首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Healthy Longevity最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5: 552–562 Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5: 552-562 更正。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.08.002
{"title":"Correction to Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5: 552–562","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 9","pages":"Article 100633"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001594/pdfft?md5=6cdd1adeb80a30dcff492e13d446b578&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001594-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combating dementia: the imperative for population-level interventions 防治痴呆症:必须采取全民干预措施。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.014
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
{"title":"Combating dementia: the imperative for population-level interventions","authors":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 9","pages":"Article 100631"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001491/pdfft?md5=9b42b7b1b87a4a7b4fa256586232d670&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001491-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between surgical admissions, cognition, and neurodegeneration in older people: a population-based study from the UK Biobank 老年人手术入院、认知能力和神经退行性病变之间的关系:基于英国生物库的人口研究。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.006
Jennifer Taylor PhD , Kristy P Robledo PhD , Vicente Medel PhD , Prof Gillian Heller PhD , Thomas Payne MD , Jordan Wehrman PhD , Cameron Casey PhD , Phillip F Yang MBBS MS , Bryan M Krause PhD , Richard Lennertz MD PhD , Prof Sharon Naismith DPsych , Prof Armando Teixeira-Pinto PhD , Prof Robert D Sanders MBBS PhD

Background

Previous studies have shown that major surgical and medical hospital admissions are associated with cognitive decline in older people (aged 40–69 years at recruitment), which is concerning for patients and caregivers. We aimed to validate these findings in a large cohort and investigate associations with neurodegeneration using MRI.

Methods

For this population-based study, we analysed data from the UK Biobank collected from March 13, 2006, to July 16, 2023, linked to the National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics database, excluding participants with dementia diagnoses. We constructed fully adjusted models that included age, time, sex, Lancet Commission dementia risk factors, stroke, and hospital admissions with a participant random effect. Primary outcomes were hippocampal volume and white matter hyperintensities, both of which are established markers of neurodegeneration, and exploratory analyses investigated the cortical thickness of Desikan–Killiany–Tourville atlas regions. The main cognitive outcomes were reaction time, fluid intelligence, and prospective and numeric memory. Surgeries were calculated cumulatively starting from 8 years before the baseline evaluation.

Findings

Of 502 412 participants in the UK Biobank study, 492 802 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study, of whom 46 706 underwent MRI. Small adverse associations with cognition were found per surgery: reaction time increased by 0·273 ms, fluid intelligence score decreased by 0·057 correct responses, prospective memory (scored as correct at first attempt) decreased (odds ratio 0·96 [95% CI 0·95 to 0·97]), and numeric memory maximum correct matches decreased by 0·025 in fully adjusted models. Surgeries were associated with smaller hippocampal volume (β=−5·76 mm³ [−7·89 to −3·64]) and greater white matter hyperintensities volume (β=100·02 mm³ [66·17 to 133·87]) in fully adjusted models. Surgeries were also associated with neurodegeneration of the insula and superior temporal cortex.

Interpretation

This population-based study corroborates that surgeries are generally safe but cumulatively are associated with cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Perioperative brain health should be prioritised for older and vulnerable patients, particularly those who have multiple surgical procedures.

Funding

The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Foundation and the University of Sydney.

背景:以前的研究表明,老年人(入院时年龄在 40-69 岁之间)入院接受重大手术和内科治疗与认知能力下降有关,这令患者和护理人员感到担忧。我们的目的是在一个大型队列中验证这些发现,并利用核磁共振成像研究与神经变性的关联:在这项基于人群的研究中,我们分析了英国生物库从 2006 年 3 月 13 日至 2023 年 7 月 16 日收集的数据,这些数据与国民健康服务医院事件统计数据库相连接,但排除了诊断为痴呆症的参与者。我们构建了完全调整模型,其中包括年龄、时间、性别、柳叶刀委员会痴呆症风险因素、中风和入院情况以及参与者随机效应。主要结果是海马体积和白质高密度,两者都是神经退行性变的既定标志,探索性分析调查了 Desikan-Killiany-Tourville 地图集区域的皮质厚度。主要的认知结果包括反应时间、流体智力、前瞻性记忆和数字记忆。手术时间从基线评估前 8 年开始累计计算:在英国生物库研究的 502 412 名参与者中,有 492 802 人符合本研究的要求,其中 46 706 人接受了磁共振成像检查。发现每次手术都会对认知能力产生微小的不利影响:在完全调整模型中,反应时间增加了0-273毫秒,流体智力得分减少了0-057个正确反应,前瞻性记忆(以首次尝试正确率计分)减少了(几率比0-96 [95% CI 0-95至0-97]),数字记忆最大正确匹配数减少了0-025。在完全调整模型中,手术与海马体积缩小(β=-5-76 mm³ [-7-89 to -3-64])和白质增生体积增大(β=100-02 mm³ [66-17 to 133-87])有关。手术还与岛叶和颞上皮层的神经变性有关:这项基于人群的研究证实,手术总体上是安全的,但累积起来会导致认知能力下降和神经变性。围手术期的脑健康应优先考虑年长和易受伤害的患者,尤其是那些接受过多次手术的患者:澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院基金会(ANZCA)和悉尼大学。
{"title":"Association between surgical admissions, cognition, and neurodegeneration in older people: a population-based study from the UK Biobank","authors":"Jennifer Taylor PhD ,&nbsp;Kristy P Robledo PhD ,&nbsp;Vicente Medel PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Gillian Heller PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Payne MD ,&nbsp;Jordan Wehrman PhD ,&nbsp;Cameron Casey PhD ,&nbsp;Phillip F Yang MBBS MS ,&nbsp;Bryan M Krause PhD ,&nbsp;Richard Lennertz MD PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Sharon Naismith DPsych ,&nbsp;Prof Armando Teixeira-Pinto PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Robert D Sanders MBBS PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that major surgical and medical hospital admissions are associated with cognitive decline in older people (aged 40–69 years at recruitment), which is concerning for patients and caregivers. We aimed to validate these findings in a large cohort and investigate associations with neurodegeneration using MRI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this population-based study, we analysed data from the UK Biobank collected from March 13, 2006, to July 16, 2023, linked to the National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics database, excluding participants with dementia diagnoses. We constructed fully adjusted models that included age, time, sex, <em>Lancet</em> Commission dementia risk factors, stroke, and hospital admissions with a participant random effect. Primary outcomes were hippocampal volume and white matter hyperintensities, both of which are established markers of neurodegeneration, and exploratory analyses investigated the cortical thickness of Desikan–Killiany–Tourville atlas regions. The main cognitive outcomes were reaction time, fluid intelligence, and prospective and numeric memory. Surgeries were calculated cumulatively starting from 8 years before the baseline evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of 502 412 participants in the UK Biobank study, 492 802 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study, of whom 46 706 underwent MRI. Small adverse associations with cognition were found per surgery: reaction time increased by 0·273 ms, fluid intelligence score decreased by 0·057 correct responses, prospective memory (scored as correct at first attempt) decreased (odds ratio 0·96 [95% CI 0·95 to 0·97]), and numeric memory maximum correct matches decreased by 0·025 in fully adjusted models. Surgeries were associated with smaller hippocampal volume (β=−5·76 mm³ [−7·89 to −3·64]) and greater white matter hyperintensities volume (β=100·02 mm³ [66·17 to 133·87]) in fully adjusted models. Surgeries were also associated with neurodegeneration of the insula and superior temporal cortex.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This population-based study corroborates that surgeries are generally safe but cumulatively are associated with cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Perioperative brain health should be prioritised for older and vulnerable patients, particularly those who have multiple surgical procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Foundation and the University of Sydney.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 9","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001399/pdfft?md5=bd3cfbe08dfee9f5b21f45c2462307a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001399-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies 24 个国家 50 岁及以上成年人的社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症状的关系:五项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001
Yaping Wang MD , Prof Min Liu PhD , Prof Fude Yang MD , Prof Hongguang Chen MD , Prof Yaogang Wang PhD , Prof Jue Liu PhD
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).
背景:抑郁症是导致精神疾病患者死亡的主要原因。有关社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症之间关系的证据很少。我们旨在确定社会活动和孤独感是否能调节社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关系,以及社会活动、孤独感和社会经济地位对抑郁症的交互或联合关系的程度:在这项基于人群的跨国队列研究中,我们使用了2008年2月15日至2019年2月27日期间24个国家的五项全国代表性调查数据:健康与退休研究(HRS);英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA);欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE);中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS);以及墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)。我们纳入了 50 岁及以上的参与者,他们在基线时报告了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感方面的信息,并且至少接受过两次评估。我们排除了基线时有抑郁症状的参与者、抑郁症状和协变量数据缺失的参与者以及失去随访的参与者。我们使用基于家庭收入、教育和就业状况的潜类分析法将社会经济地位定义为高和低。抑郁症的评估采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)或EURO-D。我们采用 Cox 比例危险模型来估计社会经济地位与抑郁症的关系。我们使用随机效应模型来获得汇总结果。我们探讨了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感对抑郁症的联合效应和交互效应,并使用因果中介分析探讨了社会活动和孤独感在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的中介作用:我们的研究共纳入了 69 160 名参与者,在中位随访 5 年期间,共有 20 237 名参与者患上了抑郁症,总发病率为每 100 人年 7-2 例(95% CI 4-4-10-0)。与社会经济地位高的参与者相比,社会经济地位低的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总危险比 [HR] 1-34; 95% CI 1-23-1-44)。社会经济地位与抑郁之间的关系由社会活动和孤独感介导的比例分别为 6-12% (1-14-28-45) 和 5-54% (0-71-27-62)。我们只观察到社会经济地位和孤独感与抑郁之间存在明显的乘法交互作用(汇总 HR 0-84;0-79-0-90)。与社会经济地位高、社交活跃且不孤独的参与者相比,社会经济地位低、社交不活跃且孤独的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总 HR 2-45;2-08-2-82):社会不活跃和孤独在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关联中起了一小部分正向中介作用,这表明除了针对社会隔离和孤独的干预措施外,还需要其他方法来降低老年人患抑郁症的风险。此外,社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感的共同作用凸显了同时采取综合干预措施以减轻全球抑郁症负担的益处:国家自然科学基金委员会
{"title":"The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies","authors":"Yaping Wang MD ,&nbsp;Prof Min Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Fude Yang MD ,&nbsp;Prof Hongguang Chen MD ,&nbsp;Prof Yaogang Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jue Liu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 9","pages":"Article 100618"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X/pdfft?md5=412aa34e9dea043387eb9d7c218215ac&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400134X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142112843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global barriers to hip-fracture care 髋部骨折护理的全球障碍。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6
Naoko Onizuka , Carmen Quatman
{"title":"Global barriers to hip-fracture care","authors":"Naoko Onizuka ,&nbsp;Carmen Quatman","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00088-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages e510-e511"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000886/pdfft?md5=3a9ca6fcefafd061076cf9811ce4cf88&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000886-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The economic burden of cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke in England in 2018, with projection to 2050: an evaluation of two cohort studies 2018 年英格兰癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风的经济负担以及到 2050 年的预测:对两项队列研究的评估。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9
Filipa Landeiro DPhil , Callum Harris MA BMBCH , David Groves MSc , Samuel O’Neill MBBS , Kuljinder Singh Jandu MBChB , Eliana M C Tacconi DPhil , Samantha Field MSc , Nileema Patel MSc , Anya Göpfert MSc , Hannes Hagson MSc , José Leal DPhil , Ramón Luengo-Fernández DPhil

Background

Cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in England. We aimed to assess the economic burden (including health-care, social care, and informal care costs, as well as productivity losses) of these four conditions in England in 2018, and forecast this cost to 2050 using population projections.

Methods

We used individual patient-level data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, which contains primary care electronic health records of patients from 738 general practices in England, to calculate health-care and residential and nursing home resource use, and data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA) to calculate informal and formal care costs. From CPRD Aurum, we included patients registered on Jan 1, 2018, in a CPRD general practice with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)-linked records, omitting all children younger than 1 year. From ELSA, we included data collected from wave 9 (2018–19). Aggregate English resource use data on morbidity, mortality, and health-care, social care, and informal care were obtained and apportioned, using multivariable regression analyses, to cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke.

Findings

We included 4 161 558 patients from CPRD Aurum with HES-linked data (mean age 41 years [SD 23], with 2 079 679 [50·0%] men and 2 081 879 [50·0%] women) and 8736 patients in ELSA (68 years [11], with 4882 [55·9 %] men and 3854 [44·1%] women). In 2018, the total cost was £18·9 billion (95% CI 18·4–19·4) for cancer, £12·7 billion (12·3–13·0) for coronary heart disease, £11·7 billion (9·6–12·7) for dementia, and £8·6 billion (8·2–9·0) for stroke. Using 2050 English population projections, we estimated that costs would rise by 40% (39–41) for cancer, 54% (53–55) for coronary heart disease, 100% (97–102) for dementia, and 85% (84–86) for stroke, for a total of £26·5 billion (25·7–27·3), £19·6 billion (18·9–20·2), £23·5 billion (19·3–25·3), and £16·0 billion (15·3–16·6), respectively.

Interpretation

This study provides contemporary estimates of the wide-ranging impact of the most important chronic conditions on all aspects of the economy in England. The data will help to inform evidence-based polices to reduce the impact of chronic disease, promoting care access, better health outcomes, and economic sustainability.

Funding

Alzheimer's Research UK.

背景:在英格兰,癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风是导致发病率和死亡率的主要因素。我们旨在评估 2018 年这四种疾病在英格兰造成的经济负担(包括医疗保健、社会护理和非正规护理成本以及生产力损失),并通过人口预测将这一成本预测到 2050 年:我们使用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)Aurum(包含英格兰 738 家全科诊所患者的初级保健电子健康记录)中的患者个人层面数据来计算医疗保健、养老院和护理院的资源使用情况,并使用英格兰老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)中的数据来计算非正式和正式护理成本。从CPRD Aurum中,我们纳入了2018年1月1日在CPRD全科诊所登记并有医院病历统计(HES)链接记录的患者,但省略了所有1岁以下的儿童。从 ELSA 中,我们纳入了第 9 波(2018-19)收集的数据。我们获得了有关发病率、死亡率以及医疗保健、社会护理和非正规护理的英国资源使用汇总数据,并使用多变量回归分析将其分摊到癌症、冠心病、痴呆症和中风中:我们纳入了 4 161 558 名来自 CPRD Aurum 与 HES 相关数据的患者(平均年龄 41 岁 [SD 23],其中男性 2 079 679 [50-0%] ,女性 2 081 879 [50-0%])和 8736 名 ELSA 患者(68 岁 [11],其中男性 4882 [55-9%] ,女性 3854 [44-1%])。2018 年,癌症总成本为 180-90 亿英镑(95% CI 18-4-19-4),冠心病总成本为 120-7 亿英镑(12-3-13-0),痴呆症总成本为 110-7 亿英镑(9-6-12-7),中风总成本为 80-6 亿英镑(8-2-9-0)。根据 2050 年英国人口预测,我们估计癌症费用将增加 40%(39-41),冠心病费用将增加 54%(53-55),痴呆症费用将增加 100%(97-102),中风费用将增加 85%(84-86),总费用分别为 265 亿英镑(25-7-27-3)、196 亿英镑(18-9-20-2)、230-50 亿英镑(19-3-25-3)和 160 亿英镑(15-3-16-6):本研究提供了最重要的慢性疾病对英格兰经济各个方面的广泛影响的当代估算。这些数据将有助于制定以证据为基础的政策,以减少慢性病的影响,促进医疗服务的普及、更好的健康结果和经济可持续性:资金来源:英国阿尔茨海默氏症研究中心。
{"title":"The economic burden of cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke in England in 2018, with projection to 2050: an evaluation of two cohort studies","authors":"Filipa Landeiro DPhil ,&nbsp;Callum Harris MA BMBCH ,&nbsp;David Groves MSc ,&nbsp;Samuel O’Neill MBBS ,&nbsp;Kuljinder Singh Jandu MBChB ,&nbsp;Eliana M C Tacconi DPhil ,&nbsp;Samantha Field MSc ,&nbsp;Nileema Patel MSc ,&nbsp;Anya Göpfert MSc ,&nbsp;Hannes Hagson MSc ,&nbsp;José Leal DPhil ,&nbsp;Ramón Luengo-Fernández DPhil","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00108-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in England. We aimed to assess the economic burden (including health-care, social care, and informal care costs, as well as productivity losses) of these four conditions in England in 2018, and forecast this cost to 2050 using population projections.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used individual patient-level data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, which contains primary care electronic health records of patients from 738 general practices in England, to calculate health-care and residential and nursing home resource use, and data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA) to calculate informal and formal care costs. From CPRD Aurum, we included patients registered on Jan 1, 2018, in a CPRD general practice with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)-linked records, omitting all children younger than 1 year. From ELSA, we included data collected from wave 9 (2018–19). Aggregate English resource use data on morbidity, mortality, and health-care, social care, and informal care were obtained and apportioned, using multivariable regression analyses, to cancer, coronary heart disease, dementia, and stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We included 4 161 558 patients from CPRD Aurum with HES-linked data (mean age 41 years [SD 23], with 2 079 679 [50·0%] men and 2 081 879 [50·0%] women) and 8736 patients in ELSA (68 years [11], with 4882 [55·9 %] men and 3854 [44·1%] women). In 2018, the total cost was £18·9 billion (95% CI 18·4–19·4) for cancer, £12·7 billion (12·3–13·0) for coronary heart disease, £11·7 billion (9·6–12·7) for dementia, and £8·6 billion (8·2–9·0) for stroke. Using 2050 English population projections, we estimated that costs would rise by 40% (39–41) for cancer, 54% (53–55) for coronary heart disease, 100% (97–102) for dementia, and 85% (84–86) for stroke, for a total of £26·5 billion (25·7–27·3), £19·6 billion (18·9–20·2), £23·5 billion (19·3–25·3), and £16·0 billion (15·3–16·6), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study provides contemporary estimates of the wide-ranging impact of the most important chronic conditions on all aspects of the economy in England. The data will help to inform evidence-based polices to reduce the impact of chronic disease, promoting care access, better health outcomes, and economic sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Alzheimer's Research UK.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages e514-e523"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001089/pdfft?md5=e457d0f2af96e04d97c9bfe514b3cebd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001089-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deprescribing for older adults with hypertension at high risk for adverse events: not so fast 对有高不良事件风险的高血压老年人取消处方:没那么快。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003
Nicholas M Pajewski , Mark A Supiano
{"title":"Deprescribing for older adults with hypertension at high risk for adverse events: not so fast","authors":"Nicholas M Pajewski ,&nbsp;Mark A Supiano","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages e512-e513"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001363/pdfft?md5=72266904b1289ce694ba26d8e7b27e71&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001363-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in low-income and middle-income regions: a secondary analysis of data from the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) 低收入和中等收入地区从受伤到进行髋部骨折手术的时间:对国际骨折护理骨科多中心研究(INORMUS)数据的二次分析。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X
Elizabeth Armstrong MPH , Kris Rogers PhD , Chuan Silvia Li MSc , Jagnoor Jagnoor PhD , Paul Moroz MD , Gerald Chukwuemeka Oguzie MD , Samuel Hailu MD , Prof Theodore Miclau III MD , Fernando de la Huerta MD , Jose de Jesus Martinez-Ruiz MD , Fernando Bidolegui MD , Prof Junlin Zhou MD , Prof Xinlong Ma MD , Prof Bo Wu MD , Parag Sancheti PhD , La Ngoc Quang MD , Vali Baigi PhD , Mashyaneh Haddadi MD , Maoyi Tian PhD , Sheila Sprague PhD , Igor A. Escalante Elguezabal
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Globally, fall-related injuries are a substantial problem, and 80% of fatal falls occur in low-income and middle-income countries. We aimed to measure time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in people aged 50 years or older living in low-income and middle-income regions, as well as to measure the proportion of patients with surgical stabilisation of their hip fracture within 72 h of admission to hospital and to identify risk factors associated with surgical delay.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this secondary analysis, we analysed data collected from Africa, Latin America, China, India, and Asia (excluding China and India) for the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) between March 29, 2014, and June 15, 2022. Patients from INORMUS were included in this analysis if they were aged 50 years or older and had an isolated, primary hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall. Staff at participating hospitals identified patients with musculoskeletal injury and referred them for assessment of eligibility. We report time from injury to surgery as three distinct time periods: time from injury to hospital admission, time from admission to surgery, and a total time from injury to surgery. Date and time of injury were self-reported by patients at the time of study recruitment. If time to hospital admission after injury exceeded 24 h, patients reported the primary reason for delayed admission. Reasons for surgery, no surgery, and surgical delay were reported by the treating team. For patients undergoing surgery, multivariable regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for surgical delay.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>4486 adults aged 50 years or older with an isolated, primary hip fracture were enrolled in INORMUS from 55 hospitals in 24 countries. Countries were grouped into five regions: Africa (418 [9·3%] of 4486), Latin America (558 [12·4%]), China (1680 [37·4%]), India (1059 [23·6%]) and Asia (excluding China and India; 771 [17·2%]). Of 4486 patients, 3805 (84·8%) received surgery. The rate of surgery was similar in all regions except in Africa, where only 193 (46·3%) of 418 patients had surgery. Overall, 2791 (62·2%) of 4486 patients were admitted to hospital within 24 h of injury. However, 1019 (22·7%) of 4486 patients had delayed hospital admission of 72 h or more from injury. The two most common reasons for delayed admission of more than 24 h were transfer from another hospital (522 [36·2%] of 1441) and delayed care-seeking because patients thought the injury would heal on its own (480 [33·3%]). Once admitted to hospital, 1451 (38·1%) of 3805 patients who received surgery did so within 72 h (median 4·0 days [IQR 1·7–6·0]). Regional variation was seen in the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 72 h of hospital admission (92 [17·9%] of 514 in Latin America, 53 [27·5%] of 193 in Africa, 454 [30·9%] of 1471 in China, 318 [44·4%] of 716 in Asia [excluding Chi
背景:在全球范围内,与跌倒有关的伤害是一个严重问题,80%的致命跌倒发生在低收入和中等收入国家。我们的目的是测量低收入和中等收入地区 50 岁及以上人群从受伤到接受髋部骨折手术的时间,以及测量在入院 72 小时内通过手术稳定髋部骨折的患者比例,并确定与手术延迟相关的风险因素:在这项二次分析中,我们分析了 2014 年 3 月 29 日至 2022 年 6 月 15 日期间为国际骨折护理骨科多中心研究(INORMUS)从非洲、拉丁美洲、中国、印度和亚洲(不包括中国和印度)收集的数据。INORMUS 研究中的患者如果年龄在 50 岁或以上,且因地面摔倒导致孤立性原发性髋部骨折,则可纳入本次分析。参与医院的工作人员会对肌肉骨骼损伤患者进行鉴定,并将其转诊以进行资格评估。我们将从受伤到手术的时间报告为三个不同的时间段:从受伤到入院的时间、从入院到手术的时间以及从受伤到手术的总时间。受伤日期和时间由患者在研究招募时自行报告。如果受伤后入院时间超过 24 小时,患者会报告延迟入院的主要原因。手术、未手术和手术延迟的原因由治疗小组报告。对于接受手术的患者,采用多变量回归分析来确定手术延迟的风险因素:来自 24 个国家 55 家医院的 4486 名年龄在 50 岁或以上、患有孤立性原发性髋部骨折的成人参加了 INORMUS。各国被分为五个地区:非洲(4486 人中有 418 人[9-3%])、拉丁美洲(558 人[12-4%])、中国(1680 人[37-4%])、印度(1059 人[23-6%])和亚洲(不包括中国和印度;771 人[17-2%])。在 4486 名患者中,3805 人(84-8%)接受了手术治疗。所有地区的手术率都差不多,但非洲除外,418 名患者中只有 193 人(46-3%)接受了手术。总体而言,4486 名患者中有 2791 人(62-2%)在受伤后 24 小时内入院。然而,在 4486 名患者中,有 1019 人(22-7%)在受伤后 72 小时或更长时间内延迟入院。延迟入院超过24小时的两个最常见原因是从其他医院转院(1441人中有522人[36-2%]),以及患者认为损伤会自行愈合而延迟就医(480人[33-3%])。入院后,3805 名患者中有 1451 人(38-1%)在 72 小时内接受了手术(中位数为 4-0 天[IQR 1-7-6-0])。入院 72 小时内接受手术的患者比例存在地区差异(拉丁美洲 514 例中有 92 例[17-9%],非洲 193 例中有 53 例[27-5%],中国 1471 例中有 454 例[30-9%],亚洲(不包括中国和印度)716 例中有 318 例[44-4%],印度 911 例中有 534 例[58-6%])。在所有 3805 名接受手术治疗的患者中,有 2353 人(61-8%)从入院起等待了 72 小时或更长时间。从受伤起 72 小时内接受手术治疗的患者比例为 3805 人中的 889 人(23-4%)(拉丁美洲 517 人中的 50 人(9-7%)、非洲 193 人中的 31 人(16-1%)、中国 1471 人中的 277 人(18-8%)、亚洲(不包括中国和印度)716 人中的 189 人(26-4%)和印度 911 人中的 342 人(37-5%)):入院后 72 小时内接受手术的机会较少,影响手术时间的因素因地区而异。要了解髋部骨折护理的现有途径,就必须掌握相关数据,以便为当地制定质量改进措施提供依据:资金来源:澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会、加拿大健康研究所、麦克马斯特外科协会、汉密尔顿健康科学公司和美国国立卫生研究院。
{"title":"Time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in low-income and middle-income regions: a secondary analysis of data from the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS)","authors":"Elizabeth Armstrong MPH ,&nbsp;Kris Rogers PhD ,&nbsp;Chuan Silvia Li MSc ,&nbsp;Jagnoor Jagnoor PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Moroz MD ,&nbsp;Gerald Chukwuemeka Oguzie MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Hailu MD ,&nbsp;Prof Theodore Miclau III MD ,&nbsp;Fernando de la Huerta MD ,&nbsp;Jose de Jesus Martinez-Ruiz MD ,&nbsp;Fernando Bidolegui MD ,&nbsp;Prof Junlin Zhou MD ,&nbsp;Prof Xinlong Ma MD ,&nbsp;Prof Bo Wu MD ,&nbsp;Parag Sancheti PhD ,&nbsp;La Ngoc Quang MD ,&nbsp;Vali Baigi PhD ,&nbsp;Mashyaneh Haddadi MD ,&nbsp;Maoyi Tian PhD ,&nbsp;Sheila Sprague PhD ,&nbsp;Igor A. Escalante Elguezabal","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00062-X","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Globally, fall-related injuries are a substantial problem, and 80% of fatal falls occur in low-income and middle-income countries. We aimed to measure time from injury to hip-fracture surgery in people aged 50 years or older living in low-income and middle-income regions, as well as to measure the proportion of patients with surgical stabilisation of their hip fracture within 72 h of admission to hospital and to identify risk factors associated with surgical delay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;For this secondary analysis, we analysed data collected from Africa, Latin America, China, India, and Asia (excluding China and India) for the International Orthopaedic Multicentre Study in Fracture Care (INORMUS) between March 29, 2014, and June 15, 2022. Patients from INORMUS were included in this analysis if they were aged 50 years or older and had an isolated, primary hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall. Staff at participating hospitals identified patients with musculoskeletal injury and referred them for assessment of eligibility. We report time from injury to surgery as three distinct time periods: time from injury to hospital admission, time from admission to surgery, and a total time from injury to surgery. Date and time of injury were self-reported by patients at the time of study recruitment. If time to hospital admission after injury exceeded 24 h, patients reported the primary reason for delayed admission. Reasons for surgery, no surgery, and surgical delay were reported by the treating team. For patients undergoing surgery, multivariable regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for surgical delay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;4486 adults aged 50 years or older with an isolated, primary hip fracture were enrolled in INORMUS from 55 hospitals in 24 countries. Countries were grouped into five regions: Africa (418 [9·3%] of 4486), Latin America (558 [12·4%]), China (1680 [37·4%]), India (1059 [23·6%]) and Asia (excluding China and India; 771 [17·2%]). Of 4486 patients, 3805 (84·8%) received surgery. The rate of surgery was similar in all regions except in Africa, where only 193 (46·3%) of 418 patients had surgery. Overall, 2791 (62·2%) of 4486 patients were admitted to hospital within 24 h of injury. However, 1019 (22·7%) of 4486 patients had delayed hospital admission of 72 h or more from injury. The two most common reasons for delayed admission of more than 24 h were transfer from another hospital (522 [36·2%] of 1441) and delayed care-seeking because patients thought the injury would heal on its own (480 [33·3%]). Once admitted to hospital, 1451 (38·1%) of 3805 patients who received surgery did so within 72 h (median 4·0 days [IQR 1·7–6·0]). Regional variation was seen in the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 72 h of hospital admission (92 [17·9%] of 514 in Latin America, 53 [27·5%] of 193 in Africa, 454 [30·9%] of 1471 in China, 318 [44·4%] of 716 in Asia [excluding Chi","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages e552-e562"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400062X/pdfft?md5=5dc7aa47625fc75db61bf34ba5fbbad1&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400062X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leadership – can you be too old? 领导力--你能太老吗?
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
{"title":"Leadership – can you be too old?","authors":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Page 503"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001405/pdfft?md5=8bf7c352484263f11e89e1ddb6b6446a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001405-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of antihypertensive deprescribing on hospitalisation and mortality: long-term follow-up of the OPTiMISE randomised controlled trial 降压药减量对住院和死亡率的影响:OPTiMISE 随机对照试验的长期随访。
IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4
James P Sheppard PhD , Eleanor Temple MSc , Ariel Wang PhD , Anne Smith , Stephanie Pollock DPhil , Prof Gary A Ford FMedSci , Prof F D Richard Hobbs FMedSci , Nicola Kenealy BSc , Prof Paul Little FMedSci , Mark Lown MRCGP , Prof Simon de Lusignan MD , Prof Jonathan Mant MD , David McCartney MRCGP , Prof Rupert A Payne FBPhS , Marney Williams BEd , Prof Ly-Mee Yu DPhil , Prof Richard J McManus PhD , OPTiMISE Investigators
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deprescribing of antihypertensive medications is recommended for some older patients with low blood pressure and frailty. The OPTiMISE trial showed that this deprescribing can be achieved with no differences in blood pressure control at 3 months compared with usual care. We aimed to examine effects of deprescribing on longer-term hospitalisation and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomised controlled trial enrolled participants from 69 general practices across central and southern England. Participants aged 80 years or older, with systolic blood pressure less than 150 mm Hg and who were receiving two or more antihypertensive medications, were randomly assigned (1:1) to antihypertensive medication reduction (removal of one antihypertensive) or usual care. General practitioners and participants were aware of the treatment allocation following randomisation but individuals responsible for analysing the data were masked to the treatment allocation throughout the study. Participants were followed up via their primary and secondary care electronic health records at least 3 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was time to all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. Intention-to-treat analyses were done using Cox regression modelling. A per-protocol analysis of the primary outcome was also done, excluding participants from the intervention group who did not reduce treatment or who had medication reinstated during the initial trial 12-week follow-up period. This study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT2016-004236-38) and the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN97503221).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between March 20, 2017, and Sept 30, 2018, a total of 569 participants were randomly assigned. Of these, 564 (99%; intervention=280; control=284) were followed up for a median of 4·0 years (IQR 3·7–4·3). Participants had a mean age of 84·8 years (SD 3·4) at baseline and 273 (48%) were women. Medication reduction was sustained in 109 participants at follow-up (51% of the 213 participants alive in the intervention group). Participants in the intervention group had a larger reduction in antihypertensives than the control group (adjusted mean difference –0·35 drugs [95% CI –0·52 to –0·18]). Overall, 202 (72%) participants in the intervention group and 218 (77%) participants in the control group experienced hospitalisation or mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·76 to 1·12]). There was some evidence that the proportion of participants experiencing the primary outcome in the per-protocol population was lower in the intervention group (aHR 0·80 [0·64 to 1·00]).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Half of participants sustained medication reduction with no evidence of an increase in all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. These findings suggest that an antihypertensive deprescribing intervention might be safe for people age
背景:建议对一些低血压和体弱的老年患者减量服用降压药。OPTiMISE 试验表明,与常规治疗相比,减药后 3 个月的血压控制效果没有差异。我们的目标是研究减量对长期住院率和死亡率的影响:这项随机对照试验招募了英格兰中部和南部 69 家全科诊所的参与者。年龄在 80 岁或以上、收缩压低于 150 mm Hg 且服用两种或两种以上降压药的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受降压药减量治疗(停用一种降压药)或常规治疗。全科医生和参与者都知道随机分配后的治疗方案,但负责分析数据的人员在整个研究过程中都不知道治疗方案的分配。参与者在随机分配后至少 3 年通过其初级和中级医疗电子健康记录接受随访。主要结果是全因住院时间或死亡率。采用 Cox 回归模型进行意向治疗分析。此外,还对主要结果进行了协议分析,排除了干预组中未减少治疗或在最初试验的12周随访期间恢复用药的参与者。本研究已在欧盟药物管理局临床试验数据库(EudraCT2016-004236-38)和ISRCTN注册中心(ISRCTN97503221)注册:2017年3月20日至2018年9月30日期间,共有569名参与者被随机分配。其中,564人(99%;干预组=280人;对照组=284人)接受了中位数为4-0年(IQR为3-7-4-3)的随访。基线参与者的平均年龄为 84-8 岁(SD 3-4),273 人(48%)为女性。有 109 名参与者在随访中持续减少用药(占干预组 213 名存活参与者的 51%)。与对照组相比,干预组的参与者减少了更多的降压药(调整后的平均差异为-0-35 种药物 [95% CI -0-52至-0-18])。总体而言,干预组中有 202 人(72%)在随访期间住院或死亡,对照组中有 218 人(77%)住院或死亡(调整后危险比 [aHR] 0-93 [95% CI 0-76 to 1-12])。有证据表明,在干预组中,按协议人群中出现主要结果的参与者比例较低(aHR 0-80 [0-64 to 1-00]):半数参与者持续减少用药,没有证据表明全因住院率或死亡率上升。这些研究结果表明,对于80岁或80岁以上、血压得到控制、服用两种或两种以上降压药的人来说,降压药减量干预可能是安全的:资金来源:英国心脏基金会和国家健康与护理研究所。
{"title":"Effect of antihypertensive deprescribing on hospitalisation and mortality: long-term follow-up of the OPTiMISE randomised controlled trial","authors":"James P Sheppard PhD ,&nbsp;Eleanor Temple MSc ,&nbsp;Ariel Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Anne Smith ,&nbsp;Stephanie Pollock DPhil ,&nbsp;Prof Gary A Ford FMedSci ,&nbsp;Prof F D Richard Hobbs FMedSci ,&nbsp;Nicola Kenealy BSc ,&nbsp;Prof Paul Little FMedSci ,&nbsp;Mark Lown MRCGP ,&nbsp;Prof Simon de Lusignan MD ,&nbsp;Prof Jonathan Mant MD ,&nbsp;David McCartney MRCGP ,&nbsp;Prof Rupert A Payne FBPhS ,&nbsp;Marney Williams BEd ,&nbsp;Prof Ly-Mee Yu DPhil ,&nbsp;Prof Richard J McManus PhD ,&nbsp;OPTiMISE Investigators","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00131-4","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Deprescribing of antihypertensive medications is recommended for some older patients with low blood pressure and frailty. The OPTiMISE trial showed that this deprescribing can be achieved with no differences in blood pressure control at 3 months compared with usual care. We aimed to examine effects of deprescribing on longer-term hospitalisation and mortality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This randomised controlled trial enrolled participants from 69 general practices across central and southern England. Participants aged 80 years or older, with systolic blood pressure less than 150 mm Hg and who were receiving two or more antihypertensive medications, were randomly assigned (1:1) to antihypertensive medication reduction (removal of one antihypertensive) or usual care. General practitioners and participants were aware of the treatment allocation following randomisation but individuals responsible for analysing the data were masked to the treatment allocation throughout the study. Participants were followed up via their primary and secondary care electronic health records at least 3 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was time to all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. Intention-to-treat analyses were done using Cox regression modelling. A per-protocol analysis of the primary outcome was also done, excluding participants from the intervention group who did not reduce treatment or who had medication reinstated during the initial trial 12-week follow-up period. This study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT2016-004236-38) and the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN97503221).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Between March 20, 2017, and Sept 30, 2018, a total of 569 participants were randomly assigned. Of these, 564 (99%; intervention=280; control=284) were followed up for a median of 4·0 years (IQR 3·7–4·3). Participants had a mean age of 84·8 years (SD 3·4) at baseline and 273 (48%) were women. Medication reduction was sustained in 109 participants at follow-up (51% of the 213 participants alive in the intervention group). Participants in the intervention group had a larger reduction in antihypertensives than the control group (adjusted mean difference –0·35 drugs [95% CI –0·52 to –0·18]). Overall, 202 (72%) participants in the intervention group and 218 (77%) participants in the control group experienced hospitalisation or mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·76 to 1·12]). There was some evidence that the proportion of participants experiencing the primary outcome in the per-protocol population was lower in the intervention group (aHR 0·80 [0·64 to 1·00]).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Half of participants sustained medication reduction with no evidence of an increase in all-cause hospitalisation or mortality. These findings suggest that an antihypertensive deprescribing intervention might be safe for people age","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages e563-e573"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824001314/pdfft?md5=4ff5939879eacaa149462e5d9052625b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824001314-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1