首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Healthy Longevity最新文献

英文 中文
Thank you to The Lancet Healthy Longevity statistical and peer reviewers in 2025 感谢《柳叶刀健康长寿》杂志2025年的统计数据和同行评审。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100818
The Lancet Healthy Longevity Editors
{"title":"Thank you to The Lancet Healthy Longevity statistical and peer reviewers in 2025","authors":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity Editors","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100818","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100818"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A global gap in autonomy assessment among older adults: a COSMIN systematic review 老年人自主性评估的全球差距:COSMIN系统综述。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100814
Masoud Rahmati PhD , Thomas Renou MSc , Sibylle Del Duca MSc , Houria El Ouazzani PhD , Marie Anastasie Aim PhD , Prof Lee Smith PhD , Prof Dong Keon Yon PhD , Prof Pascal Auquier PhD , Prof Laurent Boyer PhD , Karine Baumstarck PhD
Autonomy is increasingly recognised as the basis of healthy ageing and person-centred care; however, it remains under-represented in clinical assessments and policy. We systematically reviewed patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-reported outcome measures of autonomy in adults aged 60 years and older (older adults), following the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) methodology (PROSPERO CRD42025640772). Across 116 studies involving 861 338 older adults in 42 countries, 50 instruments were evaluated for structural validity, reliability, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness. High-quality evidence supported structural validity in 29 instruments, internal consistency in 33, and test–retest reliability in 17, whereas content validity and responsiveness were often insufficient. 14 instruments met the COSMIN category A criteria (ie, instruments with sufficient content validity and at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency, indicating that they are reliable and suitable for recommendation) and were recommended for research and clinical use. Substantial gaps remain, particularly in cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the tested instruments, highlighting the need for internationally aligned, culturally robust, and co-created tools. Health authorities should adopt validated measures to assess autonomy, guide policy, and ensure equitable resource allocation.
自主性日益被认为是健康老龄化和以人为本的护理的基础;然而,它在临床评估和政策中的代表性仍然不足。遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)方法(PROSPERO CRD42025640772),我们系统地回顾了患者报告的结果测量和临床报告的60岁及以上成年人(老年人)自主性的结果测量。在涉及42个国家861 338名老年人的116项研究中,对50种工具进行了结构效度、信度、内部一致性、跨文化效度和反应性评估。高质量的证据支持29种工具的结构效度,33种工具的内部一致性,17种工具的重测信度,而内容效度和反应性往往不足。14种仪器符合COSMIN A类标准(即具有足够内容效度和至少具有足够内部一致性的低质量证据的仪器,表明它们是可靠的,适合推荐),并被推荐用于研究和临床使用。巨大的差距仍然存在,特别是在被测试工具的跨文化有效性和响应性方面,这突出了对国际协调、文化稳健和共同创造工具的需求。卫生当局应采取有效措施来评估自主权,指导政策,并确保公平的资源分配。
{"title":"A global gap in autonomy assessment among older adults: a COSMIN systematic review","authors":"Masoud Rahmati PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Renou MSc ,&nbsp;Sibylle Del Duca MSc ,&nbsp;Houria El Ouazzani PhD ,&nbsp;Marie Anastasie Aim PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Lee Smith PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Dong Keon Yon PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Pascal Auquier PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Laurent Boyer PhD ,&nbsp;Karine Baumstarck PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100814","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100814","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomy is increasingly recognised as the basis of healthy ageing and person-centred care; however, it remains under-represented in clinical assessments and policy. We systematically reviewed patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-reported outcome measures of autonomy in adults aged 60 years and older (older adults), following the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) methodology (PROSPERO CRD42025640772). Across 116 studies involving 861 338 older adults in 42 countries, 50 instruments were evaluated for structural validity, reliability, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness. High-quality evidence supported structural validity in 29 instruments, internal consistency in 33, and test–retest reliability in 17, whereas content validity and responsiveness were often insufficient. 14 instruments met the COSMIN category A criteria (ie, instruments with sufficient content validity and at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency, indicating that they are reliable and suitable for recommendation) and were recommended for research and clinical use. Substantial gaps remain, particularly in cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the tested instruments, highlighting the need for internationally aligned, culturally robust, and co-created tools. Health authorities should adopt validated measures to assess autonomy, guide policy, and ensure equitable resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100814"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146195754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining and addressing loneliness in older adults with cancer: an international Delphi consensus from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Geriatrics Study Group 定义和解决老年癌症患者的孤独感:来自癌症老年病学研究小组多国支持护理协会的国际德尔菲共识。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100811
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis PhD , Kristen R Haase PhD , Prof Sriram Yennu MD , Etienne Brain PhD , Chad Yixian Han PhD , Prof Jørn Herrstedt MD , Ayumu Matsuoka PhD , Joana Marinho PhD , Lewis Mustian BS , Sophie Pilleron PhD , Imogen Ramsey PhD , Christopher Steer MD , Prof Matti Aapro MD
Loneliness is a growing public health concern among older adults (aged 65 and older) but remains understudied and under-recognised in geriatric oncology. This Health Policy paper presents survey-based Delphi consensus statements developed by a global panel of experts from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Geriatrics Study Group on the definition, assessment, and management of loneliness in older adults with cancer, to inform research and clinical practice. A consensus was reached on the definitions of loneliness, emphasising upon both emotional and social components, and including contextual factors such as life events and community structures. Multidisciplinary assessment using brief evaluation tools at the time of cancer diagnosis was highlighted. Community-based interventions such as support groups, home visits, and psychological counselling were prioritised over technology-driven approaches for future research. Outcomes considered the most relevant for research on loneliness included quality of life, treatment adherence, and survival. These statements could guide future clinical and research initiatives targeting loneliness in geriatric oncology.
孤独是老年人(65岁及以上)日益严重的公共卫生问题,但在老年肿瘤学领域仍未得到充分研究和认识。本卫生政策文件提出了由多国癌症老年病学支持护理协会研究小组的全球专家小组就老年癌症患者孤独感的定义、评估和管理制定的基于调查的德尔菲共识声明,为研究和临床实践提供信息。人们对孤独的定义达成了共识,强调情感和社会因素,并包括生活事件和社区结构等背景因素。强调了在癌症诊断时使用简短评估工具的多学科评估。在未来的研究中,以社区为基础的干预措施,如支持小组、家访和心理咨询,优先于技术驱动的方法。被认为与孤独研究最相关的结果包括生活质量、治疗依从性和生存率。这些陈述可以指导未来针对老年肿瘤患者孤独感的临床和研究活动。
{"title":"Defining and addressing loneliness in older adults with cancer: an international Delphi consensus from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Geriatrics Study Group","authors":"Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis PhD ,&nbsp;Kristen R Haase PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Sriram Yennu MD ,&nbsp;Etienne Brain PhD ,&nbsp;Chad Yixian Han PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jørn Herrstedt MD ,&nbsp;Ayumu Matsuoka PhD ,&nbsp;Joana Marinho PhD ,&nbsp;Lewis Mustian BS ,&nbsp;Sophie Pilleron PhD ,&nbsp;Imogen Ramsey PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher Steer MD ,&nbsp;Prof Matti Aapro MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100811","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100811","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness is a growing public health concern among older adults (aged 65 and older) but remains understudied and under-recognised in geriatric oncology. This Health Policy paper presents survey-based Delphi consensus statements developed by a global panel of experts from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Geriatrics Study Group on the definition, assessment, and management of loneliness in older adults with cancer, to inform research and clinical practice. A consensus was reached on the definitions of loneliness, emphasising upon both emotional and social components, and including contextual factors such as life events and community structures. Multidisciplinary assessment using brief evaluation tools at the time of cancer diagnosis was highlighted. Community-based interventions such as support groups, home visits, and psychological counselling were prioritised over technology-driven approaches for future research. Outcomes considered the most relevant for research on loneliness included quality of life, treatment adherence, and survival. These statements could guide future clinical and research initiatives targeting loneliness in geriatric oncology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100811"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145949283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transgender ageing in Thailand: from visibility to recognition in healthy longevity 泰国的跨性别老龄化:从健康长寿的可见性到认可度。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100813
Suchanan Chieowisaman , Krit Pongpirul
{"title":"Transgender ageing in Thailand: from visibility to recognition in healthy longevity","authors":"Suchanan Chieowisaman ,&nbsp;Krit Pongpirul","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100813","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100813","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100813"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146044378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Lancet Healthy Longevity: looking to the future 柳叶刀健康长寿:展望未来。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100821
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
{"title":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity: looking to the future","authors":"The Lancet Healthy Longevity","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100821","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100821","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100821"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International trends and social disparities in pain of adults aged 50 years and older in 22 countries across Europe, Asia, and the Americas: a longitudinal population-based study 欧洲、亚洲和美洲22个国家50岁及以上成年人疼痛的国际趋势和社会差异:一项基于人口的纵向研究
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100808
Prof Esteban Calvo PhD , Jose T Medina MS , Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk PhD , Prof Katherine Keyes PhD , Prof Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia PhD , Antonia Díaz-Valdés PhD , Tamara Otzen PhD , Robin Richardson PhD , Prof Silvia Martins PhD

Background

The experience of pain is highly prevalent among older adults worldwide. This study aimed to compare trends and social disparities in pain for middle aged and older adults (ie, those aged ≥50 years) across countries to help identify high-pain or high-disparity hotspots needing intervention, and low-pain or low-disparity locations or timepoints from which policy and practice lessons could be drawn.

Methods

Country-specific pain trends were estimated using longitudinal logistic regressions on harmonised data for 212 904 adults aged older than 50 years observed repeatedly from 1998 to 2018 in 22 countries across three continents.

Findings

Unadjusted pain prevalence was 43·21% (95% CI 43·10–43·33) across all countries and years pooled. Instrument-adjusted prevalence ranged from 26·70% (95% CI 25·52–27·88; Netherlands, 2006) to 59·20% (58·02–60·38; France, 2016). Over the decade 2006–16, when most countries were observed, prevalence substantially increased in 15 countries (12·01 percentage points), decreased in China (6·60 percentage points), and remained steady in six countries. Prevalence was higher among women, those with less education (ie, completed less than high school), and older respondents (those aged >60 years), though disparities varied substantially across countries. Disparities widened over time in some countries (eg, Spain), but remained stable, declined, or reversed in others (eg, Sweden). In 2016, Denmark had the lowest overall pain disparity index, while South Korea had the highest.

Interpretation

There was a substantial increase in pain prevalence among middle aged and older adults in most countries studied. Cross-country, temporal, and sociodemographic variation indicates pain should be treated as a population public health issue.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, National Institute on Aging.
背景:疼痛的经历在全世界的老年人中非常普遍。本研究旨在比较各国中老年人(即年龄≥50岁的人)疼痛的趋势和社会差异,以帮助确定需要干预的高疼痛或高差异热点,以及可以从中吸取政策和实践经验的低疼痛或低差异地点或时间点。方法:对1998年至2018年在三大洲22个国家反复观察的212904名50岁以上成年人的统一数据进行纵向logistic回归,估计了国家特定的疼痛趋势。结果:在所有国家和年份中,未经调整的疼痛患病率为43.21% (95% CI 43.10 - 43.33)。仪器校正后的患病率从26.70% (95% CI 25.52 - 27.88;荷兰,2006年)到59.20%(58.02 - 6038;法国,2016年)。在对大多数国家进行观察的2006- 2016年十年间,15个国家的患病率大幅上升(12.01个百分点),中国下降(6.60个百分点),6个国家保持稳定。妇女、受教育程度较低的人(即完成高中以下学业的人)和年龄较大的受访者(60岁以下的人)的患病率较高,尽管各国之间的差异很大。随着时间的推移,差距在一些国家(如西班牙)扩大,但在其他国家(如瑞典)保持稳定、下降或逆转。2016年,丹麦的整体疼痛差距指数最低,而韩国最高。解释:在大多数被研究的国家中,中老年人的疼痛患病率大幅增加。跨国家、时间和社会人口的差异表明,疼痛应被视为人口公共卫生问题。资助:国家机构Investigación y Desarrollo,国家老龄化研究所。
{"title":"International trends and social disparities in pain of adults aged 50 years and older in 22 countries across Europe, Asia, and the Americas: a longitudinal population-based study","authors":"Prof Esteban Calvo PhD ,&nbsp;Jose T Medina MS ,&nbsp;Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Katherine Keyes PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia PhD ,&nbsp;Antonia Díaz-Valdés PhD ,&nbsp;Tamara Otzen PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Richardson PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Silvia Martins PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100808","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100808","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The experience of pain is highly prevalent among older adults worldwide. This study aimed to compare trends and social disparities in pain for middle aged and older adults (ie, those aged ≥50 years) across countries to help identify high-pain or high-disparity hotspots needing intervention, and low-pain or low-disparity locations or timepoints from which policy and practice lessons could be drawn.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Country-specific pain trends were estimated using longitudinal logistic regressions on harmonised data for 212 904 adults aged older than 50 years observed repeatedly from 1998 to 2018 in 22 countries across three continents.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Unadjusted pain prevalence was 43·21% (95% CI 43·10–43·33) across all countries and years pooled. Instrument-adjusted prevalence ranged from 26·70% (95% CI 25·52–27·88; Netherlands, 2006) to 59·20% (58·02–60·38; France, 2016). Over the decade 2006–16, when most countries were observed, prevalence substantially increased in 15 countries (12·01 percentage points), decreased in China (6·60 percentage points), and remained steady in six countries. Prevalence was higher among women, those with less education (ie, completed less than high school), and older respondents (those aged &gt;60 years), though disparities varied substantially across countries. Disparities widened over time in some countries (eg, Spain), but remained stable, declined, or reversed in others (eg, Sweden). In 2016, Denmark had the lowest overall pain disparity index, while South Korea had the highest.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>There was a substantial increase in pain prevalence among middle aged and older adults in most countries studied. Cross-country, temporal, and sociodemographic variation indicates pain should be treated as a population public health issue.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, National Institute on Aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100808"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypofractionated split-course versus standard radiotherapy in frail older patients with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (ELAN-RT trial): a non-inferiority, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial 低分割分割疗程与标准放疗在虚弱的老年头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者中的对比(ELAN-RT试验):一项非劣效性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100812
Cécile Ortholan MD , Anne Aupérin PhD , Prof Yungan Tao MD , Sophie Renard MD , Yoann Pointreau MD , Cédrik Lafond MD , Guillaume Bera MD , Pierre Boisselier MD , Karen Benezery MD , Séverine Racadot MD , Prof Florence Huguet MD , Marc Bollet MD , Antoine Laurent Braccini MD , Cédric Khoury MD , Stéphane Jacquot MD , Julie Villa MD , Laurent Martin MD , Alessia Di Rito MD , Nadia Wiazzane MD , Aurore Goineau MD , Xu-Shan Sun MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The standard treatment for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with localised, unresectable head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma is standard fractionated radiotherapy (SF-RT). However, its high toxicity and multiple fractions lead physicians to deliver tailored hypofractionated split-course radiotherapy (HSC-RT). The aim of the study was to compare these two radiotherapy methods in older patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This non-inferiority, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was done in 30 treating centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) across France and Monaco. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by geriatric evaluation, with stage II–IV head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma and in curative intent were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either SF-RT (70 Gy, 35 fractions over 7 weeks) or HSC-RT (55 Gy, 20 fractions, two courses of 2 weeks with 2 weeks stop). Randomisation was done by minimisation, and physicians and patients were not masked to the treatment group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months, analysed in all randomly assigned patients (intention-to-treat population). The non-inferiority margin was set at 16%. The study was sponsored by the Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête et Cou (GORTEC) and is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01864850</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between Oct 21, 2013, and Aug 22, 2018, 102 patients were randomly assigned to the HSC-RT group and 100 patients to the SF-RT group. One patient in the HSC-RT group refused treatment and follow-up and so was excluded, resulting in 101 patients in the HSC-RT group. Median age was 82 years (IQR 77–86); 145 (72%) were male and 56 (28%) were female. Median follow-up for overall survival was 56·6 months (IQR 41–69). In the intent-to-treat population, 35 (35%) of 101 patients were alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months in the HSC-RT group versus 33 (33%) of 100 patients in the SF-RT group (difference +2%, 95% CI –11 to 15). In the per-protocol population, 35 (36%) of 97 patients were alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months in the HSC-RT group versus 33 (35%) of 95 patients in the SF-RT group (difference +1%, –12 to 15). Median overall survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 10·3 to 17·0) in the HSC-RT group versus 18·9 months (14·3 to 30·9) in the SF-RT group (hazard ratio 1·32, 95% CI 0·97 to 1·81). Eight patients died between radiotherapy start and 30 days after radiotherapy end (five [5%] in the HSC-RT group and three [3%] in the SF-RT group). One patient in the HSC-RT group had a grade 4 adverse event (kidney failure), as did four in the SF-RT group (two mucositis, one septic shock, and one hemiplegia). Acute adverse events grade 3–5 occurred in 33 (36%) of 9
背景:老年患者(≥70岁)局部不可切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌的标准治疗是标准分次放疗(SF-RT)。然而,它的高毒性和多组分导致医生提供量身定制的低分割分程放疗(HSC-RT)。这项研究的目的是比较这两种放疗方法在老年患者中的应用。方法:这项非劣效性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验在法国和摩纳哥的30个治疗中心(癌症中心、大学和综合医院以及私人诊所)进行。年龄在70岁或以上、经老年评估为体弱、II-IV期头颈部鳞状细胞癌且有治愈意图的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受SF-RT (70 Gy, 35分,7周)或HSC-RT (55 Gy, 20分,2个疗程,2周停药)。随机化是通过最小化来完成的,医生和患者没有被掩盖到治疗组。主要终点是在所有随机分配的患者(意向治疗人群)中,在6个月时存活且局部区域完全缓解的患者比例。非劣效性差设定为16%。该研究由肿瘤放射学组织(Groupe d’oncologie radioth et Cou) (GORTEC)赞助,并在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT01864850。研究结果:2013年10月21日至2018年8月22日,102例患者被随机分配到HSC-RT组,100例患者被随机分配到SF-RT组。1例HSC-RT组患者拒绝治疗和随访,排除,共101例HSC-RT组患者。中位年龄82岁(IQR 77-86);其中男性145例(72%),女性56例(28%)。中位随访总生存期为56.6个月(IQR 41-69)。在意向治疗人群中,HSC-RT组101例患者中有35例(35%)在6个月时存活,而SF-RT组100例患者中有33例(33%)(差异+2%,95% CI -11至15)。在每个方案人群中,97名患者中有35名(36%)在6个月时HSC-RT组存活,而SF-RT组的95名患者中有33名(35%)存活(差异+1%,-12至15)。HSC-RT组的中位总生存期为13.0个月(95% CI 10.3 ~ 17.0),而SF-RT组的中位总生存期为18.9个月(14.3 ~ 30.9)(风险比1.32,95% CI 0.97 ~ 1.81)。8例患者在放疗开始至放疗结束后30天死亡(HSC-RT组5例[5%],SF-RT组3例[3%])。HSC-RT组中有1例患者出现4级不良事件(肾衰竭),SF-RT组中有4例(2例粘膜炎,1例感染性休克,1例偏瘫)。91例HSC-RT组患者中有33例(36%)发生了3-5级急性不良事件,93例SF-RT组患者中有44例(47%)发生了3-5级急性不良事件(p= 0.13;差异-11%,95% CI -25 ~ 3)。解释:与SF-RT相比,HSC-RT没有降低6个月的局部完全缓解率,可能是体弱老年患者的一种选择。然而,考虑到生存结果,它应该只提供给经老年评估认为不适合SF-RT的患者。资助:法国项目PAIR-VADS 2011(由法国国家癌症研究所、ARC基金会和法国癌症防治联盟赞助)、GEMLUC和GEFLUC。
{"title":"Hypofractionated split-course versus standard radiotherapy in frail older patients with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (ELAN-RT trial): a non-inferiority, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Cécile Ortholan MD ,&nbsp;Anne Aupérin PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Yungan Tao MD ,&nbsp;Sophie Renard MD ,&nbsp;Yoann Pointreau MD ,&nbsp;Cédrik Lafond MD ,&nbsp;Guillaume Bera MD ,&nbsp;Pierre Boisselier MD ,&nbsp;Karen Benezery MD ,&nbsp;Séverine Racadot MD ,&nbsp;Prof Florence Huguet MD ,&nbsp;Marc Bollet MD ,&nbsp;Antoine Laurent Braccini MD ,&nbsp;Cédric Khoury MD ,&nbsp;Stéphane Jacquot MD ,&nbsp;Julie Villa MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Martin MD ,&nbsp;Alessia Di Rito MD ,&nbsp;Nadia Wiazzane MD ,&nbsp;Aurore Goineau MD ,&nbsp;Xu-Shan Sun MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100812","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100812","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The standard treatment for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with localised, unresectable head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma is standard fractionated radiotherapy (SF-RT). However, its high toxicity and multiple fractions lead physicians to deliver tailored hypofractionated split-course radiotherapy (HSC-RT). The aim of the study was to compare these two radiotherapy methods in older patients.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This non-inferiority, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was done in 30 treating centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) across France and Monaco. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by geriatric evaluation, with stage II–IV head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma and in curative intent were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either SF-RT (70 Gy, 35 fractions over 7 weeks) or HSC-RT (55 Gy, 20 fractions, two courses of 2 weeks with 2 weeks stop). Randomisation was done by minimisation, and physicians and patients were not masked to the treatment group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months, analysed in all randomly assigned patients (intention-to-treat population). The non-inferiority margin was set at 16%. The study was sponsored by the Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête et Cou (GORTEC) and is registered with &lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;NCT01864850&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Between Oct 21, 2013, and Aug 22, 2018, 102 patients were randomly assigned to the HSC-RT group and 100 patients to the SF-RT group. One patient in the HSC-RT group refused treatment and follow-up and so was excluded, resulting in 101 patients in the HSC-RT group. Median age was 82 years (IQR 77–86); 145 (72%) were male and 56 (28%) were female. Median follow-up for overall survival was 56·6 months (IQR 41–69). In the intent-to-treat population, 35 (35%) of 101 patients were alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months in the HSC-RT group versus 33 (33%) of 100 patients in the SF-RT group (difference +2%, 95% CI –11 to 15). In the per-protocol population, 35 (36%) of 97 patients were alive with complete locoregional response at 6 months in the HSC-RT group versus 33 (35%) of 95 patients in the SF-RT group (difference +1%, –12 to 15). Median overall survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 10·3 to 17·0) in the HSC-RT group versus 18·9 months (14·3 to 30·9) in the SF-RT group (hazard ratio 1·32, 95% CI 0·97 to 1·81). Eight patients died between radiotherapy start and 30 days after radiotherapy end (five [5%] in the HSC-RT group and three [3%] in the SF-RT group). One patient in the HSC-RT group had a grade 4 adverse event (kidney failure), as did four in the SF-RT group (two mucositis, one septic shock, and one hemiplegia). Acute adverse events grade 3–5 occurred in 33 (36%) of 9","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100812"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146228958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delirium and adverse clinical outcomes: a matched cohort study in the UK Biobank 谵妄和不良临床结果:英国生物银行的匹配队列研究。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100816
Markus J Haapanen MD PhD , David D Ward PhD , Alison M Mudge MBBS PhD , Emily H Gordon MBBS PhD , Frederick A Graham BNurs PhD , Prof Kenneth Rockwood MD , Prof Ruth E Hubbard MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Delirium complicates up to one in four hospitalisations among older adults, but its clinical sequelae beyond cognitive impairment, functional decline, and mortality are not well characterised. Whether delirium signals broader multisystem vulnerability leading to later adverse outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to examine the association of in-hospital delirium with the occurrence of a range of adverse outcomes during later hospitalisations in the UK.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a matched cohort study among hospitalised UK Biobank participants recruited in England, Scotland, and Wales in 2006–10 with linked hospital inpatient records collected from Jan 1, 1997 to Oct 31, 2022. We matched 14 909 individuals with delirium (1:1) to hospitalised control individuals without delirium by age, sex, Hospital Frailty Risk Score, primary diagnosis, episode length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay of the index episode. The primary outcome was the risk of adverse clinical outcomes following delirium. Delirium was identified by ICD-10 codes, with exposure intensity defined as the number of episodes within 12 months of the index admission. Adverse clinical outcomes were selected based on existing literature and included incident events occurring during subsequent hospitalisations: falls, fractures (any and hip), pressure injury, urinary and faecal incontinence, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia, and sepsis. Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models accounted for death as a competing risk and adjusted for socioeconomic covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Over a maximum follow-up of 26 years, the median time to event was 1·2 years (IQR 0·2–3·3) in the delirium group and 1·3 years (0·3–3·6) in the control group. Delirium was associated with a higher risk of 12 of the 15 adverse clinical outcomes than no delirium, which were urinary incontinence (subdistribution hazard ratio 2·01 [95% CI 1·78–2·28]), falls (1·96 [1·78–2·17]), pressure injury (1·72 [1·53–1·93]), acute kidney injury (1·71 [1·57–1·86]), sepsis (1·67 [1·52–1·84]), hip fracture (1·66 [1·39–2·00]), stroke (1·62 [1·41–1·87]), overall fractures (1·56 [1·40–1·74]), pneumonia (1·53 [1·41–1·65]), faecal incontinence (1·53 [1·31–1·78]), heart failure (1·31 [1·18–1·45]), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1·23 [1·09–1·38]). Each additional episode was associated with a 6–17% higher risk. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses excluding individuals with short follow-up, those with prevalent dementia, and the least well-matched pairs.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In-hospital delirium was consistently and dose-responsively associated with a range of adverse outcomes, independent of frailty and pre-existing dementia, supporting its recognition as a sentinel event indicating longer-term vulnerability.</
背景:在老年人中,谵妄并发症高达四分之一,但其临床后遗症超出认知障碍,功能下降和死亡率尚未得到很好的表征。谵妄是否预示着更广泛的多系统脆弱性导致后来的不良后果仍不确定。我们的目的是检查院内谵妄与英国住院期间一系列不良后果发生的关系。方法:我们对2006- 2010年在英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士招募的住院英国生物银行参与者进行了匹配队列研究,并收集了1997年1月1日至2022年10月31日的相关住院记录。我们将14909例谵妄患者(1:1)与非谵妄的住院对照患者按年龄、性别、医院虚弱风险评分、初步诊断、发作时间和指数发作的重症监护病房时间进行匹配。主要结果是谵妄后不良临床结果的风险。谵妄由ICD-10代码确定,暴露强度定义为入院后12个月内的发作次数。不良临床结局是根据现有文献选择的,包括随后住院期间发生的事件:跌倒、骨折(任何和髋部)、压力损伤、尿失禁和大便失禁、心肌梗死、心力衰竭、中风、静脉血栓栓塞、肺栓塞、急性肾损伤、胃肠道出血、肺炎和败血症。细灰色亚分布风险模型将死亡作为一种竞争风险,并根据社会经济协变量进行了调整。结果:在最长26年的随访中,谵妄组到事件发生的中位时间为1.2年(IQR 0.2 -3),对照组为1.3年(0.3 - 6)。在15种不良临床结局中,谵妄与12种不良临床结局的风险高于无谵妄,分别是尿失禁(亚分布风险比为2.01 [95% CI为1.78 ~ 2.28])、跌倒(亚分布风险比为1.96[1.78 ~ 2.17])、压迫性损伤(1.72[1.53 ~ 1.93])、急性肾损伤(1.71[1.57 ~ 1.86])、败血症(1.67[1.52 ~ 1.84])、髋部骨折(1.66[1.39 ~ 2.00])、卒中(1.62[1.41 ~ 1.87])、整体骨折(1.56[1.40 ~ 1.74])、肺炎(1.53[1.41 ~ 1.65])、大便失禁(1.53[1.31 ~ 1.78])、心力衰竭(1.31[1.18 -1·45])和胃肠道出血(1.23[1.09 - 1.38])。每增加一次发作,风险增加6-17%。敏感性分析的结果一致,排除了随访时间短的个体、普遍痴呆患者和匹配程度最低的配对。解释:院内谵妄与一系列不良后果具有一致性和剂量反应性,独立于虚弱和先前存在的痴呆,支持其作为哨兵事件的认识,表明长期脆弱性。资助:Sigrid jussamlius基金会、Osk Huttunen基金会、赫尔辛基生物医学基金会和Finska Läkaresällskapet。
{"title":"Delirium and adverse clinical outcomes: a matched cohort study in the UK Biobank","authors":"Markus J Haapanen MD PhD ,&nbsp;David D Ward PhD ,&nbsp;Alison M Mudge MBBS PhD ,&nbsp;Emily H Gordon MBBS PhD ,&nbsp;Frederick A Graham BNurs PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Kenneth Rockwood MD ,&nbsp;Prof Ruth E Hubbard MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100816","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100816","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Delirium complicates up to one in four hospitalisations among older adults, but its clinical sequelae beyond cognitive impairment, functional decline, and mortality are not well characterised. Whether delirium signals broader multisystem vulnerability leading to later adverse outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to examine the association of in-hospital delirium with the occurrence of a range of adverse outcomes during later hospitalisations in the UK.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We performed a matched cohort study among hospitalised UK Biobank participants recruited in England, Scotland, and Wales in 2006–10 with linked hospital inpatient records collected from Jan 1, 1997 to Oct 31, 2022. We matched 14 909 individuals with delirium (1:1) to hospitalised control individuals without delirium by age, sex, Hospital Frailty Risk Score, primary diagnosis, episode length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay of the index episode. The primary outcome was the risk of adverse clinical outcomes following delirium. Delirium was identified by ICD-10 codes, with exposure intensity defined as the number of episodes within 12 months of the index admission. Adverse clinical outcomes were selected based on existing literature and included incident events occurring during subsequent hospitalisations: falls, fractures (any and hip), pressure injury, urinary and faecal incontinence, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia, and sepsis. Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models accounted for death as a competing risk and adjusted for socioeconomic covariates.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Over a maximum follow-up of 26 years, the median time to event was 1·2 years (IQR 0·2–3·3) in the delirium group and 1·3 years (0·3–3·6) in the control group. Delirium was associated with a higher risk of 12 of the 15 adverse clinical outcomes than no delirium, which were urinary incontinence (subdistribution hazard ratio 2·01 [95% CI 1·78–2·28]), falls (1·96 [1·78–2·17]), pressure injury (1·72 [1·53–1·93]), acute kidney injury (1·71 [1·57–1·86]), sepsis (1·67 [1·52–1·84]), hip fracture (1·66 [1·39–2·00]), stroke (1·62 [1·41–1·87]), overall fractures (1·56 [1·40–1·74]), pneumonia (1·53 [1·41–1·65]), faecal incontinence (1·53 [1·31–1·78]), heart failure (1·31 [1·18–1·45]), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1·23 [1·09–1·38]). Each additional episode was associated with a 6–17% higher risk. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses excluding individuals with short follow-up, those with prevalent dementia, and the least well-matched pairs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In-hospital delirium was consistently and dose-responsively associated with a range of adverse outcomes, independent of frailty and pre-existing dementia, supporting its recognition as a sentinel event indicating longer-term vulnerability.&lt;/","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100816"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146182769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frailty and prognosis of biomarker-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease: a Swedish, register-based, retrospective cohort study 生物标志物证实的阿尔茨海默病的虚弱和预后:瑞典一项基于登记的回顾性队列研究
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100797
Xin Xia PhD , Prof Maria Eriksdotter MD , Prof Henrik Zetterberg MD , Prof Silke Kern MD , Tobias Skillbäck PhD , Marco Toccaceli Blasi MD , Prof Bengt Winblad MD , Jonathan K L Mak PhD , Alice Margherita Ornago MD , Elena Pinardi MD , Prof Román Romero Ortuño PhD , Prof Linus Jönsson MD

Background

This study aimed to examine the value of frailty status (defined by the frailty index) in informing the prognosis of people living with Alzheimer’s disease.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders linked to other Swedish health-care registers to collect data from May 1, 2007, to Dec 31, 2020. We included people with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease dementia, both with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers supporting Alzheimer’s pathology. We excluded people living in an institution or those who did not have at least one Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We constructed a 41-item frailty index, incorporating diseases, symptoms, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and care dependency. Individuals with frailty index scores of 0·25 or above were considered frail. The associations between frailty and MMSE trajectories, subsequent institutionalisation, and mortality were evaluated by jointly modelling longitudinal and survival data. We also examined whether frailty could modify the associations between CSF amyloid β42, phosphorylated tau181, and total tau and cognitive decline.

Findings

The study included 7251 individuals (mean age 72·7 years, 4271 [58·9%] females, 2980 [41·1%] males). Frailty was associated with a 0·723-point (95% CI 0·250–1·196) lower baseline MMSE but not with the rate of MMSE decline. Frailty was associated with a hazard ratio of 1·91 (1·43–2·54) for institutionalisation and 2·41 (1·73–3·33) for mortality. Individuals living with frailty had a 1·3-year (0·9–1·7) shorter lifespan and a 1·0-year (0·8–1·3) shorter non-institutionalised lifespan. Associations between CSF biomarkers and MMSE trajectories did not differ by frailty status.

Interpretation

Frailty, measured by the frailty index, predicted institutionalisation and mortality in people with Alzheimer’s disease, but its absence of association with cognitive decline suggests neurodegeneration as the primary driver.

Funding

Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking and Vinnova.
背景:本研究旨在探讨衰弱状态(由衰弱指数定义)在阿尔茨海默病患者预后中的价值。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用瑞典认知/痴呆障碍登记处与其他瑞典卫生保健登记处相关联,收集2007年5月1日至2020年12月31日的数据。我们纳入了患有轻度认知障碍或阿尔茨海默病痴呆的患者,他们的脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物均支持阿尔茨海默病的病理。我们排除了生活在机构中的人或没有至少进行过一次迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)的人。我们构建了41项虚弱指数,包括疾病、症状、多种药物、营养状况和护理依赖。脆弱指数得分在0.25或以上的个体被认为虚弱。脆弱性与MMSE轨迹、随后的制度化和死亡率之间的关联通过联合建模纵向和生存数据进行评估。我们还研究了虚弱是否可以改变脑脊液淀粉样蛋白β42、磷酸化tau181和总tau蛋白与认知能力下降之间的关系。结果:共纳入7251例个体,平均年龄72.7岁,女性4271例(58.9%),男性2980例(41.1%)。虚弱与基线MMSE降低0.723点(95% CI 0.250 - 1.196)相关,但与MMSE下降率无关。衰弱与住院的风险比为1.91(1.43 -2·54),与死亡的风险比为2.41(1.73 -3·33)。生活虚弱的个体寿命缩短1.3年(0.9 - 1.7年),非机构寿命缩短1.0年(0.8 - 1.3年)。脑脊液生物标志物和MMSE轨迹之间的关联没有因虚弱状态而异。解释:虚弱,通过虚弱指数来衡量,预示着阿尔茨海默病患者的制度化和死亡率,但它与认知能力下降没有关联,这表明神经退行性变是主要的驱动因素。资助:创新健康倡议联合事业和Vinnova。
{"title":"Frailty and prognosis of biomarker-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease: a Swedish, register-based, retrospective cohort study","authors":"Xin Xia PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Maria Eriksdotter MD ,&nbsp;Prof Henrik Zetterberg MD ,&nbsp;Prof Silke Kern MD ,&nbsp;Tobias Skillbäck PhD ,&nbsp;Marco Toccaceli Blasi MD ,&nbsp;Prof Bengt Winblad MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan K L Mak PhD ,&nbsp;Alice Margherita Ornago MD ,&nbsp;Elena Pinardi MD ,&nbsp;Prof Román Romero Ortuño PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Linus Jönsson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100797","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100797","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to examine the value of frailty status (defined by the frailty index) in informing the prognosis of people living with Alzheimer’s disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders linked to other Swedish health-care registers to collect data from May 1, 2007, to Dec 31, 2020. We included people with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease dementia, both with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers supporting Alzheimer’s pathology. We excluded people living in an institution or those who did not have at least one Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We constructed a 41-item frailty index, incorporating diseases, symptoms, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and care dependency. Individuals with frailty index scores of 0·25 or above were considered frail. The associations between frailty and MMSE trajectories, subsequent institutionalisation, and mortality were evaluated by jointly modelling longitudinal and survival data. We also examined whether frailty could modify the associations between CSF amyloid β<sub>42</sub>, phosphorylated tau<sub>181</sub>, and total tau and cognitive decline.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The study included 7251 individuals (mean age 72·7 years, 4271 [58·9%] females, 2980 [41·1%] males). Frailty was associated with a 0·723-point (95% CI 0·250–1·196) lower baseline MMSE but not with the rate of MMSE decline. Frailty was associated with a hazard ratio of 1·91 (1·43–2·54) for institutionalisation and 2·41 (1·73–3·33) for mortality. Individuals living with frailty had a 1·3-year (0·9–1·7) shorter lifespan and a 1·0-year (0·8–1·3) shorter non-institutionalised lifespan. Associations between CSF biomarkers and MMSE trajectories did not differ by frailty status.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Frailty, measured by the frailty index, predicted institutionalisation and mortality in people with Alzheimer’s disease, but its absence of association with cognitive decline suggests neurodegeneration as the primary driver.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking and Vinnova.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100797"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical effectiveness of music interventions for dementia and depression in older people (MIDDEL): a multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial 音乐干预老年人痴呆和抑郁症的临床效果(MIDDEL):一项多国、集群随机对照试验。
IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100783
Vigdis Sveinsdottir PhD , Jörg Assmus PhD , Prof Justine Schneider PhD , Prof Felicity A Baker PhD , Burçin Uçaner PhD , Prof Gunter Kreutz PhD , Monika Geretsegger PhD , Naomi Rasing PhD , Jodie Bloska MA , Phoebe A Stretton-Smith MMusThrp , Young-Eun C Lee PhD , Jo Dugstad Wake PhD , Prof Helen Odell-Miller PhD , Jeanette Tamplin PhD , Annemieke C Vink PhD , Joanne Ablewhite PhD , Johanna Neuser MSc , Ulrike Frischen Dr rer Nat , Prof Antje Timmer PhD , Prof Thomas Wosch PhD , Prof Christian Gold PhD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dementia and depression are among the leading causes of global disease burden. Effective and scalable interventions are needed to address the effect of these conditions, and music interventions are a promising non-pharmacological approach. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of music interventions on depressive symptoms among care home residents with dementia in Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Türkiye, and the UK.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Music Interventions for Dementia and Depression in Elderly care was a large, multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the effects of group music therapy, recreational choir singing, or both compared with standard care. The trial was done in 86 care home units across Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Türkiye, and the UK. Care home units were required to host at least ten residents who met the inclusion criteria. Participants were required to be aged 65 years or older; a full-time resident in a participating care home unit; have dementia as indicated by a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0·5–3 and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 26 or less; have mild depressive symptoms as indicated by a Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 8; and a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Care home units with residents with dementia and depressive symptoms were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1; block randomisation stratified by site, using a computer-generated list) to group music therapy, recreational choir singing, a combination of these strategies, or standard care. The primary outcome was MADRS assessed at 6 months in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants with available data. Assessors were masked but care staff, intervention providers, and residents were not masked due to the nature of the intervention. Intervention effects were analysed with ANCOVA for the total sample and per country. The trial was registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03496675</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, and is completed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between July 18, 2018, and Feb 1, 2023, 86 care home units with 1021 residents were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four groups. 22 care home units with 258 residents were randomly assigned to group music therapy, 22 care home units with 281 residents were allocated to recreational choir singing, 21 care home units with 244 residents were assigned to a combination of both group music therapy and recreational choir singing, and 21 care home units with 238 residents were assigned to standard care. The mean age of residents was 85·6 years (SD 7·4); most residents (747 [73·2%]) were female and 274 (26·8%) were male. Intention-to-treat analysis of 751 residents with data at 6 months showed no significant effect on MADRS scores of eit
背景:痴呆和抑郁症是全球疾病负担的主要原因之一。需要有效和可扩展的干预措施来解决这些条件的影响,而音乐干预是一种很有前途的非药物方法。本研究的目的是确定音乐干预对澳大利亚、德国、荷兰、挪威、土耳其和英国老年痴呆症养老院居民抑郁症状的有效性。方法:音乐干预对老年痴呆和抑郁症的治疗是一项大型、多国、集群随机对照试验,采用2 × 2因子设计,以检验团体音乐治疗、休闲合唱团演唱或两者与标准治疗的效果。这项试验在澳大利亚、德国、荷兰、挪威、土耳其和英国的86家养老院进行。护理院单位必须接待至少10名符合纳入标准的居民。参与者要求年龄在65岁或以上;住在参与护养院单位的全日制住客;患有痴呆,临床痴呆评分为0.5 -3分,迷你精神状态检查评分为26分或以下;蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)得分至少为8分,显示有轻度抑郁症状;以及痴呆症的临床诊断。有痴呆和抑郁症状的居民的护理院单位被随机分配(1:1:1:1;使用计算机生成的列表按地点进行分组随机分层)到团体音乐治疗、娱乐合唱团演唱、这些策略的组合或标准治疗。主要结局是在意向治疗人群中评估6个月时的MADRS,包括所有有可用数据的参与者。评估人员是蒙面的,但由于干预的性质,护理人员、干预提供者和住院医师没有蒙面。采用ANCOVA对总样本和每个国家的干预效果进行分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03496675,并已完成。研究结果:在2018年7月18日至2023年2月1日期间,共有86个养老院单位的1021名居民被纳入研究,并随机分配到四组中的一组。22个护理院单位有258名住客被随机分配到团体音乐治疗,22个护理院单位有281名住客被分配到娱乐合唱团演唱,21个护理院单位有244名住客被分配到团体音乐治疗和娱乐合唱团演唱的结合,21个护理院单位有238名住客被分配到标准护理。居民平均年龄85.6岁(SD 7.4);其中女性747例(73.2%),男性274例(26.8%)。对751名住院患者6个月的意向治疗分析显示,休闲合唱团演唱与无休闲合唱团演唱的MADRS评分(β 0.4 [95% CI -1·3至2.1];p= 0.68)、团体音乐治疗与无团体音乐治疗的MADRS评分(β 0.8[-1·0至2.6];p= 0.37)、休闲合唱团演唱与团体音乐治疗之间的相互作用(β 0.6[-3·1至1.9],p= 0.63; β代表ANCOVA估计的平均差异)均无显著影响。影响因国家而异。无相关不良事件报告,3个月和6个月时两组急性住院率相似。解释:在国际上,在这项研究中进行的积极的团体音乐干预在长期内并不比标准治疗更能减轻抑郁症状。国家是影响差异的最强预测因子,强调了文化和制度差异的重要性。干预准则和保健政策需要根据养老院人口和护理水平的具体情况精心调整。未来的多地点试验应侧重于更狭义的目标群体或背景,以减少异质性掩盖干预措施潜在效果的风险。尽管音乐干预可能对痴呆症患者有益,但有必要协调它们的实施,并研究它们起作用的机制。资助:欧盟联合计划-神经退行性疾病研究和澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会。
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of music interventions for dementia and depression in older people (MIDDEL): a multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial","authors":"Vigdis Sveinsdottir PhD ,&nbsp;Jörg Assmus PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Justine Schneider PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Felicity A Baker PhD ,&nbsp;Burçin Uçaner PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Gunter Kreutz PhD ,&nbsp;Monika Geretsegger PhD ,&nbsp;Naomi Rasing PhD ,&nbsp;Jodie Bloska MA ,&nbsp;Phoebe A Stretton-Smith MMusThrp ,&nbsp;Young-Eun C Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Jo Dugstad Wake PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Helen Odell-Miller PhD ,&nbsp;Jeanette Tamplin PhD ,&nbsp;Annemieke C Vink PhD ,&nbsp;Joanne Ablewhite PhD ,&nbsp;Johanna Neuser MSc ,&nbsp;Ulrike Frischen Dr rer Nat ,&nbsp;Prof Antje Timmer PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Thomas Wosch PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Christian Gold PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100783","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100783","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Dementia and depression are among the leading causes of global disease burden. Effective and scalable interventions are needed to address the effect of these conditions, and music interventions are a promising non-pharmacological approach. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of music interventions on depressive symptoms among care home residents with dementia in Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Türkiye, and the UK.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Music Interventions for Dementia and Depression in Elderly care was a large, multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the effects of group music therapy, recreational choir singing, or both compared with standard care. The trial was done in 86 care home units across Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Türkiye, and the UK. Care home units were required to host at least ten residents who met the inclusion criteria. Participants were required to be aged 65 years or older; a full-time resident in a participating care home unit; have dementia as indicated by a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0·5–3 and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 26 or less; have mild depressive symptoms as indicated by a Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 8; and a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Care home units with residents with dementia and depressive symptoms were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1; block randomisation stratified by site, using a computer-generated list) to group music therapy, recreational choir singing, a combination of these strategies, or standard care. The primary outcome was MADRS assessed at 6 months in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants with available data. Assessors were masked but care staff, intervention providers, and residents were not masked due to the nature of the intervention. Intervention effects were analysed with ANCOVA for the total sample and per country. The trial was registered at &lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;NCT03496675&lt;/span&gt;&lt;svg&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;/path&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, and is completed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Between July 18, 2018, and Feb 1, 2023, 86 care home units with 1021 residents were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four groups. 22 care home units with 258 residents were randomly assigned to group music therapy, 22 care home units with 281 residents were allocated to recreational choir singing, 21 care home units with 244 residents were assigned to a combination of both group music therapy and recreational choir singing, and 21 care home units with 238 residents were assigned to standard care. The mean age of residents was 85·6 years (SD 7·4); most residents (747 [73·2%]) were female and 274 (26·8%) were male. Intention-to-treat analysis of 751 residents with data at 6 months showed no significant effect on MADRS scores of eit","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100783"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
全部 Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Clim. Change Entomologisk tidskrift Environ. Prot. Eng. ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic) Ann. Glaciol. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. BIOGEOSCIENCES Engineering Structures and Technologies Atmos. Res. Geochem. Trans. Environmental Science: an Indian journal Nat. Clim. Change "Laboratorio;" analisis clinicos, bacteriologia, inmunologia, parasitologia, hematologia, anatomia patologica, quimica clinica J APPL METEOROL CLIM EXPERT REV RESP MED European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine [Hokkaido igaku zasshi] The Hokkaido journal of medical science ASTRON ASTROPHYS 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. Expert Rev. Neurother. Int. J. Paleopathol. Ocean Modell. Space Weather ACTA PARASITOL 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation FAM PRACT IEEE Magn. Lett. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. ACTA RADIOL Environ. Eng. Sci. Chem. Ecol. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2013 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) Aust. J. Earth Sci. J. Lumin. THALASSAS 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings Environmental Claims Journal Acta Geophys. ACTA VIROL ENVIRONMENT J PALAEONTOL SOC IND GEOLOGY Ecol. Indic. 2012 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest 山西省考古学会论文集 ACUPUNCT MED Eurasian Physical Technical Journal Yan Ke Xue Bao (Hong Kong) Scott. J. Geol. ACTA CARDIOL SIN Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. GEOL BELG J. Atmos. Chem. Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy J. Hydrol. Communications Earth & Environment ACTA PETROL SIN Espacio Tiempo y Forma. Serie VII, Historia del Arte Ecol. Processes REV MINERAL GEOCHEM J. Geog. Sci. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. AM J DENT Environ. Educ. Res, 2010 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering Environment and Natural Resources Journal ECOTOXICOLOGY Environ. Eng. Manage. J. J. Struct. Geol. Environ. Technol. Innovation Conserv. Biol. ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic) Environ. Chem. ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES ENG SANIT AMBIENT Basin Res. Environ. Eng. Res. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine Energy Environ. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal AIDS Geobiology Ecol. Monogr. Appl. Clay Sci. Org. Geochem. Acta Geochimica Carbon Balance Manage. ECOL RESTOR 2008 International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology & High Density Packaging Environ. Res. Lett. ACTA GEOL POL Clean-Soil Air Water Environ. Pollut. Bioavailability Ecol. Eng.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1