{"title":"Deconstructive Criticism: An Advanced Introduction by Vincent B. Leitch (review)","authors":"R. D. Morrison","doi":"10.2307/1347478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1347478","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127594130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La Nouvelle Beatrice: Renaissance and Romance in \"Rappaccini's Daughter\" by Carol Marie Bensick (review)","authors":"K. M. Harris","doi":"10.1353/rmr.1987.0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1987.0050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131073517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Günter de Bruyn's Märkische Forschungen: Form, Institutions, and Censorship","authors":"Rachel J. Halverson","doi":"10.2307/1348329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1348329","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131232435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-06DOI: 10.1353/rmr.1985.a460985
J. Goodenough
{"title":"Thirty Below","authors":"J. Goodenough","doi":"10.1353/rmr.1985.a460985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1985.a460985","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130835578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uncommon Cultures: Popular Culture and Post-Modernism by Jim Collins (review)","authors":"Richard J. Rundell","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1990.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1990.0030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132903465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scholes is the most persuasive contemporary American critic in the field of narrative theory. I use the slightly catachretic "persuasive" because narrative theory has never been as important in the American academy as it is in Europe and Latin America, and readers and scholars still often need to be convinced that our social and cultural approaches to fiction can profitably be supplemented by structuralist and semiological models that Scholes presented so well in his 1 974 Structuralism andLiterature (the title is too general, as fiction is the point of reference). Structural Fabulation performs in the area ofnarrative theory what Kinsley Amis's 1960 New Maps ofHell did for narrative content analysis: provide a reasoned defense of the importance of science fiction. Admittedly Schole's task is easier: while some scholars may continue to disdain SF (and that other pariah; detective fiction), as subliterature, the serious critic of fiction in recent decades must give centrality to how concepts like good vs. bad literature, serious vs. popular writing, fiction vs. non-fiction, crafted vs. sloppy structure have been irreparably shattered bymajor innovators. Science fiction can only by the greatest haughtiness be dismissed as trivial. Scholes supports his case by a felicitous combination of the description of the structural principles of SF narrâtology and the discussion of concrete works, organized around the central, intriguing proposition that "... the most appropriate kind of fiction that can be written in the present and the immediate future is fiction that takes places in future time" (p. 17). DAVID WILLIAM FOSTER*
斯科尔斯是当代美国叙事理论领域最具说服力的批评家。我之所以用“有说服力”这个词，是因为叙事理论在美国学术界从来没有像在欧洲和拉丁美洲那样重要，读者和学者们仍然经常需要相信，我们对小说的社会和文化研究方法可以通过斯科尔斯1974年在他的《结构主义与文学》(Structuralism and literature)一书中提出的结构主义和符号学模型来有益地补充。(这个标题太笼统了，因为小说是参考点)。《结构虚构》在叙事理论领域的表现，就像金斯利·艾米斯(Kinsley Amis) 1960年的《地狱新地图》(New Maps of hell)对叙事内容分析所做的那样:为科幻小说的重要性提供了合理的辩护。诚然，肖尔的任务要简单得多:虽然一些学者可能会继续蔑视科幻小说(以及其他被唾弃的作品);侦探小说)，作为次文学，近几十年来，严肃的小说评论家必须关注诸如好文学与坏文学、严肃文学与通俗文学、小说与非小说、精心设计与草率结构等概念是如何被主要创新者不可挽回地打破的。只有最傲慢的人才会认为科幻小说微不足道。斯科尔斯将科幻小说叙事学的结构原理和具体作品的讨论巧妙地结合起来，围绕着一个有趣的中心命题“……在现在和不久的将来可以写的最合适的小说是发生在未来时间的小说”(第17页)。大卫·威廉·福斯特*
{"title":"Structural Fabulation; An Essay on Fiction of the Future by Robert Scholes (review)","authors":"D. Foster","doi":"10.2307/1347683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1347683","url":null,"abstract":"Scholes is the most persuasive contemporary American critic in the field of narrative theory. I use the slightly catachretic \"persuasive\" because narrative theory has never been as important in the American academy as it is in Europe and Latin America, and readers and scholars still often need to be convinced that our social and cultural approaches to fiction can profitably be supplemented by structuralist and semiological models that Scholes presented so well in his 1 974 Structuralism andLiterature (the title is too general, as fiction is the point of reference). Structural Fabulation performs in the area ofnarrative theory what Kinsley Amis's 1960 New Maps ofHell did for narrative content analysis: provide a reasoned defense of the importance of science fiction. Admittedly Schole's task is easier: while some scholars may continue to disdain SF (and that other pariah; detective fiction), as subliterature, the serious critic of fiction in recent decades must give centrality to how concepts like good vs. bad literature, serious vs. popular writing, fiction vs. non-fiction, crafted vs. sloppy structure have been irreparably shattered bymajor innovators. Science fiction can only by the greatest haughtiness be dismissed as trivial. Scholes supports his case by a felicitous combination of the description of the structural principles of SF narrâtology and the discussion of concrete works, organized around the central, intriguing proposition that \"... the most appropriate kind of fiction that can be written in the present and the immediate future is fiction that takes places in future time\" (p. 17). DAVID WILLIAM FOSTER*","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132923843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter Ramus, born Pierre de la Ramée in 1515, appointed Regius Professor of Eloquence and Philosophy at the University of Paris, murdered by his academic enemies during the St. Bartholomew's Massacre in 1572, was a Renaissance humanist, reformer, and encyclopedist. His biographer, Freigius, claims that for his Master's degree Ramus defended the proposition "Whatever Aristotle has said must be considered fabricated." The topic not only gives testimony to Ramus' intellectual versatility, but it also foreshadows his reputation as an academic enfant terrible. The 300 editions of Dialectic in Latin or French along with over 150 editions of this Rhetoric attest to his enormous influence and popularity (see Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1958). As a humanist reform movement, Ramism prompted a furious debate about curriculum and other educational matters that lasted well into the seventeenth century. Ramist logic was at the center of that debate: virtually every book about dialectic in this period is an attack or defense of Ramist logic. Ramist logic flourished at Cambridge and was the first system taught at Harvard. It is identified with Puritanism, principally through the work of commentators—William Temple, George Downame, Richard Hooker, and Everard Digby. Samuel Eliot Morison and Perry Miller have elaborated Ramus influence on the intellectual life of colonia America, an influence captured in Increase Mather's reference to Ramus as "that Great Scholar and Blessed Martyr." More recently, as interest in Renaissance rhetoric has grown, so has interest in Ramism. Wilbur Samuel Howell's Logic andRhetoric in England, 1500-1700 (Princeton, 1956) is an invaluable study of the period. Walter Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard, 1958), is a particularly resourceful and influential treatment of Ramist ideas. The two volumes under review here are works for the specialist: theymake available majordocuments of the Ramist corpus. Scholae in Liberales Artes (Lectures on the Liberal Arts), the most readable of Ramist works, is a collection of supplements to the textbooks Ramus wrote on the various arts. This volume also contains a set of lectures on Ramus' ideas about teaching policies. The order of this 1596 edition follows that of the curriculum:
彼得·拉莫斯，生于1515年，原名皮埃尔·德·拉·拉姆萨梅，被任命为巴黎大学口才和哲学教授，在1572年的圣巴塞洛缪大屠杀中被他的学术敌人谋杀，他是文艺复兴时期的人文主义者、改革者和百科全书作者。他的传记作者Freigius声称，在他的硕士学位中，Ramus捍卫了“亚里士多德所说的一切都必须被认为是捏造的”这一命题。这个话题不仅证明了拉姆斯的知识广博，也预示了他作为一个学究的坏小子的名声。300个拉丁文或法文版本的《辩证法》以及150多个版本的《修辞学》证明了他巨大的影响力和知名度(见Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory，剑桥，哈佛大学出版社，1958)。作为一场人文主义改革运动，拉美主义引发了一场关于课程和其他教育问题的激烈辩论，这场辩论一直持续到17世纪。拉米斯逻辑是这场辩论的中心:实际上，这一时期每一本关于辩证法的书都是对拉米斯逻辑的攻击或辩护。拉米斯逻辑在剑桥蓬勃发展，是哈佛教授的第一个系统。它被认为是清教主义，主要是通过评论家的工作-威廉·坦普尔，乔治·唐纳，理查德·胡克，和埃弗拉德·迪格比。塞缪尔·艾略特·莫里森(Samuel Eliot morrison)和佩里·米勒(Perry Miller)详细阐述了拉莫斯对美国殖民地知识分子生活的影响，这种影响体现在英克里斯·马瑟(Increase Mather)将拉莫斯称为“伟大的学者和受祝福的烈士”。最近，随着人们对文艺复兴时期修辞学的兴趣日益浓厚，人们对拉美主义也越来越感兴趣。威尔伯·塞缪尔·豪厄尔的《英格兰的逻辑学与修辞学，1500-1700》(普林斯顿大学，1956年)是对这一时期的宝贵研究。Walter Ong的《Ramus, Method, and Decay of Dialogue》(哈佛，1958)是对Ramus思想的一次特别机智和有影响力的论述。这里审查的两卷是专家的作品:它们提供了Ramist语料库的主要文件。《文理讲学》(Scholae in Liberales Artes)是Ramus最易读的作品，是Ramus写的关于各种艺术的教科书的补充集。本卷还包含了一套讲座Ramus的思想关于教学政策。1596年版的顺序遵循课程的顺序:
{"title":"Scholae in Liberales by Petrus Ramus, and: Colectaneae Praefationes, Epistolae, Orationes by Petrus Ramus and Audomarus Talaeus (review)","authors":"James Shay","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1980.0042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1980.0042","url":null,"abstract":"Peter Ramus, born Pierre de la Ramée in 1515, appointed Regius Professor of Eloquence and Philosophy at the University of Paris, murdered by his academic enemies during the St. Bartholomew's Massacre in 1572, was a Renaissance humanist, reformer, and encyclopedist. His biographer, Freigius, claims that for his Master's degree Ramus defended the proposition \"Whatever Aristotle has said must be considered fabricated.\" The topic not only gives testimony to Ramus' intellectual versatility, but it also foreshadows his reputation as an academic enfant terrible. The 300 editions of Dialectic in Latin or French along with over 150 editions of this Rhetoric attest to his enormous influence and popularity (see Walter J. Ong, Ramus and Talon inventory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1958). As a humanist reform movement, Ramism prompted a furious debate about curriculum and other educational matters that lasted well into the seventeenth century. Ramist logic was at the center of that debate: virtually every book about dialectic in this period is an attack or defense of Ramist logic. Ramist logic flourished at Cambridge and was the first system taught at Harvard. It is identified with Puritanism, principally through the work of commentators—William Temple, George Downame, Richard Hooker, and Everard Digby. Samuel Eliot Morison and Perry Miller have elaborated Ramus influence on the intellectual life of colonia America, an influence captured in Increase Mather's reference to Ramus as \"that Great Scholar and Blessed Martyr.\" More recently, as interest in Renaissance rhetoric has grown, so has interest in Ramism. Wilbur Samuel Howell's Logic andRhetoric in England, 1500-1700 (Princeton, 1956) is an invaluable study of the period. Walter Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Harvard, 1958), is a particularly resourceful and influential treatment of Ramist ideas. The two volumes under review here are works for the specialist: theymake available majordocuments of the Ramist corpus. Scholae in Liberales Artes (Lectures on the Liberal Arts), the most readable of Ramist works, is a collection of supplements to the textbooks Ramus wrote on the various arts. This volume also contains a set of lectures on Ramus' ideas about teaching policies. The order of this 1596 edition follows that of the curriculum:","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133373730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"If You Miss the Sign for Davlia","authors":"David S. Faldet","doi":"10.2307/1348309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1348309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133610666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Word Ways: The Novels of D'Arcy McNickle by John Lloyd Purdy (review)","authors":"James Ruppert","doi":"10.1353/rmr.1990.0027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1990.0027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133615157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Alexander Pope by Laura Brown (review)","authors":"P. Thorpe","doi":"10.1353/rmr.1986.0059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1986.0059","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133416299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：