Pub Date : 2024-02-27DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/22597
Serena Barbuto
Henning Börm, Mordende Mitbürger. Stasis und Bürgerkrieg in griechischen Poleis des Hellenismus [Historia – Einzelschriften 258], Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2019, S. 362. ISBN: 978-3-515-12311-2.
{"title":"Henning Börm, Mordende Mitbürger. Stasis und Bürgerkrieg in griechischen Poleis des Hellenismus","authors":"Serena Barbuto","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/22597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/22597","url":null,"abstract":"Henning Börm, Mordende Mitbürger. Stasis und Bürgerkrieg in griechischen Poleis des Hellenismus [Historia – Einzelschriften 258], Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2019, S. 362. ISBN: 978-3-515-12311-2.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140426798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19926
David D. Phillips
The prevailing interpretation of the case of Dracontius (X. An. 4.8.25) has long been that Dracontius was exiled from Sparta for unintentional homicide. This paper argues that that interpretation is incorrect. Xenophon’s description of the event indicates that Dracontius intended to strike his victim. Consequently, comparanda including the laws of Athens, of Antiphon’s Tetralogies, and of Plato’s Laws support the conclusion that Dracontius was treated as an intentional killer. The duration of Dracontius’ exile provides further evidence in favor of this position. Strict liability for homicide at Sparta, of the type familiar from the case of Patroclus (Hom. Il. 23.85-88) and from Homeric and Hesiodic epic generally, is contraindicated by the Spartan concern with oliganthrōpia and the violence of the agōgē. Whether Dracontius’ exile was penal or voluntary thus depends on the penalty for intentional homicidein Spartan law. If that penalty was fixed, then in all probability it was fixed at death, and Dracontius fled of his own accord to avoid that punishment. If, however, the penalty was assessable, then Dracontius either was sentenced to exile or fled voluntarily to avoid a possible sentence of death. These two alternative reconstructions of the Spartan law of intentional homicide in turn determine the reconstruction of the law of unintentional homicide, which will have carried a lesser penalty.
{"title":"The Case of Dracontius (X. An. 4.8.25) and Spartan Homicide Law","authors":"David D. Phillips","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19926","url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing interpretation of the case of Dracontius (X. An. 4.8.25) has long been that Dracontius was exiled from Sparta for unintentional homicide. This paper argues that that interpretation is incorrect. Xenophon’s description of the event indicates that Dracontius intended to strike his victim. Consequently, comparanda including the laws of Athens, of Antiphon’s Tetralogies, and of Plato’s Laws support the conclusion that Dracontius was treated as an intentional killer. The duration of Dracontius’ exile provides further evidence in favor of this position. Strict liability for homicide at Sparta, of the type familiar from the case of Patroclus (Hom. Il. 23.85-88) and from Homeric and Hesiodic epic generally, is contraindicated by the Spartan concern with oliganthrōpia and the violence of the agōgē. Whether Dracontius’ exile was penal or voluntary thus depends on the penalty for intentional homicidein Spartan law. If that penalty was fixed, then in all probability it was fixed at death, and Dracontius fled of his own accord to avoid that punishment. If, however, the penalty was assessable, then Dracontius either was sentenced to exile or fled voluntarily to avoid a possible sentence of death. These two alternative reconstructions of the Spartan law of intentional homicide in turn determine the reconstruction of the law of unintentional homicide, which will have carried a lesser penalty.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123338670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19927
E. Poddighe, L. Loddo
This paper analyses Euxitheus’ legal arguments in the trial against Eubulides (Dem. 57) and proposes a new analysis of the ephesis procedure. Within this framework it argues that Euxitheus’ forensic strategy is not only relevant to the question at issue – to prove his status as a legitimate citizen (gnesios polites), as someone born from two citizen parents – but is also characterised by a strict adherence to the laws and procedure involving his case. The relation between rhetoric and law emerging in Euxitheus’ speech reveals a rhetorical strategy grounded on legal evidence and documents. This essay will especially focus on two important arguments in the speech, that is, the use of religious arguments and the theme of the plot against Euxitheus, which prove extremely enlightening in showing the how the relevant procedure shaped Euxitheus’ arguments. To this aim section II compares Dem. 57and other probable cases of ephesis in order to reassess how the ephesis procedure worked when it arose from a diapsephisis. Section III shows that the arguments used by Euxitheus are to be considered relevant to winning an ephesis case in court.The entire speech is effectively constructed to demonstrate ‘what is true’ against Eubulides’ ‘false accusations’ and ‘defamatory statements’ (57.1), that is, to use legal arguments against ‘the sykophant’s game’: to allege everything but prove nothing’.
{"title":"Ephesis against Eubulides (Dem. 57): Legal Arguments against the Sykophant’s Game","authors":"E. Poddighe, L. Loddo","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19927","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses Euxitheus’ legal arguments in the trial against Eubulides (Dem. 57) and proposes a new analysis of the ephesis procedure. Within this framework it argues that Euxitheus’ forensic strategy is not only relevant to the question at issue – to prove his status as a legitimate citizen (gnesios polites), as someone born from two citizen parents – but is also characterised by a strict adherence to the laws and procedure involving his case. The relation between rhetoric and law emerging in Euxitheus’ speech reveals a rhetorical strategy grounded on legal evidence and documents. This essay will especially focus on two important arguments in the speech, that is, the use of religious arguments and the theme of the plot against Euxitheus, which prove extremely enlightening in showing the how the relevant procedure shaped Euxitheus’ arguments. To this aim section II compares Dem. 57and other probable cases of ephesis in order to reassess how the ephesis procedure worked when it arose from a diapsephisis. Section III shows that the arguments used by Euxitheus are to be considered relevant to winning an ephesis case in court.The entire speech is effectively constructed to demonstrate ‘what is true’ against Eubulides’ ‘false accusations’ and ‘defamatory statements’ (57.1), that is, to use legal arguments against ‘the sykophant’s game’: to allege everything but prove nothing’.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"73 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114023139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19934
Jack W. G. Schropp
Marie-Kathrin Drauschke, Die Aufstellung zwischenstaatlicher Vereinbarungen in griechischen Heiligtümern, Hamburg, Verlag Dr. Kovač, 2019, 557 S. ISBN: 978-3-339-11068-8
{"title":"Marie-Kathrin Drauschke, Die Aufstellung zwischenstaatlicher Vereinbarungen in griechischen Heiligtümern","authors":"Jack W. G. Schropp","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19934","url":null,"abstract":"Marie-Kathrin Drauschke, Die Aufstellung zwischenstaatlicher Vereinbarungen in griechischen Heiligtümern, Hamburg, Verlag Dr. Kovač, 2019, 557 S. ISBN: 978-3-339-11068-8","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124810767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19935
Éva Jakab
Quintijn Mauer, Application, Adaptation and Rejection. The strategies of Roman jurists in responsa concerning Greek documents, Bodegraven, AlphaZet prepress, 2022, pp. XV + 285. ISBN: 978-94-6236-291-8
Quintijn Mauer, Application, Adaptation and Rejection.罗马法学家在有关希腊文件的回应中的策略》，Bodegraven，AlphaZet prepress，2022 年，第 XV + 285 页。国际标准书号：978-94-6236-291-8
{"title":"Quintijn Mauer, Application, Adaptation and Rejection. The strategies of Roman jurists in responsa concerning Greek documents","authors":"Éva Jakab","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19935","url":null,"abstract":"Quintijn Mauer, Application, Adaptation and Rejection. The strategies of Roman jurists in responsa concerning Greek documents, Bodegraven, AlphaZet prepress, 2022, pp. XV + 285. ISBN: 978-94-6236-291-8","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"580 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133825014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19929
Karin Wiedergut
The vast and well-preserved necropolis areas in Hierapolis hold several tombs which belonged to members of the local Jewish community. Most of the 27 pertaining epitaphs are perfectly within the scope of local (i.e. pagan) traditions and habits. One text, however, clearly stands out: The sarcophagus inscription of Tatianus and Apphia, Ioudaioi, contains several remarkable features which call for closer consideration. Most of them pertain to the sphere of legal history in the Roman East or, more specifically, to rare peculiarities within the widespread system of tomb protection in Asia Minor: the concession of rights to a sarcophagus from husband to wife, an oddly phrased prohibition against unwarranted burials, the involvement of both a private individual and a public institution in a tomb’s protection, and a uniquely designed „clause of official recording“. The text’s most striking feature, however, deals with the couple’s transferral into „ancestral soil“ (patrōa gē)—with no further specification given on the stone. The article examines all these highly irregular features one by one in the context of Jewish and pagan epitaphs from Hierapolis and beyond. Special regard is given to the couple’s idea of „ancestral soil“, which, as is shown in detail, may well have been Judaea. The text, thus, may deliver early evidence for the wish of Diaspora Jews to be transferred there after death.
{"title":"Returning to Ancestral Soil. A Commentary on IJudOr II 193 (Hierapolis/Phrygia)","authors":"Karin Wiedergut","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19929","url":null,"abstract":"The vast and well-preserved necropolis areas in Hierapolis hold several tombs which belonged to members of the local Jewish community. Most of the 27 pertaining epitaphs are perfectly within the scope of local (i.e. pagan) traditions and habits. One text, however, clearly stands out: The sarcophagus inscription of Tatianus and Apphia, Ioudaioi, contains several remarkable features which call for closer consideration. Most of them pertain to the sphere of legal history in the Roman East or, more specifically, to rare peculiarities within the widespread system of tomb protection in Asia Minor: the concession of rights to a sarcophagus from husband to wife, an oddly phrased prohibition against unwarranted burials, the involvement of both a private individual and a public institution in a tomb’s protection, and a uniquely designed „clause of official recording“. The text’s most striking feature, however, deals with the couple’s transferral into „ancestral soil“ (patrōa gē)—with no further specification given on the stone. The article examines all these highly irregular features one by one in the context of Jewish and pagan epitaphs from Hierapolis and beyond. Special regard is given to the couple’s idea of „ancestral soil“, which, as is shown in detail, may well have been Judaea. The text, thus, may deliver early evidence for the wish of Diaspora Jews to be transferred there after death.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124366806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19932
A. Maffi
Edwin Carawan, Control of the Laws in the Ancient Democracy at Athens, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020, pp. XI + 308. ISBN 13: 978-1-4214-3949-5
Isbn 13: 978-1-4214-3949-5
{"title":"Edwin Carawan, Control of the Laws in the Ancient Democracy at Athens","authors":"A. Maffi","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19932","url":null,"abstract":"Edwin Carawan, Control of the Laws in the Ancient Democracy at Athens, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020, pp. XI + 308. ISBN 13: 978-1-4214-3949-5","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122547362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19931
Alberto Maffi
Jan B. Meister u. Gunnar Seelentag (Hrsg.), Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, Stuttgart, SteinerVerlag, 2020, 465 S. ISBN: 978-3-515-12505-5.
Jan B.Meister 和 Gunnar Seelentag（编著），Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik，斯图加特，SteinerVerlag，2020 年，465 页。ISBN: 978-3-515-12505-5.
{"title":"Jan B. Meister u. Gunnar Seelentag (Hrsg.), Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik","authors":"Alberto Maffi","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19931","url":null,"abstract":"Jan B. Meister u. Gunnar Seelentag (Hrsg.), Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, Stuttgart, SteinerVerlag, 2020, 465 S. ISBN: 978-3-515-12505-5.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125984433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19928
Serena Barbuto
Il termine ‘amnistia’ è divenuto, nella storia degli studi, sinonimo esclusivo del celeberrimo provvedimento ateniese del 403 a.C., redatto dal re spartano Pausania II in collaborazione con dieci o quindici arbitri. La pluralità di fonti documentarie in merito a tale evento, che segnò profondamente la storia di Atene, spinge nella direzione di un’interpretazione a senso unico dell’istituto dell’amnistia, definibile come la proibizione a perseguire in giudizio i responsabili dei crimini commessi nel periodo della tirannide dei Trenta (404/3 a.C.). Sarebbe opportuno, tuttavia, abbandonare tale concezione atenocentrica in favore di una visione più allargata, volta a interpretare il modello ateniese come l’exemplum più illustre – o, quantomeno, meglio documentato – nell’ambito di un fenomeno tutt’altro che univoco che, a partire dalla seconda metà del V secolo, interessò svariate poleis del mondo greco. L’attenzione preminente dedicata al caso ateniese nella letteratura critica è senz’altro frutto di una ricostruzione che si è calcificata nel corso dei decenni – ciò in virtù dell’abbondanza delle fonti sul caso ateniese contro un’estrema scarsità di documentazione sugli altri casi – ma che, al tempo dei Greci, non sarebbe apparsa forse corrispondente alla realtà. Di recente, uno sforzo in tal senso è stato compiuto da Martin Dreher in un significativo contributo del 2013, in cui lo studioso prospetta un catalogo di tutti i casi noti di amnistia del mondo greco: esso costituisce il punto di partenza ideale per una ricerca estensiva sull’amnistia.
在教育史上，“大赦”一词已成为公元前403年著名的雅典法令的唯一同义词，该法令是斯巴达国王保罗萨尼亚二世与10或15名仲裁员合作制定的。文献来源的多样性就这一事件,标志着雅典的历史深感,大赦研究所解释单行道的方向发展,定义,如禁止在法庭上起诉暴政的30年期间的罪行负有责任(404/3 a . C .)。atenocentrica最好,然而,放弃这一概念支持一项更广泛的观点,解释最著名的雅典作为l’exemplum模式更好地—或至少记录—现象远未得到明确的范围内,自第五世纪下半叶以来,希腊世界的各种poleis的兴趣。雅典主要的关注情况下在文学批评是无疑是一个重建的结果,在过去的几十年里—这是calcificata雅典丰产根据来源的情况下反对文件其他情况下—严重短缺,但希腊的时间,这也许似乎不现实。最近，马丁·德雷赫(Martin Dreher)在2013年的一份重要贡献中做出了这一努力。
{"title":"Le amnistie di Dikaia e il giuramento nella riconciliazione post-stasis","authors":"Serena Barbuto","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19928","url":null,"abstract":"Il termine ‘amnistia’ è divenuto, nella storia degli studi, sinonimo esclusivo del celeberrimo provvedimento ateniese del 403 a.C., redatto dal re spartano Pausania II in collaborazione con dieci o quindici arbitri. La pluralità di fonti documentarie in merito a tale evento, che segnò profondamente la storia di Atene, spinge nella direzione di un’interpretazione a senso unico dell’istituto dell’amnistia, definibile come la proibizione a perseguire in giudizio i responsabili dei crimini commessi nel periodo della tirannide dei Trenta (404/3 a.C.). Sarebbe opportuno, tuttavia, abbandonare tale concezione atenocentrica in favore di una visione più allargata, volta a interpretare il modello ateniese come l’exemplum più illustre – o, quantomeno, meglio documentato – nell’ambito di un fenomeno tutt’altro che univoco che, a partire dalla seconda metà del V secolo, interessò svariate poleis del mondo greco. L’attenzione preminente dedicata al caso ateniese nella letteratura critica è senz’altro frutto di una ricostruzione che si è calcificata nel corso dei decenni – ciò in virtù dell’abbondanza delle fonti sul caso ateniese contro un’estrema scarsità di documentazione sugli altri casi – ma che, al tempo dei Greci, non sarebbe apparsa forse corrispondente alla realtà. Di recente, uno sforzo in tal senso è stato compiuto da Martin Dreher in un significativo contributo del 2013, in cui lo studioso prospetta un catalogo di tutti i casi noti di amnistia del mondo greco: esso costituisce il punto di partenza ideale per una ricerca estensiva sull’amnistia.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133217570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-13DOI: 10.54103/1128-8221/19925
M. Dreher
Der Artikel diskutiert das Problem, wie und unter welchen Bedingungen die Gesetze in den antiken griechischen Polen ungültig wurden.
本文讨论了古希腊早期法律是如何废除的问题，以及在何种条件下废除的。
{"title":"Das Ungültigwerden von Gesetzen in den griechischen Poleis","authors":"M. Dreher","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19925","url":null,"abstract":"Der Artikel diskutiert das Problem, wie und unter welchen Bedingungen die Gesetze in den antiken griechischen Polen ungültig wurden.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130969141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：