Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190032
F. Duarte, Rafael Mario Iorio Filho
As part of our research interest, applying the semiolinguistic methodology of discourse analysis and the method of comparison by difference, the latter borrowed from Antropology, we aim to provide a description of native and /or theoretical categories of the Brazilian legal culture in contrast with American legal culture, in order illuminate the idea that legal systems cannot be translated or verted straightforwardly as if it were a mere lexicon translation challenge. There is much more about it that relates to meaning and understanding that surpass the linguistic problem. That is what we intend to convey with our effort. On this presentation we will describe the Brazilian system whereas our colleague Prof. Ritchie will deal with the US model. So, the goal of both presentations is to discuss the different approach to judicial deference in Brazil ́s and the United State’s legal systems – here considered as a cultural endeavor taken by each country’s Supreme Court.
{"title":"Seção Especial (P.316-316):JUDICIAL DEFERENCE IN BRAZIL AND IN THE UNITED STATES OF\u0000 AMERICA: A comparative overview","authors":"F. Duarte, Rafael Mario Iorio Filho","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190032","url":null,"abstract":"As part of our research interest, applying the semiolinguistic methodology of discourse analysis and the method of comparison by difference, the latter borrowed from Antropology, we aim to provide a description of native and /or theoretical categories of the Brazilian legal culture in contrast with American legal culture, in order illuminate the idea that legal systems cannot be translated or verted straightforwardly as if it were a mere lexicon translation challenge. There is much more about it that relates to meaning and understanding that surpass the linguistic problem. That is what we intend to convey with our effort. On this presentation we will describe the Brazilian system whereas our colleague Prof. Ritchie will deal with the US model. So, the goal of both presentations is to discuss the different approach to judicial deference in Brazil ́s and the United State’s legal systems – here considered as a cultural endeavor taken by each country’s Supreme Court.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132458040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190020
Cláudio Novaes Pinto Coelho, Augusto Moutella Nepomuceno
{"title":"Programas de integridade como instrumento de boa governança pública: o FCPA e o\u0000 U.K. Bribery como normas inspiradoras","authors":"Cláudio Novaes Pinto Coelho, Augusto Moutella Nepomuceno","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130857196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210018
Roger Luiz Paz de Almeida, Adriana Lo Presti Mendonça, Leonam da Costa Portela
The study consists of documentary, bibliographic and statistical analysis of deforestation in the Amazon, relating to the new coronavirus. It is possible to affirm that the Amazon is under a double epidemic: one resulting from the emergence of the coronavirus, which spreads in cities and rural locations, indigenous and quilombola villages with greater violence, due to the lack of public policies in offering infrastructure and medicine for riverside and traditional peoples, in addition to the difficulty of access in view of the region's logistics; and the other, due to deforestation. The hypothesis presented consists of the intrinsic relationship between the proliferation of coronavirus and the increase in deforestation rates in the Amazon region. The result of the research, according to texts and statistics, consists of the worrying observation: the Amazon is under a double epidemic. The methodological option involves a descriptive research and systematic review of the literature, carried out through bibliographic, documentary and statistical research, with analysis of the legal instruments, normative texts, doctrine, jurisprudence and the literature already published in the form of books, magazines, articles, individual publications, specialized publications, written press and official data published on the Internet, which address directly or indirectly the subject under analysis. Studies show that tropical deforestation can provide requirements for new respiratory diseases due to the high number of fires, which can lead to a significant increase in these diseases during a pandemic season, and it should be noted whether there is an intrinsic relationship between deforestation and the advancement of coronavirus, especially in the Amazonian summer period.
{"title":"O DESMATAMENTO E O CORONAVÍRUS - UMA DUPLA EPIDEMIA NA AMAZÔNIA","authors":"Roger Luiz Paz de Almeida, Adriana Lo Presti Mendonça, Leonam da Costa Portela","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210018","url":null,"abstract":"The study consists of documentary, bibliographic and statistical analysis of deforestation in the Amazon, relating to the new coronavirus. It is possible to affirm that the Amazon is under a double epidemic: one resulting from the emergence of the coronavirus, which spreads in cities and rural locations, indigenous and quilombola villages with greater violence, due to the lack of public policies in offering infrastructure and medicine for riverside and traditional peoples, in addition to the difficulty of access in view of the region's logistics; and the other, due to deforestation. The hypothesis presented consists of the intrinsic relationship between the proliferation of coronavirus and the increase in deforestation rates in the Amazon region. The result of the research, according to texts and statistics, consists of the worrying observation: the Amazon is under a double epidemic. The methodological option involves a descriptive research and systematic review of the literature, carried out through bibliographic, documentary and statistical research, with analysis of the legal instruments, normative texts, doctrine, jurisprudence and the literature already published in the form of books, magazines, articles, individual publications, specialized publications, written press and official data published on the Internet, which address directly or indirectly the subject under analysis. Studies show that tropical deforestation can provide requirements for new respiratory diseases due to the high number of fires, which can lead to a significant increase in these diseases during a pandemic season, and it should be noted whether there is an intrinsic relationship between deforestation and the advancement of coronavirus, especially in the Amazonian summer period.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131088292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210026
Welliton Caixeta Maciel
{"title":"Masculinidades Violentas e Indignação Moral: Percepções sobre a utilização da Monitoração Eletrônica conjugada com Grupos Reflexivos de Gênero para agressores em Belo Horizonte/MG","authors":"Welliton Caixeta Maciel","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131217263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210038
Marcella do Amparo Monteiro Freire, Michel Lobo Toledo Lima
In the present article we describe and analyze judgments of divorce alimony payment cases in Family Courts in the State of Rio de Janeiro between 2019 and 2020. The problematic explored here is the perceived contradiction between the situational moralities that guide the judge`s decisions, which is translated into the native category “each case is a case”, and the principle of legal security, based mainly on the predictability of decisions in similar cases. There is a paradoxical tension between the practices and doctrinal ideals of law in the judicial field. The data from the field work demonstrates that the magistrates decide guided by several moral 1 Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Veiga de Almeida (UVA); especialista em Direito Privado e Processo Civil pela Universidade Gama Filho (UGF); especialista em Direito pela Escola de Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ); graduada em Direito pela Universidade Gama Filho (UGF); analista do Ministério Público do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. 2 Doutor e mestre em Sociologia pelo Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (IESP/UERJ); pós-graduado em Políticas Públicas de Justiça Criminal e Segurança Pública pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF); graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio); professor visitante do Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da Universidade Veiga de Almeida (PPGD-UVA); pesquisador de pós-doutorado FAPERJ nota 10 no PPGD-UVA; pesquisador do Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração Institucional de Conflitos (INCT/InEAC-UFF).
在本文中，我们描述和分析了2019年至2020年期间里约热内卢州家庭法院离婚赡养费案件的判决。这里探讨的问题是，指导法官决策的情境道德与法律安全原则之间的矛盾，情境道德被翻译成“每个案件都是一个案件”的本土范畴，而法律安全原则主要基于类似案件的判决的可预测性。在司法领域，法律的实践与理论理想之间存在着矛盾的张力。实地工作的数据表明，地方法官的决定是在几个道德准则的指导下做出的:1 . Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Veiga de Almeida (UVA);伽马菲略大学(UGF)特别行政主管和民事进程;里约热内卢州地方行政长官特别委员会;毕业于伽马菲略大学(UGF);2里约热内卢州立大学社会科学研究所和里约热内卢州立大学(IESP/UERJ);pós-graduado em Políticas Públicas联邦司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法与刑事司法;里约热内卢大学(Católica -Rio);维加-阿尔梅达大学(PPGD-UVA)研究项目Pós-graduação客座教授;pós-doutorado faperjnota 10 no PPGD-UVA;行政比较与冲突机构研究所(执行局/非洲经委会-联合国行政比较与冲突研究所)代表。
{"title":"“Cada Caso é um Caso”: as moralidades situacionais nos acordos envolvendo pensões alimentícias entre ex-cônjuges","authors":"Marcella do Amparo Monteiro Freire, Michel Lobo Toledo Lima","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210038","url":null,"abstract":"In the present article we describe and analyze judgments of divorce alimony payment cases in Family Courts in the State of Rio de Janeiro between 2019 and 2020. The problematic explored here is the perceived contradiction between the situational moralities that guide the judge`s decisions, which is translated into the native category “each case is a case”, and the principle of legal security, based mainly on the predictability of decisions in similar cases. There is a paradoxical tension between the practices and doctrinal ideals of law in the judicial field. The data from the field work demonstrates that the magistrates decide guided by several moral 1 Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Veiga de Almeida (UVA); especialista em Direito Privado e Processo Civil pela Universidade Gama Filho (UGF); especialista em Direito pela Escola de Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ); graduada em Direito pela Universidade Gama Filho (UGF); analista do Ministério Público do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. 2 Doutor e mestre em Sociologia pelo Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (IESP/UERJ); pós-graduado em Políticas Públicas de Justiça Criminal e Segurança Pública pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF); graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio); professor visitante do Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da Universidade Veiga de Almeida (PPGD-UVA); pesquisador de pós-doutorado FAPERJ nota 10 no PPGD-UVA; pesquisador do Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração Institucional de Conflitos (INCT/InEAC-UFF).","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126909595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"O BRASIL E A EXECUÇÃO PECUNIÁRIA DA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS","authors":"Dimas Pereira Duarte Júnior, Diogo Calasans Melo Andrade, Flávio Prado Fonseca","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114660572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190019
G. S. Siqueira
{"title":"Mario Losano no Brasil: entre política, sociologia e história do direito\u0000 (2012-2018)","authors":"G. S. Siqueira","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"754 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115881885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210034
Ana Rita Andrade Nascimento, L. Lages, D. Reis, J. Neves
The presence of an defense attorney is mandatory for the criminal procedure, since one of it’s legal grounds is the right to defense. Therefore, comprehending the role of the defense attorney - public or private – is essential to understand the course of criminal procedures. Thus, based on the analysis of processes completed during the period from 2007 to 2017 in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais -Brazil, this paper aims to investigate the differences between private and public legal defense and to define the relevance of this distinction in the realm of drug trafficking procedure. Regarding the results, no statistically significant difference was found between legal defenses exercised by a private lawyer or public defender, both in the course of the procedure or in the sentencing. In our view, this result indicates that the suspect, when accused for drug trafficking, is previously judged as a deviant, and the defense arguments are unable to change this perception of the judicial body.
{"title":"Diferenças entre a defesa pública e privada: como elas afetam a condenação no processo de tráfico de drogas?","authors":"Ana Rita Andrade Nascimento, L. Lages, D. Reis, J. Neves","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210034","url":null,"abstract":"The presence of an defense attorney is mandatory for the criminal procedure, since one of it’s legal grounds is the right to defense. Therefore, comprehending the role of the defense attorney - public or private – is essential to understand the course of criminal procedures. Thus, based on the analysis of processes completed during the period from 2007 to 2017 in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais -Brazil, this paper aims to investigate the differences between private and public legal defense and to define the relevance of this distinction in the realm of drug trafficking procedure. Regarding the results, no statistically significant difference was found between legal defenses exercised by a private lawyer or public defender, both in the course of the procedure or in the sentencing. In our view, this result indicates that the suspect, when accused for drug trafficking, is previously judged as a deviant, and the defense arguments are unable to change this perception of the judicial body.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115220351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20200021
Tarcisio Vieira Gonçalves, Leandro Corrêa de Oliveira
This article analyzes the model of the hearing for democratic process management from a proceduralist conception of law. The question raised is whether, and how, this methodology can contribute to the implementation of the democratic constitutional processualism. Therefore, the analytical and bibliographic methods and the theoretical contributions of Habermas and Nunes are used. It is observed that the hearing, known by orality, is an important instrument in the search to reach those goals, in order to consecrate the notions of copartnership and polycentrism.
{"title":"A Audiência de Gestão Democrática na perspectiva da Concepção Jurídica\u0000 Procedimentalista","authors":"Tarcisio Vieira Gonçalves, Leandro Corrêa de Oliveira","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20200021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20200021","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the model of the hearing for democratic process management from a proceduralist conception of law. The question raised is whether, and how, this methodology can contribute to the implementation of the democratic constitutional processualism. Therefore, the analytical and bibliographic methods and the theoretical contributions of Habermas and Nunes are used. It is observed that the hearing, known by orality, is an important instrument in the search to reach those goals, in order to consecrate the notions of copartnership and polycentrism.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121075314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210027
Marilha Gabriela Reverendo Garau
The present work aims to describe and analyze, in a contrasting way, speeches, practices, and moralities present in the representations of criminal judges when valuing testimonial evidence in drug trafficking cases. Starting from the dense description of Criminal Hearings in the Baixada Fluminense of Rio de Janeiro and Juzgados de Instrucción and Juicios Orales in the capital of Malaga, I identify that in the local context the process of equation of versions presented goes through the unequal identification of those who present themselves in court. The characteristic of inquisitoriality, expressed in the presumption of veracity of documents produced by the institutions, reinforces the presumption of the defendant's guilt, as well as the untruth of versions erected by the defense. In the foreign context of the other legal sensitivity of the Civil Law tradition, although there is also a delimited profile of criminal subjection, the 1 Doutora em Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais (PPGSD/UFF). Pesquisadora associada ao Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração Institucional de Conflitos (INCT-inEAC) e ao Laboratório de Estudos sobre Conflito, Cidadania e Segurança Pública (Laesp).
本工作旨在以对比的方式描述和分析刑事法官在评估贩毒案件证词证据时所表现出的言论、做法和道德。从里约热内卢的Baixada Fluminense以及首都马拉加的Juzgados de Instrucción和Juicios Orales对刑事听证会的密集描述开始，我发现在当地背景下，呈现的版本方程式的过程是通过对出庭者的不平等认同来进行的。讯问性的特点，表现在对机构提供的文件的真实性的推定上，强化了被告有罪的推定，以及辩方所建立的版本的不真实性。在民法传统的其他法律敏感性的外国背景下，虽然也有一个界定的刑事从属的轮廓，1 Doutora em Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais (PPGSD/UFF)。国家比较与行政研究机构(INCT-inEAC)与国家冲突研究机构(INCT-inEAC)之间的联系:国家冲突研究机构(Laboratório)、国家比较与行政研究机构Pública (lasp)。
{"title":"(A)creditação de testemunhas: práticas judiciais na Instrução e Julgamento de crimes de drogas no Brasil e na Espanha","authors":"Marilha Gabriela Reverendo Garau","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210027","url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to describe and analyze, in a contrasting way, speeches, practices, and moralities present in the representations of criminal judges when valuing testimonial evidence in drug trafficking cases. Starting from the dense description of Criminal Hearings in the Baixada Fluminense of Rio de Janeiro and Juzgados de Instrucción and Juicios Orales in the capital of Malaga, I identify that in the local context the process of equation of versions presented goes through the unequal identification of those who present themselves in court. The characteristic of inquisitoriality, expressed in the presumption of veracity of documents produced by the institutions, reinforces the presumption of the defendant's guilt, as well as the untruth of versions erected by the defense. In the foreign context of the other legal sensitivity of the Civil Law tradition, although there is also a delimited profile of criminal subjection, the 1 Doutora em Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais (PPGSD/UFF). Pesquisadora associada ao Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração Institucional de Conflitos (INCT-inEAC) e ao Laboratório de Estudos sobre Conflito, Cidadania e Segurança Pública (Laesp).","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121186427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：