Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0181
Skylar Kelsven, Caitlin L McLean, Kiara Widjanarko, Jill E Bormann, Ariel J Lang
Objectives: This secondary analysis examined five facets of mindful awareness as potential moderators of clinical outcomes using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared Mantram Repetition Program (MRP) with present-centered therapy (PCT) in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Data were examined from 173 veterans with military-related PTSD randomly assigned to receive eight sessions of MRP (n = 89) or PCT (n = 84). Clinician-administered and self-report measures of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), PTSD severity, insomnia symptoms, and depression symptoms, and were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Hierarchical regressions were used to test for FFMQ moderation on clinical outcomes within the two treatment groups. Results: For those with greater ability to "describe their internal experience" (+1 standard deviation [SD]), MRP was associated with lower PTSD hyperarousal symptoms post-intervention than PCT (p < 0.001). For those with lower "nonreactivity to internal stimuli" (-1 SD), MRP was associated with greater reductions in PTSD avoidance and numbing symptoms and insomnia compared with PCT (all ps < 0.002). Conclusions: Pre-intervention mindfulness domains of "describe" and "nonreactivity to inner experience" differentially predicted improvements in PTSD and insomnia symptoms for MRP as compared with PCT subjects. The FFMQ may be an important tool for predicting patient preparedness for mindfulness-based interventions, such as MRP.
{"title":"Trait Mindfulness Moderates Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mantram Repetition Program for Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Skylar Kelsven, Caitlin L McLean, Kiara Widjanarko, Jill E Bormann, Ariel J Lang","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0181","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This secondary analysis examined five facets of mindful awareness as potential moderators of clinical outcomes using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared Mantram Repetition Program (MRP) with present-centered therapy (PCT) in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were examined from 173 veterans with military-related PTSD randomly assigned to receive eight sessions of MRP (<i>n</i> = 89) or PCT (<i>n</i> = 84). Clinician-administered and self-report measures of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), PTSD severity, insomnia symptoms, and depression symptoms, and were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Hierarchical regressions were used to test for FFMQ moderation on clinical outcomes within the two treatment groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For those with greater ability to \"describe their internal experience\" (+1 standard deviation [SD]), MRP was associated with lower PTSD hyperarousal symptoms post-intervention than PCT (<i>p</i> < 0.001). For those with lower \"nonreactivity to internal stimuli\" (-1 SD), MRP was associated with greater reductions in PTSD avoidance and numbing symptoms and insomnia compared with PCT (all <i>p</i>s < 0.002). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pre-intervention mindfulness domains of \"describe\" and \"nonreactivity to inner experience\" differentially predicted improvements in PTSD and insomnia symptoms for MRP as compared with PCT subjects. The FFMQ may be an important tool for predicting patient preparedness for mindfulness-based interventions, such as MRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1002-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0692
Richard W Wagner, Smitha Mallaiah, Clark R Anderson, Rosalinda Engle, Varsha Vasu, Eduardo Bruera, Balachundar Subramaniam, Lorenzo Cohen, Santhosshi Narayanan
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) experienced increased anxiety, depression, loneliness, and other mental health issues. HCWs need additional resources to cope with the mental health impact of their work. Yoga techniques could be helpful strategies to manage different stressors during times of uncertainty. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, trial examined the effects of a brief pranayama yoga practice on the wellbeing of HCWs during the height of COVID-19. HCWs were recruited through announcements and institutional websites at a large major cancer center in the southern United States. A short, prerecorded, 5-min breathwork video intervention called "Simha Kriya" was provided to participants, and they were encouraged to practice one to two times daily for 4 weeks. Participants completed self-report instruments at baseline and weeks 1 and 4, including: (1) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (2) Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); and (3) a questionnaire assessing the experience of COVID-19 among HCWs that had five subscales. HCWs also conducted a measure of breath holding time. Paired sample t-tests and mixed-effects analysis of variance models examined changes over time. Results: One hundred participants consented to the study, with 88 female, 60 white, 39 worked remotely, and 27 were clinical staff. Sixty-nine participants provided data at week 1 and 56 at week 4. Participants' adherence to the breathing exercises between weeks 1 and 4 was similar, with a mean of six times per week. At week 4, there were significant decreases in the COVID-19 Distress score (p < 0.0001) and COVID-19 Disruption (p = 0.013), yet no changes in the PSS. There were also significant increases in COVID-19 Stress Management (p = 0.0001) and BRCS scores (p = 0.012), but no changes in Perceived Benefits of COVID-19 and no changes in breath holding time. Discussion: Brief yoga-based breathing practices helped reduce pandemic-specific stress, improved resilience, and stress management skills in HCWs. Trial Registration Number: NCT04482647.
{"title":"Effects of the Brief Simha Kriya Breathing Practice for Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Richard W Wagner, Smitha Mallaiah, Clark R Anderson, Rosalinda Engle, Varsha Vasu, Eduardo Bruera, Balachundar Subramaniam, Lorenzo Cohen, Santhosshi Narayanan","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0692","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) experienced increased anxiety, depression, loneliness, and other mental health issues. HCWs need additional resources to cope with the mental health impact of their work. Yoga techniques could be helpful strategies to manage different stressors during times of uncertainty. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective, single-arm, trial examined the effects of a brief pranayama yoga practice on the wellbeing of HCWs during the height of COVID-19. HCWs were recruited through announcements and institutional websites at a large major cancer center in the southern United States. A short, prerecorded, 5-min breathwork video intervention called \"Simha Kriya\" was provided to participants, and they were encouraged to practice one to two times daily for 4 weeks. Participants completed self-report instruments at baseline and weeks 1 and 4, including: (1) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (2) Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); and (3) a questionnaire assessing the experience of COVID-19 among HCWs that had five subscales. HCWs also conducted a measure of breath holding time. Paired sample <i>t</i>-tests and mixed-effects analysis of variance models examined changes over time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred participants consented to the study, with 88 female, 60 white, 39 worked remotely, and 27 were clinical staff. Sixty-nine participants provided data at week 1 and 56 at week 4. Participants' adherence to the breathing exercises between weeks 1 and 4 was similar, with a mean of six times per week. At week 4, there were significant decreases in the COVID-19 Distress score (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and COVID-19 Disruption (<i>p</i> = 0.013), yet no changes in the PSS. There were also significant increases in COVID-19 Stress Management (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and BRCS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.012), but no changes in Perceived Benefits of COVID-19 and no changes in breath holding time. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Brief yoga-based breathing practices helped reduce pandemic-specific stress, improved resilience, and stress management skills in HCWs. <b>Trial Registration Number:</b> NCT04482647.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"970-977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140307130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy (UgA) for the treatment of thoracodorsal myofascial pain syndrome (TDMPS) and monitor its mid-term efficacy at 3 months after treatment. Methods: A 3-week, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted among 100 patients with TDMPS (visual analogue scale [VAS] score > 3) in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Orthopaedics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with a 3-month follow-up starting after completion of treatment. These patients were randomly assigned to receive UgA (n = 50) or oral celecoxib (n = 50). Recruitment was conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome was the VAS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. Outcome data were collected at baseline, week 3 (post-treatment) and week 15 (follow-up). Results: Compared with that in the celecoxib group, the pain in the UgA group was alleviated more strongly, with an adjusted mean group difference of -0.69 (95% CI,-1.07 to -0.31 after multiple imputation) at week 3 and -1.96 (95% CI,-2.33 to -1.59 after multiple imputation) at week 15 (p < 0.001 for overall group × time interaction). Both groups exhibited improvements in the ODI and PASS scores at weeks 3 and 15, but these improvements were significantly greater in the UgA group (p < 0.05). At week 3, the TNF-α and IL-1 levels were significantly lower in both groups, but celecoxib was more effective (p < 0.05). Results from analyses with multilevel multiple imputation for missingness were similar. Conclusion: UgA led to greater and safer alleviation of pain, dysfunction, and pain anxiety in patients treated with TDMPS than did celecoxib and had a durable 3-month efficacy but was inferior to celecoxib in reducing the level of inflammatory factors. These findings may prompt clinicians to recommend UgA as an alternative and supplementary therapy for pain management in patients with TDMPS.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy Versus Celecoxib in Patients with Thoracodorsal Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zhou Yanling, Lingxiang Hong, Chao Wang, Yong Nie, Yingzong Xiong, Zhiwen Zheng, Junchen Zhu","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0490","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy (UgA) for the treatment of thoracodorsal myofascial pain syndrome (TDMPS) and monitor its mid-term efficacy at 3 months after treatment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 3-week, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted among 100 patients with TDMPS (visual analogue scale [VAS] score > 3) in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Orthopaedics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with a 3-month follow-up starting after completion of treatment. These patients were randomly assigned to receive UgA (<i>n</i> = 50) or oral celecoxib (<i>n</i> = 50). Recruitment was conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome was the VAS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. Outcome data were collected at baseline, week 3 (post-treatment) and week 15 (follow-up). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with that in the celecoxib group, the pain in the UgA group was alleviated more strongly, with an adjusted mean group difference of -0.69 (95% CI,-1.07 to -0.31 after multiple imputation) at week 3 and -1.96 (95% CI,-2.33 to -1.59 after multiple imputation) at week 15 (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for overall group × time interaction). Both groups exhibited improvements in the ODI and PASS scores at weeks 3 and 15, but these improvements were significantly greater in the UgA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At week 3, the TNF-α and IL-1 levels were significantly lower in both groups, but celecoxib was more effective (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Results from analyses with multilevel multiple imputation for missingness were similar. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> UgA led to greater and safer alleviation of pain, dysfunction, and pain anxiety in patients treated with TDMPS than did celecoxib and had a durable 3-month efficacy but was inferior to celecoxib in reducing the level of inflammatory factors. These findings may prompt clinicians to recommend UgA as an alternative and supplementary therapy for pain management in patients with TDMPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"986-994"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0754
Holger Cramer
{"title":"Sustainable Health Care: How Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Could Lead the Shift Towards Eco-Friendly Practices.","authors":"Holger Cramer","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0754","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0754","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"907-909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0749
Jack Tsai, Hind A Beydoun, Alexandra Howard, Cathy St Pierre
Background: Homeless-experienced veterans (HEVs) are an important but challenging group to care for in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system, and there are opportunities to examine the potential of integrative and complementary medicine approaches. Methods: This observational study enrolled 33 HEVs in a one-group observational, prospective study of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) with a monthly follow-up for 3 months after initiating BFA. Results: Linear growth curve analyses revealed a significant improvement in overall pain scores and scores on the effects of pain on activity level, mood, and stress. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest the potential of BFA to improve pain among HEVs as an area for further research.
{"title":"Small Observational Study of Battlefield Acupuncture for Homeless-Experienced Veterans.","authors":"Jack Tsai, Hind A Beydoun, Alexandra Howard, Cathy St Pierre","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0749","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Homeless-experienced veterans (HEVs) are an important but challenging group to care for in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system, and there are opportunities to examine the potential of integrative and complementary medicine approaches. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This observational study enrolled 33 HEVs in a one-group observational, prospective study of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) with a monthly follow-up for 3 months after initiating BFA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Linear growth curve analyses revealed a significant improvement in overall pain scores and scores on the effects of pain on activity level, mood, and stress. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These preliminary findings suggest the potential of BFA to improve pain among HEVs as an area for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1008-1012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-16DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0204
EunMee Yang, Weidong Lu, Dennis Muñoz-Vergara, Esme Goldfinger, Ted J Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Andrew C Ahn, Peter M Wayne
Introduction: The concept of acupoints is a key defining feature of acupuncture, yet the scientific basis of acupoints remains unclear. In recent years, there has been an emerging body of animal studies demonstrating an association between cutaneous sensitivity and visceral pathophysiology, through which acupoints over the skin are sensitized in pathologic conditions. Several studies with humans have also been conducted to assess whether the sensitivity of acupoints is distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, no systematic review has been conducted to collate and synthesize the status and quality of human studies on this topic. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Literature search was performed by combining variations of search terms related to acupoints and pain sensitivity in PubMed, EMBASE, and Alt HealthWatch (EBSCOHost). Screening of titles and abstracts and review of full-text articles for eligibility were performed by two independent investigators. Using a predefined template, information on subject characteristics, pathologic conditions, names of assessed acupoints, and relevant main findings were extracted from the included studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies. A quality assessment checklist was also developed by the present authors to examine the quality of reporting of experimental variables that were considered important for evaluating acupoint sensitivity. Results: A total of 3453 studies were identified from the database search, of which 11 met the eligibility criteria to be included in this review. Six studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of body acupoints, and the remaining five studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of auricular points. Overall, findings suggest that the sensitivity of acupoints may be distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, there were various potential sources of bias and substantial heterogeneity across included studies in clinical conditions and acupoints. Conclusion: There is at present insufficient evidence to support or refute that acupoints in humans are sensitized in pathologic conditions. There were various methodological issues, including small sample size and poor reporting of experimental design and variables, which limit the ability to draw a definitive conclusion on this topic. It is also largely unclear whether it is the general body regions rather than specific acupoints that may be sensitized, as most studies did not include nonacupoint location(s) for comparison. Thus, further rigorous research is warranted.
导言:穴位概念是针灸的一个重要特征,但穴位的科学依据仍不明确。近年来,越来越多的动物实验表明,皮肤敏感性与内脏病理生理之间存在关联,在病理情况下,皮肤上的穴位会产生敏感性。此外,还对人类进行了多项研究,以评估健康人群与临床人群的穴位敏感性是否存在差异。然而,目前还没有系统性的综述来整理和归纳有关这一主题的人类研究的现状和质量。研究方法根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)进行了系统综述。在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Alt HealthWatch(EBSCOHost)中结合与穴位和疼痛敏感性相关的不同检索词进行文献检索。由两名独立调查人员筛选标题和摘要,并审查全文是否合格。使用预定义模板,从纳入的研究中提取受试者特征、病理条件、评估穴位名称和相关主要结论等信息。纳入研究的方法学质量采用针对病例对照研究的修订版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。本文作者还制定了一份质量评估核对表,以检查被认为对评估穴位敏感性很重要的实验变量的报告质量。结果:通过数据库搜索共发现了 3453 项研究,其中 11 项符合纳入本综述的资格标准。其中六项研究考察了体表穴位的机械敏感性,其余五项研究考察了耳穴的机械敏感性。总体而言,研究结果表明,穴位的敏感性在健康人群和临床人群中可能有所不同。然而,在临床条件和穴位方面,纳入的研究存在各种潜在的偏差来源和大量异质性。结论目前还没有足够的证据支持或反驳人体穴位在病理情况下具有敏感性。研究中存在各种方法问题,包括样本量小、实验设计和变量报告不完善等,这些问题限制了就这一主题得出明确结论的能力。此外,由于大多数研究都没有将非穴位位置作为比较对象,因此还不清楚是否是全身区域而非特定穴位可能会过敏。因此,有必要进行进一步的严格研究。
{"title":"Acupoint Sensitivity in Health and Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"EunMee Yang, Weidong Lu, Dennis Muñoz-Vergara, Esme Goldfinger, Ted J Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Andrew C Ahn, Peter M Wayne","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0204","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The concept of acupoints is a key defining feature of acupuncture, yet the scientific basis of acupoints remains unclear. In recent years, there has been an emerging body of animal studies demonstrating an association between cutaneous sensitivity and visceral pathophysiology, through which acupoints over the skin are sensitized in pathologic conditions. Several studies with humans have also been conducted to assess whether the sensitivity of acupoints is distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, no systematic review has been conducted to collate and synthesize the status and quality of human studies on this topic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Literature search was performed by combining variations of search terms related to acupoints and pain sensitivity in PubMed, EMBASE, and Alt HealthWatch (EBSCOHost). Screening of titles and abstracts and review of full-text articles for eligibility were performed by two independent investigators. Using a predefined template, information on subject characteristics, pathologic conditions, names of assessed acupoints, and relevant main findings were extracted from the included studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies. A quality assessment checklist was also developed by the present authors to examine the quality of reporting of experimental variables that were considered important for evaluating acupoint sensitivity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 3453 studies were identified from the database search, of which 11 met the eligibility criteria to be included in this review. Six studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of body acupoints, and the remaining five studies examined the mechanical sensitivity of auricular points. Overall, findings suggest that the sensitivity of acupoints may be distinct in healthy versus clinical populations. However, there were various potential sources of bias and substantial heterogeneity across included studies in clinical conditions and acupoints. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is at present insufficient evidence to support or refute that acupoints in humans are sensitized in pathologic conditions. There were various methodological issues, including small sample size and poor reporting of experimental design and variables, which limit the ability to draw a definitive conclusion on this topic. It is also largely unclear whether it is the general body regions rather than specific acupoints that may be sensitized, as most studies did not include nonacupoint location(s) for comparison. Thus, further rigorous research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"925-939"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0791
Jia-Ming Chen, Chia-Chu Chang, Ya-Lun Li, Ping-Fang Chiu, John Y Chiang, Po-Chi Hsu, Lun-Chien Lo
Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is frequent in patients with hemodialysis (HD) and occurs predominantly in its most severe forms. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for RLS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at hospital-based HD center. Methods: This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with HD and RLS who were randomly assigned to the experimental group and control group. Data were collected using the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and heart rate variability (HRV) records at baseline, after the therapeutic course (12 times/4 weeks), and 1-week follow-up. Result: A total of 47 patients were evaluated with IRLSRS score from 11 to 30 in this study. There were 41 patients enrolled in the study based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and allocated randomly into two groups. A total of 35 participants completed the trial, including 18 subjects in the experimental group and 17 subjects in the control group. The comparison of IRLSRS and ISI showed a significant reduction between two groups after acupuncture treatment (p = 0.002, p = 0.003). The ISI after 1-week follow-up also revealed significant decrease (p = 0.003). This HRV results showed that high frequency (HF%) increased significantly (p = 0.021) and low frequency (LF%) decreased significantly in the acupuncture group (p = 0.021). The generalized estimating equation showed that the IRLSRS improved by 2.902 points (p < 0.001) in the acupuncture group compared with the control group and by 1.340 points (p = 0.003) after 1-week follow-up. There were no adverse effects observed during HD in this study. Discussion: The authors conclude that acupuncture could effectively improve the symptoms of RLS significantly. The results from this study provide clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture to treat the patients with RLS at the HD center.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Restless Legs Syndrome in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Randomized-Controlled Trial at Hospital-Based Hemodialysis Center.","authors":"Jia-Ming Chen, Chia-Chu Chang, Ya-Lun Li, Ping-Fang Chiu, John Y Chiang, Po-Chi Hsu, Lun-Chien Lo","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0791","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is frequent in patients with hemodialysis (HD) and occurs predominantly in its most severe forms. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for RLS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at hospital-based HD center. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with HD and RLS who were randomly assigned to the experimental group and control group. Data were collected using the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and heart rate variability (HRV) records at baseline, after the therapeutic course (12 times/4 weeks), and 1-week follow-up. <b><i>Result:</i></b> A total of 47 patients were evaluated with IRLSRS score from 11 to 30 in this study. There were 41 patients enrolled in the study based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and allocated randomly into two groups. A total of 35 participants completed the trial, including 18 subjects in the experimental group and 17 subjects in the control group. The comparison of IRLSRS and ISI showed a significant reduction between two groups after acupuncture treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>p</i> = 0.003). The ISI after 1-week follow-up also revealed significant decrease (<i>p</i> = 0.003). This HRV results showed that high frequency (HF%) increased significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and low frequency (LF%) decreased significantly in the acupuncture group (<i>p</i> = 0.021). The generalized estimating equation showed that the IRLSRS improved by 2.902 points (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the acupuncture group compared with the control group and by 1.340 points (<i>p</i> = 0.003) after 1-week follow-up. There were no adverse effects observed during HD in this study. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The authors conclude that acupuncture could effectively improve the symptoms of RLS significantly. The results from this study provide clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture to treat the patients with RLS at the HD center.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"978-985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana,Ernesto Andrade Divenuto,Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima
Background: This bibliometric review seeks to understand metrics of papers, authors, journals, and universities, about the benefits of the therapeutic application of Cannabis sativa (CS), as well as the most harmful effects associated to its use. Methods: The main search strategy applied to the topic was conducted in Web Of Science Core Collection on February 2024. A crossmatch of the number of citations was performed in Scopus and Google Scholar. The analyses were carried out in VOSviewer and Altmetric for PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: Of a total of 196 records, 53 articles were included for analysis. There were 25 publications on either therapeutic or harmful effects. In the ranking of subjects, those of greatest interest were general oral health and periodontics, with 53% of the total. The most cited paper was authored by Thomson et al. (2008) with 85 citations, allowing the University of Otago to be the most cited. Although JAMA was the most cited journal, in the dental field this corresponded to the Journal of Clinical Periodontology. In relation to the distribution by country, the United States received the largest number of citations and New Zealand second. Related to dentistry, in the cluster analysis, keywords more occurrent were "periodontal disease" and "periodontitis". Conclusions: In the past 4 years, there has been a superlative growth in CS papers related to oral health effects. This growth follows the social and political events related to CS legalization in some countries and reveals that the use of CS in dentistry is an emerging research field.
{"title":"Cannabis Uses in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana,Ernesto Andrade Divenuto,Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0368","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This bibliometric review seeks to understand metrics of papers, authors, journals, and universities, about the benefits of the therapeutic application of Cannabis sativa (CS), as well as the most harmful effects associated to its use. Methods: The main search strategy applied to the topic was conducted in Web Of Science Core Collection on February 2024. A crossmatch of the number of citations was performed in Scopus and Google Scholar. The analyses were carried out in VOSviewer and Altmetric for PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: Of a total of 196 records, 53 articles were included for analysis. There were 25 publications on either therapeutic or harmful effects. In the ranking of subjects, those of greatest interest were general oral health and periodontics, with 53% of the total. The most cited paper was authored by Thomson et al. (2008) with 85 citations, allowing the University of Otago to be the most cited. Although JAMA was the most cited journal, in the dental field this corresponded to the Journal of Clinical Periodontology. In relation to the distribution by country, the United States received the largest number of citations and New Zealand second. Related to dentistry, in the cluster analysis, keywords more occurrent were \"periodontal disease\" and \"periodontitis\". Conclusions: In the past 4 years, there has been a superlative growth in CS papers related to oral health effects. This growth follows the social and political events related to CS legalization in some countries and reveals that the use of CS in dentistry is an emerging research field.","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":"190 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robert J Trager,Matthew D Nichols,Tyler D Barnett,Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick,Sunah Song,Thomas E Love,Françoise Adan,Jeffery A Dusek
Objective: Owing to perceived additional costs, patients may avoid integrative health and medicine (IHM) treatments, while insurers may not cover IHM. We hypothesized that adult beneficiaries of a health system's employee insurance plan with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions receiving covered outpatient IHM would have reduced total allowed costs over the 1-year follow-up compared with matched controls, secondarily exploring medical and pharmaceutical cost subsets. Methods: We queried medical records and claims spanning 2018-2023 for beneficiaries aged 18-89 years with a new MSK episode. Patients were divided into cohorts: (1) IHM within 3 months after MSK diagnosis and (2) no IHM after initial primary care. After inflation adjustment and trimming, propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts on demographics, comorbidity, health care utilization, and prior 12-month spend. Least-squares mean total, medical, and pharmaceutical allowed costs (United States Dollar) over the 1-year follow-up were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Findings were compared with a generalized linear model without trimming. Results: There were 251 patients per matched cohort, with adequate covariate balance. There was no meaningful between-cohort difference (IHM minus No IHM) in least-squares mean total cost (+703 [95% CI: -314, 1720]). Secondary outcomes included medical cost (+878 [95% CI: 61, 1695]) and pharmaceutical cost (+6 [95% CI: -71, 83]). A generalized linear model revealed no meaningful difference in estimated mean total medical costs (-2561 [95% CI: -7346, +2224]). Conclusions: IHM use among adult health system beneficiaries with MSK conditions was not associated with meaningful differences in 1-year follow-up total health care costs compared with matched controls. Our study was underpowered for secondary outcomes, which should be interpreted with caution. Future research should include a larger sample of patients and examine longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes.
{"title":"Impact of Integrative Health and Medicine on Costs Associated with Adult Health System Beneficiaries with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Robert J Trager,Matthew D Nichols,Tyler D Barnett,Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick,Sunah Song,Thomas E Love,Françoise Adan,Jeffery A Dusek","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0812","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Owing to perceived additional costs, patients may avoid integrative health and medicine (IHM) treatments, while insurers may not cover IHM. We hypothesized that adult beneficiaries of a health system's employee insurance plan with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions receiving covered outpatient IHM would have reduced total allowed costs over the 1-year follow-up compared with matched controls, secondarily exploring medical and pharmaceutical cost subsets. Methods: We queried medical records and claims spanning 2018-2023 for beneficiaries aged 18-89 years with a new MSK episode. Patients were divided into cohorts: (1) IHM within 3 months after MSK diagnosis and (2) no IHM after initial primary care. After inflation adjustment and trimming, propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts on demographics, comorbidity, health care utilization, and prior 12-month spend. Least-squares mean total, medical, and pharmaceutical allowed costs (United States Dollar) over the 1-year follow-up were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Findings were compared with a generalized linear model without trimming. Results: There were 251 patients per matched cohort, with adequate covariate balance. There was no meaningful between-cohort difference (IHM minus No IHM) in least-squares mean total cost (+703 [95% CI: -314, 1720]). Secondary outcomes included medical cost (+878 [95% CI: 61, 1695]) and pharmaceutical cost (+6 [95% CI: -71, 83]). A generalized linear model revealed no meaningful difference in estimated mean total medical costs (-2561 [95% CI: -7346, +2224]). Conclusions: IHM use among adult health system beneficiaries with MSK conditions was not associated with meaningful differences in 1-year follow-up total health care costs compared with matched controls. Our study was underpowered for secondary outcomes, which should be interpreted with caution. Future research should include a larger sample of patients and examine longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes.","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142249011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cecile A Lengacher,Richard R Reich,Carmen S Rodriguez,Anh Thy Nguyen,Jong Y Park,Hongdao Meng,Sara Tinsley,Gizem Hueluer,Kristine A Donovan,Manolete S Moscoso,Elizabeth Bornstein,John Kiluk,Sreenidhi Nidamanur,Lynne S Padgett,Jean M Lucas,Tamela Fonseca,Anisha Joshi,Katherine J Lin,Matthew Goodman,Kevin E Kip
Introduction: The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Program for breast cancer survivors (BCS) is designed to enhance cognitive training through formal and informal meditational practices. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate if BCS assigned to either the MBSR(BC), Breast Cancer Education Support (BCES), or Usual Care (UC) regimens experienced greater improvements at 6, 12, and 26 weeks on objective and subjective cognitive performance. Methods: BCS (n = 212) randomized to a three-group RCT: MBSR(BC) (n = 91), BCES (n = 90), or UC (n = 31) were assessed on cognitive performance and symptoms at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Linear mixed models were fit to evaluate the effects of the MBSR(BC) program, hypothesizing ordered effect improvements: (MBSR[BC] highest, BCES intermediate, UC lowest) along with baseline characteristics evaluated as moderators. Results: Of the BCS (mean age of 57), 73% were White, and non-Hispanic, and 77% received both chemotherapy (CT) and radiation. Cognitive performance improved in all groups. Although there were no statistically significant between-group differences in cognitive outcomes, significant symptom reductions occurred for the MBSR(BC) group (p = 0.003). Within-group effect size analysis at 26 weeks showed substantial improvements in all three groups (effect sizes >0.50) in subjective impairments and quality of life (effect size >0.50) and objective measures of cognitive performance. MBSR(BC) showed the largest within-group effect size in the reduction of fatigue (effect size = 0.81). Effect sizes occurred in the hypothesized direction for 10 of the 18 outcomes. Discussion: Although the MBSR(BC) program did not show significant differences in cognitive performance compared with BCES and UC, all groups improved and reductions in fatigue were beneficial for MBSR(BC). Results suggest that cognitive performance may improve after CT over time considering one's natural history. Furthermore, BCS enrolled in RCTs may be more motivated to improve their health status (NCT02786797).
{"title":"Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Breast Cancer (MBSR(BC)) a Treatment for Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment (CRCI): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Cecile A Lengacher,Richard R Reich,Carmen S Rodriguez,Anh Thy Nguyen,Jong Y Park,Hongdao Meng,Sara Tinsley,Gizem Hueluer,Kristine A Donovan,Manolete S Moscoso,Elizabeth Bornstein,John Kiluk,Sreenidhi Nidamanur,Lynne S Padgett,Jean M Lucas,Tamela Fonseca,Anisha Joshi,Katherine J Lin,Matthew Goodman,Kevin E Kip","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0184","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Program for breast cancer survivors (BCS) is designed to enhance cognitive training through formal and informal meditational practices. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate if BCS assigned to either the MBSR(BC), Breast Cancer Education Support (BCES), or Usual Care (UC) regimens experienced greater improvements at 6, 12, and 26 weeks on objective and subjective cognitive performance. Methods: BCS (n = 212) randomized to a three-group RCT: MBSR(BC) (n = 91), BCES (n = 90), or UC (n = 31) were assessed on cognitive performance and symptoms at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Linear mixed models were fit to evaluate the effects of the MBSR(BC) program, hypothesizing ordered effect improvements: (MBSR[BC] highest, BCES intermediate, UC lowest) along with baseline characteristics evaluated as moderators. Results: Of the BCS (mean age of 57), 73% were White, and non-Hispanic, and 77% received both chemotherapy (CT) and radiation. Cognitive performance improved in all groups. Although there were no statistically significant between-group differences in cognitive outcomes, significant symptom reductions occurred for the MBSR(BC) group (p = 0.003). Within-group effect size analysis at 26 weeks showed substantial improvements in all three groups (effect sizes >0.50) in subjective impairments and quality of life (effect size >0.50) and objective measures of cognitive performance. MBSR(BC) showed the largest within-group effect size in the reduction of fatigue (effect size = 0.81). Effect sizes occurred in the hypothesized direction for 10 of the 18 outcomes. Discussion: Although the MBSR(BC) program did not show significant differences in cognitive performance compared with BCES and UC, all groups improved and reductions in fatigue were beneficial for MBSR(BC). Results suggest that cognitive performance may improve after CT over time considering one's natural history. Furthermore, BCS enrolled in RCTs may be more motivated to improve their health status (NCT02786797).","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}