Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.5747/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h537
Daniel Novaes
This article discusses the resolution of a mathematics exercise of the large-scale evaluation of the More Literacy Program, performed by a student with autism in collaboration with the regular teacher and the intern. It starts from the problematic of educational policies that advocate education for all but culminates in the standardization of developmental assessment due to the initial diagnosis of disability. The study is based on the cultural-historical theory of human development, whose understanding of disability is not in what the subject lacks, but in the possibilities arising from the socio-historical-cultural environment. The investigations took place during the 2019 school year in a municipal school of basic education, in the second year of primary schools, with an 8-year-old student diagnosed with autism, with the fictitious name Miguel. The cut brought is from an exercise of the official evaluation of the Program, performed by the student in collaboration with the teacher and the intern. Classroom situations were analyzed in the light of the microgenetic approach of cultural-historical nature, recorded through photography and field diary. The results point to the resolution of the evaluative task in collaboration, which allowed the student with autism to participate in the task that was common to all in the room. They also revealed the need to think of a more democratic and collaborative school. In the final considerations, some indicators of the student's development are listed with focus on discussions about the man and the social function of the school present in the cultural-historical theory.
{"title":"REFLEXÕES SOBRE A AVALIAÇÃO DE MATEMÁTICA DO PROGRAMA MAIS ALFABETIZAÇÃO REALIZADA POR UM ALUNO COM AUTISMO DO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL","authors":"Daniel Novaes","doi":"10.5747/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5747/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h537","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the resolution of a mathematics exercise of the large-scale evaluation of the More Literacy Program, performed by a student with autism in collaboration with the regular teacher and the intern. It starts from the problematic of educational policies that advocate education for all but culminates in the standardization of developmental assessment due to the initial diagnosis of disability. The study is based on the cultural-historical theory of human development, whose understanding of disability is not in what the subject lacks, but in the possibilities arising from the socio-historical-cultural environment. The investigations took place during the 2019 school year in a municipal school of basic education, in the second year of primary schools, with an 8-year-old student diagnosed with autism, with the fictitious name Miguel. The cut brought is from an exercise of the official evaluation of the Program, performed by the student in collaboration with the teacher and the intern. Classroom situations were analyzed in the light of the microgenetic approach of cultural-historical nature, recorded through photography and field diary. The results point to the resolution of the evaluative task in collaboration, which allowed the student with autism to participate in the task that was common to all in the room. They also revealed the need to think of a more democratic and collaborative school. In the final considerations, some indicators of the student's development are listed with focus on discussions about the man and the social function of the school present in the cultural-historical theory.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42218292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-19DOI: 10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h535
Ana Luzia Videira Parisotto, Clara Sanches Sebastião
The present article brings some results of a scientific research (Fapesp/Process 2021/06003-8), which investigated the limits and potentialities of the textual correction marks left by teachers in texts productions of fourth and fifth grades of Elementary School. We delimited for this piece only the analysis of data related to the marks of correction in texts produced by students of the fifth grade of Elementary School. In this way, we aimed to verify the teacher correction marks in fifth grade students' texts, describe and analyze the types of textual correction identified in the corpus in the light of Serafini's (1995) and Ruiz's (2020) studies, and reflect on the potential contributions to text review that go beyond the orthographic-grammatical dimension. This investigation is characterized as qualitative research (GODOY, 1995), with a descriptive-analytical focus (MARTINS, 2008) on aspects related to the correction and evaluation of twenty written productions from the FPPEEBS Research Group writing bank. That said, the results indicate that depending on the type of correction that the teacher takes as a tool to mark the student's text, he can, by means of a dialogical interaction, of the teacher-reader and student-author, guide to a next stage in the process of textual production, the rewriting, stimulating the autonomy and active action of the student; on the other side, he can suppress the interactive character of the text taking the correction as a monologue, a sanitizing practice, of "hunting mistakes", and thus restrict the student's action.
{"title":"AS MARCAS DE CORREÇÃO TEXTUAL: ANÁLISE DE PRODUÇÕES TEXTUAIS CORRIGIDAS POR PROFESSORES DE QUINTOS ANOS DO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL","authors":"Ana Luzia Videira Parisotto, Clara Sanches Sebastião","doi":"10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h535","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h535","url":null,"abstract":"The present article brings some results of a scientific research (Fapesp/Process 2021/06003-8), which investigated the limits and potentialities of the textual correction marks left by teachers in texts productions of fourth and fifth grades of Elementary School. We delimited for this piece only the analysis of data related to the marks of correction in texts produced by students of the fifth grade of Elementary School. In this way, we aimed to verify the teacher correction marks in fifth grade students' texts, describe and analyze the types of textual correction identified in the corpus in the light of Serafini's (1995) and Ruiz's (2020) studies, and reflect on the potential contributions to text review that go beyond the orthographic-grammatical dimension. This investigation is characterized as qualitative research (GODOY, 1995), with a descriptive-analytical focus (MARTINS, 2008) on aspects related to the correction and evaluation of twenty written productions from the FPPEEBS Research Group writing bank. That said, the results indicate that depending on the type of correction that the teacher takes as a tool to mark the student's text, he can, by means of a dialogical interaction, of the teacher-reader and student-author, guide to a next stage in the process of textual production, the rewriting, stimulating the autonomy and active action of the student; on the other side, he can suppress the interactive character of the text taking the correction as a monologue, a sanitizing practice, of \"hunting mistakes\", and thus restrict the student's action.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47405453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-17DOI: 10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h534
Luciane Batista Teixeira, Carla Ledi Korndörfer, Patrícia Cunha Gonzaga Silva, J. A. Aragão, M. Cruz, Márcia Percília Moura Parente, Antônia Carla de Jesus Oliveira, L. S. Figueirêdo
This work sought to investigate how the teaching of Sciences in Rural Education was constituted within the scope of the Escola Família Agrícola (EFA) project, through the instruments of the Pedagogy of Alternation. The EFA is located in the municipality of São Lourenço do Piauí and operates on an alternating basis, students spend 15 days at school and 15 days in the community where they live, a routine that is inspired by the guiding principles of the Pedagogy of Alternation. As for the methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach was developed, also counting on the documentary and ethnographic method. Materials were consulted, including official documents that contribute to the understanding of the functioning of the EFA. In the field data collection, a version was used as a basic instrument for the Scientific Literacy Test (TACB), applied to students. For the monitors, in addition to the TACB, a semi-structured form was used to outline their profile. The results revealed that, of the 38 students in the 3rd year of the Integrated High School Technical Course in Agriculture and Animal Science, only 11 (28,9%) could be considered scientifically literate, while 27 (71,1%) didn´t reach the minimum number of hits in the three axes. The research carried out in this work indicated that the students´ results were unsatisfactory in relation to the Simplified Basic Scientific Literacy (TACB-S), which implies the quality of science teaching in this EFA.
{"title":"EDUCAÇÃO DO CAMPO: ALFABETIZAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA E A PEDAGOGIA DA ALTERNÂNCIA EM UMA ESCOLA FAMÍLIA AGRÍCOLA","authors":"Luciane Batista Teixeira, Carla Ledi Korndörfer, Patrícia Cunha Gonzaga Silva, J. A. Aragão, M. Cruz, Márcia Percília Moura Parente, Antônia Carla de Jesus Oliveira, L. S. Figueirêdo","doi":"10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h534","url":null,"abstract":"This work sought to investigate how the teaching of Sciences in Rural Education was constituted within the scope of the Escola Família Agrícola (EFA) project, through the instruments of the Pedagogy of Alternation. The EFA is located in the municipality of São Lourenço do Piauí and operates on an alternating basis, students spend 15 days at school and 15 days in the community where they live, a routine that is inspired by the guiding principles of the Pedagogy of Alternation. As for the methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach was developed, also counting on the documentary and ethnographic method. Materials were consulted, including official documents that contribute to the understanding of the functioning of the EFA. In the field data collection, a version was used as a basic instrument for the Scientific Literacy Test (TACB), applied to students. For the monitors, in addition to the TACB, a semi-structured form was used to outline their profile. The results revealed that, of the 38 students in the 3rd year of the Integrated High School Technical Course in Agriculture and Animal Science, only 11 (28,9%) could be considered scientifically literate, while 27 (71,1%) didn´t reach the minimum number of hits in the three axes. The research carried out in this work indicated that the students´ results were unsatisfactory in relation to the Simplified Basic Scientific Literacy (TACB-S), which implies the quality of science teaching in this EFA.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44443954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-17DOI: 10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h533
V. Gomes, Claudia Pereira de Pádua Sabia
The present study aims to identify the infrastructure conditions presented in state public schools in the municipality of Marília to receive the implementation of the High School Reform (EM), Law N. 13415/2017, Evidencing the important of evaluation beyond the standardized tests, with discussions about the contextual factors of schools that need to be considered in the search for quality. The research was developed in a documentary and bibliographic nature, with the support of the PIBIC scholarship UNESP´s Rectoty. As a result, we identified that although the regulations of the Reform contemplate the need to improve the infrastructure, its implementation, which began in 2021, is taking place with the existing structural conditions. According to the infrastructure scale proposed by Soares et al. (2013) organized into four levels of classification, we found that all 18 schools that offer the EM in this municipality are classified as basic infrastructure for their operation. Only five schools have a Science Laboratory, two schools have a Library and the other Reading Rooms. We also highlight that seven of the 18 schools investigated were selected by the “Programa Escola + Bonita” (SÃO PAULO, 2019) because they have a greater need for investment in infrastructure. We emphasize that changing the curricular organization as the Reform of the EM proposes without the availability of objective working conditions is not enough for the advancement of quality, at the same time it does not provide a human and emancipatory training for young people. Keywords: School infrastructure; High school reform; Marilia's high school; State public schools.
本研究旨在确定Marília市公立学校为实施第13415/2017号法律《高中改革》(EM)所呈现的基础设施条件,该法律证明了标准化测试之外的评估的重要性,并讨论了在寻求质量时需要考虑的学校背景因素。在PIBIC奖学金UNESP的Rectoty的支持下,这项研究是以文献和书目的形式进行的。因此,我们发现,尽管改革规定考虑到改善基础设施的必要性,但从2021年开始实施的改革是在现有结构条件下进行的。根据Soares等人(2013)提出的基础设施规模分为四个等级分类,我们发现该市所有18所提供EM的学校都被归类为基础设施。只有五所学校有科学实验室,两所学校有图书馆和其他阅览室。我们还强调,在被调查的18所学校中,有7所被“项目教育+博尼塔”(SÃO PAULO, 2019)选中,因为它们对基础设施投资的需求更大。我们强调,在没有客观工作条件的情况下,改革课程组织不足以提高教学质量,同时也不能为年轻人提供人性化和解放性的培训。关键词:学校基础设施;高中改革;玛丽莉亚的高中;公立学校。
{"title":"AVALIAÇÃO DA INFRAESTRUTURA DAS ESCOLAS PÚBLICAS DE ENSINO MÉDIO DO\u0000MUNICÍPIO DE MARÍLIA COMO SUBSÍDIOS PARA A IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA\u0000LEI 13.415/2017","authors":"V. Gomes, Claudia Pereira de Pádua Sabia","doi":"10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2022.v19.h533","url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to identify the infrastructure conditions presented in state public schools in the municipality of Marília to receive the implementation of the High School Reform (EM), Law N. 13415/2017, Evidencing the important of evaluation beyond the standardized tests, with discussions about the contextual factors of schools that need to be considered in the search for quality. The research was developed in a documentary and bibliographic nature, with the support of the PIBIC scholarship UNESP´s Rectoty. As a result, we identified that although the regulations of the Reform contemplate the need to improve the infrastructure, its implementation, which began in 2021, is taking place with the existing structural conditions. According to the infrastructure scale proposed by Soares et al. (2013) organized into four levels of classification, we found that all 18 schools that offer the EM in this municipality are classified as basic infrastructure for their operation. Only five schools have a Science Laboratory, two schools have a Library and the other Reading Rooms. We also highlight that seven of the 18 schools investigated were selected by the “Programa Escola + Bonita” (SÃO PAULO, 2019) because they have a greater need for investment in infrastructure. We emphasize that changing the curricular organization as the Reform of the EM proposes without the availability of objective working conditions is not enough for the advancement of quality, at the same time it does not provide a human and emancipatory training for young people.\u0000Keywords: School infrastructure; High school reform; Marilia's high school; State public schools.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46092968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}