Pub Date : 2022-12-27DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-439-448
Marina A. Pivovarova, E. V. Kononova
In the era when knowledge and information have become a strategic resource, theoretical and practical issues of building classification systems have seen an increased interest. The study of various library classifications, as well as their comparative analysis, allows us to identify local (and/or global) trends in the development of theory and practice of library and information activities. The multidimensional vision of heuristic potential as a complex of possibilities for finding effective new tools and techniques for solving complex problems has determined the scope and features of the research method. The purpose of the article is to determine the methodological mechanisms which can help expanding the capabilities of Library Bibliographical Classification (LBC) in solving cognitive, research and creative tasks. Realization of this goal was carried out on the basis of historical and methodological reconstruction method, rarely used at present. The object of historical and methodological reconstruction is the technology of knowledge organization. Subject scientific interest is focused on the study of a set of gnoseological tools and techniques that facilitate and simplify the solution of problems of library classification. Basing on the scientific publications of the staff of the Research Centre for the Development of LBC of the Russian State Library, as well as texts of Medium Schedules (2001—2019, issues 1—8), Abridged Schedules (2021) and Schedules for children’s and school libraries (2016), the authors present the original methodological base for updating the LBC of the Russian State Library. The paper reveals that the core of this methodological base is the method of scientific conjugation. The authors test the hypothesis of transformation of the LBC from the system of organizing the existing knowledge into a system of producing new knowledge with the expanded functionality. In addition to the traditional applied functions of the LBC — organizational, reference, information, methodological — classification also performs cognitive, enlightening, educational and research functions. The heuristic potential of the LBC is revealed through the knowledge and experience in different subject areas.
{"title":"Heuristic Potential of Library Bibliographic Classification","authors":"Marina A. Pivovarova, E. V. Kononova","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-439-448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-439-448","url":null,"abstract":"In the era when knowledge and information have become a strategic resource, theoretical and practical issues of building classification systems have seen an increased interest. The study of various library classifications, as well as their comparative analysis, allows us to identify local (and/or global) trends in the development of theory and practice of library and information activities. The multidimensional vision of heuristic potential as a complex of possibilities for finding effective new tools and techniques for solving complex problems has determined the scope and features of the research method. The purpose of the article is to determine the methodological mechanisms which can help expanding the capabilities of Library Bibliographical Classification (LBC) in solving cognitive, research and creative tasks. Realization of this goal was carried out on the basis of historical and methodological reconstruction method, rarely used at present. The object of historical and methodological reconstruction is the technology of knowledge organization. Subject scientific interest is focused on the study of a set of gnoseological tools and techniques that facilitate and simplify the solution of problems of library classification. Basing on the scientific publications of the staff of the Research Centre for the Development of LBC of the Russian State Library, as well as texts of Medium Schedules (2001—2019, issues 1—8), Abridged Schedules (2021) and Schedules for children’s and school libraries (2016), the authors present the original methodological base for updating the LBC of the Russian State Library. The paper reveals that the core of this methodological base is the method of scientific conjugation. The authors test the hypothesis of transformation of the LBC from the system of organizing the existing knowledge into a system of producing new knowledge with the expanded functionality. In addition to the traditional applied functions of the LBC — organizational, reference, information, methodological — classification also performs cognitive, enlightening, educational and research functions. The heuristic potential of the LBC is revealed through the knowledge and experience in different subject areas.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125944530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-27DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-449-455
M. I. Kamysheva
In 2022, the Publishing House “Pashkov Dom” of the Russian State Library released the bibliographic work “Journal ‘Bibliotekovedenie’: Index of Contents 1952—2021”. The publication was prepared by the Research Department of Bibliography of the Russian State Library for the 70th anniversary of the scientific and practical journal. The article briefly describes all the milestones of the leading professional publication: from the periodical scientific collection “Libraries of the USSR. Work experience” up to the contemporary journal “Bibliotekovedenie”. Materials of the periodical have significant scientific value. The compilers of the bibliographic index ordered and systematized publications, as well as characterized previous similar works — cumulative in-journal indexes of contents and the only index of 1984 until 2022 published by the V.I. Lenin State Library of the USSR. The author highlights the number of differences between the previous indexes dedicated to the journal and the 2022 edition, among them are the completeness of coverage of the material, the structure and methodology of systematization, the availability of reference apparatus, etc. The reference apparatus of the new edition consists of five auxiliary indexes (index of names, personalia, library and information organizations, peer-reviewed publications and library and information serials). The book includes four reference appendices (the list of editors-in-chief, members of the editorial board and the editorial council; bibliographic list of publications about the journal in the professional press; the list of acronyms of library and information organizations; the list of bibliographic sources). In the process of compiling the index, the compilers encountered difficulties at the stage of grouping the material. Over the entire period of the journal existence, publishing standards and drawing up of the publication have changed many times. The compilers executed the painstaking work to identify the authorship of individual publications, as well as the identity in the names of repeatedly renamed library and information organizations, and to reveal data on the personalia mentioned in the articles. The article gives the examples of drawing up of the index. The index of publications of the main professional periodical from 1952 to 2021 reflects the processes of development of science, evolution, transformation of scientific knowledge and makes the basis for the work of researchers at present, being the significant mechanism of scientific activity.
2022年，俄罗斯国家图书馆“Pashkov Dom”出版社出版了目录学著作《Journal ' Bibliotekovedenie: Index of Contents 1952-2021》。该出版物是由俄罗斯国家图书馆书目研究部为科学和实用期刊70周年而编写的。文章简要描述了主要专业出版物的所有里程碑:从期刊科学合集“苏联图书馆”。工作经历”达当代期刊“Bibliotekovedenie”。本刊资料具有重要的科学价值。书目索引的编纂者对出版物进行了排序和系统化，并描述了以前类似的作品-内容的累积期刊索引和苏联列宁国立图书馆出版的1984年至2022年的唯一索引。作者强调了之前的期刊专用指标与2022年版的差异，其中包括材料覆盖的完整性，系统化的结构和方法，参考仪器的可用性等。新版参考文献包括5个辅助索引(人名索引、人物索引、图书情报机构索引、同行评议出版物索引和图书情报丛刊索引)。这本书包括四个参考附录(主编、编辑委员会和编辑委员会成员名单;期刊在专业出版社发表的文献目录;图书馆及资讯机构的首字母缩写一览表;书目来源列表)。在编制索引的过程中，编写者在资料分组阶段遇到了困难。在期刊存在的整个过程中，期刊的出版标准和编制经历了多次变化。编纂者进行了艰苦的工作，以确定个别出版物的作者身份，以及反复改名的图书馆和信息组织的名称的身份，并揭示文章中提到的个人资料。文章给出了索引编制的实例。1952 - 2021年主要专业期刊的出版物索引反映了科学发展、科学知识演变、科学知识转化的过程，是当前科研人员工作的基础，是科学活动的重要机制。
{"title":"Bibliographic Index of the Contents of the Journal “Bibliotekovedenie”. To the 70th Anniversary of the Periodical","authors":"M. I. Kamysheva","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-449-455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-5-449-455","url":null,"abstract":"In 2022, the Publishing House “Pashkov Dom” of the Russian State Library released the bibliographic work “Journal ‘Bibliotekovedenie’: Index of Contents 1952—2021”. The publication was prepared by the Research Department of Bibliography of the Russian State Library for the 70th anniversary of the scientific and practical journal. The article briefly describes all the milestones of the leading professional publication: from the periodical scientific collection “Libraries of the USSR. Work experience” up to the contemporary journal “Bibliotekovedenie”. Materials of the periodical have significant scientific value. The compilers of the bibliographic index ordered and systematized publications, as well as characterized previous similar works — cumulative in-journal indexes of contents and the only index of 1984 until 2022 published by the V.I. Lenin State Library of the USSR. The author highlights the number of differences between the previous indexes dedicated to the journal and the 2022 edition, among them are the completeness of coverage of the material, the structure and methodology of systematization, the availability of reference apparatus, etc. The reference apparatus of the new edition consists of five auxiliary indexes (index of names, personalia, library and information organizations, peer-reviewed publications and library and information serials). The book includes four reference appendices (the list of editors-in-chief, members of the editorial board and the editorial council; bibliographic list of publications about the journal in the professional press; the list of acronyms of library and information organizations; the list of bibliographic sources). In the process of compiling the index, the compilers encountered difficulties at the stage of grouping the material. Over the entire period of the journal existence, publishing standards and drawing up of the publication have changed many times. The compilers executed the painstaking work to identify the authorship of individual publications, as well as the identity in the names of repeatedly renamed library and information organizations, and to reveal data on the personalia mentioned in the articles. The article gives the examples of drawing up of the index. The index of publications of the main professional periodical from 1952 to 2021 reflects the processes of development of science, evolution, transformation of scientific knowledge and makes the basis for the work of researchers at present, being the significant mechanism of scientific activity.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117262045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-413-421
Y. Stolyarov
The monograph “Proactive library in the information and educational environment of University” (2020) and the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences “University library as a proactive system: modern opportunities and development prospects” (2022; rejected by the Dissertation Council upon the results of defense) by R.A. Baryshev use methodologically flawed basis and theoretically are untenable. The monograph and dissertation on the so-called proactive university library as a system do not contain scientific novelty and of no practical value.The main idea of the “proactive library” is to focus on anticipating readers’ requests and, therefore, it requires reliance on forecasting methodology. However, the author of the monograph and dissertation presents other methodological grounds. The conceptual grounds that should form the essence of the theoretical development of the topic raised and should have theoretical novelty and scientific significance, in fact, are reduced to principles that have long been known and widely used in practice, and the key strategic directions that complement them, as the author himself notes, have been developed by an external institution. R.A. Baryshev did not show how the library services offered by him work ahead of requests. The monograph and dissertation do not contain information on what was exactly provided for in advance and what is the proportion of justified forecasts. The monograph was released without scientific review; it does not make any significant contribution to the library theory and practice. The main text is prepared on the materials of only one library — the Siberian Federal University, it has no grounds to claim generalizations that apply to all university libraries of the country. At the same time, the stated topic — forecasting of readers’ needs and requests and their preventive satisfaction — is of exceptional importance for library science and it requires qualified research.
{"title":"The Idea of “Proactive Library” in R.A. Baryshev’s Monograph and Dissertation as Manifestation of Dilettantism","authors":"Y. Stolyarov","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-413-421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-413-421","url":null,"abstract":"The monograph “Proactive library in the information and educational environment of University” (2020) and the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences “University library as a proactive system: modern opportunities and development prospects” (2022; rejected by the Dissertation Council upon the results of defense) by R.A. Baryshev use methodologically flawed basis and theoretically are untenable. The monograph and dissertation on the so-called proactive university library as a system do not contain scientific novelty and of no practical value.The main idea of the “proactive library” is to focus on anticipating readers’ requests and, therefore, it requires reliance on forecasting methodology. However, the author of the monograph and dissertation presents other methodological grounds. The conceptual grounds that should form the essence of the theoretical development of the topic raised and should have theoretical novelty and scientific significance, in fact, are reduced to principles that have long been known and widely used in practice, and the key strategic directions that complement them, as the author himself notes, have been developed by an external institution. R.A. Baryshev did not show how the library services offered by him work ahead of requests. The monograph and dissertation do not contain information on what was exactly provided for in advance and what is the proportion of justified forecasts. The monograph was released without scientific review; it does not make any significant contribution to the library theory and practice. The main text is prepared on the materials of only one library — the Siberian Federal University, it has no grounds to claim generalizations that apply to all university libraries of the country. At the same time, the stated topic — forecasting of readers’ needs and requests and their preventive satisfaction — is of exceptional importance for library science and it requires qualified research.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128532474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-401-412
I. Paramonova
There are many different types of libraries and librarians. In smaller libraries, often there is only one employee, solo librarian, in charge of all aspects of library work, from cataloging to reference-bibliographic service and from budgeting and planning to personnel management. In international practice, the term One-Person Library (OPL) is used to designate such libraries with one employee. Working alone places special demands on library professionals. Therefore, in the late 1970s, the solo librarianship movement arose in support of OPL employees abroad, which practically was almost unknown in Russia. According to some estimates, OPLs are about a third of all libraries in the world. The relevance of this topic is unquestionable, since the number of OPLs worldwide will only grow. It is the overall trend. The purpose of the work is to give general information about OPLs and show their specific features. The article is a review of foreign publications devoted to the problems of librarians and information professionals who work alone or solo. Not intended to be exhaustive, this review can serve as an introduction to the topic and outlines the main problems faced by this segment of the profession. Among the specific problems the author considers multitasking and lack of time, professional isolation and perceived lack of opportunity for professional growth, the threat of reduction and, as a result, the need to constantly demonstrate their value to management. Despite the difficulties, working alone has its advantages. The most obvious of them are independence in decision-making, diversity, an opportunity to prove themselves and develop new skill sets (managerial, leadership, communication). The author expresses the hope that this work will attract interest in the problem of OPL functioning and will serve as an incentive for further discussions of this topic in the professional library community.
有许多不同类型的图书馆和图书管理员。在规模较小的图书馆中，通常只有一名员工，即单独的图书管理员，负责图书馆工作的所有方面，从编目到参考书目服务，从预算和计划到人事管理。在国际实践中，使用“一人图书馆”(one - person Library, OPL)一词来表示只有一名员工的图书馆。单独工作对图书馆专业人员提出了特殊要求。因此，在20世纪70年代末，在海外OPL员工的支持下，出现了个人图书馆运动，这在俄罗斯几乎是不为人知的。据估计，opl约占世界上所有图书馆的三分之一。这一主题的相关性是毋庸置疑的，因为世界范围内的opo数量只会增加。这是总体趋势。这项工作的目的是提供关于opl的一般信息，并显示它们的具体特征。这篇文章是对国外出版物的回顾，专门讨论图书馆员和信息专业人员单独或独自工作的问题。本综述并不打算详尽无遗，但可以作为该主题的介绍，并概述了这部分专业所面临的主要问题。在具体问题中，提交人考虑了多任务处理和缺乏时间、专业隔离和缺乏专业成长机会、裁员的威胁以及因此需要不断证明其对管理的价值。尽管困难重重，独自工作也有它的好处。其中最明显的是决策的独立性、多样性、证明自己和发展新技能(管理、领导、沟通)的机会。作者表示希望这项工作将引起人们对OPL功能问题的兴趣，并将激励专业图书馆界进一步讨论这一主题。
{"title":"One-Person Library as an Object of Study","authors":"I. Paramonova","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-401-412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-401-412","url":null,"abstract":"There are many different types of libraries and librarians. In smaller libraries, often there is only one employee, solo librarian, in charge of all aspects of library work, from cataloging to reference-bibliographic service and from budgeting and planning to personnel management. In international practice, the term One-Person Library (OPL) is used to designate such libraries with one employee. Working alone places special demands on library professionals. Therefore, in the late 1970s, the solo librarianship movement arose in support of OPL employees abroad, which practically was almost unknown in Russia. According to some estimates, OPLs are about a third of all libraries in the world. The relevance of this topic is unquestionable, since the number of OPLs worldwide will only grow. It is the overall trend. The purpose of the work is to give general information about OPLs and show their specific features. The article is a review of foreign publications devoted to the problems of librarians and information professionals who work alone or solo. Not intended to be exhaustive, this review can serve as an introduction to the topic and outlines the main problems faced by this segment of the profession. Among the specific problems the author considers multitasking and lack of time, professional isolation and perceived lack of opportunity for professional growth, the threat of reduction and, as a result, the need to constantly demonstrate their value to management. Despite the difficulties, working alone has its advantages. The most obvious of them are independence in decision-making, diversity, an opportunity to prove themselves and develop new skill sets (managerial, leadership, communication). The author expresses the hope that this work will attract interest in the problem of OPL functioning and will serve as an incentive for further discussions of this topic in the professional library community.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116483515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-375-385
N. Gendina, E. Kosolapova
The authors reveal the role of cultural diplomacy as a tool for the exchange of cultural practices between different states in order to ensure mutual understanding and strengthen international stability. The purpose of the article is to show the example of participation of libraries and Universities in the implementation of the ideas of cultural diplomacy, to fill the gap in highlighting the experience of interaction in this area of Russia and Uzbekistan. The article analyses the experience of promoting the Russian concept of the formation of information culture of individual in Uzbekistan. The article interprets the information culture of individual as the most important factor of successful educational, professional and everyday activities, as well as social security of individual in the conditions of digital transformation of society. The authors characterize cooperation of the Research Institute of Information Technologies of the Social Sphere of the Kemerovo State Institute of Culture with the UNESCO Representative Office in Uzbekistan, the National Library of Uzbekistan named after A. Navoi and other library and educational organizations of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2015—2022. The paper emphasizes the fruitfulness of the implementation of the model of cultural diplomacy based on respect for other cultures, mutual cultural exchange in order to increase cultural wealth and a better understanding of the peculiarities of other states, nations and peoples. The authors formulate the principles that ensure the fruitfulness of such model of cultural diplomacy: interest, passion of the party that perceives others cultural experience, rather than imposing on it the achievements and values of another culture; systematic and consistent building up of contacts, instead of the one-time nature of individual events; adaptation of cultural experience and cultural practices to the traditions of their own culture, rather than mechanical copying of the achievements of another culture; reliance on a wide range of actors, valued participants who play a significant role in the implementation of cultural diplomacy; mutual cultural enrichment, mutual cultural exchange, and not the dictate of traditions and values of one culture.
{"title":"Cultural Diplomacy and Libraries: the Experience of Russia and Uzbekistan","authors":"N. Gendina, E. Kosolapova","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-375-385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-375-385","url":null,"abstract":"The authors reveal the role of cultural diplomacy as a tool for the exchange of cultural practices between different states in order to ensure mutual understanding and strengthen international stability. The purpose of the article is to show the example of participation of libraries and Universities in the implementation of the ideas of cultural diplomacy, to fill the gap in highlighting the experience of interaction in this area of Russia and Uzbekistan. The article analyses the experience of promoting the Russian concept of the formation of information culture of individual in Uzbekistan. The article interprets the information culture of individual as the most important factor of successful educational, professional and everyday activities, as well as social security of individual in the conditions of digital transformation of society. The authors characterize cooperation of the Research Institute of Information Technologies of the Social Sphere of the Kemerovo State Institute of Culture with the UNESCO Representative Office in Uzbekistan, the National Library of Uzbekistan named after A. Navoi and other library and educational organizations of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2015—2022. The paper emphasizes the fruitfulness of the implementation of the model of cultural diplomacy based on respect for other cultures, mutual cultural exchange in order to increase cultural wealth and a better understanding of the peculiarities of other states, nations and peoples. The authors formulate the principles that ensure the fruitfulness of such model of cultural diplomacy: interest, passion of the party that perceives others cultural experience, rather than imposing on it the achievements and values of another culture; systematic and consistent building up of contacts, instead of the one-time nature of individual events; adaptation of cultural experience and cultural practices to the traditions of their own culture, rather than mechanical copying of the achievements of another culture; reliance on a wide range of actors, valued participants who play a significant role in the implementation of cultural diplomacy; mutual cultural enrichment, mutual cultural exchange, and not the dictate of traditions and values of one culture.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116970667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-423-430
Elena N. Volkhonskaya
On September 2—5, 2022, the 35th Moscow International Book Fair (MIBF) was held in Moscow at the Gostiny Dvor Exhibition Centre. More than 300 publishers from 28 regions of the Russian Federation presented their books. Representatives from 21 countries, including seven CIS member states, attended the Book Fair program. Within the framework of the 35th MIBF, 344 events took place at 11 sites that were accompanied by various book exhibitions. In the context of the key events for the book industry and librarianship that took place at the 35th MIBF (the National competition “Book of the Year”, the 10th All-Russian competition of the Russian Library Association “Best Professional Book of the Year”, the conference “Russian Book Market — 2022”, the 11th competition of professional skills “Auditor”), the participation of libraries in the cultural life of the society, their achievements and initiatives aimed at promoting books and reading were noted, creative projects, including book publishing, were presented. The article summarizes the results of participation of the Russian State Library (RSL) and the RSL publishing house “Pashkov Dom” in the 35th Moscow International Book Fair.
{"title":"Book Diversity and Fireworks of Events: the 35th Moscow International Book Fair","authors":"Elena N. Volkhonskaya","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-423-430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-423-430","url":null,"abstract":"On September 2—5, 2022, the 35th Moscow International Book Fair (MIBF) was held in Moscow at the Gostiny Dvor Exhibition Centre. More than 300 publishers from 28 regions of the Russian Federation presented their books. Representatives from 21 countries, including seven CIS member states, attended the Book Fair program. Within the framework of the 35th MIBF, 344 events took place at 11 sites that were accompanied by various book exhibitions. In the context of the key events for the book industry and librarianship that took place at the 35th MIBF (the National competition “Book of the Year”, the 10th All-Russian competition of the Russian Library Association “Best Professional Book of the Year”, the conference “Russian Book Market — 2022”, the 11th competition of professional skills “Auditor”), the participation of libraries in the cultural life of the society, their achievements and initiatives aimed at promoting books and reading were noted, creative projects, including book publishing, were presented. The article summarizes the results of participation of the Russian State Library (RSL) and the RSL publishing house “Pashkov Dom” in the 35th Moscow International Book Fair.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121265357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-351-361
E. Beskaravaynaya, T. Kharybina
The authors offer their view of popularization of science making the results of bibliometric analysis accessible via the library’s website. Traditionally, research scientists want to know if their scientific publications have been referenced in reputable bibliographic databases or find out how many citations the paper generated over a given time period, or how to get the H-index, or explore more current, related research on their topic. The focus of the study was to identify information, which is not related to one user, but is required by the recipients overall. Working through the data, helps to perform ongoing evaluation of scientific institution activity. The survey was conducted among specialists of the Federal Research Center “Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (PSCBR RAS). After studying the information needs of scientists, there were identified the inquires noted in the largest number of questionnaires: the dynamics of publication activity sorted by year, the most productive authors, international cooperation, the most cited and funded scientific trends. The material was gathered from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases, and the results of the analysis were posted on the website of the Central Library of the Pushchino Scientific Center (Department of the Library for Natural Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences).The analysis was carried out within the framework of the PSCBR RAS works. The time period for bibliometric research is 2016—2020. During that period, the research activity of scientists of the PSCBR RAS covered 387 scientific areas. Bibliometric analysis showed 1139 editions where the works of researchers of the PSCBR RAS were published. The authors identified 30 the most popular journals on the subject areas of the PSCBR RAS, in which 35% of all articles were concentrated. In 2016—2020, scientists of PSCBR RAS together with foreign colleagues from 95 countries prepared 171 publications. According to the WoS CC and Scopus indicators, 2834 authors were registered with the affiliation of the PSCBR RAS.With respect to science communication, this paper presents findings aimed at demonstrating the achievements and contributions made by the scholars from PSCBR RAS on a global stage, thereby motivating young scientists for research activities in the Center, and getting attention in mass media.Library staff members who perform this job are able to show the highest professional performance — to acquaint readers with the practical potential of bibliometric analysis: to help find journals most appropriate for user’s research; to provide information on the authors of publications based on the analysis of the number of citations of these papers for future possible joint project, to determine scientific directions that receive the most financial support. The libraryʼs website assumes the role of an external interface to demonstrate the achievements of the PSCBR RAS.
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis — as Library Activity in the Field of Science Popularization","authors":"E. Beskaravaynaya, T. Kharybina","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-351-361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-351-361","url":null,"abstract":"The authors offer their view of popularization of science making the results of bibliometric analysis accessible via the library’s website. Traditionally, research scientists want to know if their scientific publications have been referenced in reputable bibliographic databases or find out how many citations the paper generated over a given time period, or how to get the H-index, or explore more current, related research on their topic. The focus of the study was to identify information, which is not related to one user, but is required by the recipients overall. Working through the data, helps to perform ongoing evaluation of scientific institution activity. The survey was conducted among specialists of the Federal Research Center “Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (PSCBR RAS). After studying the information needs of scientists, there were identified the inquires noted in the largest number of questionnaires: the dynamics of publication activity sorted by year, the most productive authors, international cooperation, the most cited and funded scientific trends. The material was gathered from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases, and the results of the analysis were posted on the website of the Central Library of the Pushchino Scientific Center (Department of the Library for Natural Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences).The analysis was carried out within the framework of the PSCBR RAS works. The time period for bibliometric research is 2016—2020. During that period, the research activity of scientists of the PSCBR RAS covered 387 scientific areas. Bibliometric analysis showed 1139 editions where the works of researchers of the PSCBR RAS were published. The authors identified 30 the most popular journals on the subject areas of the PSCBR RAS, in which 35% of all articles were concentrated. In 2016—2020, scientists of PSCBR RAS together with foreign colleagues from 95 countries prepared 171 publications. According to the WoS CC and Scopus indicators, 2834 authors were registered with the affiliation of the PSCBR RAS.With respect to science communication, this paper presents findings aimed at demonstrating the achievements and contributions made by the scholars from PSCBR RAS on a global stage, thereby motivating young scientists for research activities in the Center, and getting attention in mass media.Library staff members who perform this job are able to show the highest professional performance — to acquaint readers with the practical potential of bibliometric analysis: to help find journals most appropriate for user’s research; to provide information on the authors of publications based on the analysis of the number of citations of these papers for future possible joint project, to determine scientific directions that receive the most financial support. The libraryʼs website assumes the role of an external interface to demonstrate the achievements of the PSCBR RAS.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134267852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-343-350
O. V. Andronenko, Gennadiy L. Ruksha
Federal Law No. 85-FZ of 05.04.2021 “On Amendments to the Federal Law ‘On Education in the Russian Federation’” defines the significance of educational activities. The article presents the forms of the modern process of education carried out by the commonwealth of cultural subjects, formerly called cultural and educational, including libraries.Currently, there are used technologies of traditional cultural practices, creative technologies, as well as fragments of mass culture technologies. The technological arsenal of cultural institutions in education is complemented by electronic resources and opportunities provided in the online environment. These issues affect the variety of cultural institutions, but library systems will be in the lead. Communication interaction will not only remain the proven tool of the educational process in libraries, but will also strengthen. The authors supplement this thesis with examples from the activities of libraries in the Krasnoyarsk Region. The kind of catalyst for creative processes in libraries is the activity of employees of municipal libraries in the design and implementation of justification for inclusion in prestigious large-scale modernization projects (National project “Culture” for the creation of model libraries, the Krasnoyarsk Regional network project “Libraries of the Future”).The authors identify the possible risks of intensification of this area of activity, which can be overcome by using both traditional and innovative methods of work.
{"title":"New Realities of Educational Practices. The Example of Libraries Activity in the Krasnoyarsk Region","authors":"O. V. Andronenko, Gennadiy L. Ruksha","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-343-350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-343-350","url":null,"abstract":"Federal Law No. 85-FZ of 05.04.2021 “On Amendments to the Federal Law ‘On Education in the Russian Federation’” defines the significance of educational activities. The article presents the forms of the modern process of education carried out by the commonwealth of cultural subjects, formerly called cultural and educational, including libraries.Currently, there are used technologies of traditional cultural practices, creative technologies, as well as fragments of mass culture technologies. The technological arsenal of cultural institutions in education is complemented by electronic resources and opportunities provided in the online environment. These issues affect the variety of cultural institutions, but library systems will be in the lead. Communication interaction will not only remain the proven tool of the educational process in libraries, but will also strengthen. The authors supplement this thesis with examples from the activities of libraries in the Krasnoyarsk Region. The kind of catalyst for creative processes in libraries is the activity of employees of municipal libraries in the design and implementation of justification for inclusion in prestigious large-scale modernization projects (National project “Culture” for the creation of model libraries, the Krasnoyarsk Regional network project “Libraries of the Future”).The authors identify the possible risks of intensification of this area of activity, which can be overcome by using both traditional and innovative methods of work.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130017341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-363-373
O. Kolesnikova, Nikita A. Laut
In the conditions of rapidly developing information society in Russia, the problem of ensuring children’s media security is becoming more urgent. Low-quality children’s literature (media products) is sold, distributed on the Internet, is in public and family libraries. Russian children currently are not protected from the influence of content that can have a re-socializing effect and promote destructive behaviour models. When choosing an interesting and useful book, children may be influenced by suggestions that are destructive to the personality of young reader. The authors substantiate the expediency of introducing the concept of “media security of childrenʼs reading” into the theory and practice of reading activity, both in relation to books and media products in general. The authors propose to solve the problem of the potentially possible re-socializing impact of some works of modern childrenʼs literature (media products) through the introduction of socio-cultural projects within the framework of information and recommendation support. At the same time, such support should include the creation of recommendation information and library products posted on the official websites of childrenʼs libraries and their online communities in the media environment, as well as the organization of their provision to users.The paper presents the results of library and pedagogical experiment, during which the socio-cultural project was developed, realized and implemented in the Pushkin Central Municipal Library of Kirov and tested in the parent community of younger schoolchildren, aimed at including the media security model proposed by the authors in the information and recommendation support for childrenʼs reading. The results obtained of project implementation indicate the effectiveness of the developed socio-cultural project, which is able to prevent the negative impact of low-quality literature.
{"title":"Media Security of Childrenʼs Reading: Project Activity in the Library Media Environment","authors":"O. Kolesnikova, Nikita A. Laut","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-363-373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-363-373","url":null,"abstract":"In the conditions of rapidly developing information society in Russia, the problem of ensuring children’s media security is becoming more urgent. Low-quality children’s literature (media products) is sold, distributed on the Internet, is in public and family libraries. Russian children currently are not protected from the influence of content that can have a re-socializing effect and promote destructive behaviour models. When choosing an interesting and useful book, children may be influenced by suggestions that are destructive to the personality of young reader. The authors substantiate the expediency of introducing the concept of “media security of childrenʼs reading” into the theory and practice of reading activity, both in relation to books and media products in general. The authors propose to solve the problem of the potentially possible re-socializing impact of some works of modern childrenʼs literature (media products) through the introduction of socio-cultural projects within the framework of information and recommendation support. At the same time, such support should include the creation of recommendation information and library products posted on the official websites of childrenʼs libraries and their online communities in the media environment, as well as the organization of their provision to users.The paper presents the results of library and pedagogical experiment, during which the socio-cultural project was developed, realized and implemented in the Pushkin Central Municipal Library of Kirov and tested in the parent community of younger schoolchildren, aimed at including the media security model proposed by the authors in the information and recommendation support for childrenʼs reading. The results obtained of project implementation indicate the effectiveness of the developed socio-cultural project, which is able to prevent the negative impact of low-quality literature.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125757020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-28DOI: 10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-387-399
Vladimir R. Firsov, Polina A. Lodygina
The authors analyse the basic principles and nature of research work (R&D) in the library sphere in the 1960s-1980s. During that period, O.D. Golubeva, Deputy Director of the M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin State Public Library (GPB), the main research and coordination centre in the field of library science, bibliography and book studies in the RSFSR, was engaged in organizing scientific activities. The article considers the regulatory framework defining the organization of R&D in the field of librarianship, the nature of interaction of GPB with provincial, regional, republican (ASSR) libraries of Russia, as well as with institutions of other agencies. The authors show the importance of consolidated and coordination plans of research in library science, bibliography and book studies in the RSFSR as the most important tools of joint work. The authors characterize the main problems investigated during the study period and the principles of the formation of scientific work plans, as well as establish the role of centralized and regional studies. The paper presents information about the manuals prepared by the GPB on the methods and tools of library research. The authors consider the organization of work on the implementation of R&D results, as well as identify and present the sources characterizing the flow of scientific publications of the GPB of that period. The article systematizes and formulates the basic principles of the organization of R&D work. The authors consider the reasons for the creation of library system in the modern conditions as implementation of the task set in the “Strategy for the development of librarianship in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030”. The article concludes on the usefulness of taking into account the work experience of O.D. Golubeva in the solution of this problem.
{"title":"Research Work in the 1960s — 1980s as a Factor in the Creation of Library System","authors":"Vladimir R. Firsov, Polina A. Lodygina","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-387-399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-387-399","url":null,"abstract":"The authors analyse the basic principles and nature of research work (R&D) in the library sphere in the 1960s-1980s. During that period, O.D. Golubeva, Deputy Director of the M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin State Public Library (GPB), the main research and coordination centre in the field of library science, bibliography and book studies in the RSFSR, was engaged in organizing scientific activities. The article considers the regulatory framework defining the organization of R&D in the field of librarianship, the nature of interaction of GPB with provincial, regional, republican (ASSR) libraries of Russia, as well as with institutions of other agencies. The authors show the importance of consolidated and coordination plans of research in library science, bibliography and book studies in the RSFSR as the most important tools of joint work. The authors characterize the main problems investigated during the study period and the principles of the formation of scientific work plans, as well as establish the role of centralized and regional studies. The paper presents information about the manuals prepared by the GPB on the methods and tools of library research. The authors consider the organization of work on the implementation of R&D results, as well as identify and present the sources characterizing the flow of scientific publications of the GPB of that period. The article systematizes and formulates the basic principles of the organization of R&D work. The authors consider the reasons for the creation of library system in the modern conditions as implementation of the task set in the “Strategy for the development of librarianship in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030”. The article concludes on the usefulness of taking into account the work experience of O.D. Golubeva in the solution of this problem.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129321513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：