首页 > 最新文献

Revista Juris Poiesis最新文献

英文 中文
A (In) Compatibilidade do Princípio da Capacidade Contributiva com as Taxas (A)缴款能力原则与费率的兼容性
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190045
Jadson Correia de Oliveira, Leonardo Máximo Barbos, Ivan Luiz Ferreira da Silva
The purpose of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the principle of the contributory capacity provided by the Federal Constitution with the public services tax. Establishing the difference between legal text and legal norm, argues that the fact that art. 145, paragraph 1, of the constitutional text, only expressly provides for the application of the principle of taxable capacity, does not preclude its application to public services tax. It argues that the substantive criteria of justice upheld by the constituent power in 1988 impose the need for fiscal justice, which necessarily means that taxpayers must comply with their ability to pay. Doctrinal understandings on the subject are discussed, as well as the position of the Federal Supreme Court. Finally, it emphasizes that the application of the principle by the legislator, in the institution of the taxes, must observe the peculiarities proper to the tax species. 1 Doutor em Direito pela PUC/SP. Mestre em Direito pela UNICAP. Especialista em Direito Público pela Escola Superior da Magistratura de Pernambuco ESMAPE. Advogado. Professor da Faculdade Sete de Setembro FASETE, em Paulo Afonso BA e da Universidade Católica do Salvador, graduação e do mestrado. Mestrando em Direito Público pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas UFAL. Especialista em Direito Tributário pela UNIDERP. Procurador do Estado de Alagoas. 3 Doutor e mestre em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco UFPE. Procurador do Estado de Alagoas. Advogado. Professor da Faculdade Sete de Setembro FASETE, em Paulo Afonso – BA.
本文的目的是分析联邦宪法规定的分摊能力原则与公共服务税的兼容性。确立了法律文本与法律规范的区别,论证了艺术的事实。宪法文本第145条第1款仅明确规定应税能力原则的适用,并不排除其适用于公共服务税。它认为,1988年组成权力所坚持的实质性公正标准要求财政公正,这必然意味着纳税人必须遵守他们的支付能力。讨论了对这个问题的理论理解,以及联邦最高法院的立场。最后,强调了在税收制度中,立法者对这一原则的运用必须遵循税种的特殊性。1电源开关电源PUC/SP。Mestre em Direito pela UNICAP。特别行政长官Público伯南布哥省高等行政长官。Advogado。萨尔瓦多萨尔瓦多大学教授,Paulo Afonso博士Católica萨尔瓦多大学硕士,毕业于萨尔瓦多萨尔瓦多大学。Mestrando em Direito Público pela Alagoas联邦大学ual。特别报告员Tributário pela工发和发展方案。阿拉戈斯州检察长。3 .伯南布哥联邦大学行政主管办公室。阿拉戈斯州检察长。Advogado。巴西工业技术学院教授,保罗·阿方索-文学学士。
{"title":"A (In) Compatibilidade do Princípio da Capacidade Contributiva com as Taxas","authors":"Jadson Correia de Oliveira, Leonardo Máximo Barbos, Ivan Luiz Ferreira da Silva","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190045","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the principle of the contributory capacity provided by the Federal Constitution with the public services tax. Establishing the difference between legal text and legal norm, argues that the fact that art. 145, paragraph 1, of the constitutional text, only expressly provides for the application of the principle of taxable capacity, does not preclude its application to public services tax. It argues that the substantive criteria of justice upheld by the constituent power in 1988 impose the need for fiscal justice, which necessarily means that taxpayers must comply with their ability to pay. Doctrinal understandings on the subject are discussed, as well as the position of the Federal Supreme Court. Finally, it emphasizes that the application of the principle by the legislator, in the institution of the taxes, must observe the peculiarities proper to the tax species. 1 Doutor em Direito pela PUC/SP. Mestre em Direito pela UNICAP. Especialista em Direito Público pela Escola Superior da Magistratura de Pernambuco ESMAPE. Advogado. Professor da Faculdade Sete de Setembro FASETE, em Paulo Afonso BA e da Universidade Católica do Salvador, graduação e do mestrado. Mestrando em Direito Público pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas UFAL. Especialista em Direito Tributário pela UNIDERP. Procurador do Estado de Alagoas. 3 Doutor e mestre em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco UFPE. Procurador do Estado de Alagoas. Advogado. Professor da Faculdade Sete de Setembro FASETE, em Paulo Afonso – BA.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130567020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seção Especial: "Comparative Constitutional Law and Legal Culture: Asia and the Americas": an overview of the CRN01 under the Law and Society Washington, 2019 Meeting 专题:“比较宪法与法律文化:亚洲与美洲”——《法律与社会》第01期研究综述
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190053
F. Duarte, Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Ronaldo Lucas da Silva
{"title":"Seção Especial: \"Comparative Constitutional Law and Legal Culture: Asia and the\u0000 Americas\": an overview of the CRN01 under the Law and Society Washington, 2019\u0000 Meeting","authors":"F. Duarte, Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Ronaldo Lucas da Silva","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125757511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Entre Normas e Práticas: Pesquisa Empírica no Direito em Diálogo com as Ciências Sociais 规范与实践之间:与社会科学对话中的实证法律研究
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210023
Michel Lobo Toledo Lima
This Dossier brings together articles with an emphasis on empirical research, using various methods from the Social Sciences, qualitative and quantitative, including mixed methods - such as ethnography, fieldwork, participant observation, direct observation, contrastive comparison, formal or informal interviews, retrospective longitudinal flow analysis, discourse analysis and analysis of official documents, including with software such as NVIVO, SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The articles also bring critical and reflexive argumentation about the current Brazilian legal system, making explicit its contradictions, its dilemmas, its specificities and its “senses of justice”, especially when contrasting laws, doctrines, and the ideal types of legal dogmatics to judicial and court practices. This dossier also articulates authors who work at several universities, public and private, from various states and regions of Brazil - Pontifícia Mackenzie de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Santa Úrsula and Universidade Veiga de Almeida – who are representative of researchers’ networks on the field of Law in Brazil, some of them well established and consolidated. This publication also shed light upon activities related to the post-doctoral research project FAPERJ nota 10, entitled "Between Norms and Practices: Paradoxes in the Institutional Administration of Criminal Cases in the Brazilian Legal-Police Model in Comparative Perspective". This project, still in progress, is being executed in the Núcleo de Pesquisa em Administração Institucional de Conflitos of the Graduate Program in Law at the Universidade Veiga de Almeida, both linked to the Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração de Conflitos. Far from a single institutional representation, the mentioned post-doctoral research has also aimed, since its beginning, at promoting the dialogue between social sciences and applied social sciences, especially between social sciences and Law, focusing on research that is not only "about" Law, but also carried out “with” Law, notably represented here by its operators and researchers, as authors of the articles of this dossier. It is an effort, among others, to contribute to the construction of a tradition of inter-institutional and interdisciplinary dialogue of research with Law, in which the Juris Poiesis Journal, linked to the Graduate Program in Law at Universidade Estácio de Sá, is a fundamental, consolidated and permanent space for the promotion and dissemination of such empirical work. For this publication, the contributions of 27 authors were received and approved, represented in 16 texts.
该档案汇集了强调实证研究的文章,使用社会科学的各种方法,定性和定量,包括混合方法-如民族志,田野调查,参与观察,直接观察,对比比较,正式或非正式访谈,回顾性纵向流动分析,话语分析和官方文件分析,包括NVIVO, SPSS和Microsoft Excel等软件。这些文章还对巴西现行法律制度进行了批判性和反思性的论证,明确了其矛盾、困境、特殊性和“正义感”,特别是在将法律、理论和法律教条的理想类型与司法和法院实践进行对比时。本档案还阐明了在巴西不同州和地区的几所公立和私立大学工作的作者- Pontifícia Mackenzie de s圣保罗大学,圣保罗大学,Santa大学Úrsula和韦加德阿尔梅达大学-他们是巴西法律领域研究人员网络的代表,其中一些已经建立和巩固。该出版物还阐明了与博士后研究项目FAPERJ nota 10有关的活动,该项目题为“在规范与实践之间:从比较的角度看巴西法律-警察模式中刑事案件机构管理的悖论”。这一项目仍在进行中,目前正在韦加·德·阿尔梅达大学法律研究生方案的Núcleo行政 比较学院和行政比较学院合办的Conflitos研究生课程中执行。上述博士后研究从一开始就不是一个单一的机构代表,而是旨在促进社会科学与应用社会科学之间的对话,特别是社会科学与法律之间的对话,重点是不仅“关于”法律的研究,而且“与”法律进行的研究,特别是由作为本档案文章作者的法律经营者和研究人员代表。这是一项努力,除其他外,有助于建立与法律研究的机构间和跨学科对话的传统,其中与Estácio de sade大学法律研究生课程相关的Juris Poiesis期刊是促进和传播此类实证工作的基础,巩固和永久空间。对于这份出版物,收到并批准了27位作者的贡献,在16个文本中有代表。
{"title":"Entre Normas e Práticas: Pesquisa Empírica no Direito em Diálogo com as Ciências Sociais","authors":"Michel Lobo Toledo Lima","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210023","url":null,"abstract":"This Dossier brings together articles with an emphasis on empirical research, using various methods from the Social Sciences, qualitative and quantitative, including mixed methods - such as ethnography, fieldwork, participant observation, direct observation, contrastive comparison, formal or informal interviews, retrospective longitudinal flow analysis, discourse analysis and analysis of official documents, including with software such as NVIVO, SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The articles also bring critical and reflexive argumentation about the current Brazilian legal system, making explicit its contradictions, its dilemmas, its specificities and its “senses of justice”, especially when contrasting laws, doctrines, and the ideal types of legal dogmatics to judicial and court practices. This dossier also articulates authors who work at several universities, public and private, from various states and regions of Brazil - Pontifícia Mackenzie de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Santa Úrsula and Universidade Veiga de Almeida – who are representative of researchers’ networks on the field of Law in Brazil, some of them well established and consolidated. This publication also shed light upon activities related to the post-doctoral research project FAPERJ nota 10, entitled \"Between Norms and Practices: Paradoxes in the Institutional Administration of Criminal Cases in the Brazilian Legal-Police Model in Comparative Perspective\". This project, still in progress, is being executed in the Núcleo de Pesquisa em Administração Institucional de Conflitos of the Graduate Program in Law at the Universidade Veiga de Almeida, both linked to the Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administração de Conflitos. Far from a single institutional representation, the mentioned post-doctoral research has also aimed, since its beginning, at promoting the dialogue between social sciences and applied social sciences, especially between social sciences and Law, focusing on research that is not only \"about\" Law, but also carried out “with” Law, notably represented here by its operators and researchers, as authors of the articles of this dossier. It is an effort, among others, to contribute to the construction of a tradition of inter-institutional and interdisciplinary dialogue of research with Law, in which the Juris Poiesis Journal, linked to the Graduate Program in Law at Universidade Estácio de Sá, is a fundamental, consolidated and permanent space for the promotion and dissemination of such empirical work. For this publication, the contributions of 27 authors were received and approved, represented in 16 texts.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130242403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
DA DECISÃO AO FATO – DECISÃO DECLARATÓRIA DE NULIDADE DE TESTAMENTO E MODULAÇÃO DE EFEITOS: UM ESTUDO DE CASO À PARTIR DOS JULGADOS RTJ 99 E RJTJRS 68 从裁决到事实--关于遗嘱无效的宣告性裁决和效力调整:基于 RTJ 99 和 RJTJR 68 判决的案例研究
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210006
D. Carvalho, Henrique Perlatto Moura
The judicial decision absorbs the facts described by the lawyers and transforms that into concrete rights. It is, therefore, responsible for the connection of the juridical abstraction with the factual reality. What happens when there is an incompatibility between the juridical effects and the facts experienced? What would happen to the possession of a legatee, that exercised his right to possess holding a will in recurrence of the Saisine, when is confronted with a decision 1 Advogado empresarial. Doutor em Direito Internacional e Comparado pela USP. Professor na Faculdade de Direito Milton Campos. Membro e Coordenador de Grupo na Academia Brasileira de Direito Internacional. Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2643440740481449. 2 Advogado no escritório Ayres Ribeiro; Mestre em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito Milton Campos com Erasmus junto à Universidade de Lisboa; Especialista em Direito Tributário pelo instituto IED e IBET; Autor de artigos acadêmicos e professor universitário. Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0721054953833990.
司法判决吸收律师所描述的事实,并将其转化为具体的权利。因此,它负责将司法抽象与事实现实联系起来。当司法效力与所经历的事实不一致时会发生什么?受遗赠人在行使其持有《赛辛纳》遗嘱的占有权时,如果面临一项裁决,其占有权会发生什么情况?南太平洋大学国际和比较法教授。米尔顿-坎波斯法律系教授。Brasileira de Direito Academia Internacional 小组成员兼协调员。Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2643440740481449.2 Ayres Ribeiro 律师事务所顾问;米尔顿-坎波斯法律系法律硕士,在里斯本大学获得伊拉斯谟学位;IED 研究所和 IBET 研究所的民事法律专家;学术论文作者和大学教授。Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0721054953833990.
{"title":"DA DECISÃO AO FATO – DECISÃO DECLARATÓRIA DE NULIDADE DE TESTAMENTO E MODULAÇÃO DE EFEITOS: UM ESTUDO DE CASO À PARTIR DOS JULGADOS RTJ 99 E RJTJRS 68","authors":"D. Carvalho, Henrique Perlatto Moura","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210006","url":null,"abstract":"The judicial decision absorbs the facts described by the lawyers and transforms that into concrete rights. It is, therefore, responsible for the connection of the juridical abstraction with the factual reality. What happens when there is an incompatibility between the juridical effects and the facts experienced? What would happen to the possession of a legatee, that exercised his right to possess holding a will in recurrence of the Saisine, when is confronted with a decision 1 Advogado empresarial. Doutor em Direito Internacional e Comparado pela USP. Professor na Faculdade de Direito Milton Campos. Membro e Coordenador de Grupo na Academia Brasileira de Direito Internacional. Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2643440740481449. 2 Advogado no escritório Ayres Ribeiro; Mestre em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito Milton Campos com Erasmus junto à Universidade de Lisboa; Especialista em Direito Tributário pelo instituto IED e IBET; Autor de artigos acadêmicos e professor universitário. Currículo lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0721054953833990.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130367214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mediador y facilitador ;El mediador profesional del acuerdo, el facilitador profesional del perdón 调解人和促进者;和解的专业调解人,宽恕的专业促进者
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20190012
Francisco Gorjón-Gómez
This article evidences the confusion that currently exists between a mediator and a facilitator that has caused the mediator to be misnamed in his professional performance, 1 Doctor por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Miembro del Sistema Nacional de investigadores Nivel II, Profesor Investigador de Tiempo Completo de la Facultad de Derecho y Criminología de la UANL, México, Director Académico del Doctorado en Métodos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, presidente de la Asociación Internacional de Doctores en Métodos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos ASID/MASC y del Colegio de Mediadores de Nuevo León. Email: fgorjon@hotmail.com. ORCID ID 0000-0001-5296-6454
这条新混乱,目前对于between mediator及facilitator了the mediator to be misnamed in professional performance, 1个医生马德里康普鲁坦斯大学研究国家二级委员、哈佛法学院(harvard law school)教授全职研究员和犯罪学UANL、墨西哥新埃沃自治大学冲突解决替代方法博士学术主任leon,国际冲突解决替代方法博士协会ASID/MASC主席和新埃沃调解员协会leon主席。电子邮件:fgorjon@hotmail.com。ORCID ID 0000-0001-5296-6454
{"title":"Mediador y facilitador ;El mediador profesional del acuerdo, el facilitador profesional del perdón","authors":"Francisco Gorjón-Gómez","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190012","url":null,"abstract":"This article evidences the confusion that currently exists between a mediator and a facilitator that has caused the mediator to be misnamed in his professional performance, 1 Doctor por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Miembro del Sistema Nacional de investigadores Nivel II, Profesor Investigador de Tiempo Completo de la Facultad de Derecho y Criminología de la UANL, México, Director Académico del Doctorado en Métodos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, presidente de la Asociación Internacional de Doctores en Métodos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos ASID/MASC y del Colegio de Mediadores de Nuevo León. Email: fgorjon@hotmail.com. ORCID ID 0000-0001-5296-6454","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129190466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
HIPÓTESES INCONSTITUCIONAIS NA INCIDÊNCIA DE DIREITOS POLÍTICOS NEGATIVOS AOS MILITARES 对军队负面政治权利的违宪假设
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210014
M. C. Botelho, Gabriel Vieira Terenzi
The present paper aims to analyze the treatment given by the Brazilian legal rule to members of the armed forces, both from the troops and from the officers, in an attempt to answer the following questions: are the provisions that regulate the political participation of the military unconstitutional? If so, at what points, and under what parameters? For that, a deductive methodology had been adopted. In view of the theme, the modalities of the incidence of negative political rights those that limit the exercise of political participation especially to the military will be established, as well as their respective characteristics, reasons and foundations. From these institutes, an assessment of their compatibility with the constitutional text will be carried out. It was consciously chosen to evaluate constitutionality through the positions consolidated by national jurisprudence and academia. Thus, it will not be verified the constitutional adequacy according to theories little received in the national scene, such as that of the unconstitutionality of a rule from the original constituent power. Thus, with the comparison of the established parameters, it concludes by the constitutionality of the impediment to the conscription of the conscript, of the sui generis regime in the candidacy of the officer and of the suspension of the political rights of the one who fails to perform alternative service to the mandatory military service. It concludes, in another round, by the unconstitutionality of prohibiting the conscript already listed from voting, of restricting the candidacy of the convict for military indignity, and of depriving of political rights the one who has not fulfilled alternative service and has exceeded forty-five years of age.
本文旨在分析巴西法律规则对武装部队成员的待遇,包括部队和军官,试图回答以下问题:规范军队政治参与的规定是否违宪?如果是这样,在什么情况下,在什么条件下?为此,采用了演绎法。鉴于这一主题,将确定消极政治权利发生的方式- -那些限制政治参与的行使,特别是限制军事参与的方式- -及其各自的特点、原因和基础。将从这些机构中评估它们是否符合宪法文本。人们有意识地选择通过国家法理学和学术界所巩固的立场来评价合宪性。因此,根据在国家舞台上很少接受的理论,例如来自原始组成权力的规则的违宪性,将无法验证宪法的充分性。因此,通过对既定参数的比较,它得出的结论是,对应征入伍者的征兵设置障碍,对军官候选人的特殊制度,以及对不履行替代义务兵役的人的政治权利的中止是合宪性的。它的结论是,在另一轮中,禁止已列入名单的应征入伍者参加投票,限制因军事侮辱而被定罪的人的候选人资格,以及剥夺未服过替代兵役且已超过45岁的人的政治权利是违宪的。
{"title":"HIPÓTESES INCONSTITUCIONAIS NA INCIDÊNCIA DE DIREITOS POLÍTICOS NEGATIVOS AOS MILITARES","authors":"M. C. Botelho, Gabriel Vieira Terenzi","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210014","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper aims to analyze the treatment given by the Brazilian legal rule to members of the armed forces, both from the troops and from the officers, in an attempt to answer the following questions: are the provisions that regulate the political participation of the military unconstitutional? If so, at what points, and under what parameters? For that, a deductive methodology had been adopted. In view of the theme, the modalities of the incidence of negative political rights those that limit the exercise of political participation especially to the military will be established, as well as their respective characteristics, reasons and foundations. From these institutes, an assessment of their compatibility with the constitutional text will be carried out. It was consciously chosen to evaluate constitutionality through the positions consolidated by national jurisprudence and academia. Thus, it will not be verified the constitutional adequacy according to theories little received in the national scene, such as that of the unconstitutionality of a rule from the original constituent power. Thus, with the comparison of the established parameters, it concludes by the constitutionality of the impediment to the conscription of the conscript, of the sui generis regime in the candidacy of the officer and of the suspension of the political rights of the one who fails to perform alternative service to the mandatory military service. It concludes, in another round, by the unconstitutionality of prohibiting the conscript already listed from voting, of restricting the candidacy of the convict for military indignity, and of depriving of political rights the one who has not fulfilled alternative service and has exceeded forty-five years of age.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130148840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A GENEALOGIA DA IGUALDADE JURÍDICA NA DOGMÁTICA BRASILEIRA
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20210016
M. C. R. Freitas
Equality is an indispensable assumption for so-called democratic societies and a principle that informs the understanding of the human person. It is what gives dignity to man, insofar as equality guarantees, or should guarantee, a homogeneous status for all individuals, without distinction. Therefore, as a measure of different theories of justice, within the framework of the construction of the idea of an individual erected by the Democratic States of Law, equality is an important reference to evaluate the legal and political system of societies. This paper aims to develop a genealogy of Brazilian understanding of legal equality throughout the republican period, formulating a sociological critique. To this end, we will cover the works of eight famous authors who discuss the theme in national dogmatics, identifying generations of thought and the coherence, internal and external, of these thoughts with the Brazilian experience on the theme.
平等是所谓民主社会必不可少的假设,也是理解人的原则。它给人以尊严,因为平等保证,或应该保证,所有个人的同质地位,没有区别。因此,作为衡量不同正义理论的尺度,在民主法治国家所建立的个人理念的构建框架内,平等是评价社会法律和政治制度的重要参考。本文旨在发展整个共和时期巴西人对法律平等理解的谱系,形成社会学批判。为此,我们将介绍八位著名作家的作品,他们在国家教义中讨论了这一主题,确定了几代人的思想以及这些思想在内部和外部的一致性,以及巴西在这一主题上的经验。
{"title":"A GENEALOGIA DA IGUALDADE JURÍDICA NA DOGMÁTICA BRASILEIRA","authors":"M. C. R. Freitas","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20210016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20210016","url":null,"abstract":"Equality is an indispensable assumption for so-called democratic societies and a principle that informs the understanding of the human person. It is what gives dignity to man, insofar as equality guarantees, or should guarantee, a homogeneous status for all individuals, without distinction. Therefore, as a measure of different theories of justice, within the framework of the construction of the idea of an individual erected by the Democratic States of Law, equality is an important reference to evaluate the legal and political system of societies. This paper aims to develop a genealogy of Brazilian understanding of legal equality throughout the republican period, formulating a sociological critique. To this end, we will cover the works of eight famous authors who discuss the theme in national dogmatics, identifying generations of thought and the coherence, internal and external, of these thoughts with the Brazilian experience on the theme.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"10 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130425221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International Legal Cooperation and the Principle of Reciprocity: Lessons from Extradition Law 国际法律合作与互惠原则:引渡法的启示
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20200028
Leticia Fontestad Portalés
{"title":"International Legal Cooperation and the Principle of Reciprocity: Lessons from\u0000 Extradition Law","authors":"Leticia Fontestad Portalés","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20200028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20200028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130440962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International legal cooperation and the principles of recognition and enforcement: lessons from healthcare law 国际法律合作和承认与执行原则:来自保健法的经验教训
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20200031
S. L. Cooper
{"title":"International legal cooperation and the principles of recognition and enforcement:\u0000 lessons from healthcare law","authors":"S. L. Cooper","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20200031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20200031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130494393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Administrative deference and its link with the non-delegation doctrine in the law of the United States 行政服从及其与美国法律中非授权原则的联系
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5935/2448-0517.20200036
I. Gioia
{"title":"Administrative deference and its link with the non-delegation doctrine in the law\u0000 of the United States","authors":"I. Gioia","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20200036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20200036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115608082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Revista Juris Poiesis
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1