Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).07
Vasile Sarpe, Victor Rotaru
The analysis of the judicial practice shows that the medical forensic expert report represents a decisive evidence in the criminal proceedings, regarding crimes against the life and health, provided by articles 145-163 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Thus, the study carried out allows us to conclude that the medical forensic expert report can determine the court’s decision in criminal cases brought to trial. At the same time, the present study allows us to better understand how a medical forensic expert report can influence the qualification of a crime, but also the occurrence of errors in this process, therefore the study pursues the goal of reducing the number of that type of errors.
{"title":"Judicial assessment of the medical forensic expert report. Empirical study","authors":"Vasile Sarpe, Victor Rotaru","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).07","url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the judicial practice shows that the medical forensic expert report represents a decisive evidence in the criminal proceedings, regarding crimes against the life and health, provided by articles 145-163 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Thus, the study carried out allows us to conclude that the medical forensic expert report can determine the court’s decision in criminal cases brought to trial. At the same time, the present study allows us to better understand how a medical forensic expert report can influence the qualification of a crime, but also the occurrence of errors in this process, therefore the study pursues the goal of reducing the number of that type of errors.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114869235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).05
Ghennadi Epure
Revoking, replacing or ceasing preventive measures on legal grounds is a procedural institution inherent in coercive procedural measures, which allows the court, as well as the prosecutor to release the accused or the defendant, as appropriate. This procedure is regulated by art. 195 of the Criminal procedure code and requires to be explained practically: how the release is carried out while the accused/ defendant is kept under preventive arrest or home arrest, in order to avoid the breach of the right to liberty and security, as enshrined in art. 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
{"title":"Revocation, replacement and termination by law of preventive measures deprived of liberty","authors":"Ghennadi Epure","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).05","url":null,"abstract":"Revoking, replacing or ceasing preventive measures on legal grounds is a procedural institution inherent in coercive procedural measures, which allows the court, as well as the prosecutor to release the accused or the defendant, as appropriate. This procedure is regulated by art. 195 of the Criminal procedure code and requires to be explained practically: how the release is carried out while the accused/ defendant is kept under preventive arrest or home arrest, in order to avoid the breach of the right to liberty and security, as enshrined in art. 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122476435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).06
Tudor Osoianu, D. Ostavciuc
The authors operate theoretical interpretations of the rules of procedure applied by the investigating judges, as well as by the courts that exercise judicial control of the criminal investigation in the second degree of jurisdiction. The judicial control of the prejudicial procedure is carried out not only by the investigating judge, but also by the judges of the specialized panels of the appeal courts, who examine the appeals filed against the decisions of the investigating judges in the cases provided for by law. It was equally sought to ensure the balance between the general public interest of effective investigation of crimes, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the respect of the fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, who were willingly/nolently brought into the sphere of criminal justice. It is opted for the revision of the procedure of judicial control of the criminal prosecution primarily through legislation. In this sense, it is proposed that a separate article regulates the written rule procedure for examining the appeal on all conclusions pronounced by the investigating judge during the investigation, apart from those expressly indicated in art. 311 CPC.
{"title":"Judicial control of criminal prosecution in the second degree of jurisdiction – controversies and regulatory opportunities","authors":"Tudor Osoianu, D. Ostavciuc","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).06","url":null,"abstract":"The authors operate theoretical interpretations of the rules of procedure applied by the investigating judges, as well as by the courts that exercise judicial control of the criminal investigation in the second degree of jurisdiction. The judicial control of the prejudicial procedure is carried out not only by the investigating judge, but also by the judges of the specialized panels of the appeal courts, who examine the appeals filed against the decisions of the investigating judges in the cases provided for by law. It was equally sought to ensure the balance between the general public interest of effective investigation of crimes, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the respect of the fundamental rights and freedoms of all persons, who were willingly/nolently brought into the sphere of criminal justice. It is opted for the revision of the procedure of judicial control of the criminal prosecution primarily through legislation. In this sense, it is proposed that a separate article regulates the written rule procedure for examining the appeal on all conclusions pronounced by the investigating judge during the investigation, apart from those expressly indicated in art. 311 CPC.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121444525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).01
Alexandru Strimbeanu
Access to computerized information is illegal, if it is carried out either without authorization by law or contract, or exceeding the limits of authorization, or without the permission from a competent person to use, administer, or control a data system or to conduct scientific research or to perform any other operation in a data system. In order for access to computerized information to be considered legal, the presence of not only legitimate purposes, but also all other conditions that ensure compliance with legality is necessary.
{"title":"Illegal character of access to computerized information: condition for application of art. 259 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova","authors":"Alexandru Strimbeanu","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).01","url":null,"abstract":"Access to computerized information is illegal, if it is carried out either without authorization by law or contract, or exceeding the limits of authorization, or without the permission from a competent person to use, administer, or control a data system or to conduct scientific research or to perform any other operation in a data system. In order for access to computerized information to be considered legal, the presence of not only legitimate purposes, but also all other conditions that ensure compliance with legality is necessary.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121733538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).03
Valentin Margineanu
The article represents a plea for the return to rationality in law by approaching the fundamental aspect, the material aspect of rationality in law, that rationality which allows the identification of criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of law and the relationship between Law and Act. In this context, a historical retrospective of the evolution of the concept of rationality in law is carried out, which demonstrates the need to continue this theoretical approach until it becomes a reality in the conditions in which we aim to overcome the gap between the theoretical and applied framework, and the getting out of the crisis of law. Also, the vital necessity to return to rationality in law is justified, including through practical but also scientific arguments. At the same time, the study represents an appeal, a call to return to rationality and responsibility in the knowledge and application of the law and to continue efforts in order to achieve this desideratum.
{"title":"From the rationalism abandonment to the return to rationality","authors":"Valentin Margineanu","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).03","url":null,"abstract":"The article represents a plea for the return to rationality in law by approaching the fundamental aspect, the material aspect of rationality in law, that rationality which allows the identification of criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of law and the relationship between Law and Act. In this context, a historical retrospective of the evolution of the concept of rationality in law is carried out, which demonstrates the need to continue this theoretical approach until it becomes a reality in the conditions in which we aim to overcome the gap between the theoretical and applied framework, and the getting out of the crisis of law. Also, the vital necessity to return to rationality in law is justified, including through practical but also scientific arguments. At the same time, the study represents an appeal, a call to return to rationality and responsibility in the knowledge and application of the law and to continue efforts in order to achieve this desideratum.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"190 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126502207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).04
Petru Virlan
The crime of illicit enrichment was, is and will not lose its relevance in the context of the development of social, economic and political relations. Given the fact that in the composition of this crime we find a specific element, which refers to the manner of committing the crime by a person with a position of responsibility or by a public person, we consider it imperative to report on this fact and to we come with clarifications, as well as to establish the factors that formed the basis of the formation of this element without which it is not possible to incriminate the crime. We support the idea that this aspect should be discussed in the context of the numerous criminal cases initiated on the basis of this article, and which often cause difficulties for the criminal investigation body.
{"title":"The objective side of the crime of illegal enrichment","authors":"Petru Virlan","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).04","url":null,"abstract":"The crime of illicit enrichment was, is and will not lose its relevance in the context of the development of social, economic and political relations. Given the fact that in the composition of this crime we find a specific element, which refers to the manner of committing the crime by a person with a position of responsibility or by a public person, we consider it imperative to report on this fact and to we come with clarifications, as well as to establish the factors that formed the basis of the formation of this element without which it is not possible to incriminate the crime. We support the idea that this aspect should be discussed in the context of the numerous criminal cases initiated on the basis of this article, and which often cause difficulties for the criminal investigation body.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"11 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133684734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).01
Tatiana Vizdoaga, Iulia Bria
The essence of the presumption of innocence does not consist in the fact that the accused, as a rule, is innocent, but it assumes that as long as we do not have a definitive sentence of conviction, there is no legally guilty person of committing the crime. The importance of this rule for the construction and democratic functioning of the criminal process, as well as for the defense of persons held criminally liable, is difficult to overestimate. The person’s guilt is not considered proven and he cannot be recognized as guilty of committing the crime and, respectively, subject to any restrictions on his rights, except for those related to the investigation of the criminal case, the grounds and order of application of which are strictly regulated by law. Introduction the presumption of innocence in the Code of Criminal Procedure as a general principle did not by itself remove all the deficiencies regarding the proper application of this principle in the practical activity of law enforcement bodies. This is not only due to the lack of desire of the participants in the process to comply with the rules derived from this principle, thus complicating the activity of research and discovery of crimes, but also due to reasons of improper perception, distorted of its essence. The correct understanding and interpretation of the essence and peculiarities of the presumption of innocence, the problems related to its application, is impossible without an incursion into the matter of legal presumptions and without determining the place of the presumption of innocence in their complex system.
{"title":"The presumption of innocence in the system of legal presumptions","authors":"Tatiana Vizdoaga, Iulia Bria","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).01","url":null,"abstract":"The essence of the presumption of innocence does not consist in the fact that the accused, as a rule, is innocent, but it assumes that as long as we do not have a definitive sentence of conviction, there is no legally guilty person of committing the crime. The importance of this rule for the construction and democratic functioning of the criminal process, as well as for the defense of persons held criminally liable, is difficult to overestimate. The person’s guilt is not considered proven and he cannot be recognized as guilty of committing the crime and, respectively, subject to any restrictions on his rights, except for those related to the investigation of the criminal case, the grounds and order of application of which are strictly regulated by law. Introduction the presumption of innocence in the Code of Criminal Procedure as a general principle did not by itself remove all the deficiencies regarding the proper application of this principle in the practical activity of law enforcement bodies. This is not only due to the lack of desire of the participants in the process to comply with the rules derived from this principle, thus complicating the activity of research and discovery of crimes, but also due to reasons of improper perception, distorted of its essence. The correct understanding and interpretation of the essence and peculiarities of the presumption of innocence, the problems related to its application, is impossible without an incursion into the matter of legal presumptions and without determining the place of the presumption of innocence in their complex system.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125876006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).06
Ana Bagrinovschi
An essential principle of the rule of law is the principle of legality, which implies compliance with the Constitution and the normative acts by all subjects of law, including and in their capacity as participants in the civil circuit (natural persons, legal persons). A limited liability company is a legal subject from the date of its registration in the State Register of Legal Entities until the date of its removal from the Register, and in the period between these two dates it must live its ‘life’, operate and function in full compliance with the provisions of the relevant legal acts. This requirement applies both to the company as a legal person and to its structural elements (general meeting of shareholders, administrator, board, board of auditors, members, etc.). The actions of the organs of the legal person are considered actions of the legal person itself if they have been carried out in compliance with the legal provisions. If there is any doubt, those with a legal interest are entitled to apply to the competent courts to verify the legality of legal acts (decisions, resolutions, contracts, etc.) and, if necessary, to ask for them to be remedied - including having them declared null and void.
{"title":"Judicial review of the legality of decisions of the General Meeting of Members of the Limited Liability Company","authors":"Ana Bagrinovschi","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).06","url":null,"abstract":"An essential principle of the rule of law is the principle of legality, which implies compliance with the Constitution and the normative acts by all subjects of law, including and in their capacity as participants in the civil circuit (natural persons, legal persons). A limited liability company is a legal subject from the date of its registration in the State Register of Legal Entities until the date of its removal from the Register, and in the period between these two dates it must live its ‘life’, operate and function in full compliance with the provisions of the relevant legal acts. This requirement applies both to the company as a legal person and to its structural elements (general meeting of shareholders, administrator, board, board of auditors, members, etc.). The actions of the organs of the legal person are considered actions of the legal person itself if they have been carried out in compliance with the legal provisions. If there is any doubt, those with a legal interest are entitled to apply to the competent courts to verify the legality of legal acts (decisions, resolutions, contracts, etc.) and, if necessary, to ask for them to be remedied - including having them declared null and void.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132200226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).02
Vitalie Jitariuc
Issues relating to the classification of special investigative measures are of substantial importance to the theory and practice of special investigative work. The specialized literature records certain attempts regarding the arrangement of special investigative measures by categories and groups based on different grounds, but, in total, the issues related to the classification of special investigative measures have been insufficiently studied in the theory of special investigative activity, from which consideration they follow to be subjected to substantial scientific research. Likewise, the operative-investigative doctrine does not highlight a certain opinion regarding the classification of special investigative measures. This happens because the special investigative measures have an extremely diversified character, they are varied, as a result of which each specialist in the field comes up with his own classification, trying to justify it based on his own experience and knowledge that he considers relevant. The process of perfecting the notions and concepts specific to the special investigative activity must be based on logical operations, procedures and interpretations. They are of major importance for solving several questions and for carrying out various tasks of the science of special investigative activity and, first of all, for the materialization of its basic categories, to which the classification of special investigative measures is attributed. The circumstances in question determined the necessity and actuality of conducting a complex study of the classification of special investigative measures based on the analysis, interpretation and systematization of doctrinal opinions on this subject.
{"title":"Classification of special investigative measures","authors":"Vitalie Jitariuc","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).02","url":null,"abstract":"Issues relating to the classification of special investigative measures are of substantial importance to the theory and practice of special investigative work. The specialized literature records certain attempts regarding the arrangement of special investigative measures by categories and groups based on different grounds, but, in total, the issues related to the classification of special investigative measures have been insufficiently studied in the theory of special investigative activity, from which consideration they follow to be subjected to substantial scientific research. Likewise, the operative-investigative doctrine does not highlight a certain opinion regarding the classification of special investigative measures. This happens because the special investigative measures have an extremely diversified character, they are varied, as a result of which each specialist in the field comes up with his own classification, trying to justify it based on his own experience and knowledge that he considers relevant. The process of perfecting the notions and concepts specific to the special investigative activity must be based on logical operations, procedures and interpretations. They are of major importance for solving several questions and for carrying out various tasks of the science of special investigative activity and, first of all, for the materialization of its basic categories, to which the classification of special investigative measures is attributed. The circumstances in question determined the necessity and actuality of conducting a complex study of the classification of special investigative measures based on the analysis, interpretation and systematization of doctrinal opinions on this subject.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129831636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).03
Ion Chirtoaca
The legal basis for the examination of criminal cases before the court its submission by the prosecutor who drew up the indictment act. As a consequence of the prosecutor’s action, it is bringing the person/persons before the courts, who, from the prosecutor’s perspective, are to be held criminally liable. Therefore, the legal action determined by the submission of the indictment act is supported by an active subject, in the person of the prosecutor, from this point of view, the role of the prosecutor at the preliminary hearing phase is a complex one. Or, it is known that a first purpose of the accusation before the first instance is to hold the person liable. The above, in no way cancels the postulate that the prosecution must be legal and thorough. This study provides a through analysis of specific actions for the preliminary hearing, which the prosecutor have to exercise when the case is tried before the first court.
{"title":"Specific actions of the prosecutor at the stage of the preliminary hearing","authors":"Ion Chirtoaca","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.4(63).03","url":null,"abstract":"The legal basis for the examination of criminal cases before the court its submission by the prosecutor who drew up the indictment act. As a consequence of the prosecutor’s action, it is bringing the person/persons before the courts, who, from the prosecutor’s perspective, are to be held criminally liable. Therefore, the legal action determined by the submission of the indictment act is supported by an active subject, in the person of the prosecutor, from this point of view, the role of the prosecutor at the preliminary hearing phase is a complex one. Or, it is known that a first purpose of the accusation before the first instance is to hold the person liable. The above, in no way cancels the postulate that the prosecution must be legal and thorough. This study provides a through analysis of specific actions for the preliminary hearing, which the prosecutor have to exercise when the case is tried before the first court.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115251123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：