Ertuğ Günsoy, Ahmet Aykut, Cem Yildirim, Mehmet Veysel Öncül
Introduction: Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAMed) has emerged as a prominent component of online medical communication, with X (formerly Twitter) serving as an active hub for professional exchange among clinicians. Despite its reach and influence, few longitudinal studies have examined how FOAMed content and engagement patterns evolve over time. In this study we aimed to analyze thematic shifts and user interaction trends in #FOAMed tweets over a five-year period.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective bibliometric and natural language processing (NLP) study of 6,000 high-engagement, English-language tweets tagged with #FOAMed, posted between January 1, 2020-December 31, 2024. Each month, the 100 tweets were selected from Twitter's "Top" tab and manually curated. We used latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify thematic clusters. Hashtag usage and engagement metrics were assessed using descriptive statistics and linear regression.
Results: We identified 10 distinct topics were identified through LDA modeling: point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education; neuro-radiology, cardiology-electrocardiogram (ECG); nephrology; and intensive care unit; ultrasound; prehospital/policy; webinars and learning; resuscitation scenarios; pediatric imaging; medical student education; and critical care and publications. Topic prevalence shifted over time: Early tweets focused on COVID-19 and critical care, while later years showed increasing attention to prehospital care, diagnostics, and POCUS. Mean tweet engagement peaked in 2023 (236.9 ± 914.6). Notably, hashtags such as #POCUS and #MedEd showed substantial increases in both usage and engagement, with #MedEd reaching a peak mean engagement of 287.7. In contrast, COVID-19 declined steadily, both in frequency (from 126 tweets in 2020 to just six in 2023) and in engagement (mean: 67.1 → 18.5). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that hashtag count had a weak but statistically significant correlation with engagement (ρ = 0.047, P < .001), suggesting that content quality, rather than volume, was the primary driver of visibility.
Conclusion: FOAMed discourse on Twitter/X remains dynamic, responsive to clinical priorities and shaped by peer interaction. Natural language processing and topic modeling are valuable tools to uncover longitudinal trends in digital medical education, reinforcing Twitter/X's role in informal, real-time learning communities.
简介:免费开放获取医学教育(FOAMed)已经成为在线医疗交流的重要组成部分,X(以前的Twitter)是临床医生之间专业交流的活跃中心。尽管它的覆盖面和影响力,但很少有纵向研究调查泡沫内容和参与模式是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。在这项研究中,我们旨在分析#发泡推文在五年内的主题变化和用户交互趋势。方法:我们对2020年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间发布的6000条标记为# foam的高参与英语推文进行了回顾性文献计量学和自然语言处理(NLP)研究。每个月,100条推文都是从Twitter的“热门”标签中挑选出来的,并经过人工整理。我们使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)来识别主题聚类。使用描述性统计和线性回归评估标签使用和参与指标。结果:我们通过LDA模型确定了10个不同的主题:护理点超声(POCUS)教育;神经-放射学,心脏科-心电图;肾脏学;重症监护病房;超声波;送往医院之前的/政策;网络研讨会和学习;复苏的场景;儿科成像;医学生教育;以及重症监护和出版物。话题流行率随着时间的推移而变化:早期的推文关注于COVID-19和重症监护,而后来的几年则越来越关注院前护理、诊断和POCUS。平均推文参与度在2023年达到顶峰(236.9±914.6)。值得注意的是,#POCUS和#MedEd等标签的使用率和参与度都有大幅增长,#MedEd的平均参与度最高达到287.7。相比之下,2019冠状病毒病的推文频率(从2020年的126条降至2023年的6条)和参与度(平均:67.1→18.5)都在稳步下降。Spearman相关分析显示,话题标签数与用户粘性有微弱但有统计学意义的相关性(ρ = 0.047, P < .001),这表明内容质量,而不是数量,是可见性的主要驱动因素。结论:Twitter/X上的泡沫话语仍然是动态的,对临床优先事项做出反应,并受到同伴互动的影响。自然语言处理和主题建模是揭示数字医学教育纵向趋势的宝贵工具,加强了Twitter/X在非正式实时学习社区中的作用。
{"title":"Mapping Five Years of #FOAMed: Trends, Engagement, and Shifting Topics on Twitter/X.","authors":"Ertuğ Günsoy, Ahmet Aykut, Cem Yildirim, Mehmet Veysel Öncül","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47392","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAMed) has emerged as a prominent component of online medical communication, with X (formerly Twitter) serving as an active hub for professional exchange among clinicians. Despite its reach and influence, few longitudinal studies have examined how FOAMed content and engagement patterns evolve over time. In this study we aimed to analyze thematic shifts and user interaction trends in #FOAMed tweets over a five-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective bibliometric and natural language processing (NLP) study of 6,000 high-engagement, English-language tweets tagged with #FOAMed, posted between January 1, 2020-December 31, 2024. Each month, the 100 tweets were selected from Twitter's \"Top\" tab and manually curated. We used latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify thematic clusters. Hashtag usage and engagement metrics were assessed using descriptive statistics and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10 distinct topics were identified through LDA modeling: point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education; neuro-radiology, cardiology-electrocardiogram (ECG); nephrology; and intensive care unit; ultrasound; prehospital/policy; webinars and learning; resuscitation scenarios; pediatric imaging; medical student education; and critical care and publications. Topic prevalence shifted over time: Early tweets focused on COVID-19 and critical care, while later years showed increasing attention to prehospital care, diagnostics, and POCUS. Mean tweet engagement peaked in 2023 (236.9 ± 914.6). Notably, hashtags such as #POCUS and #MedEd showed substantial increases in both usage and engagement, with #MedEd reaching a peak mean engagement of 287.7. In contrast, COVID-19 declined steadily, both in frequency (from 126 tweets in 2020 to just six in 2023) and in engagement (mean: 67.1 → 18.5). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that hashtag count had a weak but statistically significant correlation with engagement (ρ = 0.047, P < .001), suggesting that content quality, rather than volume, was the primary driver of visibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FOAMed discourse on Twitter/X remains dynamic, responsive to clinical priorities and shaped by peer interaction. Natural language processing and topic modeling are valuable tools to uncover longitudinal trends in digital medical education, reinforcing Twitter/X's role in informal, real-time learning communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146004135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leandro de Lorenco-Lima, Bradley Donohue, Dave MacIntyre, Christopher Fisher, Sheri Stucke, Todd Hightower, Jeremy Hertza, Nicole Waters, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Suzanne Roozendaal
Introduction: Mass shooting incidents (MSI) are single events injuring four or more victims, and they occur in the United States on average every 12.5 days. Studies have examined the psychological impact of MSIs on witnesses and surviving victims. However, the mental health of healthcare workers involved in the care of MSI victims requires further examination. We explored the association between work-related stress and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in healthcare workers involved in the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.
Methods: Surveys were distributed to 170 healthcare workers involved in the care of victims of the largest MSI in US history, the 2017 Las Vegas Route 91 Harvest Festival (58 people killed, 413 wounded bv gunshot or shrapnel). Fifty healthcare workers (29.4% response rate; 68% female), 29-71 years of age, responded to demographic questions followed by the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PTSD Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Ed, and the Health & Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool, between October 15, 2022-March 15, 2023.
Results: Results showed that work-related stress was significantly associated with symptoms of depression (BDI-II: P < .001, 22.9% variance; PHQ-9: P < .05, 20.5% variance) and PTSD (P < .001, 26.8% variance). No significant differences in symptom severity (work-related stress, anxiety, depression, and PTSD) were found between participants involved in critical care and non-critical care (P > .05). In addition, healthcare workers reported higher symptoms of depression (5.18 vs 2.91, P < .001), and lower symptoms of anxiety (8.84 vs 22.35, P < .05) than normative data of the general population.
Conclusion: Healthcare workers reporting a higher risk of work-related stress were more likely to report more symptoms of depression and PTSD. Healthcare workers involved in critical and non-critical care reported similar symptoms of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and work-related stress. Moreover, healthcare workers involved in the care of the Las Vegas mass shooting victims were more likely to report more symptoms of depression and fewer symptoms of anxiety than samples of the general population. Given the novelty of this study, the unpredictability of MSIs, and the current limitations, we offer recommendations for future studies.
简介:大规模枪击事件(MSI)是造成4人或4人以上伤亡的单一事件,在美国平均每12.5天发生一次。研究调查了msi对证人和幸存受害者的心理影响。然而,参与照顾MSI受害者的保健工作者的心理健康状况需要进一步检查。我们探讨了与2017年拉斯维加斯大规模枪击案有关的医护人员的工作压力与抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状之间的关系。方法:对参与美国历史上最大的MSI(2017年拉斯维加斯91号公路丰收节)受害者护理的170名医护人员进行调查(枪击或弹片造成58人死亡,413人受伤)。研究对象为50名29-71岁的卫生保健工作者(回复率29.4%,女性68%),于2020年10月15日至2023年3月15日期间,对人口统计学问题进行了问卷调查,随后采用贝克焦虑量表、贝克抑郁量表- ii (BDI-II)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版PTSD检查表和健康与安全执行管理标准指标工具进行了问卷调查。结果:工作压力与抑郁症(BDI-II: P < 0.001,方差为22.9%;PHQ-9: P < 0.05,方差为20.5%)和PTSD (P < 0.001,方差为26.8%)显著相关。在症状严重程度(工作压力、焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍)方面,在重症监护和非重症监护的参与者之间没有发现显著差异(P < 0.05)。此外,与普通人群相比,医护人员报告的抑郁症状(5.18比2.91,P < 0.001)更高,焦虑症状(8.84比22.35,P < 0.05)更低。结论:报告较高工作压力风险的医护人员更有可能报告更多的抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状。参与重症和非重症护理的医护人员报告了类似的焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍和工作压力症状。此外,与普通人群相比,参与照顾拉斯维加斯大规模枪击案受害者的医护人员更有可能报告更多的抑郁症状和更少的焦虑症状。鉴于本研究的新颖性、msi的不可预测性以及当前的局限性,我们对未来的研究提出了建议。
{"title":"Assessment of Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Involved in Care of Victims of the 2017 Las Vegas Mass Shooting.","authors":"Leandro de Lorenco-Lima, Bradley Donohue, Dave MacIntyre, Christopher Fisher, Sheri Stucke, Todd Hightower, Jeremy Hertza, Nicole Waters, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Suzanne Roozendaal","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47216","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mass shooting incidents (MSI) are single events injuring four or more victims, and they occur in the United States on average every 12.5 days. Studies have examined the psychological impact of MSIs on witnesses and surviving victims. However, the mental health of healthcare workers involved in the care of MSI victims requires further examination. We explored the association between work-related stress and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in healthcare workers involved in the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were distributed to 170 healthcare workers involved in the care of victims of the largest MSI in US history, the 2017 Las Vegas Route 91 Harvest Festival (58 people killed, 413 wounded bv gunshot or shrapnel). Fifty healthcare workers (29.4% response rate; 68% female), 29-71 years of age, responded to demographic questions followed by the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PTSD Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5<sup>th</sup> Ed, and the Health & Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool, between October 15, 2022-March 15, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that work-related stress was significantly associated with symptoms of depression (BDI-II: P < .001, 22.9% variance; PHQ-9: P < .05, 20.5% variance) and PTSD (P < .001, 26.8% variance). No significant differences in symptom severity (work-related stress, anxiety, depression, and PTSD) were found between participants involved in critical care and non-critical care (P > .05). In addition, healthcare workers reported higher symptoms of depression (5.18 vs 2.91, P < .001), and lower symptoms of anxiety (8.84 vs 22.35, P < .05) than normative data of the general population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare workers reporting a higher risk of work-related stress were more likely to report more symptoms of depression and PTSD. Healthcare workers involved in critical and non-critical care reported similar symptoms of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and work-related stress. Moreover, healthcare workers involved in the care of the Las Vegas mass shooting victims were more likely to report more symptoms of depression and fewer symptoms of anxiety than samples of the general population. Given the novelty of this study, the unpredictability of MSIs, and the current limitations, we offer recommendations for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Douglas Moss, Natalie Boorjian, Aidan Mullan, Sarayna S McGuire, John Anderson, Neha P Raukar
Introduction: Acute long bone fractures, such as femur and humerus fractures, frequently lead to emergency department (ED) visits and require timely pain management. However, disparities in analgesia administration persist across age and sex. This study investigates how these intersecting patient characteristics affect the timing and receipt of analgesia in both prehospital and ED settings.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥ 18 years of age) presenting to a Level I trauma center ED in 2022 with femur or humerus fractures. Demographics, analgesia timing, and receipt in both prehospital and ED settings were extracted from medical records. Our analysis included all forms of initial analgesic administration, including both narcotic and non-narcotic medications. We further categorized treatments to distinguish between any analgesia and narcotic analgesia. Multivariable Poisson and logistic regression models were used to assess disparities, adjusting for triage acuity, arrival method, initial pain score, and prehospital analgesia.
Results: Among 553 patients, 75% were ≥ 65 of age and 63% were female. Older adults experienced significantly longer delays to ED analgesia compared to younger adults (median 81 vs 44 minutes; +54.9% adjusted delay; P < .001) and were less likely to receive prehospital analgesia (44% vs 66%; odds ratio 2.52; P < .001). Sex-based disparities were also evident: females waited longer than males for ED analgesia (median 76 vs 57 minutes; +12.9% adjusted delay; P < .001). Among those who received prehospital analgesia, females waited 43% longer than males for subsequent ED pain treatment (median 72 vs 30 minutes; P <.001).
Conclusion: Age and sex disparities exist in both prehospital and ED pain management for long bone fractures. Older adults were less likely to receive prehospital analgesia and experienced prolonged delays in the ED. Female patients had longer ED wait times for analgesia, especially following prehospital treatment administered by emergency medical services responders.
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Disparities in Timing of Prehospital and Emergency Department Pain Management by Sex and Age.","authors":"Douglas Moss, Natalie Boorjian, Aidan Mullan, Sarayna S McGuire, John Anderson, Neha P Raukar","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47072","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute long bone fractures, such as femur and humerus fractures, frequently lead to emergency department (ED) visits and require timely pain management. However, disparities in analgesia administration persist across age and sex. This study investigates how these intersecting patient characteristics affect the timing and receipt of analgesia in both prehospital and ED settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥ 18 years of age) presenting to a Level I trauma center ED in 2022 with femur or humerus fractures. Demographics, analgesia timing, and receipt in both prehospital and ED settings were extracted from medical records. Our analysis included all forms of initial analgesic administration, including both narcotic and non-narcotic medications. We further categorized treatments to distinguish between any analgesia and narcotic analgesia. Multivariable Poisson and logistic regression models were used to assess disparities, adjusting for triage acuity, arrival method, initial pain score, and prehospital analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 553 patients, 75% were ≥ 65 of age and 63% were female. Older adults experienced significantly longer delays to ED analgesia compared to younger adults (median 81 vs 44 minutes; +54.9% adjusted delay; P < .001) and were less likely to receive prehospital analgesia (44% vs 66%; odds ratio 2.52; P < .001). Sex-based disparities were also evident: females waited longer than males for ED analgesia (median 76 vs 57 minutes; +12.9% adjusted delay; P < .001). Among those who received prehospital analgesia, females waited 43% longer than males for subsequent ED pain treatment (median 72 vs 30 minutes; P <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age and sex disparities exist in both prehospital and ED pain management for long bone fractures. Older adults were less likely to receive prehospital analgesia and experienced prolonged delays in the ED. Female patients had longer ED wait times for analgesia, especially following prehospital treatment administered by emergency medical services responders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146004221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Max Griffith, Alexander Garrett, Bjorn K Watsjold, Joshua Jauregui, Mallory Davis, Jonathan S Ilgen
Introduction: As emergency medicine (EM) residents prepare for the transition into unsupervised practice, their focus shifts from demonstrating competencies within familiar training environments to anticipating their new roles and responsibilities as attending physicians, often in unfamiliar settings. Using the self-regulated learning framework, we explored how senior EM residents proactively identify goals and enact learning strategies leading up to the transition from residency into unsupervised practice.
Methods: In this study we used a constructivist grounded theory approach, interviewing EM residents in their final year of training at two residency programs. Using the self-regulated learning framework as a sensitizing concept for analysis, we conducted inductive, line-by-line coding of interview transcripts and grouped codes into categories. Theoretical sufficiency was reached after 12 interviews, with four subsequent interviews producing no divergent or disconfirming examples.
Results: We interviewed16 senior residents about their self-regulated learning approaches to preparing for unsupervised practice. Participants identified two types of gaps that they sought to address prior to entering practice: knowledge/skill gaps, and autonomy gaps. We employed specific workplace learning strategies to address each type of gap, which we have termed cherry-picking, case-based hypotheticals, parachuting, and making the call, and reflection on both internal and external sources of feedback to assess the effectiveness of these learning strategies. This study presents participants' identification of gaps in their residency training, their learning strategies, and reflections as cyclical processes of self-regulated learning.
Conclusion: In their final months of training EM residents strategically leverage learning strategies to bridge gaps between their self-assessed capabilities and those they anticipate needing to succeed in unsupervised practice. These findings show that trainees have agency in how they use goal setting, strategic actions, and ongoing reflection to prepare themselves for unsupervised practice. Our findings also suggest tailored approaches whereby programs can support learning experiences that foster senior residents' agency when preparing for the challenges of future practice.
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Senior Residents' Strategies to Prepare for Unsupervised Practice.","authors":"Max Griffith, Alexander Garrett, Bjorn K Watsjold, Joshua Jauregui, Mallory Davis, Jonathan S Ilgen","doi":"10.5811/westjem.48914","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.48914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As emergency medicine (EM) residents prepare for the transition into unsupervised practice, their focus shifts from demonstrating competencies within familiar training environments to anticipating their new roles and responsibilities as attending physicians, often in unfamiliar settings. Using the self-regulated learning framework, we explored how senior EM residents proactively identify goals and enact learning strategies leading up to the transition from residency into unsupervised practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study we used a constructivist grounded theory approach, interviewing EM residents in their final year of training at two residency programs. Using the self-regulated learning framework as a sensitizing concept for analysis, we conducted inductive, line-by-line coding of interview transcripts and grouped codes into categories. Theoretical sufficiency was reached after 12 interviews, with four subsequent interviews producing no divergent or disconfirming examples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed16 senior residents about their self-regulated learning approaches to preparing for unsupervised practice. Participants identified two types of gaps that they sought to address prior to entering practice: knowledge/skill gaps, and autonomy gaps. We employed specific workplace learning strategies to address each type of gap, which we have termed cherry-picking, case-based hypotheticals, parachuting, and making the call, and reflection on both internal and external sources of feedback to assess the effectiveness of these learning strategies. This study presents participants' identification of gaps in their residency training, their learning strategies, and reflections as cyclical processes of self-regulated learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In their final months of training EM residents strategically leverage learning strategies to bridge gaps between their self-assessed capabilities and those they anticipate needing to succeed in unsupervised practice. These findings show that trainees have agency in how they use goal setting, strategic actions, and ongoing reflection to prepare themselves for unsupervised practice. Our findings also suggest tailored approaches whereby programs can support learning experiences that foster senior residents' agency when preparing for the challenges of future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1510-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698158/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Catherine A Marco, Lena Becker, Matthew Egner, Quincy Erturk, Ayush Sharma, Taylor Vail, Caroline Soderman, Nathan Morrison, Stephen Sandelich
Introduction: Many states have legalized the use of cannabis for medical or recreational purposes. Cannabis is commonly used both recreationally and medicinally, with therapeutic applications for conditions including chronic pain, seizure disorders, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, and depression. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency department (ED) patient knowledge of the short- and long-term effects of cannabis between users and non-users, and to understand perspectives and knowledge of cannabis use, to assist in development of public health interventions.
Methods: We conducted this prospective survey study at Penn State Health - Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Inclusion criteria included adult ED patients, ≥ 18 years of age, who had used cannabis in the most recent 30 days, between May to August 2024. The control group consisted of adult ED patients, ≥ 18 years of age, who had not used cannabis in the most recent 30 days. We conducted thematic analysis to identify subjects' knowledge of positive and negative effects of cannabis use.
Results: Of 258 eligible subjects, 169 consented to participate (65.5%). Most identified as female (54.4%) and White (68.1%), with a mean age of 40 years. Most participants reported cannabis use in their lifetime (75.7%). Participants reported a myriad of reasons for using cannabis, including to treat anxiety (N = 67; 40%); pain (N = 65; 38%); recreational use (N = 62; 37%); sleep (N = 48; 28%); and depression (N = 34; 20%). Commonly perceived positive effects of cannabis use included relaxation (18%), pain relief (16%), and improved mental health symptoms (13%). Commonly perceived negative effects of cannabis use included cognitive impairment (11%), addictive potential (7%), pulmonary effects (8%), and worsened mental health symptoms (6%). Cannabis users were less likely to correctly identify negative short-term and long-term consequences of cannabis use, compared to non-users. Cannabis users scored mean 2.51/5 (95% CI 2.11-2.92) for correctness of negative short-term effects, compared to 3.28/5 (95% CI 2.96-3.6) for non-users (P = .004). Cannabis users scored mean 1.78/5 (95% CI 1.44-2.12) for correctness of negative long-term effects, compared to 2.38/5 (95% CI 2-2.76) for non-users (P = .002).
Conclusion: Among ED patients who reported using cannabis, reasons cited for its use included recreation, anxiety, pain, depression, and sleep. Emergency department patients had significant knowledge gaps regarding the effects of cannabis use, and these knowledge gaps were higher among cannabis users. Cannabis users were less likely to correctly identify negative short-term and long-term consequences of cannabis use, compared to non-users.
导言:许多州已将用于医疗或娱乐目的的大麻使用合法化。大麻通常用于娱乐和药用,用于治疗慢性疼痛、癫痫、多发性硬化症、焦虑和抑郁等疾病。本研究的目的是比较急诊科患者对大麻使用者和非使用者之间的短期和长期影响的了解,并了解大麻使用的观点和知识,以协助制定公共卫生干预措施。方法:我们在宾夕法尼亚州立健康-米尔顿·s·好时医疗中心进行了这项前瞻性调查研究。纳入标准包括成人ED患者,年龄≥18岁,在最近30天内使用过大麻,在2024年5月至8月。对照组为成人ED患者,年龄≥18岁,最近30天未使用大麻。我们进行了专题分析,以确定受试者对大麻使用的积极和消极影响的认识。结果:258名符合条件的受试者中,169人同意参与(65.5%)。多数为女性(54.4%)和白人(68.1%),平均年龄40岁。大多数参与者报告在其一生中使用大麻(75.7%)。参与者报告了使用大麻的无数原因,包括治疗焦虑(N = 67; 40%);疼痛(N = 65; 38%);娱乐性用药(N = 62; 37%);睡眠(N = 48; 28%);抑郁(N = 34; 20%)。人们普遍认为使用大麻的积极作用包括放松(18%)、缓解疼痛(16%)和改善精神健康症状(13%)。人们普遍认为使用大麻的负面影响包括认知障碍(11%)、潜在成瘾(7%)、肺部影响(8%)和精神健康症状恶化(6%)。与非使用者相比,大麻使用者不太可能正确识别大麻使用的短期和长期负面后果。大麻使用者对短期负面影响的正确性的平均得分为2.51/5 (95% CI 2.11-2.92),而非使用者的平均得分为3.28/5 (95% CI 2.96-3.6) (P = 0.004)。大麻使用者对长期负面影响的正确性平均得分为1.78/5 (95% CI 1.44-2.12),而非使用者的平均得分为2.38/5 (95% CI 2-2.76) (P = 0.002)。结论:在报告使用大麻的ED患者中,使用大麻的原因包括娱乐、焦虑、疼痛、抑郁和睡眠。急诊病人对大麻使用的影响存在显著的知识差距,大麻使用者的知识差距更大。与非使用者相比,大麻使用者不太可能正确识别大麻使用的短期和长期负面后果。
{"title":"Comparison of Perspectives on Cannabis Use Between Emergency Department Patients Who Are Users and Non-users.","authors":"Catherine A Marco, Lena Becker, Matthew Egner, Quincy Erturk, Ayush Sharma, Taylor Vail, Caroline Soderman, Nathan Morrison, Stephen Sandelich","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47368","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many states have legalized the use of cannabis for medical or recreational purposes. Cannabis is commonly used both recreationally and medicinally, with therapeutic applications for conditions including chronic pain, seizure disorders, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, and depression. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency department (ED) patient knowledge of the short- and long-term effects of cannabis between users and non-users, and to understand perspectives and knowledge of cannabis use, to assist in development of public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this prospective survey study at Penn State Health - Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Inclusion criteria included adult ED patients, ≥ 18 years of age, who had used cannabis in the most recent 30 days, between May to August 2024. The control group consisted of adult ED patients, ≥ 18 years of age, who had not used cannabis in the most recent 30 days. We conducted thematic analysis to identify subjects' knowledge of positive and negative effects of cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 258 eligible subjects, 169 consented to participate (65.5%). Most identified as female (54.4%) and White (68.1%), with a mean age of 40 years. Most participants reported cannabis use in their lifetime (75.7%). Participants reported a myriad of reasons for using cannabis, including to treat anxiety (N = 67; 40%); pain (N = 65; 38%); recreational use (N = 62; 37%); sleep (N = 48; 28%); and depression (N = 34; 20%). Commonly perceived positive effects of cannabis use included relaxation (18%), pain relief (16%), and improved mental health symptoms (13%). Commonly perceived negative effects of cannabis use included cognitive impairment (11%), addictive potential (7%), pulmonary effects (8%), and worsened mental health symptoms (6%). Cannabis users were less likely to correctly identify negative short-term and long-term consequences of cannabis use, compared to non-users. Cannabis users scored mean 2.51/5 (95% CI 2.11-2.92) for correctness of negative short-term effects, compared to 3.28/5 (95% CI 2.96-3.6) for non-users (P = .004). Cannabis users scored mean 1.78/5 (95% CI 1.44-2.12) for correctness of negative long-term effects, compared to 2.38/5 (95% CI 2-2.76) for non-users (P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among ED patients who reported using cannabis, reasons cited for its use included recreation, anxiety, pain, depression, and sleep. Emergency department patients had significant knowledge gaps regarding the effects of cannabis use, and these knowledge gaps were higher among cannabis users. Cannabis users were less likely to correctly identify negative short-term and long-term consequences of cannabis use, compared to non-users.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1598-1604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698149/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Residents and medical students spend thousands of hours of medical education learning the physician's perspective but rarely find themselves on the other side of the stethoscope. In this study we evaluated whether a brief, novel curriculum of simulating the patient experience could improve medical learners' reported empathy for patients and ability to explain medical interventions.
Curricular design: Fifty-eight medical learners (medical students and resident physicians) participated in a 50-minute didactic session where learners simulated patient experiences such as wearing a patient gown and cervical collar, walking with crutches, and tasting potassium chloride and thickened water. Learners evaluated their perceptions of the curriculum with a survey.
Impact/effectiveness: Participants reported limited experience as patients, with 66.7% never having been hospitalized and 50% not taking any daily medications. Learners rated the curriculum highly on a seven-point Likert scale with 98% expressing it helped them to empathize with patients (90% either agreed or strongly agreed) and 95% expressing that it would help them explain interventions (81% either agreed or strongly agreed). There was no difference between medical students and residents regarding reported effect on empathy (M 6.24 vs 6.44; P = .30) or effect on ability to explain the intervention (M 6.06 vs 6.24; P = .43). This brief curriculum simulating the patient experience was well-received by medical student and resident learners, who overwhelmingly felt it improved their empathy for patients and explanations of common interventions. This approach to fostering empathy could help both medical student and resident learners, many of whom may have limited experience as a patient.
住院医师和医学生花费数千小时的医学教育来学习医生的观点,但很少发现自己站在听诊器的另一边。在这项研究中,我们评估了一个简短的、新颖的模拟病人体验的课程是否可以提高医学学习者对病人的同理心和解释医疗干预的能力。课程设计:58名医学学习者(医学院学生和住院医师)参加了一个50分钟的教学课程,在这个课程中,学习者模拟病人的经历,如穿着病人的长袍和颈圈,拄着拐杖走路,品尝氯化钾和加厚水。学生通过调查来评价他们对课程的看法。影响/有效性:参与者报告作为患者的经验有限,66.7%的人从未住院,50%的人不服用任何日常药物。学习者在7分李克特量表上对课程进行了高度评价,98%的人表示它帮助他们同情患者(90%同意或强烈同意),95%的人表示它将帮助他们解释干预措施(81%同意或强烈同意)。医学生和住院医师在共情方面的影响(均值6.24 vs 6.44; P = 0.30)或解释干预能力方面的影响(均值6.06 vs 6.24; P = 0.43)没有差异。这个简短的模拟病人经历的课程受到医学生和住院医师学习者的欢迎,他们绝大多数认为它提高了他们对病人的同情和对常见干预措施的解释。这种培养同理心的方法对医学生和住院医师学习者都有帮助,他们中的许多人作为病人的经验可能有限。
{"title":"A Taste of Our Own Medicine: Fostering Empathy in Medical Learners Through Patient Simulation.","authors":"Romy Portieles Peña, William Weber","doi":"10.5811/westjem.48535","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.48535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Residents and medical students spend thousands of hours of medical education learning the physician's perspective but rarely find themselves on the other side of the stethoscope. In this study we evaluated whether a brief, novel curriculum of simulating the patient experience could improve medical learners' reported empathy for patients and ability to explain medical interventions.</p><p><strong>Curricular design: </strong>Fifty-eight medical learners (medical students and resident physicians) participated in a 50-minute didactic session where learners simulated patient experiences such as wearing a patient gown and cervical collar, walking with crutches, and tasting potassium chloride and thickened water. Learners evaluated their perceptions of the curriculum with a survey.</p><p><strong>Impact/effectiveness: </strong>Participants reported limited experience as patients, with 66.7% never having been hospitalized and 50% not taking any daily medications. Learners rated the curriculum highly on a seven-point Likert scale with 98% expressing it helped them to empathize with patients (90% either agreed or strongly agreed) and 95% expressing that it would help them explain interventions (81% either agreed or strongly agreed). There was no difference between medical students and residents regarding reported effect on empathy (M 6.24 vs 6.44; P = .30) or effect on ability to explain the intervention (M 6.06 vs 6.24; P = .43). This brief curriculum simulating the patient experience was well-received by medical student and resident learners, who overwhelmingly felt it improved their empathy for patients and explanations of common interventions. This approach to fostering empathy could help both medical student and resident learners, many of whom may have limited experience as a patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1526-1529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeongmin Moon, Seonji Kim, Daesung Lim, Ho Kyung Sung, Nami Lee, Kyung-Shin Lee
Introduction: Delirium is a critical neuropsychiatric condition that surged among older adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, likely due to social isolation resulting from distancing measures. In this study we examined trends in delirium-related emergency department (ED) visits before and during the pandemic using nationwide data from South Korea, with a focus on different phases of social distancing, to inform healthcare strategies for older adults during public health crises.
Methods: We obtained data from the National Emergency Department Information System (2017-2022). Changes in ED visits were assessed across pre-pandemic (January 2017-January 2020), early pandemic (February 2020-March 2022), and late pandemic (April 2022-December 2022) phases using interrupted time series analysis.
Results: A total of 80,442 delirium-related ED visits among adults ≥ 65 years of age were recorded. The interrupted time series analysis showed a significant step increase in ED visits during the early pandemic phase (relative risk [RR] 1.290, 95% CI 1.201-1.386; 29.0% increase), followed by a decrease in the late pandemic phase (RR 0.922, 95% CI 0.868-0.981; 7.8% decrease). The most substantial increase was for individuals 65-74 year of age during the early pandemic period (RR 1.406, 95% CI 1.264-1.564) reflecting a 40.6% increase in visits to the ED. Indirect ED visits, such as institutional referrals, also notably increased (RR 1.275, 95% CI 1.184-1.373) reflecting a 27.5% increase.
Conclusion: Delirium-related ED visits among older adults showed a notable 7.8% decrease during the late pandemic period, with key risk groups identified, particularly adults 65-74 of age (40.6% increase) and those referred from institutions (27.5% increase) during the early pandemic period. These findings may help inform targeted interventions and public health responses in similar healthcare settings. Despite limitations including reliance on diagnostic codes, lack of subgroup analysis by COVID-19 status, potential duplicate visit counts, and limited regional granularity this study offers important insight into delirium care needs during crisis periods. Further research should further explore causal mechanisms and the specific impact of COVID-19 infection on delirium incidence.
导语:谵妄是一种严重的神经精神疾病,在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,老年人中出现激增,可能是由于隔离措施导致的社会隔离。在这项研究中,我们使用来自韩国的全国数据,研究了大流行之前和期间谵妄相关急诊科(ED)就诊的趋势,重点关注社会距离的不同阶段,为公共卫生危机期间老年人的医疗保健策略提供信息。方法:我们从国家急诊科信息系统(2017-2022)中获取数据。使用中断时间序列分析评估了大流行前(2017年1月至2020年1月)、大流行早期(2020年2月至2022年3月)和大流行晚期(2022年4月至2022年12月)阶段急诊科就诊的变化。结果:在≥65岁的成年人中,共记录了80,442例谵妄相关的ED就诊。中断时间序列分析显示,在大流行早期急诊科就诊显著增加(相对危险度[RR] 1.290, 95% CI 1.201-1.386;增加29.0%),随后在大流行后期减少(RR 0.922, 95% CI 0.868-0.981;减少7.8%)。在大流行早期,65-74岁的个体增幅最大(RR为1.406,95% CI为1.264-1.564),反映出急诊科就诊人数增加了40.6%。机构转诊等间接急诊科就诊人数也显著增加(RR为1.275,95% CI为1.184-1.373),反映出27.5%的增幅。结论:在大流行后期,老年人与谵妄相关的急诊科就诊人数显著下降了7.8%,并确定了关键风险群体,特别是65-74岁的成年人(增加40.6%)和大流行早期从机构转诊的成年人(增加27.5%)。这些发现可能有助于为类似卫生保健机构的针对性干预和公共卫生反应提供信息。尽管存在依赖诊断代码、缺乏按COVID-19状态进行的亚组分析、潜在的重复就诊次数和有限的区域粒度等局限性,但本研究为危机时期谵妄护理需求提供了重要见解。进一步的研究应进一步探讨COVID-19感染对谵妄发生率的因果机制和具体影响。
{"title":"Trends in Proportion of Delirium Among Older Emergency Department Patients in South Korea, 2017-2022.","authors":"Jeongmin Moon, Seonji Kim, Daesung Lim, Ho Kyung Sung, Nami Lee, Kyung-Shin Lee","doi":"10.5811/westjem.41507","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.41507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is a critical neuropsychiatric condition that surged among older adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, likely due to social isolation resulting from distancing measures. In this study we examined trends in delirium-related emergency department (ED) visits before and during the pandemic using nationwide data from South Korea, with a focus on different phases of social distancing, to inform healthcare strategies for older adults during public health crises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained data from the National Emergency Department Information System (2017-2022). Changes in ED visits were assessed across pre-pandemic (January 2017-January 2020), early pandemic (February 2020-March 2022), and late pandemic (April 2022-December 2022) phases using interrupted time series analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80,442 delirium-related ED visits among adults ≥ 65 years of age were recorded. The interrupted time series analysis showed a significant step increase in ED visits during the early pandemic phase (relative risk [RR] 1.290, 95% CI 1.201-1.386; 29.0% increase), followed by a decrease in the late pandemic phase (RR 0.922, 95% CI 0.868-0.981; 7.8% decrease). The most substantial increase was for individuals 65-74 year of age during the early pandemic period (RR 1.406, 95% CI 1.264-1.564) reflecting a 40.6% increase in visits to the ED. Indirect ED visits, such as institutional referrals, also notably increased (RR 1.275, 95% CI 1.184-1.373) reflecting a 27.5% increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delirium-related ED visits among older adults showed a notable 7.8% decrease during the late pandemic period, with key risk groups identified, particularly adults 65-74 of age (40.6% increase) and those referred from institutions (27.5% increase) during the early pandemic period. These findings may help inform targeted interventions and public health responses in similar healthcare settings. Despite limitations including reliance on diagnostic codes, lack of subgroup analysis by COVID-19 status, potential duplicate visit counts, and limited regional granularity this study offers important insight into delirium care needs during crisis periods. Further research should further explore causal mechanisms and the specific impact of COVID-19 infection on delirium incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1744-1754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
McKenna Straus, John M Morrison, Racha Khalaf, Jamie Fierstein, Alexandra Miller, Diana Young, Elliot Melendez
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fever as an indicator of infection is frequently used as an aid in triggering concern for sepsis in the emergency department (ED). Adults with sepsis presenting to the ED with a normal temperature have been shown to have delays in treatment and greater mortality. The association between temperature and timeliness of sepsis-related care in the ED remains poorly characterized in children. Our objective in this study was to measure the association between body temperature at the physiologic onset of sepsis and the time to initiation of antibiotic treatment and fluid bolus among children with clinically defined sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of pediatric patients with sepsis presenting to the ED. Data collected from an existing quality improvement database were supplemented via chart extraction. We assessed body temperature at physiologic onset of sepsis (PO-S), the date and time when a patient first met clinical criteria for sepsis as defined by Goldstein et al. Our primary outcomes were time from PO-S and administration of antibiotics and fluid bolus. Secondary outcomes included maximum vasoactive-inotropic scores, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 30 days of presentation, presence and type of organ dysfunction, 30-day hospital- and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, and mortality. We summarized and compared data by temperature group. Multivariable quantile regression was used to evaluate adjusted associations between body temperature and time to initiation of antibiotic treatment and fluid bolus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 928 patients screened, 385 (41%) met inclusion criteria. Median time to antibiotic treatment did not differ between temperature groups at PO-S-≤ 36.0 °C: median (IQR) 48.5, (41.3-104.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 95.5, (41.3-104.8;), and ≥ 38.0 °C: median 84, 45-151; (P = .24). Median time to fluid bolus administration also did not differ between temperature groups at PO-S-≤ 36.0 °C: median 39, (20.8-65.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 42.5 (21.3-86.3); and ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 54 (29-84); (P =.07). In addition, mortality differed by temperature at PO-S (≤ 36.0 °C: 1/22 (4.5%); 36.1-37.9 °C: 4/80 (5.0%); and ≥. 38.0 °C: 3/283 (1.1%), (P = .04); as did organ dysfunction at 72 hours: ≤. 36.0 °C: 15/22 (68.2%); 36.1-37.9 °C: 43/80 (53.8%), ≥ 38.0 °C: 74/283 (26.1%); (P < .001) and median (IQR) 30-day ICU- and hospital-free days-≤ 36.0 °C: median, 24, (20,-26.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 28 (24.8-30), ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 30 (27-30), (P < .001); and at ≤. 36.0°C: median, 22, (17-25); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 24 (17.8-27); ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 25 (20, 27), (P = .04), respectively. We did not observe an association between temperature and median time to antibiotic administration (β: 2.5, 95% CI, -4.2 to 9.1, P = .50) or first fluid bolus administration (β: 1.7, 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.8, P = .30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time to flui
{"title":"Triage Temperature and Timeliness of Sepsis Interventions in a Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"McKenna Straus, John M Morrison, Racha Khalaf, Jamie Fierstein, Alexandra Miller, Diana Young, Elliot Melendez","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47379","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fever as an indicator of infection is frequently used as an aid in triggering concern for sepsis in the emergency department (ED). Adults with sepsis presenting to the ED with a normal temperature have been shown to have delays in treatment and greater mortality. The association between temperature and timeliness of sepsis-related care in the ED remains poorly characterized in children. Our objective in this study was to measure the association between body temperature at the physiologic onset of sepsis and the time to initiation of antibiotic treatment and fluid bolus among children with clinically defined sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of pediatric patients with sepsis presenting to the ED. Data collected from an existing quality improvement database were supplemented via chart extraction. We assessed body temperature at physiologic onset of sepsis (PO-S), the date and time when a patient first met clinical criteria for sepsis as defined by Goldstein et al. Our primary outcomes were time from PO-S and administration of antibiotics and fluid bolus. Secondary outcomes included maximum vasoactive-inotropic scores, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 30 days of presentation, presence and type of organ dysfunction, 30-day hospital- and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, and mortality. We summarized and compared data by temperature group. Multivariable quantile regression was used to evaluate adjusted associations between body temperature and time to initiation of antibiotic treatment and fluid bolus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 928 patients screened, 385 (41%) met inclusion criteria. Median time to antibiotic treatment did not differ between temperature groups at PO-S-≤ 36.0 °C: median (IQR) 48.5, (41.3-104.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 95.5, (41.3-104.8;), and ≥ 38.0 °C: median 84, 45-151; (P = .24). Median time to fluid bolus administration also did not differ between temperature groups at PO-S-≤ 36.0 °C: median 39, (20.8-65.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 42.5 (21.3-86.3); and ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 54 (29-84); (P =.07). In addition, mortality differed by temperature at PO-S (≤ 36.0 °C: 1/22 (4.5%); 36.1-37.9 °C: 4/80 (5.0%); and ≥. 38.0 °C: 3/283 (1.1%), (P = .04); as did organ dysfunction at 72 hours: ≤. 36.0 °C: 15/22 (68.2%); 36.1-37.9 °C: 43/80 (53.8%), ≥ 38.0 °C: 74/283 (26.1%); (P < .001) and median (IQR) 30-day ICU- and hospital-free days-≤ 36.0 °C: median, 24, (20,-26.8); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 28 (24.8-30), ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 30 (27-30), (P < .001); and at ≤. 36.0°C: median, 22, (17-25); 36.1-37.9 °C: median, 24 (17.8-27); ≥ 38.0 °C: median, 25 (20, 27), (P = .04), respectively. We did not observe an association between temperature and median time to antibiotic administration (β: 2.5, 95% CI, -4.2 to 9.1, P = .50) or first fluid bolus administration (β: 1.7, 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.8, P = .30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time to flui","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1719-1728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698146/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Biliary tract disease is a frequent cause of abdominal pain among emergency department (ED) patients and accounts for a significant portion of hospital admissions and return visits. Our objective was to compare ED outcomes for patients ultimately diagnosed with biliary tract disease based on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) during their initial visit. We specifically analyzed patients admitted after an unscheduled return visit within 72 hours vs those admitted directly from the ED.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we used propensity score weighting and included 1,228 adults admitted for biliary tract disease, either during their initial ED visit (n = 1,120, 91.2%) or following an unscheduled return visit within 72 hours (n = 108, 8.8%) at a tertiary center in Taiwan between 2021-2023. Outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), costs, hospital LOS, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality. We used multivariable regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment to account for baseline differences.
Results: Initial discharge followed by admission after an unscheduled return visit was not associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to direct admission. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (0.93% vs 1.16%; odds ratio [OR] 0.59, P = .56) or ICU admission (0.93% vs 0.71%; OR 1.78, P = .61). While the initial ED LOS was shorter (mean: 4 hours vs 15.6 hours; regression-adjusted difference -6.66 hours, P < .001) and the initial ED costs were lower (mean: NT5477 vs NT$16,269, a 66% savings; regression-adjusted difference: -NT$6,548, P < .001), this reflects an expected early discharge. Among patients ultimately requiring admission after an unscheduled return visit, those who received POCUS at their index visit had a significantly shorter initial ED LOS (mean: 2.97 hours vs 4.78 hours; regression-adjusted difference -1.42 hours, P = .006) and lower initial ED costs (mean: NT$3,248 vs NT$7,149; a 55% saving; regression-adjusted difference -NT$3,271, P < .001) compared to those who did not. This initial POCUS use did not increase adverse events; only one of the 108 patients in the unscheduled return visit group required ICU admission (0.9%, 95% CI, 0.02-5.1%), and no deaths occurred (0%, 95% CI, 0-2.78%).
Conclusion: Initial discharge following ED assessment appears safe for many low-risk patients ultimately diagnosed with biliary tract disease on repeat visit within 72 hours. Incorporating POCUS during the initial evaluation may shorten ED LOS and reduce costs for patients who later require admission, without apparent measurable negative effects on mortality, hospital, or ICU length of stay.
导读:胆道疾病是急诊科(ED)患者腹痛的常见原因,在住院和复诊中占很大比例。我们的目的是比较首次就诊时使用即时超声(POCUS)最终诊断为胆道疾病的患者的ED结果。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用倾向评分加权法,纳入了1228名因胆道疾病入院的成年人,这些患者要么是在首次急诊期间(n = 1120, 91.2%),要么是在2021-2023年期间在台湾一家三级医疗中心进行了72小时内的非预定复诊(n = 108, 8.8%)。结果包括急诊科住院时间(LOS)、费用、医院住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和住院死亡率。我们使用多变量回归模型与处理加权调整的逆概率来解释基线差异。结果:与直接入院相比,初次出院后非预定复诊入院与更差的临床结果无关。两组住院死亡率(0.93% vs 1.16%;比值比[OR] 0.59, P = 0.56)和ICU住院率(0.93% vs 0.71%; OR 1.78, P = 0.61)无显著差异。虽然初始ED的住院时间较短(平均:4小时vs 15.6小时;经回归校正差值-6.66小时,P < 0.001),且初始ED费用较低(平均:新台币5477元vs新台币16,269元,节省66%;经回归校正差值:新台币6,548元,P < 0.001),这反映了预期的早期出院。在非预定复诊后最终需要入院的患者中,在首次复诊时接受POCUS的患者初始ED LOS(平均:2.97小时vs 4.78小时;回归校正差值-1.42小时,P = 0.006)显著缩短,初始ED费用(平均:新台币3,248元vs新台币7,149元;节省55%;回归校正差值-新台币3,271元,P < 0.001)低于未接受POCUS的患者。最初使用POCUS并未增加不良事件;非计划复诊组108例患者中只有1例需要ICU住院(0.9%,95% CI, 0.02-5.1%),无死亡发生(0%,95% CI, 0-2.78%)。结论:对于许多最终诊断为胆道疾病的低危患者,在72小时内重复就诊后,ED评估后的初次出院是安全的。在初始评估中纳入POCUS可缩短ED LOS并降低患者随后需要入院的费用,对死亡率、住院时间或ICU住院时间没有明显可测量的负面影响。
{"title":"Emergency Department Disposition and Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Biliary Disease: Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.","authors":"Yamato Eda, Po-Sheng Wu, Fen-Wei Huang, Sheng-Yao Hung, Ching-Ting Hsu, Wei-Kung Chen, Shih-Hao Wu","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47347","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biliary tract disease is a frequent cause of abdominal pain among emergency department (ED) patients and accounts for a significant portion of hospital admissions and return visits. Our objective was to compare ED outcomes for patients ultimately diagnosed with biliary tract disease based on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) during their initial visit. We specifically analyzed patients admitted after an unscheduled return visit within 72 hours vs those admitted directly from the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study we used propensity score weighting and included 1,228 adults admitted for biliary tract disease, either during their initial ED visit (n = 1,120, 91.2%) or following an unscheduled return visit within 72 hours (n = 108, 8.8%) at a tertiary center in Taiwan between 2021-2023. Outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), costs, hospital LOS, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality. We used multivariable regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment to account for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial discharge followed by admission after an unscheduled return visit was not associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to direct admission. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (0.93% vs 1.16%; odds ratio [OR] 0.59, P = .56) or ICU admission (0.93% vs 0.71%; OR 1.78, P = .61). While the initial ED LOS was shorter (mean: 4 hours vs 15.6 hours; regression-adjusted difference -6.66 hours, P < .001) and the initial ED costs were lower (mean: NT5477 vs NT$16,269, a 66% savings; regression-adjusted difference: -NT$6,548, P < .001), this reflects an expected early discharge. Among patients ultimately requiring admission after an unscheduled return visit, those who received POCUS at their index visit had a significantly shorter initial ED LOS (mean: 2.97 hours vs 4.78 hours; regression-adjusted difference -1.42 hours, P = .006) and lower initial ED costs (mean: NT$3,248 vs NT$7,149; a 55% saving; regression-adjusted difference -NT$3,271, P < .001) compared to those who did not. This initial POCUS use did not increase adverse events; only one of the 108 patients in the unscheduled return visit group required ICU admission (0.9%, 95% CI, 0.02-5.1%), and no deaths occurred (0%, 95% CI, 0-2.78%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial discharge following ED assessment appears safe for many low-risk patients ultimately diagnosed with biliary tract disease on repeat visit within 72 hours. Incorporating POCUS during the initial evaluation may shorten ED LOS and reduce costs for patients who later require admission, without apparent measurable negative effects on mortality, hospital, or ICU length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1564-1574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yosef Berlyand, Timmy Lin, Taylor D Marquis, Jared S Anderson, Daniel J Shanin, Alexis C Lawrence, Frank L Overly, David B Curley, Janette Baird, Anthony M Napoli
Introduction: We evaluated the relationship between inpatient boarding, measured as functional bed capacity, and left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates. Functional bed capacity is defined as the mean percentage of ED beds available for new and existing patients over a 24-hour period.
Methods: We performed quantile regression models examining the association between LWBS and terciles (low, medium, and high) of functional bed capacity, as well as median admit-to-departure times, controlling for other daily operational metrics. We additionally performed an encounter-level analysis to assess the relationship between functional bed capacity at the time of a patient's arrival and their likelihood of LWBS. Study sites included one academic, one community, and one pediatric ED in a single, urban medical system.
Results: Our study included 373,388 visits. In the adjusted regression at the daily level, low functional bed capacity was associated with an increase of 1.59% in LWBS compared to high functional bed capacity, which represented a 26.5% relative increase (about three patients) compared to median LWBS of 6.0% (P < .001). Larger daily census (+ 0.07% for each additional patient, P <.001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 15-patient increase in daily census from the median. Additionally, longer length of stay of discharged patients (+ 0.05% for each minute increase, P < .001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 20-minute increase in length of stay from the median. Weekdays relative to weekend days were associated with a 1.28% decrease in LWBS (P < .001) (approximately three fewer patients who left without being seen relative to the median LWBS of 6.0%). At the encounter level, functional bed capacity in the low and middle tercile was significantly associated with an increased probability of a patient LWBS (91% and 40% increases, respectively, P < .001). Of the patients who LWBS, 9.3% were high acuity, 59.5% medium acuity, and 31.2% low acuity.
Conclusion: Functional bed capacity is a new and pragmatic operational metric strongly associated with left-without-being-seen rates and provides an improved way to measure, study, and communicate the impact of inpatient boarding. We propose using functional bed capacity as a metric in future studies of ED operations. Additional studies that incorporate staffing levels to more accurately approximate functional bed capacity and better characterize its true impact on LWBS rates are needed.
{"title":"Reduced Functional Bed Capacity Due to Inpatient Boarding Is Associated with Increased Rates of Left Without Being Seen in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Yosef Berlyand, Timmy Lin, Taylor D Marquis, Jared S Anderson, Daniel J Shanin, Alexis C Lawrence, Frank L Overly, David B Curley, Janette Baird, Anthony M Napoli","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47312","DOIUrl":"10.5811/westjem.47312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We evaluated the relationship between inpatient boarding, measured as functional bed capacity, and left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates. Functional bed capacity is defined as the mean percentage of ED beds available for new and existing patients over a 24-hour period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed quantile regression models examining the association between LWBS and terciles (low, medium, and high) of functional bed capacity, as well as median admit-to-departure times, controlling for other daily operational metrics. We additionally performed an encounter-level analysis to assess the relationship between functional bed capacity at the time of a patient's arrival and their likelihood of LWBS. Study sites included one academic, one community, and one pediatric ED in a single, urban medical system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 373,388 visits. In the adjusted regression at the daily level, low functional bed capacity was associated with an increase of 1.59% in LWBS compared to high functional bed capacity, which represented a 26.5% relative increase (about three patients) compared to median LWBS of 6.0% (P < .001). Larger daily census (+ 0.07% for each additional patient, P <.001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 15-patient increase in daily census from the median. Additionally, longer length of stay of discharged patients (+ 0.05% for each minute increase, P < .001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 20-minute increase in length of stay from the median. Weekdays relative to weekend days were associated with a 1.28% decrease in LWBS (P < .001) (approximately three fewer patients who left without being seen relative to the median LWBS of 6.0%). At the encounter level, functional bed capacity in the low and middle tercile was significantly associated with an increased probability of a patient LWBS (91% and 40% increases, respectively, P < .001). Of the patients who LWBS, 9.3% were high acuity, 59.5% medium acuity, and 31.2% low acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional bed capacity is a new and pragmatic operational metric strongly associated with left-without-being-seen rates and provides an improved way to measure, study, and communicate the impact of inpatient boarding. We propose using functional bed capacity as a metric in future studies of ED operations. Additional studies that incorporate staffing levels to more accurately approximate functional bed capacity and better characterize its true impact on LWBS rates are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1648-1655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}