首页 > 最新文献

Behavioural Public Policy最新文献

英文 中文
EAST framework to promote adherence to nutritional supplementation: a strategy to mitigate COVID-19 within health workers 促进坚持营养补充的 EAST 框架:减轻卫生工作者体内 COVID-19 的战略
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.11
John Arboleda, Luis F. Jaramillo, Alexander Velez, Juan E. Restrepo
Cooperative and caring behaviors are key drivers of human social progress, especially during catastrophes or pandemic events. While COVID-19 pandemics was arriving to Colombia in absence of any approved therapeutic strategy or vaccine, and based on evidence from other viral diseases, we anticipated to hypothesize the protective role of some nutritional supplements such as Vitamin D and C against SARS-CoV2. Therefore, for health workers, we proposed a voluntarily nutritional supplementation plan to fortify their immune system aiming to prevent or mitigate eventual COVID-19 infection and disease. Using the behavioral EAST framework, all our health workers (n = 1,063) were invited via email to participate voluntarily in a supplementation strategy for a period of 3 months. 77.4% accepted participation, and among them, we identified a group with optimal adherence to the proposed supplementation plan (20%) and a predominant group with no adherence at all (57.29%). Adherence seemed to be associated to a risk perception bias that was predominant in female workers and those workers performing in working areas with higher risk of infection. Of importance, adherence to the supplementation strategy was associated to a lower percentage of COVID-19 diagnostics (12%) as compared with that observed in non-adherence participants (19%). Moreover, the sustained adherence during the time of intervention seemed to promote adoption of this target behavior, as up to 35% of the adherent participants remained attached (on their own) to the supplementation habit, 3 months after the end of the intervention. All these data show the potential relevance of EAST frameworks as tools to trigger health care and altruistic behaviors to avoid the spread of pandemic diseases. In line with other authors, our observations suggest that nutritional vitamin D and C supplementation could mitigate the risk of COVID-19, highlighting the behavioral and biological relevance of this type of interventions during emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases.
合作和关爱行为是人类社会进步的主要推动力,尤其是在灾难或流行病事件期间。在 COVID-19 大流行尚未得到任何批准的治疗策略或疫苗的情况下,我们根据其他病毒性疾病的证据,推测一些营养补充剂(如维生素 D 和 C)对 SARS-CoV2 的保护作用。因此,我们为医务工作者提出了一个自愿补充营养的计划,以增强他们的免疫系统,从而预防或减轻最终的 COVID-19 感染和疾病。利用行为 EAST 框架,我们通过电子邮件邀请所有医务工作者(n = 1,063)自愿参与为期 3 个月的营养补充策略。77.4%的医务人员接受了邀请,其中,我们发现有一组医务人员对建议的补充剂计划有最佳的依从性(20%),而另一组医务人员则完全没有依从性(57.29%)。坚持与否似乎与风险认知偏差有关,这种偏差主要发生在女工和在感染风险较高的工作区域工作的工人身上。重要的是,与未坚持补充策略的参与者(19%)相比,坚持补充策略的参与者COVID-19诊断率较低(12%)。此外,干预期间的持续坚持似乎也促进了这一目标行为的采用,因为在干预结束 3 个月后,多达 35% 的坚持参与者仍然(自行)坚持补充营养的习惯。所有这些数据都表明,EAST 框架作为激发保健和利他行为以避免流行病传播的工具,具有潜在的相关性。与其他作者的观点一致,我们的观察结果表明,补充营养维生素 D 和 C 可以降低 COVID-19 的风险,这突出表明了在新发或再发传染病期间,这类干预措施在行为和生物学方面的相关性。
{"title":"EAST framework to promote adherence to nutritional supplementation: a strategy to mitigate COVID-19 within health workers","authors":"John Arboleda, Luis F. Jaramillo, Alexander Velez, Juan E. Restrepo","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.11","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Cooperative and caring behaviors are key drivers of human social progress, especially during catastrophes or pandemic events. While COVID-19 pandemics was arriving to Colombia in absence of any approved therapeutic strategy or vaccine, and based on evidence from other viral diseases, we anticipated to hypothesize the protective role of some nutritional supplements such as Vitamin D and C against SARS-CoV2. Therefore, for health workers, we proposed a voluntarily nutritional supplementation plan to fortify their immune system aiming to prevent or mitigate eventual COVID-19 infection and disease. Using the behavioral EAST framework, all our health workers (n = 1,063) were invited via email to participate voluntarily in a supplementation strategy for a period of 3 months. 77.4% accepted participation, and among them, we identified a group with optimal adherence to the proposed supplementation plan (20%) and a predominant group with no adherence at all (57.29%). Adherence seemed to be associated to a risk perception bias that was predominant in female workers and those workers performing in working areas with higher risk of infection. Of importance, adherence to the supplementation strategy was associated to a lower percentage of COVID-19 diagnostics (12%) as compared with that observed in non-adherence participants (19%). Moreover, the sustained adherence during the time of intervention seemed to promote adoption of this target behavior, as up to 35% of the adherent participants remained attached (on their own) to the supplementation habit, 3 months after the end of the intervention. All these data show the potential relevance of EAST frameworks as tools to trigger health care and altruistic behaviors to avoid the spread of pandemic diseases. In line with other authors, our observations suggest that nutritional vitamin D and C supplementation could mitigate the risk of COVID-19, highlighting the behavioral and biological relevance of this type of interventions during emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140245508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Transparency and nudging: an overview and methodological critique of empirical investigations 透明度与引导:对经验调查的综述和方法论批判
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.7
Patrik Michaelsen
Transparency is intimately linked to debates about the ethics, political legitimacy and effectiveness of nudging. This paper provides an overview of empirical studies investigating how changes in the transparency of a nudge affect people's choices and evaluations of the nudge. I conclude that the present literature provides generally consistent evidence supporting that the effectiveness of a nudge does not decrease when choosers are given good opportunity to detect and understand the influence it might have on their choices. However, several conceptual and methodological issues are identified, significantly limiting the scope of the conclusions that can be drawn. The limitations are discussed and organized into six themes, with recommendations provided for how future research may address them.
透明度与有关劝导的道德、政治合法性和有效性的争论密切相关。本文概述了一些实证研究,这些研究调查了劝导透明度的变化如何影响人们的选择和对劝导的评价。我的结论是,目前的文献提供了基本一致的证据,即当选择者有良好的机会发现并理解劝导对其选择可能产生的影响时,劝导的有效性并不会降低。然而,我们也发现了一些概念和方法上的问题,这些问题极大地限制了我们得出结论的范围。本文对这些限制因素进行了讨论,并将其归纳为六个主题,同时就未来研究如何解决这些问题提出了建议。
{"title":"Transparency and nudging: an overview and methodological critique of empirical investigations","authors":"Patrik Michaelsen","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.7","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Transparency is intimately linked to debates about the ethics, political legitimacy and effectiveness of nudging. This paper provides an overview of empirical studies investigating how changes in the transparency of a nudge affect people's choices and evaluations of the nudge. I conclude that the present literature provides generally consistent evidence supporting that the effectiveness of a nudge does not decrease when choosers are given good opportunity to detect and understand the influence it might have on their choices. However, several conceptual and methodological issues are identified, significantly limiting the scope of the conclusions that can be drawn. The limitations are discussed and organized into six themes, with recommendations provided for how future research may address them.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140245923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Behavioral finance impacts on US stock market volatility: an analysis of market anomalies 行为金融学对美国股市波动性的影响:对市场异常现象的分析
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.13
Isik Akin, Meryem Akin
This study investigates the impacts of behavioral finance on stock market volatility. The primary aims are to explain the reasons behind changes in the S&P 500 price within the context of behavioral finance and to analyze investor behavior in response to these changes. To achieve this, the research employs time-series analysis over a 10-year period, focusing on the S&P 500, real interest rates, consumer confidence, market volatility and credit default swaps while considering the effects of behavioral biases. The findings reveal several significant correlations: rising real interest rates negatively affect stocks due to loss aversion and sentiment. Conversely, higher consumer confidence tends to positively influence the stock market, driven by herding behavior and optimism. Additionally, market volatility shows a negative correlation with the S&P 500, influenced by risk aversion, recency bias and herding behavior. Moreover, an increase in credit default swap rates leads to stock market declines, primarily influenced by risk perception, loss aversion and herding behavior.
本研究探讨了行为金融学对股市波动的影响。主要目的是在行为金融学的背景下解释标准普尔 500 指数价格变化背后的原因,并分析投资者应对这些变化的行为。为此,研究采用了 10 年的时间序列分析,重点关注标准普尔 500 指数、实际利率、消费者信心、市场波动和信用违约掉期,同时考虑了行为偏差的影响。研究结果显示了几种重要的相关性:由于损失规避和情绪的影响,实际利率的上升会对股票产生负面影响。相反,在羊群行为和乐观情绪的推动下,消费者信心的提高往往会对股市产生积极影响。此外,受风险规避、周期偏差和羊群行为的影响,市场波动与标准普尔 500 指数呈负相关。此外,信用违约掉期利率上升会导致股市下跌,这主要是受风险认知、损失规避和羊群行为的影响。
{"title":"Behavioral finance impacts on US stock market volatility: an analysis of market anomalies","authors":"Isik Akin, Meryem Akin","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.13","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study investigates the impacts of behavioral finance on stock market volatility. The primary aims are to explain the reasons behind changes in the S&P 500 price within the context of behavioral finance and to analyze investor behavior in response to these changes. To achieve this, the research employs time-series analysis over a 10-year period, focusing on the S&P 500, real interest rates, consumer confidence, market volatility and credit default swaps while considering the effects of behavioral biases. The findings reveal several significant correlations: rising real interest rates negatively affect stocks due to loss aversion and sentiment. Conversely, higher consumer confidence tends to positively influence the stock market, driven by herding behavior and optimism. Additionally, market volatility shows a negative correlation with the S&P 500, influenced by risk aversion, recency bias and herding behavior. Moreover, an increase in credit default swap rates leads to stock market declines, primarily influenced by risk perception, loss aversion and herding behavior.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The acceptability of behavioural interventions in financial decision-making 财务决策行为干预的可接受性
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.10
Patricia de Jonge, Olga Ungureanu, M. Zeelenberg, Peeter W. J. Verlegh
Financial policymakers increasingly rely on behavioural insights to protect the interests of consumers. However, little is known about how citizens feel about interventions designed to nudge their financial behaviour. Most literature on the acceptability of behavioural interventions focuses on the health domain. To address this gap, we present the results of an experiment on the acceptability of seven financial behavioural interventions (N = 684, members of a panel of the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets). We investigate the role of the agent implementing the intervention (policymaker versus financial company) and perceived effectiveness in relation to the acceptability of these interventions. The acceptability of behavioural interventions in financial decision-making appears to be lower than the acceptability levels found in previous studies. We find no effect of the agent on acceptability. Perceived effectiveness is strongly correlated with acceptability, but only perceived effectiveness in influencing one's own decisions has a consistently positive relationship with acceptability. Perceived effectiveness in influencing others' decisions has either no, a positive, or a negative relationship with acceptability. These results highlight that acceptability appears to be at least partly domain-specific and show that we have only just begun understanding the acceptability of behavioural interventions and its drivers.
金融政策制定者越来越依赖行为分析来保护消费者的利益。然而,人们对公民如何看待旨在引导其金融行为的干预措施知之甚少。大多数关于行为干预可接受性的文献都集中在健康领域。为了填补这一空白,我们介绍了一项关于七种金融行为干预措施可接受性的实验结果(N = 684,荷兰金融市场管理局小组成员)。我们调查了实施干预措施的代理人(政策制定者与金融公司)的角色以及与这些干预措施的可接受性相关的感知有效性。金融决策中行为干预的可接受性似乎低于以往研究中发现的可接受性水平。我们发现代理人对可接受性没有影响。感知有效性与可接受性密切相关,但只有影响自身决策的感知有效性才与可接受性有持续的正相关关系。影响他人决策的感知有效性与可接受性之间要么没有关系,要么呈正相关,要么呈负相关。这些结果突出表明,可接受性似乎至少有一部分是针对特定领域的,并表明我们对行为干预的可接受性及其驱动因素的了解才刚刚开始。
{"title":"The acceptability of behavioural interventions in financial decision-making","authors":"Patricia de Jonge, Olga Ungureanu, M. Zeelenberg, Peeter W. J. Verlegh","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Financial policymakers increasingly rely on behavioural insights to protect the interests of consumers. However, little is known about how citizens feel about interventions designed to nudge their financial behaviour. Most literature on the acceptability of behavioural interventions focuses on the health domain. To address this gap, we present the results of an experiment on the acceptability of seven financial behavioural interventions (N = 684, members of a panel of the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets). We investigate the role of the agent implementing the intervention (policymaker versus financial company) and perceived effectiveness in relation to the acceptability of these interventions. The acceptability of behavioural interventions in financial decision-making appears to be lower than the acceptability levels found in previous studies. We find no effect of the agent on acceptability. Perceived effectiveness is strongly correlated with acceptability, but only perceived effectiveness in influencing one's own decisions has a consistently positive relationship with acceptability. Perceived effectiveness in influencing others' decisions has either no, a positive, or a negative relationship with acceptability. These results highlight that acceptability appears to be at least partly domain-specific and show that we have only just begun understanding the acceptability of behavioural interventions and its drivers.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Chilling results: how explicit warm glow appeals fail to boost pro-environmental behaviour 令人不寒而栗的结果:明确的暖光呼吁如何无法促进亲环境行为
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.4
Paul M. Lohmann, E. Gsottbauer, Sander van der Linden, Andreas Kontoleon
We conducted a large-scale online experiment to examine whether climate change messaging can induce emotions and motivate pro-environmental action. We study how exposure to explicit positive (‘warm glow’) and negative (‘cold prickle’) emotional appeals as well as a traditional social norm communication affects pro-environmental action. We find that a simple call to take action to mitigate climate change is at least as affective as social norm message framing and emotional appeals. Our results highlight the difficulty of designing messaging interventions that effectively harness emotional incentives to promote pro-environmental action. Messages that explicitly emphasise the personal emotional benefits of contributing to environmental causes or the adverse emotional effects of not doing so seem to fall short of motivating pro-environmental effort. Our findings underscore the need for caution when incorporating emotive appeals into policy interventions.
我们进行了一项大规模的在线实验,以研究气候变化信息是否能诱发情绪并激励人们采取支持环保的行动。我们研究了明确的正面("温暖的光芒")和负面("寒冷的刺痛")情感诉求以及传统的社会规范传播如何影响支持环保的行动。我们发现,简单地呼吁人们采取行动减缓气候变化至少与社会规范信息框架和情感诉求一样具有影响力。我们的研究结果凸显了设计有效利用情感激励来促进亲环境行动的信息干预措施的难度。明确强调为环保事业做出贡献的个人情感利益或不这样做的负面情感影响的信息似乎无法激发人们的环保努力。我们的研究结果表明,在将情感诉求纳入政策干预时需要谨慎。
{"title":"Chilling results: how explicit warm glow appeals fail to boost pro-environmental behaviour","authors":"Paul M. Lohmann, E. Gsottbauer, Sander van der Linden, Andreas Kontoleon","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.4","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 We conducted a large-scale online experiment to examine whether climate change messaging can induce emotions and motivate pro-environmental action. We study how exposure to explicit positive (‘warm glow’) and negative (‘cold prickle’) emotional appeals as well as a traditional social norm communication affects pro-environmental action. We find that a simple call to take action to mitigate climate change is at least as affective as social norm message framing and emotional appeals. Our results highlight the difficulty of designing messaging interventions that effectively harness emotional incentives to promote pro-environmental action. Messages that explicitly emphasise the personal emotional benefits of contributing to environmental causes or the adverse emotional effects of not doing so seem to fall short of motivating pro-environmental effort. Our findings underscore the need for caution when incorporating emotive appeals into policy interventions.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140077607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sticky brown sludge everywhere: can sludge explain barriers to green behaviour? 随处可见的粘稠褐色污泥:污泥能否解释绿色行为的障碍?
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2024.3
G. Shreedhar, Cahal Moran, Stuart Mills
Behavioural science has sought to promote pro-environmental behaviours including climate-friendly dietary change, and to reduce travel emissions and excessive wastes. Nevertheless, there is a debate about how effective behavioural interventions are, and in turn, about the real barriers to enduring pro-environmental behaviour change. In this context, we conceptualise brown sludge as multi-level impediment to pro-environmental behaviour change, which results in higher environmental costs shared by the broader society, rather than solely by the individual actor. We propose that brown sludge comprises an array of additional transaction costs, encompassing, but not restricted to, psychological, temporal, and uncertainty costs. Brown sludge can occur at the individual, social, institutional, and societal levels. Examples include confusing eco-information, delay and disinformation campaigns, and complicated systems and infrastructure leading to carbon lock-in.
行为科学一直在努力促进亲环境行为,包括改变气候友好型饮食习惯,以及减少旅行排放和过度浪费。然而,关于行为干预措施的有效性,以及反过来关于持久的亲环境行为改变的真正障碍,还存在着争论。在此背景下,我们将棕色污泥概念化为多层次的环保行为改变障碍,它导致更高的环境成本由更广泛的社会分担,而非仅由个人行为者分担。我们提出,褐污泥包含一系列额外的交易成本,包括但不限于心理成本、时间成本和不确定性成本。褐污泥可能发生在个人、社会、机构和社会层面。例如,混乱的生态信息、拖延和虚假宣传,以及导致碳锁定的复杂系统和基础设施。
{"title":"Sticky brown sludge everywhere: can sludge explain barriers to green behaviour?","authors":"G. Shreedhar, Cahal Moran, Stuart Mills","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.3","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Behavioural science has sought to promote pro-environmental behaviours including climate-friendly dietary change, and to reduce travel emissions and excessive wastes. Nevertheless, there is a debate about how effective behavioural interventions are, and in turn, about the real barriers to enduring pro-environmental behaviour change. In this context, we conceptualise brown sludge as multi-level impediment to pro-environmental behaviour change, which results in higher environmental costs shared by the broader society, rather than solely by the individual actor. We propose that brown sludge comprises an array of additional transaction costs, encompassing, but not restricted to, psychological, temporal, and uncertainty costs. Brown sludge can occur at the individual, social, institutional, and societal levels. Examples include confusing eco-information, delay and disinformation campaigns, and complicated systems and infrastructure leading to carbon lock-in.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140441853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The effect of timers and precommitments on handwashing: a randomised controlled trial in a kitchen laboratory 计时器和预先承诺对洗手的影响:厨房实验室随机对照试验
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.33
James Thom, Sarah Bowen, Yuchen Yang, Sanjeev Devarajan, Helen Doran, Marios Zampetis, Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, Maria McDonagh, R. McPhedran, Ben Toombs, Ayla Ibrahimi Jarchlo, Alice Rayner, Phil Jones, N. Gold
Many foodborne illness outbreaks originate in food service establishments. We tested two behavioural interventions designed to improve the duration and quality of handwashing. We ran a three-armed parallel trial in a laboratory kitchen, from 7 March to 27 May 2022. Participants were n = 195 workers who handle food. We randomly allocated participants to three groups: Timer – tap-mounted timer that counted seconds while participants washed their hands; Precommitment – agreed to five statements on good hand hygiene before attending the kitchen; and Control. Participants completed a food preparation task under time pressure. Cameras focused on the sink captured handwashing. Outcome measures were number of times participants washed their hands; number of times they washed their hands using soap; number of times they washed using soap and washed the backs of their hands; and mean duration of handwashing attempts using soap. Participants in Timer washed their hands for 1.9 s longer on average than Control (β = 2.20, 95% CI = 0.34-4.06, p = 0.021). Participants in Precommitment washed their hands for 2.5 s longer on average than Control (β = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.33-4.27, p = 0.022). We found no statistically significant differences on any other outcome measure.
许多食源性疾病的爆发都源于餐饮场所。我们测试了两种旨在延长洗手时间和提高洗手质量的行为干预措施。2022 年 3 月 7 日至 5 月 27 日,我们在实验室厨房开展了一项三臂平行试验。参与者为 n = 195 名处理食品的工人。我们将参与者随机分配到三组:定时器组--在参与者洗手时,水龙头安装的定时器以秒为单位计时;预先承诺组--在进入厨房前,同意有关良好手部卫生的五项声明;对照组。参与者在时间压力下完成一项食物准备任务。摄像机对准水槽拍摄洗手过程。结果测量指标包括:参与者洗手的次数;使用肥皂洗手的次数;使用肥皂洗手并清洗手背的次数;使用肥皂洗手的平均持续时间。与对照组相比,定时组的参与者平均洗手时间长 1.9 秒(β = 2.20,95% CI = 0.34-4.06,p = 0.021)。承诺前参与者洗手的平均时间比对照组多 2.5 秒(β = 2.30,95% CI = 0.33-4.27,p = 0.022)。我们没有发现其他任何结果测量上的显著差异。
{"title":"The effect of timers and precommitments on handwashing: a randomised controlled trial in a kitchen laboratory","authors":"James Thom, Sarah Bowen, Yuchen Yang, Sanjeev Devarajan, Helen Doran, Marios Zampetis, Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, Maria McDonagh, R. McPhedran, Ben Toombs, Ayla Ibrahimi Jarchlo, Alice Rayner, Phil Jones, N. Gold","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.33","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Many foodborne illness outbreaks originate in food service establishments. We tested two behavioural interventions designed to improve the duration and quality of handwashing. We ran a three-armed parallel trial in a laboratory kitchen, from 7 March to 27 May 2022. Participants were n = 195 workers who handle food. We randomly allocated participants to three groups: Timer – tap-mounted timer that counted seconds while participants washed their hands; Precommitment – agreed to five statements on good hand hygiene before attending the kitchen; and Control. Participants completed a food preparation task under time pressure. Cameras focused on the sink captured handwashing. Outcome measures were number of times participants washed their hands; number of times they washed their hands using soap; number of times they washed using soap and washed the backs of their hands; and mean duration of handwashing attempts using soap. Participants in Timer washed their hands for 1.9 s longer on average than Control (β = 2.20, 95% CI = 0.34-4.06, p = 0.021). Participants in Precommitment washed their hands for 2.5 s longer on average than Control (β = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.33-4.27, p = 0.022). We found no statistically significant differences on any other outcome measure.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139439833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beliefs, observability and donation revision in charitable giving: evidence from an online experiment 慈善捐赠中的信念、可观察性和捐赠修正:来自在线实验的证据
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.36
Guanlin Gao, Xinyan Shi
This study examines how beliefs interact with heterogeneous donation preferences in determining people's donation decisions and choices of revision and observability. We conducted an online experiment eliciting participants’ first-order beliefs, that is, beliefs about an average donor's contribution, with the opportunity of being recognized. We also provided the opportunity for donation revision to a group of randomly selected participants. Our study results show that people's first-order beliefs are positively correlated with their willingness to donate and their actual donations. Moreover, first-order beliefs also interact with people's heterogeneous donation preferences in jointly determining their decisions of donation revision and observability – their tendency to opt in for public recognition. Donors with low first-order beliefs and high donation preferences are most likely to opt in for recognition, but they are unlikely to revise their donations. Donors with high first-order beliefs and low donation preferences are most likely to revise their donations, but they are less likely to choose to be recognized. Donors with low first-order beliefs and low donation preferences display the lowest tendency toward revision and observability.
本研究探讨了信念如何与异质性捐赠偏好相互作用,从而决定人们的捐赠决策以及对修订和可观察性的选择。我们进行了一项在线实验,激发参与者的一阶信念,即对捐赠者平均捐赠额的信念,并使其有机会得到认可。我们还为一组随机抽取的参与者提供了修改捐款的机会。我们的研究结果表明,人们的一阶信念与他们的捐赠意愿和实际捐赠量呈正相关。此外,一阶信念还与人们的异质性捐赠偏好相互影响,共同决定了他们修改捐赠的决定和可观察性--他们选择接受公众认可的倾向。一阶信念低而捐赠偏好高的捐赠者最有可能选择接受认可,但他们不太可能修改自己的捐赠。一阶信念高而捐赠偏好低的捐赠者最有可能修改其捐赠,但他们不太可能选择被认可。低一阶信念和低捐赠偏好的捐赠者对修改和可观察性的倾向最低。
{"title":"Beliefs, observability and donation revision in charitable giving: evidence from an online experiment","authors":"Guanlin Gao, Xinyan Shi","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.36","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study examines how beliefs interact with heterogeneous donation preferences in determining people's donation decisions and choices of revision and observability. We conducted an online experiment eliciting participants’ first-order beliefs, that is, beliefs about an average donor's contribution, with the opportunity of being recognized. We also provided the opportunity for donation revision to a group of randomly selected participants. Our study results show that people's first-order beliefs are positively correlated with their willingness to donate and their actual donations. Moreover, first-order beliefs also interact with people's heterogeneous donation preferences in jointly determining their decisions of donation revision and observability – their tendency to opt in for public recognition. Donors with low first-order beliefs and high donation preferences are most likely to opt in for recognition, but they are unlikely to revise their donations. Donors with high first-order beliefs and low donation preferences are most likely to revise their donations, but they are less likely to choose to be recognized. Donors with low first-order beliefs and low donation preferences display the lowest tendency toward revision and observability.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139441935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest 披露的悖论:将政策从揭示利益冲突转向解决利益冲突
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.37
Sunita Sah
This paper explores the complexities and unintended consequences of conflict of interest (COI) disclosures in various professional settings. It highlights key psychological processes encountered by recipients of such disclosures. Notably, it describes the burden of disclosure effect, which paradoxically reduces trust while increasing compliance due to social pressures, and disclosure's expertise cue, where disclosures inadvertently increase trust and persuasiveness by signalling expertise. The paper also outlines best practices for improving COI disclosures, emphasising the need for external third-party involvement and encouraging deliberation. It concludes that effective disclosure depends not only on how recipients process information but also critically on how the disclosure influences the behaviour of advisors, underscoring the need for a holistic approach to managing COIs that goes beyond mere transparency. A version of this paper was presented as a keynote at the Second Annual International Behavioural Public Policy Conference at the University of North Carolina in September 2023.
本文探讨了各种专业环境中利益冲突(COI)披露的复杂性和意外后果。它强调了此类披露的接受者所遇到的关键心理过程。值得注意的是,它描述了披露负担效应,这种效应在增加合规性的同时却因社会压力而降低了信任度;还描述了披露的专业知识线索,在这种线索下,披露会在不经意间通过发出专业知识信号而增加信任度和说服力。论文还概述了改进公司责任披露的最佳做法,强调了外部第三方参与和鼓励审议的必要性。论文的结论是,有效的信息披露不仅取决于信息接收者如何处理信息,关键还在于信息披露如何影响顾问的行为,这就强调了有必要采取一种超越单纯透明度的整体方法来管理公司责任声明。本文的一个版本已于 2023 年 9 月在北卡罗来纳大学举行的第二届国际行为公共政策年会上作为主题演讲发表。
{"title":"The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest","authors":"Sunita Sah","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.37","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper explores the complexities and unintended consequences of conflict of interest (COI) disclosures in various professional settings. It highlights key psychological processes encountered by recipients of such disclosures. Notably, it describes the burden of disclosure effect, which paradoxically reduces trust while increasing compliance due to social pressures, and disclosure's expertise cue, where disclosures inadvertently increase trust and persuasiveness by signalling expertise. The paper also outlines best practices for improving COI disclosures, emphasising the need for external third-party involvement and encouraging deliberation. It concludes that effective disclosure depends not only on how recipients process information but also critically on how the disclosure influences the behaviour of advisors, underscoring the need for a holistic approach to managing COIs that goes beyond mere transparency. A version of this paper was presented as a keynote at the Second Annual International Behavioural Public Policy Conference at the University of North Carolina in September 2023.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138945472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Harnessing heterogeneity in behavioural research using computational social science 在行为研究中利用计算社会科学的异质性
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.35
Giuseppe A. Veltri
Similarly to other domains of the social sciences, behavioural science has grappled with a crisis concerning the effect sizes of research findings. Different solutions have been provided to answer this challenge. This paper will discuss analytical strategies developed in the context of computational social science, namely causal tree and forest, that will benefit behavioural scientists in harnessing heterogeneity of treatment effects in RCTs. As a mixture of theoretical and data-driven approaches, these techniques are well suited to exploit the rich information provided by large studies conducted using RCTs. We discuss the characteristics of these methods and their methodological rationale and provide simulations to illustrate their use. We simulate two scenarios of RCTs-generated data and explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects using causal tree and causal forest methods. Furthermore, we outlined a potential theoretical use of these techniques to enrich behavioural science ecological validity by introducing the notion of behavioural niche.
与社会科学的其他领域类似,行为科学也面临着研究结果效应大小的危机。已经提供了不同的解决方案来应对这一挑战。本文将讨论在计算社会科学背景下开发的分析策略,即因果树和森林,这将有利于行为科学家利用随机对照试验中治疗效果的异质性。作为理论和数据驱动方法的混合,这些技术非常适合利用使用随机对照试验进行的大型研究提供的丰富信息。我们讨论了这些方法的特点和它们的方法原理,并提供模拟来说明它们的使用。我们模拟了rct生成数据的两种情况,并使用因果树和因果森林方法探索治疗效果的异质性。此外,我们概述了这些技术的潜在理论用途,通过引入行为生态位的概念来丰富行为科学的生态有效性。
{"title":"Harnessing heterogeneity in behavioural research using computational social science","authors":"Giuseppe A. Veltri","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.35","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Similarly to other domains of the social sciences, behavioural science has grappled with a crisis concerning the effect sizes of research findings. Different solutions have been provided to answer this challenge. This paper will discuss analytical strategies developed in the context of computational social science, namely causal tree and forest, that will benefit behavioural scientists in harnessing heterogeneity of treatment effects in RCTs. As a mixture of theoretical and data-driven approaches, these techniques are well suited to exploit the rich information provided by large studies conducted using RCTs. We discuss the characteristics of these methods and their methodological rationale and provide simulations to illustrate their use. We simulate two scenarios of RCTs-generated data and explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects using causal tree and causal forest methods. Furthermore, we outlined a potential theoretical use of these techniques to enrich behavioural science ecological validity by introducing the notion of behavioural niche.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138601826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Behavioural Public Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1