首页 > 最新文献

Behavioural Public Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Deposit? Yes, please! The effect of different modes of assigning reward- and deposit-based financial incentives on effort 存款吗?是的,请!分配奖励和存款为基础的财务激励的不同模式对努力的影响
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.22
S. Lipman, N. Boderie, J. Been, H. van Kippersluis
The effectiveness and uptake of financial incentives can differ substantially between reward- and deposit-based incentives. Therefore, it is unclear to whom and how different incentives should be assigned. In this study, the effect of different modes of assigning reward- and deposit-based financial incentives on effort is explored in a two-session experiment. First, students’ (n = 228, recruited online) discounting, loss aversion and willingness to pay a deposit were elicited. Second, an incentivized real-effort task was completed (n = 171, 25% drop-out). Two modes of assigning reward- or deposit-based financial incentives were compared: random assignment and ‘nudged’ assignment – assignment based on respondent characteristics allowing opting out. Our results show that respondents receiving nudged assignment earned more and persisted longer on the real-effort task than respondents randomly assigned to incentives. We find no differences in effectiveness between reward-based or deposit-based incentives. Overall, 39% of respondents in the nudged assignment mode followed-up the advice to take deposit-based incentives. The effect of deposit-based incentives was larger for the respondents who followed-up the advice than for respondents that randomly received deposit-based incentives. Overall, these findings suggest that nudged assignment may increase incentives’ effect on effort. Future work should extend this approach to other contexts (e.g., behaviour change).
在以奖励和存款为基础的奖励之间,财政奖励的有效性和接受程度可能有很大差别。因此,不清楚应该向谁以及如何分配不同的激励。在本研究中,通过两个阶段的实验,探讨了不同的基于奖励和存款的财务激励模式对努力的影响。首先,激发学生(n = 228,在线招募)的折扣、损失厌恶和支付押金的意愿。第二,完成一项激励的实际努力任务(n = 171, 25%退出)。两种模式的分配奖励或存款为基础的财政激励进行了比较:随机分配和“轻推”分配-分配基于受访者的特点,允许选择退出。我们的研究结果表明,接受轻推任务的受访者比随机分配给奖励的受访者赚得更多,在真正努力的任务上坚持的时间更长。我们发现基于奖励或基于存款的激励在有效性上没有差异。总体而言,39%的“轻推分配”模式的受访者按照建议采取了基于存款的激励措施。基于存款的激励对那些跟进建议的受访者的影响要大于随机接受基于存款的激励的受访者。总的来说,这些发现表明,轻推任务可能会增加激励对努力的影响。未来的工作应该将这种方法扩展到其他环境(例如,行为改变)。
{"title":"Deposit? Yes, please! The effect of different modes of assigning reward- and deposit-based financial incentives on effort","authors":"S. Lipman, N. Boderie, J. Been, H. van Kippersluis","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.22","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The effectiveness and uptake of financial incentives can differ substantially between reward- and deposit-based incentives. Therefore, it is unclear to whom and how different incentives should be assigned. In this study, the effect of different modes of assigning reward- and deposit-based financial incentives on effort is explored in a two-session experiment. First, students’ (n = 228, recruited online) discounting, loss aversion and willingness to pay a deposit were elicited. Second, an incentivized real-effort task was completed (n = 171, 25% drop-out). Two modes of assigning reward- or deposit-based financial incentives were compared: random assignment and ‘nudged’ assignment – assignment based on respondent characteristics allowing opting out. Our results show that respondents receiving nudged assignment earned more and persisted longer on the real-effort task than respondents randomly assigned to incentives. We find no differences in effectiveness between reward-based or deposit-based incentives. Overall, 39% of respondents in the nudged assignment mode followed-up the advice to take deposit-based incentives. The effect of deposit-based incentives was larger for the respondents who followed-up the advice than for respondents that randomly received deposit-based incentives. Overall, these findings suggest that nudged assignment may increase incentives’ effect on effort. Future work should extend this approach to other contexts (e.g., behaviour change).","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47501031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transactional fairness in consumer markets 消费市场中的交易公平
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.23
B. Lyons, R. Sugden
There is growing public concern about the ‘unfairness’ of many pricing practices that have become common in consumer, particularly digital, markets. Industrial and behavioural economists have developed theories that explain the conditions under which these practices are profitable for firms, and their implications for consumer welfare. We identify a mismatch between the welfare economic principles used in this theoretical work and the normative perspective in which these practices are viewed as unfair. We develop a concept of ‘transactional fairness’, grounded in the normative approach of Sugden's Community of Advantage, that is reflective of public concerns. Transactional fairness is complementary to established criteria of economic efficiency and distributional equity but is based entirely on the relationship between individual buyers and sellers. It establishes clear principles with realistic information requirements that are appropriate for compliance by firms. Regulation based on this approach can help to restore public faith in markets.
公众越来越担心许多定价做法的“不公平”,这些做法在消费者市场,尤其是数字市场中很常见。工业和行为经济学家已经发展出了一些理论,解释了这些做法对企业盈利的条件,以及它们对消费者福利的影响。我们发现,这项理论工作中使用的福利经济原则与这些做法被视为不公平的规范观点不匹配。我们发展了一个“交易公平”的概念,该概念基于Sugden的优势社区的规范方法,反映了公众的担忧。交易公平是对既定的经济效率和分配公平标准的补充,但完全基于个人买家和卖家之间的关系。它建立了明确的原则和切合实际的信息要求,适合公司遵守。基于这种方法的监管有助于恢复公众对市场的信心。
{"title":"Transactional fairness in consumer markets","authors":"B. Lyons, R. Sugden","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 There is growing public concern about the ‘unfairness’ of many pricing practices that have become common in consumer, particularly digital, markets. Industrial and behavioural economists have developed theories that explain the conditions under which these practices are profitable for firms, and their implications for consumer welfare. We identify a mismatch between the welfare economic principles used in this theoretical work and the normative perspective in which these practices are viewed as unfair. We develop a concept of ‘transactional fairness’, grounded in the normative approach of Sugden's Community of Advantage, that is reflective of public concerns. Transactional fairness is complementary to established criteria of economic efficiency and distributional equity but is based entirely on the relationship between individual buyers and sellers. It establishes clear principles with realistic information requirements that are appropriate for compliance by firms. Regulation based on this approach can help to restore public faith in markets.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48959880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The antipaternalist psychology of William James 威廉·詹姆斯的反家长主义心理学
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.20
M. Rizzo
The purpose of this paper is to first review William James's explicit positions on paternalism in the context of medical licensure and the annexation of the Philippines. Then I wish to show that these positions, as well as a more generalized antipaternalist stance, are the implications of James's philosophy and psychology and not simply his ‘personal’ sentiments. The elements of James's thought are arranged in such a way as to facilitate a comparison with contemporary behavioral (heuristics and biases) paternalism. The conclusion is that James has arguments against behavioral paternalism avant la lettre that are still useful and deserve discussion.
本文的目的是首先回顾威廉·詹姆斯在医疗执照和菲律宾吞并的背景下对家长制的明确立场。然后,我希望表明,这些立场,以及更普遍的反家长主义立场,是詹姆斯的哲学和心理学的含义,而不仅仅是他的“个人”情绪。詹姆斯的思想要素以这样一种方式安排,以便于与当代行为(启发式和偏见)家长式作风进行比较。结论是,詹姆斯反对行为家长主义的观点在文学上仍然是有用的,值得讨论。
{"title":"The antipaternalist psychology of William James","authors":"M. Rizzo","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.20","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The purpose of this paper is to first review William James's explicit positions on paternalism in the context of medical licensure and the annexation of the Philippines. Then I wish to show that these positions, as well as a more generalized antipaternalist stance, are the implications of James's philosophy and psychology and not simply his ‘personal’ sentiments. The elements of James's thought are arranged in such a way as to facilitate a comparison with contemporary behavioral (heuristics and biases) paternalism. The conclusion is that James has arguments against behavioral paternalism avant la lettre that are still useful and deserve discussion.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47201030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A symposium on the behavioural limits of the state 关于国家行为限制的讨论会
Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.17
Adam Oliver
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
此内容没有摘要。当您可以访问此内容时,该页上会提供完整的HTML内容。此内容的PDF也可以通过“保存PDF”操作按钮获得。
{"title":"A symposium on the behavioural limits of the state","authors":"Adam Oliver","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.17","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135743003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nudges can be both autonomy-preserving and effective: evidence from a survey and quasi-field experiment Nudges既可以保持自主性,也可以有效:来自调查和准现场实验的证据
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.18
Henrico van Roekel, Laura M. Giurge, C. Schott, L. Tummers
Nudges are widely employed tools within organizations, but they are often criticized for harming autonomy and for being ineffective. We assess these two criticisms simultaneously: can nudges be both autonomy-preserving and effective in changing behavior? We developed three nudges – an opinion leader nudge, a rule-of-thumb and self-nudges – to reduce a particularly sticky behavior: email use. In a survey experiment of 4,112 healthcare employees, we tested their effect on perceived autonomy and subjective effectiveness. We also tested traditional policy instruments for comparison. Next, to assess objective effectiveness, we conducted a quasi-field experiment in a large healthcare organization with an estimate of 1,189 active email users. We found that each nudge in isolation, but especially when combined, was perceived to be both autonomy-preserving and effective, and more so than traditional policy instruments like an access limit or a monetary reward. We also found some evidence that the combination of all nudges decreased actual email use. This paper advances the literature by showing how innovations in nudge design improve nudges’ ability to be autonomy-preserving and effective.
Nudges是组织内广泛使用的工具,但它们经常被批评为损害自主性和无效。我们同时评估这两种批评:轻推既能保持自主性,又能有效改变行为吗?我们开发了三种轻推——意见领袖轻推、经验法则和自我轻推——以减少一种特别棘手的行为:电子邮件使用。在一项针对4112名医护人员的调查实验中,我们测试了他们对感知自主性和主观有效性的影响。我们还测试了传统的政策工具进行比较。接下来,为了评估客观有效性,我们在一家大型医疗保健组织中进行了一项准现场实验,估计有1189名活跃的电子邮件用户。我们发现,每一次单独的推动,尤其是结合在一起的推动,都被认为是保持自主性和有效的,而且比准入限制或货币奖励等传统政策工具更有效。我们还发现一些证据表明,所有轻推的组合减少了实际的电子邮件使用。本文通过展示推送设计的创新如何提高推送者保持自主性和有效性的能力来推进文献。
{"title":"Nudges can be both autonomy-preserving and effective: evidence from a survey and quasi-field experiment","authors":"Henrico van Roekel, Laura M. Giurge, C. Schott, L. Tummers","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.18","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Nudges are widely employed tools within organizations, but they are often criticized for harming autonomy and for being ineffective. We assess these two criticisms simultaneously: can nudges be both autonomy-preserving and effective in changing behavior? We developed three nudges – an opinion leader nudge, a rule-of-thumb and self-nudges – to reduce a particularly sticky behavior: email use. In a survey experiment of 4,112 healthcare employees, we tested their effect on perceived autonomy and subjective effectiveness. We also tested traditional policy instruments for comparison. Next, to assess objective effectiveness, we conducted a quasi-field experiment in a large healthcare organization with an estimate of 1,189 active email users. We found that each nudge in isolation, but especially when combined, was perceived to be both autonomy-preserving and effective, and more so than traditional policy instruments like an access limit or a monetary reward. We also found some evidence that the combination of all nudges decreased actual email use. This paper advances the literature by showing how innovations in nudge design improve nudges’ ability to be autonomy-preserving and effective.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49441836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A behavioural investigation of the substitution phenomenon between tax-sheltered savings plans 避税储蓄计划之间替代现象的行为调查
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.16
L. Berger, Jonathan Farrar, Lu Y. Zhang, Joanna Andrejkow
We provide behavioral insights into the economic substitution phenomenon among front-loaded and back-loaded tax-sheltered savings plans. We conduct three behavioral studies with adult Canadian participants to show experimentally that substitution can occur and to explain why substitution can occur. The first study shows that participants transfer savings from a front-loaded plan to a back-loaded plan when the latter becomes available, consistent with a substitution effect. The second study examines how participants trade-off two unique features of back-loaded and front-loaded savings plans. Our results indicate that participants favor the back-loaded tax feature and a variable contribution limit (offered in a front-loaded plan). As participants prefer one feature from each type of plan, this finding can help explain why substitution occurs. The third study provides participants a categorization task with various household budgeting items, including savings items. Results show that 68.1% of participants categorize multiple tax-sheltered savings plans in the same mental account, again consistent with a substitution effect under a budget constraint. As both tax-sheltered savings plans in Canada are used for different purposes, this finding shows that participants tend not to distinguish between the purpose of saving in each account, consistent with a substitution phenomenon.
我们提供的行为洞察经济替代现象之间的前负荷和后负荷避税储蓄计划。我们对加拿大成年参与者进行了三项行为研究,以实验方式表明替代可以发生,并解释替代为什么会发生。第一项研究表明,当后备计划可用时,参与者会将储蓄从后备计划转移到后备计划,这与替代效应是一致的。第二项研究考察了参与者如何权衡后加载和前加载储蓄计划的两个独特特征。我们的研究结果表明,参与者倾向于后加载的税收特征和可变的贡献限制(在前端加载计划中提供)。由于参与者更喜欢每种计划的一个特征,这一发现可以帮助解释为什么会发生替代。第三项研究为参与者提供了各种家庭预算项目的分类任务,包括储蓄项目。结果显示,68.1%的参与者将多个避税储蓄计划分类在同一个心理账户中,这再次与预算约束下的替代效应相一致。由于加拿大的两种避税储蓄计划用于不同的目的,这一发现表明,参与者往往不区分每个账户的储蓄目的,这与替代现象是一致的。
{"title":"A behavioural investigation of the substitution phenomenon between tax-sheltered savings plans","authors":"L. Berger, Jonathan Farrar, Lu Y. Zhang, Joanna Andrejkow","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.16","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 We provide behavioral insights into the economic substitution phenomenon among front-loaded and back-loaded tax-sheltered savings plans. We conduct three behavioral studies with adult Canadian participants to show experimentally that substitution can occur and to explain why substitution can occur. The first study shows that participants transfer savings from a front-loaded plan to a back-loaded plan when the latter becomes available, consistent with a substitution effect. The second study examines how participants trade-off two unique features of back-loaded and front-loaded savings plans. Our results indicate that participants favor the back-loaded tax feature and a variable contribution limit (offered in a front-loaded plan). As participants prefer one feature from each type of plan, this finding can help explain why substitution occurs. The third study provides participants a categorization task with various household budgeting items, including savings items. Results show that 68.1% of participants categorize multiple tax-sheltered savings plans in the same mental account, again consistent with a substitution effect under a budget constraint. As both tax-sheltered savings plans in Canada are used for different purposes, this finding shows that participants tend not to distinguish between the purpose of saving in each account, consistent with a substitution phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42997296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Behavioural public policies for the social brain 社会大脑的行为公共政策
Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.15
Sanchayan Banerjee, Siddhartha Mitra
Abstract Behavioural public policy is increasingly interested in scaling-up experimental insights to deliver systemic changes. Recent evidence shows some forms of individual behaviour change, such as nudging, are limited in scale. We argue that we can scale-up individual behaviour change by accounting for nuanced social complexities in which human responses to behavioural public policies are situated. We introduce the idea of the ‘social brain’, as a construct to help practitioners and policymakers facilitate a greater social transmission of welfare-improving behaviours. The social brain is a collection of individual human brains, who are connected to other human brains through ‘social cues’, and who are affected by the material and immaterial properties of the physical environment in which they are situated (‘social complex’). Ignoring these cues and the social complex runs the risk of fostering localised behavioural changes, through individual actors, which are neither scalable nor lasting. We identify pathways to facilitate changes in the social brain: either through path dependencies or critical mass shifts in individual behaviours, moderated by the brain's property of social cohesion and multiplicity of situational and dispositional factors. In this way, behavioural changes stimulated in one part of the social brain can reach other parts and evolve dynamically. We recommend designing public policies that engage different parts of the social brain.
行为公共政策对扩大实验见解以实现系统性变革越来越感兴趣。最近的证据表明,某些形式的个人行为改变,如轻推,在规模上是有限的。我们认为,通过考虑人类对行为公共政策的反应所处的微妙社会复杂性,我们可以扩大个人行为改变的规模。我们引入了“社会大脑”的概念,作为一种结构来帮助从业者和政策制定者促进福利改善行为的更大的社会传播。社会大脑是个体人类大脑的集合,这些个体通过“社会线索”与其他人类大脑联系在一起,并受到他们所处的物理环境的物质和非物质属性(“社会情结”)的影响。忽视这些线索和社会复杂性有可能通过个体行为者促进局部行为变化,这种变化既不可扩展也不可持久。我们确定了促进社会大脑变化的途径:要么通过路径依赖,要么通过个体行为的临界质量转变,由大脑的社会凝聚力属性和情境和性格因素的多样性调节。通过这种方式,在社会大脑的一部分受到刺激的行为变化可以到达其他部分并动态进化。我们建议设计公共政策,让社会大脑的不同部分参与进来。
{"title":"Behavioural public policies for the social brain","authors":"Sanchayan Banerjee, Siddhartha Mitra","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.15","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Behavioural public policy is increasingly interested in scaling-up experimental insights to deliver systemic changes. Recent evidence shows some forms of individual behaviour change, such as nudging, are limited in scale. We argue that we can scale-up individual behaviour change by accounting for nuanced social complexities in which human responses to behavioural public policies are situated. We introduce the idea of the ‘social brain’, as a construct to help practitioners and policymakers facilitate a greater social transmission of welfare-improving behaviours. The social brain is a collection of individual human brains, who are connected to other human brains through ‘social cues’, and who are affected by the material and immaterial properties of the physical environment in which they are situated (‘social complex’). Ignoring these cues and the social complex runs the risk of fostering localised behavioural changes, through individual actors, which are neither scalable nor lasting. We identify pathways to facilitate changes in the social brain: either through path dependencies or critical mass shifts in individual behaviours, moderated by the brain's property of social cohesion and multiplicity of situational and dispositional factors. In this way, behavioural changes stimulated in one part of the social brain can reach other parts and evolve dynamically. We recommend designing public policies that engage different parts of the social brain.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135568382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
John A. List: The Voltage Effect—How to Make Good Ideas Great and Great Ideas Scale New York, NY, Currency, 2022, 288 pp. 约翰A.李斯特:《电压效应——如何让好想法变得伟大》,纽约,纽约,货币,2022,288页。
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.14
Nopadol Rompho
{"title":"John A. List: The Voltage Effect—How to Make Good Ideas Great and Great Ideas Scale New York, NY, Currency, 2022, 288 pp.","authors":"Nopadol Rompho","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42812053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Norm nudging and twisting preferences 规范轻推和扭曲偏好
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.5
C. Bicchieri
Abstract Public policies often involve “norm nudging”, the use of norm information to steer individual behavior in a prosocial direction. Analysis of social norm messaging often concentrates on the outcome measure: the potential change in behavior. The cognitive and psychological processes that underlie individuals’ response to norm information, especially the inferences they draw, are usually overlooked. This knowledge gap may lead to adverse consequences, such as messages backfiring. To (factually) justify norm nudging interventions, it is essential that policymakers understand the complex mechanisms that link context, social expectations and preferences, and how the interpretation of different types of messages affects behavior.
摘要公共政策通常涉及“规范推动”,即利用规范信息引导个人行为朝着亲社会的方向发展。对社会规范信息的分析通常集中在结果衡量上:行为的潜在变化。作为个体对规范信息反应的基础的认知和心理过程,尤其是他们得出的推论,通常被忽视。这种知识差距可能会导致不利后果,例如信息适得其反。为了(事实上)证明规范推动干预的合理性,决策者必须了解将背景、社会期望和偏好联系起来的复杂机制,以及对不同类型信息的解释如何影响行为。
{"title":"Norm nudging and twisting preferences","authors":"C. Bicchieri","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.5","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public policies often involve “norm nudging”, the use of norm information to steer individual behavior in a prosocial direction. Analysis of social norm messaging often concentrates on the outcome measure: the potential change in behavior. The cognitive and psychological processes that underlie individuals’ response to norm information, especially the inferences they draw, are usually overlooked. This knowledge gap may lead to adverse consequences, such as messages backfiring. To (factually) justify norm nudging interventions, it is essential that policymakers understand the complex mechanisms that link context, social expectations and preferences, and how the interpretation of different types of messages affects behavior.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46218684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Reflections on applying behavioural insights to crime: a guide for behavioural scientists and criminologists in search of policy unicorns 关于将行为见解应用于犯罪的思考:行为科学家和犯罪学家寻找政策独角兽的指南
IF 5.1 Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.13
Matthew Davies, S. Ruda
Behavioural science has made significant contributions to public policy over the last decade from tax compliance to pensions and energy use. However, behavioural insights (BI) have not yet been able to claim significant policy shifts in the area of crime, despite increasing interest and experimentation. This paper offers a critical reflection on the state of BI and crime from the perspective of those who have been at the forefront of this work since the inception of the world's first behavioural science team in government. We outline how existing theories of crime have already laid foundations for the successful application of BI but identify opportunities to build on these with tools from behavioural science. We conclude by examining how continued cross-pollination of ideas between BI and disciplines such as applied criminology points to promising directions for future research.
在过去的十年里,行为科学对公共政策做出了重大贡献,从税收合规到养老金和能源使用。然而,尽管人们越来越感兴趣并进行了实验,但行为洞察(BI)尚未能够声称犯罪领域的政策发生了重大变化。本文从世界上第一个政府行为科学团队成立以来一直站在这项工作最前沿的人的角度,对BI和犯罪的现状进行了批判性反思。我们概述了现有的犯罪理论如何为BI的成功应用奠定了基础,但也发现了利用行为科学工具在这些基础上发展的机会。最后,我们研究了BI和应用犯罪学等学科之间思想的持续交叉如何为未来的研究指明了有希望的方向。
{"title":"Reflections on applying behavioural insights to crime: a guide for behavioural scientists and criminologists in search of policy unicorns","authors":"Matthew Davies, S. Ruda","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.13","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Behavioural science has made significant contributions to public policy over the last decade from tax compliance to pensions and energy use. However, behavioural insights (BI) have not yet been able to claim significant policy shifts in the area of crime, despite increasing interest and experimentation. This paper offers a critical reflection on the state of BI and crime from the perspective of those who have been at the forefront of this work since the inception of the world's first behavioural science team in government. We outline how existing theories of crime have already laid foundations for the successful application of BI but identify opportunities to build on these with tools from behavioural science. We conclude by examining how continued cross-pollination of ideas between BI and disciplines such as applied criminology points to promising directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49488595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Behavioural Public Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1