首页 > 最新文献

Public Health in Practice最新文献

英文 中文
“If children don't feel safe, they won't come back”: A qualitative exploration of parents' perceptions of health coordinators in a family-based programme in socially disadvantaged communities "如果孩子们没有安全感,他们就不会回来":在社会处境不利的社区开展的一项以家庭为基础的计划中,家长对健康协调员的看法的定性探索。
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100575
Lisette Farias , Mai-Lis Hellenius , Gisela Nyberg , Susanne Andermo

Background

Families residing in disadvantaged communities encounter inequalities that restrict their engagement in physical activity. Family-based interventions and health coordinators have been proposed as promising approaches to encourage physical activity among parents and children. However, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding family experiences of such programmes and the ways health coordinators facilitate continued participation in programmes delivered in disadvantaged communities. The study aimed to explore parents’ perceptions of health coordinators in a family-based physical activity programme, Open Activities, delivered in disadvantaged communities in Sweden.

Study design

An exploratory design with a qualitative ethnographic approach.

Methods

Multiple methods, including 12 interviews, 15 observations and field notes, and prolonged researcher engagement between February 2022 and December 2023, were used to obtain complementary insights into parents’ perceptions and experiences in the Open Activities programme. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

A main theme and three sub-themes emerged from the analysis. The sub-themes reflect participants’ perceptions of how health coordinators provide a sense of safety for parents and children, making them feel appreciated and motivated to continue participating in the programme. The sub-themes also reflect the struggles that families encounter with security and social disorders in their neighbourhoods and how these difficulties influence their participation in outdoor activities and trust in outside people, including health coordinators. This required health coordinators to demonstrate a deep commitment to their communities, cultivate trust and fairness, and take a more assertive role in enforcing rules and ensuring respect.

Conclusion

The involvement of health coordinators, aware of the issues facing disadvantaged communities, could represent a promising avenue for advancing health equity through physical activity. Failure to consider the potential of health coordinators to promote safety can compromise programmes’ sustainability and even exacerbate existing disparities.
背景:居住在弱势社区的家庭遇到了限制他们参与体育活动的不平等现象。已提出以家庭为基础的干预措施和保健协调员,作为鼓励父母和儿童进行体育活动的有希望的办法。然而,人们对这类方案的家庭经验以及保健协调员促进继续参与在处境不利社区实施的方案的方式缺乏了解。该研究旨在探讨家长对在瑞典弱势社区开展的以家庭为基础的体育活动方案“开放活动”中的健康协调员的看法。研究设计:采用定性人种学方法的探索性设计。方法:采用多种方法,包括12次访谈,15次观察和实地记录,以及2022年2月至2023年12月期间长期的研究人员参与,以获得家长对开放活动计划的看法和经验的补充见解。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。结果:从分析中得出一个主旋律和三个副旋律。分主题反映了与会者对卫生协调员如何为父母和儿童提供安全感的看法,使他们感到受到赞赏并有动力继续参与该方案。各分主题还反映了家庭在社区安全和社会混乱中遇到的困难,以及这些困难如何影响他们参与户外活动和对外界人员(包括卫生协调员)的信任。这要求卫生协调员表现出对其社区的深刻承诺,培养信任和公平,并在执行规则和确保尊重方面发挥更坚定的作用。结论:认识到弱势社区面临的问题的卫生协调员的参与可能是通过体育活动促进卫生公平的一个有希望的途径。如果不考虑卫生协调员促进安全的潜力,可能会损害规划的可持续性,甚至加剧现有的差距。
{"title":"“If children don't feel safe, they won't come back”: A qualitative exploration of parents' perceptions of health coordinators in a family-based programme in socially disadvantaged communities","authors":"Lisette Farias ,&nbsp;Mai-Lis Hellenius ,&nbsp;Gisela Nyberg ,&nbsp;Susanne Andermo","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100575","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100575","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Families residing in disadvantaged communities encounter inequalities that restrict their engagement in physical activity. Family-based interventions and health coordinators have been proposed as promising approaches to encourage physical activity among parents and children. However, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding family experiences of such programmes and the ways health coordinators facilitate continued participation in programmes delivered in disadvantaged communities. The study aimed to explore parents’ perceptions of health coordinators in a family-based physical activity programme, Open Activities, delivered in disadvantaged communities in Sweden.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>An exploratory design with a qualitative ethnographic approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multiple methods, including 12 interviews, 15 observations and field notes, and prolonged researcher engagement between February 2022 and December 2023, were used to obtain complementary insights into parents’ perceptions and experiences in the Open Activities programme. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A main theme and three sub-themes emerged from the analysis. The sub-themes reflect participants’ perceptions of how health coordinators provide a sense of safety for parents and children, making them feel appreciated and motivated to continue participating in the programme. The sub-themes also reflect the struggles that families encounter with security and social disorders in their neighbourhoods and how these difficulties influence their participation in outdoor activities and trust in outside people, including health coordinators. This required health coordinators to demonstrate a deep commitment to their communities, cultivate trust and fairness, and take a more assertive role in enforcing rules and ensuring respect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The involvement of health coordinators, aware of the issues facing disadvantaged communities, could represent a promising avenue for advancing health equity through physical activity. Failure to consider the potential of health coordinators to promote safety can compromise programmes’ sustainability and even exacerbate existing disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The persistence of very low correlations between NIH research funding and disease burdens
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100580
Ashley J.R. Carter, Milena Gevorkian

Objectives

The degree to which the allocation of disease-specific research funding by the NIH is proportional to disease burden is an important question. This study examined the historical relationship between NIH funding allocation and disease burden for a variety of medical conditions.

Study design

Coefficients of relatedness for the linear relationships between funding and disease burden for 27 medical conditions over a period exceeding twenty years were calculated.

Methods

Publicly available data from 2009 to 2019, and previously published data from 1994 to 2004, was obtained to compare disease-specific research funding from the NIH to burden of disease values (mortality, prevalence, incidence, DALYs, and YLLs) for 27 diseases.

Results

We identified very weak and declining correlations (e.g., R2 < 0.03) between funding and the five measures of burden for the 27 diseases. The weak relationships persist even when HIV/AIDS is omitted (e.g., R2 < 0.1). A recent decline in the overall strengths of the funding burden relationships is attributable to novel investment in Alzheimer's disease research.

Conclusions

The weak correlations reveal long-standing inefficiencies in the NIH disease funding allocation process. The recent increased and focused funding for Alzheimer's disease may not be justified by an objective analysis which considers disease burdens. Increased efficiency of medical research may be realized by improving the poor match between disease burden and funding allocation.
{"title":"The persistence of very low correlations between NIH research funding and disease burdens","authors":"Ashley J.R. Carter,&nbsp;Milena Gevorkian","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100580","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100580","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The degree to which the allocation of disease-specific research funding by the NIH is proportional to disease burden is an important question. This study examined the historical relationship between NIH funding allocation and disease burden for a variety of medical conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Coefficients of relatedness for the linear relationships between funding and disease burden for 27 medical conditions over a period exceeding twenty years were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available data from 2009 to 2019, and previously published data from 1994 to 2004, was obtained to compare disease-specific research funding from the NIH to burden of disease values (mortality, prevalence, incidence, DALYs, and YLLs) for 27 diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified very weak and declining correlations (e.g., R<sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.03) between funding and the five measures of burden for the 27 diseases. The weak relationships persist even when HIV/AIDS is omitted (e.g., R<sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.1). A recent decline in the overall strengths of the funding burden relationships is attributable to novel investment in Alzheimer's disease research.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The weak correlations reveal long-standing inefficiencies in the NIH disease funding allocation process. The recent increased and focused funding for Alzheimer's disease may not be justified by an objective analysis which considers disease burdens. Increased efficiency of medical research may be realized by improving the poor match between disease burden and funding allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754078/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143029674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protecting the American dream for socially vulnerable families: An evaluation of state-level policies to improve housing security and protect mobile home communities
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100571
Morgan Clennin , Denise Hartsock , Olivia Goodman , Stacie Daugherty , Cheryl Kelly

Background

Manufactured and mobile homes are the largest source of unsubsidized affordable housing in the U.S. However, mobile home residents face unique challenges and are at greater risk of housing instability. State-level policies to enhance the regulation of mobile home parks and expand protections for residents are needed to address these challenges. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation process and impact of newly enacted mobile home park policies on the housing security of Colorado residents and to identify policy implementation hurdles and successes. Study Design: Policy implementation evaluation using mixed methods.

Methods

Ten mobile home parks in three small-to-medium sized communities in Colorado were invited to participate in the evaluation conducted between 2020 and 2022. The mixed methods policy implementation evaluation included cross-sectional surveys of mobile home park residents (n = 356), qualitative interviews with community advisory groups (n = 24), and focus groups with community residents (n = 12). Data were triangulated to identify themes related to policy implementation successes and challenges.

Results

Evaluation findings elevate mobile home park residents' lived experiences and summarize challenges related to implementation of Colorado's mobile home park policies. A substantial lag in policy implementation was observed. Notably, the infrastructure necessary to implement and monitor adherence to the new policies had to be developed. Among mobile home park residents, fear of retaliation from property owners, park management, and oversight agencies remained a significant barrier to policy effectiveness despite the new protections offered by the state-level policies.

Conclusions

Translation of policies into practice takes time and resources. Recommendations to enhance policy implementation are to ensure adequate allocation of inputs and resources to support implementation across multiple levels, including the infrastructure essential to monitor and enforce policy adherence, and educational materials paired with a strong communication plan to improve residents’ awareness and capacity to navigate the new policies.
{"title":"Protecting the American dream for socially vulnerable families: An evaluation of state-level policies to improve housing security and protect mobile home communities","authors":"Morgan Clennin ,&nbsp;Denise Hartsock ,&nbsp;Olivia Goodman ,&nbsp;Stacie Daugherty ,&nbsp;Cheryl Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100571","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100571","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Manufactured and mobile homes are the largest source of unsubsidized affordable housing in the U.S. However, mobile home residents face unique challenges and are at greater risk of housing instability. State-level policies to enhance the regulation of mobile home parks and expand protections for residents are needed to address these challenges. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation process and impact of newly enacted mobile home park policies on the housing security of Colorado residents and to identify policy implementation hurdles and successes. <u>Study Design</u>: Policy implementation evaluation using mixed methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten mobile home parks in three small-to-medium sized communities in Colorado were invited to participate in the evaluation conducted between 2020 and 2022. The mixed methods policy implementation evaluation included cross-sectional surveys of mobile home park residents (n = 356), qualitative interviews with community advisory groups (n = 24), and focus groups with community residents (n = 12). Data were triangulated to identify themes related to policy implementation successes and challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evaluation findings elevate mobile home park residents' lived experiences and summarize challenges related to implementation of Colorado's mobile home park policies. A substantial lag in policy implementation was observed. Notably, the infrastructure necessary to implement and monitor adherence to the new policies had to be developed. Among mobile home park residents, fear of retaliation from property owners, park management, and oversight agencies remained a significant barrier to policy effectiveness despite the new protections offered by the state-level policies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Translation of policies into practice takes time and resources. Recommendations to enhance policy implementation are to ensure adequate allocation of inputs and resources to support implementation across multiple levels, including the infrastructure essential to monitor and enforce policy adherence, and educational materials paired with a strong communication plan to improve residents’ awareness and capacity to navigate the new policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143351385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing and implementing whole systems approaches to reduce inequalities in childhood obesity: A mixed methods study in Dundee, Scotland 制定和实施减少儿童肥胖不平等的全系统方法:苏格兰邓迪的一项混合方法研究。
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100579
P. van der Graaf , M.P. Subramanian , J. Gillespie , A. Passey , N.R. Chng , A. Lake , H. Moore

Background

UK local authorities are developing and implementing Whole Systems Approaches to childhood obesity to tackle persistent and complex health inequalities. However, there is a lack of research on the practical application of these approaches. This paper reports on findings of a study into the initial implementation of this approach in Dundee, Scotland.

Study design/methods

We applied a mixed methods research design: 1) semi-structured interviews (n = 9) with partnership members; 2) training members as peer researchers to interview their wider networks; n = 17); 3) an online survey among wider stakeholders (n = 27); and 4) two action learning sets with decision makers. Interview data was analysed using thematic framework analysis and survey data was analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Dundee stakeholders stated that they had good knowledge of childhood obesity prevention efforts, but their engagement with working groups around identified priority themes was still limited, due to a lack of awareness about existing structures and knowledge about sustainable, impactful strategies, which were not always well-aligned between key organisations.

Conclusions

Our findings extend current literature on facilitators for Whole Systems Approaches in public health by highlighting that understanding of strategies and wider structures are crucial to build capacity and maintain engagement to address inequalities. We identified an ongoing need for targeted communication and diverse involvement opportunities for different stakeholder groups.
背景:英国地方当局正在制定和实施针对儿童肥胖的全系统方法,以解决持续和复杂的健康不平等问题。然而,对这些方法的实际应用研究不足。本文报告了在苏格兰邓迪初步实施这一方法的研究结果。研究设计/方法:我们采用混合方法研究设计:1)与合作伙伴进行半结构化访谈(n = 9);2)培训成员作为同行研究人员采访他们更广泛的网络;n = 17);3)在更广泛的利益相关者中进行在线调查(n = 27);4)有决策者的两个行动学习集。访谈数据采用专题框架分析,调查数据采用描述性统计分析。结果:邓迪利益相关者表示,他们对儿童肥胖预防工作有很好的了解,但由于缺乏对现有结构的认识,以及对可持续的、有影响力的战略的认识,他们与工作组围绕确定的优先主题的参与仍然有限,这些战略在关键组织之间并不总是很好地协调一致。结论:我们的研究结果扩展了目前关于公共卫生全系统方法促进者的文献,强调了对战略和更广泛结构的理解对于建立能力和保持参与解决不平等问题至关重要。我们确定了对不同利益相关者群体有针对性的沟通和多样化参与机会的持续需求。
{"title":"Developing and implementing whole systems approaches to reduce inequalities in childhood obesity: A mixed methods study in Dundee, Scotland","authors":"P. van der Graaf ,&nbsp;M.P. Subramanian ,&nbsp;J. Gillespie ,&nbsp;A. Passey ,&nbsp;N.R. Chng ,&nbsp;A. Lake ,&nbsp;H. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100579","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100579","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>UK local authorities are developing and implementing Whole Systems Approaches to childhood obesity to tackle persistent and complex health inequalities. However, there is a lack of research on the practical application of these approaches. This paper reports on findings of a study into the initial implementation of this approach in Dundee, Scotland.</div></div><div><h3>Study design/methods</h3><div>We applied a mixed methods research design: 1) semi-structured interviews (n = 9) with partnership members; 2) training members as peer researchers to interview their wider networks; n = 17); 3) an online survey among wider stakeholders (n = 27); and 4) two action learning sets with decision makers. Interview data was analysed using thematic framework analysis and survey data was analysed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dundee stakeholders stated that they had good knowledge of childhood obesity prevention efforts, but their engagement with working groups around identified priority themes was still limited, due to a lack of awareness about existing structures and knowledge about sustainable, impactful strategies, which were not always well-aligned between key organisations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings extend current literature on facilitators for Whole Systems Approaches in public health by highlighting that understanding of strategies and wider structures are crucial to build capacity and maintain engagement to address inequalities. We identified an ongoing need for targeted communication and diverse involvement opportunities for different stakeholder groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732220/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing health inequalities in disasters: A cross-sectional study of the viability of ‘vulnerability’ terminology and of priority lists in the UK
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100564
Poppy Ellis Logan , Gabriella Rundblad , Marian Brooke Rogers , Richard Amlôt , Gideon James Rubin

Background

In disasters, people with certain characteristics repeatedly experience health inequalities. In the UK, people predicted to experience poorer health outcomes are often described as ‘vulnerable’. Various services compile lists of ‘vulnerable’ people eligible for interventions in disasters to reduce health disparities.

Study aim

To explore the viability of current approaches to reducing health inequalities in disasters, we tested whether people typically described as ‘vulnerable’ by public health and emergency planners self-identify as 'vulnerable' in a disaster, and whether they are registered on a ‘vulnerability list’.

Study design

We collected data from 5148 UK-based adults using a cross-sectional online survey from July–September 2022, using nationally representative quotas for age, gender, disability, and social grade.

Methods

We calculated the proportions of respondents with perceived indicators of ‘vulnerability’ who self-described as 'vulnerable during a disaster’, and who reported being on a Priority Service Register or another ‘vulnerability list’. We used odds ratios to assess whether access to resources or risk mitigation plans explained low rates of self-identification as 'vulnerable' and registration.

Results

Among people with perceived indicators of 'vulnerability', self-description as ‘vulnerable in a disaster’ ranged from 22.4 % (of people dependent on false teeth) to 60.7 % (of people reporting significant difficulty running errands alone). Registration on a Priority Service Register ranged from 11.4 % (of people who were pregnant) to 35.7 % (of people reporting difficulties dressing, bathing, or using the toilet independently). Respondents without alternative plans or resources were generally no more likely to consider themselves ‘vulnerable’ or be registered on a 'vulnerability list' than those with alternative plans or resources.

Conclusions

Communications using the term 'vulnerable' may not reach target audiences. Using priority lists to reduce health disparities is impractical as most people facing inequitable risk are not registered. We suggest shifting UK terminology and discourse surrounding disaster risk, focussing on making mainstream strategies inclusive and accessible to reduce health inequalities in disasters.
{"title":"Reducing health inequalities in disasters: A cross-sectional study of the viability of ‘vulnerability’ terminology and of priority lists in the UK","authors":"Poppy Ellis Logan ,&nbsp;Gabriella Rundblad ,&nbsp;Marian Brooke Rogers ,&nbsp;Richard Amlôt ,&nbsp;Gideon James Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In disasters, people with certain characteristics repeatedly experience health inequalities. In the UK, people predicted to experience poorer health outcomes are often described as ‘vulnerable’. Various services compile lists of ‘vulnerable’ people eligible for interventions in disasters to reduce health disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Study aim</h3><div>To explore the viability of current approaches to reducing health inequalities in disasters, we tested whether people typically described as ‘vulnerable’ by public health and emergency planners self-identify as 'vulnerable' in a disaster, and whether they are registered on a ‘vulnerability list’.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We collected data from 5148 UK-based adults using a cross-sectional online survey from July–September 2022, using nationally representative quotas for age, gender, disability, and social grade.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We calculated the proportions of respondents with perceived indicators of ‘vulnerability’ who self-described as 'vulnerable during a disaster’, and who reported being on a Priority Service Register or another ‘vulnerability list’. We used odds ratios to assess whether access to resources or risk mitigation plans explained low rates of self-identification as 'vulnerable' and registration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among people with perceived indicators of 'vulnerability', self-description as ‘vulnerable in a disaster’ ranged from 22.4 % (of people dependent on false teeth) to 60.7 % (of people reporting significant difficulty running errands alone). Registration on a Priority Service Register ranged from 11.4 % (of people who were pregnant) to 35.7 % (of people reporting difficulties dressing, bathing, or using the toilet independently). Respondents without alternative plans or resources were generally no more likely to consider themselves ‘vulnerable’ or be registered on a 'vulnerability list' than those with alternative plans or resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Communications using the term 'vulnerable' may not reach target audiences. Using priority lists to reduce health disparities is impractical as most people facing inequitable risk are not registered. We suggest shifting UK terminology and discourse surrounding disaster risk, focussing on making mainstream strategies inclusive and accessible to reduce health inequalities in disasters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143093613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing vaccine hesitancy in the training of healthcare professionals: Insights from the VAX-TRUST project
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100569
Fábio Rafael Augusto , Cátia Sá Guerreiro , Rita Morais , Joana Mendonça , André Beja , Tiago Correia , Ana Patrícia Hilário

Background

Evidence suggests that healthcare professionals often feel uncomfortable discussing vaccination with patients, largely due to a lack of training on the topic. In line with the scientific evidence gathered from the VAX-TRUST project, it is crucial to invest in training healthcare professionals and developing political measures to effectively address vaccine hesitancy. This paper explores the importance of training healthcare professionals to address vaccine hesitancy and provides concrete strategies for its implementation.

Study design

A quantitative research design was used.

Methods

The findings are based on a comprehensive Delphi survey conducted with a panel of 112 experts. Additionally, the study involved practical interventions carried out across seven European countries, engaging a total of 694 participants. These participants included general practitioners (GPs), paediatricians, nurses, as well as medical and nursing students. This robust and diverse dataset provides a well-rounded perspective on the subject matter, ensuring that the insights gained are both extensive and representative of various healthcare professionals across Europe.

Results

Three key themes emerged from the findings: the need for effective strategies to address communication challenges with vaccine-hesitant individuals, the importance of using evidence-based communication practices to improve these interactions, and the necessity of integrating social scientific knowledge on vaccination into the training of healthcare professionals.

Conclusions

Training healthcare professionals is essential to equip them with skills and knowledge needed to deal with the complexities of vaccine hesitancy. Evidence was gathered on ways to reflect and act to develop this capacity, namely, by increasing the ability to communicate empathetically, responding to patients' concerns with evidence-based information, and to building stronger and more collaborative relationships with them.
{"title":"Addressing vaccine hesitancy in the training of healthcare professionals: Insights from the VAX-TRUST project","authors":"Fábio Rafael Augusto ,&nbsp;Cátia Sá Guerreiro ,&nbsp;Rita Morais ,&nbsp;Joana Mendonça ,&nbsp;André Beja ,&nbsp;Tiago Correia ,&nbsp;Ana Patrícia Hilário","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100569","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100569","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence suggests that healthcare professionals often feel uncomfortable discussing vaccination with patients, largely due to a lack of training on the topic. In line with the scientific evidence gathered from the VAX-TRUST project, it is crucial to invest in training healthcare professionals and developing political measures to effectively address vaccine hesitancy. This paper explores the importance of training healthcare professionals to address vaccine hesitancy and provides concrete strategies for its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A quantitative research design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The findings are based on a comprehensive Delphi survey conducted with a panel of 112 experts. Additionally, the study involved practical interventions carried out across seven European countries, engaging a total of 694 participants. These participants included general practitioners (GPs), paediatricians, nurses, as well as medical and nursing students. This robust and diverse dataset provides a well-rounded perspective on the subject matter, ensuring that the insights gained are both extensive and representative of various healthcare professionals across Europe.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three key themes emerged from the findings: the need for effective strategies to address communication challenges with vaccine-hesitant individuals, the importance of using evidence-based communication practices to improve these interactions, and the necessity of integrating social scientific knowledge on vaccination into the training of healthcare professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Training healthcare professionals is essential to equip them with skills and knowledge needed to deal with the complexities of vaccine hesitancy. Evidence was gathered on ways to reflect and act to develop this capacity, namely, by increasing the ability to communicate empathetically, responding to patients' concerns with evidence-based information, and to building stronger and more collaborative relationships with them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143060752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vaping guidance and women's decision-making during pregnancy & postpartum
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100570
Greaves L , Brabete A.C. , Poole N. , Huber E. , Stinson J.

Background

Vaping during pregnancy remains under researched and under reported, making appropriate prevention, health promotion and intervention difficult to design and mount. In this article we assessed the experiences and considerations of women who vape during pregnancy and/or within 2 years post-partum, in order to underpin realistic and informative health information for women and providers in face of conflicting and minimal guidance.

Design

22 interviews were conducted with pregnant and post-partum women who vape(d) nicotine, cannabis, or both during pregnancy and/or after delivery.

Methods

Participants who were pregnant or postpartum were recruited via social media and interviews conducted on Zoom or by telephone, recorded and transcribed. Data were coded in NVivo 12 and analyzed using a combined deductive and inductive approach, and principles of abductive analysis were applied to the data.

Results

Three overarching themes related to decision making about vaping are described: women's agency in information seeking, approaches to assessing information, and ambivalence regarding vaping practices. Women looked for information on the health effects of vaping during pregnancy and made differing decisions in the context of limited research and guidance. At times, family, friends, partners, and internet resources influenced their decisions. Some women dealt with ambivalence by vaping only in private, while alone, and at home or as a convenience. The women were uniformly aware of societal judgement regarding pregnancy and substance use in general and feared being addressed by friends or strangers about vaping.

Conclusion

In the absence of definitive research and unambiguous clinical guidance, the women felt limited in finding accurate advice, but demonstrated agency in information seeking and assessment. Nonetheless, they also recounted their ambivalence regarding their vaping decisions and practices. We created varied knowledge information products to fill this void.
{"title":"Vaping guidance and women's decision-making during pregnancy & postpartum","authors":"Greaves L ,&nbsp;Brabete A.C. ,&nbsp;Poole N. ,&nbsp;Huber E. ,&nbsp;Stinson J.","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaping during pregnancy remains under researched and under reported, making appropriate prevention, health promotion and intervention difficult to design and mount. In this article we assessed the experiences and considerations of women who vape during pregnancy and/or within 2 years post-partum, in order to underpin realistic and informative health information for women and providers in face of conflicting and minimal guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>22 interviews were conducted with pregnant and post-partum women who vape(d) nicotine, cannabis, or both during pregnancy and/or after delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants who were pregnant or postpartum were recruited via social media and interviews conducted on Zoom or by telephone, recorded and transcribed. Data were coded in NVivo 12 and analyzed using a combined deductive and inductive approach, and principles of abductive analysis were applied to the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three overarching themes related to decision making about vaping are described: women's agency in information seeking, approaches to assessing information, and ambivalence regarding vaping practices. Women looked for information on the health effects of vaping during pregnancy and made differing decisions in the context of limited research and guidance. At times, family, friends, partners, and internet resources influenced their decisions. Some women dealt with ambivalence by vaping only in private, while alone, and at home or as a convenience. The women were uniformly aware of societal judgement regarding pregnancy and substance use in general and feared being addressed by friends or strangers about vaping.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the absence of definitive research and unambiguous clinical guidance, the women felt limited in finding accurate advice, but demonstrated agency in information seeking and assessment. Nonetheless, they also recounted their ambivalence regarding their vaping decisions and practices. We created varied knowledge information products to fill this void.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772963/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143060797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers and drivers influencing people's behaviour towards COVID-19 public health and social measures in the Netherlands 在荷兰,影响人们对 COVID-19 公共卫生和社会措施行为的障碍和驱动因素。
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100566
Valérie Eijrond , Nora Bünemann , Nicky Renna , Brett Craig , Katrine Bach Habersaat , Hélène Voeten , Pearl Dykstra , Anja Schreijer

Background

The disease burden of COVID-19 infection, morbidity, and mortality was unevenly distributed across different population subgroups. A one-size-fits-all approach may not reach all groups. Identifying barriers and drivers that influence behaviour towards COVID-19 public health and social measures (PHSM) is an important step when designing tailored interventions. Using the WHO Tailoring Health Programmes (THP) approach, we performed a situation analysis. The objectives were to identify population subgroups; gain an overview of barriers and drivers to COVID-19 PHSM among subgroups; and interventions and research initiated in the Netherlands.

Study design

A literature scan, interviews and a meeting with experts were held.

Methods

Results were categorised according to the capability, opportunity, and motivation to understand COVID-19 PHSM behaviour.

Results

Different population subgroups have been studied regarding their barriers and drivers for uptake and adherence to COVID-19 PHSM, such as (older) migrant communities. Barriers include language barriers, mis- and disinformation and distrust. Drivers include protecting others and oneself. Network ties play a role, as a barrier and driver. Forty-five interventions and research projects were identified. Several revealed the importance of involving key figures. A lack of monitoring and evaluation of interventions during the pandemic was acknowledged by experts.

Conclusions

The situation analysis reveals that knowledge of the most prevalent barriers and drivers between underserved groups and how to address them with targeted (cost) effective interventions is lacking. With this THP project we aim to develop new or improve existing interventions addressing behaviours towards PHSM among a prioritised population group informed by evidence-based behavioural insights.
背景:COVID-19感染的疾病负担、发病率和死亡率在不同人群亚组中分布不均匀。一种放之四海而皆准的方法可能无法适用于所有群体。确定影响采取COVID-19公共卫生和社会措施的行为的障碍和驱动因素,是设计量身定制干预措施的重要步骤。使用世卫组织定制卫生规划(THP)方法,我们进行了情况分析。目的是确定人口分组;概述各子群体中COVID-19初级卫生保健预防的障碍和驱动因素;以及在荷兰发起的干预和研究。研究设计:进行文献扫描、访谈和专家会议。方法:根据了解COVID-19 PHSM行为的能力、机会和动机对结果进行分类。结果:研究了不同人群亚组接受和坚持COVID-19 PHSM的障碍和驱动因素,例如(老年)移民社区。障碍包括语言障碍、错误和虚假信息以及不信任。司机包括保护他人和自己。网络纽带发挥作用,既是障碍,又是驱动。确定了45个干预措施和研究项目。有几次会议揭示了关键人物参与的重要性。专家们承认,在大流行期间缺乏对干预措施的监测和评价。结论:情况分析表明,缺乏对服务不足群体之间最普遍的障碍和驱动因素的了解,以及如何通过有针对性的(成本)有效的干预措施来解决这些障碍和驱动因素。在这个THP项目中,我们的目标是开发新的或改进现有的干预措施,通过基于证据的行为见解,在优先人群中解决针对PHSM的行为。
{"title":"Barriers and drivers influencing people's behaviour towards COVID-19 public health and social measures in the Netherlands","authors":"Valérie Eijrond ,&nbsp;Nora Bünemann ,&nbsp;Nicky Renna ,&nbsp;Brett Craig ,&nbsp;Katrine Bach Habersaat ,&nbsp;Hélène Voeten ,&nbsp;Pearl Dykstra ,&nbsp;Anja Schreijer","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The disease burden of COVID-19 infection, morbidity, and mortality was unevenly distributed across different population subgroups. A one-size-fits-all approach may not reach all groups. Identifying barriers and drivers that influence behaviour towards COVID-19 public health and social measures (PHSM) is an important step when designing tailored interventions. Using the WHO Tailoring Health Programmes (THP) approach, we performed a situation analysis. The objectives were to identify population subgroups; gain an overview of barriers and drivers to COVID-19 PHSM among subgroups; and interventions and research initiated in the Netherlands.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A literature scan, interviews and a meeting with experts were held.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Results were categorised according to the capability, opportunity, and motivation to understand COVID-19 PHSM behaviour.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Different population subgroups have been studied regarding their barriers and drivers for uptake and adherence to COVID-19 PHSM, such as (older) migrant communities. Barriers include language barriers, mis- and disinformation and distrust. Drivers include protecting others and oneself. Network ties play a role, as a barrier and driver. Forty-five interventions and research projects were identified. Several revealed the importance of involving key figures. A lack of monitoring and evaluation of interventions during the pandemic was acknowledged by experts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The situation analysis reveals that knowledge of the most prevalent barriers and drivers between underserved groups and how to address them with targeted (cost) effective interventions is lacking. With this THP project we aim to develop new or improve existing interventions addressing behaviours towards PHSM among a prioritised population group informed by evidence-based behavioural insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732217/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of workplace violence on healthcare workers during and after the COVID-19 outbreak
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100572
C. Mento , G. Pandolfo , G. Spatari , M.C. Silvestri , I. Formica , A. Bruno , G. Falgares , M.R.A. Muscatello , C. La Barbiera , A. De Carlo
The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified workplace violence (WPV) against healthcare workers, exposing them to unprecedented levels of aggression. Incidents of verbal abuse, threats, and physical assaults have increased, especially in high-stress environments such as emergency departments and intensive care units, exacerbating psychological challenges for healthcare staff. This commentary explores the profound impact of WPV on healthcare workers' mental health and job satisfaction. Dehumanization - treating healthcare workers as resources rather than individuals - is a key factor that fuels aggression and undermines empathy within healthcare settings. WPV not only affects the personal well-being of healthcare professionals but also compromises patient care quality and the efficiency of healthcare systems. Effective strategies are urgently needed to address WPV, such as comprehensive training in de-escalation techniques, organizational policies, and enhanced safety protocols. An integrated approach that combines psychological support, policy reform, and preventive measures is essential to ensure a safer and more resilient healthcare environment for the future.
{"title":"The impact of workplace violence on healthcare workers during and after the COVID-19 outbreak","authors":"C. Mento ,&nbsp;G. Pandolfo ,&nbsp;G. Spatari ,&nbsp;M.C. Silvestri ,&nbsp;I. Formica ,&nbsp;A. Bruno ,&nbsp;G. Falgares ,&nbsp;M.R.A. Muscatello ,&nbsp;C. La Barbiera ,&nbsp;A. De Carlo","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100572","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100572","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified workplace violence (WPV) against healthcare workers, exposing them to unprecedented levels of aggression. Incidents of verbal abuse, threats, and physical assaults have increased, especially in high-stress environments such as emergency departments and intensive care units, exacerbating psychological challenges for healthcare staff. This commentary explores the profound impact of WPV on healthcare workers' mental health and job satisfaction. Dehumanization - treating healthcare workers as resources rather than individuals - is a key factor that fuels aggression and undermines empathy within healthcare settings. WPV not only affects the personal well-being of healthcare professionals but also compromises patient care quality and the efficiency of healthcare systems. Effective strategies are urgently needed to address WPV, such as comprehensive training in de-escalation techniques, organizational policies, and enhanced safety protocols. An integrated approach that combines psychological support, policy reform, and preventive measures is essential to ensure a safer and more resilient healthcare environment for the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143029670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Socioeconomic/health-related factors associated with HPV vaccination initiation/completion among females of paediatric age: A systematic review with meta-analysis 与儿童期女性HPV疫苗接种开始/完成相关的社会经济/健康相关因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100562
George N. Okoli , Alexandra Grossman Moon , Alexandra E. Soos , Christine J. Neilson , Hannah Kimmel Supron , Katharine Etsell , Avneet Grewal , Paul Van Caeseele , Caroline Richardson , Diane M. Harper

Objectives

To systematically identify, appraise, and summarise published evidence on individual socioeconomic and health-related factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination initiation and completion among females of paediatric age.

Study design

A global systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42023445721).

Methods

We performed a literature search in December 2022 and supplemented the search on August 1, 2023. Appropriate data were pooled using an inverse variance, random-effects model and the results were expressed as odds ratios, with 95 % confidence intervals. A statistically significant point pooled increased/decreased odds of 30–69 % was regarded to be strongly associated, and ≥70 % was very strongly associated.

Results

We included 83 cross-sectional studies. Among several significantly associated factors, being an older girl: 1.67 (1.44–1.93), having health insurance: 1.41 (1.16–1.72), and being in a public school: 1.54 (1.05–2.26) strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation, and nativity in the country of study: 1.82 (1.33–2.50), use of contraception: 2.00 (1.16–3.46), receipt of influenza vaccination: 1.75 (1.54–2.00) and having visited a healthcare provider: 1.85 (1.51–2.28) in the preceding year very strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation. Likewise, being an older girl: 1.36 (1.23–1.49) and having visited a healthcare provider in the preceding year: 1.46 (1.05–2.04) strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion, and school-based vaccination: 3.08 (1.05–9.07), having health insurance: 1.72 (1.27–2.33), and receipt of influenza vaccination in the preceding year: 1.72 (1.62–1.83) very strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion. We made similar observations when the studies were limited to the United States.

Conclusions

Several individual socioeconomic/health-related factors may determine initiating and completing the HPV vaccination series among paediatric females. These factors provide insights that may be key to identifying girls at increased risk of not being vaccinated and may aid targeted public health messaging.
目的:系统地识别、评估和总结已发表的证据,这些证据表明个体社会经济和健康相关因素与儿科年龄女性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的开始和完成相关。研究设计:一项全球系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO: CRD42023445721)。方法:于2022年12月进行文献检索,并于2023年8月1日进行补充检索。采用反方差随机效应模型合并适当的数据,结果用比值比表示,置信区间为95%。有统计学意义的点池增加/减少的几率为30- 69%被认为是强相关,≥70%被认为是非常强相关。结果:我们纳入了83项横断面研究。在几个显著相关的因素中,年龄较大的女孩:1.67(1.44-1.93),有健康保险:1.41(1.16-1.72),在公立学校:1.54(1.05-2.26)大大增加了接种疫苗的几率,在研究国出生:1.82(1.33-2.50),使用避孕措施:2.00(1.16-3.46),接种流感疫苗:1.75(1.54-2.00),并访问过医疗保健提供者。前一年的1.85(1.51-2.28)非常强烈地增加了接种疫苗的几率。同样,年龄较大的女孩:1.36(1.23-1.49),前一年访问过保健提供者:1.46(1.05-2.04),大大增加了完成一系列疫苗接种的几率,学校疫苗接种:3.08(1.05-9.07),有健康保险:1.72(1.27-2.33),前一年接受流感疫苗接种:1.72(1.62-1.83),大大增加了完成一系列疫苗接种的几率。当研究仅限于美国时,我们也做了类似的观察。结论:几个个体社会经济/健康相关因素可能决定了儿科女性开始和完成HPV疫苗接种系列。这些因素提供的见解可能是确定未接种疫苗风险增加的女孩的关键,并可能有助于有针对性的公共卫生信息传递。
{"title":"Socioeconomic/health-related factors associated with HPV vaccination initiation/completion among females of paediatric age: A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"George N. Okoli ,&nbsp;Alexandra Grossman Moon ,&nbsp;Alexandra E. Soos ,&nbsp;Christine J. Neilson ,&nbsp;Hannah Kimmel Supron ,&nbsp;Katharine Etsell ,&nbsp;Avneet Grewal ,&nbsp;Paul Van Caeseele ,&nbsp;Caroline Richardson ,&nbsp;Diane M. Harper","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100562","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically identify, appraise, and summarise published evidence on individual socioeconomic and health-related factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination initiation and completion among females of paediatric age.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A global systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42023445721).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a literature search in December 2022 and supplemented the search on August 1, 2023. Appropriate data were pooled using an inverse variance, random-effects model and the results were expressed as odds ratios, with 95 % confidence intervals. A statistically significant point pooled increased/decreased odds of 30–69 % was regarded to be strongly associated, and ≥70 % was very strongly associated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 83 cross-sectional studies. Among several significantly associated factors, being an older girl: 1.67 (1.44–1.93), having health insurance: 1.41 (1.16–1.72), and being in a public school: 1.54 (1.05–2.26) strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation, and nativity in the country of study: 1.82 (1.33–2.50), use of contraception: 2.00 (1.16–3.46), receipt of influenza vaccination: 1.75 (1.54–2.00) and having visited a healthcare provider: 1.85 (1.51–2.28) in the preceding year very strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation. Likewise, being an older girl: 1.36 (1.23–1.49) and having visited a healthcare provider in the preceding year: 1.46 (1.05–2.04) strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion, and school-based vaccination: 3.08 (1.05–9.07), having health insurance: 1.72 (1.27–2.33), and receipt of influenza vaccination in the preceding year: 1.72 (1.62–1.83) very strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion. We made similar observations when the studies were limited to the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Several individual socioeconomic/health-related factors may determine initiating and completing the HPV vaccination series among paediatric females. These factors provide insights that may be key to identifying girls at increased risk of not being vaccinated and may aid targeted public health messaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721234/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Public Health in Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1