首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Healthy Longevity最新文献

英文 中文
The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies 24 个国家 50 岁及以上成年人的社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症状的关系:五项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).
背景:抑郁症是导致精神疾病患者死亡的主要原因。有关社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症之间关系的证据很少。我们旨在确定社会活动和孤独感是否能调节社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关系,以及社会活动、孤独感和社会经济地位对抑郁症的交互或联合关系的程度:在这项基于人群的跨国队列研究中,我们使用了2008年2月15日至2019年2月27日期间24个国家的五项全国代表性调查数据:健康与退休研究(HRS);英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA);欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE);中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS);以及墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)。我们纳入了 50 岁及以上的参与者,他们在基线时报告了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感方面的信息,并且至少接受过两次评估。我们排除了基线时有抑郁症状的参与者、抑郁症状和协变量数据缺失的参与者以及失去随访的参与者。我们使用基于家庭收入、教育和就业状况的潜类分析法将社会经济地位定义为高和低。抑郁症的评估采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)或EURO-D。我们采用 Cox 比例危险模型来估计社会经济地位与抑郁症的关系。我们使用随机效应模型来获得汇总结果。我们探讨了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感对抑郁症的联合效应和交互效应,并使用因果中介分析探讨了社会活动和孤独感在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的中介作用:我们的研究共纳入了 69 160 名参与者,在中位随访 5 年期间,共有 20 237 名参与者患上了抑郁症,总发病率为每 100 人年 7-2 例(95% CI 4-4-10-0)。与社会经济地位高的参与者相比,社会经济地位低的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总危险比 [HR] 1-34; 95% CI 1-23-1-44)。社会经济地位与抑郁之间的关系由社会活动和孤独感介导的比例分别为 6-12% (1-14-28-45) 和 5-54% (0-71-27-62)。我们只观察到社会经济地位和孤独感与抑郁之间存在明显的乘法交互作用(汇总 HR 0-84;0-79-0-90)。与社会经济地位高、社交活跃且不孤独的参与者相比,社会经济地位低、社交不活跃且孤独的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总 HR 2-45;2-08-2-82):社会不活跃和孤独在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关联中起了一小部分正向中介作用,这表明除了针对社会隔离和孤独的干预措施外,还需要其他方法来降低老年人患抑郁症的风险。此外,社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感的共同作用凸显了同时采取综合干预措施以减轻全球抑郁症负担的益处:国家自然科学基金委员会
{"title":"The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X/pdfft?md5=412aa34e9dea043387eb9d7c218215ac&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400134X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142112843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global barriers to hip-fracture care 髋部骨折护理的全球障碍。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6
{"title":"Global barriers to hip-fracture care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000886/pdfft?md5=3a9ca6fcefafd061076cf9811ce4cf88&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000886-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The economic burden of cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke in England in 2018, with projection to 2050: an evaluation of two cohort studies 2018 年英格兰癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风的经济负担以及到 2050 年的预测:对两项队列研究的评估。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9

Background

Cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in England. We aimed to assess the economic burden (including health-care, social care, and informal care costs, as well as productivity losses) of these four conditions in England in 2018, and forecast this cost to 2050 using population projections.

Methods

We used individual patient-level data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, which contains primary care electronic health records of patients from 738 general practices in England, to calculate health-care and residential and nursing home resource use, and data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA) to calculate informal and formal care costs. From CPRD Aurum, we included patients registered on Jan 1, 2018, in a CPRD general practice with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)-linked records, omitting all children younger than 1 year. From ELSA, we included data collected from wave 9 (2018–19). Aggregate English resource use data on morbidity, mortality, and health-care, social care, and informal care were obtained and apportioned, using multivariable regression analyses, to cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke.

Findings

We included 4 161 558 patients from CPRD Aurum with HES-linked data (mean age 41 years [SD 23], with 2 079 679 [50·0%] men and 2 081 879 [50·0%] women) and 8736 patients in ELSA (68 years [11], with 4882 [55·9 %] men and 3854 [44·1%] women). In 2018, the total cost was £18·9 billion (95% CI 18·4–19·4) for cancer, £12·7 billion (12·3–13·0) for coronary heart disease, £11·7 billion (9·6–12·7) for dementia, and £8·6 billion (8·2–9·0) for stroke. Using 2050 English population projections, we estimated that costs would rise by 40% (39–41) for cancer, 54% (53–55) for coronary heart disease, 100% (97–102) for dementia, and 85% (84–86) for stroke, for a total of £26·5 billion (25·7–27·3), £19·6 billion (18·9–20·2), £23·5 billion (19·3–25·3), and £16·0 billion (15·3–16·6), respectively.

Interpretation

This study provides contemporary estimates of the wide-ranging impact of the most important chronic conditions on all aspects of the economy in England. The data will help to inform evidence-based polices to reduce the impact of chronic disease, promoting care access, better health outcomes, and economic sustainability.

Funding

Alzheimer's Research UK.

背景:在英格兰,癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风是导致发病率和死亡率的主要因素。我们旨在评估 2018 年这四种疾病在英格兰造成的经济负担(包括医疗保健、社会护理和非正规护理成本以及生产力损失),并通过人口预测将这一成本预测到 2050 年:我们使用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)Aurum(包含英格兰 738 家全科诊所患者的初级保健电子健康记录)中的患者个人层面数据来计算医疗保健、养老院和护理院的资源使用情况,并使用英格兰老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)中的数据来计算非正式和正式护理成本。从CPRD Aurum中,我们纳入了2018年1月1日在CPRD全科诊所登记并有医院病历统计(HES)链接记录的患者,但省略了所有1岁以下的儿童。从 ELSA 中,我们纳入了第 9 波(2018-19)收集的数据。我们获得了有关发病率、死亡率以及医疗保健、社会护理和非正规护理的英国资源使用汇总数据,并使用多变量回归分析将其分摊到癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风中:我们纳入了 4 161 558 名来自 CPRD Aurum 与 HES 相关数据的患者(平均年龄 41 岁 [SD 23],其中男性 2 079 679 [50-0%] ,女性 2 081 879 [50-0%])和 8736 名 ELSA 患者(68 岁 [11],其中男性 4882 [55-9%] ,女性 3854 [44-1%])。2018 年,癌症总成本为 180-90 亿英镑(95% CI 18-4-19-4),冠心病总成本为 120-7 亿英镑(12-3-13-0),痴呆症总成本为 110-7 亿英镑(9-6-12-7),中风总成本为 80-6 亿英镑(8-2-9-0)。根据 2050 年英国人口预测,我们估计癌症费用将增加 40%(39-41),冠心病费用将增加 54%(53-55),痴呆症费用将增加 100%(97-102),中风费用将增加 85%(84-86),总费用分别为 265 亿英镑(25-7-27-3)、196 亿英镑(18-9-20-2)、230-50 亿英镑(19-3-25-3)和 160 亿英镑(15-3-16-6):本研究提供了最重要的慢性疾病对英格兰经济各个方面的广泛影响的当代估算。这些数据将有助于制定以证据为基础的政策,以减少慢性病的影响,促进医疗服务的普及、更好的健康结果和经济可持续性:资金来源:英国阿尔茨海默氏症研究中心。
{"title":"The economic burden of cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke in England in 2018, with projection to 2050: an evaluation of two cohort studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in England. We aimed to assess the economic burden (including health-care, social care, and informal care costs, as well as productivity losses) of these four conditions in England in 2018, and forecast this cost to 2050 using population projections.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used individual patient-level data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, which contains primary care electronic health records of patients from 738 general practices in England, to calculate health-care and residential and nursing home resource use, and data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA) to calculate informal and formal care costs. From CPRD Aurum, we included patients registered on Jan 1, 2018, in a CPRD general practice with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)-linked records, omitting all children younger than 1 year. From ELSA, we included data collected from wave 9 (2018–19). Aggregate English resource use data on morbidity, mortality, and health-care, social care, and informal care were obtained and apportioned, using multivariable regression analyses, to cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We included 4 161 558 patients from CPRD Aurum with HES-linked data (mean age 41 years [SD 23], with 2 079 679 [50·0%] men and 2 081 879 [50·0%] women) and 8736 patients in ELSA (68 years [11], with 4882 [55·9 %] men and 3854 [44·1%] women). In 2018, the total cost was £18·9 billion (95% CI 18·4–19·4) for cancer, £12·7 billion (12·3–13·0) for coronary heart disease, £11·7 billion (9·6–12·7) for dementia, and £8·6 billion (8·2–9·0) for stroke. Using 2050 English population projections, we estimated that costs would rise by 40% (39–41) for cancer, 54% (53–55) for coronary heart disease, 100% (97–102) for dementia, and 85% (84–86) for stroke, for a total of £26·5 billion (25·7–27·3), £19·6 billion (18·9–20·2), £23·5 billion (19·3–25·3), and £16·0 billion (15·3–16·6), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study provides contemporary estimates of the wide-ranging impact of the most important chronic conditions on all aspects of the economy in England. The data will help to inform evidence-based polices to reduce the impact of chronic disease, promoting care access, better health outcomes, and economic sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Alzheimer's Research UK.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001089/pdfft?md5=e457d0f2af96e04d97c9bfe514b3cebd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001089-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deprescribing for older adults with hypertension at high risk for adverse events: not so fast 对有高不良事件风险的高血压老年人取消处方:没那么快。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003
{"title":"Deprescribing for older adults with hypertension at high risk for adverse events: not so fast","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001363/pdfft?md5=72266904b1289ce694ba26d8e7b27e71&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001363-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in low-income and middle-income regions: a secondary analysis of data from the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) 低收入和中等收入地区从受伤到进行髋部骨折手术的时间:对国际骨折护理骨科多中心研究(INORMUS)数据的二次分析。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X

Background

Globally, fall-related injuries are a substantial problem, and 80% of fatal falls occur in low-income and middle-income countries. We aimed to measure time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in people aged 50 years or older living in low-income and middle-income regions, as well as to measure the proportion of patients with surgical stabilisation of their hip fracture within 72 h of admission to hospital and to identify risk factors associated with surgical delay.

Methods

For this secondary analysis, we analysed data collected from Africa, Latin America, China, India, and Asia (excluding China and India) for the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) between March 29, 2014, and June 15, 2022. Patients from INORMUS were included in this analysis if they were aged 50 years or older and had an isolated, primary hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall. Staff at participating hospitals identified patients with musculoskeletal injury and referred them for assessment of eligibility. We report time from injury to surgery as three distinct time periods: time from injury to hospital admission, time from admission to surgery, and a total time from injury to surgery. Date and time of injury were self-reported by patients at the time of study recruitment. If time to hospital admission after injury exceeded 24 h, patients reported the primary reason for delayed admission. Reasons for surgery, no surgery, and surgical delay were reported by the treating team. For patients undergoing surgery, multivariable regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for surgical delay.

Findings

4486 adults aged 50 years or older with an isolated, primary hip fracture were enrolled in INORMUS from 55 hospitals in 24 countries. Countries were grouped into five regions: Africa (418 [9·3%] of 4486), Latin America (558 [12·4%]), China (1680 [37·4%]), India (1059 [23·6%]) and Asia (excluding China and India; 771 [17·2%]). Of 4486 patients, 3805 (84·8%) received surgery. The rate of surgery was similar in all regions except in Africa, where only 193 (46·3%) of 418 patients had surgery. Overall, 2791 (62·2%) of 4486 patients were admitted to hospital within 24 h of injury. However, 1019 (22·7%) of 4486 patients had delayed hospital admission of 72 h or more from injury. The two most common reasons for delayed admission of more than 24 h were transfer from another hospital (522 [36·2%] of 1441) and delayed care-seeking because patients thought the injury would heal on its own (480 [33·3%]). Once admitted to hospital, 1451 (38·1%) of 3805 patients who received surgery did so within 72 h (median 4·0 days [IQR 1·7–6·0]). Regional variation was seen in the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 72 h of hospital admission (92 [17·9%] of 514 in Latin America, 53 [27·5%] of 193 in Africa, 454 [30·9%] of 1471 in China, 318 [44·4%] of 716 in Asia [excluding Chi

背景:在全球范围内,与跌倒有关的伤害是一个严重问题,80%的致命跌倒发生在低收入和中等收入国家。我们的目的是测量低收入和中等收入地区 50 岁及以上人群从受伤到接受髋部骨折手术的时间,以及测量在入院 72 小时内通过手术稳定髋部骨折的患者比例,并确定与手术延迟相关的风险因素:在这项二次分析中,我们分析了 2014 年 3 月 29 日至 2022 年 6 月 15 日期间为国际骨折护理骨科多中心研究(INORMUS)从非洲、拉丁美洲、中国、印度和亚洲(不包括中国和印度)收集的数据。INORMUS 研究中的患者如果年龄在 50 岁或以上,且因地面摔倒导致孤立性原发性髋部骨折,则可纳入本次分析。参与医院的工作人员会对肌肉骨骼损伤患者进行鉴定,并将其转诊以进行资格评估。我们将从受伤到手术的时间报告为三个不同的时间段:从受伤到入院的时间、从入院到手术的时间以及从受伤到手术的总时间。受伤日期和时间由患者在研究招募时自行报告。如果受伤后入院时间超过 24 小时,患者会报告延迟入院的主要原因。手术、未手术和手术延迟的原因由治疗小组报告。对于接受手术的患者,采用多变量回归分析来确定手术延迟的风险因素:来自 24 个国家 55 家医院的 4486 名年龄在 50 岁或以上、患有孤立性原发性髋部骨折的成人参加了 INORMUS。各国被分为五个地区:非洲(4486 人中有 418 人[9-3%])、拉丁美洲(558 人[12-4%])、中国(1680 人[37-4%])、印度(1059 人[23-6%])和亚洲(不包括中国和印度;771 人[17-2%])。在 4486 名患者中,3805 人(84-8%)接受了手术治疗。所有地区的手术率都差不多,但非洲除外,418 名患者中只有 193 人(46-3%)接受了手术。总体而言,4486 名患者中有 2791 人(62-2%)在受伤后 24 小时内入院。然而,在 4486 名患者中,有 1019 人(22-7%)在受伤后 72 小时或更长时间内延迟入院。延迟入院超过24小时的两个最常见原因是从其他医院转院(1441人中有522人[36-2%]),以及患者认为损伤会自行愈合而延迟就医(480人[33-3%])。入院后,3805 名患者中有 1451 人(38-1%)在 72 小时内接受了手术(中位数为 4-0 天[IQR 1-7-6-0])。入院 72 小时内接受手术的患者比例存在地区差异(拉丁美洲 514 例中有 92 例[17-9%],非洲 193 例中有 53 例[27-5%],中国 1471 例中有 454 例[30-9%],亚洲(不包括中国和印度)716 例中有 318 例[44-4%],印度 911 例中有 534 例[58-6%])。在所有 3805 名接受手术治疗的患者中,有 2353 人(61-8%)从入院起等待了 72 小时或更长时间。从受伤起 72 小时内接受手术治疗的患者比例为 3805 人中的 889 人(23-4%)(拉丁美洲 517 人中的 50 人(9-7%)、非洲 193 人中的 31 人(16-1%)、中国 1471 人中的 277 人(18-8%)、亚洲(不包括中国和印度)716 人中的 189 人(26-4%)和印度 911 人中的 342 人(37-5%)):入院后 72 小时内接受手术的机会较少,影响手术时间的因素因地区而异。要了解髋部骨折护理的现有途径,就必须掌握相关数据,以便为当地制定质量改进措施提供依据:资金来源:澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会、加拿大健康研究所、麦克马斯特外科协会、汉密尔顿健康科学公司和美国国立卫生研究院。
{"title":"Time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in low-income and middle-income regions: a secondary analysis of data from the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Globally, fall-related injuries are a substantial problem, and 80% of fatal falls occur in low-income and middle-income countries. We aimed to measure time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in people aged 50 years or older living in low-income and middle-income regions, as well as to measure the proportion of patients with surgical stabilisation of their hip fracture within 72 h of admission to hospital and to identify risk factors associated with surgical delay.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this secondary analysis, we analysed data collected from Africa, Latin America, China, India, and Asia (excluding China and India) for the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) between March 29, 2014, and June 15, 2022. Patients from INORMUS were included in this analysis if they were aged 50 years or older and had an isolated, primary hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall. Staff at participating hospitals identified patients with musculoskeletal injury and referred them for assessment of eligibility. We report time from injury to surgery as three distinct time periods: time from injury to hospital admission, time from admission to surgery, and a total time from injury to surgery. Date and time of injury were self-reported by patients at the time of study recruitment. If time to hospital admission after injury exceeded 24 h, patients reported the primary reason for delayed admission. Reasons for surgery, no surgery, and surgical delay were reported by the treating team. For patients undergoing surgery, multivariable regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for surgical delay.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>4486 adults aged 50 years or older with an isolated, primary hip fracture were enrolled in INORMUS from 55 hospitals in 24 countries. Countries were grouped into five regions: Africa (418 [9·3%] of 4486), Latin America (558 [12·4%]), China (1680 [37·4%]), India (1059 [23·6%]) and Asia (excluding China and India; 771 [17·2%]). Of 4486 patients, 3805 (84·8%) received surgery. The rate of surgery was similar in all regions except in Africa, where only 193 (46·3%) of 418 patients had surgery. Overall, 2791 (62·2%) of 4486 patients were admitted to hospital within 24 h of injury. However, 1019 (22·7%) of 4486 patients had delayed hospital admission of 72 h or more from injury. The two most common reasons for delayed admission of more than 24 h were transfer from another hospital (522 [36·2%] of 1441) and delayed care-seeking because patients thought the injury would heal on its own (480 [33·3%]). Once admitted to hospital, 1451 (38·1%) of 3805 patients who received surgery did so within 72 h (median 4·0 days [IQR 1·7–6·0]). Regional variation was seen in the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 72 h of hospital admission (92 [17·9%] of 514 in Latin America, 53 [27·5%] of 193 in Africa, 454 [30·9%] of 1471 in China, 318 [44·4%] of 716 in Asia [excluding Chi","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400062X/pdfft?md5=5dc7aa47625fc75db61bf34ba5fbbad1&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400062X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leadership – can you be too old? 领导力--你能太老吗?
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007
{"title":"Leadership – can you be too old?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001405/pdfft?md5=8bf7c352484263f11e89e1ddb6b6446a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001405-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of remnant cholesterol with risk of dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea 残余胆固醇与痴呆症风险的关系:韩国一项全国性人群队列研究。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00112-0

Background

The association between remnant cholesterol (remnant-C) and cardiovascular disease risk is well established, but its association with dementia remains unclear. We aimed to examine this association using a large-scale population dataset.

Methods

We did a nationwide, population-based cohort study in which we identified participants aged 40 years and older who underwent the national health examination in 2009 from South Korea's National Health Insurance Service. We excluded people who were younger than 40 years and those with a triglyceride concentration of 400 mg/dL or higher due to concerns regarding the accuracy of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in individuals with extremely high triglyceride concentrations. People who were previously diagnosed with dementia before the index date, and those who had any missing variables were also excluded. To minimise the influence of possible reverse causation, we excluded individuals who had developed any type of dementia within 1 year of the baseline measurements. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia in each quartile of remnant-C using the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, income level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, diabetes, hypertension, statin and fibrate use, and total cholesterol concentrations. We also did subgroup analyses to investigate the association between remnant-C and the risk of dementia stratified by age, sex, obesity, glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, new-onset type 2 diabetes, type 2 diabetes with a duration of less than 5 years, and type 2 diabetes with a duration of 5 years or more), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and dyslipidaemia, using likelihood ratio tests.

Findings

4 234 415 individuals who underwent the national health examination in 2009 were deemed eligible for inclusion. We excluded 1 612 819 individuals on the basis of age, triglyceride concentration, missing variables, or having dementia at baseline. We identified 2 621 596 participants aged 40 years and older (1 305 556 men and 1 316 040 women) who underwent the national health examination and followed them up until the date of any incident of dementia or the end of the study period of Dec 31, 2020. During a median follow-up of 10·3 years (IQR 10·1–10·6), 146 991 (5·6%) participants developed all-cause dementia, 117 739 (4·5%) developed Alzheimer's disease, and 14 536 (0·6%) developed vascular dementia. The risk of dementia increased progressively with higher remnant-C concentrations. Compared with the lowest quartile of remnant-C (quartile 1), HRs in the highest quartile (quartile 4) were 1·11 (95% CI 1·09–1·13) for all-cause dementia, 1·11 (1·08–1·13) for Alzheimer's disease, and 1·15 (1·09–1·21) for vascular dementia. Subgroup

背景:残余胆固醇(remainant-C)与心血管疾病风险之间的关系已被证实,但其与痴呆症之间的关系仍不清楚。我们的目的是利用大规模人口数据集来研究这种关联:我们在全国范围内开展了一项基于人群的队列研究,从韩国国民健康保险服务机构中找到了在 2009 年接受国民健康检查的 40 岁及以上的参与者。由于担心计算甘油三酯浓度极高的人的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度的准确性,我们排除了年龄小于 40 岁的人和甘油三酯浓度为 400 mg/dL 或更高的人。此外,还排除了在指数日期之前曾被诊断为痴呆症的患者以及变量缺失的患者。为了尽量减少可能的反向因果关系的影响,我们排除了在基线测量后 1 年内罹患任何类型痴呆症的人。我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型计算了残余 C 各四分位数中全因痴呆、阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆的危险比(HRs),并对年龄、性别、体重指数、估计肾小球滤过率、收入水平、吸烟状况、饮酒量、经常锻炼、糖尿病、高血压、他汀类药物和非贝特类药物的使用情况以及总胆固醇浓度进行了调整。我们还进行了亚组分析,利用似然比检验,按照年龄、性别、肥胖程度、血糖状况(正常血糖、空腹血糖受损、新发 2 型糖尿病、病程少于 5 年的 2 型糖尿病和病程 5 年或以上的 2 型糖尿病)、高血压、慢性肾病和血脂异常等分层,研究残余物-C 与痴呆症风险之间的关系:4 234 415 名在 2009 年接受了全国健康检查的人被认为符合纳入条件。由于年龄、甘油三酯浓度、变量缺失或基线时患有痴呆症,我们排除了 1 612 819 人。我们确定了 2 621 596 名 40 岁及以上的参与者(男性 1 305 556 人,女性 1 316 040 人)接受了全国健康检查,并对他们进行了随访,直至发生痴呆症或研究期于 2020 年 12 月 31 日结束。在中位 10-3 年(IQR 10-1-10-6)的随访期间,146 991 人(5-6%)患上了全因痴呆症,117 739 人(4-5%)患上了阿尔茨海默病,14 536 人(0-6%)患上了血管性痴呆症。患痴呆症的风险随着残余 C 浓度的升高而逐渐增加。与残余 C 最低四分位数(四分位数 1)相比,最高四分位数(四分位数 4)的全因痴呆 HR 值为 1-11 (95% CI 1-09-1-13),阿尔茨海默病为 1-11 (1-08-1-13),血管性痴呆为 1-15 (1-09-1-21)。亚组分析表明,40-59 岁的中年人患痴呆症的风险高于老年人。与没有糖尿病的人相比,患有糖尿病的人与高浓度残余物-C相关的痴呆风险明显更高,而且随着糖尿病持续时间的延长,痴呆风险急剧增加:结果显示,残余物-C浓度越高,患全因痴呆症、阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆症的风险越高。要确定这一发现的内在机制,还需要进行更多的研究。监测和管理较高浓度的残余 C 可能对降低痴呆症风险有重要意义:无。
{"title":"Association of remnant cholesterol with risk of dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00112-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00112-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The association between remnant cholesterol (remnant-C) and cardiovascular disease risk is well established, but its association with dementia remains unclear. We aimed to examine this association using a large-scale population dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We did a nationwide, population-based cohort study in which we identified participants aged 40 years and older who underwent the national health examination in 2009 from South Korea's National Health Insurance Service. We excluded people who were younger than 40 years and those with a triglyceride concentration of 400 mg/dL or higher due to concerns regarding the accuracy of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in individuals with extremely high triglyceride concentrations. People who were previously diagnosed with dementia before the index date, and those who had any missing variables were also excluded. To minimise the influence of possible reverse causation, we excluded individuals who had developed any type of dementia within 1 year of the baseline measurements. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia in each quartile of remnant-C using the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, income level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, diabetes, hypertension, statin and fibrate use, and total cholesterol concentrations. We also did subgroup analyses to investigate the association between remnant-C and the risk of dementia stratified by age, sex, obesity, glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, new-onset type 2 diabetes, type 2 diabetes with a duration of less than 5 years, and type 2 diabetes with a duration of 5 years or more), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and dyslipidaemia, using likelihood ratio tests.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>4 234 415 individuals who underwent the national health examination in 2009 were deemed eligible for inclusion. We excluded 1 612 819 individuals on the basis of age, triglyceride concentration, missing variables, or having dementia at baseline. We identified 2 621 596 participants aged 40 years and older (1 305 556 men and 1 316 040 women) who underwent the national health examination and followed them up until the date of any incident of dementia or the end of the study period of Dec 31, 2020. During a median follow-up of 10·3 years (IQR 10·1–10·6), 146 991 (5·6%) participants developed all-cause dementia, 117 739 (4·5%) developed Alzheimer's disease, and 14 536 (0·6%) developed vascular dementia. The risk of dementia increased progressively with higher remnant-C concentrations. Compared with the lowest quartile of remnant-C (quartile 1), HRs in the highest quartile (quartile 4) were 1·11 (95% CI 1·09–1·13) for all-cause dementia, 1·11 (1·08–1·13) for Alzheimer's disease, and 1·15 (1·09–1·21) for vascular dementia. Subgroup","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001120/pdfft?md5=ffafe5c66083ae34bd4cbbec516f10d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001120-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of antihypertensive deprescribing on hospitalisation and mortality: long-term follow-up of the OPTiMISE randomised controlled trial 降压药减量对住院和死亡率的影响:OPTiMISE 随机对照试验的长期随访。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4

Background

Deprescribing of antihypertensive medications is recommended for some older patients with low blood pressure and frailty. The OPTiMISE trial showed that this deprescribing can be achieved with no differences in blood pressure control at 3 months compared with usual care. We aimed to examine effects of deprescribing on longer-term hospitalisation and mortality.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial enrolled participants from 69 general practices across central and southern England. Participants aged 80 years or older, with systolic blood pressure less than 150 mm Hg and who were receiving two or more antihypertensive medications, were randomly assigned (1:1) to antihypertensive medication reduction (removal of one antihypertensive) or usual care. General practitioners and participants were aware of the treatment allocation following randomisation but individuals responsible for analysing the data were masked to the treatment allocation throughout the study. Participants were followed up via their primary and secondary care electronic health records at least 3 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was time to all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. Intention-to-treat analyses were done using Cox regression modelling. A per-protocol analysis of the primary outcome was also done, excluding participants from the intervention group who did not reduce treatment or who had medication reinstated during the initial trial 12-week follow-up period. This study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT2016-004236-38) and the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN97503221).

Findings

Between March 20, 2017, and Sept 30, 2018, a total of 569 participants were randomly assigned. Of these, 564 (99%; intervention=280; control=284) were followed up for a median of 4·0 years (IQR 3·7–4·3). Participants had a mean age of 84·8 years (SD 3·4) at baseline and 273 (48%) were women. Medication reduction was sustained in 109 participants at follow-up (51% of the 213 participants alive in the intervention group). Participants in the intervention group had a larger reduction in antihypertensives than the control group (adjusted mean difference –0·35 drugs [95% CI –0·52 to –0·18]). Overall, 202 (72%) participants in the intervention group and 218 (77%) participants in the control group experienced hospitalisation or mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·76 to 1·12]). There was some evidence that the proportion of participants experiencing the primary outcome in the per-protocol population was lower in the intervention group (aHR 0·80 [0·64 to 1·00]).

Interpretation

Half of participants sustained medication reduction with no evidence of an increase in all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. These findings suggest that an antihypertensive deprescribing intervention might be safe for people age

背景:建议对一些低血压和体弱的老年患者减量服用降压药。OPTiMISE 试验表明,与常规治疗相比,减药后 3 个月的血压控制效果没有差异。我们的目标是研究减量对长期住院率和死亡率的影响:这项随机对照试验招募了英格兰中部和南部 69 家全科诊所的参与者。年龄在 80 岁或以上、收缩压低于 150 mm Hg 且服用两种或两种以上降压药的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受降压药减量治疗(停用一种降压药)或常规治疗。全科医生和参与者都知道随机分配后的治疗方案,但负责分析数据的人员在整个研究过程中都不知道治疗方案的分配。参与者在随机分配后至少 3 年通过其初级和中级医疗电子健康记录接受随访。主要结果是全因住院时间或死亡率。采用 Cox 回归模型进行意向治疗分析。此外,还对主要结果进行了协议分析,排除了干预组中未减少治疗或在最初试验的12周随访期间恢复用药的参与者。本研究已在欧盟药物管理局临床试验数据库(EudraCT2016-004236-38)和ISRCTN注册中心(ISRCTN97503221)注册:2017年3月20日至2018年9月30日期间,共有569名参与者被随机分配。其中,564人(99%;干预组=280人;对照组=284人)接受了中位数为4-0年(IQR为3-7-4-3)的随访。基线参与者的平均年龄为 84-8 岁(SD 3-4),273 人(48%)为女性。有 109 名参与者在随访中持续减少用药(占干预组 213 名存活参与者的 51%)。与对照组相比,干预组的参与者减少了更多的降压药(调整后的平均差异为-0-35 种药物 [95% CI -0-52至-0-18])。总体而言,干预组中有 202 人(72%)在随访期间住院或死亡,对照组中有 218 人(77%)住院或死亡(调整后危险比 [aHR] 0-93 [95% CI 0-76 to 1-12])。有证据表明,在干预组中,按协议人群中出现主要结果的参与者比例较低(aHR 0-80 [0-64 to 1-00]):半数参与者持续减少用药,没有证据表明全因住院率或死亡率上升。这些研究结果表明,对于80岁或80岁以上、血压得到控制、服用两种或两种以上降压药的人来说,降压药减量干预可能是安全的:资金来源:英国心脏基金会和国家健康与护理研究所。
{"title":"Effect of antihypertensive deprescribing on hospitalisation and mortality: long-term follow-up of the OPTiMISE randomised controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deprescribing of antihypertensive medications is recommended for some older patients with low blood pressure and frailty. The OPTiMISE trial showed that this deprescribing can be achieved with no differences in blood pressure control at 3 months compared with usual care. We aimed to examine effects of deprescribing on longer-term hospitalisation and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomised controlled trial enrolled participants from 69 general practices across central and southern England. Participants aged 80 years or older, with systolic blood pressure less than 150 mm Hg and who were receiving two or more antihypertensive medications, were randomly assigned (1:1) to antihypertensive medication reduction (removal of one antihypertensive) or usual care. General practitioners and participants were aware of the treatment allocation following randomisation but individuals responsible for analysing the data were masked to the treatment allocation throughout the study. Participants were followed up via their primary and secondary care electronic health records at least 3 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was time to all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. Intention-to-treat analyses were done using Cox regression modelling. A per-protocol analysis of the primary outcome was also done, excluding participants from the intervention group who did not reduce treatment or who had medication reinstated during the initial trial 12-week follow-up period. This study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT2016-004236-38) and the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN97503221).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between March 20, 2017, and Sept 30, 2018, a total of 569 participants were randomly assigned. Of these, 564 (99%; intervention=280; control=284) were followed up for a median of 4·0 years (IQR 3·7–4·3). Participants had a mean age of 84·8 years (SD 3·4) at baseline and 273 (48%) were women. Medication reduction was sustained in 109 participants at follow-up (51% of the 213 participants alive in the intervention group). Participants in the intervention group had a larger reduction in antihypertensives than the control group (adjusted mean difference –0·35 drugs [95% CI –0·52 to –0·18]). Overall, 202 (72%) participants in the intervention group and 218 (77%) participants in the control group experienced hospitalisation or mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·76 to 1·12]). There was some evidence that the proportion of participants experiencing the primary outcome in the per-protocol population was lower in the intervention group (aHR 0·80 [0·64 to 1·00]).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Half of participants sustained medication reduction with no evidence of an increase in all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. These findings suggest that an antihypertensive deprescribing intervention might be safe for people age","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001314/pdfft?md5=4ff5939879eacaa149462e5d9052625b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001314-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations of social determinants of health with life expectancy and future health risks among individuals with type 2 diabetes: two nationwide cohort studies in the UK and USA 健康的社会决定因素与 2 型糖尿病患者的预期寿命和未来健康风险的关系:英国和美国的两项全国性队列研究。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00116-8

Background

Social determinants of health (SDHs) are the primary drivers of preventable health inequities, and the associations between SDHs and health outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear. This study aimed to estimate the associations of combined SDHs with life expectancy and future health risks among adults with type 2 diabetes from the UK and USA.

Methods

In an analysis of two nationwide cohort studies, adults with type 2 diabetes were identified from the UK Biobank from March 13, 2006, to Oct 1, 2010 (adults aged 37–73 years) and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018 (adults aged ≥20 years). Participants with type 2 diabetes at baseline were included in our analysis. Participants without information on SDHs or follow-up were excluded. The UK Biobank assessed 17 SDHs and the US NHANES assessed ten SDHs, with each SDH dichotomised into advantaged and disadvantaged levels. The combined score of SDHs were calculated as the sum of the weighted scores for each SDH. Participants were then categorised into tertiles (favourable, medium, and unfavourable SDH groups). Primary outcomes were life expectancy and mortality in both cohorts, and incidences of cardiovascular disease, diabetes-related microvascular disease, dementia, and cancer in the UK Biobank. Outcomes were obtained from disease registries up until Dec 31, 2021, in the UK Biobank and Dec 31, 2019, in the US NHANES cohorts.

Findings

We included 17 321 participants from the UK Biobank cohort (median age 61·0 years [IQR 56·0–65·0]; 6028 [34·8%] women and 11 293 [65·2%] men) and 7885 participants from the NHANES cohort (mean age 59·2 years [95% CI 58·7–59·6]; 3835 [49·1%, weighted] women and 4050 [50·9%, weighted] men) in our analysis. In the UK Biobank, 3235 deaths (median follow-up 12·3 years [IQR 11·5–13·2]), 3010 incident cardiovascular disease (12·1 years [10·8–13·0]), 1997 diabetes-related microvascular disease (8·0 years [7·1–8·9]), 773 dementia (12·6 years [11·8–13·5]), and 2259 cancer cases (11·3 years [10·4–12·2]) were documented; and the US NHANES documented 2278 deaths during a median follow-up of 7·0 years (3·7–11·2). After multivariable adjustment, compared with the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratio was 1·33 (95% CI 1·21–1·46) in the medium SDH group and 1·89 (1·72–2·07) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1·51 (1·34–1·70) in the medium SDH group and 2·02 (1·75–2·33) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort for all-cause mortality; 1·13 (1·04–1·24) in the medium SDH group and 1·40 (1·27–1·53) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident cardiovascular disease; 1·13 (1·01–1·27) in the medium SDH group and 1·41 (1·26–1·59) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident diabetes-related microvascular disease; 1·35 (1·11–1·64) in the medium SDH group and 1·76 (1·46–2·13) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident dementi

背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDHs)是造成可预防的健康不平等的主要驱动因素,SDHs 与 2 型糖尿病患者的健康结果之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在估算英国和美国 2 型糖尿病成人患者的综合 SDHs 与预期寿命和未来健康风险之间的关系:在对两项全国性队列研究进行的分析中,从 2006 年 3 月 13 日至 2010 年 10 月 1 日的英国生物库(37-73 岁的成年人)和 1999 年至 2018 年的美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)(≥20 岁的成年人)中确定了 2 型糖尿病成年人。基线时患有 2 型糖尿病的参与者被纳入我们的分析。没有 SDHs 或随访信息的参与者被排除在外。英国生物库评估了17项SDHs,美国NHANES评估了10项SDHs,每项SDHs均分为优势水平和劣势水平。SDHs 的综合得分按每项 SDH 的加权得分之和计算。然后将参与者分为三等分(SDH 有利组、中等组和不利组)。主要结果是两个队列的预期寿命和死亡率,以及英国生物库中心血管疾病、糖尿病相关微血管疾病、痴呆症和癌症的发病率。英国生物库和美国NHANES队列的研究结果分别来自截至2021年12月31日和2019年12月31日的疾病登记:我们在分析中纳入了英国生物库队列中的 17 321 名参与者(中位数年龄 61-0 岁 [IQR 56-0-65-0]; 6028 [34-8%] 女性和 11 293 [65-2%] 男性)和 NHANES 队列中的 7 885 名参与者(平均年龄 59-2 岁 [95% CI 58-7-59-6]; 3835 [49-1%, 加权] 女性和 4050 [50-9%, 加权] 男性)。英国生物库记录了 3235 例死亡病例(中位数随访 12-3 年 [IQR 11-5-13-2])、3010 例心血管疾病病例(12-1 年 [10-8-13-0])、1997 例糖尿病相关微血管疾病病例(8-0 年 [7-1-8-9])、773 例痴呆病例(12-6 年 [11-8-13-5])和 2259 例癌症病例(11-3 年 [10-4-12-2]);美国 NHANES 记录了 2278 例死亡病例,中位数随访 7-0 年 (3-7-11-2)。经过多变量调整后,在英国生物库队列中,与SDH良好组相比,SDH中等组的危险比为1-33(95% CI 1-21-1-46),SDH不良组的危险比为1-89(1-72-2-07);在美国 NHANES 队列中,在全因死亡率方面,中等 SDH 组为 1-51(1-34-1-70),不利 SDH 组为 2-02(1-75-2-33);在心血管疾病发病率方面,中等 SDH 组为 1-13(1-04-1-24),不利 SDH 组为 1-40(1-27-1-53);在糖尿病相关微血管疾病方面,中等SDH组为1-13(1-01-1-27),不利SDH组为1-41(1-26-1-59);在痴呆症方面,中等SDH组为1-35(1-11-1-64),不利SDH组为1-76(1-46-2-13);在英国生物库队列中,中等SDH组癌症发病率为1-02(0-92-1-13),不利SDH组癌症发病率为1-17(1-05-1-30)(ptrend解释:综合不利的 SDH 与 2 型糖尿病成人患者预期寿命的延长和未来出现不良健康后果的风险增加有关。这些关联在来自不同社会背景的两个全国性队列中相似,在具有不同人口、生活方式和临床特征的人群中也基本一致。因此,评估2型糖尿病患者的综合SDHs可能是一种很有前景的方法,可将其纳入糖尿病护理中,以识别社会弱势群体并减轻疾病负担:国家自然科学基金、国家重点研发计划、中央高校基本科研业务费。
{"title":"Associations of social determinants of health with life expectancy and future health risks among individuals with type 2 diabetes: two nationwide cohort studies in the UK and USA","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00116-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00116-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social determinants of health (SDHs) are the primary drivers of preventable health inequities, and the associations between SDHs and health outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear. This study aimed to estimate the associations of combined SDHs with life expectancy and future health risks among adults with type 2 diabetes from the UK and USA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In an analysis of two nationwide cohort studies, adults with type 2 diabetes were identified from the UK Biobank from March 13, 2006, to Oct 1, 2010 (adults aged 37–73 years) and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018 (adults aged ≥20 years). Participants with type 2 diabetes at baseline were included in our analysis. Participants without information on SDHs or follow-up were excluded. The UK Biobank assessed 17 SDHs and the US NHANES assessed ten SDHs, with each SDH dichotomised into advantaged and disadvantaged levels. The combined score of SDHs were calculated as the sum of the weighted scores for each SDH. Participants were then categorised into tertiles (favourable, medium, and unfavourable SDH groups). Primary outcomes were life expectancy and mortality in both cohorts, and incidences of cardiovascular disease, diabetes-related microvascular disease, dementia, and cancer in the UK Biobank. Outcomes were obtained from disease registries up until Dec 31, 2021, in the UK Biobank and Dec 31, 2019, in the US NHANES cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We included 17 321 participants from the UK Biobank cohort (median age 61·0 years [IQR 56·0–65·0]; 6028 [34·8%] women and 11 293 [65·2%] men) and 7885 participants from the NHANES cohort (mean age 59·2 years [95% CI 58·7–59·6]; 3835 [49·1%, weighted] women and 4050 [50·9%, weighted] men) in our analysis. In the UK Biobank, 3235 deaths (median follow-up 12·3 years [IQR 11·5–13·2]), 3010 incident cardiovascular disease (12·1 years [10·8–13·0]), 1997 diabetes-related microvascular disease (8·0 years [7·1–8·9]), 773 dementia (12·6 years [11·8–13·5]), and 2259 cancer cases (11·3 years [10·4–12·2]) were documented; and the US NHANES documented 2278 deaths during a median follow-up of 7·0 years (3·7–11·2). After multivariable adjustment, compared with the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratio was 1·33 (95% CI 1·21–1·46) in the medium SDH group and 1·89 (1·72–2·07) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1·51 (1·34–1·70) in the medium SDH group and 2·02 (1·75–2·33) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort for all-cause mortality; 1·13 (1·04–1·24) in the medium SDH group and 1·40 (1·27–1·53) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident cardiovascular disease; 1·13 (1·01–1·27) in the medium SDH group and 1·41 (1·26–1·59) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident diabetes-related microvascular disease; 1·35 (1·11–1·64) in the medium SDH group and 1·76 (1·46–2·13) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident dementi","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001168/pdfft?md5=f9ff43c829a3536d2937180581e83a7e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001168-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Different reasonable methodological choices can lead to vastly different estimates of the economic burden of diseases 不同的合理方法选择会导致对疾病经济负担的估算大相径庭。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00130-2
{"title":"Different reasonable methodological choices can lead to vastly different estimates of the economic burden of diseases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00130-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00130-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001302/pdfft?md5=eba7dfb7428c1b574ce1713a8f8887c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001302-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1