首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Advancing Integrative Oncology: The Society for Integrative Oncology Education Committee's Journey and Vision. 推进中西医结合肿瘤学:中西医结合肿瘤学会教育委员会的历程与愿景。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0664
Ting Bao, Gabriel Lopez, Terri Crudup, Ana Maria Lopez, Channing J Paller, Krisstina Gowin, Ashwin Mehta, Claudia M Witt, Suzanna M Zick, Lynda G Balneaves
{"title":"Advancing Integrative Oncology: The Society for Integrative Oncology Education Committee's Journey and Vision.","authors":"Ting Bao, Gabriel Lopez, Terri Crudup, Ana Maria Lopez, Channing J Paller, Krisstina Gowin, Ashwin Mehta, Claudia M Witt, Suzanna M Zick, Lynda G Balneaves","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0664","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0664","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trait Mindfulness Moderates Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mantram Repetition Program for Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. 针对创伤后应激障碍退伍军人的曼特拉姆重复计划随机对照试验中的特质正念调节治疗效果。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0181
Skylar Kelsven, Caitlin L McLean, Kiara Widjanarko, Jill E Bormann, Ariel J Lang

Objectives: This secondary analysis examined five facets of mindful awareness as potential moderators of clinical outcomes using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared Mantram Repetition Program (MRP) with present-centered therapy (PCT) in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Data were examined from 173 veterans with military-related PTSD randomly assigned to receive eight sessions of MRP (n = 89) or PCT (n = 84). Clinician-administered and self-report measures of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), PTSD severity, insomnia symptoms, and depression symptoms, and were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Hierarchical regressions were used to test for FFMQ moderation on clinical outcomes within the two treatment groups. Results: For those with greater ability to "describe their internal experience" (+1 standard deviation [SD]), MRP was associated with lower PTSD hyperarousal symptoms post-intervention than PCT (p < 0.001). For those with lower "nonreactivity to internal stimuli" (-1 SD), MRP was associated with greater reductions in PTSD avoidance and numbing symptoms and insomnia compared with PCT (all ps < 0.002). Conclusions: Pre-intervention mindfulness domains of "describe" and "nonreactivity to inner experience" differentially predicted improvements in PTSD and insomnia symptoms for MRP as compared with PCT subjects. The FFMQ may be an important tool for predicting patient preparedness for mindfulness-based interventions, such as MRP.

研究目的这项二次分析利用一项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,研究了作为临床结果潜在调节因素的正念意识的五个方面,该试验对患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人进行了曼特拉姆重复程序(MRP)与现在中心疗法(PCT)的比较。研究方法对 173 名患有军事相关创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人的数据进行了研究,这些退伍军人被随机分配接受八次 MRP(89 人)或 PCT(84 人)治疗。在干预前和干预后,对正念(五面正念问卷 [FFMQ])、创伤后应激障碍严重程度、失眠症状和抑郁症状进行了临床医生管理和自我报告测量。使用层次回归法检验了 FFMQ 对两个治疗组临床结果的调节作用。结果显示对于 "描述内心体验 "能力较强(+1 标准差 [SD])的患者,MRP 与干预后创伤后应激障碍过度焦虑症状的相关性低于 PCT(P < 0.001)。对于那些 "对内部刺激无反应"(-1 标准差)较低的人来说,与 PCT 相比,MRP 与创伤后应激障碍的回避和麻木症状以及失眠症状的减少幅度更大相关(所有 ps 均 < 0.002)。结论干预前的 "描述 "和 "对内心体验不反应 "正念领域与PCT受试者相比,对MRP受试者创伤后应激障碍和失眠症状的改善具有不同的预测作用。FFMQ可能是预测患者是否准备好接受正念干预(如MRP)的重要工具。
{"title":"Trait Mindfulness Moderates Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mantram Repetition Program for Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Skylar Kelsven, Caitlin L McLean, Kiara Widjanarko, Jill E Bormann, Ariel J Lang","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0181","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This secondary analysis examined five facets of mindful awareness as potential moderators of clinical outcomes using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared Mantram Repetition Program (MRP) with present-centered therapy (PCT) in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were examined from 173 veterans with military-related PTSD randomly assigned to receive eight sessions of MRP (<i>n</i> = 89) or PCT (<i>n</i> = 84). Clinician-administered and self-report measures of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), PTSD severity, insomnia symptoms, and depression symptoms, and were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Hierarchical regressions were used to test for FFMQ moderation on clinical outcomes within the two treatment groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For those with greater ability to \"describe their internal experience\" (+1 standard deviation [SD]), MRP was associated with lower PTSD hyperarousal symptoms post-intervention than PCT (<i>p</i> < 0.001). For those with lower \"nonreactivity to internal stimuli\" (-1 SD), MRP was associated with greater reductions in PTSD avoidance and numbing symptoms and insomnia compared with PCT (all <i>p</i>s < 0.002). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pre-intervention mindfulness domains of \"describe\" and \"nonreactivity to inner experience\" differentially predicted improvements in PTSD and insomnia symptoms for MRP as compared with PCT subjects. The FFMQ may be an important tool for predicting patient preparedness for mindfulness-based interventions, such as MRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of the Brief Simha Kriya Breathing Practice for Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. 在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医护人员进行简短 Simha Kriya 呼吸练习的效果。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0692
Richard W Wagner, Smitha Mallaiah, Clark R Anderson, Rosalinda Engle, Varsha Vasu, Eduardo Bruera, Balachundar Subramaniam, Lorenzo Cohen, Santhosshi Narayanan

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) experienced increased anxiety, depression, loneliness, and other mental health issues. HCWs need additional resources to cope with the mental health impact of their work. Yoga techniques could be helpful strategies to manage different stressors during times of uncertainty. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, trial examined the effects of a brief pranayama yoga practice on the wellbeing of HCWs during the height of COVID-19. HCWs were recruited through announcements and institutional websites at a large major cancer center in the southern United States. A short, prerecorded, 5-min breathwork video intervention called "Simha Kriya" was provided to participants, and they were encouraged to practice one to two times daily for 4 weeks. Participants completed self-report instruments at baseline and weeks 1 and 4, including: (1) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (2) Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); and (3) a questionnaire assessing the experience of COVID-19 among HCWs that had five subscales. HCWs also conducted a measure of breath holding time. Paired sample t-tests and mixed-effects analysis of variance models examined changes over time. Results: One hundred participants consented to the study, with 88 female, 60 white, 39 worked remotely, and 27 were clinical staff. Sixty-nine participants provided data at week 1 and 56 at week 4. Participants' adherence to the breathing exercises between weeks 1 and 4 was similar, with a mean of six times per week. At week 4, there were significant decreases in the COVID-19 Distress score (p < 0.0001) and COVID-19 Disruption (p = 0.013), yet no changes in the PSS. There were also significant increases in COVID-19 Stress Management (p = 0.0001) and BRCS scores (p = 0.012), but no changes in Perceived Benefits of COVID-19 and no changes in breath holding time. Discussion: Brief yoga-based breathing practices helped reduce pandemic-specific stress, improved resilience, and stress management skills in HCWs. Trial Registration Number: NCT04482647.

导言:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员(HCWs)经历了更多的焦虑、抑郁、孤独和其他心理健康问题。医护人员需要额外的资源来应对其工作对心理健康的影响。瑜伽技巧可能是在不确定时期管理不同压力的有用策略。方法这项前瞻性单臂试验研究了在 COVID-19 高峰期,简短的调息瑜伽练习对高危产妇健康的影响。医护人员是通过美国南部一家大型癌症中心的公告和机构网站招募的。向参与者提供了一个名为 "Simha Kriya "的简短、预先录制的 5 分钟呼吸练习视频,并鼓励他们在 4 周内每天练习 1 到 2 次。参与者在基线、第 1 周和第 4 周时填写自我报告工具,包括:(1)感知压力量表(PSS);(2)简明弹性应对量表(BRCS);(3)评估 HCW 对 COVID-19 的体验的问卷,其中包含五个分量表。医护人员还进行了憋气时间测量。配对样本 t 检验和混合效应方差分析模型检验了随着时间推移而发生的变化。研究结果100 名参与者同意参与研究,其中 88 人为女性,60 人为白人,39 人为远程工作,27 人为临床工作人员。69名参与者提供了第1周的数据,56名参与者提供了第4周的数据。参与者在第 1 周和第 4 周坚持呼吸练习的情况相似,平均每周 6 次。第 4 周时,COVID-19 痛苦评分显著下降(p p = 0.013),但 PSS 没有变化。COVID-19 压力管理(p = 0.0001)和 BRCS 分数(p = 0.012)也有明显增加,但 COVID-19 的感知益处没有变化,憋气时间也没有变化。讨论以瑜伽为基础的简短呼吸练习有助于减轻大流行病特有的压力,提高高危工作者的抗压能力和压力管理技能。试验注册号:NCT04482647:NCT04482647。
{"title":"Effects of the Brief Simha Kriya Breathing Practice for Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Richard W Wagner, Smitha Mallaiah, Clark R Anderson, Rosalinda Engle, Varsha Vasu, Eduardo Bruera, Balachundar Subramaniam, Lorenzo Cohen, Santhosshi Narayanan","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0692","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) experienced increased anxiety, depression, loneliness, and other mental health issues. HCWs need additional resources to cope with the mental health impact of their work. Yoga techniques could be helpful strategies to manage different stressors during times of uncertainty. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective, single-arm, trial examined the effects of a brief pranayama yoga practice on the wellbeing of HCWs during the height of COVID-19. HCWs were recruited through announcements and institutional websites at a large major cancer center in the southern United States. A short, prerecorded, 5-min breathwork video intervention called \"Simha Kriya\" was provided to participants, and they were encouraged to practice one to two times daily for 4 weeks. Participants completed self-report instruments at baseline and weeks 1 and 4, including: (1) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (2) Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); and (3) a questionnaire assessing the experience of COVID-19 among HCWs that had five subscales. HCWs also conducted a measure of breath holding time. Paired sample <i>t</i>-tests and mixed-effects analysis of variance models examined changes over time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred participants consented to the study, with 88 female, 60 white, 39 worked remotely, and 27 were clinical staff. Sixty-nine participants provided data at week 1 and 56 at week 4. Participants' adherence to the breathing exercises between weeks 1 and 4 was similar, with a mean of six times per week. At week 4, there were significant decreases in the COVID-19 Distress score (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and COVID-19 Disruption (<i>p</i> = 0.013), yet no changes in the PSS. There were also significant increases in COVID-19 Stress Management (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and BRCS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.012), but no changes in Perceived Benefits of COVID-19 and no changes in breath holding time. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Brief yoga-based breathing practices helped reduce pandemic-specific stress, improved resilience, and stress management skills in HCWs. <b>Trial Registration Number:</b> NCT04482647.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140307130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy Versus Celecoxib in Patients with Thoracodorsal Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 超声引导下针刺术与塞来昔布治疗胸背肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0490
Zhou Yanling, Lingxiang Hong, Chao Wang, Yong Nie, Yingzong Xiong, Zhiwen Zheng, Junchen Zhu

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy (UgA) for the treatment of thoracodorsal myofascial pain syndrome (TDMPS) and monitor its mid-term efficacy at 3 months after treatment. Methods: A 3-week, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted among 100 patients with TDMPS (visual analogue scale [VAS] score > 3) in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Orthopaedics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with a 3-month follow-up starting after completion of treatment. These patients were randomly assigned to receive UgA (n = 50) or oral celecoxib (n = 50). Recruitment was conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome was the VAS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. Outcome data were collected at baseline, week 3 (post-treatment) and week 15 (follow-up). Results: Compared with that in the celecoxib group, the pain in the UgA group was alleviated more strongly, with an adjusted mean group difference of -0.69 (95% CI,-1.07 to -0.31 after multiple imputation) at week 3 and -1.96 (95% CI,-2.33 to -1.59 after multiple imputation) at week 15 (p < 0.001 for overall group × time interaction). Both groups exhibited improvements in the ODI and PASS scores at weeks 3 and 15, but these improvements were significantly greater in the UgA group (p < 0.05). At week 3, the TNF-α and IL-1 levels were significantly lower in both groups, but celecoxib was more effective (p < 0.05). Results from analyses with multilevel multiple imputation for missingness were similar. Conclusion: UgA led to greater and safer alleviation of pain, dysfunction, and pain anxiety in patients treated with TDMPS than did celecoxib and had a durable 3-month efficacy but was inferior to celecoxib in reducing the level of inflammatory factors. These findings may prompt clinicians to recommend UgA as an alternative and supplementary therapy for pain management in patients with TDMPS.

目的评估超声引导下穴位切开术(UgA)治疗胸背肌筋膜疼痛综合征(TDMPS)的有效性和安全性,并监测治疗后 3 个月的中期疗效。研究方法在安徽中医药大学第二附属医院骨科门诊对100名TDMPS患者(视觉模拟量表[VAS]评分大于3分)进行为期3周、由评估者盲法的随机临床试验,并在治疗结束后进行为期3个月的随访。这些患者被随机分配接受UgA(50人)或口服塞来昔布(50人)治疗。招募时间为2021年1月至2022年7月。主要结果为VAS评分,次要结果包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS)以及TNF-α和IL-1β水平。结果数据收集于基线、第 3 周(治疗后)和第 15 周(随访)。结果与塞来昔布组相比,UgA组的疼痛得到了更大程度的缓解,第3周时调整后的平均组间差异为-0.69(多重归因后的95% CI为-1.07至-0.31),第15周时调整后的平均组间差异为-1.96(多重归因后的95% CI为-2.33至-1.59)(总体组与时间的交互作用P < 0.001)。两组患者在第3周和第15周的ODI和PASS评分均有所改善,但UgA组的改善幅度更大(P<0.05)。第 3 周时,两组的 TNF-α 和 IL-1 水平均显著降低,但塞来昔布的疗效更好(P < 0.05)。采用多层次多重估算缺失率的分析结果相似。结论:与塞来昔布相比,UgA能更大程度、更安全地缓解接受TDMPS治疗的患者的疼痛、功能障碍和疼痛焦虑,并具有3个月的持久疗效,但在降低炎症因子水平方面不如塞来昔布。这些研究结果可能会促使临床医生推荐将乌卡作为 TDMPS 患者疼痛治疗的替代和辅助疗法。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy Versus Celecoxib in Patients with Thoracodorsal Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zhou Yanling, Lingxiang Hong, Chao Wang, Yong Nie, Yingzong Xiong, Zhiwen Zheng, Junchen Zhu","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0490","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy (UgA) for the treatment of thoracodorsal myofascial pain syndrome (TDMPS) and monitor its mid-term efficacy at 3 months after treatment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 3-week, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted among 100 patients with TDMPS (visual analogue scale [VAS] score > 3) in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Orthopaedics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with a 3-month follow-up starting after completion of treatment. These patients were randomly assigned to receive UgA (<i>n</i> = 50) or oral celecoxib (<i>n</i> = 50). Recruitment was conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome was the VAS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. Outcome data were collected at baseline, week 3 (post-treatment) and week 15 (follow-up). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with that in the celecoxib group, the pain in the UgA group was alleviated more strongly, with an adjusted mean group difference of -0.69 (95% CI,-1.07 to -0.31 after multiple imputation) at week 3 and -1.96 (95% CI,-2.33 to -1.59 after multiple imputation) at week 15 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for overall group × time interaction). Both groups exhibited improvements in the ODI and PASS scores at weeks 3 and 15, but these improvements were significantly greater in the UgA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At week 3, the TNF-α and IL-1 levels were significantly lower in both groups, but celecoxib was more effective (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Results from analyses with multilevel multiple imputation for missingness were similar. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> UgA led to greater and safer alleviation of pain, dysfunction, and pain anxiety in patients treated with TDMPS than did celecoxib and had a durable 3-month efficacy but was inferior to celecoxib in reducing the level of inflammatory factors. These findings may prompt clinicians to recommend UgA as an alternative and supplementary therapy for pain management in patients with TDMPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustainable Health Care: How Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Could Lead the Shift Towards Eco-Friendly Practices. 可持续的医疗保健:传统医学、辅助医学和整合医学如何引领向生态友好型实践的转变。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0754
Holger Cramer
{"title":"Sustainable Health Care: How Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Could Lead the Shift Towards Eco-Friendly Practices.","authors":"Holger Cramer","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0754","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0754","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Small Observational Study of Battlefield Acupuncture for Homeless-Experienced Veterans. 针对无家可归退伍军人的战场针灸小型观察研究。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0749
Jack Tsai, Hind A Beydoun, Alexandra Howard, Cathy St Pierre

Background: Homeless-experienced veterans (HEVs) are an important but challenging group to care for in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system, and there are opportunities to examine the potential of integrative and complementary medicine approaches. Methods: This observational study enrolled 33 HEVs in a one-group observational, prospective study of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) with a monthly follow-up for 3 months after initiating BFA. Results: Linear growth curve analyses revealed a significant improvement in overall pain scores and scores on the effects of pain on activity level, mood, and stress. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest the potential of BFA to improve pain among HEVs as an area for further research.

背景:无家可归的退伍军人(HEVs)是美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中一个重要但具有挑战性的护理群体,我们有机会研究综合和补充医学方法的潜力。研究方法这项观察性研究招募了 33 名退伍军人参加战场针灸(BFA)的单组观察性前瞻性研究,并在开始接受战场针灸治疗后的 3 个月内每月进行一次随访。研究结果线性增长曲线分析显示,总体疼痛评分以及疼痛对活动水平、情绪和压力的影响评分均有显著改善。结论:这些初步研究结果表明,BFA 有可能改善高血压患者的疼痛,是一个有待进一步研究的领域。
{"title":"Small Observational Study of Battlefield Acupuncture for Homeless-Experienced Veterans.","authors":"Jack Tsai, Hind A Beydoun, Alexandra Howard, Cathy St Pierre","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0749","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Homeless-experienced veterans (HEVs) are an important but challenging group to care for in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system, and there are opportunities to examine the potential of integrative and complementary medicine approaches. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This observational study enrolled 33 HEVs in a one-group observational, prospective study of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) with a monthly follow-up for 3 months after initiating BFA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Linear growth curve analyses revealed a significant improvement in overall pain scores and scores on the effects of pain on activity level, mood, and stress. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These preliminary findings suggest the potential of BFA to improve pain among HEVs as an area for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Restless Legs Syndrome in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Randomized-Controlled Trial at Hospital-Based Hemodialysis Center. 针灸治疗终末期肾病患者不安腿综合征的有效性和安全性:医院血液透析中心的随机对照试验》。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0791
Jia-Ming Chen, Chia-Chu Chang, Ya-Lun Li, Ping-Fang Chiu, John Y Chiang, Po-Chi Hsu, Lun-Chien Lo

Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is frequent in patients with hemodialysis (HD) and occurs predominantly in its most severe forms. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for RLS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at hospital-based HD center. Methods: This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with HD and RLS who were randomly assigned to the experimental group and control group. Data were collected using the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and heart rate variability (HRV) records at baseline, after the therapeutic course (12 times/4 weeks), and 1-week follow-up. Result: A total of 47 patients were evaluated with IRLSRS score from 11 to 30 in this study. There were 41 patients enrolled in the study based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and allocated randomly into two groups. A total of 35 participants completed the trial, including 18 subjects in the experimental group and 17 subjects in the control group. The comparison of IRLSRS and ISI showed a significant reduction between two groups after acupuncture treatment (p = 0.002, p = 0.003). The ISI after 1-week follow-up also revealed significant decrease (p = 0.003). This HRV results showed that high frequency (HF%) increased significantly (p = 0.021) and low frequency (LF%) decreased significantly in the acupuncture group (p = 0.021). The generalized estimating equation showed that the IRLSRS improved by 2.902 points (p < 0.001) in the acupuncture group compared with the control group and by 1.340 points (p = 0.003) after 1-week follow-up. There were no adverse effects observed during HD in this study. Discussion: The authors conclude that acupuncture could effectively improve the symptoms of RLS significantly. The results from this study provide clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture to treat the patients with RLS at the HD center.

背景:不宁腿综合征(RLS)是血液透析(HD)患者的常见病,主要以最严重的形式出现。本研究旨在评估针灸治疗终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的有效性和安全性。研究方法这项单盲随机对照试验的对象是患有 HD 并伴有 RLS 的患者,他们被随机分配到实验组和对照组。在基线期、疗程结束后(12 次/4 周)和随访 1 周时,使用国际不宁腿综合征评分量表(IRLSRS)、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和心率变异性(HRV)记录收集数据。结果本研究共评估了 47 名 IRLSRS 得分为 11 至 30 分的患者。根据纳入/排除标准,41 名患者被纳入研究,并被随机分配到两组。共有 35 人完成了试验,其中实验组 18 人,对照组 17 人。针灸治疗后,两组的 IRLSRS 和 ISI 比较结果显示,实验组和对照组的 IRLSRS 和 ISI 均显著下降(P = 0.002,P = 0.003)。随访 1 周后,ISI 也有明显下降(p = 0.003)。心率变异结果显示,针灸组的高频(HF%)显著增加(p = 0.021),低频(LF%)显著减少(p = 0.021)。广义估计方程显示,与对照组相比,针刺组的 IRLSRS 改善了 2.902 点(p < 0.001),随访 1 周后改善了 1.340 点(p = 0.003)。本研究中未观察到 HD 期间的不良反应。讨论:作者得出结论:针灸能有效改善 RLS 的症状。本研究的结果为针灸治疗血液透析中心的 RLS 患者的有效性和安全性提供了临床证据。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Restless Legs Syndrome in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Randomized-Controlled Trial at Hospital-Based Hemodialysis Center.","authors":"Jia-Ming Chen, Chia-Chu Chang, Ya-Lun Li, Ping-Fang Chiu, John Y Chiang, Po-Chi Hsu, Lun-Chien Lo","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0791","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is frequent in patients with hemodialysis (HD) and occurs predominantly in its most severe forms. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for RLS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at hospital-based HD center. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with HD and RLS who were randomly assigned to the experimental group and control group. Data were collected using the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and heart rate variability (HRV) records at baseline, after the therapeutic course (12 times/4 weeks), and 1-week follow-up. <b><i>Result:</i></b> A total of 47 patients were evaluated with IRLSRS score from 11 to 30 in this study. There were 41 patients enrolled in the study based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and allocated randomly into two groups. A total of 35 participants completed the trial, including 18 subjects in the experimental group and 17 subjects in the control group. The comparison of IRLSRS and ISI showed a significant reduction between two groups after acupuncture treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>p</i> = 0.003). The ISI after 1-week follow-up also revealed significant decrease (<i>p</i> = 0.003). This HRV results showed that high frequency (HF%) increased significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and low frequency (LF%) decreased significantly in the acupuncture group (<i>p</i> = 0.021). The generalized estimating equation showed that the IRLSRS improved by 2.902 points (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the acupuncture group compared with the control group and by 1.340 points (<i>p</i> = 0.003) after 1-week follow-up. There were no adverse effects observed during HD in this study. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The authors conclude that acupuncture could effectively improve the symptoms of RLS significantly. The results from this study provide clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture to treat the patients with RLS at the HD center.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acupoint Sensitivity in Health and Disease: A Systematic Review. 健康与疾病中的穴位敏感性:系统综述。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0204
EunMee Yang, Weidong Lu, Dennis Muñoz-Vergara, Esme Goldfinger, Ted J Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Andrew C Ahn, Peter M Wayne

Introduction: The concept of acupoints is a key defining feature of acupuncture, yet the scientific basis of acupoints remains unclear. In recent years, there has been an emerging body of animal studies demonstrating an association between cutaneous sensitivity and visceral pathophysiology, through which acupoints over the skin are sensitized in pathologic conditions. Several studies with humans have also been conducted to assess whether the sensitivity of acupoints is distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, no systematic review has been conducted to collate and synthesize the status and quality of human studies on this topic. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Literature search was performed by combining variations of search terms related to acupoints and pain sensitivity in PubMed, EMBASE, and Alt HealthWatch (EBSCOHost). Screening of titles and abstracts and review of full-text articles for eligibility were performed by two independent investigators. Using a predefined template, information on subject characteristics, pathologic conditions, names of assessed acupoints, and relevant main findings were extracted from the included studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies. A quality assessment checklist was also developed by the present authors to examine the quality of reporting of experimental variables that were considered important for evaluating acupoint sensitivity. Results: A total of 3453 studies were identified from the database search, of which 11 met the eligibility criteria to be included in this review. Six studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of body acupoints, and the remaining five studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of auricular points. Overall, findings suggest that the sensitivity of acupoints may be distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, there were various potential sources of bias and substantial heterogeneity across included studies in clinical conditions and acupoints. Conclusion: There is at present insufficient evidence to support or refute that acupoints in humans are sensitized in pathologic conditions. There were various methodological issues, including small sample size and poor reporting of experimental design and variables, which limit the ability to draw a definitive conclusion on this topic. It is also largely unclear whether it is the general body regions rather than specific acupoints that may be sensitized, as most studies did not include nonacupoint location(s) for comparison. Thus, further rigorous research is warranted.

导言:穴位概念是针灸的一个重要特征,但穴位的科学依据仍不明确。近年来,越来越多的动物实验表明,皮肤敏感性与内脏病理生理之间存在关联,在病理情况下,皮肤上的穴位会产生敏感性。此外,还对人类进行了多项研究,以评估健康人群与临床人群的穴位敏感性是否存在差异。然而,目前还没有系统性的综述来整理和归纳有关这一主题的人类研究的现状和质量。研究方法根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)进行了系统综述。在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Alt HealthWatch(EBSCOHost)中结合与穴位和疼痛敏感性相关的不同检索词进行文献检索。由两名独立调查人员筛选标题和摘要,并审查全文是否合格。使用预定义模板,从纳入的研究中提取受试者特征、病理条件、评估穴位名称和相关主要结论等信息。纳入研究的方法学质量采用针对病例对照研究的修订版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。本文作者还制定了一份质量评估核对表,以检查被认为对评估穴位敏感性很重要的实验变量的报告质量。结果:通过数据库搜索共发现了 3453 项研究,其中 11 项符合纳入本综述的资格标准。其中六项研究考察了体表穴位的机械敏感性,其余五项研究考察了耳穴的机械敏感性。总体而言,研究结果表明,穴位的敏感性在健康人群和临床人群中可能有所不同。然而,在临床条件和穴位方面,纳入的研究存在各种潜在的偏差来源和大量异质性。结论目前还没有足够的证据支持或反驳人体穴位在病理情况下具有敏感性。研究中存在各种方法问题,包括样本量小、实验设计和变量报告不完善等,这些问题限制了就这一主题得出明确结论的能力。此外,由于大多数研究都没有将非穴位位置作为比较对象,因此还不清楚是否是全身区域而非特定穴位可能会过敏。因此,有必要进行进一步的严格研究。
{"title":"Acupoint Sensitivity in Health and Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"EunMee Yang, Weidong Lu, Dennis Muñoz-Vergara, Esme Goldfinger, Ted J Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Andrew C Ahn, Peter M Wayne","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0204","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The concept of acupoints is a key defining feature of acupuncture, yet the scientific basis of acupoints remains unclear. In recent years, there has been an emerging body of animal studies demonstrating an association between cutaneous sensitivity and visceral pathophysiology, through which acupoints over the skin are sensitized in pathologic conditions. Several studies with humans have also been conducted to assess whether the sensitivity of acupoints is distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, no systematic review has been conducted to collate and synthesize the status and quality of human studies on this topic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Literature search was performed by combining variations of search terms related to acupoints and pain sensitivity in PubMed, EMBASE, and Alt HealthWatch (EBSCOHost). Screening of titles and abstracts and review of full-text articles for eligibility were performed by two independent investigators. Using a predefined template, information on subject characteristics, pathologic conditions, names of assessed acupoints, and relevant main findings were extracted from the included studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies. A quality assessment checklist was also developed by the present authors to examine the quality of reporting of experimental variables that were considered important for evaluating acupoint sensitivity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 3453 studies were identified from the database search, of which 11 met the eligibility criteria to be included in this review. Six studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of body acupoints, and the remaining five studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of auricular points. Overall, findings suggest that the sensitivity of acupoints may be distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, there were various potential sources of bias and substantial heterogeneity across included studies in clinical conditions and acupoints. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is at present insufficient evidence to support or refute that acupoints in humans are sensitized in pathologic conditions. There were various methodological issues, including small sample size and poor reporting of experimental design and variables, which limit the ability to draw a definitive conclusion on this topic. It is also largely unclear whether it is the general body regions rather than specific acupoints that may be sensitized, as most studies did not include nonacupoint location(s) for comparison. Thus, further rigorous research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing the Effectiveness of Holistic Care in the United States: Integrating Religion and Spirituality. 推进美国整体护理的有效性:融合宗教与灵性。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0301
Katherine C Britt, Augustine C O Boateng, Benjamin R Doolittle
{"title":"Advancing the Effectiveness of Holistic Care in the United States: Integrating Religion and Spirituality.","authors":"Katherine C Britt, Augustine C O Boateng, Benjamin R Doolittle","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0301","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individualized Homeopathic Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Conditions: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Feasibility Trial. 个体化顺势疗法药物产品在治疗 COVID-19 后遗症中的应用:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、可行性试验。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0102
Abhijit Rana, Pulakendu Bhattacharya, Subhasish Ganguly, Sangita Saha, Satyajit Naskar, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Abdur Rahaman Shaikh, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee

Objectives: Evidence suggests that post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life, and up to 80% of those infected with COVID-19 may experience these symptoms. The objective of the present study was to identify the effects of individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) against placebos in postCOVID-19 conditions. Design: Double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial. Setting: D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Subjects: Sixty participants with post-COVID-19 conditions. Interventions: Group verum (n = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus group control (n = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). Outcome Measures: Feasibility issues; primary-post-COVID-19 symptoms checklist; secondary-Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2); all of them were measured at baseline, and monthly intervals, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed; group differences were reported using descriptive statistics: means, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and between group effect sizes (Cohen's d). Results: Feasibility concerns showed promise; recruitment, retention, and attrition rates were 34.2%, 95%, and 5%, respectively. Group differences in both primary and secondary outcomes favored IHMPs against placebos: symptoms checklist score mean difference after 3 months: -4.2, 95% CI -4.9 to -3.4, d = 2.854 and MYMOP-2 mean difference after 3 months: -2.2, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7, d = 2.082, respectively. Natrum muriaticum (11.7%), Pulsatilla nigricans (10%), Rhus toxicodendron (8.3%), and Calcarea carbonica (8.3%) were the most frequently prescribed remedies. Conclusions: IHMPs produced better results than placebos in reducing symptoms checklist scores and MYMOP-2 scores in the treatment of post-COVID-19 conditions. Definitive trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

目的:有证据表明,2019年后冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与健康相关的生活质量下降有关,多达80%的COVID-19感染者可能会出现这些症状。本研究旨在确定个体化顺势疗法药物产品(IHMPs)与安慰剂在COVID-19后症状中的对比效果。设计:双盲、随机(1:1)、两组平行、安慰剂对照、可行性试验。试验地点印度西孟加拉邦加尔各答 D. N. De 顺势疗法医学院和医院。受试者:60名患有COVID-19后遗症的参与者。干预措施:verum组(n = 30;IHMPs加辅助护理)与对照组(n = 30;安慰剂加辅助护理)。结果测量:可行性问题;主要--COVID-19 后症状检查表;次要--Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2);所有测量均在基线和每月间隔期进行,直至 3 个月。对意向治疗样本进行了分析;采用描述性统计方法报告了组间差异:平均值、95% 置信区间(CI)和组间效应大小(Cohen's d)。结果可行性研究结果表明,招募率、保留率和流失率分别为 34.2%、95% 和 5%。与安慰剂相比,IHMPs 在主要结果和次要结果上的组间差异更有利:3 个月后症状检查表得分的平均差异为-4.2,95% C:3个月后症状核对表得分平均差异:-4.2,95% CI -4.9至-3.4,d = 2.854;3个月后MYMOP-2平均差异:-2.2,95% CI -4.9至-3.4,d = 2.854:分别为-2.2,95% CI -2.8至-1.7,d = 2.082。最常使用的处方药是鼠曲草(11.7%)、白头翁(10%)、毒玫瑰(8.3%)和石菖蒲(8.3%)。结论在治疗 COVID-19 后遗症时,IHMP 在降低症状检查表评分和 MYMOP-2 评分方面的效果优于安慰剂。有必要进行最终试验来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Individualized Homeopathic Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Conditions: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Abhijit Rana, Pulakendu Bhattacharya, Subhasish Ganguly, Sangita Saha, Satyajit Naskar, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Abdur Rahaman Shaikh, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Evidence suggests that post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life, and up to 80% of those infected with COVID-19 may experience these symptoms. The objective of the present study was to identify the effects of individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) against placebos in postCOVID-19 conditions. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Sixty participants with post-COVID-19 conditions. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Group verum (<i>n</i> = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus group control (<i>n</i> = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). <b><i>Outcome Measures:</i></b> Feasibility issues; primary-post-COVID-19 symptoms checklist; secondary-Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2); all of them were measured at baseline, and monthly intervals, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed; group differences were reported using descriptive statistics: means, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and between group effect sizes (Cohen's <i>d</i>). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Feasibility concerns showed promise; recruitment, retention, and attrition rates were 34.2%, 95%, and 5%, respectively. Group differences in both primary and secondary outcomes favored IHMPs against placebos: symptoms checklist score mean difference after 3 months: -4.2, 95% CI -4.9 to -3.4, <i>d</i> = 2.854 and MYMOP-2 mean difference after 3 months: -2.2, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7, <i>d</i> = 2.082, respectively. <i>Natrum muriaticum</i> (11.7%), <i>Pulsatilla nigricans</i> (10%), <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> (8.3%), and <i>Calcarea carbonica</i> (8.3%) were the most frequently prescribed remedies. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IHMPs produced better results than placebos in reducing symptoms checklist scores and MYMOP-2 scores in the treatment of post-COVID-19 conditions. Definitive trials are warranted to confirm the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1