{"title":"Ultima ratio in the light of criminal offence Construction without a building permit (Art. 219a CC)","authors":"Jovana Banović","doi":"10.5937/CRIMEN1901069B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/CRIMEN1901069B","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Girl's crime in Belgrade: Study of subgroups identification","authors":"Natalija Lukić","doi":"10.5937/crimen1903257l","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1903257l","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The structure of paper deviates from the usual. The questions brought up in paper are elaborated in form of "one by one certain article analysis" relating expert examination matter in Criminal Procedure Code (of the Republic of Serbia). In particular, the author points out that the provisions of the CPC regulating the expert examination have become completely unnecessary because of two reasons. The first one is that the provisions themselves are mutually dramatically uncoordinated almost to the extent that one excludes the other. The first reason has the important incentive in ignorance of the meaning of the terms that the CPC uses. In other words, a lawmaker considers synonyms the terms that are certainly not and thus unconsciously points to a far deeper problem. The second reason is that the provisions that have proved to be valid in the nomotechnical sense are profiled as meaningless because they can be violated without any procedural sanction. This refers primarily to the "false" existence of a set of defense rights for which there are no means of enforcing the organ of authority to respect them or at least sanctioning the organ for such disrespect. In this paper, a review is made of certain solutions from the Criminal Procedure Codes of the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of Austria, as well as the leading positions in German and Austrian criminal procedural law literature.
{"title":"Unacceptable procedural condition in field of expert examination as evidentiary action shaped by CPC and court practice","authors":"Nikola Vukovic","doi":"10.5937/CRIMEN1901037V","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/CRIMEN1901037V","url":null,"abstract":"The structure of paper deviates from the usual. The questions brought up in paper are elaborated in form of \"one by one certain article analysis\" relating expert examination matter in Criminal Procedure Code (of the Republic of Serbia). In particular, the author points out that the provisions of the CPC regulating the expert examination have become completely unnecessary because of two reasons. The first one is that the provisions themselves are mutually dramatically uncoordinated almost to the extent that one excludes the other. The first reason has the important incentive in ignorance of the meaning of the terms that the CPC uses. In other words, a lawmaker considers synonyms the terms that are certainly not and thus unconsciously points to a far deeper problem. The second reason is that the provisions that have proved to be valid in the nomotechnical sense are profiled as meaningless because they can be violated without any procedural sanction. This refers primarily to the \"false\" existence of a set of defense rights for which there are no means of enforcing the organ of authority to respect them or at least sanctioning the organ for such disrespect. In this paper, a review is made of certain solutions from the Criminal Procedure Codes of the Federal Republic of Germany and Republic of Austria, as well as the leading positions in German and Austrian criminal procedural law literature.","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Osvrt Ustavnog suda da je za ocenu osnovanosti ustavne žalbe od prvenstvenog znacaja da li je krivicni postupak vođen u skladu sa zahtevom hitnosti, sud zavrsava konstatacijom "da je postupak relativno složen, pre svega zbog kompleksnih i cinjenicnih pitanja koja nadležni sud treba da raspravi i oceni i na osnovu kojih treba da potom donese odluku"27. Svodeci pravo na pravicno suđenje garantovano clanom 6 EKLJP, Ustavom RS, osnovnim nacelima krivicnog procesnog prava, na puku proklamaciju, bez razmatranja konkretnih okolnosti koje mogu biti od znacaja pri oceni da li postupak dugo traje, slabi funkciju Ustavnog suda kao zastitnika ljudskih prava. Pretežnost dužine trajanja pritvora u ovom slucaju, postojanje relevenatnog zakonskog osnova za određivanje pritvora odnosno obrazloženja za produženje pritvora, prividno baca senku na znacaj dužine trajanja postupka. Međutim, pitanje dugog trajanja postupka u bliskoj vezi je sa pitanjem trajanja pritvora. Davanjem odgovora na pitanje da li je sud zaista postupao sa narocitom hitnoscu, bliže, zbog cega je bio onemogucen da krivicni postupak ranije okonca, koji su to objektivni procesni razlozi zbog kojih sud nije bio u mogucnosti da privede kraju krivicni postupak u toku koga su okrivljeni bili dostupni sudu punih sest godina, daje se i odgovor na pitanje opravdanosti trajanja pritvora dugih sest godina. Izdvojenim misljenjem, sudija Ustavnog suda ukazuje na sustinu zbog koje se cini da je odluka problematicna: "Pocev od toga da je u pitanju tesko krivicno delo, dužina trajanja pritvora od sest godina i dva meseca, sest meseci bez urucenog obrazloženog resenja odnosno sest meseci nemogucnosti ulaganja pravnog leka, cinjenica da je jedan od dva optužena posle toliko godina trajanja postupka provedenog u pritvoru oslobođen, do toga da je postupak pred Ustavnim sudom trajao pune cetiri godine i to u odnosu na ljudska prava koja se moraju razmatrati hitno."28 Ustavni sud nije nasao za shodno da meritorno razmotri razloge o povredi prava iz clana 27 Ustava. Jednostavnije je bilo ustavnu žalbu odbaciti kao neblagovremenu, nego se meritorno upustati u resavanje situacije u kojoj suprotno svim opstim pravilima o zastiti ljudskih prava, okrivljeni borave u pritvoru sest meseci bez formalne odluke i prava da zakonitost lisenja slobode bude ispitano u skladu sa odredbama zakona. Cinjenica je da je Ustavni sud o povredama ustavnih prava odlucivao u postupku koji je trajao cetiri godine. Osnovano se postavlja pitanje svrsishodnosti postupka koji tek posle cetiri godine ispituje zakonitost pritvora kao hitne mere i povrede prava na slobodu i pravicno suđenje. Dužnost svih organa je da o pritvoru odlucuju sa narocitom hitnoscu upravo imajuci u vidu znacaj povrede osnovnog ljudskog prava na slobodu. Tendencija svih savremenih država jeste da u hitnim, kratkim rokovima odlucuje o povredama zagarantovanih osnovnih ljudskih prava. Suprotno postupanje sudova i državnih organa negira vladavinu prava kao vrhovni postulat drža
根据宪法法院的裁决，法院的结论是，诉讼程序相对复杂，最重要的是，因为法院必须讨论和评估复杂的事实问题，并在此基础上做出决定。27在简短的声明中，证人享有《欧洲刑事诉讼法》第6条、《塞尔维亚共和国宪法》、刑事诉讼法基本原则所保障的法律审判权，在不考虑评估程序是否持续时间的具体情况的情况下，宪法法院作为人权捍卫者的职能较弱。在这种情况下，拘留期的期限，即确定拘留或延长拘留期的相关法律依据的存在，最好会给程序的期限蒙上阴影。然而，长期做法的问题是拘留期限的问题。在回答法院是否真的处理了一个特定的紧急情况，该紧急情况阻止了刑事诉讼提前结束，这是法院无法结束刑事诉讼的客观程序原因，在此期间，法院被指控六年，答案也是关于逮捕期限为六年的正当理由。Izdvojeim misljenjem，宪法法院法官指出，该制度似乎存在问题：“艰难的刑事诉讼的开始，六年零两个月的拘留期，六个月没有任何解释，或者六个月无法投资购买合法药物，是因为两名被告中的一人在经过这么多年的拘留程序后被释放，直到宪法法院的程序持续了四年等等。执行必须紧急考虑的人权。“28宪法法院认为不适合考虑损害《宪法》第27条权利的合理理由。更简单的做法是，将宪法上诉视为无争议的上诉予以驳回，而不是可衡量地提及这样一种情况：在这种情况下，违反所有关于保护人权的严格规则，在没有正式决定的情况下被拘留六个月，并有权行使行动自由法注意法律规则。事实上，宪法法院的裁决程序持续了四年。这一问题的基础是诉讼程序的普遍性，四年后，诉讼程序审查了作为紧急措施的监禁的合法性以及对自由和正义权的损害。所有机关的责任是根据基本人权受到的损害，在特定紧急情况下决定监禁。所有现代国家的趋势是，在紧急、短期内，它决定损害保障的基本人权。sudova的职位是državnih organa negira vladavinu prava kao vrhovni的职位。
{"title":"Povodom jedne odluke Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije","authors":"Marina Brašovan-Delić","doi":"10.5937/CRIMEN1901087B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/CRIMEN1901087B","url":null,"abstract":"Osvrt Ustavnog suda da je za ocenu osnovanosti ustavne žalbe od prvenstvenog znacaja da li je krivicni postupak vođen u skladu sa zahtevom hitnosti, sud zavrsava konstatacijom \"da je postupak relativno složen, pre svega zbog kompleksnih i cinjenicnih pitanja koja nadležni sud treba da raspravi i oceni i na osnovu kojih treba da potom donese odluku\"27. Svodeci pravo na pravicno suđenje garantovano clanom 6 EKLJP, Ustavom RS, osnovnim nacelima krivicnog procesnog prava, na puku proklamaciju, bez razmatranja konkretnih okolnosti koje mogu biti od znacaja pri oceni da li postupak dugo traje, slabi funkciju Ustavnog suda kao zastitnika ljudskih prava. Pretežnost dužine trajanja pritvora u ovom slucaju, postojanje relevenatnog zakonskog osnova za određivanje pritvora odnosno obrazloženja za produženje pritvora, prividno baca senku na znacaj dužine trajanja postupka. Međutim, pitanje dugog trajanja postupka u bliskoj vezi je sa pitanjem trajanja pritvora. Davanjem odgovora na pitanje da li je sud zaista postupao sa narocitom hitnoscu, bliže, zbog cega je bio onemogucen da krivicni postupak ranije okonca, koji su to objektivni procesni razlozi zbog kojih sud nije bio u mogucnosti da privede kraju krivicni postupak u toku koga su okrivljeni bili dostupni sudu punih sest godina, daje se i odgovor na pitanje opravdanosti trajanja pritvora dugih sest godina. Izdvojenim misljenjem, sudija Ustavnog suda ukazuje na sustinu zbog koje se cini da je odluka problematicna: \"Pocev od toga da je u pitanju tesko krivicno delo, dužina trajanja pritvora od sest godina i dva meseca, sest meseci bez urucenog obrazloženog resenja odnosno sest meseci nemogucnosti ulaganja pravnog leka, cinjenica da je jedan od dva optužena posle toliko godina trajanja postupka provedenog u pritvoru oslobođen, do toga da je postupak pred Ustavnim sudom trajao pune cetiri godine i to u odnosu na ljudska prava koja se moraju razmatrati hitno.\"28 Ustavni sud nije nasao za shodno da meritorno razmotri razloge o povredi prava iz clana 27 Ustava. Jednostavnije je bilo ustavnu žalbu odbaciti kao neblagovremenu, nego se meritorno upustati u resavanje situacije u kojoj suprotno svim opstim pravilima o zastiti ljudskih prava, okrivljeni borave u pritvoru sest meseci bez formalne odluke i prava da zakonitost lisenja slobode bude ispitano u skladu sa odredbama zakona. Cinjenica je da je Ustavni sud o povredama ustavnih prava odlucivao u postupku koji je trajao cetiri godine. Osnovano se postavlja pitanje svrsishodnosti postupka koji tek posle cetiri godine ispituje zakonitost pritvora kao hitne mere i povrede prava na slobodu i pravicno suđenje. Dužnost svih organa je da o pritvoru odlucuju sa narocitom hitnoscu upravo imajuci u vidu znacaj povrede osnovnog ljudskog prava na slobodu. Tendencija svih savremenih država jeste da u hitnim, kratkim rokovima odlucuje o povredama zagarantovanih osnovnih ljudskih prava. Suprotno postupanje sudova i državnih organa negira vladavinu prava kao vrhovni postulat drža","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite several works devoted in recent years to the criminal offense of money laundering, certain issues of the boundaries of its criminal zone continue to intrigue. In addition to reminding of the most important points of dispute, the author particularly considers the subjective side of this crime and especially its form that implies that money laundering can be done with the property that the perpetrator himself has acquired through previous criminal activity. Special attention is also paid to the issue of possible conflicts of interest of the defense attorney, in case there is a suspicion that the received fee comes from the criminal activity of the defendant.
{"title":"About certain dilemmas concerning criminal protection against money laundering","authors":"I. Vukovic","doi":"10.5937/crimen1902122v","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1902122v","url":null,"abstract":"Despite several works devoted in recent years to the criminal offense of money laundering, certain issues of the boundaries of its criminal zone continue to intrigue. In addition to reminding of the most important points of dispute, the author particularly considers the subjective side of this crime and especially its form that implies that money laundering can be done with the property that the perpetrator himself has acquired through previous criminal activity. Special attention is also paid to the issue of possible conflicts of interest of the defense attorney, in case there is a suspicion that the received fee comes from the criminal activity of the defendant.","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: In 2008, Slovenia introduced the punishment of life imprisonment. Since then it can be imposed for certain crimes against humanity and for the (at least two) crimes of intentional homicide. The proposal for introducing life imprisonment was founded on two arguments: the introduction of life imprisonment being necessary to harmonise Slovenian law with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to harmonise it with the majority of European countries. In public debate, both arguments were rejected as false, while opponents of life imprisonment cited reasons against introducing it (e.g., rehabilitation as a purpose of punishment, respect for human dignity, the inefficiency of severe sentences). In the public debate, also elements of penal populism could be noticed. Although most experts opposed the introduction of life imprisonment, it was adopted in the Slovenian Criminal Code. In 2016, the Ministry of Justice at first proposed abolishing it, but the final political decision was different. A proposal to abolish the life imprisonment was withdrawn from the 2016 amendment to the Criminal Code and the Parliament did not vote on the proposal at all. Although the punishment of life imprisonment has been now a part of Slovenian law for eleven years, it has not yet been imposed.
{"title":"Life imprisonment in Slovenia","authors":"Katja Filipčič","doi":"10.5937/crimen1903225f","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1903225f","url":null,"abstract":": In 2008, Slovenia introduced the punishment of life imprisonment. Since then it can be imposed for certain crimes against humanity and for the (at least two) crimes of intentional homicide. The proposal for introducing life imprisonment was founded on two arguments: the introduction of life imprisonment being necessary to harmonise Slovenian law with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to harmonise it with the majority of European countries. In public debate, both arguments were rejected as false, while opponents of life imprisonment cited reasons against introducing it (e.g., rehabilitation as a purpose of punishment, respect for human dignity, the inefficiency of severe sentences). In the public debate, also elements of penal populism could be noticed. Although most experts opposed the introduction of life imprisonment, it was adopted in the Slovenian Criminal Code. In 2016, the Ministry of Justice at first proposed abolishing it, but the final political decision was different. A proposal to abolish the life imprisonment was withdrawn from the 2016 amendment to the Criminal Code and the Parliament did not vote on the proposal at all. Although the punishment of life imprisonment has been now a part of Slovenian law for eleven years, it has not yet been imposed.","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71208974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper explores the link between alcohol use and traditional family attitudes in the context of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia. This form of violence can be understood as a way to consolidate and preserve power against women. A feminist approach is hence significant in dealing with this serious social problem. According to feminist theories that we refer to, physical force serves to establish control and is considered the most important male resource of power, especially in patriarchal societies. Power is understood as structurally conditioned and supported. For centuries, access to "kafanas" (pubs) and alcohol consumption has been granted exclusively to men. Alcohol use and physical force thus became the most important resources of male power, especially because violence supported by alcohol use was justified and almost taken as a given within the domestic sphere. Still today, traditional family attitudes further support violent behavior, preventing the victims from reporting abusers. The survey on violence against women was conducted on a sample of 2406 women aged 18-75. A sample of families with alcohol problems was identified (211) and compared to the sample that did not include alcohol use (2195). The findings confirmed a significant association of partner violence with alcohol use and the infrequency of reporting partner abuse by victims who support traditional attitudes. Male abusers who consume alcohol and traditionally socialized female victims together maintain a dysfunctional marital dyad.
{"title":"Intimate partner violence, traditional attitudes and alcohol use in Serbia","authors":"Slađana Dragišić-Labaš","doi":"10.5937/crimen1902109d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1902109d","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the link between alcohol use and traditional family attitudes in the context of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia. This form of violence can be understood as a way to consolidate and preserve power against women. A feminist approach is hence significant in dealing with this serious social problem. According to feminist theories that we refer to, physical force serves to establish control and is considered the most important male resource of power, especially in patriarchal societies. Power is understood as structurally conditioned and supported. For centuries, access to \"kafanas\" (pubs) and alcohol consumption has been granted exclusively to men. Alcohol use and physical force thus became the most important resources of male power, especially because violence supported by alcohol use was justified and almost taken as a given within the domestic sphere. Still today, traditional family attitudes further support violent behavior, preventing the victims from reporting abusers. The survey on violence against women was conducted on a sample of 2406 women aged 18-75. A sample of families with alcohol problems was identified (211) and compared to the sample that did not include alcohol use (2195). The findings confirmed a significant association of partner violence with alcohol use and the infrequency of reporting partner abuse by victims who support traditional attitudes. Male abusers who consume alcohol and traditionally socialized female victims together maintain a dysfunctional marital dyad.","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tackling organized crime: From theory to practice","authors":"Lampe von","doi":"10.5937/crimen1903215l","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1903215l","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71208964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supermax institutions and solitary confinement: History, term definition and rationale for spreading","authors":"Đorđe Ignjatović","doi":"10.5937/crimen1903239i","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1903239i","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33895,"journal":{"name":"Crimen Beograd","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71209631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：