Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V7I3.1033
Siti Chotijah, D. Muryati, Tri Mukyani
Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Kota Semarang merupakan salah satu institusi pelayanan kesehatan profesional. Aktifitas medis yang ada di Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung tentunya akan menghasilkan limbah, sehingga peneliti tertarik untuk mengkaji tentang sejauh mana Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung mengimplementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah Rumah Sakit serta mengetahui kendala yang dihadapi dan cara mengatasinya. Peneliti menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis sosiologis dengan spesifikasi yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif analitis, seperti mendeskripsikan mengenai implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah di Rumah Sakit Sultan Agung berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1204/MENKES/SK/X/2004 tentang Persyaratan kesehatan lingkungan Rumah Sakit. Penelitian ini menggunakan cara pengambilan sampel sistematis Non Random yang dilakukan dengan cara teknik Purposive Sampling yang dilakukan dengan cara menentukan kriteria sampel terlebih dahulu. Data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer, yang diperoleh melalui wawancara terhadap pihak terkait secara langsung serta didukung oleh data sekunder yang berupa studi keperpustakaan. Dari hasil penelitian, implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah rumah sakit di Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Kota Semarang sudah berjalan dengan baik sesuai dengan Nomor 1204/MENKES/SK/X/2004 tentang Persyaratan Kesehatan Lingkungan Rumah Sakit. Adapun kendala yang ada mengenai standar baku mutu amonia akan tetapi kendala tersebut telah ditepuh upaya mengatasi kendala oleh Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung berupa mengadakan pertemuan forum sanitasi sekota semarang dan mendapatkan hasil berupa kebijakan baru yaitu Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.68/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/8/2016 tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Domestik.Sultan Agung Hospital Semarang is one of the institutions of professional health services. Medical activity at Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital will surely produce waste, so the researcher is interested to study about the extent to which Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital implements the hospital waste management policy and knows the constraints faced and how to overcome them. The researcher uses a kind of sociological juridical research with the specification that is used that is analytical descriptive, such as describing the implementation of waste management policy at Sultan Agung Hospital based on the Decree of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1204 / MENKES / SK / X / 2004 on Hospital health requirements. This research uses non-random systematic sampling method done by Purposive Sampling technique which is done by determining the criteria of sample first. The data used in this study is primary data, obtained through interviews of stakeholders directly and supported by secondary data in the form of study keperpustakaan. From the research result, the implementation of hospital waste manag
伊斯兰苏丹大三宝垄医院是医疗专业机构之一。在伊斯兰大苏丹医院的医疗活动当然会产生废物，因此研究人员有兴趣调查伊斯兰大苏丹医院在多大程度上实施了医院废物管理政策，了解其面临的障碍和应对措施。研究人员使用分析性描述性社会学家的研究术语，如根据印度尼西亚共和国卫生部长第1204号/MENKES/SK/X/2004号关于医院环境健康要求的决定，描述了苏丹大医院采用的分析性描述性描述的污水管理政策的实施。本研究采用的是一种非随机的系统抽样方法，这种方法是通过确定样本标准来进行的。本研究的主要数据是通过直接对有关各方的采访获得的原始数据，并由凯库研究的次要数据支持。根据这项研究，伊斯兰大苏丹三宝垄医院的医院废弃物管理政策的实施，一直在按照第1204号/MENKES/SK/X/2004号对医院环境健康要求的实施。至于氨有关于质量标准的障碍然而所ditepuh努力克服这些障碍,医院卫生论坛开会的伟大的伊斯兰苏丹的三宝垄和新政策的结果,即规定印度尼西亚共和国环境和林业部长P . 68 - Menlhk Setjen / Kum号码。2016 /8是关于家庭废水质量的。苏丹大医院三宝垄是专业卫生服务机构之一。伊斯兰大苏丹医院的医疗活动肯定会浪费掉，所以这项研究对伊斯兰大苏丹医院实施的限制政策很感兴趣，知道这些限制的脸和如何过度生产。The researcher利用a有点sociological法律研究with The specification就是以前就是分析descriptive,美国如此describing The implementation of废弃物policy at苏丹大医院命令》改编自《印度尼西亚共和国部长institutes of Health) 1204号MENKES / 2004 / X / SK在医院健康requirements。这项研究的uses非随机sys主题方法方法由Purposive样本技术完成，该技术是由第一样本critesler完成的。《小学以前在这研究数据,获得通过的interviews stakeholders直接and supported by这数据in The form of study图书馆。从研究结果来看，三宝垄大苏丹大医院浪费管理政策的实施一直运行得很好，与第1204号/ MENKES / SK / X / 2004年《医疗环境条件报》一起运行。obstacles的质量标准》存在关于氨但是这些obstacles有被plagued efforts to overcome obstacles会议由苏丹伊斯兰大医院in The form of境城sanitation三宝垄和论坛得到results formof a new policy of的环境部长and Forestry)《印度尼西亚共和国Regulation) P . 68 - Menlhk Setjen / Kum当家。1/8/2016在《家庭浪费水质量的标准。
{"title":"Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Limbah Rumah Sakit Di Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Kota Semarang","authors":"Siti Chotijah, D. Muryati, Tri Mukyani","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V7I3.1033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V7I3.1033","url":null,"abstract":" Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Kota Semarang merupakan salah satu institusi pelayanan kesehatan profesional. Aktifitas medis yang ada di Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung tentunya akan menghasilkan limbah, sehingga peneliti tertarik untuk mengkaji tentang sejauh mana Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung mengimplementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah Rumah Sakit serta mengetahui kendala yang dihadapi dan cara mengatasinya. Peneliti menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis sosiologis dengan spesifikasi yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif analitis, seperti mendeskripsikan mengenai implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah di Rumah Sakit Sultan Agung berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1204/MENKES/SK/X/2004 tentang Persyaratan kesehatan lingkungan Rumah Sakit. Penelitian ini menggunakan cara pengambilan sampel sistematis Non Random yang dilakukan dengan cara teknik Purposive Sampling yang dilakukan dengan cara menentukan kriteria sampel terlebih dahulu. Data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer, yang diperoleh melalui wawancara terhadap pihak terkait secara langsung serta didukung oleh data sekunder yang berupa studi keperpustakaan. Dari hasil penelitian, implementasi kebijakan pengelolaan limbah rumah sakit di Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Kota Semarang sudah berjalan dengan baik sesuai dengan Nomor 1204/MENKES/SK/X/2004 tentang Persyaratan Kesehatan Lingkungan Rumah Sakit. Adapun kendala yang ada mengenai standar baku mutu amonia akan tetapi kendala tersebut telah ditepuh upaya mengatasi kendala oleh Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung berupa mengadakan pertemuan forum sanitasi sekota semarang dan mendapatkan hasil berupa kebijakan baru yaitu Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.68/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/8/2016 tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Domestik.Sultan Agung Hospital Semarang is one of the institutions of professional health services. Medical activity at Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital will surely produce waste, so the researcher is interested to study about the extent to which Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital implements the hospital waste management policy and knows the constraints faced and how to overcome them. The researcher uses a kind of sociological juridical research with the specification that is used that is analytical descriptive, such as describing the implementation of waste management policy at Sultan Agung Hospital based on the Decree of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1204 / MENKES / SK / X / 2004 on Hospital health requirements. This research uses non-random systematic sampling method done by Purposive Sampling technique which is done by determining the criteria of sample first. The data used in this study is primary data, obtained through interviews of stakeholders directly and supported by secondary data in the form of study keperpustakaan. From the research result, the implementation of hospital waste manag","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79432779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1446
Fransiska Novita Eleanora, A. Sari
Recognition and protection of children's rights is fully a shared responsibility of both the parents, the government and the wider community that guarantees its survival and development and the growth of children in a strong, healthy and intelligent state. The main role in the development of children in addition to nutrition and vitamin intake or fulfillment of clothing, food and shelter, is also needed attention to the development of children in the future which is the right of the child to get education and teaching so that the aspirations can be achieved and succeed as he wants. But with the changing times it turns out that the rights of children are neglected in the sense that they are not fulfilled as expected, because they are triggered by economic factors so that children cannot attend school or continue their education due to marriage at a young age or so-called early marriage. With the occurrence of marriage at a young age for children is a violation of the rights of children, and children experience the destruction of their future because they are not ready and mature thinking and psychology because basically children should be protected from any threat or anyone. Protection of children's rights is absolutely granted, and has been regulated in the child protection law and marriage law regarding the age limit of children, the fact that there is still a high level of child marriage. The research method that is used or used in this writing uses literature studies based on the literature of journals, books, magazines and even from legislation relating to child protection and child marriage. The results showed that economic factors are the dominant occurrence of early marriage and lack of awareness of parents and community members on the protection and prevention of child marriages, on the other hand there is the assumption that by marrying their children, the obligations of parents are completed and by carrying out the marriage live independently without depending on their parents. The involvement and participation of the government can also prevent early marriage, especially in the application of sanctions in the rules that have been set, because if you want to protect children's rights, one of them is to prevent early marriage, or in other words stop child marriage.
{"title":"Child Protection And Marriage Prevention","authors":"Fransiska Novita Eleanora, A. Sari","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1446","url":null,"abstract":"Recognition and protection of children's rights is fully a shared responsibility of both the parents, the government and the wider community that guarantees its survival and development and the growth of children in a strong, healthy and intelligent state. The main role in the development of children in addition to nutrition and vitamin intake or fulfillment of clothing, food and shelter, is also needed attention to the development of children in the future which is the right of the child to get education and teaching so that the aspirations can be achieved and succeed as he wants. But with the changing times it turns out that the rights of children are neglected in the sense that they are not fulfilled as expected, because they are triggered by economic factors so that children cannot attend school or continue their education due to marriage at a young age or so-called early marriage. With the occurrence of marriage at a young age for children is a violation of the rights of children, and children experience the destruction of their future because they are not ready and mature thinking and psychology because basically children should be protected from any threat or anyone. Protection of children's rights is absolutely granted, and has been regulated in the child protection law and marriage law regarding the age limit of children, the fact that there is still a high level of child marriage. The research method that is used or used in this writing uses literature studies based on the literature of journals, books, magazines and even from legislation relating to child protection and child marriage. The results showed that economic factors are the dominant occurrence of early marriage and lack of awareness of parents and community members on the protection and prevention of child marriages, on the other hand there is the assumption that by marrying their children, the obligations of parents are completed and by carrying out the marriage live independently without depending on their parents. The involvement and participation of the government can also prevent early marriage, especially in the application of sanctions in the rules that have been set, because if you want to protect children's rights, one of them is to prevent early marriage, or in other words stop child marriage.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72667731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1445
Ani Triwati
Negara mengakomodir hak setiap orang termasuk hak perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum mempunyai hak untuk memperoleh akses keadilan. Sebagai negara yang telah meratifikasi Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Indonesia berpedoman pada Konvensi tersebut dalam mewujudkan persamaan semua orang di hadapan hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan, larangan diskriminasi serta menjamin perlindungan yang setara dari diskriminasi, termasuk jenis kelamin atau gender. Selanjutnya, Indonesia sebagai pihak dalam Konvensi Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Perempuan (Convention on the Elimination All of Forms Discrimination Against Women/ CEDAW) mengakui kewajiban negara untuk memastikan bahwa perempuan mempunyai akses keadilan dan bebas dari diskriminasi dalam sistem peradilan (pidana). Dalam upaya memberikan akses keadilan, negara menjabarkan jaminan hak perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Sistem peradilan pidana merupakan salah satu upaya dalam memberikan akses keadilan sebagai perlindungan bagi perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum melalui perlindungan terhadap hak-hak perempuan selama pemeriksaan dalam setiap tahap peradilan.
The rights of every person including rights of women encounter the law are accommodated by the state based onthe Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945. Women’s in law having the right in terms of accessing justice. As a nation that ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with Law Number 12 of 2005 regarding the legitimation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Indonesia refers to the convention in realizing the equality of all people before laws and regulations, prohibition of discrimination and guarantee the equal protection from any form of discrimination, including gender. Furthermore, Indonesia as a part in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) admit the obligation of the state to ensure that women are capable accessing justice and exempt from discrimination in the criminal justice system. In an effort to provide access to justice, the state elucidates the guarantee of the rights of women’s in the laws within the law regulations. Therefore, The criminal justice system is the one o
1945年，印度尼西亚共和国宪法规定，人民享有一切权利，包括妇女权利。与法律有冲突的妇女有权获得正义。作为国际契约的国家已经批准了关于公民和政治权利的12号法案批准2005年关于国际盟约在印尼的民权和政治权利,只有在方程中实现所有人在法律面前公约规定的立法,禁止歧视和保证的平等保护,包括性别或性别歧视。此外，印度尼西亚作为废除《消除所有形式歧视妇女公约》的各方承认，国家有义务确保妇女在司法系统中享有公正和不受歧视。为了促进正义，国家提出了在法律法规中遵守法律的妇女权利的保证。刑事司法系统是通过在司法每个阶段的审查过程中保护妇女免受法律制裁的努力之一。包括妇女权益权益在内的每一项人权都是由1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法规定的。妇女在法律上使用了正确的接受正义条款。美国a nation)那ratify《国际盟约在民权和政治权利和法律的12号legitimation》2005年关于国际盟约的民权和政治权利上,印度尼西亚在realizing refers to the会议之前所有人的平等权利》and regulations, prohibition of歧视和保证《平等保护的任何形式的歧视,包括性别在内。此外，印尼还提供了对所有被判对妇女进行绝育的协议的一部分，以确保妇女能够接受司法系统中的正义和免于审判。在为司法提供提供途径的情况下，该州特别列出了法律规定的妇女权利的担保人。例如，在对司法系统的调查中，通过对妇女权利的保护，罪犯司法系统是法律途径之一。
{"title":"Akses Keadilan Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana","authors":"Ani Triwati","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1445","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Negara mengakomodir hak setiap orang termasuk hak perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum mempunyai hak untuk memperoleh akses keadilan. Sebagai negara yang telah meratifikasi Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan <em>International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</em>, Indonesia berpedoman pada Konvensi tersebut dalam mewujudkan persamaan semua orang di hadapan hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan, larangan diskriminasi serta menjamin perlindungan yang setara dari diskriminasi, termasuk jenis kelamin atau gender. Selanjutnya, Indonesia sebagai pihak dalam Konvensi Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Perempuan (<em>Convention on the Elimination All of Forms Discrimination Against Women</em>/ CEDAW) mengakui kewajiban negara untuk memastikan bahwa perempuan mempunyai akses keadilan dan bebas dari diskriminasi dalam sistem peradilan (pidana). Dalam upaya memberikan akses keadilan, negara menjabarkan jaminan hak perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Sistem peradilan pidana merupakan salah satu upaya dalam memberikan akses keadilan sebagai perlindungan bagi perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum melalui perlindungan terhadap hak-hak perempuan selama pemeriksaan dalam setiap tahap peradilan.</p><p><em> </em><em>T</em><em>he rights of ever</em><em>y person</em><em> including rights of women </em><em>encounter</em><em> the law </em><em>are accommodated by the state based on</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia</em><em> of 1945</em><em>. </em><em>Women’s in law</em><em> having the right </em><em>in terms of accessing justice</em><em>. As a </em><em>nation</em><em> that ratif</em><em>y</em><em> the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with Law Number 12 of 2005 </em><em>regarding</em><em> the </em><em>legitimation</em><em> of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Indonesia refers to the</em><em> c</em><em>onvention in realizing the equality of all people before laws and regulations, prohibition of discrimination and guarantee </em><em>the </em><em>equal protection from </em><em>any form of </em><em>discrimination, including gender. Furthermore, Indonesia as a part</em><em> in</em><em> the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) </em><em>admit</em><em> the obligation of the state to ensure that women </em><em>are capable </em><em> access</em><em>ing</em><em> justice and </em><em>exempt</em><em> from discrimination in the criminal justice system. In an effort to provide access to justice, the state </em><em>elucidates</em><em> the guarantee of </em><em>the rights of women’s</em><em> in the laws </em><em>within the law</em><em> regulations. </em><em>Therefore, </em><em>The criminal justice system is </em><em>the one o","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79434052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1444
Xavier Nugraha, Maulia Madina, Ulfa Septian Dika
Artikel ini merupakan kajian konseptual terkait usulan DPR sebagai langkah awal dalam pembentukan Pengadilan HAM Ad Hoc. Dalam penjelasan Pasal 43 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia, dijelaskan bahwa usulan DPR tersebut didasarkan pada dugaan telah terjadinya pelanggaran HAM berat yang locus dan tempus delictinya terjadi sebelum diundangkannya Undang-Undang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia. Frasa dugaan dalam penjelasan tersebut menimbulkan problematika karena melakukan dugaan tersebut adalah fungsi penyelidikan sesuai Pasal 1 angka 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000. DPR seolah menjalankan fungsi untuk melakukan penyelidikan dalam yang seharusnya merupakan kewenangan Komnas HAM sesuai Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000. Hal ini tumpang tindih kewenangan DPR dan Komnas HAM. Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU/V/2007, DPR wajib untuk mengajukan usulan pengadilan HAM Ad Hoc , setalah adanya dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat sebelum diundangkannya Undang-Undang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia oleh Komnas HAM This article is a conceptual study related to the House of Representatives proposal as an initial step in the establishment of the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court. In the explanation of Article 43 paragraph (2) of Law Number 26 Year 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court, it was explained that the House of Representatives proposal was based on the alleged occurrence of gross human rights violations that had locus and temporal delays before the promulgation of the Human Rights Court Law. The alleged phrase in the explanation raises a problem because making such an assumption is a function of investigation in accordance with Article 1 number 5 of Act Number 26 of 2000. The House of Representatives seems to carry out a function to conduct investigations which should be the authority of the National Human Rights Commission in accordance with Article 18 of Law Number 26 Year 2000. This authoriy overlaps the authority of the DPR and the National Human Rights Commission. After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU / V / 2007, the House of Representatives was obliged to submit an Ad Hoc Human Rights court proposal, following the alleged gross human rights violations before the promulgation of the Human Rights Court Law by the National Commission of Human Rights
这篇文章是对众议院拟议的概念审查，认为这是建立人权法的第一步。在《2000年人权法》第43条(2)中，有人解释说，众议院的提议是基于在《人权法》通过之前发生的严重侵犯人权行为的指控。根据2000年第1条第5条第26条的调查结果，这个所谓的短语引起了问题。根据《2000年26号法案》第18条，国会似乎在进行调查。这是议会权力和联邦责任的重叠。MK 18号判决后强制PUU / V / 2007,众议院提出人权法庭临时提案之前,存在涉嫌严重侵犯人权的罪行之后diundangkannya人权法庭法律是由含的警署这文章a conceptual研究相关《House of Representatives体制》美国提案的最初一步在临时人权法庭。《解释》文章43号法律的第(2)段26年2000 concerning人权法院网、是、讲解的《House of Representatives提案是改编自名知情occurrence of格罗斯Human Rights violations那有轨迹和颞delays promulgation》之前,人权法庭的法律。《意外经历》的反响引发了一个问题，因为对《2000年第26卷第1卷第5卷的调查起到了作用。众议院的代表似乎起到了作用，以掩盖调查的作用，这应该是国家人权委员会对2000年第18年的法律事务的授权。这超越了众议院和全国人权委员会的授权。《移交法庭决定之后的18 PUU / V / 2007号,《House of Representatives)是obliged to submit临时人权法庭的建议,跟踪《名知情格罗斯Human Rights violations promulgation》之前,人权法庭法律:《National Commission of Human Rights)
{"title":"Akibat Hukum Berlakunya Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU/V/2007 Terhadap Usulan DPR Dalam Pembentukan Pengadilan Ham Ad Hoc","authors":"Xavier Nugraha, Maulia Madina, Ulfa Septian Dika","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1444","url":null,"abstract":"Artikel ini merupakan kajian konseptual terkait usulan DPR sebagai langkah awal dalam pembentukan Pengadilan HAM Ad Hoc. Dalam penjelasan Pasal 43 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia, dijelaskan bahwa usulan DPR tersebut didasarkan pada dugaan telah terjadinya pelanggaran HAM berat yang locus dan tempus delictinya terjadi sebelum diundangkannya Undang-Undang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia. Frasa dugaan dalam penjelasan tersebut menimbulkan problematika karena melakukan dugaan tersebut adalah fungsi penyelidikan sesuai Pasal 1 angka 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000. DPR seolah menjalankan fungsi untuk melakukan penyelidikan dalam yang seharusnya merupakan kewenangan Komnas HAM sesuai Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000. Hal ini tumpang tindih kewenangan DPR dan Komnas HAM. Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU/V/2007, DPR wajib untuk mengajukan usulan pengadilan HAM Ad Hoc , setalah adanya dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat sebelum diundangkannya Undang-Undang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia oleh Komnas HAM This article is a conceptual study related to the House of Representatives proposal as an initial step in the establishment of the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court. In the explanation of Article 43 paragraph (2) of Law Number 26 Year 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court, it was explained that the House of Representatives proposal was based on the alleged occurrence of gross human rights violations that had locus and temporal delays before the promulgation of the Human Rights Court Law. The alleged phrase in the explanation raises a problem because making such an assumption is a function of investigation in accordance with Article 1 number 5 of Act Number 26 of 2000. The House of Representatives seems to carry out a function to conduct investigations which should be the authority of the National Human Rights Commission in accordance with Article 18 of Law Number 26 Year 2000. This authoriy overlaps the authority of the DPR and the National Human Rights Commission. After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU / V / 2007, the House of Representatives was obliged to submit an Ad Hoc Human Rights court proposal, following the alleged gross human rights violations before the promulgation of the Human Rights Court Law by the National Commission of Human Rights","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87521784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1443
Yaris Adhial Fajrin, Ach. Faisol Triwiwijaya
Korupsi sebagai extra ordinary crime dalam upaya memberantasnya tidak cukup hanya mengandalkan penegakan hukum pidana yang sifatnya represif namun juga harus menggunakan instrument pencegahan. Namun pasca putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 aspek pencegahan dalam rangka tindak pidana korupsi mengalami kemunduran dalam tataran regulasi karena putusan tersebut menyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat pasal 7 ayat (2) huruf g Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 yang merupakan salah satu regulasi yag bersifat pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi. Aspek pencegahan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi memiliki peran strategis karena tidak cukup apabila hanya menggunakan penegakan yang sifatnya represif. Dipandang dari sisi keadilan Pancasila serta politik kriminal putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 merupakan anomali ditengah gencarnya agitasi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia dan menyebabkan kerugian bagi masyarakat karena dalam tindak pidana korupsi masyarakat adalah korban.Corruption as an extraordinary crime in an attempt to eradicate it is not enough just to rely on criminal law enforcement that are repressive but also must use the instrument of prevention. But after the Constitutional Court decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 aspects of prevention in the context of corruption suffered a setback in the level of regulation because the decision states do not have binding legal force of Article 7 paragraph (2) letter g of Law No. 10 of 2016 which is one regulation meant to be the prevention of corruption. Prevention aspects of the eradication of corruption has a strategic role because it is not enough if it only uses that are repressive enforcement. Viewed from the side of Pancasila justice and criminal politics, the Constitutional Court's decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 was an anomaly in the midst of the incessant agitation to eradicate corruption in Indonesia and caused losses to the community because in the corruption act the community was a victim.
腐败作为一种额外的普通犯罪，仅仅依靠压制性的刑法执行，还必须使用预防措施。然而MK 71 - PUU - XIV号判决后2016年在预防腐败重罪框架开始衰落方面监管领域,因为这些裁定没有法律约束力的力量章7节(2)字母g 10号2016年的法律的规定之一是预防腐败重罪。根除腐败的预防方面具有战略作用，因为仅仅使用压制性的执行是不够的。从潘卡西拉正义和犯罪政治裁决来看，在印尼持续不断的根除腐败和造成社会损失方面，这是一个异常，因为在刑事腐败行为中，公共腐败是受害者。腐败是一种既能根除的犯罪行为，但还必须使用预防工具，而仅仅依靠犯罪法律的惩罚是不够的。但《死后移交法庭决定2016年71 - PUU - XIV号aspects of《预防》背景of corruption痛苦a级setback》regulation),因为《决定各州不要有印象深刻的合法的文章《7第(2)段之力g的2016年的10号法律,这是一号regulation)命中注定的不朽之预防corruption。腐败的根除带来了策略的好处，因为仅仅用被压制的手段来推进是不够的。Viewed从《side of (Pancasila justice and犯罪政治和宪法法院的决定,第71 - PUU XIV / midst》2016年是一个反常现象在incessant agitation到eradicate corruption in印尼和年轻损失社会化社区,因为在《社区corruption法案》是个受害者。
{"title":"Pencegahan Korupsi Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 Melalui Pendekatan Kebijakan","authors":"Yaris Adhial Fajrin, Ach. Faisol Triwiwijaya","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1443","url":null,"abstract":"Korupsi sebagai extra ordinary crime dalam upaya memberantasnya tidak cukup hanya mengandalkan penegakan hukum pidana yang sifatnya represif namun juga harus menggunakan instrument pencegahan. Namun pasca putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 aspek pencegahan dalam rangka tindak pidana korupsi mengalami kemunduran dalam tataran regulasi karena putusan tersebut menyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat pasal 7 ayat (2) huruf g Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 yang merupakan salah satu regulasi yag bersifat pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi. Aspek pencegahan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi memiliki peran strategis karena tidak cukup apabila hanya menggunakan penegakan yang sifatnya represif. Dipandang dari sisi keadilan Pancasila serta politik kriminal putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 merupakan anomali ditengah gencarnya agitasi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia dan menyebabkan kerugian bagi masyarakat karena dalam tindak pidana korupsi masyarakat adalah korban.Corruption as an extraordinary crime in an attempt to eradicate it is not enough just to rely on criminal law enforcement that are repressive but also must use the instrument of prevention. But after the Constitutional Court decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 aspects of prevention in the context of corruption suffered a setback in the level of regulation because the decision states do not have binding legal force of Article 7 paragraph (2) letter g of Law No. 10 of 2016 which is one regulation meant to be the prevention of corruption. Prevention aspects of the eradication of corruption has a strategic role because it is not enough if it only uses that are repressive enforcement. Viewed from the side of Pancasila justice and criminal politics, the Constitutional Court's decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 was an anomaly in the midst of the incessant agitation to eradicate corruption in Indonesia and caused losses to the community because in the corruption act the community was a victim.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90225755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-22DOI: 10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1442
Endro Tri Susdarwono
Penelitian ini membahas tentang politik hukum ekonomi pertahanan di Indonesia tahun 2002-2018 untuk kajian industri pertahanan. Kajian studi ekonomi pertahanan dikaji tidak hanya dari wacana ekonomi tetapi dari wacana hukum dan politik. Industri pertahanan merupakan salah satu komponen vital dari kemampuan pertahanan. Industri pertahanan yang kuat mempunyai dua efek utama, yakni efek langsung terhadap pembangunan kemampuan pertahanan, dan efek terhadap pembangunan ekonomi dan teknologi nasional. Rencana induk pengembangan industry pertahanan merupakan penjabaran dari undang-Undang Industri Pertahanan yang menekankan adanya pemberian insentif untuk mendorong perkembangan industry pertahanan di Indonesia.This study discusses the legal politic of defense economics in Indonesia in 2002-2018 for the defense industry study. The study of defense economic studies is examined not only from economic discourse but from legal and political discourse. The defense industry is one of the vital components of defense capability. A strong defense industry has two main effects, namely the direct effect on the development of defense capabilities, and the effect on national economic and technological development. The master plan for developing the defense industry is an elaboration of the Defense Industry Law which emphasizes the provision of incentives to encourage the development of the defense industry in Indonesia.
{"title":"Politik Hukum Ekonomi Pertahanan di Indonesia Tahun 2002-2018 : Kajian Industri Pertahanan","authors":"Endro Tri Susdarwono","doi":"10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V9I1.1442","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini membahas tentang politik hukum ekonomi pertahanan di Indonesia tahun 2002-2018 untuk kajian industri pertahanan. Kajian studi ekonomi pertahanan dikaji tidak hanya dari wacana ekonomi tetapi dari wacana hukum dan politik. Industri pertahanan merupakan salah satu komponen vital dari kemampuan pertahanan. Industri pertahanan yang kuat mempunyai dua efek utama, yakni efek langsung terhadap pembangunan kemampuan pertahanan, dan efek terhadap pembangunan ekonomi dan teknologi nasional. Rencana induk pengembangan industry pertahanan merupakan penjabaran dari undang-Undang Industri Pertahanan yang menekankan adanya pemberian insentif untuk mendorong perkembangan industry pertahanan di Indonesia.This study discusses the legal politic of defense economics in Indonesia in 2002-2018 for the defense industry study. The study of defense economic studies is examined not only from economic discourse but from legal and political discourse. The defense industry is one of the vital components of defense capability. A strong defense industry has two main effects, namely the direct effect on the development of defense capabilities, and the effect on national economic and technological development. The master plan for developing the defense industry is an elaboration of the Defense Industry Law which emphasizes the provision of incentives to encourage the development of the defense industry in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89582845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan proses pemanfaatan sumber daya air berbasis masyarakat dan hasilnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Validitas data menggunakan triangulasi sumber dan triangulasi metode. Proses penelitian dimulai dengan pengumpulan data, reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa proses pemanfaatan sumber daya air berbasis masyarakat di Kampung Badran Yogyakarta menurut peneliti melalui lima tahap, yakni tahap dream, discovery, design, define, dan destiny. Hasil pemanfaatan tersebut adalah adanya pemenuhan kebutuhan air bersih yang memadai dengan memanfaatkan sumber daya air, adanya perubahan perilaku masyarakat yang lebih bersih, tumbuhnya kesadaran masyarakat untuk lebih menjaga kelestarian alam, meningkatnya ekonomi masyarakat, konservasi sumber daya air, sebagai indikator kelestarian lingkungan, sebagai pemenuhan kebutuhan rumah tangga, dan yang terakhir yaitu partisipasi masyarakat dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya air. Kata kunci : Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Air, Berbasis Masyarakat, Bantaran Sungai AbstractThe purpose of this research is to explain the process of using community-based water resources and their results. This research uses descriptive qualitative research type. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. Data validity uses source triangulation and method triangulation. The research process begins with data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the process of utilizing community-based water resources in Kampung Badran Yogyakarta according to researchers through five stages, namely the stages of dream, discovery, design, define, and destiny. The results of the utilization are the fulfillment of adequate clean water needs by utilizing water resources, a change in the behavior of people who are cleaner, growing public awareness to better preserve nature, improving the community's economy, conserving water resources, as an indicator of environmental sustainability, as fulfillment household needs, and finally community participation in the utilization of water resources. Keywords: Utilization of Water Resources, Community-Based, Riverbank
本研究旨在解释社区水资源利用过程及其结果。本研究采用了一种描述性质的研究。利用观察、采访和记录来收集数据的技术。使用源三角法和方法验证数据的有效性。研究过程从数据收集、数据还原、数据展示和推论开始。这项研究表明，日经镇以水为基础的水资源利用过程根据研究人员的研究，经过五个阶段的梦想、探索、设计、定义和命运。利用这些结果是满足饮用水需求的存在充分的利用水资源,行为更干净,生长的社会认知变化更维护社会自然经济,增加社会动物,水资源的保护,作为保存环境指标,满足家庭需求,最后一个就是社会参与利用水资源。关键词:利用以社区为基础的水资源资源，这一研究的目的是探索利用公共资源和其资源的过程。这个研究uses描述了质量研究类型。数据收集技术使用观察、面试和文档。数据验证uses源代码和方法三角。研究过程产生的数据收集、数据减减、数据提交和drawing结论。这项研究的结果是日德兰市用水供应的公理结果，其结果涉及五个不同阶段的梦、发现、设计、定义和命运。utilization results》是《adequate fulfillment干净的水需要由utilizing水上资源,社会行为》(a change in people who are吸尘器,情绪就公共意识到更好的保存自然,improving社区的经济,conserving水上资源环境可持续发展之美国的指示器,美国fulfillment一名士兵需要全书》,终于在utilization of水上资源社区参与。Keywords:水资源，社区基础，河岸的公用事业
{"title":"PEMANFAATAN SUMBER DAYA AIR OLEH MASYARAKAT BANTARAN SUNGAI BENING WINONGO (B2W) YOGYAKARTA","authors":"Wahidatul Rizqi firianti","doi":"10.24014/jmm.v4i1.7721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jmm.v4i1.7721","url":null,"abstract":"AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan proses pemanfaatan sumber daya air berbasis masyarakat dan hasilnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Validitas data menggunakan triangulasi sumber dan triangulasi metode. Proses penelitian dimulai dengan pengumpulan data, reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa proses pemanfaatan sumber daya air berbasis masyarakat di Kampung Badran Yogyakarta menurut peneliti melalui lima tahap, yakni tahap dream, discovery, design, define, dan destiny. Hasil pemanfaatan tersebut adalah adanya pemenuhan kebutuhan air bersih yang memadai dengan memanfaatkan sumber daya air, adanya perubahan perilaku masyarakat yang lebih bersih, tumbuhnya kesadaran masyarakat untuk lebih menjaga kelestarian alam, meningkatnya ekonomi masyarakat, konservasi sumber daya air, sebagai indikator kelestarian lingkungan, sebagai pemenuhan kebutuhan rumah tangga, dan yang terakhir yaitu partisipasi masyarakat dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya air. Kata kunci : Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Air, Berbasis Masyarakat, Bantaran Sungai AbstractThe purpose of this research is to explain the process of using community-based water resources and their results. This research uses descriptive qualitative research type. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. Data validity uses source triangulation and method triangulation. The research process begins with data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the process of utilizing community-based water resources in Kampung Badran Yogyakarta according to researchers through five stages, namely the stages of dream, discovery, design, define, and destiny. The results of the utilization are the fulfillment of adequate clean water needs by utilizing water resources, a change in the behavior of people who are cleaner, growing public awareness to better preserve nature, improving the community's economy, conserving water resources, as an indicator of environmental sustainability, as fulfillment household needs, and finally community participation in the utilization of water resources. Keywords: Utilization of Water Resources, Community-Based, Riverbank","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84074732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kerusakan lingkungan dan bencana alam dalam dua tahun terakhir sangat menjadi perhatian serius saat ini. Dampak kerugian dari berbagai aspek telah di rasakan dan memberikan efek pada kehidupan sosial masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu dalam kaitannya isu lingkungan saat ini menjadi tugas bersama pada upaya pelestariannya. Kerusakan yang terjadi tidak mungkin untuk bisa menjadi seperti sediakalah akan tetapi upaya strategi pembangunan dan penataan wilayah yang konservatif dapat menjadi isu strategis di dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat di wilayah rawan bencana. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini adalah mendeskripsikan sejarah gerakan sosial konservasi hutan rakyat berbasis masyarakat lokal di suatu wilayah dan menganalisis sebuah strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam gerakan konservasi dengan studi kasus pada wilayah Semoyo. Pengumpulann data oleh peneliti di peroleh dari analisis studi karya ilmiah sebelumnya yang kemudian lebih di fokuskan pada penyampaian strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data dengan teknik triangulasi. Hasil penelitian strategi gerakan yang dilakukan oleh para aktor gerakan sosial adalah strategi advokasi dengan mendirikan lembaga bank hutan rakyat semoyo (Forest Bank Indonesia) dan membentuk peraturan desa mengenai hutan rakyat dalam meminimalisir adanya tebang butuh serta strategi pemberdayaan sebagai langkah untuk memandirikan masyarakat semoyo dalam menumbuhkan ekonomi dengan tetap melindungi alam semoyo sebagai kawasan konservasi. Kata kunci: Gerakan sosial, hutan rakyat, Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, dan strategi gerakan.
{"title":"STRATEGI PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DALAM KAWASAN RAWAN BENCANA (Analisis Dalam Studi Gerakan Sosial Konservasi Hutan Rakyat Di Semoyo Gunung Kidul)","authors":"Ikhwana Khoiroh","doi":"10.24014/jmm.v4i1.7733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jmm.v4i1.7733","url":null,"abstract":"Kerusakan lingkungan dan bencana alam dalam dua tahun terakhir sangat menjadi perhatian serius saat ini. Dampak kerugian dari berbagai aspek telah di rasakan dan memberikan efek pada kehidupan sosial masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu dalam kaitannya isu lingkungan saat ini menjadi tugas bersama pada upaya pelestariannya. Kerusakan yang terjadi tidak mungkin untuk bisa menjadi seperti sediakalah akan tetapi upaya strategi pembangunan dan penataan wilayah yang konservatif dapat menjadi isu strategis di dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat di wilayah rawan bencana. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini adalah mendeskripsikan sejarah gerakan sosial konservasi hutan rakyat berbasis masyarakat lokal di suatu wilayah dan menganalisis sebuah strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam gerakan konservasi dengan studi kasus pada wilayah Semoyo. Pengumpulann data oleh peneliti di peroleh dari analisis studi karya ilmiah sebelumnya yang kemudian lebih di fokuskan pada penyampaian strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data dengan teknik triangulasi. Hasil penelitian strategi gerakan yang dilakukan oleh para aktor gerakan sosial adalah strategi advokasi dengan mendirikan lembaga bank hutan rakyat semoyo (Forest Bank Indonesia) dan membentuk peraturan desa mengenai hutan rakyat dalam meminimalisir adanya tebang butuh serta strategi pemberdayaan sebagai langkah untuk memandirikan masyarakat semoyo dalam menumbuhkan ekonomi dengan tetap melindungi alam semoyo sebagai kawasan konservasi. Kata kunci: Gerakan sosial, hutan rakyat, Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, dan strategi gerakan.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90430270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The legal position between the drivers of online transportation services and the online transportation application service company is a partnership agreement as regulated in civil law. However, in practice the existing legal regulations have not provided legal protection to drivers of online transportation because not all drivers of online transportation understand their position as a partnership relationship. If it is associated with civil law, this is contrary to the principle of balance; it can even be said to be an abuse of the situation (misbruik van omstadigheden). The misuse of this situation can occur if an agreement is born due to economic excellence, psychological superiority and other advantages. The purpose of this study is to see how existing legal regulations actually runs effectively and efficiently in the community. The method of this research is qualitative research, namely based on the principles of law, doctrine and legislation that can answer the problems of this study. Keywords : Partnership Agreement, Driver, Online Transportation
网约车司机与网约车应用服务公司之间的法律地位是民法规定的合伙协议。然而，在实践中，现有的法律规定并没有为网络交通司机提供法律保护，因为并不是所有的网络交通司机都理解他们作为一种伙伴关系的地位。如果与民法相联系，则违背平衡原则;它甚至可以说是对形势的滥用(misbruik van omstadigheden)。如果一项协议是由于经济优势、心理优势和其他优势而诞生的，就可能发生这种情况的滥用。这项研究的目的是了解现有的法律法规如何在社区中有效和高效地运行。本研究的方法是定性研究，即基于能够回答本研究问题的法律原则、学说和立法。关键词:合作伙伴协议，司机，在线交通
{"title":"ANALISIS JURIDIS KEDUDUKAN PERJANJIAN KEMITRAAN ANTARA PENGEMUDI JASA ANGKUTAN ONLINE DAN PERUSAHAAN PROVIDER DITINJAU DARI ASPEK HUKUM KEPERDATAAN","authors":"Zuhriati Khalid","doi":"10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1207","url":null,"abstract":"The legal position between the drivers of online transportation services and the online transportation application service company is a partnership agreement as regulated in civil law. However, in practice the existing legal regulations have not provided legal protection to drivers of online transportation because not all drivers of online transportation understand their position as a partnership relationship. If it is associated with civil law, this is contrary to the principle of balance; it can even be said to be an abuse of the situation (misbruik van omstadigheden). The misuse of this situation can occur if an agreement is born due to economic excellence, psychological superiority and other advantages. The purpose of this study is to see how existing legal regulations actually runs effectively and efficiently in the community. The method of this research is qualitative research, namely based on the principles of law, doctrine and legislation that can answer the problems of this study. Keywords : Partnership Agreement, Driver, Online Transportation","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89209952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of settlement of debt receivables disputes between PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5 and Lisbon Manurung, defendant I, and Tetty Herawati, the defendant II. The settlement is carried out based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Simple Lawsuits because the value of the material claim does not exceed 200,000,000.00 Rupiahs (two hundred million rupiahs). The dispute ended with the ruling of the peace deed because of the good intentions of the parties who ended the dispute by means of peace. In the study of the decision, the author applied legal research in a normative juridical manner. The result of this study indicates that the legal analysis of debt settlement through agreements / deeds of peace has legal consequences for the parties, namely closed appeal and cassation legal efforts, which have permanent legal force, and executive power. Keywords: Debt and Receivables, Peace, Settlement.
ppt . Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5与被告I Lisbon Manurung和被告II Tetty Herawati之间的应收账款纠纷解决分析。和解是根据2015年最高法院关于简单诉讼完成程序的第2号条例进行的，因为物质索赔的价值不超过200,000,000.00卢比(2亿卢比)。由于以和平方式结束争端的各方的良好意图，争端以和平契约的裁决而结束。在对判决书的研究中，笔者以规范的司法方式运用法律研究。本研究结果表明，通过协议/和平契约解决债务的法律分析对当事人具有法律后果，即封闭上诉和撤销法律努力，具有永久的法律效力和执行力。关键词:债务与应收账款，和平，结算。
{"title":"ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HUTANG PIUTANG MELALUI AKTA PERDAMAIAN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 1/Pdt.G.S/2017/PN. Blg)","authors":"M. Sh.","doi":"10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1206","url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of settlement of debt receivables disputes between PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5 and Lisbon Manurung, defendant I, and Tetty Herawati, the defendant II. The settlement is carried out based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Simple Lawsuits because the value of the material claim does not exceed 200,000,000.00 Rupiahs (two hundred million rupiahs). The dispute ended with the ruling of the peace deed because of the good intentions of the parties who ended the dispute by means of peace. In the study of the decision, the author applied legal research in a normative juridical manner. The result of this study indicates that the legal analysis of debt settlement through agreements / deeds of peace has legal consequences for the parties, namely closed appeal and cassation legal efforts, which have permanent legal force, and executive power. Keywords: Debt and Receivables, Peace, Settlement.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79848905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：