Objective: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) provide comprehensive primary care to underserved populations. While the presence of chiropractic services in these multidisciplinary systems is of growing interest, little is known. The purpose of this study is to identify and map where Doctors of Chiropractic (DCs) are employed or providing care within FQHCs and describe their employment characteristics. Methods: Websites for FQHC clinics identified by the Health Resources and Services Administration were reviewed to determine whether chiropractic services are offered and/or a DC is employed at that clinic. Identified DCs were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey, which included questions about their employment. Analysis of survey data utilized descriptive statistics and content analysis of open-ended questions. Results: We identified 233 DCs working full- or part-time in 146 of 1537 (9.5%) FQHC systems, with two thirds of those employing more than one DC. Chiropractic services are delivered at FQHCs in 28/50 U.S. states, 75.0% of which offer a chiropractic benefit in their state Medicaid program. California had the largest concentration of FQHCs offering chiropractic services (65/146, 44.5%). Of surveys sent to 206 viable DC e-mail addresses, 101 were completed (49.0% response rate). Most DCs responded to personal (39.0%) or advertised (26.0%) solicitation for employment by the FQHC, while some DCs (14.0%) initiated the opportunity. Average employment at the FQHC was 5.1 years. Credentialing levels and compensation structures were inconsistent. DCs predominantly spend their time on clinical care (mean 88.0%) compared with administrative tasks (mean 10.4%). Conclusion: This study provides important baseline information about the presence of chiropractic within FQHCs and DCs employment characteristics. Future research should include exploring the roles DCs fulfill within FQHCs, skills necessary for successful collaboration, and barriers to incorporating chiropractic services within these systems.
Background: Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) stands out as one of the most severe side effects among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Given the varied conclusions in previous studies concerning the association between acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or acupuncture combined with standard oral care and therapeutic effects, our aim is to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing RIX in patients with HNC. Methods: Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Database) were electronically searched, following the Cochrane manual and adhering to reported Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from their inception dates to July 1, 2024. Primary randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified, with the Xerostomia Questionnaire and Xerostomia Inventory designated as the primary outcomes. Salivary flow rates (unstimulated or stimulated) were defined as secondary outcomes. Results: Eight clinical trials involving 1273 participants were analyzed, with six studies included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that acupuncture demonstrated a significant improvement in patient-reported xerostomia scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02], I2 = 0%) in comparison to standard care, but did not significantly improve oral dryness symptoms compared with sham acupuncture (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.16], I2 = 25.8%). The merged total showed negative result (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.01], I2 = 8.2%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.58, 0.13], I2 = 0%) and unstimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.72], I2 = 67.2%). In general, the acupuncture did not cause serious adverse effects. Conclusion: As far as current research is concerned, acupuncture treatment for RIX symptoms in patients with HNC still lacks strong and convincing evidence support. The more scientific research methods and more clinical trials are still needed.
Objective: The growing population of individuals with chronic pain presents a challenge to a globally overburdened health care workforce. Naturopaths are trained as primary health care providers who manage patients with chronic pain and, yet, are often overlooked in health care teams. This scoping review aims to identify barriers and facilitators affecting naturopathic inclusion into interprofessional health care teams managing patients with chronic pain. Methods: This study protocol was registered a priori through Open Science (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2G3JT). A search was conducted using databases AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, and Health Business Elite. Search limits included English language from 2012 to 2023. Included publications were from academic and gray literature. Search terms used included the following: "Naturopath*" OR "Integrative medicine" AND "Health care system*" OR "Health system*" OR "Models of health care" OR "Professional autonomy" OR "Professional regulation" OR "Professional govern*" OR "Interprofessional practice (IPP)" OR "Multidisciplinary communication." The scoping review utilized Covidence software and was analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were identified following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework to inform a narrative approach. Results: Five themes emerged that relate to the inclusion of naturopaths in health care teams as follows: (1) perceptions of naturopathy, (2) practice standards, (3) legitimacy, (4) resources, and (5) shifting power dynamics and cooperation. Conclusions: Barriers for naturopathic inclusion into health care teams are influenced by perceptions of naturopathy, naturopathic education standards, regulations, research, and patient equity and access. Facilitators for inclusion include the growing shift toward person-centered care, greater interprofessional education, and shared assets, including colocation.
Introduction: Low rates of online health literacy put consumers at risk of misinformation, but this could be mitigated through practitioner engagement. Integrative health (IH) crosses health care disciplines, so it is well-positioned to improve health information sharing. IH practitioners require evidence-based medicine (EBM) and electronic health literacy (eHL) competencies to make such impact. Several EBM assessments exist, but none are IH-specific. The Fresno Test of EBM FEBM is a validated, performance-based assessment used in medical education. We sought to assess feasibility of incorporating eHL and EBM assessments into graduate coursework while adapting and validating the FEBM for an IH audience (FEBM-IH). Methods: A pilot observational design was used to adapt, evaluate, administer, and validate the FEBM-IH. Revalidation of the FEBM-IH began with a discipline-focused adaptation, which was reviewed by an expert panel. The FEBM-IH was then administered to IH students and faculty. Independently scored assessments determined inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, item discrimination, and item difficulty. eHL assessments (eHEALS and General Health Numeracy Test-6) were also embedded in the online course. Results: Outcome completion rates suggest the FEBM-IH and eHL assessment tools are feasible to include in online courses, with 68.9% (102/148) eligible participants joining and 76.5% (78/102) completing all questions in all measures. The FEBM-IH demonstrated excellent assessor agreement (kappa = 0.97, p < 0.001), high internal consistency (α = 0.799), and acceptable item discrimination (0.26-0.68). Median self-perceived eHL scores increased from 30/40 to 33/40 points by course's end, suggesting some increase in eHL. Conclusions: Tools were feasible to integrate; FEBM-IH maintains acceptable validity; and further exploration of the relationship between EBM and eHL is warranted.
Objective: Acupuncture is a traditional Chinese medical therapy that has shown effective results in the treatment of pressure injuries (PI). However, current clinical research methodologies have certain flaws that impact the evaluation of efficacy. This review aims to summarize the characteristics of existing clinical studies on acupuncture treatment for PI and analyze the current research status. Methods: Following the research methodology for scoping reviews, databases, including CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were searched. The search period covered from the inception of the databases up to February 22, 2024. The studies included were screened, summarized, and analyzed, extracting data from three aspects as follows: bibliometric data, patient information, and research design. Results: A total of 46 clinical studies were included. These comprised 30 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 11 case series, 2 case reports, and 3 controlled clinical trials. Filiform needle therapy was the most commonly used acupuncture technique. Acupuncture is basically performed locally on the wound surface. The clinical efficacy rate was the most frequently used outcome measure. Conclusions: Clinical studies on acupuncture for PI have issues such as nonstandard selection and reporting of outcomes, inconsistent indicator evaluation tools, and unclear concept of "randomization" in RCTs. These factors lead to significant heterogeneity among studies, affecting the assessment of treatment efficacy. Future research should strictly standardize the design and reporting of RCTs and promote the establishment of core outcome sets for acupuncture treatment of PI, to enhance the evidence quality of acupuncture clinical research.
Introduction: This study aimed to understand health care providers' experiences implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy (OBPP) over time. The Medicaid OBPP expanded coverage of evidence-based nonpharmacological therapy (NPT) for back pain and restricted access to opioid therapy and interventional approaches. Methods: The study included six online, asynchronous focus groups with providers in February 2020 (Time 1) and August 2022 (Time 2). Analysis was conducted with a longitudinal, recurrent cross-sectional approach. Analysis occurred in three stages: (1) An immersion/crystallization approach was used to analyze Time 1 focus group data, (2) reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze Time 2 data, and (3) longitudinal analysis was used to integrate the findings across time points. Results: At Time 1, 48 clinicians and 44 NPT providers participated in the study. Time 2 included 63 clinicians and 59 NPT providers. The longitudinal analysis of the focus group data resulted in four themes: (1) general awareness of the policy, (2) providers support the policy and perceive a benefit to their patients, (3) barriers to NPT accessibility, and (4) barriers to referring patients to NPT. Conclusion: The goal of the OBPP was to improve back pain care for Oregon Medicaid members by increasing access to evidence-based NPT and decreasing reliance on opioid medications. This study revealed that, although clinicians and NPT providers supported the policy, they faced persistent implementation challenges related to referrals, prior authorizations, coverage limitations, low reimbursement rates, and a reduced workforce for NPT providers. In some cases, implementation barriers were removed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but other challenges were more prominent during the pandemic.
Background: Women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) often utilize acupuncture to enhance pregnancy outcomes. Yet, the optimal timing for acupuncture sessions and the relationship between dosage and effect remain uncertain. Objectives: To investigate the impact of the timing and dosage of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes, drawing on existing research. Methods: A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted from their inception to January 14th, 2023, without restrictions on language. Only randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture with either sham acupuncture or no adjuvant treatment were selected for inclusion. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of acupuncture in IVF-ET, analyzing the influence of varied timing and dosage on pregnancy outcomes. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to address any heterogeneity across the studies. Results: A total of 38 RCTs involving 5,991 participants were analyzed. In infertile women undergoing IVF fresh cycles, acupuncture performed during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.65, p = 0.01), whereas acupuncture administered either before COH or on the day of ET did not demonstrate reproductive benefits. Regarding frozen cycles, acupuncture before freeze-thaw embryo transfer (FET) significantly enhanced the CPR (RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.36-2.16, p < 0.00001) and live birth rate (LBR) (RR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.20-4.79, p = 0.01). Improvements in CPR were observed across all dosage groups, but only the high-dosage group showed a significant increase in LBR (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.92, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Timing and dosage of acupuncture are crucial factors affecting pregnancy outcomes in IVF-ET. For women undergoing IVF fresh cycles, acupuncture during COH yielded more significant reproductive benefits. In addition, acupuncture before freeze-thaw embryo transfer (FET) was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in frozen cycles. Furthermore, higher dosages of acupuncture were linked to more favorable outcomes.
Background: Primary dysmenorrhea is a common gynecological disorder that affects many women of reproductive age. Ginger, a widely used spice with anti-inflammatory properties, has been suggested as a potential treatment for the painful cramps associated with this condition. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ginger for pain management in primary dysmenorrhea. Methods: Our systematic review was registered in Prospero (CRD42023418001). Six English (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL complete, and Cochrane) and one Persian electric database (SID) was searched up to May 2023 for English or Persian studies that measure the effect of ginger on pain in dysmenorrhea. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Out of the 804 articles initially identified from the search, 24 were included for qualitative analysis and 12 for quantitative analysis after a full-text evaluation. The combined results of the studies indicate that ginger is notably more effective than placebo in reducing both the intensity (SMD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.59 to -0.68, I2 = 81.05%) and duration of pain (SMD = -0.29; 95% CI = -0.46 to -0.12). There were no differences between ginger and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI = -0.24 to 0.25), or exercise (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI = -0.66 to 0.78) for pain intensity. Safety-related data were infrequently reported. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that ginger can effectively reduce pain associated with dysmenorrhea. The findings are limited due to risk of bias in the included studies and the unclear risk-benefit ratio.
Background: Low app engagement is a central barrier to digital mental health efficacy. With mindfulness-based mental health apps growing in popularity, there is a need for new understanding of factors influencing engagement. This study utilized digital phenotyping to understand real-time patterns of engagement around app-based mindfulness. Different engagement metrics are presented that measure both the total number of app-based activities participants completed each week, as well as the proportion of days that participants engaged with the app each week. Method: Data were derived from two iterations of a four-week study exploring app engagement in college students (n = 169). This secondary analysis investigated the relationships between general and mindfulness-based app engagement with passive data metrics (sleep duration, home time, and screen duration) at a weekly level, as well as the relationship between demographics and engagement. Additional clinically focused analysis was performed on three case studies of participants with high mindfulness activity completion. Results: Demographic variables such as gender, race/ethnicity, and age lacked a significant association with mindfulness app-based engagement. Passive data variables such as sleep and screen duration were significant predictors for different metrics of general and mindfulness-based app engagement at a weekly level. There was a significant interaction effect for screen duration between the number of mindfulness activities completed and whether or not the participant received a mindfulness notification. K-means clusters analyses using passive data features to predict mindfulness activity completion had low performance. Conclusions: While there are no simple solutions to predicting engagement with mindfulness apps, utilizing digital phenotyping approaches at a population and personal level offers new potential. The signal from digital phenotyping warrants more investigation; even small increases in engagement with mindfulness apps may have a tremendous impact given their already high prevalence of engagement, availability, and potential to engage patients across demographics.