Western Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

Background: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience significant healthcare disparities. Clinicians are responsible for using and documenting their use of certified interpreters for patient encounters when appropriate. However, the data on interpreter use documentation in the emergency department (ED) is limited and variable. We sought to assess the effects of dot phrase and SmartPhrase implementation in an adult ED on the rates of documentation of interpreter use.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous survey asking emergency clinicians to self-report documentation of interpreter use. We also retrospectively reviewed documentation of interpreter- services use in ED charts at three time points: 1) pre-intervention baseline; 2) post-implementation of a clinician-driven dot phrase shortcut; and 3) post-implementation of a SmartPhrase.

Results: Most emergency clinicians reported using an interpreter "almost always" or "often." Our manual audit revealed that at baseline, interpreter use was documented in 35% of the initial clinician note, 4% of reassessments, and 0% of procedure notes; 52% of discharge instructions were written in the patients' preferred languages. After implementation of the dot phrase and SmartPhrase, respectively, rates of interpreter-use documentation improved to 43% and 97% of initial clinician notes, 9% and 6% of reassessments, and 5% and 35% of procedure notes, with 62% and 64% of discharge instructions written in the patients' preferred languages.

Conclusion: There was a discrepancy between reported rates of interpreter use and interpreter-use documentation rates. The latter increased with the implementation of a clinician-driven dot phrase and then a SmartPhrase built into the notes. Ensuring accurate documentation of interpreter use is an impactful step in language equity for LEP patients.

Background: Alteplase (tPA) is the initial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Current tPA guidelines exclude patients who took direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) within the prior 48 hours. In this propensity-matched retrospective study we compared acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA who had received DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis to those not previously treated with DOACs, regarding three outcomes: mortality; intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); and need for acute blood transfusions (as a marker of significant blood loss).

Methods: Using the United States cohort of 54 healthcare organizations in the TriNetx database, we identified 8,582 stroke patients treated with tPA on DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis and 46,703 stroke patients treated with tPA not on DOACs since January 1, 2012. We performed propensity score matching on demographic information and seven prior clinical diagnostic groups, resulting in a total of 17,164 acute stroke patients evenly matched between groups. We recorded mortality rates, frequency of ICH, and need for blood transfusions for each group over the ensuing 7- and 30-day periods.

Results: Patients treated with tPA on DOACs had reduced mortality (3.3% vs 7.3%; risk ratio [RR] 0.456; P < 0.001), fewer ICHs (6.8% vs 10.1%; RR 0.678; P < 0.001), and less risk of major bleeding as measured by frequency of blood transfusions (0.5% vs 1.5%; RR 0.317; p < 0.001) at 7 days post thrombolytic, than the tPA patients not on DOACS. Findings for 30 days post-thrombolytics were similar/statistically significant with lower mortality rate (7.2% vs 13.1%; RR 0.550; P < 0.001), fewer ICHs (7.6% vs 10.8%; RR 0.705; P < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (0.9% vs 2.0%; RR 0.448; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA who received DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis had lower mortality rates, reduced incidence of ICH, and less blood loss than those not on DOACs. Our study suggests that prior use of DOACs should not be a contraindication to thrombolysis for ischemic stroke.

Introduction: Photokeratoconjunctivitis (PKC) is primarily caused by welding. However, inappropriate use of germicidal lamps, which have been widely used following the COVID-19 outbreak, can also cause PKC. Our goal in this study was to investigate the incidence of and changes in the causes of PKC during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study. The health records of patients who visited the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital from January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021 and were diagnosed with PKC, were reviewed. We then conducted an analysis to compare the characteristics of PKC before and after COVID-19 began and the features of PKC caused by welding and germicidal lamps.

Results: There were 160 PKC cases with a clear etiology before the COVID-19 pandemic and 147 cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant differences in age and gender were detected between the two groups. The incidence of PKC induced by the use of germicidal lamps during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher (10.2%) than the incidence before the pandemic (3.1%). The ratio of females to males in the germicidal lamp subgroup was significantly higher than the ratio in the welding subgroup. Limitations included incomplete information due to the retrospective nature of the study, underestimation of incidence, and possible recall bias.

Conclusion: In the era of COVID-19, clinicians should be aware of the hazards of germicidal lamps. Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to show signs of easing, new infectious diseases that require protective measures could still emerge in the future. Therefore, injuries related to germicidal lamps deserve more public health attention.

Background: Patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for respiratory dysfunction. The pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO₂/FiO₂) ratio is a non-invasive assessment of respiratory dysfunction substituted for the PaO₂:FiO₂ ratio in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring. We hypothesized that emergency department (ED) SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios correlate with requirement for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Our objective was to identify COVID-19 patients at greatest risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, using SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 at two hospitals. Highest and lowest SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios (percent saturation/fraction of inspired O₂) were calculated on admission. We performed chi-square, univariate, and multiple regression analysis to evaluate the relationship of admission SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios with requirement for mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) care.

Results: A total of 539 patients (46% female; 84% White), with a mean age 67.6 ± 18.6 years, met inclusion criteria. Patients who required mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay were statistically younger in age (P = 0.001), had a higher body mass index (P < .001), and there was a higher percentage of patients who were obese (P = 0.03) and morbidly obese (P < .001). Shortness of breath, cough, and fever were the most common presenting symptoms with a median temperature of 99°F. Average white blood count was higher in patients who required ventilation (P = <0.001). A highest obtained ED SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for mechanical ventilation. A lowest obtained ED SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for intensive care unit care. There was no statistically significant correlation between ED SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios >300 and mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) requirement.

Conclusion: The ED SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios correlated with mechanical ventilation and ICU requirements during hospitalization for COVID-19. These results support ED SpO₂/FiO₂ as a possible triage tool and predictor of hospital resource requirements for patients admitted with COVID-19. Further investigation is warranted.

Introduction: The number and characteristics of pregnant patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) has not been well described. Our objective in this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pregnant patients presenting to EDs in the US between 2010-2020.

Methods: We completed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient encounters at hospital-based EDs in the US from 2010-2020. Using the ED subsample of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) we identified ED visits for female patients aged 15-44 years. We defined a subsample of these as visits for pregnant patients using discharge diagnosis codes specific to pregnancy. We compared this population of pregnant patient visits to those for non-pregnant patients and computed point estimates for nationally weighted values. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine factors independently associated with pregnant patient visits.

Results: The 2010-2020 NHAMCS dataset included 255,963 ED visits. Of these visits 59,080 were for female patients 15-44 years old, and 6,068 of those visits were for pregnant patients. Pregnant patients accounted for 3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-3.2) of all ED visits and 8.6% (95% CI 8-9.3) of all visits among female patients 15-44 years. Weighting to a national sample, this equates to 2.77 million pregnant patients presenting for ED visits annually. Pregnant patients were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, or to use public insurance.

Conclusion: Pregnant patients make up a significant number of ED visits annually and are more likely to be people of color or publicly insured. Interventions to address the effects of changing abortion legislation on emergency medicine practice may benefit from consideration that certain populations of pregnant people are more likely to present to the ED for care.

Introduction: Pediatric patients account for 6-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) activations in the United States. Approximately 30% of these children are not transported to an emergency department (ED). Adult data in the literature reports higher hospitalization and complications following non-transport. Few studies discuss epidemiology and characteristics of pediatric non-transport; however, data on outcome is limited. Our primary aim was to determine outcomes of non-transported children within our urban EMS system before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our secondary objective was to explore reasons for non-transport.

Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive pilot study. We compared EMS data for September 2019 (pre-COVID-19) to September 2020 (pandemic). Included were children aged 0-17 years who activated EMS and did not receive transport to the primary hospital for the EMS capture area. We defined outcomes as repeat EMS activation, ED visits, and hospital admissions, all within 72 hours. Data was obtained via electronic capture. We used descriptive statistics to analyze our data, chi square for categorical data, stepwise logistic regression, and univariate logistic regression to test for association of covariates with non-transport.

Results: There were 1,089 pediatric EMS activations in September 2019 and 780 in September 2020. Non-transport occurred in 633 (58%) in September 2019 and 412 (53%) in September 2020. Emergency medical services was reactivated within 72 hours in the following: 9/633 (1.4%) in 2019; and 5/412 (1.2%) in 2020 (P = 0.77). Visits to the ED occurred in 57/633 (9%) in 2019 and 42/412 (10%) in 2020 (P = 0.53). Hospital admissions occurred in 10/633 (1.5%) in 2019 and 4/412 (0.97%) in 2020 (P = 0.19). One non-transported patient was admitted to the intensive care unit in September 2020 (<1%) and survived. Hispanic ethnicity, age >12 years, and fever were associated with repeat EMS activation. The most common reason for non-transport in both study periods was that the parent felt an ambulance was not necessary (47%).

Conclusion: In our system, non-transport of pediatric patients occurred in >50% of EMS activations with no significant adverse outcome. Age >12 years, fever, and Hispanic ethnicity were more common in repeated EMS activations. The most common reason for non-transport was parents feeling it was not necessary. Future studies are needed to develop reliable EMS guidelines for pediatric non-transport.

Background: The evaluation of patients with first-trimester vaginal bleeding and concern for early pregnancy loss (EPL) frequently occurs in the emergency department (ED), accounting for approximately 1.6% of all ED visits.¹ Unfortunately, these patients consistently report negative experiences with ED care.^2-8 In addition to environmental concerns, such as long wait times, patients often describe negative interactions with staff, including a perceived lack of empathy, the use of insensitive language, and inadequate counseling.^2,3 These patients and their partners often view EPL as a traumatic loss of life and commonly experience prolonged grief reactions, including anxiety and depression.^9-11 Poor satisfaction with care has been associated with worse mental health outcomes.¹² These complaints represent an important opportunity for improvement in emergency medicine (EM) training.¹³ While no published literature to date describes the performance of EM residents in managing patients presenting with EPL, studies suggest that even obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents find these interactions challenging.^14,15 Simulation- and didactic-based training has been shown to be beneficial in improving OB/GYN resident EPL counseling and has been associated with improved patient outcomes.¹⁶ To our knowledge, this has yet to be replicated in EM residency training.

Objectives: We aimed to develop and evaluate a simulation-based educational intervention to improve EM resident management of patients presenting with EPL.

Purpose: Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to diagnose abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an essential skill in emergency medicine (EM). While simulation-based POCUS education is commonly used, the translation to performance in the emergency department (ED) is unknown. We investigated whether adding case-based simulation to an EM residency curriculum was associated with changes in the quantity and quality of aorta POCUS performed by residents in the ED.

Methods: A case-based simulation was introduced to resident didactics at our academic, Level I trauma center. A case of undifferentiated abdominal pain was presented, which required examination of an ultrasound phantom to diagnose an AAA, with a hands-on didactic. We compared the quantity, quality, and descriptive analyses of aorta POCUS performed in the ED during the four months before and after the simulation.

Results: For participating residents (17/32), there was an 86% increase in total studies and an 80% increase in clinical studies. On an opportunity-adjusted, per-resident basis, there was no significant difference in median total scans per 100 shifts (4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-15.8 vs 8.3 [IQR] 3.3-23.6, P = 0.21) or average total quality scores (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.5, P = 0.92). The total number of limited or inadequate studies decreased (43% vs 19%, P = 0.02), and the proportion of scans submitted by interns increased (7% vs 54%, P = < .001).

Conclusion: After simulation training, aorta POCUS was performed more frequently, and ED interns contributed a higher proportion of scans. While there was no improvement in quantity or quality scores on a per-resident basis, there were significantly fewer incomplete or limited scans.

Introduction: Learners frequently benefit from modalities such as small-group, case-based teaching and interactive didactic experiences rather than passive learning methods. These contemporary techniques are features of Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) curricula, and particularly the Foundations I (F1) course, which targets first-year resident (PGY-1) learners. The American Board of Emergency Medicine administers the in-training exam (ITE) that provides an annual assessment of EM-specific medical knowledge. We sought to assess the effect of F1 implementation on ITE scores.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from interns at four EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. We collected data in 2021. Participating sites were geographically diverse and included three- and four-year training formats. We collected data from interns two years before (control group) and two years after (intervention group) implementation of F1 at each site. Year of F1 implementation ranged from 2015-2018 at participating sites. We abstracted data using a standard form including program, ITE raw score, year of ITE administration, US Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 score, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score, and gender. We performed univariable and multivariable linear regression to explore differences between intervention and control groups.

Results: We collected data for 180 PGY-1s. Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores were significant predictors of ITE in univariable analyses (both with P < 0.001). After accounting for Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, we did not find F1 implementation to be a significant predictor of ITE score, P = 0.83.

Conclusion: Implementation of F1 curricula did not show significant changes in performance on the ITE after controlling for important variables.

Background: Despite the prevalence of sexual assault presentations to emergency departments (ED) in the United States, current access to sexual assault nurse examiners (SANE) and emergency contraception (EC) in EDs is unknown.

Methods: In this study we employed a "secret shopper," cross-sectional telephonic survey. A team attempted phone contact with a representative sample of EDs and asked respondents about the availability of SANEs and EC in their ED. Reported availability was correlated with variables including region, urban/rural status, hospital size, faith affiliation, academic affiliation, and existence of legislative requirements to offer EC.

Results: Over a two-month period in 2019, 1,046 calls to hospitals were attempted and 960 were completed (91.7% response rate). Of the 4,360 eligible hospitals listed in a federal database, 960 (22.0%) were contacted. Access to SANEs and EC were reported to be available in 48.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5-52.0) and 42.5% (95% CI 39.4-45.7) of hospitals, respectively. Access to EC was positively correlated with SANE availability. The EDs reporting SANE and EC availability were more likely to be large, rural, and affiliated with an academic institution. Those reporting access to EC were more likely to be in the Northeast and in states with legislative requirements to offer EC.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that perceived access to sexual assault services and emergency contraception in EDs in the United States remains poor with regional and legislative disparities. Results suggest disparities in perceived access to EC and SANE in the ED, which have implications for improving ED practices regarding care of sexual assault victims.