Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.55974
N. Sergiienko, V. Prylovskyi, M. Burdin, M. Dei, Hanna Z. Ostapenko
The purpose of this research paper is to study the concept and legal regulation of enforcement actions and their suspension in Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Armenia. The methodology of this article is based on the application of various methods of scientific knowledge, including analytical method, deductive method, synthesis method, hermeneutic method, comparative method, modeling method. The results of scientific research presented in this article contain the author's definitions of "enforcement actions", "suspension of enforcement actions", generalization of legal regulation of enforcement actions and their suspension under the laws of Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Armenia. The practical significance of the results presented in the article lies in the possibility of taking them into account both by legal theorists, in particular those working on the subject of enforcement proceedings, and legal practitioners, in particular those involved in the enforcement of various jurisdictional decisions.
{"title":"Enforcement actions and their suspension: the concept and legal regulation in Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Armenia","authors":"N. Sergiienko, V. Prylovskyi, M. Burdin, M. Dei, Hanna Z. Ostapenko","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.55974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.55974","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research paper is to study the concept and legal regulation of enforcement actions and their suspension in Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Armenia. The methodology of this article is based on the application of various methods of scientific knowledge, including analytical method, deductive method, synthesis method, hermeneutic method, comparative method, modeling method. The results of scientific research presented in this article contain the author's definitions of \"enforcement actions\", \"suspension of enforcement actions\", generalization of legal regulation of enforcement actions and their suspension under the laws of Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Armenia. The practical significance of the results presented in the article lies in the possibility of taking them into account both by legal theorists, in particular those working on the subject of enforcement proceedings, and legal practitioners, in particular those involved in the enforcement of various jurisdictional decisions.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133480405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.63799
Ridwan Arifin
The discourse on justice and equality is not only a concern for Indonesia but also for the global context. Justice and equality are understood in various contexts, both in relation to where justice and equality are applied, when and to whom. But basically, justice and equality have the same goal, which is to ensure that everyone feels safe and gets the same treatment without discriminating against anything.
{"title":"Justice and Equality: The Endless Question","authors":"Ridwan Arifin","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.63799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.63799","url":null,"abstract":"The discourse on justice and equality is not only a concern for Indonesia but also for the global context. Justice and equality are understood in various contexts, both in relation to where justice and equality are applied, when and to whom. But basically, justice and equality have the same goal, which is to ensure that everyone feels safe and gets the same treatment without discriminating against anything.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"1996 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128207359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58038
Ahmed M A Hamad, Rachma Indriyani, Ammar M. Mahmoud Al Ramadan, R. A. Fitriono
The principle of separation of powers among the three organs of government i.e., the Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary are one of the main pillars of the democratic system. This principle guarantees a balance of powers between these three organs. However, in Palestine, the issue arises as a result of a lack of commitment from these organs to practically apply this principle in accordance with the Palestinian Basic Law of 2003. Nevertheless, in Indonesian Constitution of 1945 has stated that is a democratic country with the foundation of a separation of powers. In addition, the practice in Indonesia shows that there is various constitutional mechanism to split the power. The objectives of this article are to examine the practice of separation of powers in Palestine and Indonesia and to harmonize the theoretical and practical aspects. In order to achieve these objectives, doctrinal legal research using the qualitative approach was engaged. Findings show that the principle of separation of powers was not fully practiced in Palestine between the three organs, especially the Executive and there is an absence of constitutional oversight. This article recommends that the role of the Palestinian Supreme Constitutional Court be activated to monitor all three governmental organs to ensure that this principle is fully implemented.
{"title":"Separation of Powers in the Palestinian Law: Does it Reflect the Democratic System? (A Comparative Approach with Indonesia)","authors":"Ahmed M A Hamad, Rachma Indriyani, Ammar M. Mahmoud Al Ramadan, R. A. Fitriono","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58038","url":null,"abstract":"The principle of separation of powers among the three organs of government i.e., the Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary are one of the main pillars of the democratic system. This principle guarantees a balance of powers between these three organs. However, in Palestine, the issue arises as a result of a lack of commitment from these organs to practically apply this principle in accordance with the Palestinian Basic Law of 2003. Nevertheless, in Indonesian Constitution of 1945 has stated that is a democratic country with the foundation of a separation of powers. In addition, the practice in Indonesia shows that there is various constitutional mechanism to split the power. The objectives of this article are to examine the practice of separation of powers in Palestine and Indonesia and to harmonize the theoretical and practical aspects. In order to achieve these objectives, doctrinal legal research using the qualitative approach was engaged. Findings show that the principle of separation of powers was not fully practiced in Palestine between the three organs, especially the Executive and there is an absence of constitutional oversight. This article recommends that the role of the Palestinian Supreme Constitutional Court be activated to monitor all three governmental organs to ensure that this principle is fully implemented.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125244775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.61096
Maya Sinta
The book entitled “Restorative Justice di Indonesia” was written by Ahmad Syahril Yunus, S.H. and Dr. Irsyad Dahri, S.H., M.H. Restorative Justice is the restoration, compensation, and repayment of a part of the relationship between the victims and perpetrators, as well as the society regarding the prosperity or conciliation in criminal justice system. Specifically, this book focuses on the steps involved in implementing Restorative Justice and social justice responses for criminal victims in Indonesia. This book also presents empirical data that shows how Restorative Justice has been used in legal practice by several countries, how victims and perpetrators respond to a new perspective on the legal system through the resolution of Restorative Justice, and how far this can be used effectively to create a standard of punishment and compensation based on fair and balanced treatment of victims and perpetrators.
{"title":"Legal Protection for Criminal Justice: A Book Review ‘Restorative Justice di Indonesia’, Ahmad Syharil Yunus SH and Dr Irsyad Dahri SH MH, Guepedia, Bogor Indonesia, 2021, 142 pages, ISBN 978-623-5525-98-3","authors":"Maya Sinta","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.61096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.61096","url":null,"abstract":"The book entitled “Restorative Justice di Indonesia” was written by Ahmad Syahril Yunus, S.H. and Dr. Irsyad Dahri, S.H., M.H. Restorative Justice is the restoration, compensation, and repayment of a part of the relationship between the victims and perpetrators, as well as the society regarding the prosperity or conciliation in criminal justice system. Specifically, this book focuses on the steps involved in implementing Restorative Justice and social justice responses for criminal victims in Indonesia. This book also presents empirical data that shows how Restorative Justice has been used in legal practice by several countries, how victims and perpetrators respond to a new perspective on the legal system through the resolution of Restorative Justice, and how far this can be used effectively to create a standard of punishment and compensation based on fair and balanced treatment of victims and perpetrators.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134232716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56059
David Tan
The Indonesian government has long been committed to developing the business conditions, particularly for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The debut of a single-person limited company (perseroan perorangan) is one of the numerous ambitions of this crucial aspiration. Debates circling this novel kind of company in Indonesia remain a heated debate between practitioners, jurists, scholars, and the government. This article endeavors to elucidate these debates by concentrating on the legal theories encompassing company laws, the practice of single-member limited liability companies overseas and domestically and scrutinizing the single-person limited companies amid the contemporary Indonesian legal dan regulatory regime. This research utilizes doctrinal legal study and secondary data. Dogmatic literature reviews are carried out on scholarly works concerning the subject matter, and the analysis is carried out using the qualitative method. This inquiry reveals that the current single-person limited companies in Indonesia are supported adequately by several legal theories. This sort of company has been exercised in numerous nations, mainly in Europe. There is also room for legislative and executive development and juridical enhancement to ultimately maximize the company's potential.
{"title":"Scrutinizing Perseroan Perorangan: The Brainchild of Societas Unius Personae in the Realm of Indonesian Company Laws","authors":"David Tan","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56059","url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian government has long been committed to developing the business conditions, particularly for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The debut of a single-person limited company (perseroan perorangan) is one of the numerous ambitions of this crucial aspiration. Debates circling this novel kind of company in Indonesia remain a heated debate between practitioners, jurists, scholars, and the government. This article endeavors to elucidate these debates by concentrating on the legal theories encompassing company laws, the practice of single-member limited liability companies overseas and domestically and scrutinizing the single-person limited companies amid the contemporary Indonesian legal dan regulatory regime. This research utilizes doctrinal legal study and secondary data. Dogmatic literature reviews are carried out on scholarly works concerning the subject matter, and the analysis is carried out using the qualitative method. This inquiry reveals that the current single-person limited companies in Indonesia are supported adequately by several legal theories. This sort of company has been exercised in numerous nations, mainly in Europe. There is also room for legislative and executive development and juridical enhancement to ultimately maximize the company's potential.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133253791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56310
Basel Al-Nawaiseh
Due to the increase in dealing with lease contracts in the State of Qatar, attention to these contracts and the resulting disputes has been one of the most important priorities of the Qatari lawmaker, especially with regard to the speedy resolution of these disputes, which has a significant impact on achieving justice and stability of transactions within the community. In order to prevent prolonging the litigation period in lease disputes, Law No. (4) of (2008) regarding renting real estate came and established a new phase of litigation procedures in relation to lease disputes through Article (21) thereof, which provided for the establishment of a specialized committee to look into lease disputes called Lease Dispute Settlement Committee. This committee is headed by a judge with the rank of chief from the Court of First Instance chosen by the Supreme Judicial Council. In implementation of this, Cabinet Resolution No (37) of 2008 was issued regarding the rules and procedures to be followed before the lease dispute settlement committees. This study came to clarify these rules and procedures and their role in resolving lease disputes and their reflection on the speed of litigation and their compatibility with the guarantees and basic principles of litigation in accordance with Qatari law.
{"title":"The Procedural Rules Followed Before the Lease Dispute Settlement Committees and Their Compatibility with the Basic Guarantees and Principles of Litigation in Accordance with Qatari Law","authors":"Basel Al-Nawaiseh","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56310","url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increase in dealing with lease contracts in the State of Qatar, attention to these contracts and the resulting disputes has been one of the most important priorities of the Qatari lawmaker, especially with regard to the speedy resolution of these disputes, which has a significant impact on achieving justice and stability of transactions within the community. In order to prevent prolonging the litigation period in lease disputes, Law No. (4) of (2008) regarding renting real estate came and established a new phase of litigation procedures in relation to lease disputes through Article (21) thereof, which provided for the establishment of a specialized committee to look into lease disputes called Lease Dispute Settlement Committee. This committee is headed by a judge with the rank of chief from the Court of First Instance chosen by the Supreme Judicial Council. In implementation of this, Cabinet Resolution No (37) of 2008 was issued regarding the rules and procedures to be followed before the lease dispute settlement committees. This study came to clarify these rules and procedures and their role in resolving lease disputes and their reflection on the speed of litigation and their compatibility with the guarantees and basic principles of litigation in accordance with Qatari law.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123576434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848
Ahmad Siboy, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Asrul Ibrahim Nur, N. Hidayah
Judicial review ensures that no regulations are contrary to higher laws, and none is unfair to people. The review of Indonesia's laws and regulations is conducted based on a hierarchy of laws and regulations. However, many laws and regulations are not within the hierarchy that raises uncertainty about the institutions that are authorized to review them. This research aims to offer an alternative review authority against all types of laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This research employed normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and historical approaches. This study stated that the alternative design of regulatory, judicial review is the unification of all judicial reviews' authority into one judicial institution. Second, separation into judicial institutions is different from the model of separation based on the order of hierarchy of legislation, based on the scope of usable power (local and national), based on legislation and non-legislation, based on the forming and separation institutions with cross-subsidy models.
{"title":"Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model","authors":"Ahmad Siboy, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Asrul Ibrahim Nur, N. Hidayah","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848","url":null,"abstract":"Judicial review ensures that no regulations are contrary to higher laws, and none is unfair to people. The review of Indonesia's laws and regulations is conducted based on a hierarchy of laws and regulations. However, many laws and regulations are not within the hierarchy that raises uncertainty about the institutions that are authorized to review them. This research aims to offer an alternative review authority against all types of laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This research employed normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and historical approaches. This study stated that the alternative design of regulatory, judicial review is the unification of all judicial reviews' authority into one judicial institution. Second, separation into judicial institutions is different from the model of separation based on the order of hierarchy of legislation, based on the scope of usable power (local and national), based on legislation and non-legislation, based on the forming and separation institutions with cross-subsidy models.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"33 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132811825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-19DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58131
A. Widyawati, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Nur Rochaeti, Genjie Ompoy, Nurul Natasha Binti Muhammad Zaki
The judicial power in criminal law enforcement within the Criminal Justice System, including the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system, should be independent and self-supporting. In Indonesia, the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system is currently under the executive power that enables the practice of execution of sanctions being obstructed by many factors. In relation to that, this study explains the urgency of revision for legal structure of criminal sanctions execution and legal structure reformation for criminal enforcement in Indonesia. It employs a qualitative approach using the doctrinal research within the post-positivism paradigm. This study found that it is considered urgent or essential to reform the criminal legal structure of the national law based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects abiding to Pancasila. The criminal law system covers the criminal law enforcement system which includes material criminal law sub-system, formal criminal law sub-system, and execution of criminal sanctions sub-system. Essentially, the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system acts as a sub-system of punishment. The structural reform of the systemic law in execution of criminal sanctions sub-system should be under the auspices of judicial authority, which is the Supreme Court. Therefore, this study concludes that the system should become linear, independent, synergized, and integrated with the investigative agents, prosecutors, and courts in a single criminal law system. In this way, there will be supervision and coordination in the context of the integrality of punishment, which falls under one protection of an integrated criminal law enforcement system.
{"title":"Urgency of the Legal Structure Reformation for Law in Execution of Criminal Sanctions","authors":"A. Widyawati, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Nur Rochaeti, Genjie Ompoy, Nurul Natasha Binti Muhammad Zaki","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.58131","url":null,"abstract":"The judicial power in criminal law enforcement within the Criminal Justice System, including the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system, should be independent and self-supporting. In Indonesia, the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system is currently under the executive power that enables the practice of execution of sanctions being obstructed by many factors. In relation to that, this study explains the urgency of revision for legal structure of criminal sanctions execution and legal structure reformation for criminal enforcement in Indonesia. It employs a qualitative approach using the doctrinal research within the post-positivism paradigm. This study found that it is considered urgent or essential to reform the criminal legal structure of the national law based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects abiding to Pancasila. The criminal law system covers the criminal law enforcement system which includes material criminal law sub-system, formal criminal law sub-system, and execution of criminal sanctions sub-system. Essentially, the execution of criminal sanctions sub-system acts as a sub-system of punishment. The structural reform of the systemic law in execution of criminal sanctions sub-system should be under the auspices of judicial authority, which is the Supreme Court. Therefore, this study concludes that the system should become linear, independent, synergized, and integrated with the investigative agents, prosecutors, and courts in a single criminal law system. In this way, there will be supervision and coordination in the context of the integrality of punishment, which falls under one protection of an integrated criminal law enforcement system.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125853266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-22DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480
Ridwan Arifin
The discourse on the relationship between law and justice has long been the subject of debate and discussion ranging from philosophical to practical studies. This theme of the relationship between law and justice also gave birth to various schools of different legal thought. In fact, there is not a single school that denies that law is inseparable from justice. The difference is only when and what the measure of fairness is.1
{"title":"Capturing Various Ideas of Law and Justice in Indonesia and Global Perspective","authors":"Ridwan Arifin","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.58480","url":null,"abstract":"The discourse on the relationship between law and justice has long been the subject of debate and discussion ranging from philosophical to practical studies. This theme of the relationship between law and justice also gave birth to various schools of different legal thought. In fact, there is not a single school that denies that law is inseparable from justice. The difference is only when and what the measure of fairness is.1","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133246615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-14DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55112
Tri Sulistiyono, P. Herlambang, S. Chandra, M. Abdulaziz, Nur Arissa Izzati binti Mohamad Roki
This study seeks to examine the model of government accountability for protecting Indonesian migrant workers in China. The expected goal of this research is to make a positive contribution to the legal protection system for Indonesian migrant workers in China that is in harmony with justice and can create a sense of peace and security for Indonesian migrant workers in China. This research was carried out with an empirical juridical approach by analyzing primary data by searching for data by going directly to the field and then analyzing it with legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data observation will be carried out using field studies connected with the subject matter studied. The findings and novelties in this study indicate that migrant workers are often objects of human rights violations, such as not getting guaranteed rights and placements when the migrant workers go abroad through illegal labor suppliers. Especially in this case, the crew from Indonesia works on the Chinese ship, the Longxing Ship. This study concludes that problems related to migrant workers must get full attention and protection from the Government because it concerns the safety of Indonesian citizens. Therefore, in this case, the Tegal Regency Manpower and Transmigration Office, the Government must provide full protection to Indonesian migrant workers. In particular are crew members from Indonesia who work on Chinese ships.
{"title":"Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers in China: The Government's Role and Legal Aspects","authors":"Tri Sulistiyono, P. Herlambang, S. Chandra, M. Abdulaziz, Nur Arissa Izzati binti Mohamad Roki","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55112","url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to examine the model of government accountability for protecting Indonesian migrant workers in China. The expected goal of this research is to make a positive contribution to the legal protection system for Indonesian migrant workers in China that is in harmony with justice and can create a sense of peace and security for Indonesian migrant workers in China. This research was carried out with an empirical juridical approach by analyzing primary data by searching for data by going directly to the field and then analyzing it with legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data observation will be carried out using field studies connected with the subject matter studied. The findings and novelties in this study indicate that migrant workers are often objects of human rights violations, such as not getting guaranteed rights and placements when the migrant workers go abroad through illegal labor suppliers. Especially in this case, the crew from Indonesia works on the Chinese ship, the Longxing Ship. This study concludes that problems related to migrant workers must get full attention and protection from the Government because it concerns the safety of Indonesian citizens. Therefore, in this case, the Tegal Regency Manpower and Transmigration Office, the Government must provide full protection to Indonesian migrant workers. In particular are crew members from Indonesia who work on Chinese ships.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125895625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：