Pub Date : 2021-12-25DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-4-388-397
A. G. Bykova, I. V. Kiselev
The article discusses the formation of legislation on higher education in Russia. The sphere of education is the most important condition for the spiritual, professional formation and development of the individual, the social well-being of society, political and economic formation of the state. An analysis of the historical and legal experience of regulating public relations is a prerequisite for building modern legislation in the field of education. The relevance of the study of the Russian features of legislation on higher education of the XVII-XVIII centuries is that modern social relations in the field of education are not fully regulated. This is evidenced by a range of legal problems. Particular attention should be paid to the legislative regulation of certain powers of participants in public relations in the field of higher education, by-law legal regulation, as well as the implementation of certain legal norms of the Federal Law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ. The need to resolve these problems updates the relevance of theoretical problems. The answer to the above questions is an analysis of the historical foundations of Russian legislation on higher education. In the pre-revolutionary Russia, sufficient experience in managing higher education, as well as regulating relevant social relations was in place. The completeness of the study of the subject of public relations in the field of education in the historical context is closely related to the analysis of the activities of Russian universities. The article considers the reasons for the appearance of educational institutions in Russia. The first domestic educational institutions appeared at the end of the 18th century - at a historical moment when the expansion of Western European ideas for organizing university education reached the Russian state. Russia had an urgent need to train specialists in the field of public administration - officials, theologians - to strengthen the Orthodox faith, teachers - to educate and promote morality. The authorization of the first regulatory and legal sources in the field of higher education was associated with attempts to create the Slavic-Greek-Latin Academy in Moscow. The revival of the ideas of education in Russia objec'tively accelerated the process of creating domestic educational institutions. The further development of legislation on higher education is associated with the implementation of new ideas about the establishment of universities under Empress Elizabeth Petrovna and Catherine the Great . In the final part of the work, it is noted that in connection with the creation of the first educational institution in Russia, the first normative legal act regulating legal relations in the field of higher education is published - "Privilege for the Academy." During the XVII-XVIII centuries Russian legislation on higher education contained personal regulatory legal acts. They were strictly targeted and regulated the activities of the educational institution,
{"title":"Features of Formation of Russian Legislation on Higher Education of the XVII-XVIII Centuries","authors":"A. G. Bykova, I. V. Kiselev","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-4-388-397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-4-388-397","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the formation of legislation on higher education in Russia. The sphere of education is the most important condition for the spiritual, professional formation and development of the individual, the social well-being of society, political and economic formation of the state. An analysis of the historical and legal experience of regulating public relations is a prerequisite for building modern legislation in the field of education. The relevance of the study of the Russian features of legislation on higher education of the XVII-XVIII centuries is that modern social relations in the field of education are not fully regulated. This is evidenced by a range of legal problems. Particular attention should be paid to the legislative regulation of certain powers of participants in public relations in the field of higher education, by-law legal regulation, as well as the implementation of certain legal norms of the Federal Law of 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ. The need to resolve these problems updates the relevance of theoretical problems. The answer to the above questions is an analysis of the historical foundations of Russian legislation on higher education. In the pre-revolutionary Russia, sufficient experience in managing higher education, as well as regulating relevant social relations was in place. The completeness of the study of the subject of public relations in the field of education in the historical context is closely related to the analysis of the activities of Russian universities. The article considers the reasons for the appearance of educational institutions in Russia. The first domestic educational institutions appeared at the end of the 18th century - at a historical moment when the expansion of Western European ideas for organizing university education reached the Russian state. Russia had an urgent need to train specialists in the field of public administration - officials, theologians - to strengthen the Orthodox faith, teachers - to educate and promote morality. The authorization of the first regulatory and legal sources in the field of higher education was associated with attempts to create the Slavic-Greek-Latin Academy in Moscow. The revival of the ideas of education in Russia objec'tively accelerated the process of creating domestic educational institutions. The further development of legislation on higher education is associated with the implementation of new ideas about the establishment of universities under Empress Elizabeth Petrovna and Catherine the Great . In the final part of the work, it is noted that in connection with the creation of the first educational institution in Russia, the first normative legal act regulating legal relations in the field of higher education is published - \"Privilege for the Academy.\" During the XVII-XVIII centuries Russian legislation on higher education contained personal regulatory legal acts. They were strictly targeted and regulated the activities of the educational institution,","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41477901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-339-349
N. V. Landerson
The article considers some features of the integrative relationship between public administration and courts in two types of administrative-tort cases: 1) in cases of administrative offences (or otherwise - in cases of administrative-punishable torts, since the consideration and resolution of this category of administrative-tort cases essentially entails the appointment of administrative penalties according to the rules provided for by Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences); 2) in cases of violations of mandatory requirements detected and suppressed by public administration bodies during control and supervisory proceedings (or otherwise - in cases of administrativeavoidable violations, since the consideration and resolution of this category is administrative-tort cases on the merits entail the application of such a measure of administrative enforcement and restorative influence as the introduction of an order to eliminate violations of mandatory requirements under the rules provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation: 1) add Article 28.8 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences, providing that when drawing up a protocol on an administrative offense, the consideration of which is attributed to the competence of another body, a decision is made on the transfer of the case materials by authority (if the case is subject to consideration by a public administration body) or by jurisdiction (if the case is subject to consideration in a court of general jurisdiction); 2) as an alternative option for further improvement of the administrative-procedural legislation of the Russian Federation, the issue of applying a single algorithm of procedural actions of public administration bodies when sending materials of administrative-punishable cases to the court by filing an application with a requirement to bring to administrative responsibility, as already provided for in Chapter 25 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences, is proposed for discussion among scientists and legislators. And if it is necessary to transfer the materials of an administratively punishable case for consideration from one public administration body to another non-judicial body (public administration body), it is possible to provide for a ruling on the transfer of the case materials for consideration; 3) to regulate in the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences in the form of an independent chapter “Proceedings in administrative cases on the cancellation of a license and (or) permit” and provide for a single procedure for the review and resolution by the court of administrative cases of this category on administrative claims of public administration bodies.
{"title":"On the Integrative Interconnection of Extrajudicial and Judicial Resolution of Administrative-Tort Cases","authors":"N. V. Landerson","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-339-349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-339-349","url":null,"abstract":"The article considers some features of the integrative relationship between public administration and courts in two types of administrative-tort cases: 1) in cases of administrative offences (or otherwise - in cases of administrative-punishable torts, since the consideration and resolution of this category of administrative-tort cases essentially entails the appointment of administrative penalties according to the rules provided for by Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences); 2) in cases of violations of mandatory requirements detected and suppressed by public administration bodies during control and supervisory proceedings (or otherwise - in cases of administrativeavoidable violations, since the consideration and resolution of this category is administrative-tort cases on the merits entail the application of such a measure of administrative enforcement and restorative influence as the introduction of an order to eliminate violations of mandatory requirements under the rules provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation: 1) add Article 28.8 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences, providing that when drawing up a protocol on an administrative offense, the consideration of which is attributed to the competence of another body, a decision is made on the transfer of the case materials by authority (if the case is subject to consideration by a public administration body) or by jurisdiction (if the case is subject to consideration in a court of general jurisdiction); 2) as an alternative option for further improvement of the administrative-procedural legislation of the Russian Federation, the issue of applying a single algorithm of procedural actions of public administration bodies when sending materials of administrative-punishable cases to the court by filing an application with a requirement to bring to administrative responsibility, as already provided for in Chapter 25 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences, is proposed for discussion among scientists and legislators. And if it is necessary to transfer the materials of an administratively punishable case for consideration from one public administration body to another non-judicial body (public administration body), it is possible to provide for a ruling on the transfer of the case materials for consideration; 3) to regulate in the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences in the form of an independent chapter “Proceedings in administrative cases on the cancellation of a license and (or) permit” and provide for a single procedure for the review and resolution by the court of administrative cases of this category on administrative claims of public administration bodies.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45100108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-359-378
Yury P. Solovey
A discussion that has been going on for decades in the Russian legal doctrine about the understanding of the administrative process, according to one of its most active participants, Professor Yu. N. Starilov – a supporter of the judicial interpretation of the administrative process, has lost its meaning today and only hinders the adoption of overdue legal decisions. From the point of view of the named specialist, the legislator must put an end to this discussion by forcing legal scholars and practitioners to use the “correct” terms. In this regard, as the purpose of the presented research the Author has chosen to clarify the issue of the existence of legal grounds for a clear and unambiguous understanding of the administrative process, to determine the content of this legal concept. The subject of the research is legal norms and judicial acts, which use “administrative-procedural” terminology. The hypothesis of the research is that at present there are necessary and sufficient legal grounds to complete the discussion in the legal doctrine on the understanding of the administrative process. To prove the hypothesis and formulate the conclusions of the study, dialectical, formal-logical, formal-legal, comparative legal methods of cognition, the method of interpreting law, and analysis of materials of judicial practice are used. The study makes it possible to conclude that the current domestic legislation provides for the necessary and sufficient legal basis for understanding the Russian administrative process as a legal concept, meaningfully consisting of three parts: a) administrative judicial proceedings; b) proceedings on cases of administrative offenses; c) administrative process (administrative procedures). Hence, the scientific discussion about the understanding of the Russian administrative process, first of all, about the content of this legal concept, should be considered complete in the Author’s opinion. As one of the results of the study, the Author also notes the dualistic nature of the administrative process, given to it by Russian legislation and expressed in the existence of administrative judicial proceedings (carried out by a court) and an administrative out-of-court process (carried out by the public administration). This circumstance must certainly be taken into account when developing future administrative procedural legislative decisions. At the same time, the doctrinal recognition of the status of administrative procedural for the relevant activities of the public administration, to a much greater extent than the qualification of such activities as administrative and procedural, advocated by the followers of the judicial concept of administrative process, will contribute to the implementation of the idea of protection in the federal law on administrative proceedings (administrative procedures) being drafted of human and civil rights in relations with public administration and, in general, ensuring an appropriate level of proce
{"title":"Ending the Discussion on the Understanding of the Administrative Process","authors":"Yury P. Solovey","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-359-378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-359-378","url":null,"abstract":"A discussion that has been going on for decades in the Russian legal doctrine about the understanding of the administrative process, according to one of its most active participants, Professor Yu. N. Starilov – a supporter of the judicial interpretation of the administrative process, has lost its meaning today and only hinders the adoption of overdue legal decisions. From the point of view of the named specialist, the legislator must put an end to this discussion by forcing legal scholars and practitioners to use the “correct” terms. In this regard, as the purpose of the presented research the Author has chosen to clarify the issue of the existence of legal grounds for a clear and unambiguous understanding of the administrative process, to determine the content of this legal concept. The subject of the research is legal norms and judicial acts, which use “administrative-procedural” terminology. The hypothesis of the research is that at present there are necessary and sufficient legal grounds to complete the discussion in the legal doctrine on the understanding of the administrative process. To prove the hypothesis and formulate the conclusions of the study, dialectical, formal-logical, formal-legal, comparative legal methods of cognition, the method of interpreting law, and analysis of materials of judicial practice are used. The study makes it possible to conclude that the current domestic legislation provides for the necessary and sufficient legal basis for understanding the Russian administrative process as a legal concept, meaningfully consisting of three parts: a) administrative judicial proceedings; b) proceedings on cases of administrative offenses; c) administrative process (administrative procedures). Hence, the scientific discussion about the understanding of the Russian administrative process, first of all, about the content of this legal concept, should be considered complete in the Author’s opinion. As one of the results of the study, the Author also notes the dualistic nature of the administrative process, given to it by Russian legislation and expressed in the existence of administrative judicial proceedings (carried out by a court) and an administrative out-of-court process (carried out by the public administration). This circumstance must certainly be taken into account when developing future administrative procedural legislative decisions. At the same time, the doctrinal recognition of the status of administrative procedural for the relevant activities of the public administration, to a much greater extent than the qualification of such activities as administrative and procedural, advocated by the followers of the judicial concept of administrative process, will contribute to the implementation of the idea of protection in the federal law on administrative proceedings (administrative procedures) being drafted of human and civil rights in relations with public administration and, in general, ensuring an appropriate level of proce","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44818405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-261-276
A. Kaplunov
The article provides an overview and analysis of modern approaches to understanding the administrative process as a sectoral type of legal process that have developed in domestic theory, taking into account the changes that have occurred in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation over the past three decades after the collapse of the USSR in 1991. The process is classified as follows: complex on a jurisdictional basis; integrative; complex on the basis of managerial, judicial. Particular attention is paid to the critical analysis of the judicial approach to understanding the administrative process, the reasons for the disagreements of its supporters, firstly, with representatives of the science of civil procedural law regarding the determination of the procedural nature of administrative proceedings, and, secondly, with specialists in administrative law regarding the denial of the presence of administrative-procedural forms of activity of subjects of public administration and attempts thereby to disavow the domestic doctrine of the administrative process. The methodology for studying the nature of procedural activity is based on the analysis of the sectoral subject of legal regulation and three types of a unified method of substantive regulation (civil, administrative and criminal), the implementation channels of which are varieties of legal process in the form of civil, administrative and criminal process which are based on an adversarial or investigative type of jurisdictional process, or a law-granting type of legal process. This methodological approach made it possible: 1) to establish the sectoral procedural nature of administrative proceedings, which is determined not by the subject of a “dispute about law”, but by the method of legal regulation, represented by the civil law type of regulation of public relations, the implementation channel of which is an adversarial type of jurisdictional legal process, which is its nature as a civil process; 2) to identify the shortcomings of the model of administrative proceedings enshrined in Russian legislation, the essence of which is that an adversarial type of jurisdictional process intended for judicial protection of a person who has suffered from the actions of an official and, acting as a plaintiff in the case, is applied to persons who have violated the established prohibitions and restrictions, or committed administrative offenses and acting in the case as a defendant; 3) to substantiate the presence in the structure of the administrative process of procedural forms of activity of subjects of public administration as a channel for the implementation of the administrative-legal type of regulation of public relations and determine the list of administrative proceedings.
{"title":"Modern Approaches to Understanding the Administrative Process as a Result and the Basis for the Development of Domestic Administrative Procedural Legislation","authors":"A. Kaplunov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-261-276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-261-276","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an overview and analysis of modern approaches to understanding the administrative process as a sectoral type of legal process that have developed in domestic theory, taking into account the changes that have occurred in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation over the past three decades after the collapse of the USSR in 1991. The process is classified as follows: complex on a jurisdictional basis; integrative; complex on the basis of managerial, judicial. Particular attention is paid to the critical analysis of the judicial approach to understanding the administrative process, the reasons for the disagreements of its supporters, firstly, with representatives of the science of civil procedural law regarding the determination of the procedural nature of administrative proceedings, and, secondly, with specialists in administrative law regarding the denial of the presence of administrative-procedural forms of activity of subjects of public administration and attempts thereby to disavow the domestic doctrine of the administrative process. The methodology for studying the nature of procedural activity is based on the analysis of the sectoral subject of legal regulation and three types of a unified method of substantive regulation (civil, administrative and criminal), the implementation channels of which are varieties of legal process in the form of civil, administrative and criminal process which are based on an adversarial or investigative type of jurisdictional process, or a law-granting type of legal process. This methodological approach made it possible: 1) to establish the sectoral procedural nature of administrative proceedings, which is determined not by the subject of a “dispute about law”, but by the method of legal regulation, represented by the civil law type of regulation of public relations, the implementation channel of which is an adversarial type of jurisdictional legal process, which is its nature as a civil process; 2) to identify the shortcomings of the model of administrative proceedings enshrined in Russian legislation, the essence of which is that an adversarial type of jurisdictional process intended for judicial protection of a person who has suffered from the actions of an official and, acting as a plaintiff in the case, is applied to persons who have violated the established prohibitions and restrictions, or committed administrative offenses and acting in the case as a defendant; 3) to substantiate the presence in the structure of the administrative process of procedural forms of activity of subjects of public administration as a channel for the implementation of the administrative-legal type of regulation of public relations and determine the list of administrative proceedings.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47425690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-252-260
M. Kobzar-Frolova
Research topics related to concepts such as “process”, “procedures”, “administrative process” remain the most controversial, and, therefore, relevant. Unfortunately, not many scientists are ready to take part in the creation of a modern theory of the administrative process, the development of unified approaches to its terminology, the formation of a unified Russian model of the administrative process. At the same time, knowledge of the works of recognized classics of Russian procedural law is very important and timely. This article attempts to analyze individual works of the classics of Russian administrative procedural law, who stood at the origins of its creation, to compare their position and draw their own conclusions. The excerpts are given and the positions on the subject and essence of the concepts o process, procedure, stages of such scientists as B. M. Lazarev, V. D. Sorokin, N. G. Salishcheva and some others are demonstrated. The purpose of the work was to prove that the ideas of the scientists who stood at the origins of the Russian administrative procedural law are not only alive, they are relevant and should be relied on in order to: 1) develop unified approaches to the terminology of the administrative process, 2) create a unified modern model of the administrative process. The tasks correspond to the purpose of the study and are aimed at understanding the works of recognized classics of Russian procedural law, popularizing their works, ideas, developments, etc. and highlight the signs of the concepts under study. The applied methods made it possible to individualize the essence of the approaches of the classics of Russian administrative procedural law to the concepts of “process”, “procedure”, “administrative process”, develop their own position, give an author's definition and draw other conclusions corresponding to the study.
{"title":"Categories “Process” and “Procedures” in the Works of the Classics of Russian Administrative Law: Concept, Relevance and Modernity of the Model","authors":"M. Kobzar-Frolova","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-252-260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-252-260","url":null,"abstract":"Research topics related to concepts such as “process”, “procedures”, “administrative process” remain the most controversial, and, therefore, relevant. Unfortunately, not many scientists are ready to take part in the creation of a modern theory of the administrative process, the development of unified approaches to its terminology, the formation of a unified Russian model of the administrative process. At the same time, knowledge of the works of recognized classics of Russian procedural law is very important and timely. This article attempts to analyze individual works of the classics of Russian administrative procedural law, who stood at the origins of its creation, to compare their position and draw their own conclusions. The excerpts are given and the positions on the subject and essence of the concepts o process, procedure, stages of such scientists as B. M. Lazarev, V. D. Sorokin, N. G. Salishcheva and some others are demonstrated. The purpose of the work was to prove that the ideas of the scientists who stood at the origins of the Russian administrative procedural law are not only alive, they are relevant and should be relied on in order to: 1) develop unified approaches to the terminology of the administrative process, 2) create a unified modern model of the administrative process. The tasks correspond to the purpose of the study and are aimed at understanding the works of recognized classics of Russian procedural law, popularizing their works, ideas, developments, etc. and highlight the signs of the concepts under study. The applied methods made it possible to individualize the essence of the approaches of the classics of Russian administrative procedural law to the concepts of “process”, “procedure”, “administrative process”, develop their own position, give an author's definition and draw other conclusions corresponding to the study.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49581182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-292-300
V. Zyuzin
At present, in connection with the constitutional reform carried out in the Russian Federation, the process of reconciliation of the basic categories of administrative law with the Constitution is actively underway. In parallel, in the scientific community of specialists in administrative law and process, there has long been a request for the harmonization of views and concepts for the formation of modern administrative procedural legislation. Such a serious scientific task can be successfully solved only by relying on the letter and spirit of the country's fundamental law as the only indisputable starting point for doctrinal provisions. The catalyst for many years of discussion about the boundaries and essence of the administrative process was the adoption in 2015 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation. After the enactment of this code in scientific circulation, the categories of “judicial administrative law” and “judicial administrative process” are actively used, which brings the domestic doctrine closer to the theory of developed foreign countries. However, even in the absence of a law in Russia that defines the legal foundations of an extrajudicial administrative process, one should not forget that the majority of modern representatives of science recognize the existence of an extrajudicial administrative process in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the widest range of administrative cases - about the activities of administrative-public bodies to resolve administrative matters under their jurisdiction, both of a regulatory and protective nature, controversial and indisputable. In this situation, we believe that it is required to conduct a scientific analysis of the terminology used in Russia to study the essence of the administrative process. The article makes an attempt, taking into account foreign and domestic doctrine, to study numerous definitions for suitability for the formation of a uniform understanding of the administrative process in the Russian Federation. The work, in particular, explores the understanding of public administration and administrative justice, compares the content of the terms “administrative jurisdiction” and “administrative procedures” in Russia and in foreign countries. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the least controversy is caused by the use of the term “administrative proceedings” in relation to out-of-court proceedings and “administrative proceedings” to the judicial trial hearings.
{"title":"The Intersection of Traditional and Modern Terminology as a Barrier in Understanding the Administrative Process","authors":"V. Zyuzin","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-292-300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-292-300","url":null,"abstract":"At present, in connection with the constitutional reform carried out in the Russian Federation, the process of reconciliation of the basic categories of administrative law with the Constitution is actively underway. In parallel, in the scientific community of specialists in administrative law and process, there has long been a request for the harmonization of views and concepts for the formation of modern administrative procedural legislation. Such a serious scientific task can be successfully solved only by relying on the letter and spirit of the country's fundamental law as the only indisputable starting point for doctrinal provisions. The catalyst for many years of discussion about the boundaries and essence of the administrative process was the adoption in 2015 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation. After the enactment of this code in scientific circulation, the categories of “judicial administrative law” and “judicial administrative process” are actively used, which brings the domestic doctrine closer to the theory of developed foreign countries. However, even in the absence of a law in Russia that defines the legal foundations of an extrajudicial administrative process, one should not forget that the majority of modern representatives of science recognize the existence of an extrajudicial administrative process in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the widest range of administrative cases - about the activities of administrative-public bodies to resolve administrative matters under their jurisdiction, both of a regulatory and protective nature, controversial and indisputable. In this situation, we believe that it is required to conduct a scientific analysis of the terminology used in Russia to study the essence of the administrative process. The article makes an attempt, taking into account foreign and domestic doctrine, to study numerous definitions for suitability for the formation of a uniform understanding of the administrative process in the Russian Federation. The work, in particular, explores the understanding of public administration and administrative justice, compares the content of the terms “administrative jurisdiction” and “administrative procedures” in Russia and in foreign countries. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the least controversy is caused by the use of the term “administrative proceedings” in relation to out-of-court proceedings and “administrative proceedings” to the judicial trial hearings.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43909195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-350-358
S. A. Poryvaev
Currently, the process of constitutionalization of administrative law is actively underway in the Russian Federation. It involves the differentiation of administrative and administrative-procedural legislation, as well as the formation of procedures of the administrative process implemented in judicial and non-judicial forms. This, in turn, requires a clear allocation of separate administrative-procedural proceedings, including proceedings for the resolution of administrative disputes. On this basis, the fact is noted that the modern development of administrative law and process should be based on constitutional norms, which implies a significant transformation of the relationship between public authorities and private individuals, turning the latter into a full-fledged subject of administrative legal relations, creating new functions of administrative legal regulation. The research paper analyzes the existing administrative-procedural legislation regulating both non-judicial and judicial procedures for resolving administrative disputes. The specifics of individual legislative acts in this area are studied. In particular, a comparison is made between the general and special procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative disputes. The research paper analyzes the legal regulation of such procedures, the features of individual methods of legislative regulation of the out-of-court procedure for resolving administrative disputes are noted. The article also compares administrative recovery and administrative-rehabilitation administrative disputes. Judicial resolution of administrative disputes has significant specifics due to the special place of the judiciary in a state governed by the rule of law. This is expressed in the special legal consequences of a court decision, as well as in the application of administrative legal principles for more effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in legal relations. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are drawn about the fact that within the framework of administrative procedure legislation, proceedings are formed to resolve administrative disputes both out of court and in court. It also notes the shortcomings and problems of its legal regulation, suggests ways to eliminate them, which can help improve the analyzed production. The consolidation of the procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative and legal disputes should be carried out in a single legislative act, and not within the framework of separate laws and subordinate legal acts. In addition, the resolution of judicial administrative and legal disputes should also be unified within the framework of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, however, taking into account the positive elements that are currently available in the Code of Arbitration Proceedings of the Russian Federation.
{"title":"Proceedings for the Resolution of Judicial and Non-Judicial Administrative Disputes as Part of the Administrative Process","authors":"S. A. Poryvaev","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-350-358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-350-358","url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the process of constitutionalization of administrative law is actively underway in the Russian Federation. It involves the differentiation of administrative and administrative-procedural legislation, as well as the formation of procedures of the administrative process implemented in judicial and non-judicial forms. This, in turn, requires a clear allocation of separate administrative-procedural proceedings, including proceedings for the resolution of administrative disputes. On this basis, the fact is noted that the modern development of administrative law and process should be based on constitutional norms, which implies a significant transformation of the relationship between public authorities and private individuals, turning the latter into a full-fledged subject of administrative legal relations, creating new functions of administrative legal regulation. The research paper analyzes the existing administrative-procedural legislation regulating both non-judicial and judicial procedures for resolving administrative disputes. The specifics of individual legislative acts in this area are studied. In particular, a comparison is made between the general and special procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative disputes. The research paper analyzes the legal regulation of such procedures, the features of individual methods of legislative regulation of the out-of-court procedure for resolving administrative disputes are noted. The article also compares administrative recovery and administrative-rehabilitation administrative disputes. Judicial resolution of administrative disputes has significant specifics due to the special place of the judiciary in a state governed by the rule of law. This is expressed in the special legal consequences of a court decision, as well as in the application of administrative legal principles for more effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in legal relations. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are drawn about the fact that within the framework of administrative procedure legislation, proceedings are formed to resolve administrative disputes both out of court and in court. It also notes the shortcomings and problems of its legal regulation, suggests ways to eliminate them, which can help improve the analyzed production. The consolidation of the procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative and legal disputes should be carried out in a single legislative act, and not within the framework of separate laws and subordinate legal acts. In addition, the resolution of judicial administrative and legal disputes should also be unified within the framework of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, however, taking into account the positive elements that are currently available in the Code of Arbitration Proceedings of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49153983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-328-338
P. Kononov
An Author’s approach to substantiating the concept of an integrative understanding of the administrative process as a combination of two components is proposed: the executive administrative process and the judicial administrative process. The approaches that have developed in domestic legal science are refuted, according to which the legal process can take place only in the administration of justice, only in the resolution of disputes and in the presence of at least two disputing parties, and the administrative process is identified with administrative proceedings. Based on the interpretation of the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the article shows that each of the three branches of state power: legislative, executive and judicial, has its own procedural form of functioning. Such a procedural form of exercising executive power, according to the Author, is an extrajudicial (executive) administrative process. Examples are given that show the existence of a common algorithm for resolving administrative cases by both administrative-public bodies and courts, which indicates a single procedural nature of the corresponding types of judicial and extrajudicial activities and the absence of fundamental differences between them. The conclusion is substantiated that the legal enforcement process is the activity of the competent authorities to resolve any categories of individual legal cases, and the legal procedural procedure is the procedure for carrying out such activities, in connection with which they are related to each other as content and form. The Author concludes that the law enforcement process carried out by public administrative bodies, both positive and jurisdictional, can be characterized as an administrative process and is not, in contrast to administrative proceedings, a kind of administrative procedure. Administrative proceedings are considered as a meaningful category of executive administrative process, namely, as an activity for the consistent, stage-by-stage resolution of an administrative case. The close relationship and interdependence of executive and judicial administrative processes are shown, the presence of which indicates that these two types of process are constituent parts of a single whole - the administrative process as a general procedural category, in connection with which it is possible to properly construct and systematize the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation.
{"title":"Several Theses in Support of an Integrative Understanding of the Administrative Process","authors":"P. Kononov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-328-338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-328-338","url":null,"abstract":"An Author’s approach to substantiating the concept of an integrative understanding of the administrative process as a combination of two components is proposed: the executive administrative process and the judicial administrative process. The approaches that have developed in domestic legal science are refuted, according to which the legal process can take place only in the administration of justice, only in the resolution of disputes and in the presence of at least two disputing parties, and the administrative process is identified with administrative proceedings. Based on the interpretation of the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the article shows that each of the three branches of state power: legislative, executive and judicial, has its own procedural form of functioning. Such a procedural form of exercising executive power, according to the Author, is an extrajudicial (executive) administrative process. Examples are given that show the existence of a common algorithm for resolving administrative cases by both administrative-public bodies and courts, which indicates a single procedural nature of the corresponding types of judicial and extrajudicial activities and the absence of fundamental differences between them. The conclusion is substantiated that the legal enforcement process is the activity of the competent authorities to resolve any categories of individual legal cases, and the legal procedural procedure is the procedure for carrying out such activities, in connection with which they are related to each other as content and form. The Author concludes that the law enforcement process carried out by public administrative bodies, both positive and jurisdictional, can be characterized as an administrative process and is not, in contrast to administrative proceedings, a kind of administrative procedure. Administrative proceedings are considered as a meaningful category of executive administrative process, namely, as an activity for the consistent, stage-by-stage resolution of an administrative case. The close relationship and interdependence of executive and judicial administrative processes are shown, the presence of which indicates that these two types of process are constituent parts of a single whole - the administrative process as a general procedural category, in connection with which it is possible to properly construct and systematize the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48069150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-301-312
P. E. Spiridonov
The subject of research in this paper is the administrative-procedural form and stages of the administrative process. The purpose of the study is to analyze the essential characteristics of the administrative-procedural form and stages. It is stated that the evolution of the administrative process and administrative-procedural legal relations entailed changes in the administrative-procedural form, which were influenced by changes in the political system and the system of public administration in the Russian Federation. It is concluded that the improvement of the administrative process and its form ensures compliance with both the interests of the state and society, as well as the rights and legitimate interests of citizens. Attention is drawn to the fact that one of the characteristic features of administrative-procedural legal relations that distinguish it from other types of procedural legal relations – arbitration, civil, criminal, constitutional, is the administrative-procedural form, which is characterized by out-of-court, pre-trial and judicial procedures of proceedings in an administrative case, due to the specifics and features of its subject. The author notes that the administrative-procedural form is an external expression of administrative-procedural activity, and the stages are its internal content. At the same time, the stages of the administrative process are separate, but interrelated stages consisting of administrative procedural actions united by common tasks and intermediate and final administrative procedural decisions, procedural deadlines. Attention is drawn to a certain specificity of the stages of the administrative process, which consists in the fact that they cannot be clearly divided into judicial and pre-trial stages, as it is in the criminal process. The system of stages of the administrative process should be the same for all types of administrative proceedings, since this follows from the principle of self-similarity, when the particular comes from the general and corresponds to it. To determine the place of administrative judicial procedure in the administrative process, it is necessary to understand that the court, as a subject of administrative procedural legal relations, can enter into the process at different stages, and it is not the only subject of administrative procedural relations that makes legally significant procedural decisions. The methodological basis of the article is dialectical, formal-logical methods, formal-legal method and method of interpretation of law.
{"title":"Administrative-Procedural Form and Stages as Elements of the Characteristics of the Administrative Process","authors":"P. E. Spiridonov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-301-312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-301-312","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of research in this paper is the administrative-procedural form and stages of the administrative process. The purpose of the study is to analyze the essential characteristics of the administrative-procedural form and stages. It is stated that the evolution of the administrative process and administrative-procedural legal relations entailed changes in the administrative-procedural form, which were influenced by changes in the political system and the system of public administration in the Russian Federation. It is concluded that the improvement of the administrative process and its form ensures compliance with both the interests of the state and society, as well as the rights and legitimate interests of citizens. Attention is drawn to the fact that one of the characteristic features of administrative-procedural legal relations that distinguish it from other types of procedural legal relations – arbitration, civil, criminal, constitutional, is the administrative-procedural form, which is characterized by out-of-court, pre-trial and judicial procedures of proceedings in an administrative case, due to the specifics and features of its subject. The author notes that the administrative-procedural form is an external expression of administrative-procedural activity, and the stages are its internal content. At the same time, the stages of the administrative process are separate, but interrelated stages consisting of administrative procedural actions united by common tasks and intermediate and final administrative procedural decisions, procedural deadlines. Attention is drawn to a certain specificity of the stages of the administrative process, which consists in the fact that they cannot be clearly divided into judicial and pre-trial stages, as it is in the criminal process. The system of stages of the administrative process should be the same for all types of administrative proceedings, since this follows from the principle of self-similarity, when the particular comes from the general and corresponds to it. To determine the place of administrative judicial procedure in the administrative process, it is necessary to understand that the court, as a subject of administrative procedural legal relations, can enter into the process at different stages, and it is not the only subject of administrative procedural relations that makes legally significant procedural decisions. The methodological basis of the article is dialectical, formal-logical methods, formal-legal method and method of interpretation of law.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42204171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-313-327
A. Stakhov
The article highlights and criticizes two mutually exclusive approaches to understanding the administrative process that currently exist in Russia, which emasculate its complex content, predetermined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. From the system analysis of art. 10, 18, 72, 118, 126, 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation the administrative procedure legislation of the Russian Federation is distinguished, which is considered as a single legal basis for the administrative proceedings carried out by the courts (including: the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, courts of general jurisdiction, arbitration courts), and the administrative process carried out by the public administration (including: federal executive authorities, executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation and local self-government bodies performing administrative and public functions, as well as organizations, which, by virtue of federal law, have the status of a state or other body for the purpose of performing certain administrative and public functions). With this approach, two components are distinguished in the structure of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation: 1) administrative-procedural legislation that forms the legal basis of judicial administrative proceedings; 2) administrative-procedural legislation that forms the legal basis of executive (non-judicial) judicial administrative proceedings. Developing the information-psychological approach developed in the theory of law, in relation to the scientific knowledge of the administrative process, administrative-indicating legal norms are distinguished, the analysis of which allows us to reveal the content, form and structure of the judicial administrative process, as well as the executive (non-judicial) administrative process and to establish an integrative relationship between them. Using such a scientific technique, the following is distinguished: 1) a group of administrative-indexing norms that establish discretionary (descriptive) information about judicial administrative cases; 2) a group of administrative-indexing norms that establish discretionary (descriptive) information about non-judicial administrative cases. By means of a differentiated analysis of the selected legal norms, it is argued: judicial and extrajudicial administrative cases are separated, differentiated concepts of administrative proceedings and administrative proceedings are introduced, the structure of judicial and executive (extra-judicial) administrative proceedings is revealed. Based on the developed scientific positions, the key proposals for the systematization of the judicial administrative process and the executive (non-judicial) administrative process in Russia are put forward. Summarizing the above, it is concluded that the presented integrative approach to understanding the administrative process and the proposals put forward on its basis for differentiated syst
{"title":"The Integrative Theory of the Administrative Process is the Only True Basis for Building a Model of the Administrative Process","authors":"A. Stakhov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-313-327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-313-327","url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights and criticizes two mutually exclusive approaches to understanding the administrative process that currently exist in Russia, which emasculate its complex content, predetermined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. From the system analysis of art. 10, 18, 72, 118, 126, 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation the administrative procedure legislation of the Russian Federation is distinguished, which is considered as a single legal basis for the administrative proceedings carried out by the courts (including: the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, courts of general jurisdiction, arbitration courts), and the administrative process carried out by the public administration (including: federal executive authorities, executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation and local self-government bodies performing administrative and public functions, as well as organizations, which, by virtue of federal law, have the status of a state or other body for the purpose of performing certain administrative and public functions). With this approach, two components are distinguished in the structure of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation: 1) administrative-procedural legislation that forms the legal basis of judicial administrative proceedings; 2) administrative-procedural legislation that forms the legal basis of executive (non-judicial) judicial administrative proceedings. Developing the information-psychological approach developed in the theory of law, in relation to the scientific knowledge of the administrative process, administrative-indicating legal norms are distinguished, the analysis of which allows us to reveal the content, form and structure of the judicial administrative process, as well as the executive (non-judicial) administrative process and to establish an integrative relationship between them. Using such a scientific technique, the following is distinguished: 1) a group of administrative-indexing norms that establish discretionary (descriptive) information about judicial administrative cases; 2) a group of administrative-indexing norms that establish discretionary (descriptive) information about non-judicial administrative cases. By means of a differentiated analysis of the selected legal norms, it is argued: judicial and extrajudicial administrative cases are separated, differentiated concepts of administrative proceedings and administrative proceedings are introduced, the structure of judicial and executive (extra-judicial) administrative proceedings is revealed. Based on the developed scientific positions, the key proposals for the systematization of the judicial administrative process and the executive (non-judicial) administrative process in Russia are put forward. Summarizing the above, it is concluded that the presented integrative approach to understanding the administrative process and the proposals put forward on its basis for differentiated syst","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44823459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：