首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Healthy Longevity最新文献

英文 中文
The time course of motor and cognitive decline in older adults and their associations with brain pathologies: a multicohort study 老年人运动能力和认知能力下降的时间过程及其与脑部病变的关系:一项多队列研究
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00033-3
Shahram Oveisgharan MD , Tianhao Wang PhD , Lisa L Barnes PhD , Julie A Schneider MD , David A Bennett MD , Aron S Buchman MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many studies have reported that impaired gait precedes cognitive impairment in older people. We aimed to characterise the time course of cognitive and motor decline in older individuals and the association of these declines with the pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This multicohort study used data from three community-based cohort studies (Religious Orders Study, Rush Memory and Aging Project, and Minority Aging Research Study, all in the USA). The inclusion criteria for all three cohorts were no clinical dementia at the time of enrolment and consent to annual clinical assessments. Eligible participants consented to post-mortem brain donation and had post-mortem pathological assessments and three or more repeated annual measures of cognition and motor functions. Clinical and post-mortem data were analysed using functional mixed-effects models. Global cognition was based on 19 neuropsychological tests, a hand strength score was based on grip and pinch strength, and a gait score was based on the number of steps and time to walk 8 feet and turn 360°. Brain pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias were assessed at autopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>From 1994 to 2022, there were 1570 eligible cohort participants aged 65 years or older, 1303 of whom had cognitive and motor measurements and were included in the analysis. Mean age at death was 90·3 years (SD 6·3), 905 (69%) participants were female, and 398 (31%) were male. Median follow-up time was 9 years (IQR 5–11). On average, cognition was stable from 25 to 15 years before death, when cognition began to decline. By contrast, gait function and hand strength declined during the entire study. The combinations of pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias associated with cognitive and motor decline and their onsets of associations varied; only tau tangles, Parkinson's disease pathology, and macroinfarcts were associated with decline of all three phenotypes. Tau tangles were significantly associated with cognitive decline, gait function decline, and hand function decline (p<0·0001 for each); however, the association with cognitive decline persisted for more than 11 years before death, but the association with hand strength only began 3·57 years before death and the association with gait began 3·49 years before death. By contrast, the association of macroinfarcts with declining gait function began 9·25 years before death (p<0·0001) compared with 6·65 years before death (p=0·0005) for cognitive decline and 2·66 years before death (p=0·024) for decline in hand strength.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Our findings suggest that average motor decline in older adults precedes cognitive decline. Macroinfarcts but not tau tangles are associated with declining gait function that precedes cognitive decline. This suggests the need for further studies to test if gait impairment is
背景许多研究报告称,老年人的步态受损先于认知功能受损。我们的目的是描述老年人认知和运动能力下降的时间过程,以及这些下降与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的病理变化之间的联系。方法这项多队列研究使用了三项基于社区的队列研究(均在美国进行的宗教命令研究、拉什记忆与老龄化项目和少数族裔老龄化研究)的数据。这三项队列研究的纳入标准都是在入选时没有临床痴呆症,并同意每年进行临床评估。符合条件的参与者同意捐赠死后大脑,并接受死后病理评估和三次或三次以上的认知和运动功能年度重复测量。临床和尸检数据采用功能混合效应模型进行分析。总体认知能力基于19项神经心理学测试,手部力量评分基于握力和捏力,步态评分基于步行8英尺和360°转身的步数和时间。研究结果从 1994 年到 2022 年,共有 1570 名年龄在 65 岁或以上的符合条件的队列参与者,其中 1303 人进行了认知和运动测量并纳入分析。死亡时的平均年龄为 90-3 岁(SD 6-3),其中 905 人(69%)为女性,398 人(31%)为男性。随访时间中位数为 9 年(IQR 5-11)。平均而言,认知能力在死亡前的 25 到 15 年间保持稳定,之后认知能力开始下降。相比之下,步态功能和手部力量在整个研究期间都在下降。与认知能力和运动能力下降相关的阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症病理组合及其关联的起始时间各不相同;只有陶粒缠结、帕金森病病理和大梗死与所有三种表型的下降相关。Tau 蛋白结节与认知能力下降、步态功能下降和手部功能下降有明显的相关性(p<0-0001);然而,与认知能力下降的相关性在死亡前持续了11年以上,但与手部力量的相关性在死亡前3-57年才开始,与步态的相关性在死亡前3-49年才开始。相比之下,大面积脑梗塞与步态功能下降的关系始于死前9-25年(p<0-0001),而认知功能下降与步态功能下降的关系始于死前6-65年(p=0-0005),手部力量下降与步态功能下降的关系始于死前2-66年(p=0-024)。大梗死与认知功能衰退之前的步态功能衰退有关,但与 tau 蛋白缠结无关。这表明有必要进行进一步的研究,以检验步态障碍是否是临床前血管性认知障碍的临床代表。
{"title":"The time course of motor and cognitive decline in older adults and their associations with brain pathologies: a multicohort study","authors":"Shahram Oveisgharan MD ,&nbsp;Tianhao Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa L Barnes PhD ,&nbsp;Julie A Schneider MD ,&nbsp;David A Bennett MD ,&nbsp;Aron S Buchman MD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00033-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00033-3","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many studies have reported that impaired gait precedes cognitive impairment in older people. We aimed to characterise the time course of cognitive and motor decline in older individuals and the association of these declines with the pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This multicohort study used data from three community-based cohort studies (Religious Orders Study, Rush Memory and Aging Project, and Minority Aging Research Study, all in the USA). The inclusion criteria for all three cohorts were no clinical dementia at the time of enrolment and consent to annual clinical assessments. Eligible participants consented to post-mortem brain donation and had post-mortem pathological assessments and three or more repeated annual measures of cognition and motor functions. Clinical and post-mortem data were analysed using functional mixed-effects models. Global cognition was based on 19 neuropsychological tests, a hand strength score was based on grip and pinch strength, and a gait score was based on the number of steps and time to walk 8 feet and turn 360°. Brain pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias were assessed at autopsy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;From 1994 to 2022, there were 1570 eligible cohort participants aged 65 years or older, 1303 of whom had cognitive and motor measurements and were included in the analysis. Mean age at death was 90·3 years (SD 6·3), 905 (69%) participants were female, and 398 (31%) were male. Median follow-up time was 9 years (IQR 5–11). On average, cognition was stable from 25 to 15 years before death, when cognition began to decline. By contrast, gait function and hand strength declined during the entire study. The combinations of pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias associated with cognitive and motor decline and their onsets of associations varied; only tau tangles, Parkinson's disease pathology, and macroinfarcts were associated with decline of all three phenotypes. Tau tangles were significantly associated with cognitive decline, gait function decline, and hand function decline (p&lt;0·0001 for each); however, the association with cognitive decline persisted for more than 11 years before death, but the association with hand strength only began 3·57 years before death and the association with gait began 3·49 years before death. By contrast, the association of macroinfarcts with declining gait function began 9·25 years before death (p&lt;0·0001) compared with 6·65 years before death (p=0·0005) for cognitive decline and 2·66 years before death (p=0·024) for decline in hand strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our findings suggest that average motor decline in older adults precedes cognitive decline. Macroinfarcts but not tau tangles are associated with declining gait function that precedes cognitive decline. This suggests the need for further studies to test if gait impairment is ","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e336-e345"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000333/pdfft?md5=e34bd8bbc108b19f2ab62d243ea22f5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000333-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
10-h time-restricted eating: are there broad health benefits? 10小时限时进食:对健康有广泛益处吗?
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00045-X
Wanyang Li , Wei Chen
{"title":"10-h time-restricted eating: are there broad health benefits?","authors":"Wanyang Li ,&nbsp;Wei Chen","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00045-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00045-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e304-e305"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400045X/pdfft?md5=b61f07f903018eb2edeeb00eb8632054&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400045X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social health and cognition: the mediating role of depression and inflammation 社会健康与认知:抑郁和炎症的中介作用
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00065-5
Shian Ming Tan, Iris Rawtaer
{"title":"Social health and cognition: the mediating role of depression and inflammation","authors":"Shian Ming Tan,&nbsp;Iris Rawtaer","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00065-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00065-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e312-e313"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000655/pdfft?md5=5777a608919fd6e5ddc427b2134b1190&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000655-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of 3 months of 10-h per-day time-restricted eating and 3 months of follow-up on bodyweight and cardiometabolic health in Danish individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes: the RESET single-centre, parallel, superiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial 每天 10 小时限时进食 3 个月和 3 个月随访对丹麦 2 型糖尿病高危人群体重和心脏代谢健康的影响:RESET 单中心、平行、优越性、开放标签随机对照试验
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00028-X
Jonas Salling Quist PhD , Hanne Enghoff Pedersen PhD , Marie Møller Jensen PhD , Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen PhD , Natasja Bjerre PhD , Trine Spragge Ekblond MSc , Sarah Uldal MD , Joachim Størling PhD , Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen PhD , Prof Jens Juul Holst DMSc , Prof Signe Sørensen Torekov PhD , Martin Erik Nyeland PhD , Dorte Vistisen PhD , Prof Marit Eika Jørgensen PhD , Prof Satchidananda Panda PhD , Prof Christina Brock PhD , Prof Graham Finlayson PhD , Martin Bæk Blond PhD , Kristine Færch PhD
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Time-restricted eating (TRE) has been suggested to be a simple, feasible, and effective dietary strategy for individuals with overweight or obesity. We aimed to investigate the effects of 3 months of 10-h per-day TRE and 3 months of follow-up on bodyweight and cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a single-centre, parallel, superiority, open-label randomised controlled clinical trial conducted at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (Denmark). The inclusion criteria were age 30–70 years with either overweight (ie, BMI ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and concomitant prediabetes (ie, glycated haemoglobin [HbA<sub>1c</sub>] 39–47 mmol/mol) or obesity (ie, BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with or without prediabetes and a habitual self-reported eating window (eating and drinking [except for water]) of 12 h per day or more every day and of 14 h per day or more at least 1 day per week. Individuals were randomly assigned 1:1 to 3 months of habitual living (hereafter referred to as the control group) or TRE, which was a self-selected 10-h per-day eating window placed between 0600 h and 2000 h. Randomisation was done in blocks varying in size and was open for participants and research staff, but outcome assessors were masked during statistical analyses. The randomisation list was generated by an external statistician. The primary outcome was change in bodyweight, assessed after 3 months (12 weeks) of the intervention and after 3 months (13 weeks) of follow-up. Adverse events were reported and registered at study visits or if participants contacted study staff to report events between visits. This trial is registered on <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (<span>NCT03854656</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between March 12, 2019, and March 2, 2022, 100 participants (66 [66%] were female and 34 [34%] were male; median age 59 years [IQR 52–65]) were enrolled and randomly assigned (50 to each group). Of those 100, 46 (92%) in the TRE group and 46 (92%) in the control group completed the intervention period. After 3 months of the intervention, there was no difference in bodyweight between the TRE group and the control group (–0·8 kg, 95% CI –1·7 to 0·2; p=0·099). Being in the TRE group was not associated with a lower bodyweight compared with the control group after subsequent 3-month follow-up (–0·2 kg, –1·6 to 1·2). In the per-protocol analysis, participants who completed the intervention in the TRE group lost 1·0 kg (–1·9 to –0·0; p=0·040) bodyweight compared with the control group after 3 months of intervention, which was not maintained after the 3-month follow-up period (–0·4 kg, –1·8 to 1·0). During the trial and follow-up period, one participant in the TRE group reported a severe adverse event: development of a subcutaneous nodule and pain when the arm was in use. This side-effect was evaluated to be related to the
背景限时进食(TRE)被认为是针对超重或肥胖患者的一种简单、可行且有效的饮食策略。我们的目的是调查 3 个月每天 10 小时的限时进食和 3 个月的随访对 2 型糖尿病高危人群的体重和心脏代谢风险因素的影响。方法这是在哥本哈根斯泰诺糖尿病中心(丹麦)进行的一项单中心、平行、优势、开放标签随机对照临床试验。纳入标准为:年龄在30-70岁之间,体重超重(即体重指数≥25 kg/m2)并伴有糖尿病前期(即糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c] 39-47 mmol/mol),或肥胖(即体重指数≥30 kg/m2)伴有或不伴有糖尿病前期,自我报告的习惯性进食时间(进食和饮水[水除外])为每天12小时或以上,每周至少有一天为14小时或以上。参与者按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到 3 个月的习惯生活组(以下简称对照组)或 TRE 组,TRE 组是在 6 点至 20 点之间自我选择的每天 10 小时的进食时间段。随机列表由外部统计人员生成。主要结果是体重变化,在干预3个月(12周)后和随访3个月(13周)后进行评估。不良事件在研究访问时报告和登记,或者参与者在访问间隙联系研究人员报告不良事件。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03854656) 上注册。研究结果在 2019 年 3 月 12 日至 2022 年 3 月 2 日期间,100 名参与者(66 [66%] 人为女性,34 [34%] 人为男性;中位年龄 59 岁 [IQR 52-65])被注册并随机分配(每组 50 人)。在这 100 人中,有 46 人(92%)在 TRE 组完成了干预,46 人(92%)在对照组完成了干预。干预 3 个月后,TRE 组和对照组的体重没有差异(-0-8 千克,95% CI -1-7 至 0-2;P=0-099)。在随后 3 个月的随访中,TRE 组的体重与对照组相比也没有降低(-0-2 千克,-1-6 至 1-2)。在按协议分析中,与对照组相比,完成 TRE 组干预的参与者在 3 个月的干预后体重减轻了 1-0 公斤(-1-9 至 -0-0;P=0-040),但在 3 个月的随访期后体重并未保持不变(-0-4 公斤,-1-8 至 1-0)。在试验和随访期间,TRE 组的一名参与者报告了一起严重的不良事件:使用手臂时出现皮下结节和疼痛。经评估,该副作用与试验程序有关。解释3个月的每天10小时TRE不会对2型糖尿病高风险中老年人的体重产生临床相关影响。
{"title":"Effects of 3 months of 10-h per-day time-restricted eating and 3 months of follow-up on bodyweight and cardiometabolic health in Danish individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes: the RESET single-centre, parallel, superiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Jonas Salling Quist PhD ,&nbsp;Hanne Enghoff Pedersen PhD ,&nbsp;Marie Møller Jensen PhD ,&nbsp;Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen PhD ,&nbsp;Natasja Bjerre PhD ,&nbsp;Trine Spragge Ekblond MSc ,&nbsp;Sarah Uldal MD ,&nbsp;Joachim Størling PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jens Juul Holst DMSc ,&nbsp;Prof Signe Sørensen Torekov PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Erik Nyeland PhD ,&nbsp;Dorte Vistisen PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Marit Eika Jørgensen PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Satchidananda Panda PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Christina Brock PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Graham Finlayson PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Bæk Blond PhD ,&nbsp;Kristine Færch PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00028-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00028-X","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Time-restricted eating (TRE) has been suggested to be a simple, feasible, and effective dietary strategy for individuals with overweight or obesity. We aimed to investigate the effects of 3 months of 10-h per-day TRE and 3 months of follow-up on bodyweight and cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This was a single-centre, parallel, superiority, open-label randomised controlled clinical trial conducted at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (Denmark). The inclusion criteria were age 30–70 years with either overweight (ie, BMI ≥25 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and concomitant prediabetes (ie, glycated haemoglobin [HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt;] 39–47 mmol/mol) or obesity (ie, BMI ≥30 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) with or without prediabetes and a habitual self-reported eating window (eating and drinking [except for water]) of 12 h per day or more every day and of 14 h per day or more at least 1 day per week. Individuals were randomly assigned 1:1 to 3 months of habitual living (hereafter referred to as the control group) or TRE, which was a self-selected 10-h per-day eating window placed between 0600 h and 2000 h. Randomisation was done in blocks varying in size and was open for participants and research staff, but outcome assessors were masked during statistical analyses. The randomisation list was generated by an external statistician. The primary outcome was change in bodyweight, assessed after 3 months (12 weeks) of the intervention and after 3 months (13 weeks) of follow-up. Adverse events were reported and registered at study visits or if participants contacted study staff to report events between visits. This trial is registered on &lt;span&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt; (&lt;span&gt;NCT03854656&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Between March 12, 2019, and March 2, 2022, 100 participants (66 [66%] were female and 34 [34%] were male; median age 59 years [IQR 52–65]) were enrolled and randomly assigned (50 to each group). Of those 100, 46 (92%) in the TRE group and 46 (92%) in the control group completed the intervention period. After 3 months of the intervention, there was no difference in bodyweight between the TRE group and the control group (–0·8 kg, 95% CI –1·7 to 0·2; p=0·099). Being in the TRE group was not associated with a lower bodyweight compared with the control group after subsequent 3-month follow-up (–0·2 kg, –1·6 to 1·2). In the per-protocol analysis, participants who completed the intervention in the TRE group lost 1·0 kg (–1·9 to –0·0; p=0·040) bodyweight compared with the control group after 3 months of intervention, which was not maintained after the 3-month follow-up period (–0·4 kg, –1·8 to 1·0). During the trial and follow-up period, one participant in the TRE group reported a severe adverse event: development of a subcutaneous nodule and pain when the arm was in use. This side-effect was evaluated to be related to the ","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e314-e325"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400028X/pdfft?md5=2a86b774d05269156d86de416e4f9463&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400028X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Declining motor and cognitive functioning and the role of gait in dementia 运动和认知功能下降以及步态在痴呆症中的作用
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00049-7
Emma Nichols , Jennifer S Rabin
{"title":"Declining motor and cognitive functioning and the role of gait in dementia","authors":"Emma Nichols ,&nbsp;Jennifer S Rabin","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00049-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00049-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e308-e309"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000497/pdfft?md5=cfdadbd8c8161b994d5c5c4624b0b8f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000497-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of recipient age on prioritisation for liver transplantation in the UK: a population-based modelling study 受体年龄对英国肝移植优先顺序的影响:基于人口的模型研究
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00044-8
Anthony Attia BSc MBChB , Jamie Webb MSci , Katherine Connor PhD MRCS , Chris J C Johnston PhD FRCS , Michael Williams PhD MRCP , Tim Gordon-Walker PhD MRCP , Ian A Rowe PhD MRCP , Prof Ewen M Harrison PhD FRCS , Ben M Stutchfield PhD FRCS
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following the introduction of an algorithm aiming to maximise life-years gained from liver transplantation in the UK (the transplant benefit score [TBS]), donor livers were redirected from younger to older patients, mortality rate equalised across the age range and short-term waiting list mortality reduced. Understanding age-related prioritisation has been challenging, especially for younger patients and clinicians allocating non-TBS-directed livers. We aimed to assess age-related prioritisation within the TBS algorithm by modelling liver transplantation prioritisation based on data from a UK transplant unit and comparing these data with other regions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this population-based modelling study, serum parameters and age at liver transplantation assessment of patients attending the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Edinburgh, UK, between December, 2002, and November, 2023, were combined with representative synthetic data to model TBS survival predictions, which were compared according to age group (25–49 years <em>vs</em> ≥60 years), chronic liver disease severity, and disease cause. Models for end-stage liver disease (UKELD [UK], MELD [Eurotransplant region], and MELD 3.0 [USA]) were used as validated comparators of liver disease severity.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of 2093 patients with chronic liver disease, 1808 (86%) had complete datasets and liver disease parameters consistent with eligibility for the liver transplant waiting list in the UK (UKELD ≥49). Disease severity as assessed by UKELD, MELD, and MELD 3.0 did not differ by age (median UKELD scores of 56 for patients aged ≥60 years <em>vs</em> 56 for patients aged 25–49 years; MELD scores of 16 <em>vs</em> 16; and MELD 3.0 scores of 18 <em>vs</em> 18). TBS increased with advancing age (R=0·45, p<0·0001). TBS predicted that transplantation in patients aged 60 years or older would provide a two-fold greater net benefit at 5 years than in patients aged 25–49 years (median TBS 1317 [IQR 1116–1436] in older patients <em>vs</em> 706 [411–1095] in younger patients; p<0·0001). Older patients were predicted to have shorter survival without transplantation than younger patients (263 days [IQR 144–473] in older patients <em>vs</em> 861 days [448–1164] in younger patients; p<0·0001) but similar survival after transplantation (1599 days [1563–1628] <em>vs</em> 1573 days [1525–1614]; p<0·0001). Older patients could reach a TBS for which a liver offer was likely below minimum criteria for transplantation (UKELD <49), whereas many younger patients were required to have high–urgent disease (UKELD >60). US and Eurotransplant programmes did not prioritise according to age.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The UK liver allocation algorithm prioritises older patients for transplantation by predicting that advancing age increases the benefit from liver transplantation. Restricted follow-up and biases in waiting list data m
背景在英国引入旨在最大限度延长肝移植寿命的算法(移植受益评分 [TBS])后,供体肝脏从年轻患者转向老年患者,各年龄段的死亡率趋于一致,短期等待名单上的死亡率也有所降低。了解与年龄相关的优先顺序一直是一项挑战,尤其是对年轻患者和分配非 TBS 引导肝脏的临床医生而言。我们的目的是根据英国移植单位的数据建立肝移植优先顺序模型,并将这些数据与其他地区的数据进行比较,从而评估 TBS 算法中与年龄相关的优先顺序。方法在这项基于人群的建模研究中,我们将 2002 年 12 月至 2023 年 11 月期间在英国爱丁堡苏格兰肝移植单位就诊的患者的血清参数和肝移植评估年龄与具有代表性的合成数据相结合,建立了 TBS 生存预测模型,并根据年龄组(25-49 岁 vs ≥60 岁)、慢性肝病严重程度和疾病原因对预测结果进行了比较。在 2093 名慢性肝病患者中,有 1808 人(86%)拥有完整的数据集和肝病参数,符合英国肝移植候选名单的资格(UKELD ≥49)。根据UKELD、MELD和MELD 3.0评估的疾病严重程度不因年龄而异(年龄≥60岁的患者UKELD评分中位数为56分,25-49岁的患者为56分;MELD评分中位数为16分,25-49岁的患者为16分;MELD 3.0评分中位数为18分,25-49岁的患者为18分)。TBS随年龄增长而增加(R=0-45,p<0-0001)。根据 TBS 预测,与 25-49 岁的患者相比,60 岁或以上的患者在 5 年后接受移植的净获益要高出两倍(老年患者的 TBS 中位数为 1317 [IQR 1116-1436] vs 年轻患者为 706 [411-1095];p<0-0001)。据预测,老年患者未经移植的存活期短于年轻患者(老年患者为 263 天 [IQR 144-473] vs 年轻患者为 861 天 [448-1164];p<0-0001),但移植后的存活期相似(1599 天 [1563-1628] vs 1573 天 [1525-1614];p<0-0001)。年龄较大的患者可以达到TBS,其肝脏报价可能低于移植的最低标准(UKELD <49),而许多年轻患者则需要有高度紧急的疾病(UKELD >60)。美国和欧洲的移植项目并不根据年龄确定优先顺序。释义英国的肝脏分配算法通过预测年龄的增长会增加肝脏移植的获益,从而优先考虑年龄较大的患者进行移植。有限的随访和候选名单数据的偏差可能会限制这些获益预测的准确性。要想全面了解肝移植的益处,除了衡量候选名单上的总死亡率外,还需要其他指标。
{"title":"Effect of recipient age on prioritisation for liver transplantation in the UK: a population-based modelling study","authors":"Anthony Attia BSc MBChB ,&nbsp;Jamie Webb MSci ,&nbsp;Katherine Connor PhD MRCS ,&nbsp;Chris J C Johnston PhD FRCS ,&nbsp;Michael Williams PhD MRCP ,&nbsp;Tim Gordon-Walker PhD MRCP ,&nbsp;Ian A Rowe PhD MRCP ,&nbsp;Prof Ewen M Harrison PhD FRCS ,&nbsp;Ben M Stutchfield PhD FRCS","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00044-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00044-8","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Following the introduction of an algorithm aiming to maximise life-years gained from liver transplantation in the UK (the transplant benefit score [TBS]), donor livers were redirected from younger to older patients, mortality rate equalised across the age range and short-term waiting list mortality reduced. Understanding age-related prioritisation has been challenging, especially for younger patients and clinicians allocating non-TBS-directed livers. We aimed to assess age-related prioritisation within the TBS algorithm by modelling liver transplantation prioritisation based on data from a UK transplant unit and comparing these data with other regions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this population-based modelling study, serum parameters and age at liver transplantation assessment of patients attending the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Edinburgh, UK, between December, 2002, and November, 2023, were combined with representative synthetic data to model TBS survival predictions, which were compared according to age group (25–49 years &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; ≥60 years), chronic liver disease severity, and disease cause. Models for end-stage liver disease (UKELD [UK], MELD [Eurotransplant region], and MELD 3.0 [USA]) were used as validated comparators of liver disease severity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of 2093 patients with chronic liver disease, 1808 (86%) had complete datasets and liver disease parameters consistent with eligibility for the liver transplant waiting list in the UK (UKELD ≥49). Disease severity as assessed by UKELD, MELD, and MELD 3.0 did not differ by age (median UKELD scores of 56 for patients aged ≥60 years &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 56 for patients aged 25–49 years; MELD scores of 16 &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 16; and MELD 3.0 scores of 18 &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 18). TBS increased with advancing age (R=0·45, p&lt;0·0001). TBS predicted that transplantation in patients aged 60 years or older would provide a two-fold greater net benefit at 5 years than in patients aged 25–49 years (median TBS 1317 [IQR 1116–1436] in older patients &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 706 [411–1095] in younger patients; p&lt;0·0001). Older patients were predicted to have shorter survival without transplantation than younger patients (263 days [IQR 144–473] in older patients &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 861 days [448–1164] in younger patients; p&lt;0·0001) but similar survival after transplantation (1599 days [1563–1628] &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; 1573 days [1525–1614]; p&lt;0·0001). Older patients could reach a TBS for which a liver offer was likely below minimum criteria for transplantation (UKELD &lt;49), whereas many younger patients were required to have high–urgent disease (UKELD &gt;60). US and Eurotransplant programmes did not prioritise according to age.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The UK liver allocation algorithm prioritises older patients for transplantation by predicting that advancing age increases the benefit from liver transplantation. Restricted follow-up and biases in waiting list data m","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e346-e355"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000448/pdfft?md5=acbdb963c3b53eb418988f20277b6a46&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000448-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Future policy and research for advance care planning in dementia: consensus recommendations from an international Delphi panel of the European Association for Palliative Care 痴呆症预先护理规划的未来政策和研究:欧洲姑息治疗协会国际德尔菲小组的共识建议
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00043-6
Miharu Nakanishi PhD , Sandra Martins Pereira PhD , Lieve Van den Block PhD , Deborah Parker PhD , Karen Harrison-Dening PhD , Paola Di Giulio MSc , Jürgen In der Schmitten MD , Philip J Larkin PhD , Ninoslav Mimica PhD , Rebecca L Sudore MD , Iva Holmerová PhD , Ida J Korfage PhD , Jenny T van der Steen PhD , European Association for Palliative Care

Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly recognised in the global agenda for dementia care. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Taskforce on ACP in Dementia aimed to provide recommendations for policy initiatives and future research. We conducted a four-round Delphi study with a 33-country panel of 107 experts between September, 2021, and June, 2022, that was approved by the EAPC Board. Consensus was achieved on 11 recommendations concerning the regulation of advance directives, equity of access, and dementia-inclusive approaches and conversations to express patients' values. Identified research gaps included the need for an evidence-based dementia-specific practice model that optimises engagement and communication with people with fluctuating and impaired capacity and their families to support decision making, while also empowering people to adjust their decisions if their goals or preferences change over time. Policy gaps included insufficient health services frameworks for dementia-inclusive practice. The results highlight the need for more evidence and policy development that support inclusive ACP practice models.

在全球痴呆症护理议程中,预先护理计划(ACP)日益得到认可。欧洲姑息关怀协会(EAPC)痴呆症预先关怀计划工作组旨在为政策倡议和未来研究提供建议。2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,我们与 33 个国家的 107 位专家组成的专家小组进行了四轮德尔菲研究,并获得了欧洲姑息关怀协会理事会的批准。我们就 11 项建议达成了共识,这些建议涉及预先指示的监管、公平获取、老年痴呆症包容性方法以及表达患者价值观的对话。已确定的研究差距包括需要一种以证据为基础的痴呆症特定实践模式,该模式可优化与能力波动和受损患者及其家人的接触和沟通,以支持决策,同时还可在患者的目标或偏好随时间发生变化时赋予其调整决策的能力。政策差距包括老年痴呆症包容性实践的医疗服务框架不足。研究结果突出表明,我们需要更多的证据和政策制定来支持全纳老年患者护理实践模式。
{"title":"Future policy and research for advance care planning in dementia: consensus recommendations from an international Delphi panel of the European Association for Palliative Care","authors":"Miharu Nakanishi PhD ,&nbsp;Sandra Martins Pereira PhD ,&nbsp;Lieve Van den Block PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah Parker PhD ,&nbsp;Karen Harrison-Dening PhD ,&nbsp;Paola Di Giulio MSc ,&nbsp;Jürgen In der Schmitten MD ,&nbsp;Philip J Larkin PhD ,&nbsp;Ninoslav Mimica PhD ,&nbsp;Rebecca L Sudore MD ,&nbsp;Iva Holmerová PhD ,&nbsp;Ida J Korfage PhD ,&nbsp;Jenny T van der Steen PhD ,&nbsp;European Association for Palliative Care","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00043-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00043-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly recognised in the global agenda for dementia care. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Taskforce on ACP in Dementia aimed to provide recommendations for policy initiatives and future research. We conducted a four-round Delphi study with a 33-country panel of 107 experts between September, 2021, and June, 2022, that was approved by the EAPC Board. Consensus was achieved on 11 recommendations concerning the regulation of advance directives, equity of access, and dementia-inclusive approaches and conversations to express patients' values. Identified research gaps included the need for an evidence-based dementia-specific practice model that optimises engagement and communication with people with fluctuating and impaired capacity and their families to support decision making, while also empowering people to adjust their decisions if their goals or preferences change over time. Policy gaps included insufficient health services frameworks for dementia-inclusive practice. The results highlight the need for more evidence and policy development that support inclusive ACP practice models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e370-e378"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000436/pdfft?md5=9a2904f9de4562236a4221ffe1b97a26&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000436-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heart failure treatment and mortality in older people: beyond clinical trials 心力衰竭治疗与老年人死亡率:临床试验之外
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00060-6
Marco Zuin , Gianluca Rigatelli , Claudio Bilato
{"title":"Heart failure treatment and mortality in older people: beyond clinical trials","authors":"Marco Zuin ,&nbsp;Gianluca Rigatelli ,&nbsp;Claudio Bilato","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00060-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00060-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e306-e307"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000606/pdfft?md5=88be7bd821871f86c649c09deb4b15fa&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000606-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where is the perfect triangle in the liver allocation system? 肝脏分配系统中的完美三角在哪里?
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00064-3
Kazunari Sasaki , Marc L Melcher
{"title":"Where is the perfect triangle in the liver allocation system?","authors":"Kazunari Sasaki ,&nbsp;Marc L Melcher","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00064-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00064-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e310-e311"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000643/pdfft?md5=e08f8eb43981dffe4b834d25fdf5643e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000643-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social health and subsequent cognitive functioning in people aged 50 years and older: examining the mediating roles of depressive symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers in two European longitudinal studies 50 岁及以上人群的社会健康和后续认知功能:在两项欧洲纵向研究中考察抑郁症状和炎症生物标志物的中介作用
IF 13.1 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00046-1
Jean Stafford PhD , Serhiy Dekhtyar PhD , Anna-Karin Welmer PhD , Davide L Vetrano PhD , Giulia Grande PhD , Erika J Laukka PhD , Anna Marseglia PhD , Vanessa Moulton PhD , Rosie Mansfield PhD , Yiwen Liu PhD , Ke Ning PhD , Prof Karin Wolf-Ostermann PhD , Prof Henry Brodaty DSc , Suraj Samtani PhD , Prof Mohammad Arfan Ikram PhD , René Melis PhD , Prof Joanna Rymaszewska PhD , Dorota Szcześniak PhD , Giorgio Di Gessa PhD , Prof Marcus Richards PhD , Jane Maddock PhD
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social health markers, including marital status, contact frequency, network size, and social support, have been shown to be associated with cognition. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations remain poorly understood. We investigated whether depressive symptoms and inflammation mediated associations between social health and subsequent cognition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a nationally representative longitudinal study in England, UK, we sampled 7136 individuals aged 50 years or older living in private households without dementia at baseline or at the intermediate mediator assessment timepoint, who had recorded information on at least one social health marker and potential mediator. We used four-way decomposition to examine to what extent depressive symptoms, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen mediated associations between social health and subsequent standardised cognition (verbal fluency and delayed and immediate recall), including cognitive change, with slopes derived from multilevel models (12-year slope). We examined whether findings were replicated in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), a population-based longitudinal study in Sweden, in a sample of 2604 individuals aged 60 years or older living at home or in institutions in Kungsholmen (central Stockholm) without dementia at baseline or at the intermediate mediator assessment timepoint (6-year slope). Social health exposures were assessed at baseline, potential mediators were assessed at an intermediate timepoint (wave 2 in ELSA and 6-year follow-up in SNAC-K); cognitive outcomes were assessed at a single timepoint (wave 3 in ELSA and 12-year follow-up in SNAC-K), and cognitive change (between waves 3 and 9 in ELSA and between 6-year and 12-year follow-ups in SNAC-K).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The study sample included 7136 participants from ELSA, of whom 3962 (55·5%) were women and 6934 (97·2%) were White; the mean baseline age was 63·8 years (SD 9·4). Replication analyses included 2604 participants from SNAC-K, of whom 1604 (61·6%) were women (SNAC-K did not collect ethnicity data); the mean baseline age was 72·3 years (SD 10·1). In ELSA, we found indirect effects via depressive symptoms of network size, positive support, and less negative support on subsequent verbal fluency, and of positive support on subsequent immediate recall (pure indirect effect [PIE] 0·002 [95% CI 0·001–0·003]). Depressive symptoms also partially mediated associations between less negative support and slower decline in immediate recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·002]) and in delayed recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·002]), and between positive support and slower decline in immediate recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·001]). We did not observe mediation by inflammatory biomarkers. Findings of mediation by depressive symptoms in the association between positive support and verbal fluency and between
背景社会健康指标(包括婚姻状况、接触频率、网络规模和社会支持)已被证明与认知相关。然而,人们对这些关联的机制仍然知之甚少。我们调查了抑郁症状和炎症是否介导了社会健康与后续认知之间的关联。方法在英国的一项具有全国代表性的纵向研究--英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)中,我们抽取了 7136 名年龄在 50 岁或以上、在基线或中间介导评估时间点生活在私人家庭中且没有痴呆症的人,他们至少记录了一项社会健康指标和潜在介导因素的信息。我们使用四向分解法来研究抑郁症状、C 反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原在多大程度上介导了社会健康与随后的标准化认知(言语流畅性、延迟和即时回忆)之间的关联,包括认知变化,其斜率来自多层次模型(12 年斜率)。我们以 2604 名 60 岁或 60 岁以上、在家中或机构中生活的 Kungsholmen(斯德哥尔摩市中心)老年人为样本,在基线或中间介导评估时间点(6 年斜率)没有痴呆症的瑞典 Kungsholmen 老龄化与护理国家研究 (SNAC-K)(一项基于瑞典人口的纵向研究)中检验了研究结果是否得到了复制。社会健康风险在基线时进行评估,潜在中介因素在中间时间点(ELSA 的第 2 波和 SNAC-K 的 6 年随访)进行评估;认知结果在单一时间点(ELSA 的第 3 波和 SNAC-K 的 12 年随访)和认知变化(ELSA 的第 3 波和第 9 波之间以及 SNAC-K 的 6 年和 12 年随访之间)进行评估。研究结果研究样本包括来自ELSA的7136名参与者,其中3962人(55-5%)为女性,6934人(97-2%)为白人;平均基线年龄为63-8岁(SD 9-4)。复制分析包括来自 SNAC-K 的 2604 名参与者,其中 1604 人(61-6%)为女性(SNAC-K 没有收集种族数据);平均基线年龄为 72-3 岁(标准差 10-1)。在 ELSA 中,我们发现通过抑郁症状,网络规模、积极支持和较少的消极支持对随后的言语流利性有间接影响,而积极支持对随后的即时回忆有间接影响(纯间接影响 [PIE] 0-002 [95% CI 0-001-0-003])。抑郁症状还部分调节了较少的消极支持与即时回忆(PIE 0-001 [0-000-0-002])和延迟回忆(PIE 0-001 [0-000-0-002])下降速度减慢之间的关系,以及积极支持与即时回忆(PIE 0-001 [0-000-0-001])下降速度减慢之间的关系。我们没有观察到炎症生物标志物的中介作用。抑郁症状对积极支持与言语流畅性之间以及积极支持与即时回忆能力变化之间关系的中介作用在SNAC-K中得到了验证。释义本研究结果为社会健康与认知之间的联系机制提供了新的见解,表明社会健康的互动方面(尤其是社会支持)与认知之间的联系部分是由抑郁症状支撑的。
{"title":"Social health and subsequent cognitive functioning in people aged 50 years and older: examining the mediating roles of depressive symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers in two European longitudinal studies","authors":"Jean Stafford PhD ,&nbsp;Serhiy Dekhtyar PhD ,&nbsp;Anna-Karin Welmer PhD ,&nbsp;Davide L Vetrano PhD ,&nbsp;Giulia Grande PhD ,&nbsp;Erika J Laukka PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Marseglia PhD ,&nbsp;Vanessa Moulton PhD ,&nbsp;Rosie Mansfield PhD ,&nbsp;Yiwen Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Ke Ning PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Karin Wolf-Ostermann PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Henry Brodaty DSc ,&nbsp;Suraj Samtani PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Mohammad Arfan Ikram PhD ,&nbsp;René Melis PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Joanna Rymaszewska PhD ,&nbsp;Dorota Szcześniak PhD ,&nbsp;Giorgio Di Gessa PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Marcus Richards PhD ,&nbsp;Jane Maddock PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00046-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00046-1","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Social health markers, including marital status, contact frequency, network size, and social support, have been shown to be associated with cognition. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations remain poorly understood. We investigated whether depressive symptoms and inflammation mediated associations between social health and subsequent cognition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a nationally representative longitudinal study in England, UK, we sampled 7136 individuals aged 50 years or older living in private households without dementia at baseline or at the intermediate mediator assessment timepoint, who had recorded information on at least one social health marker and potential mediator. We used four-way decomposition to examine to what extent depressive symptoms, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen mediated associations between social health and subsequent standardised cognition (verbal fluency and delayed and immediate recall), including cognitive change, with slopes derived from multilevel models (12-year slope). We examined whether findings were replicated in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), a population-based longitudinal study in Sweden, in a sample of 2604 individuals aged 60 years or older living at home or in institutions in Kungsholmen (central Stockholm) without dementia at baseline or at the intermediate mediator assessment timepoint (6-year slope). Social health exposures were assessed at baseline, potential mediators were assessed at an intermediate timepoint (wave 2 in ELSA and 6-year follow-up in SNAC-K); cognitive outcomes were assessed at a single timepoint (wave 3 in ELSA and 12-year follow-up in SNAC-K), and cognitive change (between waves 3 and 9 in ELSA and between 6-year and 12-year follow-ups in SNAC-K).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study sample included 7136 participants from ELSA, of whom 3962 (55·5%) were women and 6934 (97·2%) were White; the mean baseline age was 63·8 years (SD 9·4). Replication analyses included 2604 participants from SNAC-K, of whom 1604 (61·6%) were women (SNAC-K did not collect ethnicity data); the mean baseline age was 72·3 years (SD 10·1). In ELSA, we found indirect effects via depressive symptoms of network size, positive support, and less negative support on subsequent verbal fluency, and of positive support on subsequent immediate recall (pure indirect effect [PIE] 0·002 [95% CI 0·001–0·003]). Depressive symptoms also partially mediated associations between less negative support and slower decline in immediate recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·002]) and in delayed recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·002]), and between positive support and slower decline in immediate recall (PIE 0·001 [0·000–0·001]). We did not observe mediation by inflammatory biomarkers. Findings of mediation by depressive symptoms in the association between positive support and verbal fluency and between","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages e356-e369"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000461/pdfft?md5=4d7163a6c39e22e92bc32235385197ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000461-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140824638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1