首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Healthy Longevity最新文献

英文 中文
The lack of legacy benefits of low-dose aspirin: the ASPREE study 低剂量阿司匹林缺乏遗留益处:ASPREE研究。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100769
Katrina Davis , Sevil Yasar
{"title":"The lack of legacy benefits of low-dose aspirin: the ASPREE study","authors":"Katrina Davis , Sevil Yasar","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100769","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100769","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 100769"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bone quality response to lifestyle intervention in older adults with obesity (LIMB-Q trial): a randomised controlled trial 老年肥胖患者骨质量对生活方式干预的反应(LIMB-Q试验):一项随机对照试验。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100761
Giulia Gregori MS , Sanjay Mediwala MD , Michael Liebschner PhD , Daeseung Kim PhD , Mon S Bryant PhD PT , Nina Klonis BS , Prof Reina Armamento-Villareal MD , Prof Clifford Qualls PhD , Prof Dennis T Villareal MD

Background

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss might exacerbate age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. However, there is limited knowledge about their effects on bone quality. We examined whether lifestyle intervention can preserve or enhance bone quality, despite reductions in bone mineral density.

Methods

The Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Bone Quality (LIMB-Q) study was a randomised controlled trial conducted at Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center (Houston, TX, USA) including older adults (aged 65–85 years) with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an intensive lifestyle intervention (intensive lifestyle group, consisting of weight management plus exercise training) or healthy lifestyle (healthy lifestyle group, consisting of educational sessions on healthy diets). The co-primary outcomes were 12-month changes in (1) distal tibia cortical thickness, measured using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, and (2) hip bone strength (failure load), assessed via finite element analysis of CT scans. The primary endpoint was analysed by intention to treat (all randomly assigned patients). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03329963 (completed).

Findings

Of 138 participants assessed for eligibility in person between Nov 9, 2017, and Nov 8, 2021, 120 were included in this study (mean age 71·4 years [SD 4·6]; 63 [53%] male and 57 [47%] female). At 12 months, weight loss was greater in the intensive lifestyle group than in the healthy lifestyle group (–11·6 kg [SE 0·5] vs –1·2 kg [0·5]). No group differences were noted in the change in distal tibia cortical thickness between the intensive lifestyle group (–0·013 mm [SE 0·026]) and the healthy lifestyle group (–0·002 mm [0·025]; between-group difference 0·027 [95% CI –0·066 to 0·120], p=0·40). The change in hip failure load at 12 months did not differ between the intensive lifestyle group (13 N [SE 25]) and the healthy lifestyle group (3 N [26]; between-group difference –6.9 N [95% CI –108 to 95], p=0·89). Exercise-related adverse events in the intensive lifestyle group included a small number of musculoskeletal events (falls [one participant], neck pain [two], and foot, shoulder, back, and leg pain [one each]).

Interpretation

Lifestyle intervention preserved bone quality in older adults with obesity during weight loss. Further research is needed to determine whether lifestyle interventions can reduce fracture risk in older adults with obesity.

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and US Department of Veterans Affairs.
背景:生活方式干预减肥可能加剧年龄相关性骨质流失和骨质疏松症。然而,关于它们对骨质量的影响的知识有限。我们研究了生活方式干预是否可以在骨密度降低的情况下保持或提高骨质量。方法:生活方式干预改善骨质量(LIMB-Q)研究是在贝勒医学院和Michael E DeBakey VA医学中心(Houston, TX, USA)进行的一项随机对照试验,研究对象为年龄在65-85岁之间的肥胖老年人(BMI≥30 kg/m2)。参与者被随机分配接受强化生活方式干预组(强化生活方式组,包括体重管理和运动训练)或健康生活方式组(健康生活方式组,包括健康饮食教育课程)。共同主要结果是12个月的变化(1)胫骨远端皮质厚度,使用高分辨率外围定量CT测量;(2)髋骨强度(失效载荷),通过CT扫描的有限元分析评估。主要终点通过治疗意向进行分析(所有随机分配的患者)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03329963(已完成)。研究结果:在2017年11月9日至2021年11月8日期间亲自评估资格的138名参与者中,120名参与者被纳入本研究(平均年龄71.4岁[SD 4.6]; 63名[53%]男性,57名[47%]女性)。12个月时,强化生活方式组的体重减轻幅度大于健康生活方式组(- 11.6 kg [SE 0.5] vs -1·2 kg [SE 0.5])。强化生活方式组(- 0.013 mm [SE 0.026])与健康生活方式组(- 0.002 mm[0.025])胫骨远端皮质厚度变化无组间差异,组间差异0.027 [95% CI - 0.066 ~ 0.120], p= 0.40]。12个月时,强化生活方式组(13 N [SE 25])和健康生活方式组(3 N[26])髋关节衰竭负荷变化无差异,组间差异为-6.9 N [95% CI -108 ~ 95], p= 0.89)。强化生活方式组的运动相关不良事件包括少量肌肉骨骼事件(跌倒[1名参与者],颈部疼痛[2名],足部、肩部、背部和腿部疼痛[各1名])。解释:生活方式干预在减肥期间保持了老年肥胖患者的骨质量。需要进一步的研究来确定生活方式干预是否可以降低老年肥胖患者的骨折风险。资助:国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所(NIDDK)和美国退伍军人事务部。
{"title":"Bone quality response to lifestyle intervention in older adults with obesity (LIMB-Q trial): a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Giulia Gregori MS ,&nbsp;Sanjay Mediwala MD ,&nbsp;Michael Liebschner PhD ,&nbsp;Daeseung Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Mon S Bryant PhD PT ,&nbsp;Nina Klonis BS ,&nbsp;Prof Reina Armamento-Villareal MD ,&nbsp;Prof Clifford Qualls PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Dennis T Villareal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100761","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100761","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lifestyle interventions for weight loss might exacerbate age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. However, there is limited knowledge about their effects on bone quality. We examined whether lifestyle intervention can preserve or enhance bone quality, despite reductions in bone mineral density.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Bone Quality (LIMB-Q) study was a randomised controlled trial conducted at Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center (Houston, TX, USA) including older adults (aged 65–85 years) with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an intensive lifestyle intervention (intensive lifestyle group, consisting of weight management plus exercise training) or healthy lifestyle (healthy lifestyle group, consisting of educational sessions on healthy diets). The co-primary outcomes were 12-month changes in (1) distal tibia cortical thickness, measured using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT, and (2) hip bone strength (failure load), assessed via finite element analysis of CT scans. The primary endpoint was analysed by intention to treat (all randomly assigned patients). This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03329963</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (completed).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 138 participants assessed for eligibility in person between Nov 9, 2017, and Nov 8, 2021, 120 were included in this study (mean age 71·4 years [SD 4·6]; 63 [53%] male and 57 [47%] female). At 12 months, weight loss was greater in the intensive lifestyle group than in the healthy lifestyle group (–11·6 kg [SE 0·5] <em>vs</em> –1·2 kg [0·5]). No group differences were noted in the change in distal tibia cortical thickness between the intensive lifestyle group (–0·013 mm [SE 0·026]) and the healthy lifestyle group (–0·002 mm [0·025]; between-group difference 0·027 [95% CI –0·066 to 0·120], p=0·40). The change in hip failure load at 12 months did not differ between the intensive lifestyle group (13 N [SE 25]) and the healthy lifestyle group (3 N [26]; between-group difference –6.9 N [95% CI –108 to 95], p=0·89). Exercise-related adverse events in the intensive lifestyle group included a small number of musculoskeletal events (falls [one participant], neck pain [two], and foot, shoulder, back, and leg pain [one each]).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Lifestyle intervention preserved bone quality in older adults with obesity during weight loss. Further research is needed to determine whether lifestyle interventions can reduce fracture risk in older adults with obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and US Department of Veterans Affairs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 100761"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 单领域和多领域生活方式干预预防认知功能未受损老年人认知能力下降:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100762
Augusto J Mendes PhD , Federica Ribaldi PhD , Ozge Sayin MSc , Giorgi Khachvani MD , Roberta Mulargia MD , Gabriele Volpara MA , Giulia Remoli MD , Umberto Nencha MD , Stefano Gianonni-Luza MD , Stefano Cappa MD , Giovanni B Frisoni MD

Background

Preventing cognitive impairment in older adults is a public health priority. Although multidomain interventions have shown promise as preventive strategies, the optimal combination of interventions remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare and rank the relative efficacy of single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive impairment in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired.

Methods

We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed and Embase from inception until the date of our search on May 7, 2024 following a preregistered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024601975). We included RCTs in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired evaluating lifestyle interventions targeting diet, physical exercise, cognitive training, social activity, and health education, either alone or in combination. The primary outcome was global cognition, analysed using random-effects network meta-analysis, reporting standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs, and compared against health education, active control, or no intervention. Subgroup analyses explored potential age-related differences and the effect of intervention duration. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and publication bias was evaluated by assessing funnel plot asymmetry.

Findings

Of the 10 200 citations identified and 1183 full texts screened for eligibility, we identified 109 eligible RCTs, including 23 010 participants (median age 70·1 years [IQR 68·7–73·8], 14 957 [65%] female and 8053 [35%] male). Compared with health education, significant improvements in global cognition were found for physical exercise and cognitive training combined (SMD 0·26 [95% CI 0·10–0·42; p=0·0011); cognitive training alone (SMD 0·21 [0·08–0·33]; p=0·00092); diet, physical exercise, cognitive training, and health education combined (SMD 0·14 [0·02–0·27]; p=0·028); and physical exercise alone (SMD 0·14 [0·05–0·22]; p=0·0014). Random-effects models using active control and no intervention as comparators yielded similarly significant effects for the aforementioned interventions, with effect sizes in the same order. Risk of bias was high in 44 (40%) studies, and publication bias was suggested in studies comparing interventions with health education.

Interpretation

Several single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions are efficacious at modulating global cognition in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired, with the combination of physical exercise and cognitive training demonstrating the strongest effect. Combining lifestyle interventions might enhance efficacy, but increased number of domains does not automatically translate into greater cognitive benefits. These findings support lifestyle interventions as key components of prevention strategies; however, the
背景:预防老年人认知障碍是一个公共卫生重点。尽管多领域干预已显示出作为预防策略的希望,但干预措施的最佳组合仍不清楚。本网络荟萃分析旨在比较和排名单一领域和多领域生活方式干预预防认知功能障碍的老年人认知功能障碍的相对疗效。方法:我们对发表在PubMed和Embase上的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析,从开始到我们的检索日期(2024年5月7日),遵循PROSPERO (CRD42024601975)的预注册方案。我们纳入了认知未受损的老年人的随机对照试验,评估以饮食、体育锻炼、认知训练、社会活动和健康教育为目标的生活方式干预措施,无论是单独的还是联合的。主要结局是整体认知,使用随机效应网络荟萃分析分析,报告标准化平均差异(SMDs)和95% ci,并与健康教育、积极控制或无干预进行比较。亚组分析探讨了潜在的年龄相关差异和干预时间的影响。偏倚风险采用Cochrane Risk of bias 2评估,发表偏倚采用漏斗图不对称评估。结果:在纳入筛选的10200篇引文和1183篇全文中,我们筛选出109篇符合条件的rct,包括23 010名参与者(中位年龄为70.1岁[IQR为68.7 - 73.8],14 957名[65%]女性,8053名[35%]男性)。与健康教育相比,体育锻炼和认知训练相结合对整体认知有显著改善(SMD = 0.26 [95% CI = 0.10 - 0.42; p= 0.0011);单纯认知训练(SMD = 0.21 [0.08 - 0.33]; p= 0.00092);饮食、体育锻炼、认知训练和健康教育相结合(SMD = 0.14 [0.02 - 0.27]; p= 0.028);单纯体育锻炼(SMD = 0.14 [0.05 - 0.22]; p= 0.0014)。采用主动控制和不干预作为比较的随机效应模型对上述干预产生了同样显著的效果,效果大小顺序相同。44项(40%)研究存在高偏倚风险,在比较干预措施与健康教育的研究中存在发表偏倚。解释:几种单一领域和多领域的生活方式干预在调节认知未受损老年人的全球认知方面是有效的,其中体育锻炼和认知训练的结合显示出最强的效果。结合生活方式干预可能会提高疗效,但领域数量的增加并不会自动转化为更大的认知益处。这些发现支持生活方式干预是预防策略的关键组成部分;然而,它们的最佳组合需要进一步研究。资金:没有。
{"title":"Single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Augusto J Mendes PhD ,&nbsp;Federica Ribaldi PhD ,&nbsp;Ozge Sayin MSc ,&nbsp;Giorgi Khachvani MD ,&nbsp;Roberta Mulargia MD ,&nbsp;Gabriele Volpara MA ,&nbsp;Giulia Remoli MD ,&nbsp;Umberto Nencha MD ,&nbsp;Stefano Gianonni-Luza MD ,&nbsp;Stefano Cappa MD ,&nbsp;Giovanni B Frisoni MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100762","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100762","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preventing cognitive impairment in older adults is a public health priority. Although multidomain interventions have shown promise as preventive strategies, the optimal combination of interventions remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare and rank the relative efficacy of single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive impairment in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed and Embase from inception until the date of our search on May 7, 2024 following a preregistered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024601975). We included RCTs in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired evaluating lifestyle interventions targeting diet, physical exercise, cognitive training, social activity, and health education, either alone or in combination. The primary outcome was global cognition, analysed using random-effects network meta-analysis, reporting standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs, and compared against health education, active control, or no intervention. Subgroup analyses explored potential age-related differences and the effect of intervention duration. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and publication bias was evaluated by assessing funnel plot asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of the 10 200 citations identified and 1183 full texts screened for eligibility, we identified 109 eligible RCTs, including 23 010 participants (median age 70·1 years [IQR 68·7–73·8], 14 957 [65%] female and 8053 [35%] male). Compared with health education, significant improvements in global cognition were found for physical exercise and cognitive training combined (SMD 0·26 [95% CI 0·10–0·42; p=0·0011); cognitive training alone (SMD 0·21 [0·08–0·33]; p=0·00092); diet, physical exercise, cognitive training, and health education combined (SMD 0·14 [0·02–0·27]; p=0·028); and physical exercise alone (SMD 0·14 [0·05–0·22]; p=0·0014). Random-effects models using active control and no intervention as comparators yielded similarly significant effects for the aforementioned interventions, with effect sizes in the same order. Risk of bias was high in 44 (40%) studies, and publication bias was suggested in studies comparing interventions with health education.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Several single-domain and multidomain lifestyle interventions are efficacious at modulating global cognition in older adults who are cognitively unimpaired, with the combination of physical exercise and cognitive training demonstrating the strongest effect. Combining lifestyle interventions might enhance efficacy, but increased number of domains does not automatically translate into greater cognitive benefits. These findings support lifestyle interventions as key components of prevention strategies; however, the","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 100762"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of hip fracture on survival, disability, pain, and health-related quality of life in Zimbabwe: a prospective cohort study 津巴布韦髋部骨折对生存、残疾、疼痛和健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100766
Mohamad I Nasser PhD , Anya Burton PhD , Hannah Wilson PhD , Tadios Manyanga MSc , Tafadzwa Madanhire PhD , Prudance Mushayavanhu FCS Orthopaedics , Munyaradzi Ndekwere FCS Orthopaedics , Joseph Chipanga , Samuel Hawley PhD , Simon Matthew Graham PhD , James Masters PhD , Kate A Ward PhD , Matthew L Costa PhD , Rashida A Ferrand PhD , Celia L Gregson FRCP

Background

The population in Africa is ageing, and fragility fractures increasing. We assessed 1-year health outcomes following hip fracture in older adults in Zimbabwe.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, a cohort of adults aged 40 years or older with hip fracture, presenting to hospitals in Harare (two public and five private hospitals) between Oct 15, 2021, and Oct 14, 2022, were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome was survival, analysed with Kaplan–Meier curves at different timepoints (30 days, 120 days, 6–8 months, and 12 months after case identification), overall and stratified by age (<70 years vs ≥70 years), delay to presentation (no delay [≤2 weeks] vs delay [>2 weeks]), and facility type and operative management. We also quantified health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), hip pain, self-reported from 0 (none) to 5 (all the time) and measured as interference with walking and sleep (1 [no interference] to 10 [complete interference]), as per the Brief Pain Inventory, and disability, measured with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule version 2.0 (WHODAS).

Findings

Of 196 patients with hip fracture (96 [49%] female, 100 [51%] male; median age 74 years [IQR 62·5–83]), 162 (83%) had had a fragility fracture (low-energy trauma). In total, 173 (88%) were managed in a public hospital, of whom 96 (55%) received operative hip fixation. In contrast, all of the 23 (12%) managed in private facilities had an operation. After 12 months, 55 (29%) had died (49 [42%] of 117 patients aged ≥70 years, and six [9%] of 70 patients aged <70 years). In public hospitals, 31 (42%) of 73 non-operated patients died, compared with 18 (19%) of 93 patients who were operated on. Overall, survival declined to 88% (95% CI 82–92) by 30 days and to 71% (64–77) by 12 months. The probability of survival was lower in patients aged 70 years or older than in those younger than 70 years (mortality hazard ratio for ≥70 years 6·10, 95% CI 2·61−14·22). The mean HRQoL utility score decreased from 0·81 (95% CI 0·80–0·83) pre-fracture to 0·29 (0·25–0·34) at 30 days post fracture. Minimal recovery was seen after 120 days (0·34, 0·29–0·39). By 12 months, 97 (97%) of 100 patients alive and able to provide data still reported pain from their hip injury. Post-fracture disability was almost universal, with only two (2%) of 100 patients being disability-free (WHODAS=0) by 12 months.

Interpretation

Following hip fracture, survival and quality of life decreased substantially in the study population. These findings reveal the need for the implementation of guidelines to standardise care and improve operative capacity to manage the predicted rise in fractures in this region.

Funding

Wellcome Trust.
背景:非洲人口正在老龄化,脆弱性骨折日益增加。我们评估了津巴布韦老年人髋部骨折后1年的健康结果。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,研究人员对2021年10月15日至2022年10月14日期间在哈拉雷医院(两家公立医院和五家私立医院)就诊的40岁及以上髋部骨折的成年人进行了为期12个月的随访。主要终点是生存率,通过Kaplan-Meier曲线在不同时间点(病例确诊后30天、120天、6-8个月和12个月)、总体和分层年龄(2周)、设施类型和手术管理进行分析。我们还量化了与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL),用5级EQ-5D (EQ-5D- 5l)来测量,髋关节疼痛,自我报告从0(无)到5(一直),并根据简要疼痛量表测量行走和睡眠的干扰(1[无干扰]到10[完全干扰]),以及残疾,用世卫组织残疾评估表2.0版(WHODAS)来测量。结果:196例髋部骨折患者(女性96例[49%],男性100例[51%],中位年龄74岁[IQR 65.2 -83])中,有162例(83%)发生脆性骨折(低能量创伤)。共有173例(88%)在公立医院接受治疗,其中96例(55%)接受手术髋关节固定。相比之下,在私营机构管理的23家医院(12%)都进行了手术。12个月后,117例年龄≥70岁的患者中有49例(42%)死亡,70例年龄≥70岁的患者中有6例(9%)死亡。这些发现表明,需要实施指南,以规范护理和提高手术能力,以管理该地区骨折的预测上升。资助:惠康信托基金。
{"title":"Impact of hip fracture on survival, disability, pain, and health-related quality of life in Zimbabwe: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Mohamad I Nasser PhD ,&nbsp;Anya Burton PhD ,&nbsp;Hannah Wilson PhD ,&nbsp;Tadios Manyanga MSc ,&nbsp;Tafadzwa Madanhire PhD ,&nbsp;Prudance Mushayavanhu FCS Orthopaedics ,&nbsp;Munyaradzi Ndekwere FCS Orthopaedics ,&nbsp;Joseph Chipanga ,&nbsp;Samuel Hawley PhD ,&nbsp;Simon Matthew Graham PhD ,&nbsp;James Masters PhD ,&nbsp;Kate A Ward PhD ,&nbsp;Matthew L Costa PhD ,&nbsp;Rashida A Ferrand PhD ,&nbsp;Celia L Gregson FRCP","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100766","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100766","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The population in Africa is ageing, and fragility fractures increasing. We assessed 1-year health outcomes following hip fracture in older adults in Zimbabwe.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective cohort study, a cohort of adults aged 40 years or older with hip fracture, presenting to hospitals in Harare (two public and five private hospitals) between Oct 15, 2021, and Oct 14, 2022, were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome was survival, analysed with Kaplan–Meier curves at different timepoints (30 days, 120 days, 6–8 months, and 12 months after case identification), overall and stratified by age (&lt;70 years <em>vs</em> ≥70 years), delay to presentation (no delay [≤2 weeks] <em>vs</em> delay [&gt;2 weeks]), and facility type and operative management. We also quantified health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), hip pain, self-reported from 0 (none) to 5 (all the time) and measured as interference with walking and sleep (1 [no interference] to 10 [complete interference]), as per the Brief Pain Inventory, and disability, measured with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule version 2.0 (WHODAS).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 196 patients with hip fracture (96 [49%] female, 100 [51%] male; median age 74 years [IQR 62·5–83]), 162 (83%) had had a fragility fracture (low-energy trauma). In total, 173 (88%) were managed in a public hospital, of whom 96 (55%) received operative hip fixation. In contrast, all of the 23 (12%) managed in private facilities had an operation. After 12 months, 55 (29%) had died (49 [42%] of 117 patients aged ≥70 years, and six [9%] of 70 patients aged &lt;70 years). In public hospitals, 31 (42%) of 73 non-operated patients died, compared with 18 (19%) of 93 patients who were operated on. Overall, survival declined to 88% (95% CI 82–92) by 30 days and to 71% (64–77) by 12 months. The probability of survival was lower in patients aged 70 years or older than in those younger than 70 years (mortality hazard ratio for ≥70 years 6·10, 95% CI 2·61−14·22). The mean HRQoL utility score decreased from 0·81 (95% CI 0·80–0·83) pre-fracture to 0·29 (0·25–0·34) at 30 days post fracture. Minimal recovery was seen after 120 days (0·34, 0·29–0·39). By 12 months, 97 (97%) of 100 patients alive and able to provide data still reported pain from their hip injury. Post-fracture disability was almost universal, with only two (2%) of 100 patients being disability-free (WHODAS=0) by 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Following hip fracture, survival and quality of life decreased substantially in the study population. These findings reveal the need for the implementation of guidelines to standardise care and improve operative capacity to manage the predicted rise in fractures in this region.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Wellcome Trust.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 100766"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive decline before and after mid-to-late-life smoking cessation: a longitudinal analysis of prospective cohort studies from 12 countries 中老年戒烟前后认知能力下降:来自12个国家前瞻性队列研究的纵向分析
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100753
Mikaela Bloomberg PhD , Prof Jamie Brown PhD , Giorgio Di Gessa PhD , Feifei Bu PhD , Prof Andrew Steptoe DSc

Background

Whether short-term improvements in cognitive performance observed following smoking cessation are transient or if longer-term cognitive trajectories are also improved is unclear, particularly when adults are middle-aged or older at smoking cessation. We examined whether long-term cognitive trajectories improved following mid-to-late-life smoking cessation.

Methods

In this longitudinal study, we used data from three nationally representative cohort studies from 12 countries including 18 years of cognitive data (2002–20). Participants who quit smoking during follow-up were matched with an equal number of continuing smokers according to key demographic, socioeconomic, and cognitive criteria. We used piecewise linear mixed models to examine memory and fluency decline before and after smoking cessation and during a comparable time period in continuing smokers.

Findings

We included data from 9436 participants who smoked (4718 [50·0%] smokers who quit matched with 4718 [50·0%] continuing smokers, aged 40–89 years, with 4886 [51·8%] women and 4550 [48·2%] men). In the six years before smoking cessation, matched smokers who quit and continuing smokers had similar rates of memory and fluency decline (difference in memory decline [smokers who quit–continuing smokers] –0·03 SDs [95% CI –0·06 to 0·01], p=0·16; difference in fluency decline –0·01 [–0·04 to 0·03], p=0·76). In the six years following smoking cessation, smokers who quit had memory and fluency scores that declined more slowly than continuing smokers (difference in memory decline 0·05 SDs [0·00–0·10], p=0·036; difference in fluency decline 0·05 SDs [0·01–0·10], p=0·030). Coefficients for interaction with age at smoking cessation suggested results did not differ by age at smoking cessation (p>0·05 for all).

Interpretation

In middle-aged and older smokers with initially similar cognitive trajectories, smokers who quit subsequently had more favourable trajectories than continuing smokers regardless of age at cessation. As older adults are less likely than younger people to attempt smoking cessation, improvements in long-term cognitive trajectories might provide an additional motivation to quit.

Funding

National Institute on Aging, National Institute for Health and Care Research.
背景:目前尚不清楚戒烟后观察到的认知能力的短期改善是短暂的,还是长期的认知轨迹也得到了改善,特别是当成年人在戒烟时是中年或老年时。我们研究了长期认知轨迹是否在中老年戒烟后得到改善。方法:在这项纵向研究中,我们使用了来自12个国家的三个具有全国代表性的队列研究的数据,包括18年的认知数据(2002-20)。根据关键的人口统计学、社会经济和认知标准,在随访期间戒烟的参与者与同等数量的继续吸烟者相匹配。我们使用分段线性混合模型来检查戒烟前后和持续吸烟者在可比时间段内的记忆力和流畅性下降。结果:我们纳入了9436名吸烟参与者的数据(4718名[50.0%]戒烟者与4718名[50.0%]持续吸烟者相匹配,年龄在40-89岁之间,其中4886名[51.8%]女性和4550名[48.2%]男性)。在戒烟前6年,匹配的戒烟者和继续吸烟者的记忆力和流畅性下降率相似(记忆下降差异[戒烟者-继续吸烟者]- 0.03 SDs [95% CI - 0.06 ~ 0.01], p= 0.16;流畅性下降差异- 0.01 [- 0.04 ~ 0.03],p= 0.76)。在戒烟后的6年里,戒烟者的记忆和流畅性得分比继续吸烟者下降得更慢(记忆下降差异0.05 SDs[0·00-0·10],p=0·036;流畅性下降差异0.05 SDs[0·01-0·10],p=0·030)。与戒烟年龄相互作用的系数表明,结果没有因戒烟年龄而异(p < 0.05)。解释:在最初认知轨迹相似的中年和老年吸烟者中,随后戒烟的吸烟者比戒烟时不考虑年龄的持续吸烟者有更有利的轨迹。由于老年人比年轻人更不可能尝试戒烟,长期认知轨迹的改善可能会为戒烟提供额外的动力。资助:国家老龄研究所,国家卫生与保健研究所。
{"title":"Cognitive decline before and after mid-to-late-life smoking cessation: a longitudinal analysis of prospective cohort studies from 12 countries","authors":"Mikaela Bloomberg PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jamie Brown PhD ,&nbsp;Giorgio Di Gessa PhD ,&nbsp;Feifei Bu PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Andrew Steptoe DSc","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100753","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Whether short-term improvements in cognitive performance observed following smoking cessation are transient or if longer-term cognitive trajectories are also improved is unclear, particularly when adults are middle-aged or older at smoking cessation. We examined whether long-term cognitive trajectories improved following mid-to-late-life smoking cessation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this longitudinal study, we used data from three nationally representative cohort studies from 12 countries including 18 years of cognitive data (2002–20). Participants who quit smoking during follow-up were matched with an equal number of continuing smokers according to key demographic, socioeconomic, and cognitive criteria. We used piecewise linear mixed models to examine memory and fluency decline before and after smoking cessation and during a comparable time period in continuing smokers.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We included data from 9436 participants who smoked (4718 [50·0%] smokers who quit matched with 4718 [50·0%] continuing smokers, aged 40–89 years, with 4886 [51·8%] women and 4550 [48·2%] men). In the six years before smoking cessation, matched smokers who quit and continuing smokers had similar rates of memory and fluency decline (difference in memory decline [smokers who quit–continuing smokers] –0·03 SDs [95% CI –0·06 to 0·01], p=0·16; difference in fluency decline –0·01 [–0·04 to 0·03], p=0·76). In the six years following smoking cessation, smokers who quit had memory and fluency scores that declined more slowly than continuing smokers (difference in memory decline 0·05 SDs [0·00–0·10], p=0·036; difference in fluency decline 0·05 SDs [0·01–0·10], p=0·030). Coefficients for interaction with age at smoking cessation suggested results did not differ by age at smoking cessation (p&gt;0·05 for all).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In middle-aged and older smokers with initially similar cognitive trajectories, smokers who quit subsequently had more favourable trajectories than continuing smokers regardless of age at cessation. As older adults are less likely than younger people to attempt smoking cessation, improvements in long-term cognitive trajectories might provide an additional motivation to quit.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>National Institute on Aging, National Institute for Health and Care Research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 9","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plant-based dietary patterns and age-specific risk of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases: a prospective analysis 植物性饮食模式与癌症和心脏代谢疾病多发病的年龄特异性风险:一项前瞻性分析
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100742
Reynalda Córdova PhD , Prof Jihye Kim PhD , Alysha S Thompson PhD , Hwayoung Noh PhD , Sanam Shah PhD , Christina C Dahm PhD , Christopher F Jensen MSc , Lene Mellemkjær PhD , Prof Anne Tjønneland PhD , Verena Katzke PhD , Charlotte Le Cornet PhD , Christine El-Khoury MSc , Prof Matthias B Schulze DrPH , Giovanna Masala MD , Claudia Agnoli MSc , Vittorio Simeon PhD , Rosario Tumino PhD , Fulvio Ricceri PhD , Prof W M Monique Verschuren PhD , Prof Yvonne T van der Schouw PhD , Heinz Freisling PhD

Background

It is currently unknown whether plant-based dietary patterns influence disease progression to multimorbidity after an initial non-communicable disease, and whether the associated risk of multimorbidity varies with age. This study aimed to investigate associations of plant-based diets with the risk of multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of at least two chronic diseases in an individual (either cancer at any site, cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes).

Methods

This prospective cohort study used data from EPIC and UK Biobank across six European countries, with participants aged 35–70 years at recruitment. We excluded participants from these cohorts who had cancer, cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes at baseline or those with missing data on diet or health outcomes. Data on dietary habits were assessed either at baseline through a validated dietary questionnaire about habits in the previous 12 months or through several 24-h recall questionnaires during approximately a year of follow-up. Multistate modelling with Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of multimorbidity according to a healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) and, separately, an unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI). Risk differences in adults younger than 60 years and those age 60 years and older were estimated.

Findings

407 618 participants (226 324 from EPIC and 181 294 from UK Biobank) were included in this study. During a median follow-up time of 10·9 years in EPIC and 11·4 years in UK Biobank, 6604 cancer–cardiometabolic multimorbidity events occurred in both cohorts combined. A ten-point increment of the hPDI score was associated with a lower risk of multimorbidity, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·89 (95% CI 0·83–0·96) in EPIC and 0·81 (0·76–0·86) in UK Biobank. This inverse association was marginally weaker in older adults than in middle-aged adults in both cohorts. In UK Biobank, a ten-point increment of the hPDI score was associated with multivariable-adjusted HRs of 0·71 (95% CI 0·65–0·79) in adults younger than 60 years and 0·86 (0·80–0·92) in those aged 60 years and older (pinteraction=0·0016). The respective HRs in EPIC were 0·86 (95% CI 0·78–0·95) and 0·92 (0·84–1·02; pinteraction=0·32). A higher adherence to an unhealthy plant-based diet was positively associated with multimorbidity risk in UK Biobank (HR per ten-point increment of uPDI 1·22, 95% CI 1·16–1·29), but this was not replicated in EPIC (1·00, 0·94–1·08).

Interpretation

A healthy plant-based diet might reduce the burden of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases among middle-aged and older adults.

Funding

The Korean Government (Ministry of Science and ICT).
背景:目前尚不清楚以植物为基础的饮食模式是否会影响非传染性疾病的进展,以及多病的相关风险是否随年龄而变化。本研究旨在调查植物性饮食与多病风险的关系,多病的定义是一个人同时患有至少两种慢性疾病(任何部位的癌症、心血管疾病或2型糖尿病)。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究使用了来自6个欧洲国家的EPIC和UK Biobank的数据,招募时参与者年龄为35-70岁。我们从这些队列中排除了基线时患有癌症、心血管疾病或2型糖尿病或缺乏饮食或健康结果数据的参与者。饮食习惯的数据在基线时通过一份关于前12个月饮食习惯的有效问卷或在大约一年的随访期间通过几份24小时回忆问卷进行评估。采用Cox回归的多状态模型,根据健康植物性饮食指数(hPDI)和不健康植物性饮食指数(uPDI)分别估计多种疾病的风险。对60岁以下和60岁及以上成年人的风险差异进行了评估。研究结果:407618名参与者(来自EPIC的226 324名和来自UK Biobank的181 294名)被纳入本研究。EPIC的中位随访时间为10.9年,UK Biobank的中位随访时间为11.4年,两个队列共发生了6604例癌症-心脏代谢多病事件。hPDI评分增加10分与多病风险降低相关,EPIC的风险比(HR)为0.89 (95% CI 0.83 - 0.96), UK Biobank的风险比(HR)为0.81 (95% CI 0.76 - 0.86)。在两个队列中,老年人的这种负相关比中年人略弱。在UK Biobank中,60岁以下成年人的hPDI评分每增加10分,多变量调整后的hr为0.71 (95% CI为0.65 - 0.79),60岁及以上成年人的hr为0.86 (95% CI为0.80 - 0.92)(p交互作用= 0.0016)。EPIC组的hr分别为0.86 (95% CI 0.78 ~ 0.95)和0.92 (95% CI 0.84 ~ 0.02), p交互作用= 0.32。在UK Biobank中,较高的不健康植物性饮食依从性与多病风险呈正相关(uPDI每增加10个点的HR为1.22,95% CI为1.16 -1·29),但在EPIC中没有得到复制(1.00,0.94 -1·08)。解释:健康的植物性饮食可能会减少中老年人癌症和心脏代谢疾病的多重发病率。资助:韩国政府(科学和信息通信技术部)。
{"title":"Plant-based dietary patterns and age-specific risk of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases: a prospective analysis","authors":"Reynalda Córdova PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jihye Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Alysha S Thompson PhD ,&nbsp;Hwayoung Noh PhD ,&nbsp;Sanam Shah PhD ,&nbsp;Christina C Dahm PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher F Jensen MSc ,&nbsp;Lene Mellemkjær PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Anne Tjønneland PhD ,&nbsp;Verena Katzke PhD ,&nbsp;Charlotte Le Cornet PhD ,&nbsp;Christine El-Khoury MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Matthias B Schulze DrPH ,&nbsp;Giovanna Masala MD ,&nbsp;Claudia Agnoli MSc ,&nbsp;Vittorio Simeon PhD ,&nbsp;Rosario Tumino PhD ,&nbsp;Fulvio Ricceri PhD ,&nbsp;Prof W M Monique Verschuren PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Yvonne T van der Schouw PhD ,&nbsp;Heinz Freisling PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100742","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100742","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is currently unknown whether plant-based dietary patterns influence disease progression to multimorbidity after an initial non-communicable disease, and whether the associated risk of multimorbidity varies with age. This study aimed to investigate associations of plant-based diets with the risk of multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of at least two chronic diseases in an individual (either cancer at any site, cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study used data from EPIC and UK Biobank across six European countries, with participants aged 35–70 years at recruitment. We excluded participants from these cohorts who had cancer, cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes at baseline or those with missing data on diet or health outcomes. Data on dietary habits were assessed either at baseline through a validated dietary questionnaire about habits in the previous 12 months or through several 24-h recall questionnaires during approximately a year of follow-up. Multistate modelling with Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of multimorbidity according to a healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) and, separately, an unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI). Risk differences in adults younger than 60 years and those age 60 years and older were estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>407 618 participants (226 324 from EPIC and 181 294 from UK Biobank) were included in this study. During a median follow-up time of 10·9 years in EPIC and 11·4 years in UK Biobank, 6604 cancer–cardiometabolic multimorbidity events occurred in both cohorts combined. A ten-point increment of the hPDI score was associated with a lower risk of multimorbidity, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·89 (95% CI 0·83–0·96) in EPIC and 0·81 (0·76–0·86) in UK Biobank. This inverse association was marginally weaker in older adults than in middle-aged adults in both cohorts. In UK Biobank, a ten-point increment of the hPDI score was associated with multivariable-adjusted HRs of 0·71 (95% CI 0·65–0·79) in adults younger than 60 years and 0·86 (0·80–0·92) in those aged 60 years and older (p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·0016). The respective HRs in EPIC were 0·86 (95% CI 0·78–0·95) and 0·92 (0·84–1·02; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·32). A higher adherence to an unhealthy plant-based diet was positively associated with multimorbidity risk in UK Biobank (HR per ten-point increment of uPDI 1·22, 95% CI 1·16–1·29), but this was not replicated in EPIC (1·00, 0·94–1·08).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>A healthy plant-based diet might reduce the burden of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases among middle-aged and older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The Korean Government (Ministry of Science and ICT).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 8","pages":"Article 100742"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening and management of frailty among people experiencing homelessness 筛查和管理无家可归者的脆弱性。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100760
Salmaan Z Kamal , Katherine Diaz Vickery
{"title":"Screening and management of frailty among people experiencing homelessness","authors":"Salmaan Z Kamal ,&nbsp;Katherine Diaz Vickery","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100760","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100760","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 8","pages":"Article 100760"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recognising frailty throughout adulthood 认识到整个成年期的脆弱。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100765
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
{"title":"Recognising frailty throughout adulthood","authors":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100765","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 8","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applicability of the electronic frailty index in younger and older adults in England: a population-based cohort study 电子衰弱指数在英国年轻人和老年人中的适用性:一项基于人群的队列研究。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100752
Daniel R Morales PhD , Prof Bruce Guthrie PhD , Thomas J Downes MPhil , Prof David A McAllister MD , Peter Hanlon PhD

Background

The electronic frailty index (eFI) was developed in older adults (aged ≥65 years). There are currently no validated frailty scores in clinical practice for younger adults (aged 18–64 years). The aim of this study was to examine whether the eFI score in younger adults had similar or different associations with adverse health outcomes compared with older adults.

Methods

In this population-based cohort study, electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database were analysed. We used a cross-section of patients on Nov 30, 2015, who were alive and had been registered with a general practice for at least 2 years before data capture. Patients were stratified into younger adults (aged 18–64 years, n=708 235; 49·4% female) and older adults (aged 65–95 years, n=231 819; 54·3% female). For all included patients, eFI score, prevalence of individual eFI deficits, and eFI frailty category were calculated. For the main outcomes, crude and age–sex adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for 1-year and 3-year mortality and emergency hospitalisation for each group compared with adults defined by the eFI as fit.

Findings

The prevalence of eFI-defined frailty was higher in older adults than younger adults. Specifically, in older adults, 77 290 (33·3%) of 231 819 had mild frailty, 44 523 (19·2%) had moderate frailty, and 22 572 (9·7%) had severe frailty. For younger adults, 76 991 (10·9%) of 708 235 had mild frailty, 12 552 (1·8%) had moderate frailty, and 2088 (0·3%) had severe frailty. Adjusted HRs for both 1-year mortality and 1-year emergency hospitalisation in younger adults with mild, moderate, and severe frailty were greater than in older adults with equivalent frailty categorisation. Specifically, compared with fit older adults, age–sex adjusted 1-year mortality HRs were 1·94 (95% CI 1·80–2·09) in older adults with mild frailty, 2·99 (2·77–3·22) with moderate frailty, and 4·03 (3·72–4·36) with severe frailty. Compared with fit younger adults, age–sex adjusted 1-year mortality HRs were 3·15 (2·80–3·55) in younger adults with mild frailty, 5·88 (4·95–6·98) with moderate frailty, and 12·61 (9·76–16·30) with severe frailty (Z score p<0·001 for all comparisons). Compared with fit older adults, age–sex adjusted HRs for 1-year emergency hospitalisation were 2·30 (2·22–2·39) in older adults with mild frailty, 4·09 (3·94–4·25) with moderate frailty, and 6·76 (6·50–7·03) with severe frailty. Compared with fit younger adults, age–sex adjusted HRs for 1-year emergency hospitalisation were 3·16 (3·07–3·25) in younger adults with mild frailty, 6·64 (6·34–6·94) with moderate frailty, and 13·02 (12·04–14·09) with severe frailty (Z score p<0·001 for all comparisons). Similar associations were observed for 3-year mortality and emergency hospitalisation.

Interpretation

Similarly to older adults, the eFI identifies you
背景:电子衰弱指数(eFI)是在老年人(年龄≥65岁)中开发的。目前在临床实践中还没有针对年轻人(18-64岁)的有效虚弱评分。本研究的目的是研究与老年人相比,年轻人的eFI评分与不良健康结果是否有相似或不同的关联。方法:在这项基于人群的队列研究中,分析了来自英国临床实践研究数据链GOLD数据库的电子健康记录。我们使用了2015年11月30日的患者横截面,这些患者在数据采集前至少在全科诊所注册了2年。患者分为青壮年(18-64岁,n=708 235,女性49.4%)和老年(65-95岁,n=231 819,女性54.3%)。对于所有纳入的患者,计算eFI评分、个体eFI缺陷患病率和eFI虚弱类别。对于主要结局,计算各组1年和3年死亡率和紧急住院率的粗风险比(hr),并与eFI定义的成人进行比较。结果:efi定义的衰弱在老年人中的患病率高于年轻人。在老年人中,231 819人中有77 290人(33.3%)为轻度虚弱,44 523人(19.2%)为中度虚弱,22 572人(9.7%)为重度虚弱。在年轻人中,708 235人中有76 991人(10.9%)为轻度虚弱,12 552人(1.8%)为中度虚弱,2088人(0.3%)为重度虚弱。有轻度、中度和重度虚弱的年轻成人的1年死亡率和1年急诊住院的调整hr大于有相同虚弱分类的老年人。具体而言,与健康老年人相比,轻度虚弱老年人经年龄性别调整后的1年死亡率hr为1.94 (95% CI为1.8 -2·09),中度虚弱老年人为2.99 (95% CI为2.77 - 3.22),重度虚弱老年人为4.03 (95% CI为3.72 - 3.36)。与健康的年轻人相比,年龄性别调整后的1年死亡率hr为轻度虚弱的年轻人3.15(2.80 - 3.55),中度虚弱的年轻人5.88(4.95 - 5.98),严重虚弱的年轻人12.61 (9.76 - 16.30)(Z评分)。解释:与老年人相似,eFI识别出虚弱的年轻人具有高死亡率和急诊住院风险。eFI可能是一种识别个体以进行进一步评估和干预的工具。资助:惠康信托基金和首席科学家办公室。
{"title":"Applicability of the electronic frailty index in younger and older adults in England: a population-based cohort study","authors":"Daniel R Morales PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Bruce Guthrie PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas J Downes MPhil ,&nbsp;Prof David A McAllister MD ,&nbsp;Peter Hanlon PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100752","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100752","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The electronic frailty index (eFI) was developed in older adults (aged ≥65 years). There are currently no validated frailty scores in clinical practice for younger adults (aged 18–64 years). The aim of this study was to examine whether the eFI score in younger adults had similar or different associations with adverse health outcomes compared with older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this population-based cohort study, electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database were analysed. We used a cross-section of patients on Nov 30, 2015, who were alive and had been registered with a general practice for at least 2 years before data capture. Patients were stratified into younger adults (aged 18–64 years, n=708 235; 49·4% female) and older adults (aged 65–95 years, n=231 819; 54·3% female). For all included patients, eFI score, prevalence of individual eFI deficits, and eFI frailty category were calculated. For the main outcomes, crude and age–sex adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for 1-year and 3-year mortality and emergency hospitalisation for each group compared with adults defined by the eFI as fit.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The prevalence of eFI-defined frailty was higher in older adults than younger adults. Specifically, in older adults, 77 290 (33·3%) of 231 819 had mild frailty, 44 523 (19·2%) had moderate frailty, and 22 572 (9·7%) had severe frailty. For younger adults, 76 991 (10·9%) of 708 235 had mild frailty, 12 552 (1·8%) had moderate frailty, and 2088 (0·3%) had severe frailty. Adjusted HRs for both 1-year mortality and 1-year emergency hospitalisation in younger adults with mild, moderate, and severe frailty were greater than in older adults with equivalent frailty categorisation. Specifically, compared with fit older adults, age–sex adjusted 1-year mortality HRs were 1·94 (95% CI 1·80–2·09) in older adults with mild frailty, 2·99 (2·77–3·22) with moderate frailty, and 4·03 (3·72–4·36) with severe frailty. Compared with fit younger adults, age–sex adjusted 1-year mortality HRs were 3·15 (2·80–3·55) in younger adults with mild frailty, 5·88 (4·95–6·98) with moderate frailty, and 12·61 (9·76–16·30) with severe frailty (Z score p&lt;0·001 for all comparisons). Compared with fit older adults, age–sex adjusted HRs for 1-year emergency hospitalisation were 2·30 (2·22–2·39) in older adults with mild frailty, 4·09 (3·94–4·25) with moderate frailty, and 6·76 (6·50–7·03) with severe frailty. Compared with fit younger adults, age–sex adjusted HRs for 1-year emergency hospitalisation were 3·16 (3·07–3·25) in younger adults with mild frailty, 6·64 (6·34–6·94) with moderate frailty, and 13·02 (12·04–14·09) with severe frailty (Z score p&lt;0·001 for all comparisons). Similar associations were observed for 3-year mortality and emergency hospitalisation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Similarly to older adults, the eFI identifies you","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 8","pages":"Article 100752"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances in our understanding of how to prevent suicide in older men 我们对如何预防老年男性自杀的理解取得了进展。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100758
Stuart Leske , Kylie King
{"title":"Advances in our understanding of how to prevent suicide in older men","authors":"Stuart Leske ,&nbsp;Kylie King","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100758","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100758","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 8","pages":"Article 100758"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1