Background: SPIO is increasingly popular in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) because of its non-radioactive nature and logistical advantage. Previous studies have demonstrated non-inferiority of SPIO compared to conventional dual tracer technique in SLNBx for early breast cancers. Brown stain from SPIO raises esthetic concerns in breast conservative treatment (BCT). The aim of this study is to compare the staining outcomes of SPIO to conventional blue dye.
Method: This is a prospective study reporting the predefined secondary analysis of our previously conducted randomized controlled trial (Trial registration number NCT05288686). SPIO arm patients were given subareolar SPIO injections before operation, and control arm patients received blue dye and radioisotope injections. Patients receiving BCT were selected and assessed at follow-ups for skin stains up to 18-month postoperatively.
Results: One hundred and twelve patients and 113 SLNBx were included. Skin stains in both groups gradually decreased with time. SPIO group (61 SLNBx), as compared to control group (52 SLNBx), demonstrated larger incidence and size of skin stains throughout the study period (p < 0.001). The number of sentinel nodes (p = 0.03) and volume of lumpectomies (p = 0.034) were significantly correlated with skin stains at 18-month, that is, patients with more sentinel nodes harvested and larger volume of breast tissue resected have smaller stains by 18-month.
Conclusion: SPIO gives rise to higher incidence and larger skin stains compared to blue dye. Considerations should be given to cosmetic outcomes and shared decision-making be adopted whilst determining the optimal tracers in sentinel lymph node mapping.
Trial registration: The original randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05288686).
{"title":"Skin-Staining From Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) for Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling-Follow-Up Results From a Randomized Trial.","authors":"Hon-Yiu Chiu, Vivian Man, Dacita Suen, Ava Kwong","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SPIO is increasingly popular in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) because of its non-radioactive nature and logistical advantage. Previous studies have demonstrated non-inferiority of SPIO compared to conventional dual tracer technique in SLNBx for early breast cancers. Brown stain from SPIO raises esthetic concerns in breast conservative treatment (BCT). The aim of this study is to compare the staining outcomes of SPIO to conventional blue dye.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a prospective study reporting the predefined secondary analysis of our previously conducted randomized controlled trial (Trial registration number NCT05288686). SPIO arm patients were given subareolar SPIO injections before operation, and control arm patients received blue dye and radioisotope injections. Patients receiving BCT were selected and assessed at follow-ups for skin stains up to 18-month postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twelve patients and 113 SLNBx were included. Skin stains in both groups gradually decreased with time. SPIO group (61 SLNBx), as compared to control group (52 SLNBx), demonstrated larger incidence and size of skin stains throughout the study period (p < 0.001). The number of sentinel nodes (p = 0.03) and volume of lumpectomies (p = 0.034) were significantly correlated with skin stains at 18-month, that is, patients with more sentinel nodes harvested and larger volume of breast tissue resected have smaller stains by 18-month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPIO gives rise to higher incidence and larger skin stains compared to blue dye. Considerations should be given to cosmetic outcomes and shared decision-making be adopted whilst determining the optimal tracers in sentinel lymph node mapping.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The original randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05288686).</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sameh Hany Emile, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Marcus Oosenbrug, Victor Strassmann, Steven D Wexner
Background: Anal sphincteroplasty (AS) was considered standard treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) associated with sphincter injury; however, long-term outcomes have been disappointing. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has proven effective for FI secondary to anal sphincter defects. This review aimed to assess outcomes of SNM in FI associated with anal sphincter defects and to compare outcomes to AS.
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review inquired PubMed and Scopus through January 2025 for studies that assessed SNM in FI secondary to anal sphincter defects. The primary outcome was continence improvement and change in baseline incontinence scores; overall complications were the secondary outcome. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled outcomes and odds of continence improvement after SNM compared to AS.
Results: Ten studies incorporating 779 patients (93.9% female; median age 54.5 years) were included. SNM was performed in 503 (64.5%) and AS in 265 (34%) patients. The weighted mean reduction in incontinence scores after SNM was 8.53 points (95% CI: 6.11, 10.96, p < 0.001) and the pooled rate of continence improvement was 66.7% (95% CI: 52.2%-81.1%). Previous sphincteroplasty, external sphincter defects > 120°, and low resting anal pressure were significantly associated with less continence improvement. Pooled complication and device removal rates were 18.5% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.2%) and 9.1% (95% CI: 3.4%-14.7%), respectively. SNM was associated with better continence improvement than AS (OR: 1.68, p = 0.006) with similar odds of complications (OR: 0.73, p = 0.763).
Conclusions: SNM was associated with a good improvement in FI associated with anal sphincter defects. However, a longer follow-up is required to ascertain these mid-term outcomes. There are not enough data to date to draw solid conclusions regarding the comparison between SNM and sphincteroplasty in patients with sphincter lesions.
背景:肛门括约肌成形术(AS)被认为是治疗伴有括约肌损伤的大便失禁(FI)的标准治疗方法;然而,长期结果令人失望。骶神经调节(SNM)已被证明对继发于肛门括约肌缺陷的FI有效。本综述旨在评估伴有肛门括约肌缺损的FI患者SNM的预后,并将其与AS的预后进行比较。方法:一项符合prisma标准的系统评价查询了PubMed和Scopus到2025年1月评估继发于肛门括约肌缺陷的FI中SNM的研究。主要结局是尿失禁改善和基线尿失禁评分的变化;总体并发症是次要结果。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算与AS相比,SNM后尿失禁改善的合并结果和几率。结果:纳入10项研究,共纳入779例患者(93.9%为女性,中位年龄54.5岁)。SNM患者503例(64.5%),AS患者265例(34%)。SNM后尿失禁评分加权平均降低8.53分(95% CI: 6.11, 10.96, p 120°),静息肛门压低与尿失禁改善程度较低显著相关。合并并发症和器械取出率分别为18.5% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.2%)和9.1% (95% CI: 3.4%-14.7%)。SNM与AS相比有更好的尿失禁改善(OR: 1.68, p = 0.006),并发症发生率相似(OR: 0.73, p = 0.763)。结论:SNM与肛门括约肌缺损相关的FI有良好的改善。但是,需要更长的后续行动才能确定这些中期结果。迄今为止,没有足够的数据来得出关于SNM和括约肌成形术在括约肌病变患者中的比较的可靠结论。
{"title":"Efficacy of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence Associated With Anal Sphincter Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sameh Hany Emile, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Marcus Oosenbrug, Victor Strassmann, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anal sphincteroplasty (AS) was considered standard treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) associated with sphincter injury; however, long-term outcomes have been disappointing. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has proven effective for FI secondary to anal sphincter defects. This review aimed to assess outcomes of SNM in FI associated with anal sphincter defects and to compare outcomes to AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review inquired PubMed and Scopus through January 2025 for studies that assessed SNM in FI secondary to anal sphincter defects. The primary outcome was continence improvement and change in baseline incontinence scores; overall complications were the secondary outcome. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled outcomes and odds of continence improvement after SNM compared to AS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies incorporating 779 patients (93.9% female; median age 54.5 years) were included. SNM was performed in 503 (64.5%) and AS in 265 (34%) patients. The weighted mean reduction in incontinence scores after SNM was 8.53 points (95% CI: 6.11, 10.96, p < 0.001) and the pooled rate of continence improvement was 66.7% (95% CI: 52.2%-81.1%). Previous sphincteroplasty, external sphincter defects > 120°, and low resting anal pressure were significantly associated with less continence improvement. Pooled complication and device removal rates were 18.5% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.2%) and 9.1% (95% CI: 3.4%-14.7%), respectively. SNM was associated with better continence improvement than AS (OR: 1.68, p = 0.006) with similar odds of complications (OR: 0.73, p = 0.763).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNM was associated with a good improvement in FI associated with anal sphincter defects. However, a longer follow-up is required to ascertain these mid-term outcomes. There are not enough data to date to draw solid conclusions regarding the comparison between SNM and sphincteroplasty in patients with sphincter lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Safety and Early Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia in Octogenarians.","authors":"Junsheng Li","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70148","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Machine Learning for Trauma Severity Scoring: External Validity, Bias, and Explainability.","authors":"Carlos M Ardila, Daniel González-Arroyave","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70153","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maia R Nofal, Natnael Gebeyehu, Assefa Tesfaye, Habtamu Woldeamanuel, Senait Bitew Alemu, Sara Taye Haile, Tihitena Negussie Mammo, Thomas G Weiser
Introduction: Perioperative infection prevention and control (IPC) standards are known to reduce surgical site infections (SSI), but compliance is challenging. Clean Cut is a multimodal checklist-based quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with IPC standards. This study evaluates the impact of Clean Cut training workshops to improve IPC compliance when delivered as part of a bundled intervention.
Methods: From September 2021 to January 2023, nine Ethiopian hospitals received a bundled intervention that included educational workshops on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) and sterile reprocessing practices. Simultaneously, teams undertook a process mapping exercise of IPC standards to identify process gaps. We performed a time-series analysis to assess changes in compliance with the SSC, instrument, and linen reprocessing in the 4 months before and after the intervention. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of compliance and predicted the change in average weekly compliance.
Results: We observed 5821 operations, 2876 (49.4%) pre-intervention and 2946 (50.6%) post-intervention. Trends in SSC, instrument, and linen reprocessing compliance improved after the intervention. Average weekly SSC compliance improved 9.1% (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.002-1.188; p = 0.044) while compliance with instrument reprocessing improved 12.1% (IRR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.074-1.173; p < 0.001) and linen reprocessing 8.0% (IRR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.017-1.147; p = 0.013).
Discussion: Workshop delivery coupled with process mapping of infection prevention standards was effective in improving compliance with the SSC and sterile reprocessing as part of a bundled intervention to reduce SSI. Observed improvements that temporally follow this work provide evidence of the value of this intervention.
{"title":"Sterile Reprocessing and Surgical Safety Checklist Training to Improve Perioperative Infection Prevention in Ethiopia.","authors":"Maia R Nofal, Natnael Gebeyehu, Assefa Tesfaye, Habtamu Woldeamanuel, Senait Bitew Alemu, Sara Taye Haile, Tihitena Negussie Mammo, Thomas G Weiser","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perioperative infection prevention and control (IPC) standards are known to reduce surgical site infections (SSI), but compliance is challenging. Clean Cut is a multimodal checklist-based quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with IPC standards. This study evaluates the impact of Clean Cut training workshops to improve IPC compliance when delivered as part of a bundled intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2021 to January 2023, nine Ethiopian hospitals received a bundled intervention that included educational workshops on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) and sterile reprocessing practices. Simultaneously, teams undertook a process mapping exercise of IPC standards to identify process gaps. We performed a time-series analysis to assess changes in compliance with the SSC, instrument, and linen reprocessing in the 4 months before and after the intervention. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of compliance and predicted the change in average weekly compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 5821 operations, 2876 (49.4%) pre-intervention and 2946 (50.6%) post-intervention. Trends in SSC, instrument, and linen reprocessing compliance improved after the intervention. Average weekly SSC compliance improved 9.1% (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.002-1.188; p = 0.044) while compliance with instrument reprocessing improved 12.1% (IRR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.074-1.173; p < 0.001) and linen reprocessing 8.0% (IRR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.017-1.147; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Workshop delivery coupled with process mapping of infection prevention standards was effective in improving compliance with the SSC and sterile reprocessing as part of a bundled intervention to reduce SSI. Observed improvements that temporally follow this work provide evidence of the value of this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145565728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Outcomes of Civilian Penetrating Rectal Injuries Associated With Genitourinary and Bony Injuries.","authors":"Xin Jiang, Xiumei Yang, Miao Chen, Wenjun Meng","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70170","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145565749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daqi Zhang, Francesco Brucchi, Diego Barbieri, Pietro Indelicato, Carla Colombo, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Hui Sun
Background: The effect of topical intraoperative corticosteroid application on voice quality in thyroid surgery with preserved RLN remains unclear. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this intervention.
Methods: Between January 2023 and June 2024, 134 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were screened for eligibility. Patients who developed loss of signal (LOS) during surgery or who had postoperative impaired vocal cord motility on laryngoscopy were not included in the final analysis. Fourteen patients were excluded (six for previous thyroid/parathyroid surgery, four for preoperative vocal cord paralysis, and four for corticosteroid allergy), leaving 120 patients who were randomized equally to receive either topical intraoperative corticosteroids (n = 60) or standard treatment (n = 60). Baseline demographic and clinical data were comparable between the groups. Dynamic function of the larynx was monitored intraoperatively using electromyography (EMG), and vocal outcomes were assessed 1 week postoperatively using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). Laryngeal findings and adverse events were also recorded.
Results: No EMG signal was recognized in any patient. The EMG amplitudes and latencies of the vagus nerve (V1 and V2) did not differ significantly between the groups. EMG signal changes between V1 and V2 were observed in 16% of RLNs in the control group and in 18% in the corticosteroid group, but these were not associated with clinically significant decreases in amplitude or increases in latency. Postoperatively, the corticosteroid group had significantly lower (better) mean VHI scores (12.4 ± 3.2 vs. 19.6 ± 4.7; p < 0.01) and higher V-RQOL scores (88.3 ± 6.1 vs. 77.5 ± 8.8; p = 0.02) than the control group. The subgroup analysis of patients with EMG changes showed similar trends. Vocal fold edema occurred in 2 patients in the corticosteroid group and 5 in the control group, with complete resolution of stroboscopic abnormalities in all patients after 4 weeks. No local or systemic complications related to the use of corticosteroids were observed, and the postoperative courses were uneventful in both groups.
Conclusions: Topical intraoperative use of corticosteroids in thyroid surgery with preserved RLN is safe and associated with improved early postoperative voice outcomes. No significant adverse events were observed, and RLN function was preserved in all cases. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term clinical relevance of these results.
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Topical Intraoperative Corticosteroid Application on Voice Quality in Thyroid Surgery With Preserved Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves.","authors":"Daqi Zhang, Francesco Brucchi, Diego Barbieri, Pietro Indelicato, Carla Colombo, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Hui Sun","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of topical intraoperative corticosteroid application on voice quality in thyroid surgery with preserved RLN remains unclear. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2023 and June 2024, 134 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were screened for eligibility. Patients who developed loss of signal (LOS) during surgery or who had postoperative impaired vocal cord motility on laryngoscopy were not included in the final analysis. Fourteen patients were excluded (six for previous thyroid/parathyroid surgery, four for preoperative vocal cord paralysis, and four for corticosteroid allergy), leaving 120 patients who were randomized equally to receive either topical intraoperative corticosteroids (n = 60) or standard treatment (n = 60). Baseline demographic and clinical data were comparable between the groups. Dynamic function of the larynx was monitored intraoperatively using electromyography (EMG), and vocal outcomes were assessed 1 week postoperatively using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). Laryngeal findings and adverse events were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No EMG signal was recognized in any patient. The EMG amplitudes and latencies of the vagus nerve (V1 and V2) did not differ significantly between the groups. EMG signal changes between V1 and V2 were observed in 16% of RLNs in the control group and in 18% in the corticosteroid group, but these were not associated with clinically significant decreases in amplitude or increases in latency. Postoperatively, the corticosteroid group had significantly lower (better) mean VHI scores (12.4 ± 3.2 vs. 19.6 ± 4.7; p < 0.01) and higher V-RQOL scores (88.3 ± 6.1 vs. 77.5 ± 8.8; p = 0.02) than the control group. The subgroup analysis of patients with EMG changes showed similar trends. Vocal fold edema occurred in 2 patients in the corticosteroid group and 5 in the control group, with complete resolution of stroboscopic abnormalities in all patients after 4 weeks. No local or systemic complications related to the use of corticosteroids were observed, and the postoperative courses were uneventful in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical intraoperative use of corticosteroids in thyroid surgery with preserved RLN is safe and associated with improved early postoperative voice outcomes. No significant adverse events were observed, and RLN function was preserved in all cases. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term clinical relevance of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vipin Gupta, Gaurav Mishra, Shailendra Pal Singh, Ram Lakhan Singh Verma, Deepshikha, Somendra Pal Singh Chauhan, Aanya Gupta, Anand Pandey
Introduction: Sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy is performed using energy devices for dissection of the mesoappendix as well as sealing the base of the appendix without any use of clips, ligature, or knots. The study attempted to explore the feasibility and safety of a conventional bipolar Maryland forceps in completing laparoscopic sutureless appendectomy without using any other advanced energy device.
Methodology: It was a randomized controlled trial conducted on 180 patients. It included patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloop or conventional bipolar electrosurgery using Maryland forceps.
Result: The mean age group of the study population was 26.21 ± 7.98 years. Mean operating time in the endoloop group was 29.36 and 23.10 min in the bipolar Maryland group (p = 0.339). The mean diameter of the excised appendix specimen was 7.27 ± 0.95 mm in the former group, whereas 7.48 ± 0.96 mm in the latter group (p = 0.266). There were no significant postoperative complications in either group.
Conclusion: It appears that sealing the appendicular base using conventional bipolar electrosurgery (Maryland) is safe and feasible without any significant complications and can be used conveniently in sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy.
简介:无缝合线腹腔镜阑尾切除术采用能量装置剥离阑尾系膜,并密封阑尾底部,不使用任何夹子、结扎或结。本研究试图探讨传统双极马里兰钳在不使用任何其他先进能量装置的情况下完成腹腔镜无缝合线阑尾切除术的可行性和安全性。方法:采用随机对照试验,纳入180例患者。包括无并发症的急性阑尾炎患者。患者随机分为两组,分别采用内窥镜腹腔镜阑尾切除术或使用马里兰钳进行常规双极电手术。结果:研究人群平均年龄为26.21±7.98岁。endoloop组平均手术时间为29.36 min, bipolar Maryland组平均手术时间为23.10 min (p = 0.339)。前一组阑尾切除标本平均直径为7.27±0.95 mm,后一组为7.48±0.96 mm (p = 0.266)。两组术后均无明显并发症。结论:采用常规双极电刀(Maryland)封闭阑尾基底安全可行,无明显并发症,可方便地用于无缝合线腹腔镜阑尾切除术。试验报名:CTRI号:069386;https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=OTMyNTU=&Enc=&userName=。
{"title":"Sutureless Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Bipolar Maryland Versus Endoloop Technique. A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vipin Gupta, Gaurav Mishra, Shailendra Pal Singh, Ram Lakhan Singh Verma, Deepshikha, Somendra Pal Singh Chauhan, Aanya Gupta, Anand Pandey","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy is performed using energy devices for dissection of the mesoappendix as well as sealing the base of the appendix without any use of clips, ligature, or knots. The study attempted to explore the feasibility and safety of a conventional bipolar Maryland forceps in completing laparoscopic sutureless appendectomy without using any other advanced energy device.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It was a randomized controlled trial conducted on 180 patients. It included patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloop or conventional bipolar electrosurgery using Maryland forceps.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean age group of the study population was 26.21 ± 7.98 years. Mean operating time in the endoloop group was 29.36 and 23.10 min in the bipolar Maryland group (p = 0.339). The mean diameter of the excised appendix specimen was 7.27 ± 0.95 mm in the former group, whereas 7.48 ± 0.96 mm in the latter group (p = 0.266). There were no significant postoperative complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears that sealing the appendicular base using conventional bipolar electrosurgery (Maryland) is safe and feasible without any significant complications and can be used conveniently in sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI number: 069386; https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=OTMyNTU=&Enc=&userName=.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145565699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Advanced Surgical Skill Maintenance Among Asian Surgeons-Role of the Regional Trauma Societies.","authors":"Amila Sanjiva Ratnayake, Aireen Patricia Madrid, Raj Kumar Menon","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70171","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145557981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}