Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101558
Fernando Ortiz-Moya , Marco Reggiani
Achieving the 2030 Agenda requires comprehensive follow-up and review across all levels of government. Although local governments play a critical role in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs), their current follow-up and review architecture — conceived from a global perspective and tailored to national reporting — ignores local actors. Understanding follow-up and review as a relational process, grounded in dynamic interactions across levels, can help ensure that no place is left behind. Advancing such a system involves three key shifts: repositioning follow-up and review as a strategic governance tool, aligning global goals with local priorities, and developing context-specific indicators. Drawing on emerging local practices, we show how relational approaches bridge the gap between global ambitions and on-the-ground realities by fostering adaptive policymaking, embedding the SDGs into strategic planning, and enabling context-sensitive implementation. This approach supports a more inclusive architecture for sustainable development, rooted in the strengths and agency of local actors.
{"title":"Relational follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda: accelerating the implementation of the sustainable development goals","authors":"Fernando Ortiz-Moya , Marco Reggiani","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101558","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101558","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving the 2030 Agenda requires comprehensive follow-up and review across all levels of government. Although local governments play a critical role in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs), their current follow-up and review architecture — conceived from a global perspective and tailored to national reporting — ignores local actors. Understanding follow-up and review as a relational process, grounded in dynamic interactions across levels, can help ensure that no place is left behind. Advancing such a system involves three key shifts: repositioning follow-up and review as a strategic governance tool, aligning global goals with local priorities, and developing context-specific indicators. Drawing on emerging local practices, we show how relational approaches bridge the gap between global ambitions and on-the-ground realities by fostering adaptive policymaking, embedding the SDGs into strategic planning, and enabling context-sensitive implementation. This approach supports a more inclusive architecture for sustainable development, rooted in the strengths and agency of local actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101568
Astrid Zabel , Vong Nanhthavong , Michael Epprecht
This contribution seeks to fill knowledge gaps on what kinds of biodiversity impact investment models already exist, what factors are constraining biodiversity impact finance in the Global South, and what could be done to bridge the gap. The review identifies complexity, high transaction costs, unfamiliarity with the product, and shortages of bankable projects as key challenges pertaining to the financial sector. On the investors’ side, concerns often revolve around the risk–return ratio, insufficient global biodiversity data, and the lack of an international framework defining biodiversity finance. On the investees’ side, there is anxiety over power imbalances from the past finding their way into these new products, which could be detrimental, especially in areas with informal land rights. To move forward, learning platforms and training opportunities on impact finance could be provided to stakeholders, and more resources are needed for de-risking investments through blended financing approaches.
{"title":"Gaps between demand and supply of biodiversity impact finance in the Global South","authors":"Astrid Zabel , Vong Nanhthavong , Michael Epprecht","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This contribution seeks to fill knowledge gaps on what kinds of biodiversity impact investment models already exist, what factors are constraining biodiversity impact finance in the Global South, and what could be done to bridge the gap. The review identifies complexity, high transaction costs, unfamiliarity with the product, and shortages of bankable projects as key challenges pertaining to the financial sector. On the investors’ side, concerns often revolve around the risk–return ratio, insufficient global biodiversity data, and the lack of an international framework defining biodiversity finance. On the investees’ side, there is anxiety over power imbalances from the past finding their way into these new products, which could be detrimental, especially in areas with informal land rights. To move forward, learning platforms and training opportunities on impact finance could be provided to stakeholders, and more resources are needed for de-risking investments through blended financing approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144895401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101556
Yaohui Wang, Yang Qiu
In the current decade, civil society organizations (CSOs) have become more deeply integrated into global environmental governance networks, playing a pivotal role in addressing urgent environmental challenges. Acting as key drivers of sustainable development, CSOs navigate complex political landscapes to collaborate with government entities, even in the face of less hospitable political climates found in many Global South states. A growing body of literature has recently begun to examine the strategies that have enabled CSOs in the Global South to foster meaningful partnerships with policymakers, thereby advancing effective environmental governance. By participating in multiple stages of policy processes, namely, formulation, implementation, and supervision, Global South CSOs effectively mitigate political risks while encouraging governments to design and enforce policies aligned with global environmental values.
{"title":"How civil society organizations influence environmental governance in the Global South","authors":"Yaohui Wang, Yang Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101556","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101556","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the current decade, civil society organizations (CSOs) have become more deeply integrated into global environmental governance networks, playing a pivotal role in addressing urgent environmental challenges. Acting as key drivers of sustainable development, CSOs navigate complex political landscapes to collaborate with government entities, even in the face of less hospitable political climates found in many Global South states. A growing body of literature has recently begun to examine the strategies that have enabled CSOs in the Global South to foster meaningful partnerships with policymakers, thereby advancing effective environmental governance. By participating in multiple stages of policy processes, namely, formulation, implementation, and supervision, Global South CSOs effectively mitigate political risks while encouraging governments to design and enforce policies aligned with global environmental values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144633313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-12DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101544
Jens Christiansen , Audrey Irvine-Broque , Jessica Dempsey , Sara Nelson , Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza , Patrick Bigger , Mine Islar
Recent estimates point to dramatic increases in private capital flowing to biodiversity. Examining main sources of this increase — equity investments and debt — this review asks how biodiversity finance is being calculated, and whether private capital flowing to biodiversity action is growing as much as reported. Furthermore, by examining the literature on the standards and metrics, we ask whether these increases are likely to facilitate biodiverse outcomes. Ultimately, some growth can be ascribed to conceptual innovations in measuring biodiversity-related finance. In several cases, the dollar value represented in nominally biodiversity-related transactions does not reflect actual amounts spent on biodiversity. This review points to a risk of overestimating private financing of biodiversity targets, which may generate overconfidence in this approach. Consequently, this review argues that optimism for private capital solutions should be tempered and accompanied by an upscaling of policy alternatives and regulations that address the financial drivers of biodiversity loss.
{"title":"Off the charts? Reasons to be skeptical of the growth in biodiversity finance","authors":"Jens Christiansen , Audrey Irvine-Broque , Jessica Dempsey , Sara Nelson , Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza , Patrick Bigger , Mine Islar","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101544","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101544","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent estimates point to dramatic increases in private capital flowing to biodiversity. Examining main sources of this increase — equity investments and debt — this review asks how biodiversity finance is being calculated, and whether private capital flowing to biodiversity action is growing as much as reported. Furthermore, by examining the literature on the standards and metrics, we ask whether these increases are likely to facilitate biodiverse outcomes. Ultimately, some growth can be ascribed to conceptual innovations in measuring biodiversity-related finance. In several cases, the dollar value represented in nominally biodiversity-related transactions does not reflect actual amounts spent on biodiversity. This review points to a risk of overestimating private financing of biodiversity targets, which may generate overconfidence in this approach. Consequently, this review argues that optimism for private capital solutions should be tempered and accompanied by an upscaling of policy alternatives and regulations that address the financial drivers of biodiversity loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144606040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-04DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101553
Denise Margaret Matias , Mukona Kone , Paulina G Karim , Diana San Jose , Bryan Joel Mariano , Andrea Monica Ortiz , Pradeep K Dubey , Gino Garcia
As learning sites for sustainable development, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Biosphere Reserves (BRs) are unique sites that promote human–nature interactions in biodiversity conservation. BRs are part of a World Network of BRs, which provide opportunities for transnational collaborations. With the 50th anniversary of UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere Programme, we systematically analyzed literature on BRs in the Global South and assessed whether transnational connections emerged from the network especially in fulfilling the shared goal of being learning sites for sustainable development. We found little evidence of transnational networking between BRs in the Global South. While there are nonformal environmental education initiatives in BRs, there is a lack of reported transdisciplinary approaches and formal education about BRs in BRs. Furthermore, Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rarely integrated into initiatives. Equitable and inclusive partnerships, integration of ILK, and co-production of knowledge could be enabling factors for transdisciplinary education.
{"title":"The need for transnational networks and transdisciplinary education for sustainable development in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in the Global South","authors":"Denise Margaret Matias , Mukona Kone , Paulina G Karim , Diana San Jose , Bryan Joel Mariano , Andrea Monica Ortiz , Pradeep K Dubey , Gino Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As learning sites for sustainable development, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Biosphere Reserves (BRs) are unique sites that promote human–nature interactions in biodiversity conservation. BRs are part of a World Network of BRs, which provide opportunities for transnational collaborations. With the 50th anniversary of UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere Programme, we systematically analyzed literature on BRs in the Global South and assessed whether transnational connections emerged from the network especially in fulfilling the shared goal of being learning sites for sustainable development. We found little evidence of transnational networking between BRs in the Global South. While there are nonformal environmental education initiatives in BRs, there is a lack of reported transdisciplinary approaches and formal education about BRs in BRs. Furthermore, Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rarely integrated into initiatives. Equitable and inclusive partnerships, integration of ILK, and co-production of knowledge could be enabling factors for transdisciplinary education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144548478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Circular economy (CE) practices significantly enhance financial performance by increasing resource efficiency, reducing costs, and bolstering corporate reputation. By reducing waste and maximizing resource use, companies can decrease costs and improve operational efficiency, thus directly enhancing their financial health. CE practices such as emission reduction and resource recycling not only lower production costs but also mitigate regulatory and environmental liabilities, leading to a direct decrease in credit risk and an improvement in corporate financial stability. Within this frame, the integration of digital technologies has transformed traditional business models into more agile and efficient circular e-business models. These advancements facilitate real-time resource flow optimization, scaling CE practices effectively across global supply chains, thereby enhancing companies’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and reducing their credit risk by lowering default probability. Moreover, government structures and firm characteristics like size and ownership significantly influence the effectiveness of CE practices. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises often face unique challenges in implementing CE due to their concentrated ownership structures and short-term needs. However, strong governance frameworks can help overcome these barriers by ensuring robust resource management and fostering a culture of sustainability. In conclusion, by adopting CE strategies, such as waste reduction, product life extension, and closed-loop supply chains, firms can significantly enhance their ESG profiles, increasing investor confidence and lowering the cost of capital. Companies with high circularity scores, reflecting comprehensive adherence to CE principles and strong ESG performance, have been shown to have a reduced default probability compared to less sustainable counterparts.
{"title":"The role of circular economy in reducing corporate default probability: insights from recent research","authors":"Beatrice Bertelli , Ulpiana Kocollari , Laura Merzi , Costanza Torricelli","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circular economy (CE) practices significantly enhance financial performance by increasing resource efficiency, reducing costs, and bolstering corporate reputation. By reducing waste and maximizing resource use, companies can decrease costs and improve operational efficiency, thus directly enhancing their financial health. CE practices such as emission reduction and resource recycling not only lower production costs but also mitigate regulatory and environmental liabilities, leading to a direct decrease in credit risk and an improvement in corporate financial stability. Within this frame, the integration of digital technologies has transformed traditional business models into more agile and efficient circular e-business models. These advancements facilitate real-time resource flow optimization, scaling CE practices effectively across global supply chains, thereby enhancing companies’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and reducing their credit risk by lowering default probability. Moreover, government structures and firm characteristics like size and ownership significantly influence the effectiveness of CE practices. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises often face unique challenges in implementing CE due to their concentrated ownership structures and short-term needs. However, strong governance frameworks can help overcome these barriers by ensuring robust resource management and fostering a culture of sustainability. In conclusion, by adopting CE strategies, such as waste reduction, product life extension, and closed-loop supply chains, firms can significantly enhance their ESG profiles, increasing investor confidence and lowering the cost of capital. Companies with high circularity scores, reflecting comprehensive adherence to CE principles and strong ESG performance, have been shown to have a reduced default probability compared to less sustainable counterparts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101555"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-27DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101554
Robert Fletcher , Emiel de Lange , Isabel Felandro , Munib Khanyari , Omar Saif , Jocelyne Sze , Ben West
This article outlines the idea of a Basic Income for Nature and Climate (BINC) as a novel mechanism for funding biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation activities. This proposal responds to two important empirical developments. The first concerns growing discussions around cash transfer programs and universal basic income within international development discussions. While these are increasingly implemented or piloted, they do not usually take into account environmental issues including biodiversity conservation. The second relates to market-based instruments like payments for ecosystem services and REDD+ (reduced emissions through avoided deforestation and forest degradation). In practice, these programs have commonly failed to halt biodiversity loss and alleviate poverty. The BINC proposal aims to integrate and transcend these existing mechanisms as part of a broader program of transformative change in conservation policy and practice that foregrounds concerns for social justice and equity.
{"title":"Cash for conservation? Integrating basic income support into biodiversity and climate finance","authors":"Robert Fletcher , Emiel de Lange , Isabel Felandro , Munib Khanyari , Omar Saif , Jocelyne Sze , Ben West","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article outlines the idea of a Basic Income for Nature and Climate (BINC) as a novel mechanism for funding biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation activities. This proposal responds to two important empirical developments. The first concerns growing discussions around cash transfer programs and universal basic income within international development discussions. While these are increasingly implemented or piloted, they do not usually take into account environmental issues including biodiversity conservation. The second relates to market-based instruments like payments for ecosystem services and REDD+ (reduced emissions through avoided deforestation and forest degradation). In practice, these programs have commonly failed to halt biodiversity loss and alleviate poverty. The BINC proposal aims to integrate and transcend these existing mechanisms as part of a broader program of transformative change in conservation policy and practice that foregrounds concerns for social justice and equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101554"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144489944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-10DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101543
Camilla Sandström , Irina Mancheva , Hjalmar Laudon
Addressing the intertwined challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change requires rapid, intentional societal shifts. UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs), established as interdisciplinary learning hubs for sustainable development, offer significant potential to bridge global commitments and local action. However, their effectiveness is hampered by structural, institutional, and perceptional/ideational challenges. This review identifies and categorizes these challenges, highlighting issues such as socioeconomic inequalities, governance constraints, and narrative complexities. Our analysis of 42 recent studies reveals that while BRs could serve as ‘living labs’ for transformative change, their impact is limited by these challenges. There are numerous indications that the development of BRs is at a critical juncture. If the identified challenges are not addressed, there is a risk that the role of BRs will be marginalized in the future, rather than evolving into key arenas that contribute to the transformative change we urgently need.
{"title":"Unlocking the potential of biosphere reserves: a review of structural, institutional, and ideational challenges to transformational learning","authors":"Camilla Sandström , Irina Mancheva , Hjalmar Laudon","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101543","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101543","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing the intertwined challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change requires rapid, intentional societal shifts. UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs), established as interdisciplinary learning hubs for sustainable development, offer significant potential to bridge global commitments and local action. However, their effectiveness is hampered by structural, institutional, and perceptional/ideational challenges. This review identifies and categorizes these challenges, highlighting issues such as socioeconomic inequalities, governance constraints, and narrative complexities. Our analysis of 42 recent studies reveals that while BRs could serve as ‘living labs’ for transformative change, their impact is limited by these challenges. There are numerous indications that the development of BRs is at a critical juncture. If the identified challenges are not addressed, there is a risk that the role of BRs will be marginalized in the future, rather than evolving into key arenas that contribute to the transformative change we urgently need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101543"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144254997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-28DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101540
Jesse Schrage , Subina Shrestha
City networks have become important platforms in urban climate governance, widely recognised for facilitating collaboration and mutual learning among municipalities. A wide literature now recognises how governing climate change in cities depends on collaborations within and across different sites. Yet, as city collaboration through networks has expanded, there remains much ambiguity over the strategic value — or what we term the functions — of these networks for member cities. In this paper, we draw on insights from the literature on urban climate governance to scrutinise the interactions and roles taken in and by city networks. We review how their functions in local climate governance have been conceptualised and analyse how these are evolving. While effective climate governance requires coordination and cooperation to foster collective action, we argue that clarifying the distinct functions that networks perform also reveals important challenges for local climate action.
{"title":"What functions for city networks in local climate governance? Conceptualising cross-site interactions as learning, moulding and steering","authors":"Jesse Schrage , Subina Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101540","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101540","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>City networks have become important platforms in urban climate governance, widely recognised for facilitating collaboration and mutual learning among municipalities. A wide literature now recognises how governing climate change in cities depends on collaborations within and across different sites. Yet, as city collaboration through networks has expanded, there remains much ambiguity over the strategic value — or what we term the functions — of these networks for member cities. In this paper, we draw on insights from the literature on urban climate governance to scrutinise the interactions and roles taken in and by city networks. We review how their functions in local climate governance have been conceptualised and analyse how these are evolving. While effective climate governance requires coordination and cooperation to foster collective action, we argue that clarifying the distinct functions that networks perform also reveals important challenges for local climate action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101540"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144147980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-27DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101541
Jesper Svensson, Julia Mao, Nils Droste
Tackling biodiversity loss requires not only scaling up financial resources but also improving the governance of how such resources are mobilized, allocated, and accounted for. This paper reviews recent peer-reviewed literature (2019–2023) on biodiversity finance governance, focusing on three interrelated themes: financial instruments and mechanisms, governance structures, and critical and normative perspectives on biodiversity finance. Across these themes, we identify property rights as a key yet underexplored issue. Property rights shape who can access, control, and benefit from biodiversity-related finance. By synthesizing current research, we show how questions of ownership, access, and responsibility are central to the governance of biodiversity finance and propose that the politics of property rights constitutes a critical research frontier in this emerging field.
{"title":"What do we (not) know about biodiversity finance governance?","authors":"Jesper Svensson, Julia Mao, Nils Droste","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101541","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101541","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tackling biodiversity loss requires not only scaling up financial resources but also improving the governance of how such resources are mobilized, allocated, and accounted for. This paper reviews recent peer-reviewed literature (2019–2023) on biodiversity finance governance, focusing on three interrelated themes: financial instruments and mechanisms, governance structures, and critical and normative perspectives on biodiversity finance. Across these themes, we identify property rights as a key yet underexplored issue. Property rights shape who can access, control, and benefit from biodiversity-related finance. By synthesizing current research, we show how questions of ownership, access, and responsibility are central to the governance of biodiversity finance and propose that the politics of property rights constitutes a critical research frontier in this emerging field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101541"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144147981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号