57 US healthcare organizations within the TriNetX database, encompassing 95 million patients. The ED records from 2003-2023 were subjected to propensity score matching for age and gender. We focused on four cohorts: two comprising Black and White patients diagnosed with long bone fractures, and another two with Black and White patients diagnosed solely with femur fractures. We examined analgesic administration rates over 20 years (2003-2023) at five-year intervals (2003-2008; 2008-2013; 2013-2018; 2018-2023), and further analyzed the rates for the most recent two-year period (2021-2023).
Results: Disparities in analgesic administration significantly diminished over the study period. For patients with long bone fractures (1,095,052), the opioid administration gap narrowed from 6.3% to 1.1%, while non-opioid administration disparities reduced from 4.4% to 0.3%. Similar trends were noted for femur fractures (265,181). By 2021-2023, no significant differences in analgesic administration were observed between racial groups.
Conclusion: Over the past 20 years, the gap in early administration of opioid and non-opioid analgesics for Black and White patients presenting with long bone fractures or femur fractures has been disappearing.
{"title":"Equity in the Early Pain Management of Long Bone Fractures in Black vs White Patients: We Have Closed the Gap.","authors":"Dietrich Jehle, Krishna K Paul, Stanley Troung, Jackson M Rogers, Blake Mireles, John J Straub, Georgiy Golovko, Matthew M Talbott, Ronald W Lindsey, Charles P Mouton","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18531","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.18531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with long bone fractures often present to the emergency department (ED) with severe pain and are typically treated with opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Historical data reveals racial disparities in analgesic administration, with White patients more likely to receive analgesics. With the diversifying US population, health equity is increasingly crucial. In this study we aimed to evaluate the early administration of opioid and non-opioid analgesia among Black and White patients with long bone and femur fractures in EDs over different time frames using a substantial database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively extracted Information from 57 US healthcare organizations within the TriNetX database, encompassing 95 million patients. The ED records from 2003-2023 were subjected to propensity score matching for age and gender. We focused on four cohorts: two comprising Black and White patients diagnosed with long bone fractures, and another two with Black and White patients diagnosed solely with femur fractures. We examined analgesic administration rates over 20 years (2003-2023) at five-year intervals (2003-2008; 2008-2013; 2013-2018; 2018-2023), and further analyzed the rates for the most recent two-year period (2021-2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disparities in analgesic administration significantly diminished over the study period. For patients with long bone fractures (1,095,052), the opioid administration gap narrowed from 6.3% to 1.1%, while non-opioid administration disparities reduced from 4.4% to 0.3%. Similar trends were noted for femur fractures (265,181). By 2021-2023, no significant differences in analgesic administration were observed between racial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the past 20 years, the gap in early administration of opioid and non-opioid analgesics for Black and White patients presenting with long bone fractures or femur fractures has been disappearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"809-816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418864/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giselle Appel, Ahmed T Shahzad, Kestrel Reopelle, Stephen DiDonato, Frances Rusnack, Dimitrios Papanagnou
Purpose: During the third-year emergency medicine (EM) clerkship, medical students are immersed in traumatic incidents with their patients and clinical teams. Trauma-informed medical education (TIME) applies trauma-informed care (TIC) principles to help students manage trauma. We aimed to qualitatively describe the extent to which students perceived the six TIME domains as they navigated critical incidents during their EM clerkship.
Methods: We employed a constructivist, modified grounded theory approach to explore medical students' experiences. We used the critical incident technique to elicit narratives to better understand the six TIME domains as they naturally appear in the clerkship. Participants were asked to describe a traumatic incident they experienced during the clerkship, followed by the clerkship's role in helping them manage the incident. Using the framework method, transcripts were analyzed 1) deductively by matching transcript excerpts to relevant TIME domains and 2) inductively by generating de novo themes to capture factors that affected students' handling of trauma during critical incidents.
Results: Twelve participants were enrolled and interviewed in July 2022. "Safety" was the most frequently described TIME domain, whereas "Gender, Cultural, and Historical issues" and "Peer Support" were discussed least. Inductive analysis revealed themes that hindered or supported their ability to manage traumatic experiences, which were grouped into three categories: 1) student interactions with the learning environment: complex social determinants of health, inequalities in care, and overt discrimination; 2) student interactions with patients: ethically ambiguous care, witnessing acute patient presentations, and reactivation of past trauma; and 3) student interactions with supervisors: power dynamics, invalidation of contributions, role-modeling, and student empowerment.
Conclusion: The six TIME domains are represented in students' perceptions of immediate, stressful critical incidents during their EM clerkship, with "Safety" being the most commonly described; however, the degree to which these domains are supported in students' experiences of the EM clerkship differ, and instances of inadequately experienced domains may contribute to student distress. Understanding the EM clerkship through the specific lens of students' experiences of trauma may be an effective strategy to guide curricular changes that promote a supportive learning environment for students in the emergency department.
目的:在三年级急诊医学(EM)实习期间,医科学生要与病人和临床团队一起经历创伤事件。创伤知情医学教育(TIME)应用创伤知情护理(TIC)原则帮助学生处理创伤。我们旨在定性描述学生在急诊实习期间处理危重事件时对 TIME 六个领域的感知程度:我们采用了建构主义的修正基础理论方法来探索医学生的经验。我们采用了关键事件技术来引出叙述,以更好地理解实习中自然出现的六个 TIME 领域。我们要求参与者描述他们在实习期间经历的创伤性事件,然后描述实习在帮助他们处理该事件中所扮演的角色。采用框架法对记录誊本进行了分析:1)通过将记录誊本摘录与相关的 TIME 领域进行匹配进行演绎分析;2)通过生成新的主题进行归纳分析,以捕捉影响学生在关键事件中处理创伤的因素:2022 年 7 月,对 12 名参与者进行了访谈。"安全 "是最常被描述的 TIME 领域,而 "性别、文化和历史问题 "和 "同伴支持 "则最少被讨论。归纳分析揭示了阻碍或支持他们管理创伤经历能力的主题,这些主题可分为三类:1)学生与学习环境的互动:复杂的健康社会决定因素、护理中的不平等和公开的歧视;2)学生与患者的互动:伦理上模糊的护理、目睹急性患者的表现和过去创伤的重新激活;3)学生与督导的互动:权力动态、贡献的无效性、角色示范和学生赋权:六大 TIME 领域在学生对急诊实习期间发生的直接、紧张的危急事件的感知中有所体现,其中 "安全 "是最常见的描述;然而,这些领域在学生的急诊实习经历中得到支持的程度各不相同,经历不足的领域可能会造成学生的痛苦。通过学生的创伤经历这一特定视角来理解急诊实习,可能是指导课程改革的有效策略,从而为急诊科学生营造一个支持性的学习环境。
{"title":"Exploring Medical Student Experiences of Trauma in the Emergency Department: Opportunities for Trauma-informed Medical Education.","authors":"Giselle Appel, Ahmed T Shahzad, Kestrel Reopelle, Stephen DiDonato, Frances Rusnack, Dimitrios Papanagnou","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During the third-year emergency medicine (EM) clerkship, medical students are immersed in traumatic incidents with their patients and clinical teams. Trauma-informed medical education (TIME) applies trauma-informed care (TIC) principles to help students manage trauma. We aimed to qualitatively describe the extent to which students perceived the six TIME domains as they navigated critical incidents during their EM clerkship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a constructivist, modified grounded theory approach to explore medical students' experiences. We used the critical incident technique to elicit narratives to better understand the six TIME domains as they naturally appear in the clerkship. Participants were asked to describe a traumatic incident they experienced during the clerkship, followed by the clerkship's role in helping them manage the incident. Using the framework method, transcripts were analyzed 1) deductively by matching transcript excerpts to relevant TIME domains and 2) inductively by generating de novo themes to capture factors that affected students' handling of trauma during critical incidents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve participants were enrolled and interviewed in July 2022. \"Safety\" was the most frequently described TIME domain, whereas \"Gender, Cultural, and Historical issues\" and \"Peer Support\" were discussed least. Inductive analysis revealed themes that hindered or supported their ability to manage traumatic experiences, which were grouped into three categories: 1) student interactions with the learning environment: complex social determinants of health, inequalities in care, and overt discrimination; 2) student interactions with patients: ethically ambiguous care, witnessing acute patient presentations, and reactivation of past trauma; and 3) student interactions with supervisors: power dynamics, invalidation of contributions, role-modeling, and student empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The six TIME domains are represented in students' perceptions of immediate, stressful critical incidents during their EM clerkship, with \"Safety\" being the most commonly described; however, the degree to which these domains are supported in students' experiences of the EM clerkship differ, and instances of inadequately experienced domains may contribute to student distress. Understanding the EM clerkship through the specific lens of students' experiences of trauma may be an effective strategy to guide curricular changes that promote a supportive learning environment for students in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"828-837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gillian Cooper, Vainavi Gambhir, Zoe Gasparotti, Samantha Camp, William Gum, Robinson Okolo, Riya Raikar, Chad Schrier, Jessica Downing, Quincy K Tran
{"title":"Comments on \"A Shorter Door-in-Door-out Time Is Associated with Improved Outcome in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke\".","authors":"Gillian Cooper, Vainavi Gambhir, Zoe Gasparotti, Samantha Camp, William Gum, Robinson Okolo, Riya Raikar, Chad Schrier, Jessica Downing, Quincy K Tran","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18668","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"856-857"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea Roche, Evan Watkins, Andrew Pettit, Jacob Slagle, Isain Zapata, Andrew Seefeld, Nena Lundgreen Mason
Introduction: When used appropriately, focused limited-scope ultrasound exams could potentially provide paramedics with accurate and actionable diagnostic information to guide prehospital decision-making. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of a 13-hour prehospital ultrasound training course on the simulated clinical decision-making of paramedics as well as their ultrasound skills, knowledge, and self-confidence.
Methods: We evaluated the ultrasound competence of 31 participants using post-course written and practical assessments. Written clinical decision scenarios were administered pre- and post-training. Post-training scenarios included an uninterpreted ultrasound clip to aid decision-making. Scenarios included extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma, pulmonary exam, and focused echocardiography combined with carotid pulse check exams. Correct answers to scenarios were defined as those selected by a veteran emergency physician. Participants also indicated their confidence in each of their decisions using a Likert scale.
Results: Training yielded a statistically significant increase in both mean scenario score (35.5% absolute increase) and mean participant self-confidence (15.8% relative increase), across all exam/decision types assessed (P ≤ 0.001). The focused pulmonary exam yielded the largest increase in both mean score improvement (59.7% absolute increase) and paramedic confidence in their decisions (28.6% increase).
Conclusion: Trained paramedics can perform focused ultrasound exams and accurately interpret and apply actionable exam findings in the context of written scenarios. Analysis through our model characterized the theoretical clinical yield of each prehospital ultrasound exam and demonstrated how each exam may provide improved decision accuracy in several specific simulated clinical contexts. These results provide support for growing evidence that focused limited-scope ultrasound may be an effective prehospital diagnostic tool in the hands of trained paramedics.
{"title":"Impact of Prehospital Ultrasound Training on Simulated Paramedic Clinical Decision-Making.","authors":"Andrea Roche, Evan Watkins, Andrew Pettit, Jacob Slagle, Isain Zapata, Andrew Seefeld, Nena Lundgreen Mason","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When used appropriately, focused limited-scope ultrasound exams could potentially provide paramedics with accurate and actionable diagnostic information to guide prehospital decision-making. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of a 13-hour prehospital ultrasound training course on the simulated clinical decision-making of paramedics as well as their ultrasound skills, knowledge, and self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the ultrasound competence of 31 participants using post-course written and practical assessments. Written clinical decision scenarios were administered pre- and post-training. Post-training scenarios included an uninterpreted ultrasound clip to aid decision-making. Scenarios included extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma, pulmonary exam, and focused echocardiography combined with carotid pulse check exams. Correct answers to scenarios were defined as those selected by a veteran emergency physician. Participants also indicated their confidence in each of their decisions using a Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Training yielded a statistically significant increase in both mean scenario score (35.5% absolute increase) and mean participant self-confidence (15.8% relative increase), across all exam/decision types assessed (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). The focused pulmonary exam yielded the largest increase in both mean score improvement (59.7% absolute increase) and paramedic confidence in their decisions (28.6% increase).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trained paramedics can perform focused ultrasound exams and accurately interpret and apply actionable exam findings in the context of written scenarios. Analysis through our model characterized the theoretical clinical yield of each prehospital ultrasound exam and demonstrated how each exam may provide improved decision accuracy in several specific simulated clinical contexts. These results provide support for growing evidence that focused limited-scope ultrasound may be an effective prehospital diagnostic tool in the hands of trained paramedics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"784-792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418876/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel Wolfson, Roz King, Miles Lamberson, Jackson Lyttleton, Colin T Waters, Samantha H Schneider, Blake A Porter, Kyle M DeWitt, Peter Jackson, Martha W Stevens, John Brooklyn, Richard Rawson, Elly Riser
Introduction: Overdose deaths from high-potency synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and its analogs, continue to rise along with emergency department (ED) visits for complications of opioid use disorder (OUD). Fentanyl accumulates in adipose tissue; although rare, this increases the risk of precipitated withdrawal in patients upon buprenorphine initiation. Many EDs have implemented medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) programs using buprenorphine. However, few offer methadone, a proven therapy without the risk of precipitated withdrawal associated with buprenorphine initiation. We describe the addition of an ED-initiated methadone treatment pathway and compared its 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates to our existing ED-initiated buprenorphine MOUD program.
Methods: We expanded our ED MOUD program with a methadone treatment pathway. From February 20-September 19, 2023, we screened 20,504 ED arrivals; 5.1% had signs of OUD. We enrolled 61 patients: 28 in the methadone; and 33 in the buprenorphine pathways. For patients who screened positive for opioid use, shared decision-making was employed to determine whether buprenorphine or methadone therapy was more appropriate. Patients in the methadone pathway received their first dose of up to 30 milligrams (mg) of methadone in the ED. Two additional methadone doses of up to 40 mg were dispensed at the time of the ED visit and held in the department, allowing patients to return each day for observed dosing until intake at an opioid treatment program (OTP). We compared 72-hour rates of outpatient follow-up treatment engagement at the OTP (for those on methadone) or at the addiction treatment center (ATC) (for those on buprenorphine) for the two treatment pathways.
Results: Of the 28 patients enrolled in the methadone pathway, 12 (43%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the OTP. Of the 33 patients enrolled in the buprenorphine pathway, 15 (45%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the ATC (relative risk 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.87).
Conclusion: Methadone initiation in the ED to treat patients with OUD resulted in similar 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates compared to ED-buprenorphine initiation, providing another viable option for MOUD.
{"title":"Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Daniel Wolfson, Roz King, Miles Lamberson, Jackson Lyttleton, Colin T Waters, Samantha H Schneider, Blake A Porter, Kyle M DeWitt, Peter Jackson, Martha W Stevens, John Brooklyn, Richard Rawson, Elly Riser","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18530","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overdose deaths from high-potency synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and its analogs, continue to rise along with emergency department (ED) visits for complications of opioid use disorder (OUD). Fentanyl accumulates in adipose tissue; although rare, this increases the risk of precipitated withdrawal in patients upon buprenorphine initiation. Many EDs have implemented medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) programs using buprenorphine. However, few offer methadone, a proven therapy without the risk of precipitated withdrawal associated with buprenorphine initiation. We describe the addition of an ED-initiated methadone treatment pathway and compared its 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates to our existing ED-initiated buprenorphine MOUD program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We expanded our ED MOUD program with a methadone treatment pathway. From February 20-September 19, 2023, we screened 20,504 ED arrivals; 5.1% had signs of OUD. We enrolled 61 patients: 28 in the methadone; and 33 in the buprenorphine pathways. For patients who screened positive for opioid use, shared decision-making was employed to determine whether buprenorphine or methadone therapy was more appropriate. Patients in the methadone pathway received their first dose of up to 30 milligrams (mg) of methadone in the ED. Two additional methadone doses of up to 40 mg were dispensed at the time of the ED visit and held in the department, allowing patients to return each day for observed dosing until intake at an opioid treatment program (OTP). We compared 72-hour rates of outpatient follow-up treatment engagement at the OTP (for those on methadone) or at the addiction treatment center (ATC) (for those on buprenorphine) for the two treatment pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28 patients enrolled in the methadone pathway, 12 (43%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the OTP. Of the 33 patients enrolled in the buprenorphine pathway, 15 (45%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the ATC (relative risk 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methadone initiation in the ED to treat patients with OUD resulted in similar 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates compared to ED-buprenorphine initiation, providing another viable option for MOUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"668-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418868/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marjorie A Erdmann, Ipe S Paramel, Cari Marshall, Karissa LeHew, Abigail Kee, Sarah Soliman, Monica Monica Vuong, Sydney Sydney Spillane, Joshua Joshua Baer, Shania Shania Do, Tiffany Tiffany Jones, Derek Derek McGuire
Objective: Because admitted emergency department (ED) patients waiting for an inpatient bed contribute to dangerous ED crowding, we conducted a patient flow investigation to discover and solve outflow delays. After solution implementation, we measured whether the time admitted ED patients waited to leave the ED was reduced.
Methods: In June 2022, a team using Lean Healthcare methodologies identified flow delays and underlying barriers in a Midwest, mid-sized hospital. We calculated barriers' magnitudes of burden by the frequency of involvement in delays. During October-December 2022, solutions targeting barriers were implemented. In October 2023, we tested whether waiting time, defined as daily median time in minutes from admission disposition to departure (ADtoD), declined by conducting independent sample, single-tailed t-test comparing pre- to post-intervention time periods, January 1-September 30, 2022 (273 days) to January 1-September 30, 2023 (273 days). Additionally, we regressed ADtoD onto pre-/post period while controlling for ED volume (total daily admissions and ED daily encounters) and hospital occupancy. A run chart analysis of monthly median ADtoD assessed improvement sustainability.
Results: Process mapping revealed that three departments (ED, environmental services [EVS], and transport services) co-produced the outflow of admitted ED patients wherein 18 delays were identified. The EVS-clinical care collaboration failures explained 61% (11/18) of delays. Technology contributed to 78% (14/18) of delays primarily because staff's technology did not display needed information, a condition we coined "digital blindness." Comparing pre- and post-intervention days (3,144 patients admitted pre-intervention and 3,256 patients post), the median minutes a patient waited (ADtoD) significantly decreased (96.4 to 87.1 minutes, P = 0.04), even while daily ED encounter volume significantly increased (110.7 to 117.3 encounters per day, P < 0.001). After controlling in regression for other factors associated with waiting, the intervention reduced ADtoD by 12.7 minutes per patient (standard error 5.10, P = 0.01; 95% confidence interval -22.7, -2.7). We estimate that the intervention translated to ED staff avoiding 689 hours of admitted patient boarding over nine months (ADtoD coefficient [-12.7 minutes] multiplied by post-intervention ED admissions [3,256] and divided by 60). Run chart analysis substantiated the intervention's sustainability over nine months.
Conclusion: After systemwide patient flow investigation, solutions resolving digital blindness and environmental services-clinical care collaboration failures significantly reduced ED admitted patient boarding.
{"title":"Reduced Time to Admit Emergency Department Patients to Inpatient Beds Using Outflow Barrier Analysis and Process Improvement.","authors":"Marjorie A Erdmann, Ipe S Paramel, Cari Marshall, Karissa LeHew, Abigail Kee, Sarah Soliman, Monica Monica Vuong, Sydney Sydney Spillane, Joshua Joshua Baer, Shania Shania Do, Tiffany Tiffany Jones, Derek Derek McGuire","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Because admitted emergency department (ED) patients waiting for an inpatient bed contribute to dangerous ED crowding, we conducted a patient flow investigation to discover and solve outflow delays. After solution implementation, we measured whether the time admitted ED patients waited to leave the ED was reduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June 2022, a team using Lean Healthcare methodologies identified flow delays and underlying barriers in a Midwest, mid-sized hospital. We calculated barriers' magnitudes of burden by the frequency of involvement in delays. During October-December 2022, solutions targeting barriers were implemented. In October 2023, we tested whether waiting time, defined as daily median time in minutes from admission disposition to departure (ADtoD), declined by conducting independent sample, single-tailed <i>t</i>-test comparing pre- to post-intervention time periods, January 1-September 30, 2022 (273 days) to January 1-September 30, 2023 (273 days). Additionally, we regressed ADtoD onto pre-/post period while controlling for ED volume (total daily admissions and ED daily encounters) and hospital occupancy. A run chart analysis of monthly median ADtoD assessed improvement sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Process mapping revealed that three departments (ED, environmental services [EVS], and transport services) co-produced the outflow of admitted ED patients wherein 18 delays were identified. The EVS-clinical care collaboration failures explained 61% (11/18) of delays. Technology contributed to 78% (14/18) of delays primarily because staff's technology did not display needed information, a condition we coined \"digital blindness.\" Comparing pre- and post-intervention days (3,144 patients admitted pre-intervention and 3,256 patients post), the median minutes a patient waited (ADtoD) significantly decreased (96.4 to 87.1 minutes, <i>P</i> = 0.04), even while daily ED encounter volume significantly increased (110.7 to 117.3 encounters per day, <i>P</i> < 0.001). After controlling in regression for other factors associated with waiting, the intervention reduced ADtoD by 12.7 minutes per patient (standard error 5.10, <i>P</i> = 0.01; 95% confidence interval -22.7, -2.7). We estimate that the intervention translated to ED staff avoiding 689 hours of admitted patient boarding over nine months (ADtoD coefficient [-12.7 minutes] multiplied by post-intervention ED admissions [3,256] and divided by 60). Run chart analysis substantiated the intervention's sustainability over nine months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After systemwide patient flow investigation, solutions resolving digital blindness and environmental services-clinical care collaboration failures significantly reduced ED admitted patient boarding.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"748-757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418872/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Naomi P Newton, Christopher Freeman, Patricia Panakos
Introduction: Social medicine seeks to incorporate patients' social contexts into their medical care. Emergency physicians are uniquely positioned to address social determinants of health (SDoH) on the frontlines of the healthcare system. Miami-Dade County (MDC) is a diverse and socially vulnerable area. In 2020, the University of Miami-Jackson Health System (UM-JHS) emergency medicine (EM) residency program launched a multimodal, resident-led Social EM program to identify and address SDoH in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: We use a four-pillar approach to SDoH in the ED: Curriculum Integration; Community Outreach; Access to Care; and Social Justice. Residents graduate with a knowledge of Social EM principles through an 18-month curriculum, an elective, and a longitudinal track. We developed sustainable initiatives through interdepartmental and community-based partnerships, including a Narcan distribution initiative, an ED-based program linking uninsured patients to follow-up care, a human trafficking education initiative, and a quality improvement initiative for incarcerated patients.
Results: Given that the 18-month curriculum was launched in 2022, a full rotation of the curriculum had not been completed as of this writing, and data collection and analysis is an ongoing process. The initial pretest and post-test survey data show improvement in knowledge and confidence in managing Social EM topics. The Narcan initiative has screened 1,188 patients, of whom 144 have received Narcan. The ED-based patient navigation program has enrolled 31 patients to date, 18 of whom obtained outpatient care. Analysis of the impact/effectiveness of the program's other initiatives is ongoing.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is one of the most robust social EM programs to date, as many other programs primarily focus on service opportunities. Rooted in the revised principles of Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive learning, this program moves beyond understanding Social EM tenets to generating solutions to address SDoH in and outside the ED.
{"title":"Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program.","authors":"Naomi P Newton, Christopher Freeman, Patricia Panakos","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social medicine seeks to incorporate patients' social contexts into their medical care. Emergency physicians are uniquely positioned to address social determinants of health (SDoH) on the frontlines of the healthcare system. Miami-Dade County (MDC) is a diverse and socially vulnerable area. In 2020, the University of Miami-Jackson Health System (UM-JHS) emergency medicine (EM) residency program launched a multimodal, resident-led Social EM program to identify and address SDoH in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a four-pillar approach to SDoH in the ED: Curriculum Integration; Community Outreach; Access to Care; and Social Justice. Residents graduate with a knowledge of Social EM principles through an 18-month curriculum, an elective, and a longitudinal track. We developed sustainable initiatives through interdepartmental and community-based partnerships, including a Narcan distribution initiative, an ED-based program linking uninsured patients to follow-up care, a human trafficking education initiative, and a quality improvement initiative for incarcerated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Given that the 18-month curriculum was launched in 2022, a full rotation of the curriculum had not been completed as of this writing, and data collection and analysis is an ongoing process. The initial pretest and post-test survey data show improvement in knowledge and confidence in managing Social EM topics. The Narcan initiative has screened 1,188 patients, of whom 144 have received Narcan. The ED-based patient navigation program has enrolled 31 patients to date, 18 of whom obtained outpatient care. Analysis of the impact/effectiveness of the program's other initiatives is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is one of the most robust social EM programs to date, as many other programs primarily focus on service opportunities. Rooted in the revised principles of Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive learning, this program moves beyond understanding Social EM tenets to generating solutions to address SDoH in and outside the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"739-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vamsi Balakrishnan, Anna Yang, Donald Jeanmonod, Harrison Courie, Spencer Thompson, Valerian Peterson, Rebecca Jeanmonod
Introduction: Determining which patients who meet systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have bacterial sepsis is a difficult challenge for emergency physicians. We sought to determine whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be used to exclude bacterial sepsis in adult patients who meet ≥2 SIRS criteria and are being evaluated for sepsis.
Methods: Consenting adult patients meeting ≥2 SIRS criteria and undergoing evaluation for sepsis were enrolled. We recorded patient age, gender, vital signs, and laboratory results. We then later reviewed health records for culture results, end organ dysfunction, survival to discharge, and final diagnoses. Patients were classified as having sepsis if they met ≥2 SIRS criteria and were ultimately diagnosed with a bacterial source. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and sensitivity and specificity analyses. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was created to determine test characteristics.
Results: A total of 231 patients had complete datasets. Patients' median age was 69 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-81), and 49.6% were male. There were 154 patients (66.7%) ultimately diagnosed with sepsis with an identified bacterial source, while 77 patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria had non-infectious reasons for their presentations (33.3%). Septic patients had a median NLR 12.36 (IQR [interquartile range] 7.29-21.69), compared to those without sepsis (median NLR 5.62, IQR 3.89-9.11, P < 0.001). The NLR value of 3 applied as a cutoff for sepsis had a sensitivity of 96.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-98.8), and a specificity of 18.2 (95% CI 10.6-29.0). The ROC for NLR had an area under the curve of 0.74.
Conclusion: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a sensitive tool to help determine which patients with abnormal SIRS screens have bacterial sepsis.
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.","authors":"Vamsi Balakrishnan, Anna Yang, Donald Jeanmonod, Harrison Courie, Spencer Thompson, Valerian Peterson, Rebecca Jeanmonod","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Determining which patients who meet systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have bacterial sepsis is a difficult challenge for emergency physicians. We sought to determine whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be used to exclude bacterial sepsis in adult patients who meet ≥2 SIRS criteria and are being evaluated for sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consenting adult patients meeting ≥2 SIRS criteria and undergoing evaluation for sepsis were enrolled. We recorded patient age, gender, vital signs, and laboratory results. We then later reviewed health records for culture results, end organ dysfunction, survival to discharge, and final diagnoses. Patients were classified as having sepsis if they met ≥2 SIRS criteria and were ultimately diagnosed with a bacterial source. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and sensitivity and specificity analyses. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was created to determine test characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 231 patients had complete datasets. Patients' median age was 69 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-81), and 49.6% were male. There were 154 patients (66.7%) ultimately diagnosed with sepsis with an identified bacterial source, while 77 patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria had non-infectious reasons for their presentations (33.3%). Septic patients had a median NLR 12.36 (IQR [interquartile range] 7.29-21.69), compared to those without sepsis (median NLR 5.62, IQR 3.89-9.11, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The NLR value of 3 applied as a cutoff for sepsis had a sensitivity of 96.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-98.8), and a specificity of 18.2 (95% CI 10.6-29.0). The ROC for NLR had an area under the curve of 0.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a sensitive tool to help determine which patients with abnormal SIRS screens have bacterial sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"690-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418870/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexis E Pelletier-Bui, Timothy Fallon, Liza Smith, Tania Strout, Michelle Fischer, Mark Olaf, Erin McDonough, Brian Barbas, Michael Cirone, Elizabeth Barrall Werley
Introduction: Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received.
Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the t-test for independent samples or analysis of variance.
Results: The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking).
Conclusion: The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.
导言:在 2022-2023 年住院医师培训申请周期中,急诊医学(EM)引入了 "项目信号"(Program signaling,简称 PS),使住院医师培训申请者能够表明他们对特定项目的偏好。在本研究中,我们评估了急诊医学项目主任(PD)在申请审核和排名中对PS的使用情况。本研究还探讨了项目特征与收到的信号数量之间的关系,以及与收到的信号数量相关的信号的相对重要性和利用率:这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的横断面研究,研究对象是经毕业医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)认证的电磁学住院医师培训项目中的PDs。我们使用描述性统计来描述住院医师培训项目的特点和围绕PS的实践。中心倾向和离散度量总结了连续变量。对于分类变量,我们采用卡方分析或费雪精确检验进行组间比较。连续变量的比较采用独立样本 t 检验或方差分析:回复率为 41%(n = 113/277)。大多数项目参与了 PS(n = 261/277 EM 项目,94.2%)。收到信号的平均数量为 60 个(范围为 2-203 个)。收到的信号因项目特点而异,包括地理位置和项目类型、持续时间、环境和寿命。大多数人在整体审查中使用 PS(52.2%),但其他用途因收到信号的申请比例而异。与标准化评估信等其他申请要素相比, PS 在申请审核(平均 2.9;1-5 级,1 = 不重要,5 = 极其重要)和排名表准备(2.1)中的重要性相对较低(审核 4.97,排名 4.90):本研究提供了对电磁学就职之年 PS 使用情况的深入了解。我们根据项目特点和收到的信号数量确定了信号的使用模式,可以为个别申请人和项目的信号分配和使用提供参考。在 EM 专业应对申请人数的波动和申请者人口结构的变化时,对信号使用的更细致的了解可以提供有价值的见解。
{"title":"Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: The 2022-2023 Program Director Experience.","authors":"Alexis E Pelletier-Bui, Timothy Fallon, Liza Smith, Tania Strout, Michelle Fischer, Mark Olaf, Erin McDonough, Brian Barbas, Michael Cirone, Elizabeth Barrall Werley","doi":"10.5811/westjem.19392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the <i>t</i>-test for independent samples or analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"715-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418878/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fiona E Gallahue, Louis J Ling, Leo Quigley, Dian Dowling Evans, Edward Salsberg, Robert E Suter, Catherine A Marco
Objective: The medical literature has demonstrated disparities and variability in physician salaries and, specifically, emergency physician (EP) salaries. We sought to investigate individual physician characteristics, including sex and educational background, together with individual preferences of graduating EPs, and their association with the salary of their first job.
Methods: The American College of Emergency Physicians and the George Washington University Mullan Institute surveyed 2019 graduating EPs. The survey included respondents' demographic and educational background, post-training job characteristics and location, hospital characteristics, importance of different personal priorities, and starting salaries. We performed a multivariable regression analysis to determine how salaries were associated with job types and individuals' characteristics.
Results: We sent surveys to 2,192 graduating residents in 2019. Of these, 487 (22.2%) responded, and 270 (55.4%) accepted first-time clinical jobs and included salary data (12.3% of all surveys sent). Male sex, osteopathic training, and full-time work were significantly associated with higher salary. Men and women prioritized different factors in their job search. Women were more likely to consider such factors as parental leave policy, proximity to family, desired practice setting, type of hospital, and desired location as important. Salary/compensation was considered very important by 51.8% of men and 29.6% of women. Men's median salary was $30,000 more than women's (p = 0.01, 95% CI +$6,929 -+$53,071), a significant pay differential.
Conclusion: Salaries of graduating emergency medicine residents are associated with the resident's sex and degree type: doctor of osteopathic medicine or doctor of allopathic medicine. Multiple factors may contribute to men having higher salaries than women, and some of this difference reflects different priorities in their job search. Women were more likely to consider job conditions and setting to be more important, while men considered salary and compensation more important.
{"title":"Association of Gender and Personal Choices with Salaries of New Emergency Medicine Graduates.","authors":"Fiona E Gallahue, Louis J Ling, Leo Quigley, Dian Dowling Evans, Edward Salsberg, Robert E Suter, Catherine A Marco","doi":"10.5811/westjem.33606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.33606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The medical literature has demonstrated disparities and variability in physician salaries and, specifically, emergency physician (EP) salaries. We sought to investigate individual physician characteristics, including sex and educational background, together with individual preferences of graduating EPs, and their association with the salary of their first job.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Emergency Physicians and the George Washington University Mullan Institute surveyed 2019 graduating EPs. The survey included respondents' demographic and educational background, post-training job characteristics and location, hospital characteristics, importance of different personal priorities, and starting salaries. We performed a multivariable regression analysis to determine how salaries were associated with job types and individuals' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We sent surveys to 2,192 graduating residents in 2019. Of these, 487 (22.2%) responded, and 270 (55.4%) accepted first-time clinical jobs and included salary data (12.3% of all surveys sent). Male sex, osteopathic training, and full-time work were significantly associated with higher salary. Men and women prioritized different factors in their job search. Women were more likely to consider such factors as parental leave policy, proximity to family, desired practice setting, type of hospital, and desired location as important. Salary/compensation was considered very important by 51.8% of men and 29.6% of women. Men's median salary was $30,000 more than women's (p = 0.01, 95% CI +$6,929 -+$53,071), a significant pay differential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salaries of graduating emergency medicine residents are associated with the resident's sex and degree type: doctor of osteopathic medicine or doctor of allopathic medicine. Multiple factors may contribute to men having higher salaries than women, and some of this difference reflects different priorities in their job search. Women were more likely to consider job conditions and setting to be more important, while men considered salary and compensation more important.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"800-808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418865/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}