Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2021-02-032-042
Artyom A. Garin
Australia successfully combines a unique geopolitical position in the Asia- Pacific, as well as economic potential. At the same time, the emerging trade dependence of the Fifth Continent on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is increasingly affecting Canberra’s foreign policy year by year. The aggravation of Sino- U.S. relations has also led to tension between Australia and China. In 2020, the world faced the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused negative impacts on the global economy, and trade tensions began between the two states. In early 2021 Beijng also suspended all activity under the China- Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue for an indefinite period. All these events give the research of trade and economic relations between Australia and the PRC a great practical focus, including allowing us to more specifically identify the degree of dependence of the economy of the Fifth Continent on the situation in China or the degree of Sino- Australian relation. This article examines the consequences of the suspension China- Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue, in particular, its impact on the future prospects for the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two countries. Special attention is paid to the impact of China’s economic growth rates on the Australian economy. At the same time, the author aggregates the trade and economic strategies of Australia as a middle power, considering Canberra’s response to the transformation of the regional architecture in the Asia- Pacific. The provisions and conclusions presented in this article are based on the study of the works of leading international researchers specializing in foreign policy and economic issues of Australia, as well as Sino- Australian relations.
{"title":"THE FEATURES OF MODERN SINO-AUSTRALIAN TRADE AND ECONOMIC RELATION IN THE CONTEXT OF CHANGING ASIA-PACIFIC","authors":"Artyom A. Garin","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2021-02-032-042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2021-02-032-042","url":null,"abstract":"Australia successfully combines a unique geopolitical position in the Asia- Pacific, as well as economic potential. At the same time, the emerging trade dependence of the Fifth Continent on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is increasingly affecting Canberra’s foreign policy year by year. The aggravation of Sino- U.S. relations has also led to tension between Australia and China. In 2020, the world faced the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused negative impacts on the global economy, and trade tensions began between the two states. In early 2021 Beijng also suspended all activity under the China- Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue for an indefinite period. All these events give the research of trade and economic relations between Australia and the PRC a great practical focus, including allowing us to more specifically identify the degree of dependence of the economy of the Fifth Continent on the situation in China or the degree of Sino- Australian relation. This article examines the consequences of the suspension China- Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue, in particular, its impact on the future prospects for the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two countries. Special attention is paid to the impact of China’s economic growth rates on the Australian economy. At the same time, the author aggregates the trade and economic strategies of Australia as a middle power, considering Canberra’s response to the transformation of the regional architecture in the Asia- Pacific. The provisions and conclusions presented in this article are based on the study of the works of leading international researchers specializing in foreign policy and economic issues of Australia, as well as Sino- Australian relations.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131969293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-098-108
E. Dunaeva
Since the first days of the Russia's special operation in Ukraine the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran has demonstrated a benevolently neutral stance. Stressing the unacceptability of military action as a means of solving conflicts, the Iranian side blames the United States and European countries for unleashing war. They provoked Russia by bringing NATO forces closer to its borders, which led to war. Showing a correct understanding of the reasons for the start of the special operation, official Tehran does not recognize the annexation of new territories and Crimea to Russia, emphasizing the inviolability of international borders. Iran categorically denies allegations of its involvement in military actions and stresses the fact that it does not provide direct military assistance to any of the parties to the conflict. The official Iranian stance has significantly intensified Russian-Iranian cooperation and, to some extent, minimized the impact of sanctions imposed on Russia. The use of Iran's economic and transit potential provides an opportunity to create a new export-import route. The prospects for joint industrial productions are being worked out. Trade exchanges are expanding. Iranian reformist and centrist forces condemn Russia's actions, criticize Iranian authorities for deepening military cooperation with Russia as it hinders the continuation of negotiations between the IRI and European countries on the restoration of the JCPOA.
{"title":"RUSSIA’S SPECIAL OPERATION IN UKRAINE: A VIEW FROM TEHRAN","authors":"E. Dunaeva","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-098-108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-098-108","url":null,"abstract":"Since the first days of the Russia's special operation in Ukraine the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran has demonstrated a benevolently neutral stance. Stressing the unacceptability of military action as a means of solving conflicts, the Iranian side blames the United States and European countries for unleashing war. They provoked Russia by bringing NATO forces closer to its borders, which led to war. Showing a correct understanding of the reasons for the start of the special operation, official Tehran does not recognize the annexation of new territories and Crimea to Russia, emphasizing the inviolability of international borders. Iran categorically denies allegations of its involvement in military actions and stresses the fact that it does not provide direct military assistance to any of the parties to the conflict. The official Iranian stance has significantly intensified Russian-Iranian cooperation and, to some extent, minimized the impact of sanctions imposed on Russia. The use of Iran's economic and transit potential provides an opportunity to create a new export-import route. The prospects for joint industrial productions are being worked out. Trade exchanges are expanding. Iranian reformist and centrist forces condemn Russia's actions, criticize Iranian authorities for deepening military cooperation with Russia as it hinders the continuation of negotiations between the IRI and European countries on the restoration of the JCPOA.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132238979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2022-02-042-049
Irina N. Serenko
. In this artcle, an atempt has been made to reveal through the prism of Russia‑Ukrain military confrontaton the US intentons to create a global system of states subordinaton to its world dominaton. The example of Pakistan evidently shows Washington's intolerant attude to the independent foreign policy manifestatons of any country, which is at odds with their interests. And in the American arsenal there are various instruments for punishing "disobedient" states, including the removal of unsuitable governments.
{"title":"REACTION IN PAKISTAN ON RUSSIA SPECIAL OPERATION IN UKRAINE","authors":"Irina N. Serenko","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2022-02-042-049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2022-02-042-049","url":null,"abstract":". In this artcle, an atempt has been made to reveal through the prism of Russia‑Ukrain military confrontaton the US intentons to create a global system of states subordinaton to its world dominaton. The example of Pakistan evidently shows Washington's intolerant attude to the independent foreign policy manifestatons of any country, which is at odds with their interests. And in the American arsenal there are various instruments for punishing \"disobedient\" states, including the removal of unsuitable governments.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132604333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2022-01-068-076
Irina N. Serenko
The artcle examines Russia and Pakistan bilateral relatons in the multrateral framework of the Shanghai Cooperaton Organizaton. It is revealed, that Moscow and Islamabad had been considerably intensifed their cooperaton with Pakistan admission to SCO on the extensive support of Russia. Their cooperaton has been gradually reaching a new level of mutually benefcial partnership as a refecton of their involvement in the process of Eurasian integraton.
{"title":"RUSSIA AND PAKISTAN INTERACTION IN SCO FRAMEWORK","authors":"Irina N. Serenko","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2022-01-068-076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2022-01-068-076","url":null,"abstract":"The artcle examines Russia and Pakistan bilateral relatons in the multrateral framework of the Shanghai Cooperaton Organizaton. It is revealed, that Moscow and Islamabad had been considerably intensifed their cooperaton with Pakistan admission to SCO on the extensive support of Russia. Their cooperaton has been gradually reaching a new level of mutually benefcial partnership as a refecton of their involvement in the process of Eurasian integraton.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127261358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-061-073
A. Zakharov, Serge Rabey
The article examines the Indian approach to the Ukrainian crisis a year after the start of the active phase of the military actions. The authors consider new aspects of the strategic dialogue between Russia and India, analyze the Indian position in voting at the United Nations level, study expert discussions, assess the impact of the conflict on trade and economic cooperation between the two countries. The Ukrainian conflict did not have a significant impact on the political contacts between Russia and India, although it led to an exacerbation of differences in the perception of geopolitical processes associated with the movement of countries towards opposite global centers of power - China and the United States, respectively. The crisis slightly changed the structure of the countries' trade and economic ties, although it brought about record volumes in India's imports of Russian energy resources. However, the growth in trade opens up the potential for a wider range of mechanisms of economic interaction in the long term.
{"title":"INDIA’S APPROACH TO THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE: ONE YEAR ON","authors":"A. Zakharov, Serge Rabey","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-061-073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2023-02-061-073","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the Indian approach to the Ukrainian crisis a year after the start of the active phase of the military actions. The authors consider new aspects of the strategic dialogue between Russia and India, analyze the Indian position in voting at the United Nations level, study expert discussions, assess the impact of the conflict on trade and economic cooperation between the two countries. The Ukrainian conflict did not have a significant impact on the political contacts between Russia and India, although it led to an exacerbation of differences in the perception of geopolitical processes associated with the movement of countries towards opposite global centers of power - China and the United States, respectively. The crisis slightly changed the structure of the countries' trade and economic ties, although it brought about record volumes in India's imports of Russian energy resources. However, the growth in trade opens up the potential for a wider range of mechanisms of economic interaction in the long term.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125707265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2020-02-103-110
Ruslan Prohorov
The article discusses the political, economic and cultural cooperation of Pakistan with France in the twenty-first century. Attention is drawn to a peculiar bias towards France in the frequency of political and diplomatic visits by representatives of Pakistan. Due to the fact that France is a traditional donor of the Pakistani economy, attention is drawn to the desire of the partiesto increase the role of public diplomacy in the development of trade and economic relations. Meanwhile, France is Pakistan’s long-standing export partner, one of the top ten countries in which Pakistan exports its goods. The importance of developing such areas of cooperation as energy and transport is emphasized. Military-technical cooperation is singled out as a traditional area of cooperation between Pakistan and France. The role of France in the creation and development ofthe naval forces of Pakistan isindicated. The complicated relations between countries on the issue of nuclear cooperation are shown. The article also discussessecurity issues, namely, current bilateral documents, joint effortsto combat terrorism, and the regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons are presented. Interaction in the field of culture is presented on the example of the work of the three centers of the French public organization Alliance de Frances. Separately, attention is drawn to the interaction of state structures of the two countries regarding the return of relics illegally exported from Pakistan. In conclusion, it is assumed that Pakistan’s orientation towards France is quite justified, since this European state has always been friendly to it, is powerful in its economic potential and resources, and the development of relations with this country does not conflict with the orientation towards the United States.
{"title":"ПАКИСТАНО-ФРАНЦУЗСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ В ХХI в.","authors":"Ruslan Prohorov","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2020-02-103-110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2020-02-103-110","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the political, economic and cultural cooperation of Pakistan with France in the twenty-first century. Attention is drawn to a peculiar bias towards France in the frequency of political and diplomatic visits by representatives of Pakistan. Due to the fact that France is a traditional donor of the Pakistani economy, attention is drawn to the desire of the partiesto increase the role of public diplomacy in the development of trade and economic relations. Meanwhile, France is Pakistan’s long-standing export partner, one of the top ten countries in which Pakistan exports its goods. The importance of developing such areas of cooperation as energy and transport is emphasized. Military-technical cooperation is singled out as a traditional area of cooperation between Pakistan and France. The role of France in the creation and development ofthe naval forces of Pakistan isindicated. The complicated relations between countries on the issue of nuclear cooperation are shown. The article also discussessecurity issues, namely, current bilateral documents, joint effortsto combat terrorism, and the regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons are presented. Interaction in the field of culture is presented on the example of the work of the three centers of the French public organization Alliance de Frances. Separately, attention is drawn to the interaction of state structures of the two countries regarding the return of relics illegally exported from Pakistan. In conclusion, it is assumed that Pakistan’s orientation towards France is quite justified, since this European state has always been friendly to it, is powerful in its economic potential and resources, and the development of relations with this country does not conflict with the orientation towards the United States.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129087610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2021-03-037-045
U. Okimbekov
{"title":"REVANCHE OF THE TALIBAN AND THE AFGHAN ECONOMY","authors":"U. Okimbekov","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2021-03-037-045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2021-03-037-045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126193685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2020-01-125-133
M. Borisov
The transition of world energy to renewable energy sources is changing the geopolitical importance of both countries exporting fossil fuels and importing ones. The energy map of the world is being redrawn; the geography and structure of energy supplies are changing. The essence of energy security is changing radically.
{"title":"Energy Transition and Geopolitics","authors":"M. Borisov","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2020-01-125-133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2020-01-125-133","url":null,"abstract":"The transition of world energy to renewable energy sources is changing the geopolitical importance of both countries exporting fossil fuels and importing ones. The energy map of the world is being redrawn; the geography and structure of energy supplies are changing. The essence of energy security is changing radically.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121722489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-134-150
A. Khazanov, S. Gasratyan
The authors describe the relations between Iran and the Palestinian movement since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. Israel always accused Iran of funding Palestinian terror. But though Israel accused Iran of its support for Palestinian nationalist groups the iranian leaders themselves blamed Yasser Arafat for Oslo talks with Israel. After Oslo Tehran provided with money and weapons only HAMAS and Islamic Jihad.
{"title":"IRAN AND THE PALESTINIAN PROBLEM","authors":"A. Khazanov, S. Gasratyan","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-134-150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-134-150","url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe the relations between Iran and the Palestinian movement since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. Israel always accused Iran of funding Palestinian terror. But though Israel accused Iran of its support for Palestinian nationalist groups the iranian leaders themselves blamed Yasser Arafat for Oslo talks with Israel. After Oslo Tehran provided with money and weapons only HAMAS and Islamic Jihad.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131393559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-100-107
Sameuliah Poya
: The article shows that Afghanistan's transport communications system plays an important role in integrating the region's transport links. The development of a transport communication system has become one of the most important political and economic tasks of the Government. Its solution is primarily necessary for the development of Afghanistan's trade with Central Asia, China, Turkey, Iran, India and Pakistan.
{"title":"INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN THE CONTEXT OF AFGHANISTAN’S TRANSPORT COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT","authors":"Sameuliah Poya","doi":"10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-100-107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2227-5568-2021-01-100-107","url":null,"abstract":": The article shows that Afghanistan's transport communications system plays an important role in integrating the region's transport links. The development of a transport communication system has become one of the most important political and economic tasks of the Government. Its solution is primarily necessary for the development of Afghanistan's trade with Central Asia, China, Turkey, Iran, India and Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":333639,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131398899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：